Thanks, guys!
Done.
On 20 Mar 2014, at 02:28, Timur Nurlygayanov tnurlygaya...@mirantis.com wrote:
Also, in the future, we can join Kirill Izotov to the core team too.
Absolutely, once in a while we’ll be reviewing everyone’s progress and update
the core team.
Hi,
Just a reminder that the weekly Nova API meeting is being held tomorrow
Friday UTC .
We encourage cloud operators and those who use the REST API such as
SDK developers and others who and are interested in the future of the
API to participate.
In other timezones the meeting is at:
EST
Hi folks, my comments inlined:
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 6:13 AM, Youcef Laribi youcef.lar...@citrix.comwrote:
Jorge,
Thanks for taking the time to put up a requirements list. Some comments
below:
- Static IP Addresses
- Our current Cloud Load Balancing (CLB) offering utilizes
Hi List,
I was looking at the etherpad and March 19 notes and have few Qs
1) How is the DR middleware (depicted in Ron's youtube video) different
than the replication agent (noted in the March 19 etherpad notes). Are
they same, if not, how/why are they different ?
2) Maybe a dumb Q.. but
Hi Dims!
I have submitted my proposal to the Google GSoC site and I will upload it
to the OpenStack GSoC wiki soon.
Could you please review it for me?
Please inform me if anything else is needed.
Thank you,
Dániel Csubák (csuby)
2014-03-18 16:19 GMT+01:00 Davanum Srinivas dava...@gmail.com:
HI, all
cause of the Juno, the PCI discuss keen open, for group VS to
flavor/extra-information based solution. there is a use case, which
group based
solution can not supported well.
please considerate of this, and choose the flavor/extra-information
based solution.
Groups problem:
I: exposed
On Tue, 18 Mar 2014 19:52:27 +0100
Koderer, Marc m.kode...@telekom.de wrote:
Am I missing something or are these schemas being added now just a
subset of what is being used for negative testing? Why can't we
either add the extra negative test info around the new test
validation patches
On Thu, 2014-03-20 at 01:28 +, Joshua Harlow wrote:
Proxying from yahoo's open source director (since he wasn't initially
subscribed to this list, afaik he now is) on his behalf.
From Gil Yehuda (Yahoo’s Open Source director).
I would urge you to avoid creating a dependency between
On Wed, 19 Mar 2014, Sullivan, Jon Paul wrote:
From: James Slagle [mailto:james.sla...@gmail.com]
Sent: 18 March 2014 19:58
Subject: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Alternating meeting time for more TZ
friendliness
Our current meeting time is Tuesdays at 19:00 UTC. I think this works
ok
On 03/20/2014 01:30 AM, Radcliffe, Mark wrote:
The problem with AGPL is that the scope is very uncertain and the
determination of the consequences are very fact intensive. I was the
chair of the User Committee in developing the GPLv3 and I am therefor
quite familiar with the legal issues. The
Just out of curiosity: what is the purpose of project warm? From the wiki
page and the sample it looks pretty much like what Heat is doing.
And warm is almost HOT so could you imagine your use cases can just be
addressed by Heat using HOT templates?
Regards,
Thomas
sahid
On 03/19/2014 10:54 PM, Joe Gordon wrote:
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 9:25 AM, Miguel Angel Ajo majop...@redhat.com
mailto:majop...@redhat.com wrote:
An advance on the changes that it's requiring to have a
py-c++ compiled rootwrap as a mitigation POC for havana/icehouse.
Hi all,
First of all, thanks for your suggestions!
To summarize the discussions here:
1. We are not going to install Mongo (because is's wrong ?)
2. Idea about spawning several collectors is suspicious (btw there is a
patch that run several collectors: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/79962/.)
On 03/20/2014 05:49 AM, Nadya Privalova wrote:
Hi all,
First of all, thanks for your suggestions!
To summarize the discussions here:
1. We are not going to install Mongo (because is's wrong ?)
We are not going to install Mongo not from base distribution, because
we don't do that for things
Hi All,
Me and my fellow friends (CCed) invite the community to review OpenStack
Neutron Port Templates Network Policy blueprint submitted recently.
Please review the same and feel free to suggest, comment and ask questions.
Link to Open Stack blueprint page
Hi,
Re-architecting the schema might fix most of the performance issues of
resource_list.
And also, must do some work to improve the performance of meter-list.
Is the Gordon's blue print gonna cover the both aspects ?
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ceilometer/+spec/big-data-sql
Christopher Yeoh wrote:
The patch was merged in October (just after Icehouse opened) and so has
been used in clouds that do CD for quite a while. After some discussion
on IRC I think we'll end up having to leave this backwards incompatible
change in there - given there are most likely users
Hi All,
Me and my fellow friends (CCed) invite the community to review OpenStack
Neutron Port Templates Framework blueprint submitted recently.
Please review the same and feel free to suggest, comment and ask questions.
Link to Open Stack blueprint page
Sean, thank for analysis.
JFYI, I did some initial profiling, it's described here
https://www.mail-archive.com/openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org/msg19030.html.
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 2:15 PM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote:
On 03/20/2014 05:49 AM, Nadya Privalova wrote:
Hi all,
First of
Hi All,
I would like you to go through a blueprint I submitted recently and get early
comments from you, so that it covers all the use cases and anything else which
will improve the blueprint.
Link to Open Stack blueprint page
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/neutron-auditlogging
On 03/20/2014 05:31 AM, Miguel Angel Ajo wrote:
On 03/19/2014 10:54 PM, Joe Gordon wrote:
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 9:25 AM, Miguel Angel Ajo majop...@redhat.com
mailto:majop...@redhat.com wrote:
An advance on the changes that it's requiring to have a
py-c++ compiled rootwrap as a
Hello all,
I have been working on adding tests in Tempest for Marconi, for the last few
months.
While there are many amazing people to work with, the process has been more
difficult than I expected.
Couple of pain-points and suggestions to make the process easier for myself
future
Hi,
As said here [1], please don't send review requests directly to the ML.
[1]
http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2013-September/015264.html
2014-03-20 12:08 GMT+01:00 Kamat, Maruti Haridas maruti.ka...@hp.com:
Hi All,
Me and my fellow friends (CCed) invite the community
On Wed, 2014-03-19 at 12:37 -0700, Devananda van der Veen wrote:
Let me start by saying that I want there to be a constructive discussion
around all this. I've done my best to keep my tone as non-snarky as I could
while still clearly stating my concerns. I've also spent a few hours
reviewing
+1 for performance analysis to understand what needs to be optimised. Metering
should be light-weight.
For those of us running in production, we don't have an option to turn
ceilometer off some of the time. That we are not able to run through the gate
tests hints that there are optimisations
On Thu, 20 Mar 2014 11:51:26 +0100
Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.org wrote:
I still think reverting before release is an option we should
consider. My point is, yes we broke it back in October for people
doing CD (and they might by now have gotten used to it), if we let
this to release
Tim, yep. If you use one db for Ceilometer and Nova then nova's performance
may be affected. I've seen this issue.
Will start profiling ASAP.
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 3:59 PM, Tim Bell tim.b...@cern.ch wrote:
+1 for performance analysis to understand what needs to be optimised.
Metering
On 03/18/2014 07:19 PM, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
Dear Students,
Student application deadline is on Friday, March 21 [1]
Once you finish the application process on the Google GSoC site.
Please reply back to this thread to confirm that all the materials are
ready to review.
thanks,
dims
[1]
On 20/03/14 09:09 +, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
On Wed, 2014-03-19 at 12:37 -0700, Devananda van der Veen wrote:
Let me start by saying that I want there to be a constructive discussion
around all this. I've done my best to keep my tone as non-snarky as I could
while still clearly stating my
On Thu, 2014-03-20 at 12:07 +0100, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Monty Taylor wrote:
On 03/20/2014 01:30 AM, Radcliffe, Mark wrote:
The problem with AGPL is that the scope is very uncertain and the
determination of the consequences are very fact intensive. I was the
chair of the User Committee
On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 7:38 PM, Yuriy Taraday yorik@gmail.com wrote:
I'm aiming at ~100 new lines of code for daemon. Of course I'll use some
batteries included with Python stdlib but they should be safe already.
It should be rather easy to audit them.
Here's my take on this:
- Original Message -
Monty Taylor wrote:
On 03/20/2014 01:30 AM, Radcliffe, Mark wrote:
The problem with AGPL is that the scope is very uncertain and the
determination of the consequences are very fact intensive. I was the
chair of the User Committee in developing the GPLv3 and I
On 03/20/2014 08:36 AM, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
On Thu, 2014-03-20 at 12:07 +0100, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Monty Taylor wrote:
On 03/20/2014 01:30 AM, Radcliffe, Mark wrote:
The problem with AGPL is that the scope is very uncertain and the
determination of the consequences are very fact
On 03/20/2014 01:27 PM, Nadya Privalova wrote:
Tim, yep. If you use one db for Ceilometer and Nova then nova's
performance may be affected.
If I understood it correctly the problem is not the higher load produced
directly by Ceilometer on the database. The problem is that the
Ceilometer compute
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 5:21 AM, Kumar, Vinod (HP Networking)
vinod.kum...@hp.com wrote:
Hi All,
Me and my fellow friends (CCed) invite the community to review OpenStack
Neutron Port Templates Network Policy blueprint submitted recently.
Please review the same and feel free to suggest,
Also, before undertaking large blueprints like this, I'd highly encourage
folks to look
at existing work in the community. The Neutron community has been working on
Group Based Policy since last fall. There was a design summit session in
Hong Kong
around this as well, and we've been meeting weekly
Team,
Here's what i see in the system so far.
Mentors:
ybudupi
blint
boris_42
coroner
cppcabrera
sriramhere
arnaudleg
greghaynes
hughsaunders
julim
ddutta (Organization Administrator)
dims (Organization Administrator)
Projects:
Cross-services Scheduler project. Artem Shepelev Artem Shepelev
We're using a dedicated MongoDB instance for ceilometer and a distinct DB for
each of the Nova cells.
Tim
From: Nadya Privalova [mailto:nprival...@mirantis.com]
Sent: 20 March 2014 13:27
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev]
Wow Yuriy, amazing and fast :-), benchmarks included ;-)
The daemon solution only adds 4.5ms, good work. I'll add some
comments in a while.
Recently I talked with another engineer in Red Hat (working
in ovirt/vdsm), and they have something like this daemon, and they
are using
Hi,
As discussed in the last meeting, i had changed the POC for Quota Management in
Hierarchical Multitenancy setup. Please check the following links
Twiki Page - https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/POC_for_QuotaManagement#API_URLs
Code (diff) -
Hi Yongli,
I'm very glad that you bring this up and relive our discussion on PCI
passthrough and its application on networking. The use case you brought up
is:
user wants a FASTER NIC from INTEL to join a virtual
networking.
By FASTER, I guess that you mean that the user is allowed
On 03/20/2014 12:32 PM, Monty Taylor wrote:
On 03/20/2014 05:31 AM, Miguel Angel Ajo wrote:
On 03/19/2014 10:54 PM, Joe Gordon wrote:
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 9:25 AM, Miguel Angel Ajo majop...@redhat.com
mailto:majop...@redhat.com wrote:
An advance on the changes that it's
Hi y'all!
It's good to be back, eh!
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 11:35 PM, Eugene Nikanorov
enikano...@mirantis.comwrote:
- Active/Passive Failover
- I think this is solved with multiple pools.
The multiple pools support that is coming with L7 rules is to support
content-switching
Let me start by saying that I want there to be a constructive discussion around
all this. I've done my best to keep my tone as non-snarky as I could while
still clearly stating my concerns. I've also spent a few hours reviewing the
current code and docs. Hopefully this contribution will be
I concur. I suspect people/organizations who are doing CD *probably* won't mind
such a change as much as the people who use the versioned releases will mind
backwards-incompatibility. Correct me if I'm wrong, but doing CD requires a
certain willingness to roll with the punches, so to speak,
I agree this is quite an issue but I also think that pretending that
we'll be able to let OpenStack grow with a minimum set of databases,
brokers and web servers is a bit unrealistic. The set of supported
technologies won't be able to fulfill the needs of all the
yet-to-be-discovered
?Hi,
I'm creating a custom panel for horizon. I have developed a table that
displays some information, and I would like to add a 'icon' to each row.
Ideally, I want to be able to specify the URL of a remote image, and have it
displayed using the img tag.
Can this be acheived with filters,
On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 12:58 AM, Carl Baldwin c...@ecbaldwin.net wrote:
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/neutron-agent-exec-performance
I've added info on how we can speedup work with namespaces by setting
namespaces by ourselves using setns() without ip netns exec overhead.
--
Kind
On 03/20/2014 06:15 AM, Sean Dague wrote:
On 03/20/2014 05:49 AM, Nadya Privalova wrote:
Hi all,
First of all, thanks for your suggestions!
To summarize the discussions here:
1. We are not going to install Mongo (because is's wrong ?)
We are not going to install Mongo not from base
Thanks for the input. I too was thinking IP Access Control could be solved
with the firewall service in Neutron. To clarify what I mean check out our
current API docs on this feature
herehttp://docs.rackspace.com/loadbalancers/api/v1.0/clb-devguide/content/Manage_Access_Lists-d1e3187.html.
This is easy to accomplish by creating a custom template for a cell. In your
table, instead of providing a data field for the column, provide a method name,
have that method load a custom HTML template.
Here is an example of this without an image of this method:
On 03/20/2014 11:11 AM, Chuck Thier wrote:
I agree this is quite an issue but I also think that pretending that
we'll be able to let OpenStack grow with a minimum set of databases,
brokers and web servers is a bit unrealistic. The set of supported
technologies won't be able
On 3/19/2014 10:02 AM, Matthew Treinish wrote:
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 09:35:34AM -0500, Matt Riedemann wrote:
On 3/19/2014 2:48 AM, Shao Kai SK Li wrote:
Hello:
I am working on this
patch(https://review.openstack.org/#/c/77524/) to fix bugs about volume
attach failure with keystone
We recently discussed the idea of using gerrit to review blueprint
specifications [1]. There was a lot of support for the idea so we have
proceeded with putting this together before the start of the Juno
development cycle.
We now have a new project set up, openstack/nova-specs. You submit
Yes, those tests are conditionally executed if
https://pypi.python.org/pypi/python-memcached/ is installed and if so,
memcached is assumed to be accessible on localhost. Unfortunately the test
suite doesn't have a sanity check for that following assumption, so the
test failures aren't particularly
Conversation from #openstack-dev starting at 2014-03-20T15:09:49
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/irclogs/%23openstack-dev/%23openstack-dev.2014-03-20.log
On 3/20/2014 10:47 AM, Matt Riedemann wrote:
On 3/19/2014 10:02 AM, Matthew Treinish wrote:
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 09:35:34AM -0500,
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 7:28 PM, Rick Jones rick.jon...@hp.com wrote:
On 03/20/2014 05:41 AM, Yuriy Taraday wrote:
Benchmark included showed on my machine these numbers (average over 100
iterations):
Running 'ip a':
ip a : 4.565ms
Hi,
Anthony Veiga and I did a small bit of whiteboarding this morning to
sketch out what a prefix delegation would look like in the Neutron API.
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Neutron/IPv6/PrefixDelegation
--
Sean M. Collins
___
OpenStack-dev
warm is just an other client, like we can have for the cli. It does
not claim to do what Heat can. It should be useful to prepare some templates
to be reused in different OpenStack environment without using script
shell or python.
When I said standalone client, I mean there is no need to install
The incorporation of AGPLv3 code Into OpenStack Project is a
significant decision
To be clear, Marconi does not incorporate any AGPL code itself; pymongo is
Apache2 licensed.
Concerns over AGPL were raised when Marconi was incubated, and I totally
respect that some folks are not comfortable
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 5:41 PM, Miguel Angel Ajo majop...@redhat.comwrote:
Wow Yuriy, amazing and fast :-), benchmarks included ;-)
The daemon solution only adds 4.5ms, good work. I'll add some comments
in a while.
Recently I talked with another engineer in Red Hat (working
in
On 03/20/2014 11:35 AM, David Kranz wrote:
On 03/20/2014 06:15 AM, Sean Dague wrote:
On 03/20/2014 05:49 AM, Nadya Privalova wrote:
Hi all,
First of all, thanks for your suggestions!
To summarize the discussions here:
1. We are not going to install Mongo (because is's wrong ?)
We are not
On 03/20/2014 09:07 AM, Yuriy Taraday wrote:
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 7:28 PM, Rick Jones rick.jon...@hp.com
mailto:rick.jon...@hp.com wrote:
Interesting result. Which versions of sudo and ip and with how many
interfaces on the system?
Here are the numbers:
% sudo -V
Sudo version
- Active/Passive Failover
- I think this is solved with multiple pools.
The multiple pools support that is coming with L7 rules is to support
content-switching based on L7 HTTP information (URL, headers, etc.). There
is no support today for an active vs. passive pool.
I'm not
On 03/20/2014 12:29 PM, Kurt Griffiths wrote:
The incorporation of AGPLv3 code Into OpenStack Project is a
significant decision
To be clear, Marconi does not incorporate any AGPL code itself; pymongo is
Apache2 licensed.
Concerns over AGPL were raised when Marconi was incubated, and I
Thanks,
That worked perfectly.
I defined a method like this:
def get_image_url(stack):
template_name = 'openwave/stack_catalogue/_icon.html'
context = {stack : stack }
return template.loader.render_to_string(template_name, context)
Stack is my class that has a field called
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 8:23 PM, Rick Jones rick.jon...@hp.com wrote:
On 03/20/2014 09:07 AM, Yuriy Taraday wrote:
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 7:28 PM, Rick Jones rick.jon...@hp.com
mailto:rick.jon...@hp.com wrote:
Interesting result. Which versions of sudo and ip and with how many
On 03/20/2014 12:31 PM, Sean Dague wrote:
On 03/20/2014 11:35 AM, David Kranz wrote:
On 03/20/2014 06:15 AM, Sean Dague wrote:
On 03/20/2014 05:49 AM, Nadya Privalova wrote:
Hi all,
First of all, thanks for your suggestions!
To summarize the discussions here:
1. We are not going to install
On Mar 20, 2014, at 5:52 AM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote:
On 03/20/2014 08:36 AM, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
On Thu, 2014-03-20 at 12:07 +0100, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Monty Taylor wrote:
On 03/20/2014 01:30 AM, Radcliffe, Mark wrote:
The problem with AGPL is that the scope is very uncertain
To be clear, Marconi does not incorporate any AGPL code itself; pymongo is
Apache2 licensed.
Understood, but here's the rub. Someone else is going to want to build on this
(which it the point of this open source project). Whereas 'pymongo' is Apache
licensed, since the copyright holder, MongoDB
Stephen,
I don’t think the active/passive pools feature is referring to the HA of
loadbalancers. This is about the ability to divide the list of members
servicing load-balanced requests into 2 groups: The first one is active and the
second one is passive (or a backup pool). If all the members
The use case from our customers has been mostly for database (MySql) load
balancing. If the master goes down then they want another master/slave on
standby ready to receive traffic. In the simplest case, I think Neutron can
achieve this with 2 pools with 1 node each. If pool #1 goes down then
On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 5:22 AM, Timur Sufiev tsuf...@mirantis.com wrote:
It depends on openstack_dashboard, namely on
openstack_dashboard.settings. So it is fine from Murano's point of
view to have openstack_dashboard published on PyPi. Many thanks for
considering my request :).
We are
Hi
How does the keystone role stuff work in real production deployment? Every
service team considers the user who has role with the name admin as admin.
So basically I can't have a separate admin user for keystone, nova, swift.
Isn't this a security issue? Given a project how to
Right, it could be solved by pool's member weights and appropriate
scheduling algorithm.
Eugene.
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 9:21 PM, Jorge Miramontes
jorge.miramon...@rackspace.com wrote:
The use case from our customers has been mostly for database (MySql)
load balancing. If the master goes
IMHO, I feel like many of the things in the Implementation section should
just be in the
launchpad BP, and not in the git-tracked spec. While I think that the idea of
having
the BP in Gerrit is a great idea, I feel like the details of the
Implementation section
(assignee, etc) will lead to
As a workaround you can use tarball in requirements.txt (or
test-requirements.txt).
Each versions of Horizon/openstack_dashboard is available at
http://tarballs.openstack.org/horizon/.
Each tarball is generated every time corresponding branch or tag is updated.
If you would like to use horizon I-3
Jorge,
Just to clarify, is this a feature to control which client IP addresses can
access the VIP?
Thanks,
Youcef
From: Jorge Miramontes [mailto:jorge.miramon...@rackspace.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2014 8:37 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re:
I'm running a havana install, and during some testing I've managed to
get the system into a state where two instances are up and running but
are reporting a task_state of REBOOTING.
I can see the nova-api logs showing the soft-reboot request. I don't
see a corresponding nova-compute log
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 11:35:15AM +, Malini Kamalambal wrote:
Hello all,
I have been working on adding tests in Tempest for Marconi, for the last few
months.
While there are many amazing people to work with, the process has been more
difficult than I expected.
Couple of
Hi Chris,
Are you in the position to determine whether or not this happens with the
latest master code?
Either way, it definitely looks like a bug.
If you could give more specific reproduction instructions, that would be most
useful.
Best Regards,
Solly Ross
- Original Message -
From:
Aah! Yes-- you are correct. I was thinking a the load balancer level, not
the pool level. (Maybe we can clarify this distinction in the requirements
doc?)
But I would also be surprised if there are load balancers today that don't
intrinsically offer active / backup pool membership as a standard
On 03/20/2014 11:05 AM, Solly Ross wrote:
I concur. I suspect people/organizations who are doing CD *probably* won't mind
such a change as much as the people who use the versioned releases will mind
backwards-incompatibility. Correct me if I'm wrong, but doing CD requires a
certain willingness
Kurt,
Your point is that NoSQL solution may be required for innovative project.
And that is MongoDB. But what if come another amazing project that needs
CouchDB, neo4j, Riak, (put your favorite NoSQL DB here)? It would be in the
same position cause everyone would say hey, we already have NoSQL in
Sorry if my meaning was unclear. I think we should revert as well.
Best Regards,
Solly Ross
- Original Message -
From: David Kranz dkr...@redhat.com
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2014 2:20:42 PM
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Backwards incompatible
On 03/20/2014 12:06 PM, Solly Ross wrote:
Hi Chris,
Are you in the position to determine whether or not this happens with the
latest master code?
Either way, it definitely looks like a bug.
Unfortunately not right now, working towards a deadline.
If you could give more specific reproduction
If we limited Openstack projects to just one database, is that database (e.g.
MySQL) going to be the best storage deployment for that job? Or are there
cases where other technologies such as Redis, MongoDB, Cassandra, CouchDB, etc
make more sense?
Marconi has a pluggable storage driver model
Excerpts from Flavio Percoco's message of 2014-03-19 03:01:19 -0700:
FWIW, I think there's a value on having an sqlalchemy driver. It's
helpful for newcomers, it integrates perfectly with the gate and I
don't want to impose other folks what they should or shouldn't use in
production. Marconi
On 03/20/2014 12:29 PM, Chris Friesen wrote:
The fact that there are no success or error logs in nova-compute.log
makes me wonder if we somehow got stuck in self.driver.reboot().
Also, I'm kind of wondering what would happen if nova-compute was
running reboot_instance() and we rebooted the
Thanks Matt for your response !! It has clarified some of the 'cloudy
areas' ;)
So having only looked at the Marconi ML thread and not the actual TC
meeting
minutes I might be missing the whole picture. But, from what I saw when I
looked
at both a marconi commit and a tempest commit is that
On Thu, 2014-03-20 at 13:50 +, Robert Li (baoli) wrote:
Hi Yongli,
I'm very glad that you bring this up and relive our discussion on PCI
passthrough and its application on networking. The use case you brought up
is:
user wants a FASTER NIC from INTEL to join a virtual
Please review the following blueprints, both are scoped to supporting
multiple sort key and sort directions on the API request when retrieving
volumes and servers.
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/cinder/+spec/cinder-pagination
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/nova-pagination
Note
On Thu, 2014-03-20 at 19:34 +1100, Christopher Yeoh wrote:
On Tue, 18 Mar 2014 19:52:27 +0100
Koderer, Marc m.kode...@telekom.de wrote:
Am I missing something or are these schemas being added now just a
subset of what is being used for negative testing? Why can't we
either add the
I will agree that the TC language is not as strong as it should be (and
really should be clarified, but I don't think that's going to happen
until the release is looking solid). Honestly, though, I think Sahara is
a good example here of the level of that we expect. They have actively
engaged with
-Original Message-
From: Malini Kamalambal [mailto:malini.kamalam...@rackspace.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2014 12:13 PM
'project specific functional testing' in the Marconi context is
treating
Marconi as a complete system, making Marconi API calls verifying the
response -
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 10:49 AM, Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com wrote:
We recently discussed the idea of using gerrit to review blueprint
specifications [1]. There was a lot of support for the idea so we have
proceeded with putting this together before the start of the Juno
development
On 03/20/2014 01:01 PM, David Kranz wrote:
On 03/20/2014 12:31 PM, Sean Dague wrote:
On 03/20/2014 11:35 AM, David Kranz wrote:
On 03/20/2014 06:15 AM, Sean Dague wrote:
On 03/20/2014 05:49 AM, Nadya Privalova wrote:
Hi all,
First of all, thanks for your suggestions!
To summarize the
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 1:19 PM, Rochelle.RochelleGrober
rochelle.gro...@huawei.com wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Malini Kamalambal [mailto:malini.kamalam...@rackspace.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2014 12:13 PM
'project specific functional testing' in the Marconi context
Hi!
I've submitted my proposal to the GSoC site. And my Project Detail Page
will be ready soon. Looking forward to your comments!
Thanks!
Chenchong
Dear Students,
Student application deadline is on Friday, March 21 [1]
Once you finish the application process on the Google GSoC site.
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 3:51 AM, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.orgwrote:
Christopher Yeoh wrote:
The patch was merged in October (just after Icehouse opened) and so has
been used in clouds that do CD for quite a while. After some discussion
on IRC I think we'll end up having to leave
1 - 100 of 135 matches
Mail list logo
