Re: [openstack-dev] a time-based resource management system

2013-12-17 Thread Tim Bell
There appears to be some overlap of this proposal with 'climate' which provides a resource reservation system. They meet regularly ... see https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Climate for contacts. Tim From: Alan Tan [mailto:y...@students.waikato.ac.nz] Sent: 16 December 2013 23:42 To:

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] [Horizon] [Tuskar] [UI] Horizon and Tuskar-UI merge

2013-12-17 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 12/16/2013 10:32 PM, Jaromir Coufal wrote: This is important note. From information architecture and user interaction point of view, I don't think it makes sense to keep all the three tabs visible together (Project, Admin, Infrastructure). There are lot of reasons, but main points: *

Re: [openstack-dev] a time-based resource management system

2013-12-17 Thread Nikolay Starodubtsev
Hi all I've looked at the wiki page and now I can say that Cafe have an overlap with Climate. Feel free to contact us at #openstack-climate. Also, please take a look at our patches on review.openstack.org: https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:stackforge/climate,n,z Nikolay

Re: [openstack-dev] a time-based resource management system

2013-12-17 Thread Dina Belova
Hi, Alan! I'm really glad you have mentioned that problem, that was not really covered by OpenStack projects for much time. Our (Climate) team is working on implementing Reservation-as-a-Service. As I understand, you are interested in reserving (managing) virtual resources on a time-based

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] [Horizon] [Tuskar] [UI] Horizon and Tuskar-UI merge

2013-12-17 Thread Radomir Dopieralski
On 17/12/13 09:04, Thomas Goirand wrote: On 12/16/2013 10:32 PM, Jaromir Coufal wrote: [snip] So by default, I would say that there should exist Project + Admin tab together or Infrastructure. But never all three together. So when Matthias say 'disabled by default', I would mean completely

[openstack-dev] Glance mod_wsgi.input Question

2013-12-17 Thread Miller, Mark M (EB SW Cloud - RD - Corvallis)
Hello, I am trying to get the Grizzly Glance service working with Apache2 through the WSGI interface. I am having problems with the _upload method of file glance/api/v1/images.py It appears that the req.body_file pointer is invalid as I get the following error: (9, 'Bad file descriptor'). I

Re: [openstack-dev] a time-based resource management system

2013-12-17 Thread Dina Belova
Sorry, forgot to add a link to our Launchpad: https://launchpad.net/climate Thanks! On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 12:27 PM, Dina Belova dbel...@mirantis.com wrote: Hi, Alan! I'm really glad you have mentioned that problem, that was not really covered by OpenStack projects for much time. Our

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] [Horizon] [Tuskar] [UI] Horizon and Tuskar-UI merge

2013-12-17 Thread Matthias Runge
On 12/17/2013 09:04 AM, Thomas Goirand wrote: I think the disabled by default approach is the wrong one. Instead, we should have some users with enough credentials that will have the feature, and others will not. Also, Horizon is a web interface. Most of its switches could be made

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] UI Wireframes for Resource Management - ready for implementation

2013-12-17 Thread Ladislav Smola
On 12/16/2013 08:48 PM, Jay Dobies wrote: On 12/13/2013 01:53 PM, Tzu-Mainn Chen wrote: On 2013/13/12 11:20, Tzu-Mainn Chen wrote: These look good! Quick question - can you explain the purpose of Node Tags? Are they an additional way to filter nodes through nova-scheduler (is that even

[openstack-dev] OS::Metering::Alarm?

2013-12-17 Thread Sebastian Porombka
Hi Folks. I’m currently trying to understand the openstack mechanics in detail (e.g. to fix various ec2 api shortcomings) and reached heat. I tried to add heat to our on-premise installation and failed to try the ‚AutoScalingCeilometer.yaml‘ demo template. Heat-api throwed a ==

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo]: implementing olso.messaging over amqp 1.0

2013-12-17 Thread Flavio Percoco
On 16/12/13 17:14 +, Gordon Sim wrote: I've pasted these into an etherpad[1] for anyone interested. Please feel free to edit/augment etc, or even to query anything on this list. It's really just an initial draft to get the ball rolling. --Gordon [1]

Re: [openstack-dev] OS::Metering::Alarm?

2013-12-17 Thread Dina Belova
As I see on http://docs.openstack.org/developer/heat/template_guide/openstack.html, there is type OS::Ceilometer::Alarm, not OS::Metering::Alarm... Maybe it's somehow connected with your problem? On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 12:59 PM, Sebastian Porombka porom...@uni-paderborn.de wrote: Hi Folks.

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Vote required for certificate as first-class citizen - SSL Termination (Revised)

2013-12-17 Thread Vijay Venkatachalam
Replies Inline! -Original Message- From: Evgeny Fedoruk [mailto:evge...@radware.com] Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2013 5:56 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Vote required for certificate as

Re: [openstack-dev] OS::Metering::Alarm?

2013-12-17 Thread Sebastian Porombka
Hi Dina, hi developers. Thanks for the very very helpful hint. The problem issuing this exception is the lack of /etc/heat/environment.d/default.yaml in the ubuntu cloud reposity packages. root@head2:# cd /etc/heat/ root@head2:/etc/heat# ls -alh environment.d/ total 12K drwxr-xr-x 2 heat

[openstack-dev] Fwd: New feature proposal: send additional headers in API calls

2013-12-17 Thread Yolanda Robla
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi I just wanted to raise a new feature proposal request we are interested in. We are interested in sending additional API calls in headers, in each openstack component. A sample code i created (using keystone as target) is showed on that link:

Re: [openstack-dev] OS::Metering::Alarm?

2013-12-17 Thread Steven Hardy
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 08:59:19AM +, Sebastian Porombka wrote: Hi Folks. I’m currently trying to understand the openstack mechanics in detail (e.g. to fix various ec2 api shortcomings) and reached heat. I tried to add heat to our on-premise installation and failed to try the

Re: [openstack-dev] [governance] Becoming a Program, before applying for incubation

2013-12-17 Thread Flavio Percoco
On 16/12/13 23:49 +, Mark McLoughlin wrote: Hi Thierry, On Fri, 2013-12-13 at 15:53 +0100, Thierry Carrez wrote: Hi everyone, TL;DR: Incubation is getting harder, why not ask efforts to apply for a new program first to get the visibility they need to grow. Long version: Last cycle we

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] UI Wireframes for Resource Management - ready for implementation

2013-12-17 Thread Jaromir Coufal
On 2013/13/12 19:53, Tzu-Mainn Chen wrote: We start easy, so that's solely for UI needs of filtering and monitoring (grouping of nodes). It is already in Ironic, so there is no reason why not to take advantage of it. -- Jarda Okay, great. Just for further clarification, are you expecting this

Re: [openstack-dev] OS::Metering::Alarm?

2013-12-17 Thread Dina Belova
Sebastian, you are welcome :) On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 1:30 PM, Sebastian Porombka porom...@uni-paderborn.de wrote: Hi Dina, hi developers. Thanks for the very very helpful hint. The problem issuing this exception is the lack of /etc/heat/environment.d/default.yaml in the ubuntu cloud

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] UI Wireframes for Resource Management - ready for implementation

2013-12-17 Thread Jaromir Coufal
On 2013/16/12 20:48, Jay Dobies wrote: I might be getting ahead of things, but will the tags be free-form entered by the user, pre-entered in a separate settings and selectable at node register/update time, or locked into a select few that we specify? So what I would expect is completely

[openstack-dev] [TripleO] [Horizon] [Tuskar] [UI] Horizon and Tuskar-UI codebase merge

2013-12-17 Thread Ladislav Smola
Horizoners, As an alternative merge option, we could merge directly to Horizon code base. After some conversation, we have realized that it is possible to mix codebase of incubated and integrated projects, as Trove showed us. Contrary to what was said in the last meeting, we do not require

Re: [openstack-dev] [qa][ceilometer] Who can be a asked to help review tempest tests?

2013-12-17 Thread Nadya Privalova
Hi David, I'm working on tempest tests for Ceilometer too. I think this thread is a good place to make a reminder about our strategy how to avoid duplications in change requests. 1. We have something like a test plan https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/ceilometer-test-plan 2. Ceilometer team's

Re: [openstack-dev] [governance] Becoming a Program, before applying for incubation

2013-12-17 Thread Thierry Carrez
Mark McLoughlin wrote: I'm not totally convinced we need such formality around the TC expressing its support for an early-stage program/project/effort/team. This is a difficult balance. You want to help a number of projects attract more contributors and reach critical mass. For that, they want

Re: [openstack-dev] Fwd: New feature proposal: send additional headers in API calls

2013-12-17 Thread Steven Hardy
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 10:37:05AM +0100, Yolanda Robla wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi I just wanted to raise a new feature proposal request we are interested in. We are interested in sending additional API calls in headers, in each openstack component. A sample

Re: [openstack-dev] [governance] Becoming a Program, before applying for incubation

2013-12-17 Thread Jaromir Coufal
On 2013/16/12 15:19, Flavio Percoco wrote: 1. Programs that are not part of OpenStack's release cycle shouldn't be considered official nor they should have the rights that integrated projects have. I don't agree on this point. There might be supportive teams, which are helping OpenStack in

[openstack-dev] [climate] Meeting minutes

2013-12-17 Thread Dina Belova
Thank everybody who were on our weekly meeting :) Meeting minutes are here: Minutes: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/climate/2013/climate.2013-12-17-09.59.html Minutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/climate/2013/climate.2013-12-17-09.59.txt Log:

Re: [openstack-dev] Fwd: New feature proposal: send additional headers in API calls

2013-12-17 Thread Yolanda Robla
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 We mostly want that to be able to send distro information into Openstack, to be able to collect stats about it. Here is the blueprint for it: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/servercloud-s-server-app-banner-updates El 17/12/13 11:20,

Re: [openstack-dev] [qa][ceilometer] Who can be a asked to help review tempest tests?

2013-12-17 Thread Christopher Yeoh
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 8:33 PM, Nadya Privalova nprival...@mirantis.comwrote: Hi David, I'm working on tempest tests for Ceilometer too. I think this thread is a good place to make a reminder about our strategy how to avoid duplications in change requests. 1. We have something like a test

Re: [openstack-dev] [governance] Becoming a Program, before applying for incubation

2013-12-17 Thread Mark McLoughlin
On Tue, 2013-12-17 at 11:25 +0100, Thierry Carrez wrote: Mark McLoughlin wrote: I'm not totally convinced we need such formality around the TC expressing its support for an early-stage program/project/effort/team. This is a difficult balance. You want to help a number of projects

[openstack-dev] [horizon] Blueprint decrypt-and-display-vm-generated-password

2013-12-17 Thread Ala Rezmerita
Hi all, I would like to get your opinion/feedback about the implementation of the blueprint Decrypt and display VM generated password[1] Our use case is primarily targeting Windows instances with cloudbase-init, but the functionality can be also used on Linux instances. The general idea of

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO][Tuskar] Terminology

2013-12-17 Thread Jaromir Coufal
On 2013/13/12 23:11, Jordan OMara wrote: On 13/12/13 16:20 +1300, Robert Collins wrote: However, on instance - 'instance' is a very well defined term in Nova and thus OpenStack: Nova boot gets you an instance, nova delete gets rid of an instance, nova rebuild recreates it, etc. Instances run

Re: [openstack-dev] [savanna][qa] How will tempest tests run?

2013-12-17 Thread Sergey Lukjanov
Hi, thank you for catching this question. Sure, we'd like to enable Savanna by default for d-g tests. We decided to have a separated jobs now to be able to develop stable enough basic API tests in Tempest to potentially not break gating. So, that's why we have savanna d-g jobs in exp pipeline of

Re: [openstack-dev] Fwd: New feature proposal: send additional headers in API calls

2013-12-17 Thread Steven Hardy
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 12:41:52PM +0100, Yolanda Robla wrote: We mostly want that to be able to send distro information into Openstack, to be able to collect stats about it. Here is the blueprint for it: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/servercloud-s-server-app-banner-updates

[openstack-dev] [Neutron][IPv6] Change I5b2313ff: Create a new attribute for subnets, to store v6 dhcp options

2013-12-17 Thread Shixiong Shang
Hi, guys: I am reading the code in “constants.py” file as part of Change I5b2313ff: Create a new attribute for subnets, to store v6 dhcp options”. One thing captured my eyes is the definition of “RA_MODES”, which excluded “slaac” mode. If my understanding of “RA_MODES” is correct, i.e. the

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] VM diagnostics - V3 proposal

2013-12-17 Thread Gary Kotton
Hi, Following the discussion yesterday I have updated the wiki - please see https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Nova_VM_Diagnostics. The proposal is backwards compatible and will hopefully provide us with the tools to be able to troubleshoot VM issues. Thanks Gary On 12/16/13 5:50 PM, Daniel P.

Re: [openstack-dev] [governance] Becoming a Program, before applying for incubation

2013-12-17 Thread Thierry Carrez
Mark McLoughlin wrote: How about if we had an emerging projects page where the TC feedback on each project would be listed? That would give visibility to our feedback, without making it a yes/no blessing. Ok, whether to list any feedback about the project on the page is a yes/no decision,

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Docker] Environment variables

2013-12-17 Thread Daniel Kuffner
Actually Daniel P. Barrange comment is interesting. He states that a configuration per instance would also be beneficial for Cinder. The configuration is essentially needed to change the bootstrap of the image. If you look at a docker image in abstract way then that is the same thing - a

Re: [openstack-dev] [governance] Becoming a Program, before applying for incubation

2013-12-17 Thread Mark McLoughlin
On Tue, 2013-12-17 at 13:44 +0100, Thierry Carrez wrote: Mark McLoughlin wrote: How about if we had an emerging projects page where the TC feedback on each project would be listed? That would give visibility to our feedback, without making it a yes/no blessing. Ok, whether to list any

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Docker] Environment variables

2013-12-17 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 01:04:33PM -0800, Dan Smith wrote: eg use a 'env_' prefix for glance image attributes We've got a couple of cases now where we want to overrides these same things on a per-instance basis. Kernel command line args is one other example. Other hardware overrides

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo]: implementing olso.messaging over amqp 1.0

2013-12-17 Thread Flavio Percoco
On 16/12/13 10:37 +, Gordon Sim wrote: On 12/12/2013 02:14 PM, Flavio Percoco wrote: I've a draft in my head of how the amqp 1.0 driver could be implemented and how to map the current expectations of the messaging layer to the new protocol. I think a separate thread to discuss this mapping

Re: [openstack-dev] [governance] Becoming a Program, before applying for incubation

2013-12-17 Thread Thierry Carrez
Mark McLoughlin wrote: On Tue, 2013-12-17 at 13:44 +0100, Thierry Carrez wrote: Mark McLoughlin wrote: How about if we had an emerging projects page where the TC feedback on each project would be listed? That would give visibility to our feedback, without making it a yes/no blessing. Ok,

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Re: [Blueprint vlan-aware-vms] VLAN aware VMs

2013-12-17 Thread Kyle Mestery
On Dec 16, 2013, at 11:17 PM, Isaku Yamahata isaku.yamah...@gmail.com wrote: Added openstack-dev On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 11:34:05PM +0100, Erik Moe emoe...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I have added a new document to the launchpad. Document should now be more in line with what we discussed at

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo]: implementing olso.messaging over amqp 1.0

2013-12-17 Thread Gordon Sim
On 12/17/2013 01:53 PM, Flavio Percoco wrote: On 16/12/13 10:37 +, Gordon Sim wrote: On 12/12/2013 02:14 PM, Flavio Percoco wrote: I've a draft in my head of how the amqp 1.0 driver could be implemented and how to map the current expectations of the messaging layer to the new protocol. I

Re: [openstack-dev] [governance] Becoming a Program, before applying for incubation

2013-12-17 Thread Flavio Percoco
On 17/12/13 11:54 +0100, Jaromir Coufal wrote: On 2013/16/12 15:19, Flavio Percoco wrote: 1. Programs that are not part of OpenStack's release cycle shouldn't be considered official nor they should have the rights that integrated projects have. I don't agree on this point. There might be

Re: [openstack-dev] [governance] Becoming a Program, before applying for incubation

2013-12-17 Thread Flavio Percoco
On 17/12/13 14:59 +0100, Thierry Carrez wrote: Mark McLoughlin wrote: On Tue, 2013-12-17 at 13:44 +0100, Thierry Carrez wrote: Mark McLoughlin wrote: How about if we had an emerging projects page where the TC feedback on each project would be listed? That would give visibility to our

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Re: [Blueprint vlan-aware-vms] VLAN aware VMs

2013-12-17 Thread Erik Moe
Hi, thanks for your comments. see answers below. Thanks, Erik On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 6:17 AM, Isaku Yamahata isaku.yamah...@gmail.comwrote: Added openstack-dev The document is view-only. So I commented below. - 2 Modeling proposal What's the purpose of trunk network? Can you

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo]: implementing olso.messaging over amqp 1.0

2013-12-17 Thread Flavio Percoco
On 17/12/13 14:22 +, Gordon Sim wrote: On 12/17/2013 01:53 PM, Flavio Percoco wrote: On 16/12/13 10:37 +, Gordon Sim wrote: On 12/12/2013 02:14 PM, Flavio Percoco wrote: I've a draft in my head of how the amqp 1.0 driver could be implemented and how to map the current expectations of

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] [Horizon] [Tuskar] [UI] Horizon and Tuskar-UI codebase merge

2013-12-17 Thread Jaromir Coufal
On 2013/17/12 11:04, Ladislav Smola wrote: Horizoners, As an alternative merge option, we could merge directly to Horizon code base. After some conversation, we have realized that it is possible to mix codebase of incubated and integrated projects, as Trove showed us. Contrary to what was said

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO][Tuskar] Terminology

2013-12-17 Thread Tzu-Mainn Chen
On 2013/13/12 23:11, Jordan OMara wrote: On 13/12/13 16:20 +1300, Robert Collins wrote: However, on instance - 'instance' is a very well defined term in Nova and thus OpenStack: Nova boot gets you an instance, nova delete gets rid of an instance, nova rebuild recreates it, etc. Instances

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] weekly meeting

2013-12-17 Thread Eric Harney
I also like the idea of alternating each week. Eric On 12/17/2013 01:40 AM, Mike Perez wrote: I agree with Qin here that alternating might be a good option. I'm not opposed to being present to both meetings though. -Mike Perez On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 9:31 PM, Qin Zhao

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][IPv6] Change I5b2313ff: Create a new attribute for subnets, to store v6 dhcp options

2013-12-17 Thread Xuhan Peng
I think slaac was original excluded to make --enable-ra not specified when only slaac is given to an subnet's dhcp mode. However, when I checked the example conf file of dnsmasq: http://www.thekelleys.org.uk/dnsmasq/docs/dnsmasq.conf.example enable-ra is explained as: # Do router

Re: [openstack-dev] Unified Guest Agent proposal

2013-12-17 Thread Dmitry Mescheryakov
Folks, The discussion didn't result in a consensus, but it did revealed a great number of things to be accounted. I've tried to summarize top-level points in the etherpad [1]. It lists only items everyone (as it seems to me) agrees on, or suggested options where there was no consensus. Let me

Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon] Enhance UX of Launch Instance Form

2013-12-17 Thread Gabriel pettier
I've been working on this blueprint's implementation, the first bullet point has been implemented by the two following Gerrit reviews: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/61754/3 and https://review.openstack.org/#/c/62442/ The first one is simply there to allow for any modal view to declare

[openstack-dev] [testr] debugging failing testr runs

2013-12-17 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah
Hello, I was wondering what was the strategy to debug a failed run with tox? I was trying to see which tests was failing with python-keystoneclient and py33 and this is the type of error i am getting : http://paste.openstack.org/show/gc3xMk34ELuSF5Fk1mvP/ (bet it with tox directly or from the

Re: [openstack-dev] Unified Guest Agent proposal

2013-12-17 Thread Thomas Herve
The discussion didn't result in a consensus, but it did revealed a great number of things to be accounted. I've tried to summarize top-level points in the etherpad [1]. It lists only items everyone (as it seems to me) agrees on, or suggested options where there was no consensus. Let me know

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] weekly meeting

2013-12-17 Thread Jay S Bryant
John, I am flexible. I am fine with trying to move the time to 04:00 or 05:00 UTC or we can alternate. The one concern with alternation is that it may lead to confusion and less attendance, but I am certainly open to trying it. Jay S. Bryant IBM Cinder Subject Matter Expert

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] weekly meeting

2013-12-17 Thread Walter A. Boring IV
4 or 5 UTC works better for me. I can't attend the current meeting time, due to taking my kids to school in the morning at 1620UTC Walt Hi All, Prompted by a recent suggestion from Tom Fifield, I thought I'd gauge some interest in either changing the weekly Cinder meeting time, or proposing

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] [Horizon] [Tuskar] [UI] Horizon and Tuskar-UI merge

2013-12-17 Thread Jay Pipes
On 12/17/2013 03:04 AM, Thomas Goirand wrote: On 12/16/2013 10:32 PM, Jaromir Coufal wrote: This is important note. From information architecture and user interaction point of view, I don't think it makes sense to keep all the three tabs visible together (Project, Admin, Infrastructure). There

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][VMware] Deploy from vCenter template

2013-12-17 Thread Arnaud Legendre
Hi Qui Xing, We are planning to address the vCenter template issue by levering the OVF/OVA capabilities. Kiran's implementation is tied to a specific VC and requires to add Glance properties that are not generic. For existing templates, the workflow will be: . generate an *.ova tarball

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][IPv6] Change I5b2313ff: Create a new attribute for subnets, to store v6 dhcp options

2013-12-17 Thread Shixiong Shang
Yes, the man page is a little bit confusing. The “slaac” mode requires “—enable-ra” since it needs to manipulate MOAL bits in the RA. As matter of fact, all of the modes available for IPv6 rely on “—enable-ra”. My understanding is, the ra-names option has nothing to do with RA. It resolves the

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Support for Pecan in Nova

2013-12-17 Thread Ryan Petrello
So any additional feedback on this patch? I’d love to start working on porting some of the other extensions to pecan, but want to make sure I’ve got approval on this approach first. https://review.openstack.org/#/c/61303/7 --- Ryan Petrello Senior Developer, DreamHost

[openstack-dev] Healthnmon

2013-12-17 Thread David S Taylor
Could anyone tell me about the status of the Healthnmon project [1]? There is a proposal [2] to integrate Ceilometer and Healthnmon, which is about 1 year old. I am interested in developing a monitoring solution, and discovered that there may already be a project and community in place around

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][IPv6] Change I5b2313ff: Create a new attribute for subnets, to store v6 dhcp options

2013-12-17 Thread Ian Wells
This is a discussion document for starters - https://docs.google.com/document/d/1rOBOOu_OwixMStm6XJOb5PKkJA6eFbL_XCE7wlTfaPY. It's lacking the names you asked for at the moment but have a comment on it (frequent commenters get edit rights) and from there we can generate and tidy up the

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra] Meeting Tuesday December 17th at 19:00 UTC

2013-12-17 Thread Elizabeth Krumbach Joseph
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 8:33 AM, Elizabeth Krumbach Joseph l...@princessleia.com wrote: The OpenStack Infrastructure (Infra) team is hosting our weekly meeting tomorrow, Tuesday December 17th, at 19:00 UTC in #openstack-meeting Meeting minutes and log here: Minutes:

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][IPv6] Change I5b2313ff: Create a new attribute for subnets, to store v6 dhcp options

2013-12-17 Thread Ian Wells
On 17 December 2013 18:57, Shixiong Shang sparkofwisdom.cl...@gmail.comwrote: Yes, the man page is a little bit confusing. The “slaac” mode requires “—enable-ra” since it needs to manipulate MOAL bits in the RA. As matter of fact, all of the modes available for IPv6 rely on “—enable-ra”. My

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][IPv6] Change I5b2313ff: Create a new attribute for subnets, to store v6 dhcp options

2013-12-17 Thread Collins, Sean
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 07:39:14PM +0100, Ian Wells wrote: 1. The patch ties Neutron's parameters specifically to dnsmasq. It would be, I think, impossible to reimplement this for isc-dhcpd, for instance. While I agree in theory with this point - there are currently no active blueprints to add

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] [Horizon] [Tuskar] [UI] Horizon and Tuskar-UI merge

2013-12-17 Thread Lyle, David
The simplest solution is already built into the Horizon framework. Any panel or dashboard can be disabled by a check to determine if a service is available in the service catalog. Since there is an inherent above/under cloud separation here, the Tuskar service should not be available above

Re: [openstack-dev] Unified Guest Agent proposal

2013-12-17 Thread Dmitry Mescheryakov
Hello Thomas, I do understand your feelings. The problem is there were already many points raised both pro and contra adopting Salt as an agent. And so far no consensus was reached on that matter. Maybe someone else is willing to step out and write a PoC for Salt-based agent? Then we can agree on

Re: [openstack-dev] Incubation Request for Barbican

2013-12-17 Thread Jarret Raim
On 12/13/13, 7:56 AM, Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com wrote: 1) Are each of the items you mention big enough to have a sustainable team that can exist as its own program? The answer here for Barbican and Keystone is yes. 2) Would there be a benefit of *changing* the scope and mission of the

Re: [openstack-dev] Incubation Request for Barbican

2013-12-17 Thread Jarret Raim
On 12/13/13, 4:50 AM, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.org wrote: If you remove Jenkins and attach Paul Kehrer, jqxin2006 (Michael Xin), Arash Ghoreyshi, Chad Lung and Steven Gonzales to Rackspace, then the picture is: 67% of commits come from a single person (John Wood) 96% of commits come

[openstack-dev] Glance WSGI File Read Bug (Grizzly)

2013-12-17 Thread Miller, Mark M (EB SW Cloud - RD - Corvallis)
I was able to pin down the image upload problem today: The Store.add file input read loop using chunkreadable throws an error on the very last read. Apparently the mod_wsgi.Input behaves differently than its eventlet counterpart in that it throws an error if the requested data length is

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [policy] Policy-group relationship

2013-12-17 Thread Mohammad Banikazemi
Stephen Wong s3w...@midokura.com wrote on 12/15/2013 12:00:32 PM: From: Stephen Wong s3w...@midokura.com To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org, Date: 12/15/2013 12:04 PM Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [policy]

Re: [openstack-dev] Incubation Request for Barbican

2013-12-17 Thread Mike Perez
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 11:44 AM, Jarret Raim jarret.r...@rackspace.comwrote: On 12/13/13, 4:50 AM, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.org wrote: If you remove Jenkins and attach Paul Kehrer, jqxin2006 (Michael Xin), Arash Ghoreyshi, Chad Lung and Steven Gonzales to Rackspace, then the

Re: [openstack-dev] [testr] debugging failing testr runs

2013-12-17 Thread Robert Collins
You ran a listing: ./.tox/py33/bin/python -m subunit.run discover -t ./ ./keystoneclient/tests --list which outputs the discovered tests as subunit enumerations. .tox/py33/bin/testr run will run the tests for you -Rob On 18 December 2013 05:18, Chmouel Boudjnah chmo...@enovance.com wrote:

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [policy] Policy-group relationship

2013-12-17 Thread Tim Hinrichs
Inline. - Original Message - | From: Mohammad Banikazemi m...@us.ibm.com | To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org | Cc: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org | Sent:

Re: [openstack-dev] Incubation Request for Barbican

2013-12-17 Thread Bhandaru, Malini K
To add to Jarret's arguments, across OpenStack we have seen as subsystems grow more mature and complex from additional feature extensions, they spawn off into separate projects. Case in point -- Neutron rose out of Nova Networking, and is marching on in richness and community support. Common

Re: [openstack-dev] [governance] Becoming a Program, before applying for incubation

2013-12-17 Thread Georgy Okrokvertskhov
Hi, Murano project volunteers to be a first project applying to Emerging projects program. Murano was here quite long time and it was developed taking into account all OpenStack development processes. I think Murano is a good candidate to be a first project in this new program as it should be

Re: [openstack-dev] Incubation Request for Barbican

2013-12-17 Thread Bhandaru, Malini K
Barbican, key manager is essential to openstack, paves the way to greater security. Instead of rejecting the project because of its current existence owed so heavily to Rackspace and to John Wood, why not we adopt it, code review, contribute code etc. We can have cores from multiple companies.

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][policy] Policy-Rules discussions based on Dec.12 network policy meeting

2013-12-17 Thread Tim Hinrichs
- Original Message - | From: Prasad Vellanki prasad.vella...@oneconvergence.com | To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org | Sent: Monday, December 16, 2013 2:11:37 PM | Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][policy] Policy-Rules

[openstack-dev] [Neutron] blueprint ovs-firewall-driver: Security groups extension API addition

2013-12-17 Thread Amir Sadoughi
Hi all, Monday at 2000 UTC I held an IRC meeting for blueprint ovs-firewall-driver to discuss implementation choices with the community. Only a handful of people attended so I wanted to open the discussion to the mailing list. (I’ve also uploaded this to the wiki

[openstack-dev] [Horizon] Weekly meeting time

2013-12-17 Thread Liz Blanchard
Hi All, In today's weekly meeting we discussed the possibility of changing the time of the weekly meetings to make it easier for everyone to attend. This seems to be a difficult task since we are worldwide! Nevertheless, let's see if Doodle can help us understand which times might be a better

[openstack-dev] [Heat] Neutron resources and hidden dependencies

2013-12-17 Thread Zane Bitter
At the design summit we had a discussion[1] about redesigning Neutron resources to avoid the need for hidden dependencies (that is to say, dependencies which cannot be inferred from the template). Since then we've got close to fixing one of those issues[2] (thanks Bartosz!), but the patch is

Re: [openstack-dev] Incubation Request for Barbican

2013-12-17 Thread Craig Tracey
++ As someone who has required patches to Barbican (and not affiliated with Rackspace) I can attest to the fact that my, albeit simple, changes have been reviewed and merged in a timely and constructive manner. Even if the project were to bring on a flood of new developers it wouldn't move this

[openstack-dev] [Neutron][IPv6] Three SLAAC and DHCPv6 related blueprints

2013-12-17 Thread Shixiong Shang
Hi, team: I created a new blueprint to reflect the work we accomplished in the previous POC to enable dnsmasq in SLAAC mode. In addition, I took the action item two weeks ago from weekly sub-team meeting to explore DHCPv6 options. The goal was to run dnsmasq as DHCPv6 server and provide both

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][policy] Policy-Rules discussions based on Dec.12 network policy meeting

2013-12-17 Thread Stephen Wong
Hi Subra, On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 9:32 PM, Subrahmanyam Ongole osm...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Stephan Comments inline for redirect action. Perhaps we may want to discuss each section in different email threads. On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 8:49 AM, Stephen Wong s3w...@midokura.com wrote: Hi,

[openstack-dev] Windows instances with password-less authentication

2013-12-17 Thread Alessandro Pilotti
Hi guys, We got password-less authentication properly working in Windows, implemented and included in Cloudbase-Init. Here’s a blog post explaining how it works: http://www.cloudbase.it/windows-without-passwords-in-openstack/ And the gory details:

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][IPv6] Three SLAAC and DHCPv6 related blueprints

2013-12-17 Thread Randy Tuttle
Great Shixiong. I can see that we have BPs from Sean / Da Zhao for providing the modes via the neutron client cli, but have we seen how those modes are provided through the dashboard? Randy Sent from my iPhone On Dec 17, 2013, at 9:07 PM, Shixiong Shang sparkofwisdom.cl...@gmail.com wrote:

Re: [openstack-dev] Unified Guest Agent proposal

2013-12-17 Thread Clint Byrum
Excerpts from Dmitry Mescheryakov's message of 2013-12-17 08:01:38 -0800: Folks, The discussion didn't result in a consensus, but it did revealed a great number of things to be accounted. I've tried to summarize top-level points in the etherpad [1]. It lists only items everyone (as it seems

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][policy] Policy-Rules discussions based on Dec.12 network policy meeting

2013-12-17 Thread Stephen Wong
Hi Prasad, Thanks for the comments, please see responses inline. On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 2:11 PM, Prasad Vellanki prasad.vella...@oneconvergence.com wrote: Hi Please see inline On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 8:49 AM, Stephen Wong s3w...@midokura.com wrote: Hi, During Thursday's

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Re: [Blueprint vlan-aware-vms] VLAN aware VMs

2013-12-17 Thread Yi Sun
On 12/17/13, 6:36 AM, Erik Moe wrote: Hi, thanks for your comments. see answers below. Thanks, Erik On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 6:17 AM, Isaku Yamahata isaku.yamah...@gmail.com mailto:isaku.yamah...@gmail.com wrote: Added openstack-dev The document is view-only. So I commented

Re: [openstack-dev] [governance] Becoming a Program, before applying for incubation

2013-12-17 Thread Dina Belova
Mark, I love that idea. It seems to me nice to have 'projects kindergarten' were every one is blessed because of youth and perspective from the point of OpenStack future, but at the same time it will be some scale of being talented and experienced for these 'children'. It might solve problem of

[openstack-dev] [Nova] [Ironic] Get power and temperature via IPMI

2013-12-17 Thread Gao, Fengqian
Hi, all, I am planning to extend bp https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/utilization-aware-scheduling with power and temperature. In other words, power and temperature can be collected and used for nova-scheduler just as CPU utilization. I have a question here. As you know, IPMI is used

[openstack-dev] VMware VCenter Driver

2013-12-17 Thread Ray Sun
Hi Stackers, I just looked into the VMware Vcenter Driver, seems it manages a vcenter cluster as a single compute node, even it contains more than 1 physical servers. It's not very connivence to know what's the real resource I had in my cluster. Is there any reason why we don't identify every

[openstack-dev] [nova][vmware]VMware VCenter Driver

2013-12-17 Thread Ray Sun
Sorry, I forget to modify the subject. Best Regards -- Ray On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 2:21 PM, Ray Sun xiaoq...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Stackers, I just looked into the VMware Vcenter Driver, seems it manages a vcenter cluster as a single compute node, even it contains more than 1 physical

[openstack-dev] [Solum] Git workflow meeting reminder agenda

2013-12-17 Thread Krishna Raman
Hi, The next Git-workflow meeting is tomorrow at 8 AM PST. (http://www.worldtimebuddy.com/?qm=1lid=8,524901,2158177,100h=8date=2013-12-18sln=8-9) Agenda: Administrative: * Skip meetings for next 2 weeks. Reconvene on Jan 8th. Topics: * Krishna and