Excerpts from Jay Pipes's message of 2014-01-07 21:26:44 -0800:
On Wed, 2014-01-08 at 17:20 +1300, Robert Collins wrote:
On 8 January 2014 12:18, James Slagle james.sla...@gmail.com wrote:
Sure, the crux of the problem was likely that versions in the distro
were too old and they needed to
Hi,
I've started to work on the idea of supporting a kind of tenant/project based
configuration for Ceilometer. Unfortunately I haven't reached the point of
having a blueprint that could be registered until now. I do not have a deep
knowledge about the collector and compute agent services, but
Dear PTL,
I am working on a commit 'Deploy VMware vCenter templates' which was -2 in
Havana due to feature freeze. Could you please help to remove the -2 so as
we can move on?
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/34903/
Thanks!
Best Regards
---
Meng Qing
Hi,
In order for the VM to be booted the image needs to be on a datastore
accessible by the host. By default the data tore will not have the image. This
is copied from glance tot he datastore. This is most probably where the problem
is. This may take a while depending on the connectivity
Hi All,
Attach a volume when creating a server, the API contains
'block_device_mapping', such as:
block_device_mapping: [
{
volume_id: VOLUME_ID,
device_name: /dev/vdc,
delete_on_termination: true
}
]
It allows the option
I feel that we are getting quite far away from supporting my use case. Use
case: VM wants to connect to different 'normal' Neutron networks from one
VNIC. VLANs are proposed in blueprint since it's a common way to separate
'networks'. It is just a way to connect to different Neutron networks, it
Greetings,
I have a question related to cold migration.
Now in OpenStack nova, we support live migration, cold migration and resize.
For live migration, we do not need to confirm after live migration finished.
For resize, we need to confirm, as we want to give end user an opportunity
to
Hi Ivan,
Indeed, nodepool nodes have MySQL and PostgreSQL installed and
running. There are databases you can access from your tests
(mysql://openstack_citest:openstack_citest@localhost/openstack_citest
and postgresql://openstack_citest:openstack_citest@localhost/openstack_citest).
[1] is a great
On 08/01/14 05:07, Clint Byrum wrote:
Excerpts from Fox, Kevin M's message of 2014-01-07 16:27:35 -0800:
Another piece to the conversation I think is update philosophy. If
you are always going to require a new image and no customization after
build ever, ever, the messiness that source usually
Hi,
Your result is interesting and not surprising due to the different design
you have described.
The Ceilo team will work on the improvements IIUC.
I found two relevant links [1] [2]
@jay : the first case seems to be impossible, no scalable .. I bet for the
last :)
@June li
I am curious to
In nova/compute/api.py#2289, function resize, there's a parameter named
flavor_id, if it is None, it is considered as cold migration. Thus, nova
should skip resize verifying. However, it doesn't.
Like Jay said, we should skip this step during cold migration, does it make
sense?
On Wed, Jan 8,
Trinath,
Tempest tests should be backend-agnostic, so specific tests for your
mechanism driver is not needed.
You need specific testing environment for that which will run tempest tests
against a deployment with mechanism drivers you want to test. See also:
Hi all,
going back to the original topic of making the logs public, I have a
question:
how long should the logs be kept? One week? One month?
cheers,
Rossella
On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 1:22 PM, Torbjorn Tornkvist kruska...@gmail.comwrote:
My problem seem to be the same as reported here:
On 01/07/2014 09:01 PM, James Slagle wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to discuss some possible ways we could install the OpenStack
components from packages in tripleo-image-elements. As most folks are
probably aware, there is a fork of tripleo-image-elements called
tripleo-puppet-elements which does
On Wed, Jan 01, 2014 at 02:33:09PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
Hi,
I was wondering if it would be possible for NoVNC to switch from
websockify to sockjs-client, which is available here:
https://github.com/sockjs/sockjs-client
This has the advantage of not using flash at all (pure
On 01/06/2014 02:58 PM, Jay Pipes wrote:
On Mon, 2014-01-06 at 23:45 +0400, Eugene Nikanorov wrote:
Hi folks,
Recently we had a discussion with Sean Dague on the matter.
Currently Neutron server has a number of configuration files used for
different purposes:
- neutron.conf - main
Hi Dong,
Can you please clarify this blueprint? Currently in Neutron, If an instance has
a floating IP, then that will be used for both inbound and outbound traffic. If
an instance does not have a floating IP, it can make connections out using the
gateway IP (SNAT using PAT/NAT Overload).
On 01/07/2014 11:27 PM, Noorul Islam Kamal Malmiyoda wrote:
On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 9:43 AM, Georgy Okrokvertskhov
gokrokvertsk...@mirantis.com wrote:
Should we rather revert patch to make gate working?
I think it is always good to have test packages reside in
test-requirements.txt. So -1
Hi,
I am trying to run cinder unit tests via run_tests.sh since my tox has some
issues. Following is the error I am getting while running run_tests.sh
error in setup command: Error parsing /RMCUT/cinder/havana/setup.cfg:
OSError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory
Running ` python setup.py
Gary,
Thanks. Curretly, our upload speed is in the normal range?
Best Regards
-- Ray
On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 4:31 PM, Gary Kotton gkot...@vmware.com wrote:
Hi,
In order for the VM to be booted the image needs to be on a datastore
accessible by the host. By default the data tore will not have
On Jan 8, 2014 6:11 PM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote:
On 01/07/2014 11:27 PM, Noorul Islam Kamal Malmiyoda wrote:
On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 9:43 AM, Georgy Okrokvertskhov
gokrokvertsk...@mirantis.com wrote:
Should we rather revert patch to make gate working?
I think it is always good
On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 12:32 PM, Ben Nemec openst...@nemebean.com wrote:
On 2014-01-07 07:16, Doug Hellmann wrote:
On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 6:24 AM, Michael Kerrin michael.ker...@hp.comwrote:
I have been seeing this problem also.
My problem is actually with oslo.sphinx. I ran sudo pip
Hi neutrons,
Lets continue keeping our regular lbaas meetings. Let's gather on
#openstack-meeting at 14-00 UTC on this Thursday, 09.01.2014.
We'll discuss our progress and future plans.
Thanks,
Eugene.
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
I'd like to explore whether the paramiko team will accept this code (or
something like it). This seems like a perfect opportunity for us to
contribute
upstream.
+1
The patch is not big and the code seems simple and reasonable enough
to live within paramiko.
Cheers,
FF
I sent a pull
On Tuesday, January 07, 2014 4:53:01 PM, Michael Still wrote:
Hi. Thanks for reaching out about this.
It seems this patch has now passed turbo hipster, so I am going to
treat this as a more theoretical question than perhaps you intended. I
should note though that Joshua Hesketh and I have
On 01/08/2014 04:52 AM, Jay Lau wrote:
Greetings,
I have a question related to cold migration.
Now in OpenStack nova, we support live migration, cold migration and resize.
For live migration, we do not need to confirm after live migration finished.
For resize, we need to confirm, as
On 01/08/2014 09:26 AM, Noorul Islam Kamal Malmiyoda wrote:
On Jan 8, 2014 6:11 PM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net
mailto:s...@dague.net wrote:
On 01/07/2014 11:27 PM, Noorul Islam Kamal Malmiyoda wrote:
On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 9:43 AM, Georgy Okrokvertskhov
gokrokvertsk...@mirantis.com
On 8 January 2014 10:02, David Xie david.script...@gmail.com wrote:
In nova/compute/api.py#2289, function resize, there's a parameter named
flavor_id, if it is None, it is considered as cold migration. Thus, nova
should skip resize verifying. However, it doesn't.
Like Jay said, we should skip
From: Ray Sun xiaoq...@gmail.commailto:xiaoq...@gmail.com
Reply-To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.orgmailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Date: Wednesday, January 8, 2014 4:09 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for
On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 8:26 AM, Noorul Islam Kamal Malmiyoda
noo...@noorul.com wrote:
On Jan 8, 2014 6:11 PM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote:
On 01/07/2014 11:27 PM, Noorul Islam Kamal Malmiyoda wrote:
On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 9:43 AM, Georgy Okrokvertskhov
On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 11:13 PM, Swapnil Kulkarni
swapnilkulkarni2...@gmail.com wrote:
Let me know in case I can be of any help getting this resolved.
Please try running the failing 'docker run' command manually and without
the '-d' argument. I've been able to reproduce an error myself, but
On 01/08/2014 09:48 AM, Matt Riedemann wrote:
Another question. This patch [1] failed turbo-hipster after it was
approved but I don't know if that's a gating or just voting job, i.e.
should someone do 'reverify migrations' on that patch or just let it sit
and ignore turbo-hipster?
[1]
On Wednesday, 8 January, 2014 at 22:53, John Garbutt wrote:
On 8 January 2014 10:02, David Xie david.script...@gmail.com
(mailto:david.script...@gmail.com) wrote:
In nova/compute/api.py#2289, function resize, there's a parameter named
flavor_id, if it is None, it is considered as cold
On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 11:20 PM, Robert Collins
robe...@robertcollins.net wrote:
On 8 January 2014 12:18, James Slagle james.sla...@gmail.com wrote:
Sure, the crux of the problem was likely that versions in the distro
were too old and they needed to be updated. But unless we take on
building
I'd like to propose that we add another item to the list here [1] that
is basically related to what happens when the 3rd party CI job votes a
-1 on your patch. This would include:
1. Documentation on how to analyze the results and a good overview of
what the job does (like the docs we have
On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 3:16 AM, Ildikó Váncsa ildiko.van...@ericsson.comwrote:
Hi,
I've started to work on the idea of supporting a kind of tenant/project
based configuration for Ceilometer. Unfortunately I haven't reached the
point of having a blueprint that could be registered until now. I
Anne Gentle a...@openstack.org writes:
On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 8:26 AM, Noorul Islam Kamal Malmiyoda
noo...@noorul.com wrote:
On Jan 8, 2014 6:11 PM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote:
On 01/07/2014 11:27 PM, Noorul Islam Kamal Malmiyoda wrote:
On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 9:43 AM, Georgy
Thanks Russell, OK, will file a bug for first issue.
For second question, I want to show some of my comments here. I think that
we should disable cold migration for an ACTIVE VM as cold migrating will
first destroy the VM then re-create the VM when using KVM, I did not see a
use case why someone
On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 9:34 AM, Sergey Skripnick sskripn...@mirantis.comwrote:
I'd like to explore whether the paramiko team will accept this code (or
something like it). This seems like a perfect opportunity for us to
contribute
upstream.
+1
The patch is not big and the code seems
2014/1/8 John Garbutt j...@johngarbutt.com
On 8 January 2014 10:02, David Xie david.script...@gmail.com wrote:
In nova/compute/api.py#2289, function resize, there's a parameter named
flavor_id, if it is None, it is considered as cold migration. Thus, nova
should skip resize verifying.
在 2014年1月8日,20:24,Nir Yechiel nyech...@redhat.com 写道:
Hi Dong,
Can you please clarify this blueprint? Currently in Neutron, If an instance
has a floating IP, then that will be used for both inbound and outbound
traffic. If an instance does not have a floating IP, it can make connections
About spur: spur is looks ok, but it a bit complicated inside (it uses
separate threads for non-blocking stdin/stderr reading [1]) and I don't
know how it would work with eventlet.
That does sound like it might cause issues. What would we need to do to
test it?
Looking at the code, I
Hi,
-Original Message-
From: ext Neal, Phil [mailto:phil.n...@hp.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2014 12:50 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Ceilometer] Dynamic Meters in Ceilometer
For multi-node deployments,
From: ext Tim Bell [mailto:tim.b...@cern.ch]
Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2014 8:22 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Ceilometer] Dynamic Meters in Ceilometer
Thinking using inotify/configuration file changes to implement dynamic
There were so many places in this thread that I wanted to jump in on as
I caught up, it makes sense to just summarize things in once place
instead of a half dozen quoted replies.
I agree with the sentiments about flexibility. Regardless of my personal
preference on source v. packages, it's
On Wed, Jan 08 2014, Kodam, Vijayakumar (EXT-Tata Consultancy Ser - FI/Espoo)
wrote:
According to the latest update:
User calls the API(1) to disable a meter along with a meter id.
What's an user? An end-user or an operator?
I don't think we want to allow a user to disable a meter. I don't
Hi,
I do understand why there is a push back for this patch. This patch is for
infrastructure project which works for multiple projects. Infra maintainers
should not know specifics of each project in details. If this patch is a
temporary solution then who will be responsible to remove it?
If we
On Wed, Jan 08 2014, Ildikó Váncsa wrote:
(Your answers are very hard to read inline in my text MUA, it'd really
help if you could quote properly with the emails you answer to).
ildikov: Sorry, my explanation was not clear. I meant there the
configuration of data collection for projects, what
Excerpts from Derek Higgins's message of 2014-01-08 02:11:09 -0800:
On 08/01/14 05:07, Clint Byrum wrote:
Excerpts from Fox, Kevin M's message of 2014-01-07 16:27:35 -0800:
Another piece to the conversation I think is update philosophy. If
you are always going to require a new image and no
On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 11:16 AM, Ildikó Váncsa
ildiko.van...@ericsson.comwrote:
Hi Doug,
See my answers inline.
Best Regards,
Ildiko
*From:* Doug Hellmann [mailto:doug.hellm...@dreamhost.com]
*Sent:* Wednesday, January 08, 2014 4:10 PM
*To:* OpenStack Development Mailing List
On Jan 8, 2014 9:58 PM, Georgy Okrokvertskhov
gokrokvertsk...@mirantis.com wrote:
Hi,
I do understand why there is a push back for this patch. This patch is
for infrastructure project which works for multiple projects. Infra
maintainers should not know specifics of each project in details. If
Hi Kurt,
As for WSGI middleware I think about Pecan hooks which can be added before
actual controller call. Here is an example how we added a hook for keystone
information collection:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/64458/4/solum/api/auth.py
What do you think, will this approach with Pecan
On 01/08/2014 09:53 AM, John Garbutt wrote:
On 8 January 2014 10:02, David Xie david.script...@gmail.com wrote:
In nova/compute/api.py#2289, function resize, there's a parameter named
flavor_id, if it is None, it is considered as cold migration. Thus, nova
should skip resize verifying.
On 2014-01-08 08:24, Doug Hellmann wrote:
On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 12:32 PM, Ben Nemec openst...@nemebean.com wrote:
On 2014-01-07 07:16, Doug Hellmann wrote:
On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 6:24 AM, Michael Kerrin michael.ker...@hp.com wrote:
I have been seeing this problem also.
My
On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 10:43 AM, Eric Windisch ewindi...@docker.com wrote:
About spur: spur is looks ok, but it a bit complicated inside (it uses
separate threads for non-blocking stdin/stderr reading [1]) and I don't
know how it would work with eventlet.
That does sound like it might
On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 10:19 AM, Doug Hellmann
doug.hellm...@dreamhost.comwrote:
On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 9:34 AM, Sergey Skripnick
sskripn...@mirantis.comwrote:
I'd like to explore whether the paramiko team will accept this code (or
something like it). This seems like a perfect
On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 11:31 AM, Ben Nemec openst...@nemebean.com wrote:
On 2014-01-08 08:24, Doug Hellmann wrote:
On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 12:32 PM, Ben Nemec openst...@nemebean.com wrote:
On 2014-01-07 07:16, Doug Hellmann wrote:
On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 6:24 AM, Michael Kerrin
Excerpts from James Slagle's message of 2014-01-08 07:03:39 -0800:
On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 11:20 PM, Robert Collins
robe...@robertcollins.net wrote:
On 8 January 2014 12:18, James Slagle james.sla...@gmail.com wrote:
Sure, the crux of the problem was likely that versions in the distro
were
Excerpts from Jay Dobies's message of 2014-01-08 08:09:51 -0800:
There were so many places in this thread that I wanted to jump in on as
I caught up, it makes sense to just summarize things in once place
instead of a half dozen quoted replies.
I agree with the sentiments about flexibility.
On 2014-01-08 10:50, Doug Hellmann wrote:
On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 11:31 AM, Ben Nemec openst...@nemebean.com wrote:
On 2014-01-08 08:24, Doug Hellmann wrote:
On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 12:32 PM, Ben Nemec openst...@nemebean.com wrote:
On 2014-01-07 07:16, Doug Hellmann wrote:
On
On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 11:53 AM, Ben Nemec openst...@nemebean.com wrote:
On 2014-01-08 10:50, Doug Hellmann wrote:
On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 11:31 AM, Ben Nemec openst...@nemebean.com wrote:
On 2014-01-08 08:24, Doug Hellmann wrote:
On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 12:32 PM, Ben Nemec
Yeah, that could work. The main thing is to try and keep policy control in one
place if you can rather than sprinkling it all over the place.
From: Georgy Okrokvertskhov
gokrokvertsk...@mirantis.commailto:gokrokvertsk...@mirantis.com
Reply-To: OpenStack Dev
On 01/07/2014 06:30 PM, Ray Sun wrote:
Stackers,
I tried to create a new VM using the driver VMwareVCDriver, but I found
it's very slow when I try to create a new VM, for example, 7GB Windows
Image spent 3 hours.
Then I tried to use curl to upload a iso to vcenter directly.
curl -H Expect: -v
Excerpts from Jan Provaznik's message of 2014-01-08 03:00:19 -0800:
On 01/07/2014 09:01 PM, James Slagle wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to discuss some possible ways we could install the OpenStack
components from packages in tripleo-image-elements. As most folks are
probably aware, there is a
On 01/08/2014 12:06 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
snip
Yeah, that's what made me start thinking oslo.sphinx should be called
something else.
Sean, how strongly do you feel about not installing oslo.sphinx in
devstack? I see your point, I'm just looking for alternatives to the
hassle of renaming
Let me give you a more concrete example, since you still think one size fits
all here.
I am using OpenStack on my home server now. In the past, I had one machine with
lots of services on it. At times, I would update one service and during the
update process, a different service would break.
On Jan 6, 2014, at 3:50 PM, Jon Bernard jbern...@tuxion.com wrote:
Hello all,
I would like to propose instance-level snapshots as a feature for
inclusion in Nova. An initial draft of the more official proposal is
here [1], blueprint is here [2].
In a nutshell, this feature will take
On 01/08/2014 11:40 AM, Noorul Islam Kamal Malmiyoda wrote:
On Jan 8, 2014 9:58 PM, Georgy Okrokvertskhov
gokrokvertsk...@mirantis.com mailto:gokrokvertsk...@mirantis.com wrote:
Hi,
I do understand why there is a push back for this patch. This patch is
for infrastructure project which
The logic makes sense to me here. I’m including Evan Callicoat in this response
in case he has any comments on the points you make below.
Vish
On Jan 7, 2014, at 4:57 AM, Ian Wells ijw.ubu...@cack.org.uk wrote:
See Sean Collins' review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/56381 which
disables
Hi Doug,
Answers inline again.
Best Regards,
Ildiko
On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 3:16 AM, Ildikó Váncsa
ildiko.van...@ericsson.commailto:ildiko.van...@ericsson.com wrote:
Hi,
I've started to work on the idea of supporting a kind of tenant/project based
configuration for Ceilometer. Unfortunately I
On 2014-01-08 11:16, Sean Dague wrote:
On 01/08/2014 12:06 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
snip
Yeah, that's what made me start thinking oslo.sphinx should be called
something else.
Sean, how strongly do you feel about not installing oslo.sphinx in
devstack? I see your point, I'm just looking for
Hi,
(You didn't Cc the list, not sure if it was on purpose. I'm not adding it back
to not break any confidentiality, but feel free to do so.)
Sorry that was just a mistake.
The point is to configure the data collection configuration for the
currently existing meters differently for
On Wed, Jan 08 2014, Ildikó Váncsa wrote:
My idea was just about providing the possibility to configure the data
collection in Ceilometer differently for the different tenants, I didn't
mean to link it to an API or at least not on the first place. It could be
done by the operator as well, for
On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 11:02 PM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote:
On 01/08/2014 11:40 AM, Noorul Islam Kamal Malmiyoda wrote:
On Jan 8, 2014 9:58 PM, Georgy Okrokvertskhov
gokrokvertsk...@mirantis.com mailto:gokrokvertsk...@mirantis.com wrote:
Hi,
I do understand why there is a push back
On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 3:50 PM, Jon Bernard jbern...@tuxion.com wrote:
Hello all,
I would like to propose instance-level snapshots as a feature for
inclusion in Nova. An initial draft of the more official proposal is
here [1], blueprint is here [2].
In a nutshell, this feature will take
Hi,
My idea was just about providing the possibility to configure the data
collection in Ceilometer differently for the different tenants, I
didn't mean to link it to an API or at least not on the first place.
It could be done by the operator as well, for instance, if the polling
On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 12:37 PM, Ben Nemec openst...@nemebean.com wrote:
On 2014-01-08 11:16, Sean Dague wrote:
On 01/08/2014 12:06 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
snip
Yeah, that's what made me start thinking oslo.sphinx should be called
something else.
Sean, how strongly do you feel about not
On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 12:35 PM, Ildikó Váncsa
ildiko.van...@ericsson.comwrote:
Hi Doug,
Answers inline again.
Best Regards,
Ildiko
On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 3:16 AM, Ildikó Váncsa ildiko.van...@ericsson.com
wrote:
Hi,
I've started to work on the idea of supporting a kind of
On 1/7/14 2:53 PM, Michael Still wrote:
Hi. Thanks for reaching out about this.
It seems this patch has now passed turbo hipster, so I am going to
treat this as a more theoretical question than perhaps you intended. I
should note though that Joshua Hesketh and I have been trying to read
/
On Jan 8, 2014 7:12 AM, Matt Riedemann mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
I'd like to propose that we add another item to the list here [1] that is
basically related to what happens when the 3rd party CI job votes a -1 on
your patch. This would include:
1. Documentation on how to analyze the
Thanks for the clarifications. Given the role descriptions as provided, I no
longer think there is a need for an API call or per project meter
enable/disable. Thus, the inotify approach would seem to be viable (and much
simpler to implement since the state is clearly defined across daemon
On Wed, 2014-01-08 at 14:26 +0100, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Tim Bell wrote:
+1 from me too UpgradeImpact is a much better term.
So this one is already documented[1], but I don't know if it actually
triggers anything yet.
Should we configure it to post to openstack-operators, the same
On Wed, 2014-01-08 at 07:21 -0500, Sean Dague wrote:
On 01/06/2014 02:58 PM, Jay Pipes wrote:
On Mon, 2014-01-06 at 23:45 +0400, Eugene Nikanorov wrote:
Hi folks,
Recently we had a discussion with Sean Dague on the matter.
Currently Neutron server has a number of configuration files
On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 10:43 AM, Eric Windisch ewindi...@docker.com
wrote:
About spur: spur is looks ok, but it a bit complicated inside (it uses
separate threads for non-blocking stdin/stderr reading [1]) and I
don't
know how it would work with eventlet.
That does sound
Hi,
Keep policy control in one place is a good idea. We can use standard policy
approach and keep access control configuration in json file as it done in
Nova and other projects.
Keystone uses wrapper function for methods. Here is a wrapper code:
Note that, per the most recent updates in the bug, netaddr has
started uploading their releases to PyPI again so we should
hopefully be able to revert any workarounds we added for it. This
unfortunately does not hold true for other requirements of some
projects (netifaces in swift, lazr.restful in
From: ext Doug Hellmann [doug.hellm...@dreamhost.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2014 8:26 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Ceilometer] Dynamic
On 2014-01-07 07:17:58 -0500 (-0500), Sean Dague wrote:
This looks like it's a 100% failure bug at this point. I expect that
because of timing it's based on a change in the base image due to
nodepool rebuilding.
Actually not... Nova's Python 2.7 unit tests don't run on
nodepool-managed
On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 2:08 PM, Tim Bell tim.b...@cern.ch wrote:
Thanks for the clarifications. Given the role descriptions as provided, I
no longer think there is a need for an API call or per project meter
enable/disable. Thus, the inotify approach would seem to be viable (and
much
On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 3:09 PM, Kodam, Vijayakumar (EXT-Tata Consultancy
Ser - FI/Espoo) vijayakumar.kodam@nsn.com wrote:
From: ext Doug Hellmann [doug.hellm...@dreamhost.com]
Sent: Wednesday,
Does anybody know if this blueprint is being actively work on?
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/heat/+spec/windows-instances If this is not
active, can I take ownership of this blueprint? My team wants to add support
for Windows in Heat for our internal deployment.
Hi Doug,
OK, so like I said, we did not design the system with the idea that a user of
the cloud (rather than the deployer of the cloud) would have any control over
what data was collected. They can ask questions about only some of the data,
but they can't tell ceilometer what to collect.
Hi folks,
We'll be having the Savanna team meeting as usual in #openstack-meeting-alt
channel.
Agenda:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/SavannaAgenda#Agenda_for_January.2C_9
http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=Savanna+Meetingiso=20140109T18
--
Sincerely yours,
We're in agreement. What little entry there might be in a system of such
a small size would be entirely manageable by a single administrator...
I care about that deployment, deeply, as that is how things like OpenStack
take root in IT departments.. with somebody playing around. However, what
I
Currently I know, alessandro pilotti has done work and has heat templates for
Windows instances, including deploying ad nodes, exchange and SharePoint.
P
Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE Smartphone
Original message
From: Chan, Winson C
Date:01/08/2014 3:47 PM (GMT-05:00)
- Original Message -
From: Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Sent: Wednesday, January 8, 2014 2:29:22 PM
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Multiple config files for neutron
server
On Wed, 2014-01-08 at 07:21 -0500, Sean Dague wrote:
On
Greetings Stackers!
The VMwareAPI subteam had a two week break from meetings. So happy new
year to all! I hope everyone had a nice break. The Icehouse-2
milestone is coming up January 23rd! That means if you have a patch in
flight right now we need to get you ready for core-reviewers in the
next
On 1/8/2014 12:40 PM, Joe Gordon wrote:
On Jan 8, 2014 7:12 AM, Matt Riedemann mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
mailto:mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
I'd like to propose that we add another item to the list here [1]
that is basically related to what happens when the 3rd party CI job
votes a
Hi All,
As you know the gate has been in particularly bad shape (gate queue over
100!) this week due to a number of factors. One factor is how many major
outstanding bugs we have in the gate. Below is a list of the top 4 open
gate bugs.
Here are some fun facts about this list:
* All bugs have
I need to add an additional layer of authorization between auth_token and
the reporting API.
I know it's as simple as creating a WSGI element and adding it to the
pipeline. Examining the code I haven't figured out where to begin doing
this.
I'm not using Apache and mod_wsgi, just the
1 - 100 of 118 matches
Mail list logo