[openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] L7 data types

2014-02-16 Thread Avishay Balderman
Hi There are 2 fields in the L7 model that are candidates for being a closed set (Enum). I would like to hear your opinion. Entity: L7Rule Field : type Description: this field holds the part of the request where we should look for a value Possible values: URL,HEADER,BODY,(?) Entity: L7Rule

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] role of Domain in VPC definition

2014-02-16 Thread Salvatore Orlando
It seems this work item is made of several blueprints, some of which are not yet approved. This is true at least for the Neutron blueprint regarding policy extensions. Since I first looked at this spec I've been wondering why nova has been selected as an endpoint for network operations rather

Re: [openstack-dev] [Solum] Question about Zuul's role in Solum

2014-02-16 Thread Robert Collins
On 16 February 2014 17:57, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote: Personally, I believe having Gerrit and Jenkins as the default will turn more people off Solumn than attract them to it. Just because we in the OpenStack community love our gating workflow and think it's all groovy does not mean

Re: [openstack-dev] bad default values in conf files

2014-02-16 Thread Robert Collins
On 15 February 2014 12:15, Dirk Müller d...@dmllr.de wrote: I agree, and changing defaults has a cost as well: Every deployment solution out there has to detect the value change, update their config templates and potentially also migrate the setting from the old to the new default for

Re: [openstack-dev] [Solum] Question about Zuul's role in Solum

2014-02-16 Thread Adrian Otto
On Feb 16, 2014, at 2:31 AM, Robert Collins robe...@robertcollins.net wrote: On 16 February 2014 17:57, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote: Personally, I believe having Gerrit and Jenkins as the default will turn more people off Solumn than attract them to it. Just because we in the

[openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] L7 data types

2014-02-16 Thread Avishay Balderman
(removing extra space from the subject - let email clients apply their filters) From: Avishay Balderman Sent: Sunday, February 16, 2014 9:56 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] L7 data types Hi There are 2 fields in the L7

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][VMWare] VMwareVCDriver related to resize/cold migration

2014-02-16 Thread Gary Kotton
Hi, There are two issues here. The first is a bug fix that is in review: - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/69209/ (this is where they have the same configuration) The second is WIP: - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/69262/ (we need to restore) Thanks Gary From: Jay Lau

[openstack-dev] [Neutron]Do you think tanent_id should be verified

2014-02-16 Thread Dong Liu
Hi stackers: I found that when creating network subnet and other resources, the attribute tenant_id can be set by admin tenant. But we did not verify that if the tanent_id is real in keystone. I know that we could use neutron without keystone, but do you think tenant_id should be verified

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][VMWare] VMwareVCDriver related to resize/cold migration

2014-02-16 Thread Jay Lau
Thanks Gary, clear now. ;-) 2014-02-16 21:40 GMT+08:00 Gary Kotton gkot...@vmware.com: Hi, There are two issues here. The first is a bug fix that is in review: - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/69209/ (this is where they have the same configuration) The second is WIP: -

[openstack-dev] [neutron][policy] Using network services with network policies

2014-02-16 Thread Mohammad Banikazemi
During the last IRC call we started talking about network services and how they can be integrated into the group Policy framework. In particular, with the redirect action we need to think how we can specify the network services we want to redirect the traffic to/from. There has been a

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][VMWare] VMwareVCDriver related to resize/cold migration

2014-02-16 Thread Jay Lau
Hi Gary, One more question, when using VCDriver, I can use it in the following two ways: 1) start up many nova computes and those nova computes manage same vcenter clusters. 2) start up many nova computes and those nova computes manage different vcenter clusters. Do we have some best practice

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] role of Domain in VPC definition

2014-02-16 Thread Harshad Nakil
Yes, [1] can be done without [2] and [3]. As you are well aware [2] is now merged with group policy discussions. IMHO all or nothing approach will not get us anywhere. By the time we line up all our ducks in row. New features/ideas/blueprints will keep Emerging. Regards -Harshad On Feb 16,

Re: [openstack-dev] VPC Proposal

2014-02-16 Thread Harshad Nakil
Comments Inline Regards -Harshad On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 11:39 PM, Allamaraju, Subbu su...@subbu.org wrote: Harshad, Curious to know if there is a broad interest in an AWS compatible API in the community? We started looking at this as some our customers/partners were interested in get

Re: [openstack-dev] VPC Proposal

2014-02-16 Thread Allamaraju, Subbu
Harshad, Thanks for clarifying. We started looking at this as some our customers/partners were interested in get AWS API compatibility. We have this blueprint and code review pending for long time now. We will know based on this thread wether the community is interested. But I assumed

Re: [openstack-dev] VPC Proposal

2014-02-16 Thread Harshad Nakil
IMHO I don't see two implementations. Since right now we have only one. As a community if we decide to add new abstractions then we will have to change software in every component where the new abstraction makes difference. That's normal software development process. Regards -Harshad On Feb 16,

Re: [openstack-dev] VPC Proposal

2014-02-16 Thread Martin, JC
Harshad, I tried to find some discussion around this blueprint. Could you provide us with some notes or threads ? Also, about the code review you mention. which one are you talking about : https://review.openstack.org/#/c/40071/ https://review.openstack.org/#/c/49470/

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] role of Domain in VPC definition

2014-02-16 Thread Allamaraju, Subbu
Harshad, But the key question that Ravi brought up remains though. A project is a very small administrative container to manage policies and resources for VPCs. We've been experimenting with VPCs on OpenStack (with some mods) at work for nearly a year, and came across cases where

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] role of Domain in VPC definition

2014-02-16 Thread Harshad Nakil
As said I am not disagreeing with you or Ravi or JC. I also agree that Openstack VPC implementation will benefit from these proposals. What I am saying is it is not required AWS VPC API compatibility at this point. Which is what our blueprint is all about. We are not defining THE VPC. Let me ask

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] role of Domain in VPC definition

2014-02-16 Thread Allamaraju, Subbu
Harshad, This is great. At least there is consensus on what it is and what it is not. I would leave it to others to discuss merits of a an AWS compat VPC API for Icehouse. Perhaps this is a good topic to discuss at the Juno design summit. Subbu On Feb 16, 2014, at 10:15 AM, Harshad Nakil

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra] [TripleO] promoting devtest_seed and devtest_undercloud to voting, + experimental queue for nova/neutron etc.

2014-02-16 Thread Robert Collins
On 15 February 2014 09:58, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote: Lastly, I'm going to propose a merge to infra/config to put our undercloud story (which exercises the seed's ability to deploy via heat with bare metal) as a check experimental job on our dependencies (keystone, glance, nova,

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra] [TripleO] promoting devtest_seed and devtest_undercloud to voting, + experimental queue for nova/neutron etc.

2014-02-16 Thread Robert Collins
On 15 February 2014 12:21, James E. Blair jebl...@openstack.org wrote: You won't end up with -1's everywhere, you'll end up with jobs stuck in the queue indefinitely, as we saw when the tripleo cloud failed recently. What's worse is that now that positive check results are required for

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] role of Domain in VPC definition

2014-02-16 Thread Ravi Chunduru
I agree with JC that we need to pause and discuss VPC model with in openstack before considering AWS compatibility. As Subbu said, We need this discussion in Juno summit and get consensus. Thanks, -Ravi. On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 10:31 AM, Allamaraju, Subbu su...@subbu.org wrote: Harshad,

Re: [openstack-dev] VPC Proposal

2014-02-16 Thread Ravi Chunduru
IMO, VPC means to have managed set of resources not just limited to networks but also projects. I feel its not about incrementally starting with AWS compatibility, But doing it right with AWS compatibility into consideration. Thanks, -Ravi. On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 8:47 AM, Harshad Nakil

Re: [openstack-dev] OpenStack-dev Digest, Vol 22, Issue 39

2014-02-16 Thread Vishvananda Ishaya
On Feb 15, 2014, at 4:36 AM, Vinod Kumar Boppanna vinod.kumar.boppa...@cern.ch wrote: Dear Vish, I completely agree with you. Its like a trade off between getting re-authenticated (when in a hierarchy user has different roles at different levels) or parsing the entire hierarchy till

[openstack-dev] [Neutron] [Ceilometer] Is the l3-metering-agent broken just for me?

2014-02-16 Thread Aurynn Shaw
Hey; I'm trying to get the l3 metering agent included in Neutron to do... something, and I suspect that I'm doing something terribly wrong. I'm looking at the docs on https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Neutron/Metering/Bandwidth and trying to run it on Devstack (yes, I know), and I was wondering

Re: [openstack-dev] heat run_tests.sh fails with one huge line of output

2014-02-16 Thread Robert Collins
On 17 February 2014 10:20, Mike Spreitzer mspre...@us.ibm.com wrote: Kevin, I changed no code, it was a fresh DevStack install. Thanks Robert, I tried following your leads but got nowhere, perhaps I need a few more clues. I am not familiar with bzr (nor baz), and it wasn't obvious to me how

Re: [openstack-dev] heat run_tests.sh fails with one huge line of output

2014-02-16 Thread Alexander Gorodnev
Hi Mike, Looks like you have some syntax error for some accidental reason. Could you please do the following: 0) install flake8; 1) run ./run_tests.sh -p pep8.log into your Heat directory; 2) Attach to the letter and send it to the list. Thank you, Alexander 2014-02-17 1:20 GMT+04:00 Mike

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron]Do you think tanent_id should be verified

2014-02-16 Thread Dolph Mathews
keystoneclient.middlware.auth_token passes a project ID (and name, for convenience) to the underlying application through the WSGI environment, and already ensures that this value can not be manipulated by the end user. Project ID's (redundantly) passed through other means, such as URLs, are up

Re: [openstack-dev] [Horizon] User Signup

2014-02-16 Thread Kieran Spear
On 15 February 2014 16:52, Soren Hansen so...@linux2go.dk wrote: Den 15/02/2014 00.19 skrev Adam Young ayo...@redhat.com: Could you please spend 5 minutes on the blueprint https://blueprints.launchpad.net/horizon/+spec/user-registration and add your suggestions in the white board. Does it

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Urgent questions on Service Type Framework for VPNaaS

2014-02-16 Thread Sumit Naiksatam
Hi Paul, Our plan with FWaaS was to get it to parity with LBaaS as far as STF is concerned. That way any changes to STF can be explored in the context of all services, and the migration can also be performed for all services. Accordingly, Gary Duan has been actively working on the patch:

Re: [openstack-dev] heat run_tests.sh fails with one huge line of output

2014-02-16 Thread Mike Spreitzer
Robert Collins robe...@robertcollins.net wrote on 02/16/2014 05:26:50 PM: I would have expected run_tests.sh to tox which creates a venv, but heat seems different. So you'll need to install testrepository via your system tox, not one from a venv. I don't think I have a system tox. `pip list

Re: [openstack-dev] heat run_tests.sh fails with one huge line of output

2014-02-16 Thread Robert Collins
On 17 February 2014 13:50, Mike Spreitzer mspre...@us.ibm.com wrote: Robert Collins robe...@robertcollins.net wrote on 02/16/2014 05:26:50 PM: I would have expected run_tests.sh to tox which creates a venv, but heat seems different. So you'll need to install testrepository via your system

[openstack-dev] [TripleO][review] Please treat -1s on check-tripleo-*-precise as voting.

2014-02-16 Thread Robert Collins
Hi! The nascent tripleo-gate is now running on all tripleo repositories, *and should pass*, but are not yet voting. They aren't voting because we cannot submit to the gate unless jenkins votes verified... *and* we have no redundancy for the tripleo-ci cloud now, so any glitch in the current

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Group Policy questions

2014-02-16 Thread Mohammad Banikazemi
Hi Carlos, We have just started looking at the same issues you have mentioned. Please follow the email thread started by me earlier today ([openstack-dev] [neutron][policy] Using network services with network policies). We will be spending more time on these topics during our upcoming weekly IRC

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][EC2] attach and detach volume response status

2014-02-16 Thread Rui Chen
Thanks for confirming it, I add some comments in the bug :) 2014-02-15 20:23 GMT+08:00 Rushi Agrawal rushi@gmail.com: I remember seeing the same while attaching -- return value is 'detached'. So I can confirm this is a bug. I couldn't locate a bug report for it, so I created one:

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Should we limit the disk IO bandwidth in copy_image while creating new instance?

2014-02-16 Thread Wangpan
Hi Sylvain, The default value can be set to 0 ro -1, which means no limitation, I think decreasing the niceness of nova-compute or cp/rsync/scp will also need a configation, because we cann't decrease it manully while the copy_image is running. My another consideration is only decreasing the

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Should we limit the disk IO bandwidth in copy_image while creating new instance?

2014-02-16 Thread Wangpan
Hi sahid, I have tested `scp -l xxx src dst` (local scp copy) and believe that the `-l` option is invalid in this situation, it seems that `-l` only valid in remote copy. 2014-02-17 Wangpan 发件人:sahid sahid.ferdja...@cloudwatt.com 发送时间:2014-02-14 17:58 主题:Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Should

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Should we limit the disk IO bandwidth in copy_image while creating new instance?

2014-02-16 Thread Wangpan
Hi yunhong, I agree with you of the taking I/O bandwidth as a resource, but it may be not so easy to implement. Your another thinking about the launch time may be not so terrible, only the first boot it will be affected. 2014-02-17 Wangpan 发件人:yunhong jiang yunhong.ji...@linux.intel.com

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] role of Domain in VPC definition

2014-02-16 Thread Joe Gordon
On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 3:26 AM, Salvatore Orlando sorla...@nicira.com wrote: It seems this work item is made of several blueprints, some of which are not yet approved. This is true at least for the Neutron blueprint regarding policy extensions. Since I first looked at this spec I've been

[openstack-dev] [TripleO][Neutron] Urgent python-neutronclient release needed

2014-02-16 Thread Robert Collins
https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1280941 I haven't done a chapter-and-verse trace of what happened, but it looks like a latent bug in the neutronclient lib was tickled by some neutron change, fixed in neutronclient, and then neutron started using the feature without bumping

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Nominate Oleg Bondarev for Core

2014-02-16 Thread Armando M.
+1 On Feb 13, 2014 5:52 PM, Nachi Ueno na...@ntti3.com wrote: +1 2014年2月12日水曜日、Mayur Patilram.nath241...@gmail.comさんは書きました: +1 *--* *Cheers,* *Mayur* ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org

Re: [openstack-dev] [Trove] Trove-Gate timeouts

2014-02-16 Thread Craig Vyvial
Trovesters, One reason for the longer running test was that for the configuration groups i added a creation of a new instance. This is to test a new instance will be created with a configuration group applied. This might be causing the run to be a little longer but i am surprised that its taking

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [group-policy] Changing the meeting time

2014-02-16 Thread Isaku Yamahata
I'd like to make it sure. The followings pages seems still have old time. Which is correct? 1700UTC or 1900UTC Thursday? https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Neutron_Group_Policy https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings#Neutron_Group_Policy_Sub-Team_Meeting Thanks, On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at

Re: [openstack-dev] Version Discovery Standardization

2014-02-16 Thread Jamie Lennox
On Thu, 2014-02-13 at 19:35 -0700, Christopher Yeoh wrote: On Thu, 13 Feb 2014 21:10:01 -0500 Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote: On 02/13/2014 08:28 PM, Christopher Yeoh wrote: On Thu, 13 Feb 2014 15:54:23 -0500 Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote: So one question I have around a

Re: [openstack-dev] [Mistral] Notes on action YAML declaration and naming

2014-02-16 Thread Renat Akhmerov
On 15 Feb 2014, at 04:01, Nikolay Makhotkin nmakhot...@mirantis.com wrote: Dmitri, in our concerns under word 'input' we assume a block contains the info about how the input data will be taken for corresponding task from initial context. So, it will be a kind of expression (e.g. YAQL).

Re: [openstack-dev] [Mistral] Notes on action YAML declaration and naming

2014-02-16 Thread Renat Akhmerov
Dmitri, Right now https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/mistral-poc is the only place where we described it. It shouldn’t be considered a specification, it was rather a playground where we tried to shape up our ideas. We’ll fix it using our latest ideas and changes captured in the code and create

Re: [openstack-dev] Glance plugin in Nova should switch to using buffered http

2014-02-16 Thread Sridevi K R Koushik
Hi John, I have made the changes you suggested. And, yes, we've tested this out in a live system. On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 1:43 AM, John Garbutt john.garb...@rackspace.co.ukwrote: Its too late for this cycle. We will have to wait until Juno for any blueprints.

Re: [openstack-dev] Version Discovery Standardization

2014-02-16 Thread Jamie Lennox
On Thu, 2014-02-13 at 08:45 -0600, Dean Troyer wrote: FWIW, an early proposal to address this, as well as capability discovery, still lives at https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/api-version-discovery-proposal. I've lost track of where this went, and even which design summit this is from, but

[openstack-dev] [cinder]Multiple backends

2014-02-16 Thread iKhan
Hi All, I'm just curious on how the manager.py is choosing backend while creating volume, I know volume type is set but where is this being processed? I am sorry if this is a basic question, but didn't got any help from #openstack-dev IRC channel so was left without option to post here. --

Re: [openstack-dev] Version Discovery Standardization

2014-02-16 Thread Jamie Lennox
On Thu, 2014-02-13 at 08:37 -0500, Sean Dague wrote: On 02/13/2014 07:50 AM, Jamie Lennox wrote: Hi all, I am one of i think a number of efforts trying to make clients be interoperable between different versions of an API. What i would like to talk about specifically here are the

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder]Multiple backends

2014-02-16 Thread Subramanian
I think you should look at the cinder scheduler code that selects a host based on the volume type. https://github.com/openstack/cinder/tree/master/cinder/scheduler. BTW, cinder dev tend to hang out on #openstack-cinder channel. Thanks, Subbu On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 11:35 AM, iKhan

[openstack-dev] [nova] pci device hotplug

2014-02-16 Thread Gouzongmei
Hello, In current PCI passthrough implementation, a pci device is only allowed to be assigned to a instance while the instance is being created, it is not allowed to be assigned or removed from the instance while the instance is running or stop. Besides, I noticed that the basic

[openstack-dev] [python-swiftclient] Python swiftclient should switch to using bufferedhttp.

2014-02-16 Thread Amala Basha Alungal
Hi, I'm looking for few reviews on *use-bufferedhttp-in-swiftclient https://blueprints.launchpad.net/python-swiftclient/+spec/use-bufferedhttp-in-swiftclient* and use-expect-100-continue-header-while-uploadinghttps://blueprints.launchpad.net/python-swiftclient/+spec/should-use-100-continue-header

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Group Policy questions

2014-02-16 Thread Sumit Naiksatam
Hi, Apologies for chiming in late on this. Yes, we have been incubating the service insertion and chaining features [2] for some time now. The plan was to have a FW-VPN chain working by Icehouse release. Towards that end the first step was to introduce the notion of a service insertion context

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][policy] Using network services with network policies

2014-02-16 Thread Sumit Naiksatam
Thanks Mohammad for bringing this up. I responded in another thread: http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2014-February/027306.html ~Sumit. On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 7:27 AM, Mohammad Banikazemi m...@us.ibm.com wrote: During the last IRC call we started talking about network

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] L7 data types

2014-02-16 Thread Oleg Bondarev
Hi, I would add another candidate for being a closed set: L7VipPolicyAssociation.action (use_backend, block, etc.) Thanks, Oleg On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 3:53 PM, Avishay Balderman avish...@radware.comwrote: (removing extra space from the subject - let email clients apply their filters)

Re: [openstack-dev] [Trove] Trove-Gate timeouts

2014-02-16 Thread Denis Makogon
Hi, Craig. Yes, i thought about configurations test suits. For now core team, maybe, should extend gate running time. But for the tempest tests i would suggest to exclude some tests from 'gate'-group (the longest ones). We need to deal with it asap, because gate failing for four or five days.

Re: [openstack-dev] [Murano] Need a new DSL for Murano

2014-02-16 Thread Renat Akhmerov
Clint, We're collaborating with Murano. We may need to do it in a way that others could see it though. There are several things here: Murano doesn’t really have a “workflow engine” similar to Mistral’s. People get confused with that but it’s just a legacy terminology, I think Murano folks

Re: [openstack-dev] Version Discovery Standardization

2014-02-16 Thread Jamie Lennox
On Mon, 2014-02-17 at 16:09 +1000, Jamie Lennox wrote: On Thu, 2014-02-13 at 08:37 -0500, Sean Dague wrote: On 02/13/2014 07:50 AM, Jamie Lennox wrote: Hi all, I am one of i think a number of efforts trying to make clients be interoperable between different versions of an API.

[openstack-dev] [Mistral] Community meeting reminder - 02/17/2014

2014-02-16 Thread Renat Akhmerov
Hi, This is a reminder that we’ll have an IRC community meeting today at #openstack-meeting at 16.00 UTC. Here’s the agenda: Review action items Discuss current status Continue DSL discussion Open discussion (roadblocks, suggestions, etc.) Please let us know if you have other topics to