In principle yes.
You need:
- to write a module to orchestrate the nova flavor API.
- to configure your policy rules in the cloud in question to let the
heat engine user create flavors
-Rob
On 9 February 2014 20:49, ELISHA, Moshe (Moshe)
moshe.eli...@alcatel-lucent.com wrote:
Hello,
I am
Thanks for fixing this.
From: Qiu Yu unic...@gmail.commailto:unic...@gmail.com
Reply-To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.orgmailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Date: Saturday, February 8, 2014 9:44 AM
To: OpenStack Development
Heat template orchestrates user actions, while management of flavors is
typically admin's job (due to their tight link to the physical hardware
configuration, unknown to a regular user).
Regards,
Alex
From: ELISHA, Moshe (Moshe) moshe.eli...@alcatel-lucent.com
To:
Hi Paul
Yes I would be interested in this as I believe its an area we have not got
around to so far in Neutron.
/Alan
From: Paul Michali [mailto:p...@cisco.com]
Sent: February-03-14 5:20 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: [openstack-dev] [Neutron]
On Feb 6, 2014, at 8:52 AM, Luke Gorrie l...@snabb.co wrote:
Howdy!
My name is Luke and I'm helping my friends at Tail-f Systems to
support Neutron with their NCS [1] product. This went really smoothly
for us on the Havana cycle, but lately we're having a harder time with
Icehouse. In
On Feb 6, 2014, at 5:24 PM, Vinay Bannai vban...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello Folks,
We are running into a situation where we are not able to create multiple
provider networks with the same VLAN id. We would like to propose a solution
to remove this restriction through a configuration option.
On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 3:10 PM, Joe Gordon joe.gord...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
I would like to propose removing the simple_tenant_usage and
os-instance_usage_audit_log extensions from the nova V3 API (while
keeping them in V2). Both of these are pre ceilometer extensions to
generate
Hi Gil,
Thanks for the question. I'll start with a quick status update and encourage
anyone interested to participate in the activates listed below as well. IRC is
a great place to bring up questions/discussion topics as well:
-We're currently tracking outstanding activates on a
On 02/09/2014 01:39 PM, Christopher Yeoh wrote:
On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 3:10 PM, Joe Gordon joe.gord...@gmail.com
mailto:joe.gord...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
I would like to propose removing the simple_tenant_usage and
os-instance_usage_audit_log extensions from the nova V3 API
I've just taken a look at the feedback in the whiteboard. If it's ok,
I'd like to take this discussion back to the mailing list. I find the
whiteboards somewhat clumsy for discussions.
Akihiro Motoki points out that all services should work without the
dashboard. Keystone already exposes an API
Kyle Mestery wrote:
So, in general I don't think this will fly because it's my understanding the
OpenStack servers only test fully open source code. Allowing a third party
vendor system to run on the OpenStack servers as part of any functional
testing would open an entirely new can of worms
I would like to nominate Jason Dunsmore for heat-core.
His reviews are valuable and prolific, his code contributions have
demonstrated a good knowledge of heat internals, and he has endured a
sound hazing to get multi-engine into heat.
Very +1
Original message
From: Steve Baker
Date:02/09/2014 4:41 PM (GMT-06:00)
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List
Subject: [openstack-dev] [heat] Nominate Jason Dunsmore for heat-core
I would like to nominate Jason Dunsmore for heat-core.
His reviews are valuable and
Curse you Randall for taking first post!
+1
Excerpts from Randall Burt's message of 2014-02-09 14:47:39 -0800:
Very +1
Original message
From: Steve Baker
Date:02/09/2014 4:41 PM (GMT-06:00)
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List
Subject: [openstack-dev] [heat] Nominate
On Feb 9, 2014, at 4:10 PM, CARVER, PAUL pc2...@att.com wrote:
Kyle Mestery wrote:
So, in general I don't think this will fly because it's my understanding the
OpenStack servers only test fully open source code. Allowing a third party
vendor system to run on the OpenStack servers as part
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 9:10 AM, CARVER, PAUL pc2...@att.com wrote:
Kyle Mestery wrote:
So, in general I don't think this will fly because it's my understanding the
OpenStack servers only test fully open source code. Allowing a third party
vendor system to run on the OpenStack servers as part of
+1
From: Steve Baker [sba...@redhat.com]
Sent: Monday, February 10, 2014 8:38 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List
Subject: [openstack-dev] [heat] Nominate Jason Dunsmore for heat-core
I would like to nominate Jason Dunsmore for heat-core.
His
Hi,
I think the hyper-v CI system is sometimes failing with this message
incorrectly:
This change was unable to be automatically merged with the current state
of the repository. Please rebase your change and upload a new patchset.
I only mention it because its the second time I've seen it.
PetiteCloud is a Free Open Source and Open Knowledge Cloud Foundation Layer
Tool that is designed to make OpenStack more stable and robust. See
http://www.petitecloud.org for more details.
We have recently added support for Linux (Ubuntu 12.04.3 LTS) as a host, we
have had a FreeBSD production
On 02/09/2014 12:56 PM, Kyle Mestery wrote:
On Feb 6, 2014, at 5:24 PM, Vinay Bannai vban...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello Folks,
We are running into a situation where we are not able to create multiple
provider networks with the same VLAN id. We would like to propose a solution
to remove this
On Sun, 2014-02-09 at 18:17 -0700, Christopher Yeoh wrote:
Hi,
I think the hyper-v CI system is sometimes failing with this message
incorrectly:
This change was unable to be automatically merged with the current
state of the repository. Please rebase your change and upload a new
Hi guys,
On 10 Feb 2014, at 03:59 , Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, 2014-02-09 at 18:17 -0700, Christopher Yeoh wrote:
Hi,
I think the hyper-v CI system is sometimes failing with this message
incorrectly:
This change was unable to be automatically merged with the
On 02/06/2014 09:52 AM, Luke Gorrie wrote:
Howdy!
My name is Luke and I'm helping my friends at Tail-f Systems to
support Neutron with their NCS [1] product. This went really smoothly
for us on the Havana cycle, but lately we're having a harder time with
Icehouse. In particular, our attempt
Hi,
I noticed that the Ceilometer project has no strict policy control, the
/etc/ceilometer/policy.json only has one single rule 'context_is_admin',
and for each specific resource operation, it will invoke acl.get_limit_to
and v2._verify_query_segregation to forbid non-admin role operate other
Let's cancel the meeting this week, some of us (me for sure) will be tied up at
the Icehouse mid-cycle meetup.
--
Don Dugger
Censeo Toto nos in Kansa esse decisse. - D. Gale
Ph: 303/443-3786
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
Do you have plans to submit these back upstream? It would be a great first
start, perhaps we could add these as examples underneath the JSON
request/reponse in http://api.openstack.org/api-ref-networking.html
Sean M. Collins
From: Rajdeep Dua
Yes, We would be interested in doing that.
Please let me know which is the right group/ team for this?
On Monday, February 10, 2014 10:34 AM, Collins, Sean
sean_colli...@cable.comcast.com wrote:
Do you have plans to submit these back upstream? It would be a great first
start, perhaps we
I'm interested in it. My timezone is JST(UTC+9).
thanks,
On Mon, Feb 03, 2014 at 05:19:35PM -0500,
Paul Michali p...@cisco.com wrote:
I'd like to see if there is interest in discussing vendor plugins for L3
services. The goal is to strive for consistency across vendor plugins/drivers
and
Hi, all,
Thanks for your comment.
Please let me re-explain.
The main purpose of our blueprint is to use network resources more efficiently.
To complete this purpose, we suggested the method of using 2 lists.
We think, as I wrote before, by listing near glance API servers and using them,
the
As the first patch for service vm framework is ready for review[1][2],
it would be a good idea to have IRC meeting.
Anyone interested in it? How about schedule?
Schedule candidate
Monday 22:00UTC-, 23:00UTC-
Tuesday 22:00UTC-, 23:00UTC-
(Although the slot of servanced service vm[3] can be
On Sat, Feb 08, 2014 at 03:49:46AM +,
Yang, Yi Y yi.y.y...@intel.com wrote:
Hi, All
Hi.
I want to write a new neutron L2 plugin using ML2 framework, I noticed
openvswitch and linxubridge have been ported into ML2 framework, but it seems
many code is removed compared to standalone L2
Hi Isaku Yamahata,
Is it possible to move the below time slot a little earlier like 18.00UTC?
Regards,
Balaji.P
-Original Message-
From: i y [mailto:yamahat...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Isaku Yamahata
Sent: Monday, February 10, 2014 11:42 AM
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Cc:
What's your timezone?
18.00UTC doesn't work for me because my timezone is UTC+9 and it's 3:00AM.
thanks,
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 06:43:05AM +,
balaj...@freescale.com balaj...@freescale.com wrote:
Hi Isaku Yamahata,
Is it possible to move the below time slot a little earlier like
Hi Isaku Yamahata,
We are at UTC+5.30.[IST]
Regards,
Balaji.P
-Original Message-
From: i y [mailto:yamahat...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Isaku Yamahata
Sent: Monday, February 10, 2014 12:36 PM
To: P Balaji-B37839; OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage
questions)
Cc: Isaku
+1
On 02/09/2014 11:38 PM, Steve Baker wrote:
I would like to nominate Jason Dunsmore for heat-core.
His reviews are valuable and prolific, his code contributions have
demonstrated a good knowledge of heat internals, and he has endured a
sound hazing to get multi-engine into heat.
Hi everyone,
Is there anyone can kindly tell me how to join your conference?
^^
-邮件原件-
发件人: balaj...@freescale.com [mailto:balaj...@freescale.com]
发送时间: 2014年2月10日 15:11
收件人: Isaku Yamahata; OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage
questions)
主题: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron]
36 matches
Mail list logo
