Re: [openstack-dev] [Murano] Need a new DSL for Murano

2014-02-15 Thread Alexander Tivelkov
Hi Joshua, Thank you very much for you feedback! This is really a great question, and it was the first question we've asked ourselves when we started thinking about this new design. We've considered both options: to have our own syntax (python-like, java-like, something-else-like) or to use YAML.

[openstack-dev] [ceilometer] Unable to run unit test cases

2014-02-15 Thread Akhil Sadashiv Hingane
When I try to run the test cases for ceilometer, it fails with Traceback (most recent call last): File /usr/local/bin/tox, line 9, in module load_entry_point('tox==1.7.0', 'console_scripts',

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder][neutron][nova][3rd party testing] Gerrit Jenkins plugin will not fulfill requirements of 3rd party testing

2014-02-15 Thread Sergey Lukjanov
Sukhdev, that's awesome, I think it'll be great to make folks able to start from something easy configurable like gerrit trigger plugin. On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 6:01 AM, Sukhdev Kapur sukh...@aristanetworks.comwrote: On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 12:39 PM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote: On

Re: [openstack-dev] [Murano] Need a new DSL for Murano

2014-02-15 Thread Stan Lagun
Just to add my 2 cents. 1. YAML is already familiar to OpenStack developers as Heat and others use it. So at least the syntax (not to mess with semantics) doesn't have to be learned. 2. YAML parser is very flexible an can be extended with additional types or constructs like Key: filename.yaml to

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][EC2] attach and detach volume response status

2014-02-15 Thread Rushi Agrawal
I remember seeing the same while attaching -- return value is 'detached'. So I can confirm this is a bug. I couldn't locate a bug report for it, so I created one: https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1280572 Please mark it as a dup if you already have a bug report. Regards, Rushi Agrawal Ph:

Re: [openstack-dev] OpenStack-dev Digest, Vol 22, Issue 39

2014-02-15 Thread Vinod Kumar Boppanna
Dear Vish, I completely agree with you. Its like a trade off between getting re-authenticated (when in a hierarchy user has different roles at different levels) or parsing the entire hierarchy till the leaf and include all the roles the user has at each level in the scope. I am ok with any

[openstack-dev] [Nova][EC2][Cinder] Asking for time to review my patches

2014-02-15 Thread Rushi Agrawal
Over the last two months, I have submitted few patches which increases support of block storage volumes in OpenStack's EC2 API. The blueprints for them have been approved, and the code is ready for review. * Expose volume type https://review.openstack.org/#/c/61041/ * Expose volume tags

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] [TripleO] consistency vs packages in TripleO

2014-02-15 Thread Dan Prince
- Original Message - From: Robert Collins robe...@robertcollins.net To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Cc: openstack-operat...@lists.openstack.org Sent: Friday, February 14, 2014 11:12:12 PM Subject: Re:

Re: [openstack-dev] [ceilometer] Unable to run unit test cases

2014-02-15 Thread Henry Gessau
On Sat, Feb 15, at 4:41 am, Akhil Sadashiv Hingane wrote: When I try to run the test cases for ceilometer, it fails with Traceback (most recent call last): File /usr/local/bin/tox, line 9,

Re: [openstack-dev] VPC Proposal

2014-02-15 Thread Harshad Nakil
EIP will be allocated from public pools. So in effect public pools and shared networks are only DC admin functions. Not available to VPC users. There is a implicit external gateway. When one creates NAT instance or VPN instance, external interfaces of these interfaces come from the shared network

Re: [openstack-dev] [ceilometer] Unable to run unit test cases

2014-02-15 Thread Clark Boylan
On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 6:45 AM, Henry Gessau ges...@cisco.com wrote: On Sat, Feb 15, at 4:41 am, Akhil Sadashiv Hingane wrote: When I try to run the test cases for ceilometer, it fails with

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] consistency vs packages in TripleO

2014-02-15 Thread James Slagle
On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 11:12 PM, Robert Collins robe...@robertcollins.net wrote: On 15 February 2014 08:42, Dan Prince dpri...@redhat.com wrote: Option B is we make our job easy by strong arming everyone into the same defaults of our upstream choosing. Does Nova strong arm everyone into

Re: [openstack-dev] request for testing new cloud foundation layer on bare metal

2014-02-15 Thread Aryeh Friedman
Very quick note it turns out our mailing lists archives where private I have no marked them as public. If the links didn't work for you in the last 24 hrs try again. On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 2:40 AM, Aryeh Friedman aryeh.fried...@gmail.comwrote: We apologize for the unclearness of our

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Proposal for model change - Multiple services per floating IP

2014-02-15 Thread Eugene Nikanorov
Stephen, Aah, Ok. FWIW, splitting up the VIP into instance/floating IP entity Right now I'm not sure what would be the best. Currently we don't have implementation that allows creating VIP on external network directly. For example, when haproxy VIP is created, it has address on the tenant

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] [TripleO] consistency vs packages in TripleO

2014-02-15 Thread Chris Jones
Hi Assuming I am interpreting your mail correctly, I think option A makes vastly more sense, with one very specific provision I'd add. More on that in a moment. Option B, the idea that we would mangle a package-installed environment to suit our desired layout, is not going to work out well for

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] [TripleO] consistency vs packages in TripleO

2014-02-15 Thread Clint Byrum
Excerpts from Dan Prince's message of 2014-02-15 06:05:30 -0800: - Original Message - From: Robert Collins robe...@robertcollins.net To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Cc: openstack-operat...@lists.openstack.org

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] consistency vs packages in TripleO

2014-02-15 Thread Clint Byrum
Excerpts from James Slagle's message of 2014-02-15 13:02:36 -0800: On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 11:12 PM, Robert Collins robe...@robertcollins.net wrote: On 15 February 2014 08:42, Dan Prince dpri...@redhat.com wrote: Option B is we make our job easy by strong arming everyone into the same

Re: [openstack-dev] [Murano] Need a new DSL for Murano

2014-02-15 Thread Clint Byrum
Excerpts from Alexander Tivelkov's message of 2014-02-14 18:17:10 -0800: Hi folks, Murano matures, and we are getting more and more feedback from our early adopters. The overall reception is very positive, but at the same time there are some complaints as well. By now the most significant

[openstack-dev] [Trove] Trove-Gate timeouts

2014-02-15 Thread Lowery, Mathew
Hi all, Issue #1: Jobs that need more than one hour Of the last 30 Trove-Gatehttps://rdjenkins.dyndns.org/job/Trove-Gate/ builds (spanning three days), 7 have failed due to a Jenkins job-level timeout (not a proboscis timeout). These jobs had no failed tests when the timeout occurred. Not

Re: [openstack-dev] VPC Proposal

2014-02-15 Thread Martin, JC
Harshad, Thanks, What happens when I create two VPC ? Beside the project private networks, what is isolated ? What do you call DC admin ? I know two administrators : - Cloud administrators - VPC admnistrator Are you saying that VPCs cannot have their own external gateways and NAT pools

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Interest in discussing vendor plugins for L3 services?

2014-02-15 Thread Paul Michali
Great! Looks like we have a bunch of people interested in this. Given the Neutron deadline for I-3, I'll wait and try to setup in IRC for next week. From there, if there's enough interest, we can try to get a session to discuss at the Summit. I'd love to hear the ideas and thoughts on this

[openstack-dev] [Neutron] Urgent questions on Service Type Framework for VPNaaS

2014-02-15 Thread Paul Michali
Hi Nachi and other cores! I'm very close to publishing my vendor based VPNaaS driver (service driver is ready, device driver is a day or two out), but have a bit of an issue. This code uses the Service Type Framework, which, as you know, is still out for review (and has been idle for a long

Re: [openstack-dev] bad default values in conf files

2014-02-15 Thread Michael Chapman
Have the folks creating our puppet modules and install recommendations taken a close look at all the options and determined that the defaults are appropriate for deploying RHEL OSP in the configurations we are recommending? If by our puppet modules you mean the ones in stackforge, in the vast

[openstack-dev] [Nova][VMWare] VMwareVCDriver related to resize/cold migration

2014-02-15 Thread Jay Lau
Hey, I have one question related with OpenStack vmwareapi.VMwareVCDriver resize/cold migration. The following is my configuration: DC | |Cluster1 | | | |9.111.249.56 | |Cluster2 | |9.111.249.49 *Scenario

Re: [openstack-dev] [Solum] Question about Zuul's role in Solum

2014-02-15 Thread Jay Pipes
On Sat, 2014-02-15 at 17:20 +1300, Robert Collins wrote: On 15 February 2014 14:34, Fox, Kevin M kevin@pnnl.gov wrote: I think a lot of projects don't bother to gate, because its far to much work to set up a workable system. I can think of several projects I've worked on that would

Re: [openstack-dev] VPC Proposal

2014-02-15 Thread Harshad Nakil
Comments Inline Regards -Harshad On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 3:18 PM, Martin, JC jch.mar...@gmail.com wrote: Harshad, Thanks, What happens when I create two VPC ? Beside the project private networks, what is isolated ? Since VPC is mapped to project. All the isolation provided by the project

Re: [openstack-dev] [Trove] Trove-Gate timeouts

2014-02-15 Thread Mirantis
Hello, Mathew. I'm seeing same issues with the gate. I also tried to found out why gate job is failing. First ran into issue related to cinder installation failure in devstack. But then I found same problem as you described. The best option is to increase job time range. Thanks for such

Re: [openstack-dev] VPC Proposal

2014-02-15 Thread Allamaraju, Subbu
True. The domain hierarchy isn't useful to capture resource sharing across a VPC. For instance, if a VPC admin would like to scope certain networks or images to a projects managed within a VPC, there isn't an abstraction today. Subbu On Feb 14, 2014, at 11:42 AM, Martin, JC

Re: [openstack-dev] VPC Proposal

2014-02-15 Thread Allamaraju, Subbu
Harshad, Curious to know if there is a broad interest in an AWS compatible API in the community? To clarify, a clear incremental path from an AWS compatible API to an OpenStack model is not clear. Subbu On Feb 15, 2014, at 10:04 PM, Harshad Nakil hna...@contrailsystems.com wrote: I agree