Re: [openstack-dev] Horizon and Tuskar-UI codebase merge

2013-12-19 Thread Matthias Runge
On 12/18/2013 10:33 PM, Gabriel Hurley wrote: Adding developers to Horizon Core just for the purpose of reviewing an incubated umbrella project is not the right way to do things at all. If my proposal of two separate groups having the +2 power in Gerrit isn't technically feasible then a

Re: [openstack-dev] Diversity as a requirement for incubation

2013-12-19 Thread Sylvain Bauza
Le 18/12/2013 16:37, Steven Dake a écrit : In the early days of incubation requests, I got the distinct impression managers at companies believed that actually getting a project incubated in OpenStack was not possible, even though it was sparsely documented as an option. Maybe things are

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][lbaas] plugin driver

2013-12-19 Thread Eugene Nikanorov
Hi Subrahmanyam, The patch was originally implemented by Oleg Bondarev :) plugin-driver appears to be specific to driver provider That's correct How does this work with single common agent and many providers? The idea is that the plugin-driver is server-side logic which defines how

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][qa] test_network_basic_ops and the FloatingIPChecker control point

2013-12-19 Thread Yair Fried
Hi Guys, I run into this issue trying to incorporate this test into cross_tenant_connectivity scenario: launching 2 VMs in different tenants What I saw, is that in the gate it fails half the time (the original test passes without issues) and ONLY on the 2nd VM (the first FLIP propagates

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat] Nomination for heat-core

2013-12-19 Thread Thomas Herve
I would like to nominate Bartosz Górski to be a heat-core reviewer. His reviews to date have been valuable and his other contributions to the project have shown a sound understanding of how heat works. Here is his review history:

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][policy] Policy-Rules discussions based on Dec.12 network policy meeting

2013-12-19 Thread Prasad Vellanki
On Dec 17, 2013 3:22 PM, Tim Hinrichs thinri...@vmware.com wrote: - Original Message - | From: Prasad Vellanki prasad.vella...@oneconvergence.com | To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org | Sent: Monday, December 16, 2013

[openstack-dev] [Ironic] Yuriy Zveryanskyy for ironic-core?

2013-12-19 Thread Robert Collins
Yuriy seems to have been doing reviews consistently over the last three months, is catching plenty of issues. He isn't catching everything, but I think he catches approximately as much as other cores - none of us catch everything. -Rob -- Robert Collins rbtcoll...@hp.com Distinguished

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][policy] Policy-Rules discussions based on Dec.12 network policy meeting

2013-12-19 Thread Prasad Vellanki
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 7:34 PM, Stephen Wong s3w...@midokura.com wrote: Hi Prasad, Thanks for the comments, please see responses inline. On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 2:11 PM, Prasad Vellanki prasad.vella...@oneconvergence.com wrote: Hi Please see inline On Sun, Dec 15, 2013

[openstack-dev] [Neutron][IPv6] Blueprint Bind dnsmasq in qrouter- namespace

2013-12-19 Thread Xuhan Peng
I am reading through the blueprint created by Randy to bind dnsmasq into qrouter- namespace: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/dnsmasq-bind-into-qrouter-namespace I don't think I can follow the reason that we need to change the namespace which contains dnsmasq process and the device

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat] Nomination for heat-core

2013-12-19 Thread Steven Hardy
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 03:21:46PM +1300, Steve Baker wrote: I would like to nominate Bartosz Górski to be a heat-core reviewer. His reviews to date have been valuable and his other contributions to the project have shown a sound understanding of how heat works. Here is his review history:

[openstack-dev] meeting times and rotations etc...

2013-12-19 Thread Robert Collins
So, I'm a little worried about the complexities of organising free slots given we're basically about to double the # of entrieshave in all our calendars. Maybe we can do something a little simpler: just have the *whole calender* shift phase 180' each week: it won't be perfect, particularly for

Re: [openstack-dev] meeting times and rotations etc...

2013-12-19 Thread John Dickinson
Another option would be to use what we already have to our benefit. Instead of trying to provision two meeting rooms (-meeting and -meeting-alt), use the various other IRC channels that we already have for team meetings. This would allow for meetings to be at the same time, but it would free up

Re: [openstack-dev] [tuskar] How to install tuskar-ui from packaging point of view

2013-12-19 Thread Radomir Dopieralski
On 16/12/13 04:47, Thomas Goirand wrote: [snip] As for tuskar-ui, the install.rst is quite vague about how to install. I got the python-tuskar-ui binary package done, with egg-info and all, that's not the problem. What worries me is this part: [snip] Hello Thomas, sorry for the late reply.

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Tuskar CLI after architecture changes

2013-12-19 Thread Radomir Dopieralski
On 14/12/13 16:51, Jay Pipes wrote: [snip] Instead of focusing on locking issues -- which I agree are very important in the virtualized side of things where resources are thinner -- I believe that in the bare-metal world, a more useful focus would be to ensure that the Tuskar API service

[openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Weekly subteam meeting at Thursday, 19.12, 14-00 UTC

2013-12-19 Thread Eugene Nikanorov
Hi lbaas folks, Let's meet as usual at #openstack-meeting on Thursday, 19 at 14-00 UTC. The primary discussion points should be: 1) Third party testing, test scenarios 2) L7 rules 3) HA for agents and HA for HAProxy 4) SSL termination Thanks, Eugene

Re: [openstack-dev] meeting times and rotations etc...

2013-12-19 Thread Flavio Percoco
On 19/12/13 01:28 -0800, John Dickinson wrote: Another option would be to use what we already have to our benefit. Instead of trying to provision two meeting rooms (-meeting and -meeting-alt), use the various other IRC channels that we already have for team meetings. This would allow for

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][qa] test_network_basic_ops and the FloatingIPChecker control point

2013-12-19 Thread Sean Dague
On 12/18/2013 10:54 PM, Jay Pipes wrote: On 12/18/2013 10:21 PM, Brent Eagles wrote: Hi, Yair and I were discussing a change that I initiated and was incorporated into the test_network_basic_ops test. It was intended as a configuration control point for floating IP address assignments before

Re: [openstack-dev] meeting times and rotations etc...

2013-12-19 Thread Thierry Carrez
Robert Collins wrote: So, I'm a little worried about the complexities of organising free slots given we're basically about to double the # of entrieshave in all our calendars. I don't think that's what we are about to do, as I don't expect every single meeting to implement a rotation. As I

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][qa] test_network_basic_ops and the FloatingIPChecker control point

2013-12-19 Thread Sean Dague
On 12/19/2013 03:31 AM, Yair Fried wrote: Hi Guys, I run into this issue trying to incorporate this test into cross_tenant_connectivity scenario: launching 2 VMs in different tenants What I saw, is that in the gate it fails half the time (the original test passes without issues) and ONLY on

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic] Yuriy Zveryanskyy for ironic-core?

2013-12-19 Thread Maksym Lobur
I up-vote this election. Yuri doing much reviews, moreover he is mostly working on core ironic features, so he is more likely will spot architectural problems. Best regards, Max Lobur, Python Developer, Mirantis, Inc. Mobile: +38 (093) 665 14 28 Skype: max_lobur 38, Lenina ave. Kharkov, Ukraine

Re: [openstack-dev] meeting times and rotations etc...

2013-12-19 Thread Sean Dague
On 12/19/2013 04:28 AM, John Dickinson wrote: Another option would be to use what we already have to our benefit. Instead of trying to provision two meeting rooms (-meeting and -meeting-alt), use the various other IRC channels that we already have for team meetings. This would allow for

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] [neutron] PCI pass-through network support

2013-12-19 Thread John Garbutt
Apologies for being late onto this thread, and not making the meeting the other day. Also apologies this is almost totally a top post. On 17 December 2013 15:09, Ian Wells ijw.ubu...@cack.org.uk wrote: Firstly, I disagree that https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/PCI_passthrough_SRIOV_support is an

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Future meeting times

2013-12-19 Thread John Garbutt
+1 to 14:00 meeting, I can always make those. I can probably make some of the 21:00 meetings But probably only in the summer when its UTC+1 over here. John On 19 December 2013 07:49, Day, Phil philip@hp.com wrote: +1, I would make the 14:00 meeting. I often have good intention of making the

Re: [openstack-dev] Incubation Request for Barbican

2013-12-19 Thread Sean Dague
On 12/19/2013 12:10 AM, Mike Perez wrote: On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 1:59 PM, Mike Perez thin...@gmail.com mailto:thin...@gmail.com wrote: snip I reviewed the TC meeting notes, and my question still stands. It seems the committee is touching on the point of there being a worry because if

Re: [openstack-dev] Horizon and Tuskar-UI codebase merge

2013-12-19 Thread Jiri Tomasek
On 12/19/2013 08:58 AM, Matthias Runge wrote: On 12/18/2013 10:33 PM, Gabriel Hurley wrote: Adding developers to Horizon Core just for the purpose of reviewing an incubated umbrella project is not the right way to do things at all. If my proposal of two separate groups having the +2 power in

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] [neutron] PCI pass-through network support

2013-12-19 Thread Ian Wells
John: At a high level: Neutron: * user wants to connect to a particular neutron network * user wants a super-fast SRIOV connection Administration: * needs to map PCI device to what neutron network the connect to The big question is: * is this a specific SRIOV only (provider) network *

[openstack-dev] [savanna] team meeting Dec 19 1800 UTC

2013-12-19 Thread Sergey Lukjanov
Hi folks, We'll be having the Savanna team meeting as usual in #openstack-meeting-alt channel. Additionally, we are canceling our next two weekly meetings - Dec 26 and Jan 2. Agenda: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/SavannaAgenda#Agenda_for_December.2C_19

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO][Tuskar] Icehouse Requirements

2013-12-19 Thread Radomir Dopieralski
On 11/12/13 21:42, Robert Collins wrote: On 12 December 2013 01:17, Jaromir Coufal jcou...@redhat.com wrote: On 2013/10/12 23:09, Robert Collins wrote: [snip] Thats speculation. We don't know if they will or will not because we haven't given them a working system to test. Some part of that

[openstack-dev] [Climate] Next two weekly meetings cancelled ?

2013-12-19 Thread Sylvain Bauza
Hi team, I won't be able to attend the next two weekly meetings (23Dec and 30Dec), I would like to postpone our meetings till 6th January 2014. Any objections to this ? -Sylvain ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] [neutron] PCI pass-through network support

2013-12-19 Thread John Garbutt
On 19 December 2013 12:21, Ian Wells ijw.ubu...@cack.org.uk wrote: John: At a high level: Neutron: * user wants to connect to a particular neutron network * user wants a super-fast SRIOV connection Administration: * needs to map PCI device to what neutron network the connect to The

Re: [openstack-dev] [Climate] Next two weekly meetings cancelled ?

2013-12-19 Thread Sergey Lukjanov
Howdy, yup, agreed. Additionally, I'd like to start a discussion about new meeting time that'd be more US-folks friendly. Thanks. On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 4:49 PM, Sylvain Bauza sylvain.ba...@bull.netwrote: Hi team, I won't be able to attend the next two weekly meetings (23Dec and 30Dec),

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] [neutron] PCI pass-through network support

2013-12-19 Thread John Garbutt
On 19 December 2013 12:54, John Garbutt j...@johngarbutt.com wrote: On 19 December 2013 12:21, Ian Wells ijw.ubu...@cack.org.uk wrote: John: At a high level: Neutron: * user wants to connect to a particular neutron network * user wants a super-fast SRIOV connection Administration: *

Re: [openstack-dev] [Climate] Next two weekly meetings cancelled ?

2013-12-19 Thread Dina Belova
I have Christmas holidays till 12th January... So I don't really know I if I will be available 6th Jan. On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 4:49 PM, Sylvain Bauza sylvain.ba...@bull.netwrote: Hi team, I won't be able to attend the next two weekly meetings (23Dec and 30Dec), I would like to postpone our

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][IPv6] Blueprint Bind dnsmasq in qrouter- namespace

2013-12-19 Thread Randy Tuttle
First, dnsmasq is not being moved. Instead, it's a different instance for the attached subnet in the qrouter namespace. If it's not in the qrouter namespace, the default gateway (the local router interface) will be the interface of qdhcp namespace interface. That will cause blackhole for

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][IPv6] Blueprint Bind dnsmasq in qrouter- namespace

2013-12-19 Thread Shixiong Shang
Hi, Xuhan: Thanks for reaching out to us for questions! Here are the summary of several key points: 1. Currently dnsmasq is bound to the ns- interface within qdhcp- namespace. If we continue to use this model, then the announced RA has to use the ns- interface’s link-local address as source,

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] [neutron] PCI pass-through network support

2013-12-19 Thread Irena Berezovsky
Hi John, I totally agree that we should define the use cases both for administration and tenant that powers the VM. Since we are trying to support PCI pass-through network, let's focus on the related use cases. Please see my comments inline. Regards, Irena -Original Message- From: John

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat] Nomination for heat-core

2013-12-19 Thread Liang Chen
On 12/19/2013 10:21 AM, Steve Baker wrote: I would like to nominate Bartosz Górski to be a heat-core reviewer. His reviews to date have been valuable and his other contributions to the project have shown a sound understanding of how heat works. Here is his review history:

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] [Trove] [Savanna] [Oslo] Unified Agents - what is the actual problem?

2013-12-19 Thread Dmitry Mescheryakov
I agree that enabling communication between guest and cloud service is a common problem for most agent designs. The only exception is agent based on hypervisor provided transport. But as far as I understand many people are interested in network-based agent, so indeed we can start a thread (or

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Re: [Blueprint vlan-aware-vms] VLAN aware VMs

2013-12-19 Thread Ian Wells
On 19 December 2013 06:35, Isaku Yamahata isaku.yamah...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Ian. I can't see your proposal. Can you please make it public viewable? Crap, sorry - fixed. Even before I read the document I could list three use cases. Eric's covered some of them himself. I'm not

Re: [openstack-dev] [Climate] Next two weekly meetings cancelled ?

2013-12-19 Thread Sylvain Bauza
Le 19/12/2013 13:54, Sergey Lukjanov a écrit : yup, agreed. Additionally, I'd like to start a discussion about new meeting time that'd be more US-folks friendly. Luckily, we do have Internet now :

Re: [openstack-dev] [Climate] Next two weekly meetings cancelled ?

2013-12-19 Thread Sylvain Bauza
Le 19/12/2013 13:57, Dina Belova a écrit : I have Christmas holidays till 12th January... So I don't really know I if I will be available 6th Jan. Oh ok. Who else are still on vacation these times ? We can do our next meeting on 12th Jan, but I'm concerned with the delivery of Climate 0.1

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][qa] test_network_basic_ops and the FloatingIPChecker control point

2013-12-19 Thread Yair Fried
I would also like to point out that, since Brent used compute.build_timeout as the timeout value ***It takes more time to update FLIP in nova DB, than for a VM to build*** Yair - Original Message - From: Sean Dague s...@dague.net To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage

[openstack-dev] [climate] PTL elections: nominations

2013-12-19 Thread Sergey Lukjanov
Hey all, It was decided to choose the PTL for Climate project and I've volunteered to handle it. All important questions was discussed on the last IRC team meeting [1]. You can find details on a wiki page [2]. So, we'd like to choose PTL for the rest Icehouse release cycle. To announce your

[openstack-dev] [neutron] [ml2] Canceling next two weekly meetings

2013-12-19 Thread Kyle Mestery
Since the next two Neutron ML2 meetings fall on Dec. 25 and Jan. 1, we'll cancel both and reconvene on Jan. 8. Thanks! Kyle ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [third-party-testing] Reminder: Meeting tomorrow

2013-12-19 Thread Kyle Mestery
Apologies folks, I meant 2200 UTC Thursday. We'll still do the meeting today. On Dec 18, 2013, at 4:40 PM, Don Kehn dek...@gmail.com wrote: Wouldn't 2200 UTC be in about 20 mins? On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 3:32 PM, Itsuro ODA o...@valinux.co.jp wrote: Hi, It seems the meeting was not held

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] [neutron] PCI pass-through network support

2013-12-19 Thread John Garbutt
Response inline... On 19 December 2013 13:05, Irena Berezovsky ire...@mellanox.com wrote: Hi John, I totally agree that we should define the use cases both for administration and tenant that powers the VM. Since we are trying to support PCI pass-through network, let's focus on the related

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat] Nomination for heat-core

2013-12-19 Thread Randall Burt
+1 Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE Smartphone Original message From: Steve Baker sba...@redhat.com Date: 12/18/2013 8:28 PM (GMT-06:00) To: OpenStack Development Mailing List openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Subject: [openstack-dev] [heat] Nomination for heat-core I

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Docker] Environment variables

2013-12-19 Thread John Garbutt
On 17 December 2013 12:53, Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com wrote: On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 01:04:33PM -0800, Dan Smith wrote: eg use a 'env_' prefix for glance image attributes We've got a couple of cases now where we want to overrides these same things on a per-instance basis.

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] VM diagnostics - V3 proposal

2013-12-19 Thread John Garbutt
On 16 December 2013 15:50, Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com wrote: On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 03:37:39PM +, John Garbutt wrote: On 16 December 2013 15:25, Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com wrote: On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 06:58:24AM -0800, Gary Kotton wrote: I'd like to propose the

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] VM diagnostics - V3 proposal

2013-12-19 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 02:27:40PM +, John Garbutt wrote: On 16 December 2013 15:50, Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com wrote: On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 03:37:39PM +, John Garbutt wrote: On 16 December 2013 15:25, Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com wrote: On Mon, Dec 16, 2013

[openstack-dev] [Neutron][IPv6] Agenda for today's meeting

2013-12-19 Thread Collins, Sean
Hi, Agenda for today's meeting is pretty light - if you have something you'd like to discuss please add it to the wiki page https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Neutron-IPv6-Subteam#Agenda_for_Dec_19_2013 I would also ask that when we conduct the meeting - we stick to the agenda that has

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] VM diagnostics - V3 proposal

2013-12-19 Thread Vladik Romanovsky
I think it was: ceilometer sample-list -m cpu_util -q 'resource_id=vm_uuid' Vladik - Original Message - From: Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com To: John Garbutt j...@johngarbutt.com Cc: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] VM diagnostics - V3 proposal

2013-12-19 Thread Vladik Romanovsky
Or ceilometer meter-list -q resource_id='vm_uuid' - Original Message - From: Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com To: John Garbutt j...@johngarbutt.com Cc: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Sent: Thursday, 19 December,

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][qa] test_network_basic_ops and the FloatingIPChecker control point

2013-12-19 Thread Brent Eagles
Hi, Yair Fried wrote: I would also like to point out that, since Brent used compute.build_timeout as the timeout value ***It takes more time to update FLIP in nova DB, than for a VM to build*** Yair Agreed. I think that's an extremely important highlight of this discussion. Propagation of

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Do we have some guidelines for mock, stub, mox when writing unit test?

2013-12-19 Thread John Garbutt
On 4 December 2013 17:10, Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com wrote: I think option 3 makes the most sense here (pending anyone saying we should run away screaming from mox3 for some reason). It's actually what I had been assuming since this thread a while back. This means that we don't need

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][IPv6] Three SLAAC and DHCPv6 related blueprints

2013-12-19 Thread Collins, Sean
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 10:29:35PM -0500, Shixiong Shang wrote: It is up to Sean to make the call, but I would love to see IBM team in the meeting. Agreed - If we can find a time that works for USA, Europe and China that would be great. How good/bad is 1500 UTC? I don't trust my math :)

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][qa] test_network_basic_ops and the FloatingIPChecker control point

2013-12-19 Thread Frittoli, Andrea (Cloud Services)
My 2 cents: In the test the floating IP is created via neutron API and later checked via nova API. So the test is relying here (or trying to verify?) the network cache refresh mechanism in nova. This is something that we should test, but in a test dedicated to this. The primary objective of

Re: [openstack-dev] [trove] datastore migration issues

2013-12-19 Thread Greg Hill
We did consider doing that, but decided it wasn't really any different from the other options as it required the deployer to know to alter that data. That would require the fewest code changes, though. It was also my understanding that mysql variants were a possibility as well (percona and

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] VM diagnostics - V3 proposal

2013-12-19 Thread Matt Riedemann
On Thursday, December 19, 2013 8:49:13 AM, Vladik Romanovsky wrote: Or ceilometer meter-list -q resource_id='vm_uuid' - Original Message - From: Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com To: John Garbutt j...@johngarbutt.com Cc: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage

[openstack-dev] [Horizon] Support for Django 1.6

2013-12-19 Thread Thomas Goirand
Hi, Sid has Django 1.6. Is it planned to add support for it? I currently don't know what to do with the Horizon package, as it's currently broken... :( Thomas ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] VM diagnostics - V3 proposal

2013-12-19 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 04:28:30AM -0800, Gary Kotton wrote: Hi, Following the discussion yesterday I have updated the wiki - please see https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Nova_VM_Diagnostics. The proposal is backwards compatible and will hopefully provide us with the tools to be able to

Re: [openstack-dev] [trove] My thoughts on the Unified Guest Agent

2013-12-19 Thread Dmitry Mescheryakov
2013/12/19 Fox, Kevin M kevin@pnnl.gov How about a different approach then... OpenStack has thus far been very successful providing an API and plugins for dealing with things that cloud providers need to be able to switch out to suit their needs. There seems to be two different parts to

Re: [openstack-dev] [trove] datastore migration issues

2013-12-19 Thread Robert Myers
I think that we need to be good citizens and at least add dummy data. Because it is impossible to know who all is using this, the list you have is probably complete. But Trove has been available for quite some time and all these users will not be listening on this thread. Basically anytime you

Re: [openstack-dev] [Horizon] Support for Django 1.6

2013-12-19 Thread Jeremy Stanley
On 2013-12-19 23:45:09 +0800 (+0800), Thomas Goirand wrote: Sid has Django 1.6. Is it planned to add support for it? I currently don't know what to do with the Horizon package, as it's currently broken... :( You probably want to follow

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] VM diagnostics - V3 proposal

2013-12-19 Thread Gary Kotton
On 12/19/13 5:50 PM, Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com wrote: On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 04:28:30AM -0800, Gary Kotton wrote: Hi, Following the discussion yesterday I have updated the wiki - please see https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v1/url?u=https://wiki.openstack.org/wik

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] VM diagnostics - V3 proposal

2013-12-19 Thread Gary Kotton
On 12/19/13 6:07 PM, Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com wrote: On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 08:02:16AM -0800, Gary Kotton wrote: On 12/19/13 5:50 PM, Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com wrote: On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 04:28:30AM -0800, Gary Kotton wrote: Hi, Following the

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] [Trove] [Savanna] [Oslo] Unified Agents - what is the actual problem?

2013-12-19 Thread Tim Simpson
I agree that enabling communication between guest and cloud service is a common problem for most agent designs. The only exception is agent based on hypervisor provided transport. But as far as I understand many people are interested in network-based agent, so indeed we can start a thread

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] VM diagnostics - V3 proposal

2013-12-19 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 08:02:16AM -0800, Gary Kotton wrote: On 12/19/13 5:50 PM, Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com wrote: On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 04:28:30AM -0800, Gary Kotton wrote: Hi, Following the discussion yesterday I have updated the wiki - please see

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] VM diagnostics - V3 proposal

2013-12-19 Thread Vladik Romanovsky
Ah, I think I've responded too fast, sorry. meter-list provides a list of various measurements that are being done per resource. sample-list provides a list of samples per every meter: ceilometer sample-list --meter cpu_util -q resource_id=vm_uuid These samples can be aggregated over a period

Re: [openstack-dev] Incubation Request for Barbican

2013-12-19 Thread Clint Byrum
Excerpts from Sean Dague's message of 2013-12-19 04:14:51 -0800: On 12/19/2013 12:10 AM, Mike Perez wrote: On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 1:59 PM, Mike Perez thin...@gmail.com mailto:thin...@gmail.com wrote: snip I reviewed the TC meeting notes, and my question still stands. It seems the

[openstack-dev] [swift] Blocking issue with ring rebalancing

2013-12-19 Thread Nikolay Markov
Hi, Our team run into some serious trouble with performance of 'swift-ring-builder rebalance' after some recent changes. On our environment it takes about 8 minutes, and this and it is not the maximum. This is really blocker for us. This issue is reproducible on Ubuntu 12.04 + Python 2.7. The

Re: [openstack-dev] Horizon and Tuskar-UI codebase merge

2013-12-19 Thread Jaromir Coufal
So basically this is our first proposal what we send out: http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2013-December/022196.html After Horizon meetings, several e-mails and also couple of other discussions of people who are for/against codebase merge, it looks that in the end upstream

Re: [openstack-dev] Horizon and Tuskar-UI codebase merge

2013-12-19 Thread Lyle, David
So after a lot of consideration, my opinion is the two code bases should stay in separate repos under the Horizon Program, for a few reasons: -Adding a large chunk of code for an incubated project is likely going to cause the Horizon delivery some grief due to dependencies and packaging issues

Re: [openstack-dev] Horizon and Tuskar-UI codebase merge

2013-12-19 Thread Jordan O'Mara
- Original Message - So basically this is our first proposal what we send out: http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2013-December/022196.html After Horizon meetings, several e-mails and also couple of other discussions of people who are for/against codebase merge, it

[openstack-dev] [Climate] PTL Candidacy

2013-12-19 Thread Sylvain Bauza
Hi, I hereby would like to announce my candidacy for the Climate (Reservations) PTL. A brief history about me : I'm playing with Software Engineering and Operations since more than 10 years, with a special focus on Openstack since the Essex release. I promoted Openstack in my previous

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] [Trove] [Savanna] [Oslo] Unified Agents - what is the actual problem?

2013-12-19 Thread Dmitry Mescheryakov
Tim, IMHO network-based and hypervisor-based agents definitely can co-exist. What I wanted to say is that the problem of enabling communication between guest and cloud service is not relevant for hypervisor-based agents. They simply don't need network access into a VM. Dmitry 2013/12/19 Tim

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ceilometer] Nomination of Sandy Walsh to core team

2013-12-19 Thread Julien Danjou
On Mon, Dec 09 2013, Herndon, John Luke wrote: Hi John, I¹m not 100% sure what the process is around electing an individual to the core team (i.e., can a non-core person nominate someone?). However, I believe the ceilometer core team could use a member who is more active in the development

Re: [openstack-dev] Horizon and Tuskar-UI codebase merge

2013-12-19 Thread Tzu-Mainn Chen
+1 to this! - Original Message - So after a lot of consideration, my opinion is the two code bases should stay in separate repos under the Horizon Program, for a few reasons: -Adding a large chunk of code for an incubated project is likely going to cause the Horizon delivery some

Re: [openstack-dev] Horizon and Tuskar-UI codebase merge

2013-12-19 Thread Ana Krivokapic
On 12/19/2013 05:32 PM, Jordan O'Mara wrote: - Original Message - So basically this is our first proposal what we send out: http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2013-December/022196.html After Horizon meetings, several e-mails and also couple of other discussions of

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][IPv6] Three SLAAC and DHCPv6 related blueprints

2013-12-19 Thread Collins, Sean
Perfect! Will you be at the IRC meeting to discuss these? I've added them to the agenda in the hopes that we can discuss -- Sean M. Collins ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][IPv6] Three SLAAC and DHCPv6 related blueprints

2013-12-19 Thread Shixiong Shang
I will surely be there this afternoon, Sean! Look forward to it! On Dec 19, 2013, at 12:22 PM, Collins, Sean sean_colli...@cable.comcast.com wrote: Perfect! Will you be at the IRC meeting to discuss these? I've added them to the agenda in the hopes that we can discuss -- Sean M. Collins

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat] Nomination for heat-core

2013-12-19 Thread Jeff Peeler
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 03:21:46PM +1300, Steve Baker wrote: I would like to nominate Bartosz Górski to be a heat-core reviewer. His reviews to date have been valuable and his other contributions to the project have shown a sound understanding of how heat works. Here is his review history:

[openstack-dev] [State-Management] Agenda for today meeting at 2000 UTC

2013-12-19 Thread Joshua Harlow
Hi all, The [state-management] project team holds a weekly meeting in #openstack-meeting on thursdays, 2000 UTC. The next meeting is today, 2013-12-19!!! As usual, everyone is welcome :-) Link: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/StateManagement Taskflow:

Re: [openstack-dev] [Climate] PTL Candidacy

2013-12-19 Thread Sergey Lukjanov
Confirmed. https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Climate/PTL_Elections_Icehouse#Candidates On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 8:39 PM, Sylvain Bauza sylvain.ba...@bull.netwrote: Hi, I hereby would like to announce my candidacy for the Climate (Reservations) PTL. A brief history about me : I'm playing

Re: [openstack-dev] [trove] My thoughts on the Unified Guest Agent

2013-12-19 Thread Adrian Otto
When the OpenStack project was started in 2010, we conceived of two languages that would be considered to have first class status: Python, and C++. The idea is that Python would be used for the API services, and that C++ would be used in special cases where Python was not a good fit, such as

Re: [openstack-dev] Incubation Request for Barbican

2013-12-19 Thread Mike Perez
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 4:14 AM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote: On 12/19/2013 12:10 AM, Mike Perez wrote: On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 1:59 PM, Mike Perez thin...@gmail.com mailto:thin...@gmail.com wrote: snip I reviewed the TC meeting notes, and my question still stands. It seems the

Re: [openstack-dev] Adding DB migration items to the common review checklist

2013-12-19 Thread Ben Nemec
On 2013-12-18 22:08, Jay Pipes wrote: On 12/18/2013 02:14 PM, Brant Knudson wrote: Matt - Could a test be added that goes through the models and checks these things? Other projects could use this too. Here's an example of a test that checks if the tables are all InnoDB:

Re: [openstack-dev] Incubation Request for Barbican

2013-12-19 Thread Dolph Mathews
On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 4:48 PM, Morgan Fainberg m...@metacloud.com wrote: On December 12, 2013 at 14:32:36, Dolph Mathews (dolph.math...@gmail.com//dolph.math...@gmail.com) wrote: On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 2:58 PM, Adam Young ayo...@redhat.com wrote: On 12/04/2013 08:58 AM, Jarret Raim

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] [Ironic] Get power and temperature via IPMI

2013-12-19 Thread Devananda van der Veen
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 7:16 PM, Gao, Fengqian fengqian@intel.comwrote: Hi, Devananda, I agree with you that new features should be towards Ironic. As you asked why use Ironic instead of lm-sensors, actually I just want to use IPMI instead of lm-sensors. I think it is reasonable to put

[openstack-dev] [Nova] Default ephemeral filesystem

2013-12-19 Thread Robert Collins
The default ephemeral filesystem in Nova is ext3 (for Linux). However ext3 is IMNSHO a pretty poor choice given ext4's existence. I can totally accept that other fs's like xfs might be contentious - but is there any reason not to make ext4 the default? I'm not aware of any distro that doesn't

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Default ephemeral filesystem

2013-12-19 Thread Sean Dague
On 12/19/2013 03:21 PM, Robert Collins wrote: The default ephemeral filesystem in Nova is ext3 (for Linux). However ext3 is IMNSHO a pretty poor choice given ext4's existence. I can totally accept that other fs's like xfs might be contentious - but is there any reason not to make ext4 the

Re: [openstack-dev] [bugs] definition of triaged

2013-12-19 Thread Robert Collins
On 16 December 2013 23:56, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.org wrote: Robert Collins wrote: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/BugTriage is a 10 step process: thats not something we can sensible do over coffee in the morning. Totally agree with that. The idea of those 10 steps was not meant as

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][IPv6] Agenda for today's meeting

2013-12-19 Thread Collins, Sean
Minutes from the meeting: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/neutron_ipv6/2013/neutron_ipv6.2013-12-19-21.00.html -- Sean M. Collins ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org

[openstack-dev] [Neutron][IPv6] Meeting time - change to 1300 UTC or 1500 UTC?

2013-12-19 Thread Collins, Sean
Thoughts? I know we have people who are not able to attend at our current time. -- Sean M. Collins ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Tuskar CLI after architecture changes

2013-12-19 Thread Jay Pipes
On 12/19/2013 04:55 AM, Radomir Dopieralski wrote: On 14/12/13 16:51, Jay Pipes wrote: [snip] Instead of focusing on locking issues -- which I agree are very important in the virtualized side of things where resources are thinner -- I believe that in the bare-metal world, a more useful focus

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][IPv6] Meeting time - change to 1300 UTC or 1500 UTC?

2013-12-19 Thread Shixiong Shang
I cannot do 13:00UTC, but 14:00 or 15:00 UTC should work for me. On Dec 19, 2013, at 5:12 PM, Collins, Sean sean_colli...@cable.comcast.com wrote: Thoughts? I know we have people who are not able to attend at our current time. -- Sean M. Collins

[openstack-dev] [Ceilometer][Oslo] Consuming Notifications in Batches

2013-12-19 Thread Herndon, John Luke
Hi Folks, The Rackspace-HP team has been putting a lot of effort into performance testing event collection in the ceilometer storage drivers[0]. Based on some results of this testing, we would like to support batch consumption of notifications, as it will greatly improve insertion performance.

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][IPv6] Meeting time - change to 1300 UTC or 1500 UTC?

2013-12-19 Thread Randy Tuttle
Any of those times suit me. Sent from my iPhone On Dec 19, 2013, at 5:12 PM, Collins, Sean sean_colli...@cable.comcast.com wrote: Thoughts? I know we have people who are not able to attend at our current time. -- Sean M. Collins ___

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Neutron Tempest code sprint - 2nd week of January, Montreal, QC, Canada

2013-12-19 Thread Edgar Magana
Anita, Fawad and Myself will be also attending. BTW. Fawad will require an invitation letter for visa. He will email you directly with that request. Thanks, Edgar On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 1:17 PM, Anita Kuno ante...@anteaya.info wrote: Okay time for a recap. What: Neutron Tempest code

[openstack-dev] [keystone] External authentication plugins

2013-12-19 Thread Brant Knudson
We've got to figure out what external authentication plugins we're going to provide in Keystone. This is something that you'd think wouldn't be complicated, but somehow it's gotten that way. Since we've made mistakes in the past, let's try to be careful this time and come up with what plugins

  1   2   >