Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon] Javascript checkstyle improvement

2014-01-03 Thread Radomir Dopieralski
On 03/01/14 08:17, Matthias Runge wrote: On 12/27/2013 03:52 PM, Maxime Vidori wrote: I send this mail to talk about Javascript coding style improvement, like python has pep8, it could be interesting to have some rules for javascript too. JSHint provides some rules to perform this and I think

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] Common SSH

2014-01-03 Thread Flavio Percoco
On 02/01/14 11:17 -0500, Doug Hellmann wrote: On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 5:23 AM, Flavio Percoco fla...@redhat.com wrote: On 26/12/13 20:05 +0200, Sergey Skripnick wrote: Hi all, I'm surprised there is no common ssh library in oslo so I filed this blueprint[0]. I

Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon] Javascript checkstyle improvement

2014-01-03 Thread Matthias Runge
On 01/03/2014 09:37 AM, Radomir Dopieralski wrote: [snip] This is actually not a problem at all, because the way jshint works now, we have to explicitly list the files to be checked against those rules. That means, that we can only check our own code, and not the included libraries. Of

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][qa] Parallel testing update

2014-01-03 Thread Salvatore Orlando
I have already a patch under review for the quota test, for which I adopted the shortest-diff approach. As regards Robert's suggestion, the problem we have there is that the test uses a dedicated tenant, but it does not take into account the possibility that at some point the dhcp agent will

Re: [openstack-dev] MySQLdb situation with the gate

2014-01-03 Thread Flavio Percoco
On 02/01/14 17:41 -0600, Monty Taylor wrote: On 01/02/2014 12:48 PM, Monty Taylor wrote: Hey all! This morning, we experienced our first systemic breakage of the gate of 2014! There are a few reasons for this, which are related to pip and virtualenv making new releases. The new releases do

Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon] Javascript checkstyle improvement

2014-01-03 Thread Maxime Vidori
Someone said Grunt? - Original Message - From: Matthias Runge mru...@redhat.com To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Sent: Friday, January 3, 2014 9:52:48 AM Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon] Javascript checkstyle improvement On 01/03/2014 09:37 AM, Radomir Dopieralski wrote:

Re: [openstack-dev] Novnc switch to sockjs-client instead of websockify

2014-01-03 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 01/03/2014 01:03 AM, Ben Nemec wrote: On 2014-01-01 00:33, Thomas Goirand wrote: Hi, I was wondering if it would be possible for NoVNC to switch from websockify to sockjs-client, which is available here: https://github.com/sockjs/sockjs-client This has the advantage of not using flash

Re: [openstack-dev] django-bootstrap-form django 1.4 / 1.5

2014-01-03 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 01/02/2014 03:33 PM, Matthias Runge wrote: On 12/30/2013 08:31 AM, Thomas Goirand wrote: Hi, Currently, in the global-requirements.txt, we have: Django=1.4,1.6 django-bootstrap-form However, django-bootstrap-form fail in both Django 1.4 and Django 1.6. What's the way forward? Would

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ceilometer][Oslo] Consuming Notifications in Batches

2014-01-03 Thread Gordon Sim
On 01/02/2014 10:46 PM, Herndon, John Luke wrote: On 1/2/14, 11:36 AM, Gordon Sim g...@redhat.com wrote: On 12/20/2013 09:26 PM, Herndon, John Luke wrote: On Dec 20, 2013, at 12:13 PM, Gordon Sim g...@redhat.com wrote: On 12/20/2013 05:27 PM, Herndon, John Luke wrote: Other protocols

[openstack-dev] [oslo] [qa] oslo.config generator scrambling tempest config files

2014-01-03 Thread Sean Dague
So maybe I only just noticed it, but we moved to using the oslo.config generator in Tempest, and it's largely succeeding at creating really large config diffs and moving sections around all over the place. Exhibit A: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/60434/14/etc/tempest.conf.sample Which means

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Tuskar CLI after architecture changes

2014-01-03 Thread Jiří Stránský
On 21.12.2013 06:10, Jay Pipes wrote: On 12/20/2013 11:34 AM, Clint Byrum wrote: Excerpts from Radomir Dopieralski's message of 2013-12-20 01:13:20 -0800: On 20/12/13 00:17, Jay Pipes wrote: On 12/19/2013 04:55 AM, Radomir Dopieralski wrote: On 14/12/13 16:51, Jay Pipes wrote: [snip]

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] [qa] oslo.config generator scrambling tempest config files

2014-01-03 Thread Davanum Srinivas
Sean, Do you already have this in tempest copy of the code? https://review.openstack.org/#/c/60401/ - that will help going forward. -- dims On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 7:53 AM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote: So maybe I only just noticed it, but we moved to using the oslo.config generator in

[openstack-dev] [Glance] Passing error data in Glance exceptions?

2014-01-03 Thread David Koo
Hi All, At the moment the GlanceException class has only a static message member which holds the error string. As a result higher level modules (e.g. API) are unable to translate a lower level exception to a more meaningful user-facing message - they either have to construct a totally new

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] minimum review period for functional changes that break backwards compatibility

2014-01-03 Thread Thierry Carrez
Tim Bell wrote: Is there a mechanism to tag changes as being potentially more appropriate for the more ops related profiles ? I'm thinking more when someone proposes a change they suspect could have an operations impact, they could highlight this as being one for particular focus. How

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] [qa] oslo.config generator scrambling tempest config files

2014-01-03 Thread Sean Dague
On 01/03/2014 08:07 AM, Davanum Srinivas wrote: Sean, Do you already have this in tempest copy of the code? https://review.openstack.org/#/c/60401/ - that will help going forward. -- dims We did not, syncing now. It's sort of a bummer that the code isn't registration order. As we do

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] minimum review period for functional changes that break backwards compatibility

2014-01-03 Thread Anne Gentle
On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 7:52 AM, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.orgwrote: Tim Bell wrote: Is there a mechanism to tag changes as being potentially more appropriate for the more ops related profiles ? I'm thinking more when someone proposes a change they suspect could have an operations

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] minimum review period for functional changes that break backwards compatibility

2014-01-03 Thread Sean Dague
On 01/03/2014 09:44 AM, Anne Gentle wrote: On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 7:52 AM, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.org mailto:thie...@openstack.org wrote: Tim Bell wrote: Is there a mechanism to tag changes as being potentially more appropriate for the more ops related profiles ? I'm

Re: [openstack-dev] [Horizon] import only module message and #noqa

2014-01-03 Thread Russell Bryant
On 01/03/2014 10:10 AM, Radomir Dopieralski wrote: I think that we can actually do a little bit better and remove many of the #noqa tags without forfeiting automatic checking. I submitted a patch: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/64832/ This basically adds a h302_exceptions option to

[openstack-dev] [qa] Use test scenarios for interface type and auth version

2014-01-03 Thread Frittoli, Andrea (Cloud Services)
Hi, I'm working on multi-keystone-api-version-tests which aims to provide the ability to run tests using a configurable list of keystone API versions for authentication. If two versions of the API are configured, each test would be run using the two versions. In the gate, where we're

[openstack-dev] [requirements] - taskflow preventing sqla 0.8 upgrade

2014-01-03 Thread Sean Dague
Given that sqla 0.9 just came out, I wanted to explore, again, what the state of the world was with sqla 0.8 (especially given that Ubuntu and Red Hat are both shipping 0.8 in their OpenStack bundles) - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/64831/ The answer is not great. But more importantly, the

Re: [openstack-dev] [Horizon] import only module message and #noqa

2014-01-03 Thread Radomir Dopieralski
On 03/01/14 16:18, Russell Bryant wrote: On 01/03/2014 10:10 AM, Radomir Dopieralski wrote: I think that we can actually do a little bit better and remove many of the #noqa tags without forfeiting automatic checking. I submitted a patch: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/64832/ This basically

Re: [openstack-dev] [Horizon] import only module message and #noqa

2014-01-03 Thread Gabriel pettier
On Fri, Jan 03, 2014 at 10:18:58AM -0500, Russell Bryant wrote: On 01/03/2014 10:10 AM, Radomir Dopieralski wrote: I think that we can actually do a little bit better and remove many of the #noqa tags without forfeiting automatic checking. I submitted a patch:

Re: [openstack-dev] [Horizon] import only module message and #noqa

2014-01-03 Thread Russell Bryant
On 01/03/2014 10:35 AM, Radomir Dopieralski wrote: On 03/01/14 16:18, Russell Bryant wrote: On 01/03/2014 10:10 AM, Radomir Dopieralski wrote: I think that we can actually do a little bit better and remove many of the #noqa tags without forfeiting automatic checking. I submitted a patch:

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ceilometer] Vertica Storage Driver Testing

2014-01-03 Thread Herndon, John Luke
On 1/2/14, 7:06 PM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote: On 01/02/2014 08:36 PM, Robert Collins wrote: On 3 January 2014 14:34, Robert Collins robe...@robertcollins.net wrote: On 3 January 2014 12:40, Herndon, John Luke john.hern...@hp.com wrote: On 1/2/14, 4:27 PM, Clint Byrum

Re: [openstack-dev] neutron plugin for opendaylight

2014-01-03 Thread Kyle Mestery
On Jan 2, 2014, at 7:50 PM, Vijayendra BVS vijayendra...@gmail.com wrote: [Apologies if mesg is duplicated] Hi Kyle/Team, I’m looking at open daylight support in openstack and see the relevant blueprint for the neutron plugin for ODL at

Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon] Javascript checkstyle improvement

2014-01-03 Thread Monty Taylor
On 01/03/2014 03:10 AM, Maxime Vidori wrote: Someone said Grunt? Actually - funny story - we're currently working through some use of grunt and friends for storyboard, and as a result of that I've been learning about how it all hangs together. From what I can tell, I think the path to directly

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] minimum review period for functional changes that break backwards compatibility

2014-01-03 Thread David Kranz
On 01/03/2014 08:52 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: Tim Bell wrote: Is there a mechanism to tag changes as being potentially more appropriate for the more ops related profiles ? I'm thinking more when someone proposes a change they suspect could have an operations impact, they could highlight this

Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements] - taskflow preventing sqla 0.8 upgrade

2014-01-03 Thread Joshua Harlow
So taskflow was tested with the version of sqlalchemy that was available and in the requirements at the time of its 0.1 release (taskflow syncs it's requirements from the same global requirements). From what I remember this is the same requirement that everyone else is bound to:

Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements] - taskflow preventing sqla 0.8 upgrade

2014-01-03 Thread Sean Dague
On 01/03/2014 11:37 AM, Joshua Harlow wrote: So taskflow was tested with the version of sqlalchemy that was available and in the requirements at the time of its 0.1 release (taskflow syncs it's requirements from the same global requirements). From what I remember this is the same requirement

Re: [openstack-dev] [elastic-recheck] Thoughts on next steps

2014-01-03 Thread James E. Blair
Sean Dague s...@dague.net writes: So my feeling is we should move away from the point graphs we have, and present these as weekly and daily failure rates (with graphs and error bars). And slice those per job. My suggestion is that we do the actual visualization with matplotlib because it's

[openstack-dev] [infra] [devstack-gate] Nominating Sean Dague for devstack-gate-core

2014-01-03 Thread James E. Blair
Occasionally it becomes clear that a part of the project infrastructure has its own community interested in it. Such is the case with devstack-gate, which is the nexus of infra and openstack. Not only does it interact with infrastructure systems (in a surprisingly complex way) to prepare an

Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements] - taskflow preventing sqla 0.8 upgrade

2014-01-03 Thread Joshua Harlow
Ok, I think I'm fine with that (although not really sure what that entails). What does the living under the 'oslo program' change? Does that entail getting sucked into the incubator (which seems to be what your graduating link is about). I don't think its a good idea for taskflow to be in the

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Turbo-hipster

2014-01-03 Thread James E. Blair
Dan Prince dpri...@redhat.com writes: - Original Message - From: Michael Still mi...@stillhq.com - commenting recheck .* - commenting recheck migrations With the growing interest in 3rd party testing systems would using 'recheck turbo-hipster' make more sense here? I'm fine with

Re: [openstack-dev] neutron plugin for opendaylight

2014-01-03 Thread Vijayendra BVS
Hi Kyle, Thanks for the info, I'll try the setup and ping you/others on freenode in case I need any help. Regards, Vijay On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 8:22 AM, Kyle Mestery mest...@siliconloons.comwrote: On Jan 2, 2014, at 7:50 PM, Vijayendra BVS vijayendra...@gmail.com wrote: [Apologies if

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Dev] IDE extensions in .gitignore

2014-01-03 Thread Sam Harwell
OpenStack does not have operational or administrative ownership over the computers used by contributors. As such, the community should not accept or promote any policy which suggests a configuration that alters the behavior of systems beyond the scope of a local workspace used while working

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra] [devstack-gate] Nominating Sean Dague for devstack-gate-core

2014-01-03 Thread Clark Boylan
On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 9:46 AM, James E. Blair jebl...@openstack.org wrote: Occasionally it becomes clear that a part of the project infrastructure has its own community interested in it. Such is the case with devstack-gate, which is the nexus of infra and openstack. Not only does it

[openstack-dev] [infra] Unit tests, gating, and real databases

2014-01-03 Thread Ivan Melnikov
Hi there, As far as I understand, slaves that run gate-*-python27 and python26 jobs have MySQL and Postgres servers installed and running so we can test migrations and do functional testing for database-related code. I wanted to use this to improve TaskFlow gating, but I failed to find docs about

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra] [devstack-gate] Nominating Sean Dague for devstack-gate-core

2014-01-03 Thread Jeremy Stanley
On 2014-01-03 09:46:54 -0800 (-0800), James E. Blair wrote: [...] I propose that we create a devstack-gate-core group, and to it we add the core infrastructure team and Sean. I am enthusiastically, wholeheartedly in favor of this proposal. Sean's reviews and improvements for devstack-gate have

Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements] - taskflow preventing sqla 0.8 upgrade

2014-01-03 Thread Sean Dague
On 01/03/2014 12:45 PM, Joshua Harlow wrote: Ok, I think I'm fine with that (although not really sure what that entails). What does the living under the 'oslo program' change? Does that entail getting sucked into the incubator (which seems to be what your graduating link is about). I don't

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Dev] IDE extensions in .gitignore

2014-01-03 Thread Jeremy Stanley
On 2014-01-03 19:10:28 + (+), Sam Harwell wrote: OpenStack does not have operational or administrative ownership over the computers used by contributors. As such, the community should not accept or promote any policy which suggests a configuration that alters the behavior of systems

Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements] - taskflow preventing sqla 0.8 upgrade

2014-01-03 Thread Joshua Harlow
Sounds good to me. Talked on #openstack-infra with some folks there and just awaiting next steps. Doesn't seem like should be anything to hard to adjust/move/... -Josh On 1/3/14, 11:27 AM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote: On 01/03/2014 12:45 PM, Joshua Harlow wrote: Ok, I think I'm fine

Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements] - taskflow preventing sqla 0.8 upgrade

2014-01-03 Thread Doug Hellmann
On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 12:45 PM, Joshua Harlow harlo...@yahoo-inc.comwrote: Ok, I think I'm fine with that (although not really sure what that entails). What does the living under the 'oslo program' change? Does that entail getting sucked into the incubator (which seems to be what your

Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements] - taskflow preventing sqla 0.8 upgrade

2014-01-03 Thread Joshua Harlow
I'd be up for that 'dual' gating. It would help make sure that nothing major is breaking in the next version as well as the version released on pypi isn't also causing problems. Although git head gating does seem odd, especially as git head/trunk is where things change (and should be allowed

Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements] - taskflow preventing sqla 0.8 upgrade

2014-01-03 Thread Sean Dague
On 01/03/2014 02:44 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 12:45 PM, Joshua Harlow harlo...@yahoo-inc.com mailto:harlo...@yahoo-inc.com wrote: Ok, I think I'm fine with that (although not really sure what that entails). What does the living under the 'oslo program'

Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements] - taskflow preventing sqla 0.8 upgrade

2014-01-03 Thread Jeremy Stanley
On 2014-01-03 14:44:40 -0500 (-0500), Doug Hellmann wrote: [...] It seems safer to gate changes to libraries against the apps' trunk (to avoid making backwards-incompatible changes), and then gate changes to the apps against the released libraries (to ensure they work with something available

Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements] - taskflow preventing sqla 0.8 upgrade

2014-01-03 Thread Doug Hellmann
On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 3:13 PM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote: On 01/03/2014 02:44 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 12:45 PM, Joshua Harlow harlo...@yahoo-inc.com mailto:harlo...@yahoo-inc.com wrote: Ok, I think I'm fine with that (although not really sure what that

Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements] - taskflow preventing sqla 0.8 upgrade

2014-01-03 Thread Sean Dague
On 01/03/2014 03:30 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 3:13 PM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net mailto:s...@dague.net wrote: On 01/03/2014 02:44 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 12:45 PM, Joshua Harlow harlo...@yahoo-inc.com

Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements] - taskflow preventing sqla 0.8 upgrade

2014-01-03 Thread Doug Hellmann
On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 4:08 PM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote: On 01/03/2014 03:30 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 3:13 PM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net mailto:s...@dague.net wrote: On 01/03/2014 02:44 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 12:45

Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements] - taskflow preventing sqla 0.8 upgrade

2014-01-03 Thread Sean Dague
On 01/03/2014 04:17 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 4:08 PM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net mailto:s...@dague.net wrote: On 01/03/2014 03:30 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 3:13 PM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net mailto:s...@dague.net

Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements] - taskflow preventing sqla 0.8 upgrade

2014-01-03 Thread Ivan Melnikov
On 04.01.2014 01:29, Sean Dague wrote: On 01/03/2014 04:17 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: [...] That's what made me think of the solution. But isn't setuptools in fact telling us that somehow the versions of things we expected to have installed are no longer installed and so something *is* broken

Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements] - taskflow preventing sqla 0.8 upgrade

2014-01-03 Thread Sean Dague
On 01/03/2014 05:10 PM, Ivan Melnikov wrote: On 04.01.2014 01:29, Sean Dague wrote: On 01/03/2014 04:17 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: [...] That's what made me think of the solution. But isn't setuptools in fact telling us that somehow the versions of things we expected to have installed are no

Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements] - taskflow preventing sqla 0.8 upgrade

2014-01-03 Thread Joshua Harlow
Since the library model is what most everyone else uses outside of openstack (I assume?) what can we do to get there so that this model works as well? Expanding dependencies recursively seems like it could help? This could then detect transitive dependency issues (and doesn't seem so hard to do).

Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements] - taskflow preventing sqla 0.8 upgrade

2014-01-03 Thread Sean Dague
On 01/03/2014 06:14 PM, Joshua Harlow wrote: Since the library model is what most everyone else uses outside of openstack (I assume?) what can we do to get there so that this model works as well? Expanding dependencies recursively seems like it could help? This could then detect transitive

[openstack-dev] [trove] mid cycle meetup

2014-01-03 Thread Michael Basnight
Howdy, In the spirit of getting together to get stuff done, Trove is having a mid cycle meetup in Austin, TX. We are having it Wednesday, February 19, 2014 to Friday, February 21, 2014, in downtown Austin at the Capital Factory, which is a hip startup incubator. See [1] for more information. The

Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements] - taskflow preventing sqla 0.8 upgrade

2014-01-03 Thread Joshua Harlow
So another idea that was talked about on IRC. Taskflow exposes entrypoints for these storage backends (like your storage callback/interface idea). It currently provides 3 such 'default' backends [sqlalchemy, file/dir based, in-memory -- mainly for testing]. A 4th one is in progress for icehouse

Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements] - taskflow preventing sqla 0.8 upgrade

2014-01-03 Thread Robert Collins
On 4 January 2014 08:44, Doug Hellmann doug.hellm...@dreamhost.com wrote: I understand that moving taskflow into oslo would avoid the policy decision we have in place to not do symmetric gating on unreleased versions of things not owned by the OpenStack project. However, I don't know if we

Re: [openstack-dev] [qa] Use test scenarios for interface type and auth version

2014-01-03 Thread Robert Collins
On 4 January 2014 04:14, Frittoli, Andrea (Cloud Services) fritt...@hp.com wrote: Hi, I’m working on multi-keystone-api-version-tests which aims to provide the ability to run tests using a configurable list of keystone API versions for authentication. If two versions of the API are