Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] New API requirements, review of GCE

2013-12-04 Thread Christopher Yeoh
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 5:22 PM, Alexandre Levine alev...@cloudscaling.comwrote: It is not a problem to update the code in given direction when the decision is made. As I understood right now it's not about the code - that's why I'd canceled the code review until the blueprint is accepted -

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][heat][[keystone] RFC: introducing request identification

2013-12-04 Thread haruka tanizawa
Thank you for your reply. I chould understand instance-tasks-api more clearly. 2013/12/4 Andrew Laski andrew.la...@rackspace.com This is something that's entirely contained within Nova. It's just adding a different representation of what is already occurring with task_states on an

[openstack-dev] [Glance] Anybody working on bug 1251055?

2013-12-04 Thread David koo
Hi All, Bug 1251055 was taken on 14th Nov but there seems to have been no activity since then (no fixed proposed). I think I have a fix for this and would like to upload the fix but is it acceptable to do so when the bug is assigned to somebody else? Can I just assign it to myself and upload

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-tc] [barbican] Curious about oslo.messaging (from Incubation Request for Barbican)

2013-12-04 Thread Sylvain Bauza
Le 04/12/2013 06:01, John Wood a écrit : I was curious if there is an OpenStack project that would be a good example to follow as we convert Barbican over to oslo messaging. I've been examining existing OpenStack projects such as Ceilometer and Keystone to see how they are utilizing oslo

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] Service scoped role definition

2013-12-04 Thread David Chadwick
I am happy with this as far as it goes. I would like to see it being made more general, where domains, services and projects can also own and name roles regards David On 04/12/2013 01:51, Adam Young wrote: I've been thinking about your comment that nested roles are confusing What if we

Re: [openstack-dev] [Oslo] Layering olso.messaging usage of config

2013-12-04 Thread Julien Danjou
On Tue, Dec 03 2013, Joshua Harlow wrote: Another question that¹s come up recently. Python 3.3 support? Will oslo.messaging achieve that? Maybe its a later goal, but it seems like one that is required (and should almost be expected of new libraries imho). Thoughts? Seems to be mainly eventlet

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-tc] [barbican] Curious about oslo.messaging (from Incubation Request for Barbican)

2013-12-04 Thread Mark McLoughlin
On Wed, 2013-12-04 at 05:01 +, John Wood wrote: Hello folks, I was curious if there is an OpenStack project that would be a good example to follow as we convert Barbican over to oslo messaging. I've been examining existing OpenStack projects such as Ceilometer and Keystone to see how

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] Service scoped role definition

2013-12-04 Thread David Chadwick
I have added comments 111 to 122 david On 03/12/2013 23:58, Tiwari, Arvind wrote: Hi David, I have added my comments underneath line # 97 till line #110, it is mostly aligned with your proposal with some modification. https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/service-scoped-role-definition

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] New API requirements, review of GCE

2013-12-04 Thread Alexandre Levine
04.12.2013 11:57, Christopher Yeoh ?: On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 5:22 PM, Alexandre Levine alev...@cloudscaling.com mailto:alev...@cloudscaling.com wrote: It is not a problem to update the code in given direction when the decision is made. As I understood right now it's not about the

[openstack-dev] [Openstack][qa][Tempest][Network][Neutron] tenant_networks_reachable

2013-12-04 Thread Yair Fried
Hi In tempest.conf, Is the parameter tenant_networks_reachable affected by anything other than neutron using ip name-spaces (which is the default setting) or not, and if not using it - if the tempest host is the same as the neutron server host? Regards Yair Fried

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] Anybody working on bug 1251055?

2013-12-04 Thread Flavio Percoco
On 04/12/13 08:19 +, David koo wrote: Hi All, Bug 1251055 was taken on 14th Nov but there seems to have been no activity since then (no fixed proposed). I think I have a fix for this and would like to upload the fix but is it acceptable to do so when the bug is assigned to somebody else?

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Tuning QueuePool parameters?

2013-12-04 Thread Salvatore Orlando
I think this bug was considered fixed because at the time once the patch addressing was merged, the bug automatically went into fix committed. It should therefore be re-opened. Even if tweaking sql pool parameters avoids the issue, this should be considered more of a mitigation rather than a

Re: [openstack-dev] [Oslo] Layering olso.messaging usage of config

2013-12-04 Thread Flavio Percoco
On 04/12/13 10:14 +0100, Julien Danjou wrote: On Tue, Dec 03 2013, Joshua Harlow wrote: Another question that¹s come up recently. Python 3.3 support? Will oslo.messaging achieve that? Maybe its a later goal, but it seems like one that is required (and should almost be expected of new libraries

[openstack-dev] [Nova] Core sponsors wanted for BP user defined shutdown

2013-12-04 Thread Day, Phil
Hi Nova cores, As per the discussion at the Summit I need two (or more) nova cores to sponsor the BP that allows Guests a chance to shutdown cleanly rather than just yanking the virtual power cord out -which is approved and targeted for I2 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/35303/ The Non API

Re: [openstack-dev] When should things get added to Oslo.Incubator

2013-12-04 Thread Flavio Percoco
On 04/12/13 01:13 +, Adrian Otto wrote: Jay is right. What we have is probably close enough to what's in Nova to qualify for oslo-incubator. The simplifications seem to me to have general appeal so this code would be more attractive to other projects. One worry I have is that there is

[openstack-dev] [Neutron] ML2 improvement, more extensible and more modular

2013-12-04 Thread Zang MingJie
Hi, all: I have already written a patch[1] which makes ml2 segment more extensible, where segments can contains more fields other than physical network and segmentation id, but there is still a lot of work to do to make the ml2 more extensible. Here are some of my thoughts. First, introduce a

Re: [openstack-dev] [Tripleo] Core reviewer update Dec

2013-12-04 Thread Jiri Tomasek
Hi, As the development of Tuskar-UI somehow stagnated recently, I have been focusing more on Horizon project lately to get features we need for Tuskar-UI. I acknowledge that I haven't been paying enough attention and reviews in TripleO. The statistics says it all. Although as the development

[openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Vendor feedback needed

2013-12-04 Thread Eugene Nikanorov
Hi load balancing vendors! I have specific question: how drivers for your solutions (devices/vms/processes) are going to wire a VIP with external and tenant networks? As we're working on creating a suite for third-party testing, we would like to make sure that scenarios that we create fits usage

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] DHCP Agent Reliability

2013-12-04 Thread Joe Gordon
On Dec 4, 2013 5:41 AM, Maru Newby ma...@redhat.com wrote: On Dec 4, 2013, at 11:57 AM, Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com wrote: Excerpts from Maru Newby's message of 2013-12-03 08:08:09 -0800: I've been investigating a bug that is preventing VM's from receiving IP addresses when a Neutron

[openstack-dev] Advanced validation of config options

2013-12-04 Thread Maxim Kulkin
Hi guys. There was a blueprint on adding advanced validation for configuration options: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/oslo/+spec/oslo-config-options-validation I'm glad to announce that I have finished implementation for that and I invite everybody interested for a review:

[openstack-dev] [Tempest] Which is the best way for skipping tests?

2013-12-04 Thread Daisuke Morita
Hi, everyone. Which do you think is the best way of coding test skipping, writing cls.skipException statement in setUpClass method or skipIf annotation for each test method ? This question comes to me in reviewing https://review.openstack.org/#/c/59759/ . I think that work itself is great and I

Re: [openstack-dev] creating a default for oslo config variables within a project?

2013-12-04 Thread Sean Dague
On 12/03/2013 11:21 PM, Clint Byrum wrote: Excerpts from Sean Dague's message of 2013-12-03 16:05:47 -0800: On 12/03/2013 06:13 PM, Ben Nemec wrote: On 2013-12-03 17:09, Sean Dague wrote: On 12/03/2013 05:50 PM, Mark McLoughlin wrote: On Tue, 2013-12-03 at 16:23 -0600, Ben Nemec wrote: On

[openstack-dev] stable/havana 2013.2.1 freeze tomorrow

2013-12-04 Thread Alan Pevec
Hi, first stable/havana release 2013.2.1 is scheduled[1] to be released next week on December 12th, so freeze on stable/havana goes into effect tomorrow EOD, one week before the release. Everybody is welcome to help review proposed changes[2] taking into account criteria for stable fixes[3].

Re: [openstack-dev] [Tempest] Which is the best way for skipping tests?

2013-12-04 Thread Sean Dague
I agree, preference should be to the function level skip vs. the class exception. Especially as I have some sample fixture code from Robert that will remove setUpClass in the future (we do have a long term goal of getting rid of it in favor of proper fixtures). It also gives us an actual count of

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-tc] Incubation Request for Barbican

2013-12-04 Thread Jarret Raim
I think this conversation has gotten away from our incubation request and into an argument about what makes a good library and when and how projects should choose between oslo and other options. I¹m happy to have the second one in another thread, but that seems like a longer conversation

[openstack-dev] Top Gate Bugs

2013-12-04 Thread Joe Gordon
TL;DR: Gate is failing 23% of the time due to bugs in nova, neutron and tempest. We need help fixing these bugs. Hi All, Before going any further we have a bug that is affecting gate and stable, so its getting top priority here. elastic-recheck currently doesn't track unit tests because we

Re: [openstack-dev] Multidomain User Ids

2013-12-04 Thread Dolph Mathews
On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 9:39 PM, Adam Young ayo...@redhat.com wrote: The #1 pain point I hear from people in the field is that they need to consume read only LDAP but have service users in something Keystone specific. We are close to having this, but we have not closed the loop. This was

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][database] Update compute_nodes table

2013-12-04 Thread Murray, Paul (HP Cloud Services)
Hi Abbass, I guess you read the blueprint Russell referred to. I think you actually are saying the same - but please read steps below and tell me if they don't cover what you want. This is what it will do: 1. Add a column to the compute_nodes table for a JSON blob 2. Add plug-in

Re: [openstack-dev] Incubation Request for Barbican

2013-12-04 Thread Jarret Raim
While I am all for adding a new program, I think we should only add one if we rule out all existing programs as a home. With that in mind why not add this to the keystone program? Perhaps that may require a tweak to keystones mission statement, but that is doable. I saw a partial answer

[openstack-dev] [neutron] Creating recipes for mimicking behavior of nova-networking network managers.

2013-12-04 Thread Brent Eagles
Hi, As part of the Icehouse nova-networking parity effort, we need to describe how nova-networking managers work and how the behavior is mapped to neutron. The benefits are: 1. It aides migration: deployers who are nova-network savvy can see how functionality maps from one to the other.

Re: [openstack-dev] [Tripleo] Core reviewer update Dec

2013-12-04 Thread Jordan OMara
On 04/12/13 12:07 +0100, Jiri Tomasek wrote: Hi, As the development of Tuskar-UI somehow stagnated recently, I have been focusing more on Horizon project lately to get features we need for Tuskar-UI. I acknowledge that I haven't been paying enough attention and reviews in TripleO. The

Re: [openstack-dev] [Tempest] Which is the best way for skipping tests?

2013-12-04 Thread Joe Hakim Rahme
I am in favor of class level exceptions for the obvious reasons: + It reduces code duplication. Copy/pasting a SkipIf decorator on every test method in the class is tedious and possibly error prone. Adding the exception as a guard in the setUpClass() makes for a more elegant solution +

[openstack-dev] [All] Status oslo.messaging migration

2013-12-04 Thread Flavio Percoco
Greetings, I'd like to give a heads up about the status of the migration to oslo.messaging. Glance migration to oslo.messaging just landed and it'll be part of the I-1 cut. Remaining projects are: - Nova - Cinder - Trove - Keystone - Heat - Ceilometer - Neutron - Horizon I know most of the

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] DHCP Agent Reliability

2013-12-04 Thread Maru Newby
On Dec 4, 2013, at 8:55 AM, Carl Baldwin c...@ecbaldwin.net wrote: Stephen, all, I agree that there may be some opportunity to split things out a bit. However, I'm not sure what the best way will be. I recall that Mark mentioned breaking out the processes that handle API requests and RPC

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] Service scoped role definition

2013-12-04 Thread Adam Young
On 12/04/2013 04:08 AM, David Chadwick wrote: I am happy with this as far as it goes. I would like to see it being made more general, where domains, services and projects can also own and name roles Domains should be OK, but services would confuse the matter. You'd have to end up with

[openstack-dev] [Swift] python-swiftclient, verifying SSL certs by default

2013-12-04 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah
Hello, There has been a lengthy discussion going on for quite sometime on a review for swiftclient here : https://review.openstack.org/#/c/33473/ The review change the way works swiftclient to refuse to connect to insecure (i.e: self signed) SSL swift proxies unless you are specifying the

[openstack-dev] Icehouse-1 milestone candidates available

2013-12-04 Thread Thierry Carrez
Hi everyone, Milestone-proposed branches were created for Keystone, Glance, Nova, Horizon, Neutron, Cinder, Ceilometer, Heat and and Trove in preparation for the icehouse-1 milestone publication tomorrow. During this milestone (since the opening of the Icehouse development cycle) we implemented

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Vendor feedback needed

2013-12-04 Thread Samuel Bercovici
Hi Eugene, We currently support out-of-the-box VIP and Nodes on the same network. The VIP can be associated with a floating IP if need to access from the external network. We are considering other options but will address as we get to this. Regards, -Sam. From: Eugene

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic] functional (aka integration) gate testing

2013-12-04 Thread Vladimir Kozhukalov
Some additional information about the case. Infra at the moment has a limitation in one VM per jenkins job. So we are not able to launch two VMs and boot one of them via PXE from another. We need to start VM and then start another nested VM inside first one. Besides, nested VM must be qemu, not

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][IPv6] Webex Recording of IPv6 / Neutron Sync-up

2013-12-04 Thread Richard Woo
and integrate it with the L3 agent efforts brought by Shixiong and Randy. Please see below for Webex recording. https://cisco.webex.com/ciscosales/lsr.php?AT=pbSP=MCrID=73520027rKey=8e508b63604bb9d0 IPv6 / Neutron synch-up-20131204 0204-1 Tuesday, December 3, 2013 9:04 pm New York Time 1 Hour 4

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][IPv6] Webex Recording of IPv6 / Neutron Sync-up

2013-12-04 Thread Ian Wells
recording. https://cisco.webex.com/ciscosales/lsr.php?AT=pbSP=MCrID=73520027rKey=8e508b63604bb9d0 IPv6 / Neutron synch-up-20131204 0204-1 Tuesday, December 3, 2013 9:04 pm New York Time 1 Hour 4 Minutes Thanks! Shixiong ___ OpenStack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [Tripleo] Core reviewer update Dec

2013-12-04 Thread Chris Jones
Hi On 4 December 2013 07:12, Robert Collins robe...@robertcollins.net wrote: - Ghe Rivero for -core +1 - Jan Provaznik for removal from -core - Jordan O'Mara for removal from -core - Martyn Taylor for removal from -core - Jiri Tomasek for removal from -core - Jamomir Coufal for

Re: [openstack-dev] [Tempest] Which is the best way for skipping tests?

2013-12-04 Thread Sean Dague
On 12/04/2013 09:24 AM, Joe Hakim Rahme wrote: I am in favor of class level exceptions for the obvious reasons: + It reduces code duplication. Copy/pasting a SkipIf decorator on every test method in the class is tedious and possibly error prone. Adding the exception as a guard in the

Re: [openstack-dev] [ceilometer] [marconi] Notifications brainstorming session tomorrow @ 1500 UTC

2013-12-04 Thread Kurt Griffiths
Thanks! We touched on this briefly during the chat yesterday, and I will make sure it gets further attention. On 12/3/13, 3:54 AM, Julien Danjou jul...@danjou.info wrote: On Mon, Dec 02 2013, Kurt Griffiths wrote: Following up on some conversations we had at the summit, I¹d like to get folks

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] DHCP Agent Reliability

2013-12-04 Thread Ashok Kumaran
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 8:30 PM, Maru Newby ma...@redhat.com wrote: On Dec 4, 2013, at 8:55 AM, Carl Baldwin c...@ecbaldwin.net wrote: Stephen, all, I agree that there may be some opportunity to split things out a bit. However, I'm not sure what the best way will be. I recall that Mark

Re: [openstack-dev] [marconi] New meeting time

2013-12-04 Thread Kurt Griffiths
Sorry to change things up again, but it’s been requested that we move our meeting to Tuesday at 1500 UTC instead of Monday, since a lot of people’s Mondays are crazy busy as it is. Unless anyone objects, let’s plan on doing that starting with our next meeting (Dec 10). On 11/25/13, 6:22 PM, Kurt

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Do we have some guidelines for mock, stub, mox when writing unit test?

2013-12-04 Thread Nikola Đipanov
On 11/19/2013 05:52 PM, Peter Feiner wrote: On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 11:19 AM, Chuck Short chuck.sh...@canonical.com wrote: Hi On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 10:43 AM, Peter Feiner pe...@gridcentric.ca wrote: A substantive reason for switching from mox to mock is the derelict state of mox

Re: [openstack-dev] [Hacking] License headers in empty files

2013-12-04 Thread Ben Nemec
On 2013-12-02 11:37, Julien Danjou wrote: On Thu, Nov 28 2013, Julien Danjou wrote: On Thu, Nov 28 2013, Sean Dague wrote: I'm totally in favor of going further and saying empty files shouldn't have license headers, because their content of emptiness isn't copyrightable [1]. That's just not

Re: [openstack-dev] [Tempest] Which is the best way for skipping tests?

2013-12-04 Thread Joe Hakim Rahme
On 04 Dec 2013, at 17:05, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote: That will require someone signing up to writing that though. I could do that. Since you know the code better than me, can you confirm that tempest/test.py is the best place to define this decorator? Thanks. --- Joe H. Rahme

Re: [openstack-dev] [ceilometer] [marconi] Notifications brainstorming session tomorrow @ 1500 UTC

2013-12-04 Thread Ian Wells
How frequent do you imagine these notifications being? There's a wide variation here between the 'blue moon' case where disk space is low and frequent notifications of things like OS performance, which you might want to display in Horizon or another monitoring tool on an every-few-seconds basis,

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Interfaces file format, was [Tempest] Need to prepare the IPv6 environment for static IPv6 injection test case

2013-12-04 Thread Ian Wells
We seem to have bound our config drive file formats to those used by the operating system we're running, which doesn't seem like the right approach to take. Firstly, the above format doesn't actually work even for Debian-based systems - if you have a network without ipv6, ipv6 ND will be enabled

Re: [openstack-dev] [Tempest] Which is the best way for skipping tests?

2013-12-04 Thread Sean Dague
On 12/04/2013 11:32 AM, Joe Hakim Rahme wrote: On 04 Dec 2013, at 17:05, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote: That will require someone signing up to writing that though. I could do that. Since you know the code better than me, can you confirm that tempest/test.py is the best place to define

[openstack-dev] [nova]:packing-filter-scheduler

2013-12-04 Thread Digambar Patil
Hi Russell, Thank you for your inputs on launchpad. Can you tell me what is exactly expected in-terms of design detail, so I can ensure that I send you the correct details in the first go itself. Best Regards, Digambar ___ OpenStack-dev mailing

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova]:packing-filter-scheduler

2013-12-04 Thread Russell Bryant
On 12/04/2013 11:58 AM, Digambar Patil wrote: Hi Russell, Thank you for your inputs on launchpad. Can you tell me what is exactly expected in-terms of design detail, so I can ensure that I send you the correct details in the first go itself. It looked like you described a scheduling

Re: [openstack-dev] creating a default for oslo config variables within a project?

2013-12-04 Thread Ben Nemec
On 2013-12-04 06:07, Sean Dague wrote: On 12/03/2013 11:21 PM, Clint Byrum wrote: Excerpts from Sean Dague's message of 2013-12-03 16:05:47 -0800: On 12/03/2013 06:13 PM, Ben Nemec wrote: On 2013-12-03 17:09, Sean Dague wrote: On 12/03/2013 05:50 PM, Mark McLoughlin wrote: On Tue,

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Do we have some guidelines for mock, stub, mox when writing unit test?

2013-12-04 Thread Russell Bryant
On 12/04/2013 11:16 AM, Nikola Đipanov wrote: Resurrecting this thread because of an interesting review that came up yesterday [1]. It seems that our lack of a firm decision on what to do with the mocking framework has left people confused. In hope to help - I'll give my view of where

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Do we have some guidelines for mock, stub, mox when writing unit test?

2013-12-04 Thread Peter Feiner
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 11:16 AM, Nikola Đipanov ndipa...@redhat.com wrote: 1) Figure out what is the deal with mox3 and decide if owning it will really be less trouble than porting nova. To be hones - I was unable to even find the code repo for it, only [3]. If anyone has more info - please

[openstack-dev] [Neutron] Calling a controller from within a session in the plugin

2013-12-04 Thread Mohammad Banikazemi
Have a question regarding calling an external SDN controller in a plugin. The ML2 model brings up the fact that it is preferred not to call an external controller within a database session by splitting up each call into two calls: *_precommit and *_postcommit. Makes sense. Looking at the

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] Service scoped role definition

2013-12-04 Thread Tiwari, Arvind
Hi Adam, I have added my comments in line. As per my request yesterday and David's proposal, following role-def data model is looks generic enough and seems innovative to accommodate future extensions. { role: { id: 76e72a, name: admin, (you can give whatever name you like)

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] Service scoped role definition

2013-12-04 Thread Tiwari, Arvind
Hi David, Thanks for your valuable comments. I have updated https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/service-scoped-role-definition line #118 explaining the rationale behind the field. I wd also appreciate your thoughts on https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/1Uiwcbfpxq too, which is support

Re: [openstack-dev] Multidomain User Ids

2013-12-04 Thread Henry Nash
On 4 Dec 2013, at 13:28, Dolph Mathews dolph.math...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 9:39 PM, Adam Young ayo...@redhat.com wrote: The #1 pain point I hear from people in the field is that they need to consume read only LDAP but have service users in something Keystone specific.

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] Service scoped role definition

2013-12-04 Thread David Chadwick
Hi Adam I understand your problem: having projects and services which have the same name, then the lineage of a role containing this name is not deterministically known without some other rule or syntax that can differentiate between the two. Since domains contain projects which contain services

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Do we have some guidelines for mock, stub, mox when writing unit test?

2013-12-04 Thread Nikola Đipanov
On 12/04/2013 06:15 PM, Peter Feiner wrote: On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 11:16 AM, Nikola Đipanov ndipa...@redhat.com wrote: 1) Figure out what is the deal with mox3 and decide if owning it will really be less trouble than porting nova. To be hones - I was unable to even find the code repo for it,

Re: [openstack-dev] [Tripleo] Core reviewer update Dec

2013-12-04 Thread James Slagle
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 2:12 AM, Robert Collins robe...@robertcollins.net wrote: In this months review: - Ghe Rivero for -core +1. Has been doing very good reviews. - Jan Provaznik for removal from -core - Jordan O'Mara for removal from -core - Martyn Taylor for removal from -core -

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Do we have some guidelines for mock, stub, mox when writing unit test?

2013-12-04 Thread Chuck Short
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 11:16 AM, Nikola Đipanov ndipa...@redhat.com wrote: On 11/19/2013 05:52 PM, Peter Feiner wrote: On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 11:19 AM, Chuck Short chuck.sh...@canonical.com wrote: Hi On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 10:43 AM, Peter Feiner pe...@gridcentric.ca wrote: A

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] Service scoped role definition

2013-12-04 Thread David Chadwick
On 04/12/2013 17:28, Tiwari, Arvind wrote: Hi David, Thanks for your valuable comments. I have updated https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/service-scoped-role-definition line #118 explaining the rationale behind the field. #119 for my reply I wd also appreciate your thoughts on

Re: [openstack-dev] creating a default for oslo config variables within a project?

2013-12-04 Thread Sean Dague
On 12/04/2013 11:56 AM, Ben Nemec wrote: On 2013-12-04 06:07, Sean Dague wrote: On 12/03/2013 11:21 PM, Clint Byrum wrote: Excerpts from Sean Dague's message of 2013-12-03 16:05:47 -0800: On 12/03/2013 06:13 PM, Ben Nemec wrote: On 2013-12-03 17:09, Sean Dague wrote: On 12/03/2013 05:50 PM,

Re: [openstack-dev] {TripleO] UI Wireframes - close to implementation start

2013-12-04 Thread Liz Blanchard
On Dec 3, 2013, at 9:30 AM, Tzu-Mainn Chen tzuma...@redhat.com wrote: Hey folks, I opened 2 issues on UX discussion forum with TripleO UI topics: Resource Management: http://ask-openstackux.rhcloud.com/question/95/tripleo-ui-resource-management/ - this section was already reviewed

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] Service scoped role definition

2013-12-04 Thread Tiwari, Arvind
Hi David, The biggest problems in my opinion are, 1. We are overloading and adding extra complexities on role name to maintain the generalization for role-def data model. 2. Name spacing the role name is not going to resolve all the issues listed in BP. 3. All the namespaces are derived from

Re: [openstack-dev] [Tripleo] Core reviewer update Dec

2013-12-04 Thread Robert Collins
On 5 December 2013 06:55, James Slagle james.sla...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 2:12 AM, Robert Collins Jan, Jordan, Martyn, Jiri and Jaromir are still actively contributing to TripleO and OpenStack, but I don't think they are tracking / engaging in the code review discussions

Re: [openstack-dev] creating a default for oslo config variables within a project?

2013-12-04 Thread Ben Nemec
On 2013-12-04 12:51, Sean Dague wrote: On 12/04/2013 11:56 AM, Ben Nemec wrote: On 2013-12-04 06:07, Sean Dague wrote: On 12/03/2013 11:21 PM, Clint Byrum wrote: Excerpts from Sean Dague's message of 2013-12-03 16:05:47 -0800: On 12/03/2013 06:13 PM, Ben Nemec wrote: On 2013-12-03 17:09,

[openstack-dev] [Keystoneclient] [Keystone] Last released version of keystoneclient does not work with python33

2013-12-04 Thread Georgy Okrokvertskhov
Hi, I have failed tests in gate-solum-python33 because kesytoneclient fails to import xmlrpclib. The exact error is: File /home/jenkins/workspace/gate-solum-python33/.tox/py33/lib/python3.3/site-packages/ keystoneclient/openstack/common/jsonutils.py, line 42, in module 2013-11-28 18:27:12.655 |

Re: [openstack-dev] creating a default for oslo config variables within a project?

2013-12-04 Thread Clint Byrum
Excerpts from Sean Dague's message of 2013-12-04 10:51:16 -0800: On 12/04/2013 11:56 AM, Ben Nemec wrote: On 2013-12-04 06:07, Sean Dague wrote: On 12/03/2013 11:21 PM, Clint Byrum wrote: Excerpts from Sean Dague's message of 2013-12-03 16:05:47 -0800: On 12/03/2013 06:13 PM, Ben Nemec

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] Service scoped role definition

2013-12-04 Thread Tiwari, Arvind
Thanks David, Appended line # 119 with my reply. endpoint sounds perfect to me. In a nutshell we are agreeing on following new data model for role-def. { role: { id: 76e72a, name: admin, (you can give whatever name you like) scope: { id: ---id--, (ID should be 1 to 1

Re: [openstack-dev] [Tripleo] Core reviewer update Dec

2013-12-04 Thread Lyle, David
On 5 December 2013 12:10, Robert Collins robe...@robertcollins.net wrote: -snip- That said, perhaps we should review these projects. Tuskar as an API to drive deployment and ops clearly belongs in TripleO - though we need to keep pushing features out of it into more generalised tools

[openstack-dev] [Solum] MySQL Storage Engine

2013-12-04 Thread Paul Montgomery
TLDR: Should Solum log a warning if operators do not use the InnoDB storage engine with MySQL in Solum's control plane? Details: I was looking at: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/57024/ Models.py to be specific. The default storage engine is InnoDB for MySQL which is good. I took a quick

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Vendor feedback needed

2013-12-04 Thread Ivar Lazzaro
Hi Eugene, Right now (before the model change discussed during the summit) our implementation, in regards to your question, can be summarized as follows: - Whenever a Pool is created, a port on the specific subnet/network is created and associated to it; - Whenever a VIP is

Re: [openstack-dev] [Solum] MySQL Storage Engine

2013-12-04 Thread Clayton Coleman
- Original Message - TLDR: Should Solum log a warning if operators do not use the InnoDB storage engine with MySQL in Solum's control plane? Details: I was looking at: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/57024/ Models.py to be specific. The default storage engine is InnoDB for

Re: [openstack-dev] [Tripleo] Core reviewer update Dec

2013-12-04 Thread Keith Basil
On Dec 4, 2013, at 2:44 PM, Lyle, David wrote: On 5 December 2013 12:10, Robert Collins robe...@robertcollins.net wrote: -snip- That said, perhaps we should review these projects. Tuskar as an API to drive deployment and ops clearly belongs in TripleO - though we need to keep pushing

Re: [openstack-dev] [Solum] MySQL Storage Engine

2013-12-04 Thread Clint Byrum
Excerpts from Paul Montgomery's message of 2013-12-04 12:04:06 -0800: TLDR: Should Solum log a warning if operators do not use the InnoDB storage engine with MySQL in Solum's control plane? Details: I was looking at: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/57024/ Models.py to be specific.

Re: [openstack-dev] [Keystoneclient] [Keystone] Last released version of keystoneclient does not work with python33

2013-12-04 Thread Dolph Mathews
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 1:26 PM, Georgy Okrokvertskhov gokrokvertsk...@mirantis.com wrote: Hi, I have failed tests in gate-solum-python33 because kesytoneclient fails to import xmlrpclib. The exact error is: File

Re: [openstack-dev] [Solum] MySQL Storage Engine

2013-12-04 Thread Monty Taylor
On 12/04/2013 03:25 PM, Clint Byrum wrote: Excerpts from Paul Montgomery's message of 2013-12-04 12:04:06 -0800: TLDR: Should Solum log a warning if operators do not use the InnoDB storage engine with MySQL in Solum's control plane? Details: I was looking at:

[openstack-dev] recheck bug # for the django fail

2013-12-04 Thread Sean Dague
For people who's patches got killed earlier today because django 1.6 was allowed into global requirements, please use the following bug for recheck - https://bugs.launchpad.net/horizon/+bug/1257885 The horizon team is working towards 1.6 compatibility, but it's not there yet. This will be a good

Re: [openstack-dev] [Keystoneclient] [Keystone] Last released version of keystoneclient does not work with python33

2013-12-04 Thread Adrian Otto
Dolph, Is anyone already focusing on py33 compatibility for python-keystoneclient? Has that effort been scoped? I'd like to judge whether it's reasonable to expect us to patch it up to be compatible in the near term, or relax our expectations. For Solum, we are trying to make all our code py33

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] Service scoped role definition

2013-12-04 Thread Adam Young
On 12/04/2013 12:40 PM, David Chadwick wrote: Hi Adam I understand your problem: having projects and services which have the same name, then the lineage of a role containing this name is not deterministically known without some other rule or syntax that can differentiate between the two. Since

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone][py3] Usage of httpretty

2013-12-04 Thread Dolph Mathews
Looks like there's some recent progress here: https://github.com/gabrielfalcao/HTTPretty/pull/124 On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 9:30 PM, Morgan Fainberg m...@metacloud.com wrote: I'd be more willing to toss in and help to maintain/fix appropriately on StackForge if that is needed. Though I am

Re: [openstack-dev] [Solum] MySQL Storage Engine

2013-12-04 Thread Adrian Otto
On Dec 4, 2013, at 12:32 PM, Monty Taylor mord...@inaugust.com wrote: On 12/04/2013 03:25 PM, Clint Byrum wrote: Excerpts from Paul Montgomery's message of 2013-12-04 12:04:06 -0800: TLDR: Should Solum log a warning if operators do not use the InnoDB storage engine with MySQL in Solum's

[openstack-dev] [qa] Moving the QA meeting time

2013-12-04 Thread Matthew Treinish
Hi everyone, I'm looking at changing our weekly QA meeting time to make it more globally attendable. Right now the current time of 17:00 UTC doesn't really work for people who live in Asia Pacific timezones. (which includes a third of the current core review team) There are 2 approaches that I

Re: [openstack-dev] [Solum] MySQL Storage Engine

2013-12-04 Thread Paul Czarkowski
On 12/4/13 3:06 PM, Adrian Otto adrian.o...@rackspace.com wrote: On Dec 4, 2013, at 12:32 PM, Monty Taylor mord...@inaugust.com wrote: On 12/04/2013 03:25 PM, Clint Byrum wrote: Excerpts from Paul Montgomery's message of 2013-12-04 12:04:06 -0800: TLDR: Should Solum log a warning if

Re: [openstack-dev] [Solum] MySQL Storage Engine

2013-12-04 Thread Paul Montgomery
With the comments that we've received, I would recommend that Clayton remove the option to select the MySQL storage engine from Oslo config and just hardcode InnoDB. I believe it entails just removing a few lines of code. It doesn't sound like anyone has a reason to use any other storage engine

[openstack-dev] [Solum] Unicode strings in Python3

2013-12-04 Thread Georgy Okrokvertskhov
Hi, I am working on unit tests for Solum as a side effect of new unit tests I found that we use unicode strings in the way which is not compatible with python3. Here is an exception form python3 gate: Server-side error: global name 'unicode' is not defined. Detail: 2013-12-04 Traceback (most

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] DHCP Agent Reliability

2013-12-04 Thread Carl Baldwin
Sorry to have taken the discussion on a slight tangent. I meant only to offer the solution as a stop-gap. I agree that the fundamental problem should still be addressed. On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 8:01 PM, Maru Newby ma...@redhat.com wrote: On Dec 4, 2013, at 1:47 AM, Stephen Gran

Re: [openstack-dev] [Solum] MySQL Storage Engine

2013-12-04 Thread Clayton Coleman
- Original Message - With the comments that we've received, I would recommend that Clayton remove the option to select the MySQL storage engine from Oslo config and just hardcode InnoDB. I believe it entails just removing a few lines of code. It doesn't sound like anyone has a reason

Re: [openstack-dev] [Solum] Unicode strings in Python3

2013-12-04 Thread Adrian Otto
Am I interpreting this to mean that WSME is calling unicode()? On Dec 4, 2013, at 1:32 PM, Georgy Okrokvertskhov gokrokvertsk...@mirantis.commailto:gokrokvertsk...@mirantis.com wrote: Hi, I am working on unit tests for Solum as a side effect of new unit tests I found that we use unicode

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] DHCP Agent Reliability

2013-12-04 Thread Carl Baldwin
I have offered up https://review.openstack.org/#/c/60082/ as a backport to Havana. Interest was expressed in the blueprint for doing this even before this thread. If there is consensus for this as the stop-gap then it is there for the merging. However, I do not want to discourage discussion of

Re: [openstack-dev] [qa] Moving the QA meeting time

2013-12-04 Thread Miguel Lavalle
Matt, 2200 UTC Wed. or Thurs. is fine with me Cheers On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 3:04 PM, Matthew Treinish mtrein...@kortar.orgwrote: Hi everyone, I'm looking at changing our weekly QA meeting time to make it more globally attendable. Right now the current time of 17:00 UTC doesn't really work

Re: [openstack-dev] [Solum] Unicode strings in Python3

2013-12-04 Thread Georgy Okrokvertskhov
No, This is Solum code: https://github.com/stackforge/solum/blob/master/solum/api/controllers/v1/assembly.py#L59 Thanks Georgy On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 1:41 PM, Adrian Otto adrian.o...@rackspace.comwrote: Am I interpreting this to mean that WSME is calling unicode()? On Dec 4, 2013, at

Re: [openstack-dev] [Solum] Unicode strings in Python3

2013-12-04 Thread Ben Nemec
I don't think so. It looks like ./solum/api/controllers/v1/assembly.py is calling unicode(). It will need to be changed to six.text_type() for Python 3 compat. -Ben On 2013-12-04 15:41, Adrian Otto wrote: Am I interpreting this to mean that WSME is calling unicode()? On Dec 4, 2013,

Re: [openstack-dev] [Solum] Unicode strings in Python3

2013-12-04 Thread Georgy Okrokvertskhov
I opened a bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/solum/+bug/1257929 for that issue. Ben, thank you for a quick fix proposal. Thanks Georgy On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 1:41 PM, Ben Nemec openst...@nemebean.com wrote: I don't think so. It looks like ./solum/api/controllers/v1/assembly.py is calling

[openstack-dev] [Solumn] Suggestion about usage of mailing lists

2013-12-04 Thread Boris Pavlovic
Guys, I really appreciate that all discussion are real open, and you are doing a great job, discussing all arch stuff of the project. But for such things there are: 1) IRC chats 2) WIKI pages 3) ehterpads E.g. in Rally we have 1 page: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/Rally_Main that contains all

  1   2   >