Hi Stephen,
Well, sure, except the user is going to want to know what the IP
> address(es) are for obvious reasons, and expect them to be taken from
> subnet(s) the user specifies. Asking the user to provide a Neutron
> network_id (ie. where we'll attach the L2 interface) isn't definitive here
> b
Hi Brandon,
I, too, have not heard clear and concise reasons why the core team
> members would not like a logical load balancer object, or a load
> balancer object that maps to many vips, which in turn maps to many
> listeners. I've been to every LBaaS meeting for months now I think, and
> I jus
On 05/09/2014 04:37 PM, Samuel Bercovici wrote:
It boils down to two aspects:
1.How common is it for tenant to care about affinity or have more than a
single VIP used in a way that adding an additional (mandatory) construct
makes sense for them to handle?
For example if 99% of users do not care
On Sat, 2014-05-10 at 09:50 -0700, Stephen Balukoff wrote:
>
> Correct me if I'm wrong, but wasn't "the existing API is confusing and
> difficult to use" one of the major complaints with it (as voiced in
> the IRC meeting, say on April 10th in IRC, starting around... I
> dunno... 14:13 GMT)? If
Hi Eugene,
Since this debate has come and gone before, I'd like to thank you for
having the patience to still be debating with us about it. It's
requiring a lot of patience for everyone on both sides of the argument.
A debate like this can be healthy though.
I, too, have not heard clear and conc
Hi Sam,
I do not have access to those statistics. Though, I can say that with
our current networking infrastructure customers that have multiple IPv4
or multiple IPv6 VIPs are in the minority. However, we have received
feature requests on allowing VIPs on our two main networks (public and
private)
On May 10, 2014, at 1:52 AM, Eugene Nikanorov
wrote:
> Hi Carlos,
> I think you had a chance to hear this argument yourself (from several
> different core members: Mark McClain, Salvatore Orlando, Kyle Mestery) on
> those meetings we had in past 2 months.
> I was advocating 'loadbalancer' (in
Hello Mardan,
The following Cinder wiki pages contains the information or links to the
information that you will need to submit a new driver:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Cinder and
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Cinder/how-to-contribute-a-driver
~Kurt
From: Mardan Raghuwanshi [mailto:marda
FWIW 1GB works fine for me on my laptop, I run the master setup manually.
So I'm against increasing RAM requirement, we have better things to spend
that RAM on.
On May 10, 2014 1:37 AM, "Mike Scherbakov" wrote:
> It is not related to RAM or CPU. I run installation on my Mac with 1Gb of
> RAM for
Hi Eugene,
A couple notes of clarification:
On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 2:30 AM, Eugene Nikanorov
wrote:
>
> On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 10:25 PM, Stephen Balukoff
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Eugene,
>>
>> This assumes that 'VIP' is an entity that can contain both an IPv4
>> address and an IPv6 address. This is ho
Hi Clay,
First of all, thanks for the reply.
1. How can I update the eventlet version. I installed swift from source
(git). Pulling the latest code helps?
2. Yes. Recently my clients changed to chunked encoding for transfer.
Are you saying chunked encoding is not supported by swift?
3. Yes, th
Hello All,
I developed cinder drivers for CloudByte's ElastiStor. Now we want to make
our driver as a part of core openstack release, but I am not aware of
openstack commit process.
Please help me...
Thanks,
Mardan
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenS
I'd like to propose the following agenda for cross-project session
"Solum, Murano, Heat: how to handle app lifecycle?":
A number of projects are looking at going up the stack and handle application
workload lifecycle management. This workshop aims at placing them all in the
same room and creating
Hi Stephen,
Some comments on comments on comments:
On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 10:25 PM, Stephen Balukoff wrote:
> Hi Eugene,
>
> This assumes that 'VIP' is an entity that can contain both an IPv4 address
> and an IPv6 address. This is how it is in the API proposal and
> corresponding object model th
It is not related to RAM or CPU. I run installation on my Mac with 1Gb of
RAM for master node, and experience the following:
- yes, it needs time to bootstrap admin node
- As soon as I have message that master node is installed, I immediately
open 10.20.0.2:8000 and try to generate diag s
15 matches
Mail list logo
