[openstack-dev] [nova] where to expose network quota

2014-01-06 Thread Yaguang Tang
Hi all, Now Neutron has its own quota management API for network related items(floating ips, security groups .etc) which are also manged by Nova. when using nova with neutron as network service, the network related quota items are stored in two different databases and managed by different APIs.

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Tuskar CLI after architecture changes

2014-01-06 Thread Ladislav Smola
On 12/20/2013 05:51 PM, Clint Byrum wrote: Excerpts from Ladislav Smola's message of 2013-12-20 05:48:40 -0800: On 12/20/2013 02:37 PM, Imre Farkas wrote: On 12/20/2013 12:25 PM, Ladislav Smola wrote: 2. Heat stack create, update This is locked in the process of the operation, so nobody can

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Availability of external testing logs

2014-01-06 Thread Dave Cahill
Hi, Tail-F NCS Jenkins seems to still be causing issues. It voted -1 on some patches today [1][2] which seem to be fine according to all other jobs. It gives no information on what went wrong, so it's essentially a dead end. I've CCed the owner of the job according to the list Anita posted [3],

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ceilometer] Dynamic Meters in Ceilometer

2014-01-06 Thread Julien Danjou
On Tue, Dec 31 2013, Kodam, Vijayakumar (EXT-Tata Consultancy Ser - FI/Espoo) wrote: Hi, Currently there is no way to enable or disable meters without restarting ceilometer. There are cases where operators do not want to run all the meters continuously. In these cases, there should be a

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ceilometer] Dynamic Meters in Ceilometer

2014-01-06 Thread Kodam, Vijayakumar (EXT-Tata Consultancy Ser - FI/Espoo)
-Original Message- From: ext Julien Danjou [mailto:jul...@danjou.info] Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Ceilometer] Dynamic Meters in Ceilometer On Tue, Dec 31 2013, Kodam, Vijayakumar (EXT-Tata Consultancy Ser - FI/Espoo) wrote: Hi, Currently there is no way to enable or disable

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ceilometer] Dynamic Meters in Ceilometer

2014-01-06 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah
On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 12:52 PM, Kodam, Vijayakumar (EXT-Tata Consultancy Ser - FI/Espoo) vijayakumar.kodam@nsn.com wrote: In this case, simply changing the meter properties in a configuration file should be enough. There should be an inotify signal which shall notify ceilometer of the

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Availability of external testing logs

2014-01-06 Thread Collins, Sean
+1 to this, there are IPv6 patches that have been -1'd by this system that I believe prevents them from being reviewed, since most people skip over changes that have a -1 from Jenkins jobs. I also attempted to Reach out mid December to the owner of Tail-F, but have not yet received a

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Availability of external testing logs

2014-01-06 Thread Anita Kuno
Let me know what you consider a reasonable amount of time to continue waiting for Tail-F NCS Jenkins before we remove verification permissions from the account. We were just talking about this a few hours ago at a Birds of a Feather session. We can get permissions removed from this account. I'd

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Availability of external testing logs

2014-01-06 Thread Sean Dague
On 01/06/2014 08:44 AM, Anita Kuno wrote: Let me know what you consider a reasonable amount of time to continue waiting for Tail-F NCS Jenkins before we remove verification permissions from the account. We were just talking about this a few hours ago at a Birds of a Feather session. We can get

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Availability of external testing logs

2014-01-06 Thread Collins, Sean
I believe we have more to lose by leaving the job with verification permissions than we do by revoking them, then reinstating them at a later point, since I-2 is at the end of this month. That way patches that are passing the gate and all other third party tests can start being reviewed by

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] [neutron] Todays' meeting log: PCI pass-through network support

2014-01-06 Thread Robert Li (baoli)
Somehow I missed this email until today. See inline… thanks, Robert On 12/24/13 1:31 AM, Irena Berezovsky ire...@mellanox.commailto:ire...@mellanox.com wrote: Please, see inline From: Ian Wells [mailto:ijw.ubu...@cack.org.uk] Sent: Tuesday, December 24, 2013 1:38 AM To: OpenStack Development

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Availability of external testing logs

2014-01-06 Thread Luke Gorrie
Hi guys, On 6 January 2014 14:44, Anita Kuno ante...@anteaya.info wrote: If the account holder of this account is reading this email, responding to it would certainly be a good idea. Apologies for the disturbance! Please do go ahead and disable the voting rights while we work out what's going

[openstack-dev] Keystone Hashing MD5 to SHA256

2014-01-06 Thread Adam Young
Dirk, If it were as easy as just replaceing hteh hash algorithm, we would have done it a year + ago. I'm guessing you figured that by now. Here is the deal: We need to be able to make things work side by side. Not sure how to do that, but I think the right solution is to make keystone

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][qa] Parallel testing update

2014-01-06 Thread Isaku Yamahata
On Fri, Dec 27, 2013 at 11:09:02AM +0100, Salvatore Orlando sorla...@nicira.com wrote: Hi, We now have several patches under review which improve a lot how neutron handles parallel testing. In a nutshell, these patches try to ensure the ovs agent processes new, removed, and updated

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][IPv6] Meeting time - change to 1300 UTC or 1500 UTC?

2014-01-06 Thread Simon Leinen
Collins, Sean writes: Looking at the calendar, our options for 1500 UTC require us to change the day that we meet. The following days are available: * Tuesdays * Fridays Thoughts? For what it's worth (I haven't been contributing so far but I'm very interested in the topic and would

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][external networks] neutron net-external-list returns empty list after restart of neutron-server

2014-01-06 Thread rezroo
Eugene, Bug 1254555 seems to be the opposite of what I'm observing in Havana devstack. The bug states: I see that the ext-net network is not available after I do all of the above router/subnet creation. It does become available to tenants as soon as I restart neutron-server. But in the case

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][qa] Parallel testing update

2014-01-06 Thread Jay Pipes
On Mon, 2014-01-06 at 19:40 +0900, Isaku Yamahata wrote: On Fri, Dec 27, 2013 at 11:09:02AM +0100, Salvatore Orlando sorla...@nicira.com wrote: Hi, We now have several patches under review which improve a lot how neutron handles parallel testing. In a nutshell, these patches try to

Re: [openstack-dev] Keystone Hashing MD5 to SHA256

2014-01-06 Thread Jay Pipes
On Mon, 2014-01-06 at 17:00 +0100, Tristan Cacqueray wrote: On 01/06/2014 04:19 PM, Adam Young wrote: Dirk, If it were as easy as just replaceing hteh hash algorithm, we would have done it a year + ago. I'm guessing you figured that by now. Here is the deal: We need to be able to

Re: [openstack-dev] Keystone Hashing MD5 to SHA256

2014-01-06 Thread Tristan Cacqueray
On 01/06/2014 04:19 PM, Adam Young wrote: Dirk, If it were as easy as just replaceing hteh hash algorithm, we would have done it a year + ago. I'm guessing you figured that by now. Here is the deal: We need to be able to make things work side by side. Not sure how to do that, but I

[openstack-dev] [Nova] Requesting nova core to review 57614

2014-01-06 Thread Rohan Kanade
Hi, Can the nova-core please look at this review Nova: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/57614/ This review also needs tempest tests to be skipped Tempest: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/59187/ The nova patch needs a +2 so that the skipped tempest tests can be merged. Please review the nova

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][qa] Parallel testing update

2014-01-06 Thread Jay Pipes
On Mon, 2014-01-06 at 17:04 +0100, Salvatore Orlando wrote: I have already discussed the matter with Jay on IRC, even if for a different issue. In this specific case 'batching' will have the benefit of reducing the rootwrap overhead. Right. However, it seems the benefit from batching is not

Re: [openstack-dev] [qa] Have multiple config files

2014-01-06 Thread David Kranz
On 01/06/2014 05:14 AM, Shweta Jain wrote: Hello there , I am working on Tempest and is new to it . while I am using tempest.config but would like to know is there a way I can use multiple config files in tempest . My intention to use the multiple configs is purely for running the test in

[openstack-dev] [Nova] Requesting nova core to review 59860

2014-01-06 Thread Rohan Kanade
Hi, Can the nova-core please look at this review Nova: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/59860/ This review also needs tempest tests to be skipped Tempest: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/59946/ The nova patch needs a +2 so that the skipped tempest tests can be merged. Please review the nova

Re: [openstack-dev] [DevStack] Nominate Chmouel Boudjnah for core team

2014-01-06 Thread Sean Dague
On 01/06/2014 11:26 AM, Dean Troyer wrote: With the new year comes a long-overdue cleanup to the devstack-core membership and the desire to expand he team a bit. I propose to add Chmouel Boudjnah as he has been a steady contributor for some time, doing much of the Swift implementation. dt

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Requesting nova core to review 59860

2014-01-06 Thread Ben Nemec
Please don't send review requests to the list: http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2013-September/015264.html -Ben On 2014-01-06 10:24, Rohan Kanade wrote: Hi, Can the nova-core please look at this review Nova: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/59860/ [2] This

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][qa] Parallel testing update

2014-01-06 Thread Joe Gordon
On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 8:38 AM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, 2014-01-06 at 17:04 +0100, Salvatore Orlando wrote: I have already discussed the matter with Jay on IRC, even if for a different issue. In this specific case 'batching' will have the benefit of reducing the

[openstack-dev] [Neutron][IPv6] Meeting time - change to Tuesdays at 1500 UTC

2014-01-06 Thread Collins, Sean
I think we've got consensus. See everyone tomorrow at 1500 UTC in #openstack-meeting-alt -- Sean M. Collins ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][qa] Parallel testing update

2014-01-06 Thread Isaku Yamahata
On Mon, Jan 06, 2014 at 05:04:47PM +0100, Salvatore Orlando sorla...@nicira.com wrote: I have already discussed the matter with Jay on IRC, even if for a different issue. In this specific case 'batching' will have the benefit of reducing the rootwrap overhead. However, it seems the benefit

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Availability of external testing logs

2014-01-06 Thread Collins, Sean
How should we handle existing -1's that have been posted? -- Sean M. Collins ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][qa] Parallel testing update

2014-01-06 Thread Salvatore Orlando
I have already discussed the matter with Jay on IRC, even if for a different issue. In this specific case 'batching' will have the benefit of reducing the rootwrap overhead. However, it seems the benefit from batching is not resolutive. I admit I have not run tests in the gate with batching; I've

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat] Sofware Config progress

2014-01-06 Thread Susaant Kondapaneni
Hi Steve, I am trying to understand the software config implementation. Can you clarify the following: i. To use Software config and deploy in a template, instance resource MUST always be accompanied by user_data. User_data should specify how to bootstrap CM tool and signal it. Is that correct?

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][qa] Parallel testing update

2014-01-06 Thread Jay Pipes
On Mon, 2014-01-06 at 08:58 -0800, Joe Gordon wrote: On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 8:38 AM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, 2014-01-06 at 17:04 +0100, Salvatore Orlando wrote: I have already discussed the matter with Jay on IRC, even if for a different

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][qa] Parallel testing update

2014-01-06 Thread Joe Gordon
On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 9:37 AM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, 2014-01-06 at 08:58 -0800, Joe Gordon wrote: On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 8:38 AM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, 2014-01-06 at 17:04 +0100, Salvatore Orlando wrote: I have already

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] where to expose network quota

2014-01-06 Thread Vishvananda Ishaya
On Jan 6, 2014, at 12:47 AM, Yaguang Tang yaguang.t...@canonical.com wrote: Hi all, Now Neutron has its own quota management API for network related items(floating ips, security groups .etc) which are also manged by Nova. when using nova with neutron as network service, the network

Re: [openstack-dev] [DevStack] Nominate Chmouel Boudjnah for core team

2014-01-06 Thread Florent Flament
+1 - Original Message - From: Sean Dague s...@dague.net To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Sent: Monday, January 6, 2014 5:30:09 PM Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [DevStack] Nominate Chmouel Boudjnah for core team On

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat] Sofware Config progress

2014-01-06 Thread Clint Byrum
Excerpts from Susaant Kondapaneni's message of 2014-01-06 09:25:08 -0800: Hi Steve, I am trying to understand the software config implementation. Can you clarify the following: i. To use Software config and deploy in a template, instance resource MUST always be accompanied by user_data.

Re: [openstack-dev] Keystone Hashing MD5 to SHA256

2014-01-06 Thread Jeremy Stanley
On 2014-01-06 10:19:39 -0500 (-0500), Adam Young wrote: If it were as easy as just replaceing hteh hash algorithm, we would have done it a year + ago. I'm guessing you figured that by now. [...] With the lack of In-Reply-To header and not finding any previous messages to the list in the past

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Availability of external testing logs

2014-01-06 Thread Luke Gorrie
On 6 January 2014 18:12, Collins, Sean sean_colli...@cable.comcast.com wrote: How should we handle existing -1's that have been posted? I suggest removing/ignoring those votes until we see if they are spurious. The Tail-f NCS plugin is very simple code and I'd say it's unlikely that any recent

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][qa] Parallel testing update

2014-01-06 Thread Jay Pipes
On Mon, 2014-01-06 at 09:56 -0800, Joe Gordon wrote: What about it? Also those numbers are pretty old at this point. I was thinking disable rootwrap and run full parallel tempest against it. I think that is a little overkill for what we're trying to do here. We are specifically talking about

[openstack-dev] [Neutron][qa]API testing update

2014-01-06 Thread Miguel Lavalle
As described in a previous message, the community is focusing efforts in developing a comprehensive set of API tests in Tempest for Neutron. We are keeping track of this effort in the API tests gap analysis section at https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/icehouse-summit-qa-neutron These are recent

[openstack-dev] [qa] negative test generation and testscenarios

2014-01-06 Thread David Kranz
Thanks to all who looked at https://review.openstack.org/#/c/64733/. There were a few minor issues I will address but the biggest one was the suggestion to run each variation as a separate test case using testscenarios. After looking into that I see a problem with this use case. Many of these

[openstack-dev] [Gantt] Looking for some answers...

2014-01-06 Thread Jay Pipes
Hello Stackers, I was hoping to get some answers on a few questions I had regarding the Gantt project [1]. Specifically, here are my queries: 1) Why was Nova forked to the http://github.com/openstack/gantt repository? Forking Nova just to then remove a bunch of code that doesn't relate to the

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][external networks] neutron net-external-list returns empty list after restart of neutron-server

2014-01-06 Thread Eugene Nikanorov
The root cause is the same. Could you try the latest code from the trunk and see if problem has gone away? If it has not then it is really a different issue. Thanks, Eugene. On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 8:00 PM, rezroo r...@dslextreme.com wrote: Eugene, Bug 1254555 seems to be the opposite of

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][qa] Parallel testing update

2014-01-06 Thread Joe Gordon
On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 10:35 AM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, 2014-01-06 at 09:56 -0800, Joe Gordon wrote: What about it? Also those numbers are pretty old at this point. I was thinking disable rootwrap and run full parallel tempest against it. I think that is a little

[openstack-dev] Distributed Virtual Router Blueprint - Review ( North-South/East West with Services)

2014-01-06 Thread Vasudevan, Swaminathan (PNB Roseville)
Hi Folks, In the Icehouse summit design session we presented a DVR( Distributed Virtual Router) Proposal that was targeted only for East-West Communication and was based on a DVR datapath Kernel Driver. We discussed three different Use cases such as East-West, North-South and

Re: [openstack-dev] [Gantt] Looking for some answers...

2014-01-06 Thread Vishvananda Ishaya
On Jan 6, 2014, at 11:02 AM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote: Hello Stackers, I was hoping to get some answers on a few questions I had regarding the Gantt project [1]. Specifically, here are my queries: 1) Why was Nova forked to the http://github.com/openstack/gantt repository?

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][qa] Parallel testing update

2014-01-06 Thread Jay Pipes
On Mon, 2014-01-06 at 11:17 -0800, Joe Gordon wrote: On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 10:35 AM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, 2014-01-06 at 09:56 -0800, Joe Gordon wrote: What about it? Also those numbers are pretty old at this point. I was

[openstack-dev] [Neutron] Multiple config files for neutron server

2014-01-06 Thread Eugene Nikanorov
Hi folks, Recently we had a discussion with Sean Dague on the matter. Currently Neutron server has a number of configuration files used for different purposes: - neutron.conf - main configuration parameters, plugins, db and mq connections - plugin.ini - plugin-specific networking settings -

Re: [openstack-dev] [Tempest][Solum] Writing functional tests in tempest style

2014-01-06 Thread Georgy Okrokvertskhov
Hi Jay, Thank you for your input. Right now this approach allows to run integration tests with and without tempest. I think this is valuable for the project as anyone can run integration tests on their laptop having only keystone available. It will be great to have some input from Tempest team.

Re: [openstack-dev] [Gantt] Looking for some answers...

2014-01-06 Thread Dugger, Donald D
Pretty much what Vish said. In re: History. I think this was the right way, these scheduler files didn't just spring up from nowhere, maintaining the history is a good thing. Even when this becomes a separate service knowing where the files came from is a good thing. In re: Changes to the

Re: [openstack-dev] [Gantt] Looking for some answers...

2014-01-06 Thread Boris Pavlovic
Vish, and as I understand it the hope will be to do the no-db-scheduler blueprint. There was quite a bit of debate on whether to do the no-db-scheduler stuff before or after the forklift and I think the consensus was to do the forklift first. Current Nova scheduler is so deeply bind to nova data

[openstack-dev] [Solum][Pecan][Security] Pecan SecureController vs. Nova policy

2014-01-06 Thread Georgy Okrokvertskhov
Hi, In Solum project we will need to implement security and ACL for Solum API. Currently we use Pecan framework for API. Pecan has its own security model based on SecureController class. At the same time OpenStack widely uses policy mechanism which uses json files to control access to specific

Re: [openstack-dev] [Gantt] Looking for some answers...

2014-01-06 Thread Russell Bryant
On 01/06/2014 02:30 PM, Vishvananda Ishaya wrote: On Jan 6, 2014, at 11:02 AM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote: Hello Stackers, I was hoping to get some answers on a few questions I had regarding the Gantt project [1]. Specifically, here are my queries: 1) Why was Nova forked to

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Multiple config files for neutron server

2014-01-06 Thread Jay Pipes
On Mon, 2014-01-06 at 23:45 +0400, Eugene Nikanorov wrote: Hi folks, Recently we had a discussion with Sean Dague on the matter. Currently Neutron server has a number of configuration files used for different purposes: - neutron.conf - main configuration parameters, plugins, db and mq

Re: [openstack-dev] [Gantt] Looking for some answers...

2014-01-06 Thread Russell Bryant
On 01/06/2014 02:52 PM, Boris Pavlovic wrote: Vish, and as I understand it the hope will be to do the no-db-scheduler blueprint. There was quite a bit of debate on whether to do the no-db-scheduler stuff before or after the forklift and I think the consensus was to do the forklift first.

Re: [openstack-dev] [Gantt] Looking for some answers...

2014-01-06 Thread Boris Pavlovic
Russell, It should be pretty easy to do this in gantt though. Right now I would probably do it against the current scheduler and then we'll port it over. I don't think we should do major work only in gantt until we're ready to deprecate the current scheduler. That make sense. In couple of

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][qa] Parallel testing update

2014-01-06 Thread Salvatore Orlando
This thread is starting to get a bit confusing, at least for people with a single-pipeline brain like me! I am not entirely sure if I understand correctly Isaku's proposal concerning deferring the application of flow changes. I think it's worth discussing in a separate thread, and a supporting

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] minimum review period for functional changes that break backwards compatibility

2014-01-06 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 1/3/2014 10:30 AM, David Kranz wrote: On 01/03/2014 08:52 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: Tim Bell wrote: Is there a mechanism to tag changes as being potentially more appropriate for the more ops related profiles ? I'm thinking more when someone proposes a change they suspect could have an

Re: [openstack-dev] [Gantt] Looking for some answers...

2014-01-06 Thread Joshua Harlow
Was the history filtered out using something like http://git-scm.com/docs/git-filter-branch?? There seems to be a lot of commit history that isn't related to gantt files (baremetal…) Was the plan to figure out which files to keep, then cleanup that commit history? I wouldn't expect

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][qa] Parallel testing update

2014-01-06 Thread Jay Pipes
On Mon, 2014-01-06 at 21:24 +0100, Salvatore Orlando wrote: This thread is starting to get a bit confusing, at least for people with a single-pipeline brain like me! Heh, point taken. snip On the other hand, I would invite community members picking up some of the bugs we've registered for

[openstack-dev] [Gantt] New scheduler tree not up

2014-01-06 Thread Dugger, Donald D
This is to let everyone know that we have created a new source tree, `https://github.com/openstack/gantt.git', that contains the code for the Nova scheduler. The ultimate goal is to create a separate scheduler service that can be utilized by any part of OpenStack that needs a scheduling

Re: [openstack-dev] [Gantt] Looking for some answers...

2014-01-06 Thread Dugger, Donald D
The specific steps I used clone the nova tree and then use this script to delete areas of the tree: git filter-branch -f --index-filter git rm -r -f --cached --ignore-unmatch $* --prune-empty HEAD if [ -d .git/refs/original ] then git for-each-ref

Re: [openstack-dev] [Gantt] New scheduler tree not up

2014-01-06 Thread Russell Bryant
On 01/06/2014 03:55 PM, Dugger, Donald D wrote: This is to let everyone know that we have created a new source tree, `https://github.com/openstack/gantt.git’, that contains the code for the Nova scheduler. The ultimate goal is to create a separate scheduler service that can be utilized by any

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Availability of external testing logs

2014-01-06 Thread Anita Kuno
On 01/06/2014 10:32 PM, Luke Gorrie wrote: Hi guys, On 6 January 2014 14:44, Anita Kuno ante...@anteaya.info wrote: If the account holder of this account is reading this email, responding to it would certainly be a good idea. Apologies for the disturbance! Please do go ahead and

Re: [openstack-dev] [Gantt] Looking for some answers...

2014-01-06 Thread Jay Pipes
Thanks to Vish, Don, and Russell for the answers. Much appreciated! Best, -jay On Mon, 2014-01-06 at 11:30 -0800, Vishvananda Ishaya wrote: On Jan 6, 2014, at 11:02 AM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote: Hello Stackers, I was hoping to get some answers on a few questions I had

Re: [openstack-dev] [Gantt] Looking for some answers...

2014-01-06 Thread Vishvananda Ishaya
On Jan 6, 2014, at 11:52 AM, Boris Pavlovic bpavlo...@mirantis.com wrote: Vish, and as I understand it the hope will be to do the no-db-scheduler blueprint. There was quite a bit of debate on whether to do the no-db-scheduler stuff before or after the forklift and I think the consensus was

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Availability of external testing logs

2014-01-06 Thread Anita Kuno
On 01/07/2014 02:31 AM, Luke Gorrie wrote: On 6 January 2014 18:12, Collins, Sean sean_colli...@cable.comcast.com wrote: How should we handle existing -1's that have been posted? I suggest removing/ignoring those votes until we see if they are spurious. I is my belief that Sean is asking

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Multiple config files for neutron server

2014-01-06 Thread Sumit Naiksatam
Just thinking aloud - would it make sense to have a meta-configuration file; this file can hold the names of the configuration files to load. This would allow being a little more granular than picking up everything from a directory (if we had to go the route of using a directory name). ~Sumit.

Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements] - taskflow preventing sqla 0.8 upgrade

2014-01-06 Thread Doug Hellmann
On Sat, Jan 4, 2014 at 8:02 AM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote: On 01/03/2014 08:27 PM, Robert Collins wrote: On 4 January 2014 08:44, Doug Hellmann doug.hellm...@dreamhost.com wrote: It seems safer to gate changes to libraries against the apps' trunk (to avoid making

Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements] - taskflow preventing sqla 0.8 upgrade

2014-01-06 Thread Doug Hellmann
On Sun, Jan 5, 2014 at 5:02 PM, James E. Blair jebl...@openstack.orgwrote: Joshua Harlow harlo...@yahoo-inc.com writes: It seems simple to have variations of venvs (or something similar) that taskflow tox.ini can have that specify the different 0.7, 0.8, 0.9, when sqlalchemy 1.0 comes out

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Requesting nova core to review 57614

2014-01-06 Thread Robert Collins
Please ask such requests on IRC - it's part of the review policy that we don't please for reviews on the -dev list, and it's why cores should be on IRC if they are working :) -Rob On 7 January 2014 05:32, Rohan Kanade openst...@rohankanade.com wrote: Hi, Can the nova-core please look at this

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ceilometer][Tempest]Tracking of blueprints and changes

2014-01-06 Thread Doug Hellmann
On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 2:53 PM, David Kranz dkr...@redhat.com wrote: On 12/27/2013 05:27 AM, Nadya Privalova wrote: Hello guys! I hope all of you are enjoying the holidays! But I'd like to raise a Tempest question. Again. I hope this email will not be lost after vacations :)

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ceilometer] Dynamic Meters in Ceilometer

2014-01-06 Thread Doug Hellmann
On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 4:53 AM, Kodam, Vijayakumar (EXT-Tata Consultancy Ser - FI/Espoo) vijayakumar.kodam@nsn.com wrote: Hi, Currently there is no way to enable or disable meters without restarting ceilometer. There are cases where operators do not want to run all the meters

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][IPv6] Several topics for tomorrow's meeting

2014-01-06 Thread Shixiong Shang
Hi, Sean: Hope you had a great time with your family and friends during holiday! Tomorrow when we meet in IRC, can we put closure on one pending question on how to pass the “mode” to dnsmasq? If I understand everybody correctly: 1) The mode value should be dnsmasq agnostic 2) The approach

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] minimum review period for functional changes that break backwards compatibility

2014-01-06 Thread Joe Gordon
On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 7:08 AM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote: On 01/03/2014 09:44 AM, Anne Gentle wrote: On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 7:52 AM, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.org mailto:thie...@openstack.org wrote: Tim Bell wrote: Is there a mechanism to tag changes as being

Re: [openstack-dev] [Solum][Pecan][Security] Pecan SecureController vs. Nova policy

2014-01-06 Thread Georgy Okrokvertskhov
Hi Dough, Thank you for pointing to this code. As I see you use OpenStack policy framework but not Pecan security features. How do you implement fine grain access control like user allowed to read only, writers and admins. Can you block part of API methods for specific user like access to create

Re: [openstack-dev] [elastic-recheck] Thoughts on next steps

2014-01-06 Thread Joe Gordon
Overall this looks really good, and very spot on. On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 6:29 PM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote: A lot of elastic recheck this fall has been based on the ad hoc needs of the moment, in between diving down into the race bugs that were uncovered by it. This week away from it

Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements] - taskflow preventing sqla 0.8 upgrade

2014-01-06 Thread Jeremy Stanley
On 2014-01-06 17:23:31 -0500 (-0500), Doug Hellmann wrote: [...] The global requirements syncing seems to have fixed the issue for apps, although it just occurred to me that I'm not sure we check that the requirements lists are the same when we cut a release. Do we do that already? Not yet in

[openstack-dev] [neutron] [policy] Complementary or alternative semantics?

2014-01-06 Thread Tim Hinrichs
Over the holidays I realized there's something about the proposed Neutron policy API that I don't understand. Is the proposed API complementary to the core API, or is it intended to be an alternative? By complementary, I mean that a user can create a bunch of networks, subnets, and ports and

[openstack-dev] Status of nova-network deprecation

2014-01-06 Thread Tom Fifield
Hi all, It's a couple of weeks out from the slated decision milestone (icehouse-2) to potentially deprecate nova-network. Since I guess there's still time to affect this outcome, but I haven't seen much communication recently, here's a thread! I think a series of beautiful write-ups could

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat] Sofware Config progress

2014-01-06 Thread Steve Baker
On 07/01/14 06:25, Susaant Kondapaneni wrote: Hi Steve, I am trying to understand the software config implementation. Can you clarify the following: i. To use Software config and deploy in a template, instance resource MUST always be accompanied by user_data. User_data should specify how

Re: [openstack-dev] [trove] Proposal to add Auston McReynolds to trove-core

2014-01-06 Thread Michael Basnight
On Dec 27, 2013, at 2:48 PM, Michael Basnight mbasni...@gmail.com wrote: Howdy, Im proposing Auston McReynolds (amcrn) to trove-core. The people have spoken. Welcome to trove core, Auston. ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list

[openstack-dev] [nova] Change I005e752c: Whitelist external netaddr requirement, for bug 1266513, ineffective for me

2014-01-06 Thread Mike Spreitzer
I am suffering from bug 1266513, when trying to work on nova. For example, on MacOS 10.8.5, I clone nova and then (following the instructions at https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/DependsOnOSX) run `cd nova; python tools/install_venv.py`. It fails due to PyPI lacking a sufficiently advanced

Re: [openstack-dev] [elastic-recheck] Thoughts on next steps

2014-01-06 Thread Sean Dague
On 01/06/2014 07:04 PM, Joe Gordon wrote: Overall this looks really good, and very spot on. On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 6:29 PM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net mailto:s...@dague.net wrote: A lot of elastic recheck this fall has been based on the ad hoc needs of the moment, in between diving

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Change I005e752c: Whitelist external netaddr requirement, for bug 1266513, ineffective for me

2014-01-06 Thread Sean Dague
On 01/06/2014 09:33 PM, Mike Spreitzer wrote: I am suffering from bug 1266513, when trying to work on nova. For example, on MacOS 10.8.5, I clone nova and then (following the instructions at https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/DependsOnOSX) run `cd nova; python tools/install_venv.py`. It fails due

Re: [openstack-dev] [qa] negative test generation and testscenarios

2014-01-06 Thread Robert Collins
On 7 January 2014 07:41, David Kranz dkr...@redhat.com wrote: Thanks to all who looked at https://review.openstack.org/#/c/64733/. There were a few minor issues I will address but the biggest one was the suggestion to run each variation as a separate test case using testscenarios. After

Re: [openstack-dev] Proposal for instance-level snapshots in Nova

2014-01-06 Thread Christopher Yeoh
On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 7:50 AM, Jon Bernard jbern...@tuxion.com wrote: Hello all, I would like to propose instance-level snapshots as a feature for inclusion in Nova. An initial draft of the more official proposal is here [1], blueprint is here [2]. In a nutshell, this feature will take

[openstack-dev] [Gantt] Scheduler sub-group agenda 1/7

2014-01-06 Thread Dugger, Donald D
1) Memcached based scheduler updates 2) Scheduler code forklift 3) Instance groups -- Don Dugger Censeo Toto nos in Kansa esse decisse. - D. Gale Ph: 303/443-3786 ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [policy] Complementary or alternative semantics?

2014-01-06 Thread Mohammad Banikazemi
Hi Tim, It is complementary (as an extension to the core API). Mohammad From: Tim Hinrichs thinri...@vmware.com To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org, Date: 01/06/2014 07:35 PM Subject:[openstack-dev]

[openstack-dev] [QA] Meeting Thursday January 9th at 22:00 UTC

2014-01-06 Thread Matthew Treinish
Just a quick reminder that the weekly OpenStack QA team IRC meeting will be this Thursday, January 9th at 22:00 UTC in the #openstack-meeting channel. I'm sending this reminder out a bit earlier than usual this week because of the 2 week break over the holidays. The meeting agenda can be found

[openstack-dev] [nova] unittests are failing after change I5e4cb4a8

2014-01-06 Thread Vladik Romanovsky
Hello everyone, I'm just wondering, is there anyone else who is affected by this bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1266534 ? It looks to me that everyone should be affected by it (after change https://review.openstack.org/#/c/61310 has been merged), but I also see many tests in Jenkins

Re: [openstack-dev] Proposal for instance-level snapshots in Nova

2014-01-06 Thread John Griffith
On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 7:59 PM, Christopher Yeoh cbky...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 7:50 AM, Jon Bernard jbern...@tuxion.com wrote: Hello all, I would like to propose instance-level snapshots as a feature for inclusion in Nova. An initial draft of the more official proposal is

[openstack-dev] [Openstack][Nova][Docker] Devstack with docker driver

2014-01-06 Thread Swapnil Kulkarni
Hello, I am trying to setup devstack with docker driver and facing some issues related to docker-registry. Opened an issue with docker team [1] but to no response. Has anybody done devstack setup with docker driver? [1] https://github.com/dotcloud/docker/issues/3316 ~Swapnil

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack][Nova][Docker] Devstack with docker driver

2014-01-06 Thread Eric Windisch
On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 12:27 AM, Swapnil Kulkarni swapnilkulkarni2...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, I am trying to setup devstack with docker driver and facing some issues related to docker-registry. Opened an issue with docker team [1] but to no response. Has anybody done devstack setup with

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack][Nova][Docker] Devstack with docker driver

2014-01-06 Thread Eric Windisch
I am trying to setup devstack with docker driver and facing some issues related to docker-registry. Opened an issue with docker team [1] but to no response. Has anybody done devstack setup with docker driver? Also, I'm sorry you didn't get a speedy response through other means, but we

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack][Nova][Docker] Devstack with docker driver

2014-01-06 Thread Swapnil Kulkarni
Thanks Eric. I had already tried the solution presented on ask.openstack.org. I also found a bug [1] and applied code changes in [2], but to no success. I was just curious to know if anyone else is working on this or can provide some pointers from development front. [1]

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ceilometer] Dynamic Meters in Ceilometer

2014-01-06 Thread Tim Bell
Thinking using inotify/configuration file changes to implement dynamic meters, this would be limited to administrators of ceilometer itself (i.e. with write access to the file) rather than the project administrators (as defined by keystone roles). Thus, as a project administrator who is not

Re: [openstack-dev] [Gantt] Scheduler sub-group agenda 1/7

2014-01-06 Thread Alex Glikson
Maybe we can also briefly discuss the status of https://review.openstack.org/#/q/topic:bp/multiple-scheduler-drivers,n,z -- now that a revised implementation is available for review (broken into 4 small patches), and people are back from vacations, would be good to get some attention from