Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Schduler] Volunteers wanted for a modest proposal for an external scheduler in our lifetime

2013-12-03 Thread Robert Collins
The team size was a minimum, not a maximum - please add your names. We're currently waiting on the prerequisite blueprint to land before work starts in earnest; and for the blueprint to be approved (he says, without having checked to see if it has been now:)) -Rob On 3 December 2013 20:48,

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Schduler] Volunteers wanted for a modest proposal for an external scheduler in our lifetime

2013-12-03 Thread Calum Loudon
Hi all More volunteers for you - myself (Calum Loudon) and Colin Tregenza Dancer from Metaswitch (http://metaswitch.com). We're new to OpenStack development, so a bit of context: we develop software for the telecoms space, ranging from low-level network stacks to voice applications. We see

[openstack-dev] [UX] Topics Summary

2013-12-03 Thread Jaromir Coufal
Hey OpenStackers, based on the latest discussions, it was asked if we can try to post regular updates of what is happening in our community (mostly on Askbot forum: http://ask-openstackux.rhcloud.com). In this e-mail, I'd like to summarize ongoing issues and try to cover updates weekly (or

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-dev] How to modify a bug across multiple repo?

2013-12-03 Thread Robert Collins
No, you need to manually arrange to land your changes in first one repo then the other. -Rob On 3 December 2013 19:17, wu jiang win...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, Recently, I found a bug at API layer in Cinder, but the modifications relate to CinderClient Tempest. So, I'm confused how to

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][database] Update compute_nodes table

2013-12-03 Thread Abbass MAROUNI
I am aware of this work, in fact I reused a column (pci_stats) in the compute_nodes table to store a JSON blob. I track the resource in the resource_tracker and update the column and then use the blob in a filter. Maybe I should reformulate my question, How can I add a column to the table and use

[openstack-dev] [OpenStack-dev][cinder][glance] Should glance be installed on cinder only nodes?

2013-12-03 Thread gans developer
Hi All, I was performing Copy Image to Volume operation on my controller node which has glance and cinder installed. If i wish to create a cinder only node for cinder-volume operations , would i need to install glance also on this node for performing Copy Image to Volume operation ? Thanks,

Re: [openstack-dev] Incubation Request for Barbican

2013-12-03 Thread Thierry Carrez
Jarret Raim wrote: The TC is currently working on formalizing requirements for new programs and projects [3]. I figured I would give them a try against this application. First, I'm assuming that the application is for a new program that contains the new project. The application doesn't

[openstack-dev] [OpenStack-dev][cinder][glance] Should glance be installed on cinder only nodes?

2013-12-03 Thread gans developer
Hi All, I was performing Copy Image to Volume operation on my controller node which has glance and cinder installed. If i wish to create a cinder only node for cinder-volume operations , would i need to install glance also on this node for performing Copy Image to Volume operation ? Thanks,

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Schduler] Volunteers wanted for a modest proposal for an external scheduler in our lifetime

2013-12-03 Thread Thierry Carrez
Russell Bryant wrote: On 12/02/2013 11:41 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: I don't really care that much about deprecation in that case, but I care about which release the new project is made part of. Would you make it part of the Icehouse common release ? That means fast-tracking through incubation

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Schduler] Volunteers wanted for a modest proposal for an external scheduler in our lifetime

2013-12-03 Thread Khanh-Toan Tran
We are also interested in the proposal and would like to contribute whatever we can. Currently we're working on nova-scheduler we think that an independent scheduler is a need for Openstack. We've been engaging in several discussions on this topic in the ML as well as in Nova meeting, thus we were

[openstack-dev] [Neutron] L3 agent external networks

2013-12-03 Thread Sylvain Afchain
Hi, I was reviewing this patch (https://review.openstack.org/#/c/52884/) from Oleg and I thought that is a bit tricky to deploy an l3 agent with automation tools like Puppet since you have to specify the uuid of a network that doesn't already exist. It may be better to bind a l3 agent to an

[openstack-dev] {TripleO] UI Wireframes - close to implementation start

2013-12-03 Thread Jaromir Coufal
Hey folks, I opened 2 issues on UX discussion forum with TripleO UI topics: Resource Management: http://ask-openstackux.rhcloud.com/question/95/tripleo-ui-resource-management/ - this section was already reviewed before, there is not much surprises, just smaller updates - we are about to

Re: [openstack-dev] VMware Workstation / Fusion / Player Nova driver

2013-12-03 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 07:23:19PM +, Alessandro Pilotti wrote: On 02 Dec 2013, at 04:52 , Kyle Mestery (kmestery) kmest...@cisco.com wrote: This is very cool Alessandro, thanks for sharing! Any plans to try and get this nova driver upstreamed? My personal opinion is that

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-dev][cinder][glance] Should glance be installed on cinder only nodes?

2013-12-03 Thread Avishay Traeger
Gans, No, you don't need to install Glance on Cinder nodes. Cinder will use the Glance client, which must be installed on the Cinder node (see python-glanceclient the requirements.txt file in Cinder's tree). Thanks, Avishay From: gans developer gans.develo...@gmail.com To:

Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon] Javascript testing framework

2013-12-03 Thread Radomir Dopieralski
On 03/12/13 01:26, Maxime Vidori wrote: Hi! In order to improve the javascript quality of Horizon, we have to change the testing framework of the client-side. Qunit is a good tool for simple tests, but the integration of Angular need some powerful features which are not present in Qunit.

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] UI Wireframes - close to implementation start

2013-12-03 Thread Jaromir Coufal
I am sorry for mistake in tag - fixed in this reply and keeping the original text below. On 2013/03/12 10:25, Jaromir Coufal wrote: Hey folks, I opened 2 issues on UX discussion forum with TripleO UI topics: Resource Management:

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Blueprint: standard specification of guest CPU topology

2013-12-03 Thread Gary Kotton
Hi, I think that this information should be used as part of the scheduling decision, that is hosts that are to be selected should be excluded if they do not have the necessary resources available. It will be interesting to know how this is going to fit into the new scheduler that is being

Re: [openstack-dev] [ceilometer] [marconi] Notifications brainstorming session tomorrow @ 1500 UTC

2013-12-03 Thread Julien Danjou
On Mon, Dec 02 2013, Kurt Griffiths wrote: Following up on some conversations we had at the summit, I’d like to get folks together on IRC tomorrow to crystalize the design for a notifications project under the Marconi program. The project’s goal is to create a service for surfacing events to

Re: [openstack-dev] [Oslo] Layering olso.messaging usage of config

2013-12-03 Thread Julien Danjou
On Mon, Dec 02 2013, Joshua Harlow wrote: Thanks for writing this up, looking forward to seeing this happen so that oslo.messaging can be used outside of the core openstack projects (and be used in libraries that do not want to force a oslo.cfg model onto users of said libraries). Any idea

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-dev] How to modify a bug across multiple repo?

2013-12-03 Thread Christopher Yeoh
Hi, On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 7:21 PM, Robert Collins robe...@robertcollins.netwrote: No, you need to manually arrange to land your changes in first one repo then the other. -Rob On 3 December 2013 19:17, wu jiang win...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, Recently, I found a bug at API layer in

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Blueprint: standard specification of guest CPU topology

2013-12-03 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 01:47:31AM -0800, Gary Kotton wrote: Hi, I think that this information should be used as part of the scheduling decision, that is hosts that are to be selected should be excluded if they do not have the necessary resources available. It will be interesting to know how

Re: [openstack-dev] [Swift] Increase Swift ring partition power

2013-12-03 Thread Christian Schwede
Am 02.12.13 17:10, schrieb Gregory Holt: On Dec 2, 2013, at 9:48 AM, Christian Schwede christian.schw...@enovance.com wrote: That sounds great! Is someone already working on this (I know about the ongoing DiskFile refactoring) or even a blueprint available? There is

Re: [openstack-dev] Reg : Security groups implementation using openflows in quantum ovs plugin

2013-12-03 Thread Zang MingJie
On Sat, Nov 30, 2013 at 6:32 PM, Édouard Thuleau thul...@gmail.com wrote: And what do you think about the performance issue I talked ? Do you have any thought to improve wildcarding to use megaflow feature ? I have invested a little further, here is my environment X1 (10.0.5.1) --- OVS BR

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Blueprint: standard specification of guest CPU topology

2013-12-03 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 11:05:02PM -0800, Vui Chiap Lam wrote: Hi Daniel, I too found the original bp a little hard to follow, so thanks for writing up the wiki! I see that the wiki is now linked to the BP, which is great as well. The ability to express CPU topology constraints for the

Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon] Javascript testing framework

2013-12-03 Thread Maxime Vidori
I wrote a blueprint with a little description of features, and those which are not present in qUnit, tell me if you think it needs more details or the points which need more details. Here is the link: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/horizon/+spec/jasmine-integration. I think it could be the

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Blueprint: standard specification of guest CPU topology

2013-12-03 Thread Gary Kotton
On 12/3/13 12:08 PM, Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com wrote: On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 01:47:31AM -0800, Gary Kotton wrote: Hi, I think that this information should be used as part of the scheduling decision, that is hosts that are to be selected should be excluded if they do not have

[openstack-dev] Request for review (glance-multifilesystem-store patch)

2013-12-03 Thread Rangnekar, Aswad
Hi, We are targeting to complete adding multi file system support for Glance by Icehouse-1. Please review the patch: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/58997/ Aswad Rangnekar Senior Software Engineer RD (Cloud Computing) | NTT DATA Global Technology Services Pvt. Ltd. w. +91.20.6604.1500 x 574 |

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] Service scoped role definition

2013-12-03 Thread David Chadwick
I have added a number of comments to this. I have also expanded on the concept of role scoping for your consideration regards David On 02/12/2013 23:21, Tiwari, Arvind wrote: Hi Adam and David, Thank you so much for all the great comments, seems we are making good progress. I have

[openstack-dev] Server action using compute V2.0 API: add and remove security group

2013-12-03 Thread GROSZ, Maty (Maty)
Hey, I would like to know (and how do I know that from nova code) what kind of requests are these two APIs: Synchronized or a-synchronized (using compute v2.0 API): Server action add Security Group ? Server action remove Security Group ? I would like to know if the documented return response

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] UI Wireframes - close to implementation start

2013-12-03 Thread Jaromir Coufal
Wireframes walkthrough: https://www.youtube.com/enhance?v=oRtL3aCuEEc On 2013/03/12 10:25, Jaromir Coufal wrote: Hey folks, I opened 2 issues on UX discussion forum with TripleO UI topics: Resource Management: http://ask-openstackux.rhcloud.com/question/95/tripleo-ui-resource-management/ -

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Blueprint: standard specification of guest CPU topology

2013-12-03 Thread Day, Phil
Hi, I think the concept of allowing users to request a cpu topology, but have a few questions / concerns: The host is exposing info about vCPU count it is able to support and the scheduler picks on that basis. The guest image is just declaring upper limits on topology it can support. So

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Splitting up V3 API admin-actions plugin

2013-12-03 Thread Day, Phil
+1 from me - would much prefer to be able to pick this on an individual basis. Could kind of see a case for keeping reset_network and inject_network_info together - but don't have a strong feeling about it (as we don't use them) -Original Message- From: Andrew Laski

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Schduler] Volunteers wanted for a modest proposal for an external scheduler in our lifetime

2013-12-03 Thread Boris Pavlovic
Hi all, Finally found a bit time to write my thoughts. There are few blockers that make really complex to build scheduler as a services or even to move main part of scheduler code to separated lib. We already have one unsuccessfully effort

[openstack-dev] [Murano] Team meeting reminder - December 3

2013-12-03 Thread Alexander Tivelkov
Hi! This is just a reminder about the regular meeting of Murano-team in IRC. The meeting will be held in #openstack-meeting-alt channel at 10am Pacific. The complete agenda of the meeting is available here: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/MuranoAgenda -- Regards, Alexander Tivelkov

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-tc] Incubation Request for Barbican

2013-12-03 Thread Flavio Percoco
On 03/12/13 03:12 +, Jarret Raim wrote: There are two big parts to this, I think. One is techincal - a significant portion of OpenStack deployments will not work with this because Celery does not work with their deployed messaging architecture. See another reply in this thread for an

Re: [openstack-dev] Request for review (glance-multifilesystem-store patch)

2013-12-03 Thread Flavio Percoco
On 03/12/13 10:29 +, Rangnekar, Aswad wrote: We are targeting to complete adding multi file system support for Glance by Icehouse-1. Please review the patch: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/58997/ Please, do not send review requests to this list. Feel free to join #openstack-glance and

Re: [openstack-dev] [Solum] CLI minimal implementation

2013-12-03 Thread Roshan Agrawal
-Original Message- From: Russell Bryant [mailto:rbry...@redhat.com] Sent: Monday, December 02, 2013 8:17 PM To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Solum] CLI minimal implementation On 12/02/2013 07:03 PM, Roshan Agrawal wrote: I have created a child

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-tc] Incubation Request for Barbican

2013-12-03 Thread Doug Hellmann
On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 10:12 PM, Jarret Raim jarret.r...@rackspace.comwrote: There are two big parts to this, I think. One is techincal - a significant portion of OpenStack deployments will not work with this because Celery does not work with their deployed messaging architecture.

Re: [openstack-dev] [Solum] CLI minimal implementation

2013-12-03 Thread Arati Mahimane
On 12/3/13 7:51 AM, Roshan Agrawal roshan.agra...@rackspace.com wrote: -Original Message- From: Russell Bryant [mailto:rbry...@redhat.com] Sent: Monday, December 02, 2013 8:17 PM To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Solum] CLI minimal implementation

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Blueprint: standard specification of guest CPU topology

2013-12-03 Thread Day, Phil
Hi Daniel, I spent some more time reading your write up on the wiki (and it is a great write up BTW), and had a couple of further questions (I think my original ones are also still valid, but do let me know if / where I'm missing the point): iv) In the worked example where do the

[openstack-dev] Tool for detecting commonly misspelled words

2013-12-03 Thread Joe Gordon
HI all, Recently I have seen a few patches fixing a few typos. I would like to point out a really nifty tool to detect commonly misspelled words. So next time you want to fix a typo, instead of just fixing a single one you can go ahead and fix a whole bunch.

Re: [openstack-dev] [ceilometer][qa] Punting ceilometer from whitelist

2013-12-03 Thread Eoghan Glynn
- Original Message - On 12/02/2013 10:24 AM, Julien Danjou wrote: On Fri, Nov 29 2013, David Kranz wrote: In preparing to fail builds with log errors I have been trying to make things easier for projects by maintaining a whitelist. But these bugs in ceilometer are coming in so

Re: [openstack-dev] {TripleO] UI Wireframes - close to implementation start

2013-12-03 Thread Tzu-Mainn Chen
Hey folks, I opened 2 issues on UX discussion forum with TripleO UI topics: Resource Management: http://ask-openstackux.rhcloud.com/question/95/tripleo-ui-resource-management/ - this section was already reviewed before, there is not much surprises, just smaller updates - we are about to

Re: [openstack-dev] Tool for detecting commonly misspelled words

2013-12-03 Thread Sylvain Bauza
Great tool ! Just discovered that openstack.common.rpc does have typos, another good reason to migrate to oslo.messaging.rpc :-) -Sylvain 2013/12/3 Joe Gordon joe.gord...@gmail.com HI all, Recently I have seen a few patches fixing a few typos. I would like to point out a really nifty tool

Re: [openstack-dev] [ceilometer][qa] Punting ceilometer from whitelist

2013-12-03 Thread Sean Dague
On 12/03/2013 09:30 AM, Eoghan Glynn wrote: - Original Message - On 12/02/2013 10:24 AM, Julien Danjou wrote: On Fri, Nov 29 2013, David Kranz wrote: In preparing to fail builds with log errors I have been trying to make things easier for projects by maintaining a whitelist. But

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] L3 agent external networks

2013-12-03 Thread Robert Kukura
On 12/03/2013 04:23 AM, Sylvain Afchain wrote: Hi, I was reviewing this patch (https://review.openstack.org/#/c/52884/) from Oleg and I thought that is a bit tricky to deploy an l3 agent with automation tools like Puppet since you have to specify the uuid of a network that doesn't

Re: [openstack-dev] [Keystone] Store quotas in Keystone

2013-12-03 Thread Oleg Gelbukh
Chmouel, We reviewed the design of this feature at the summit with CERN and HP teams. Centralized quota storage in Keystone is an anticipated feature, but there are concerns about adding quota enforcement logic for every service to Keystone. The agreed solution is to add quota numbers storage to

Re: [openstack-dev] [Keystone] Store quotas in Keystone

2013-12-03 Thread John Dickinson
How are you proposing that this integrate with Swift's account and container quotas (especially since there may be hundreds of thousands of accounts and millions (billions?) of containers in a single Swift cluster)? A centralized lookup for quotas doesn't really seem to be a scalable solution.

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] UI Wireframes - close to implementation start

2013-12-03 Thread Jaromir Coufal
Please, instead of 'enhance', use 'watch': http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oRtL3aCuEEc (this link is correct) Thanks -- Jarda On 2013/03/12 12:53, Jaromir Coufal wrote: Wireframes walkthrough: https://www.youtube.com/enhance?v=oRtL3aCuEEc On 2013/03/12 10:25, Jaromir Coufal wrote: Hey

Re: [openstack-dev] [ceilometer][qa] Punting ceilometer from whitelist

2013-12-03 Thread David Kranz
On 12/03/2013 09:30 AM, Eoghan Glynn wrote: - Original Message - On 12/02/2013 10:24 AM, Julien Danjou wrote: On Fri, Nov 29 2013, David Kranz wrote: In preparing to fail builds with log errors I have been trying to make things easier for projects by maintaining a whitelist. But

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Blueprint: standard specification of guest CPU topology

2013-12-03 Thread Chris Friesen
On 12/03/2013 04:08 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 01:47:31AM -0800, Gary Kotton wrote: Hi, I think that this information should be used as part of the scheduling decision, that is hosts that are to be selected should be excluded if they do not have the necessary

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Thursday subteam meeting

2013-12-03 Thread Eugene Nikanorov
Hi, Sure they must have the same provider. Loadbalancer instance could be created in two ways: - implicitly with pool creation, then provider for the pool becomes provider for the instance. - explicitly, with pool created later on and attached to the instance. In that case provider attribute will

Re: [openstack-dev] [Keystone] Store quotas in Keystone

2013-12-03 Thread Shawn Hartsock
Sorry to jump into this late and all, but I am curious. Why not borrow the concept of flavors from Nova and apply them to quotas? While it is open to interpretation and I most certainly could be wrong, the why of flavors is that you want to plan. If you know that you have flavors that are

[openstack-dev] [Ironic] functional (aka integration) gate testing

2013-12-03 Thread Vladimir Kozhukalov
We are going to make integration testing gate scheme for Ironic and we've investigated several cases which are actual for TripleO. 1) https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/tripleo-test-cluster This is the newest and most advanced initiative. It is something like test environment on demand. It is still

[openstack-dev] [Solum] git-integration working group meeting reminder

2013-12-03 Thread Krishna Raman
Hi, We will hold our first Git Integration working group meeting on Wednesday, December 4, 2013 1700 UTC / 0900 PST [1]. Since we have about 13 people who wish to participate, Google hangout is no longer an option. Instead we will fall back to IRC and hold the meeting on #solum. I have updated

Re: [openstack-dev] [Keystone] Store quotas in Keystone

2013-12-03 Thread Jay Pipes
On 12/03/2013 10:04 AM, John Dickinson wrote: How are you proposing that this integrate with Swift's account and container quotas (especially since there may be hundreds of thousands of accounts and millions (billions?) of containers in a single Swift cluster)? A centralized lookup for quotas

[openstack-dev] [Neutron] DHCP Agent Reliability

2013-12-03 Thread Maru Newby
I've been investigating a bug that is preventing VM's from receiving IP addresses when a Neutron service is under high load: https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1192381 High load causes the DHCP agent's status updates to be delayed, causing the Neutron service to assume that the agent is

[openstack-dev] [scheduler] External scheduler design doc + review

2013-12-03 Thread Debojyoti Dutta
Hi I think we should do a review of the design doc review and have rough consensus (that it should work) followed by running code. …. As of now all the design stuff is supposedly in (as per the scheduler meeting today) https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/icehouse-external-scheduler Hope the core

[openstack-dev] Plugin Blueprint and ML2 Plugin

2013-12-03 Thread NAVEEN R K REDDY
Hi All, I have couple of questions wrt to plugin blueprint and ml2 plugin, 1. We are planning to submit the plugin into Openstack Icehouse release. The question we have is there any deadline for the plugin blueprint submission ? 2. Is there anything like mandatory for everyone need to

Re: [openstack-dev] [Solum] CLI minimal implementation

2013-12-03 Thread Paul Montgomery
I agree. With many optional parameters possible, positional parameters would seem to complicate things a bit (even for end users). On 12/3/13 8:14 AM, Arati Mahimane arati.mahim...@rackspace.com wrote: On 12/3/13 7:51 AM, Roshan Agrawal roshan.agra...@rackspace.com wrote: -Original

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack] Plugin Blueprint and ML2 Plugin

2013-12-03 Thread Kyle Mestery (kmestery)
Hi Naveen: The sooner you submit your blueprint the better, as Neutron core devs can comment on it and help answer questions for you. You can implement an ML2 MechanismDriver or a monolithic plugin, but if you file the BP we can help you decide which may be better for your environment. Keep in

[openstack-dev] [Neutron] Tuning QueuePool parameters?

2013-12-03 Thread Maru Newby
I recently ran into this bug while trying to concurrently boot a large number (75) of VMs: https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1160442 I see that the fix for the bug added configuration of SQLAlchemy QueuePool parameters that should prevent the boot failures I was seeing. However, I

Re: [openstack-dev] [Solum] CLI minimal implementation

2013-12-03 Thread Randall Burt
I disagree. If a param is required and has no meaningful default, it should be positional IMO. I think this actually reduces confusion as you can tell from the signature alone that this is a value the user must supply to have any meaningful thing happen. On Dec 3, 2013, at 10:13 AM, Paul

Re: [openstack-dev] Incubation Request for Barbican

2013-12-03 Thread Jarret Raim
With the introduction of programs (think: official teams), all incubated/integrated projects must belong to an official program... So when a project applies for incubation but is not part of an official program yet, it de-facto also applies to be considered a program. Ahh, understood. So I guess

Re: [openstack-dev] [Solum] CLI minimal implementation

2013-12-03 Thread Arati Mahimane
Randall, I think you are talking about required parameters and we are talking about optional ones. Please correct me if I am wrong. -Arati On 12/3/13 10:27 AM, Randall Burt randall.b...@rackspace.com wrote: I disagree. If a param is required and has no meaningful default, it should be

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-tc] Incubation Request for Barbican

2013-12-03 Thread Jarret Raim
I think there's something else you should take under consideration. Oslo messaging is not just an OpenStack library. It's the RPC library that all projects are relying on and one of the strong goals we have in OpenStack is to reduce code and efforts duplications. We'd love to have more people

Re: [openstack-dev] [Keystone] Store quotas in Keystone

2013-12-03 Thread John Dickinson
On Dec 3, 2013, at 8:05 AM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote: On 12/03/2013 10:04 AM, John Dickinson wrote: How are you proposing that this integrate with Swift's account and container quotas (especially since there may be hundreds of thousands of accounts and millions (billions?) of

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-tc] Incubation Request for Barbican

2013-12-03 Thread Jarret Raim
The API and developer documentation is at http://docs.openstack.org/developer/oslo.messaging/ This is great, thanks for the link. Would there be any objections to adding this to the github repo and the openstack wiki pages? I spent a bunch of time looking and wasn¹t able to turn this up.

Re: [openstack-dev] [Solum] CLI minimal implementation

2013-12-03 Thread Arati Mahimane
Roshan, I have added some comments to the Etherpad - https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/MinimalCLI -Arati On 12/3/13 10:27 AM, Randall Burt randall.b...@rackspace.com wrote: I disagree. If a param is required and has no meaningful default, it should be positional IMO. I think this actually

Re: [openstack-dev] [Solum] CLI minimal implementation

2013-12-03 Thread Jay Pipes
On 12/03/2013 11:39 AM, Arati Mahimane wrote: Randall, I think you are talking about required parameters and we are talking about optional ones. Please correct me if I am wrong. Russell was specifically talking about required parameters being positional arguments. Best, -jay

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] DHCP Agent Reliability

2013-12-03 Thread Stephen Gran
On 03/12/13 16:08, Maru Newby wrote: I've been investigating a bug that is preventing VM's from receiving IP addresses when a Neutron service is under high load: https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1192381 High load causes the DHCP agent's status updates to be delayed, causing the

[openstack-dev] [horizon] Enhance UX of Launch Instance Form

2013-12-03 Thread Gabriel pettier
Hi there I read the proposal and related documentation, and intend to start implementing it into horizon. Regards on Wed Nov 20 15:09:05 UTC 2013 C?dric Soulas Wrote Thanks for all the feedback on the Enhance UX of launch instance form subject and its prototype. Try the latest version of

[openstack-dev] [neutron] [policy] Neutron Policy IRC meeting

2013-12-03 Thread Mohammad Banikazemi
Hello everybody, Following up the action items from our last meeting and in preparation for our next IRC meeting on Dec 5th (see below), I have started updating the google document [1]. I have added the tables describing the attributes of new Neutron objects. I will be also working on adding a

Re: [openstack-dev] Incubation Request for Barbican

2013-12-03 Thread Joe Gordon
On Dec 3, 2013 6:45 PM, Jarret Raim jarret.r...@rackspace.com wrote: With the introduction of programs (think: official teams), all incubated/integrated projects must belong to an official program... So when a project applies for incubation but is not part of an official program yet, it

Re: [openstack-dev] Plugin Blueprint and ML2 Plugin

2013-12-03 Thread Kyle Mestery (kmestery)
On Dec 3, 2013, at 10:13 AM, NAVEEN R K REDDY naveen.kunare...@gmail.com wrote: Hi All, I have couple of questions wrt to plugin blueprint and ml2 plugin, 1. We are planning to submit the plugin into Openstack Icehouse release. The question we have is there any deadline for the plugin

Re: [openstack-dev] [Keystone] Store quotas in Keystone

2013-12-03 Thread Jay Pipes
On 12/03/2013 11:40 AM, John Dickinson wrote: On Dec 3, 2013, at 8:05 AM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote: On 12/03/2013 10:04 AM, John Dickinson wrote: How are you proposing that this integrate with Swift's account and container quotas (especially since there may be hundreds of

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Vote required for certificate as first-class citizen - SSL Termination (Revised)

2013-12-03 Thread Samuel Bercovici
Hi, The primary reason for the simple proposal is due to the difficult to reach consensus on how SSL certificates can be stored in OpenStack. As there is currently no trusted storage in OpenStack, the simple proposal overcomes this by pushing the SSL certificates into the load balancers which

Re: [openstack-dev] [Solum] CLI minimal implementation

2013-12-03 Thread Dean Troyer
On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 10:09 PM, Adrian Otto adrian.o...@rackspace.comwrote: Sorry, I changed the link. We originally started with hyphenated noun-verbs but switched to the current proposal upon receipt of advice that it would be more compatible with the next version of the cliff based CLI

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][heat][[keystone] RFC: introducing request identification

2013-12-03 Thread Adam Young
On 11/27/2013 12:45 AM, Takahiro Shida wrote: Hi all, I'm also interested in this issue. Create a unified request identifier https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/cross-service-request-id I checked this BP and the following review. https://review.openstack.org/#/c/29480/ There are

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-tc] Incubation Request for Barbican

2013-12-03 Thread Jeremy Stanley
On 2013-12-03 16:43:32 + (+), Jarret Raim wrote: This is great, thanks for the link. Would there be any objections to adding this to the github repo I think you meant the git repo. What's a gi-thub? URL: http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/oslo.messaging/tree/doc/source/ and the

Re: [openstack-dev] [Keystone] Store quotas in Keystone

2013-12-03 Thread Joe Gordon
On Dec 3, 2013 6:49 PM, John Dickinson m...@not.mn wrote: On Dec 3, 2013, at 8:05 AM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote: On 12/03/2013 10:04 AM, John Dickinson wrote: How are you proposing that this integrate with Swift's account and container quotas (especially since there may be

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Schduler] Volunteers wanted for a modest proposal for an external scheduler in our lifetime

2013-12-03 Thread Russell Bryant
On 12/03/2013 07:22 AM, Boris Pavlovic wrote: Hi all, Finally found a bit time to write my thoughts. There are few blockers that make really complex to build scheduler as a services or even to move main part of scheduler code to separated lib. We already have one unsuccessfully effort

Re: [openstack-dev] welcoming new committers

2013-12-03 Thread Stefano Maffulli
On 10/31/2013 11:49 AM, Stefano Maffulli wrote: Another idea that Tom suggested is to use gerrit automation to send back to first time committers something in addition to the normal 'your patch is waiting for review' message. The message could be something like: [...] Tom sent a patch for

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-tc] Incubation Request for Barbican

2013-12-03 Thread Russell Bryant
On 12/03/2013 11:40 AM, Jarret Raim wrote: I think there's something else you should take under consideration. Oslo messaging is not just an OpenStack library. It's the RPC library that all projects are relying on and one of the strong goals we have in OpenStack is to reduce code and efforts

Re: [openstack-dev] [Solum] CLI minimal implementation

2013-12-03 Thread Russell Bryant
On 12/03/2013 11:45 AM, Jay Pipes wrote: On 12/03/2013 11:39 AM, Arati Mahimane wrote: Randall, I think you are talking about required parameters and we are talking about optional ones. Please correct me if I am wrong. Russell was specifically talking about required parameters being

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-tc] Incubation Request for Barbican

2013-12-03 Thread Russell Bryant
On 12/03/2013 01:26 PM, Russell Bryant wrote: Unless the requirements change, so far it looks like this request should be deferred a bit longer. And note that this is just my opinion, and note a statement of position on behalf of the entire TC. We can still officially consider the request at

Re: [openstack-dev] Tool for detecting commonly misspelled words

2013-12-03 Thread Nachi Ueno
Great tool especially for non-native guys such as me! Thanks Joe Best Nachi 2013/12/3 Sylvain Bauza sylvain.ba...@gmail.com: Great tool ! Just discovered that openstack.common.rpc does have typos, another good reason to migrate to oslo.messaging.rpc :-) -Sylvain 2013/12/3 Joe Gordon

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][heat][[keystone] RFC: introducing request identification

2013-12-03 Thread Andrew Laski
On 11/29/13 at 03:56pm, haruka tanizawa wrote: Thank you for your reply. I completely misunderstood. You're correct on request_id and task_id. What I'm planning is a string field that a user can pass in with the request and it will be part of the task representation. That field will have no

Re: [openstack-dev] Tool for detecting commonly misspelled words

2013-12-03 Thread Russell Bryant
On 12/03/2013 09:22 AM, Joe Gordon wrote: HI all, Recently I have seen a few patches fixing a few typos. I would like to point out a really nifty tool to detect commonly misspelled words. So next time you want to fix a typo, instead of just fixing a single one you can go ahead and fix a

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Schduler] Volunteers wanted for a modest proposal for an external scheduler in our lifetime

2013-12-03 Thread Debojyoti Dutta
I agree with RussellB on this … if the forklift's goal is to just separate the scheduler, there should be no new features etc till the forklift is done and it should work as is with very minor config changes. A scheduler has several features like place resources correctly, for example. Ideally,

Re: [openstack-dev] Tool for detecting commonly misspelled words

2013-12-03 Thread John Griffith
On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 11:38 AM, Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com wrote: On 12/03/2013 09:22 AM, Joe Gordon wrote: HI all, Recently I have seen a few patches fixing a few typos. I would like to point out a really nifty tool to detect commonly misspelled words. So next time you want to fix

Re: [openstack-dev] Tool for detecting commonly misspelled words

2013-12-03 Thread Nachi Ueno
2013/12/3 John Griffith john.griff...@solidfire.com: On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 11:38 AM, Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com wrote: On 12/03/2013 09:22 AM, Joe Gordon wrote: HI all, Recently I have seen a few patches fixing a few typos. I would like to point out a really nifty tool to detect

Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon] Enhance UX of Launch Instance Form

2013-12-03 Thread Gabriel pettier
(Previous mail went out a bit fast) These features could be developed iteratively to improve upon the existing code base: - First allow the modal view system to expand for better usage of screen real-estate combined with responsiveness of the whole popin - Then rework existing menus to

Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon] Enhance UX of Launch Instance Form

2013-12-03 Thread Gabriel Pettier
(Previous mail went out a bit fast) These features could be developed iteratively to improve upon the existing code base: - First allow the modal view system to expand for better usage of screen real-estate combined with responsiveness of the whole popin - Then rework existing menus to

Re: [openstack-dev] Tool for detecting commonly misspelled words

2013-12-03 Thread John Griffith
On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 11:54 AM, Nachi Ueno na...@ntti3.com wrote: 2013/12/3 John Griffith john.griff...@solidfire.com: On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 11:38 AM, Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com wrote: On 12/03/2013 09:22 AM, Joe Gordon wrote: HI all, Recently I have seen a few patches fixing a few

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Schduler] Volunteers wanted for a modest proposal for an external scheduler in our lifetime

2013-12-03 Thread Yathiraj Udupi (yudupi)
I totally agree on this meta level scheduler aspect. This should separate the placement decision making logic (for resources of any type, but can start on Nova resources) from their actual creation, say VM creation. This way the placement decisions can be relayed to the individual components

Re: [openstack-dev] Tool for detecting commonly misspelled words

2013-12-03 Thread Joe Gordon
On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 10:46 AM, John Griffith john.griff...@solidfire.comwrote: On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 11:38 AM, Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com wrote: On 12/03/2013 09:22 AM, Joe Gordon wrote: HI all, Recently I have seen a few patches fixing a few typos. I would like to point

Re: [openstack-dev] Tool for detecting commonly misspelled words

2013-12-03 Thread Nachi Ueno
2013/12/3 John Griffith john.griff...@solidfire.com: On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 11:54 AM, Nachi Ueno na...@ntti3.com wrote: 2013/12/3 John Griffith john.griff...@solidfire.com: On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 11:38 AM, Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com wrote: On 12/03/2013 09:22 AM, Joe Gordon wrote: HI

Re: [openstack-dev] Tool for detecting commonly misspelled words

2013-12-03 Thread John Griffith
On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 12:18 PM, Nachi Ueno na...@ntti3.com wrote: 2013/12/3 John Griffith john.griff...@solidfire.com: On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 11:54 AM, Nachi Ueno na...@ntti3.com wrote: 2013/12/3 John Griffith john.griff...@solidfire.com: On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 11:38 AM, Russell Bryant

[openstack-dev] [savanna] neutron floating IP assignment unexpected

2013-12-03 Thread Jon Maron
Hi, I have the following configuration in savanna.conf: # If set to True, Savanna will use floating IPs to communicate # with instances. To make sure that all instances have # floating IPs assigned in Nova Network set # auto_assign_floating_ip=True in nova.conf.If Neutron is # used for

  1   2   >