[openstack-dev] [Nova][Pci] about nova resize with pci device

2014-05-15 Thread Xiaoding (B)
Hi Stacks I test nova resize with pci device , I select two flavor Flavor_1: cpu 1, mem 1G, pci 1, Flavor_2: cpu 2, mem 2G, Then boot instance_1 with Flavor_1 start at Host_A, Then I resize instance_1 to Flavor_2, I found the instance_1 start at Host_B, and flavor is Flavor_2, with pci The pci

[openstack-dev] [heat]How to get metadata when vm in a network without dhcp?

2014-05-15 Thread xuanlangjian
Hi guys, I'm facing a problem when using heat template, my network has no dhcp. So after vm up, I will manually configure a ip for it. But in this case, vm can't get metadata scripts, and also can't do any configure work. So I'm wondering is there a way to get metadata scripts to work

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] Service scoped role definition

2014-05-15 Thread David Chadwick
In preparation for and input to today's design summit session on Authorisation at 11.50am, I thought it might be beneficial to remind folks of the proposed design that was circulated by me at the end of the long discussion on the format of a scoped role, that was held at the end of last year on

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Updated Object Model?

2014-05-15 Thread Eugene Nikanorov
Hi Craig, Implementation-specific options are not exposed through the API, or otherwise it would be inconsistent, given that we are moving to a flavor-based approach of specifying service requirements where implementation is completely hidden from the user. Thanks, Eugene. On Thu, May 15, 2014

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat]How to get metadata when vm in a network without dhcp?

2014-05-15 Thread Qiming Teng
Please post usage question to openst...@lists.openstack.org, not this development mailing list. As for your case, you may want to check config_drive, which is supported both at nova cli and heat templates. Regards, Qimng On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 05:34:57PM +0800, xuanlangjian wrote: Hi guys,

[openstack-dev] [Neutron] Monitoring agent

2014-05-15 Thread Zang MingJie
Hi All: I want to know is there any way to continuously monitor ports connectivity, and report dead port via snmp trap or whatever. Currently I got neutron-debug utility which can help me checking port status by hand, but it would be better to have an agent to do the job automatically, and also

[openstack-dev] [keystone] [barbican] Protecting user specific secrets in Barbican

2014-05-15 Thread Tiwari, Arvind
Barbcan will be used as secret store (or Key Manager) in Open Stack deployments. That means users can store any kind for secrets (ssh keys , access keys, password .) in Barbican these secrets are not shared secrets. In below scenario it seems secrets are not well protected in Barbican 1.

Re: [openstack-dev] 10:30am today, B203 table 6 for Neutron//Re: Scaling Network Performance for Large Clouds: Thursday May 15th at 10:30-11am in the developer lounge at 3rd floor

2014-05-15 Thread Tina TSOU
Dear Neutron Stackers, A kind reminder: We are setting up a meeting to discuss Scaling Network Performance for Large Clouds. There are already cases from eBay, Yahoo, and Huawei customers. Here is related BP: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/scaling-network-performance The

[openstack-dev] [NFV] New Sub-team and Meeting

2014-05-15 Thread Russell Bryant
It is clear that a number of us have been working independently on NFV related features. It would be beneficial to start doing some coordination in this area. To do that, I think we should form an NFV group with a regular IRC meeting. I'd like to see this group be a collaboration of developers,

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS]LBaaS 1st Session etherpad

2014-05-15 Thread Vijay Venkatachalam
Ok, thanks. So Listeners are indeed created independent of Loadbalancers and then associated to Loadbalancers. -Vijay From: Samuel Bercovici [mailto:samu...@radware.com] Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2014 10:10 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re:

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][NFV] NFV BoF at design summit

2014-05-15 Thread Russell Bryant
On 05/14/2014 05:53 PM, IWAMOTO Toshihiro wrote: At Wed, 14 May 2014 14:40:03 -0700, punal patel wrote: [1 multipart/alternative (7bit)] [1.1 text/plain; UTF-8 (7bit)] Will this be recorded? or can I join webex? There's no official recording facility. You may be able to ask someone

Re: [openstack-dev] [NFV] New Sub-team and Meeting

2014-05-15 Thread balaj...@freescale.com
Hi Russell, Are we going to bring all the NFV efforts happening in multiple projects like FWaaS, Service VM etc under one roof. Just curious to know the objective of this NFV sub-team. Regards, Balaji.P -Original Message- From: Russell Bryant [mailto:rbry...@redhat.com] Sent:

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][NFV] NFV BoF at design summit

2014-05-15 Thread Stephen Wong
Hi Chris, A good number of people involved in Neutron advanced service / group-policy / individual services subteams will be at the Group Policy conference session (at 1:30pm). Is it possible to reschedule this to a different time? Thanks, - Stephen On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 10:06 AM, Chris

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Updated Object Model?

2014-05-15 Thread Vijay Venkatachalam
Hi Stephen: * The LBtoListener object is grayed out because it will need to exist in the database (to allow Listeners to be re-used, solving the IPv4 + IPv6 common use case), but should not be directly addressable via the user API. (This is also the reason it's got no tenant_id.) When you

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][NFV] NFV BoF at design summit

2014-05-15 Thread Alan Kavanagh
+1 can we reschedule to push this forward Chris please? Alan From: Stephen Wong [mailto:s3w...@midokura.com] Sent: May-15-14 10:01 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Cc: iawe...@cisco.com Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][NFV] NFV BoF at design summit Hi

Re: [openstack-dev] [NFV] New Sub-team and Meeting

2014-05-15 Thread Stephen Wong
Hi Russ, Are you in Atlanta? If so, should we find a time to meet at (for example) the Neutron pod area for face to face meeting over the next two days? Thanks, - Stephen On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 6:43 AM, Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com wrote: It is clear that a number of us have been

Re: [openstack-dev] [NFV] New Sub-team and Meeting

2014-05-15 Thread Russell Bryant
On 05/15/2014 09:51 AM, balaj...@freescale.com wrote: Hi Russell, Are we going to bring all the NFV efforts happening in multiple projects like FWaaS, Service VM etc under one roof. Just curious to know the objective of this NFV sub-team. I think if a given effort has enough people and

Re: [openstack-dev] [NFV] New Sub-team and Meeting

2014-05-15 Thread Russell Bryant
On 05/15/2014 09:58 AM, Stephen Wong wrote: Hi Russ, Are you in Atlanta? If so, should we find a time to meet at (for example) the Neutron pod area for face to face meeting over the next two days? There's a BoF today at 1:30 pm.

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Updated Object Model?

2014-05-15 Thread Eugene Nikanorov
Hi Vijay, When you say API is not available, it means this should not be considered like a resource/entity. Correct? But then, there would be API like a bind API, that accepts loadbalancer_id listener_id, which creates this object. And also, there would be an API that will be used

[openstack-dev] [Openstack-dev][Neutron] Port Mirroring Extension in Neutron

2014-05-15 Thread Vinay Yadhav
Hi, I am Vinay, working with Ericsson. I am interested in the following blueprint regarding port mirroring extension in neutron: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/port-mirroring I am close to finishing an implementation for this extension in OVS plugin and would be submitting a

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Meet up time at the summit for a POD; Re: Pluggable IPAM

2014-05-15 Thread Justin Hammond
There were some concerns about the ML2 design meeting and this one. Unless there are objections we intend on keeping the IPAM POD at 11:30. My availability is wide open except for 2:30-4:10 (due to my talk). Please respond if you have concerns, otherwise those who have stated their interest

Re: [openstack-dev] [Murano] Meet Murano developers at Atlanta summit

2014-05-15 Thread Ruslan Kamaldinov
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 1:31 PM, Ruslan Kamaldinov rkamaldi...@mirantis.com wrote: We've seen a lot of interest in Murano at the Atlanta summit. In case if you would like to learn more, please stop by Mirantis booth (1st level) tomorrow (Thursday) from from 3PM to 5PM. Murano developers will

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-dev][Neutron] Port Mirroring Extension in Neutron

2014-05-15 Thread CARVER, PAUL
Port mirroring is definitely a topic that I hear coming from network operations. The netops folks are accustomed to having sniffers all over the place and being able to span switch ports as a first step in network troubleshooting. The concern about how do I span a port is one of the first

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][NFV] NFV BoF at design summit

2014-05-15 Thread Steve Gordon
- Original Message - From: Alan Kavanagh alan.kavan...@ericsson.com To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Cc: iawe...@cisco.com Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2014 10:02:49 AM Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][NFV] NFV BoF

Re: [openstack-dev] [NFV] New Sub-team and Meeting

2014-05-15 Thread Chris Wright
* Russell Bryant (rbry...@redhat.com) wrote: It is clear that a number of us have been working independently on NFV related features. It would be beneficial to start doing some coordination in this area. To do that, I think we should form an NFV group with a regular IRC meeting. I'd like to

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Updated Object Model?

2014-05-15 Thread IWAMOTO Toshihiro
It is pity to see enoumous LBaaS efforts have been largely spinning (in a sense of spinlocks) for a while. At Thu, 15 May 2014 14:31:54 +0400, Eugene Nikanorov wrote: [1 multipart/alternative (7bit)] [1.1 text/plain; UTF-8 (7bit)] Hi Craig, Implementation-specific options are not

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Updated Object Model?

2014-05-15 Thread Vijay Venkatachalam
Thanks for the clarification. Eugene. A tangential point since you brought healthmon and pool. There will be an additional entity called ‘PoolMonitorAssociation’ which results in a many to many relationship between pool and monitors. Right? Now, the model is indicating a pool can have only one

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Updated Object Model?

2014-05-15 Thread Eugene Nikanorov
Hi Iwamoto, I think you may want to talk to Mark MacClain on why we want to move to flavors instead of letting user to chose implementation. Basically the arguments against flavors (flexible mapping) are based on some lack of understanding of cloud operator requirements. Ability to chose provider

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Updated Object Model?

2014-05-15 Thread Eugene Nikanorov
Vijay, Pools-monitors are still many to many, if it's not so on the picture - we'll fix that. I brought this up as an example of how we dealt with m:n via API. Thanks, Eugene. On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 6:43 PM, Vijay Venkatachalam vijay.venkatacha...@citrix.com wrote: Thanks for the

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][NFV] NFV BoF at design summit

2014-05-15 Thread Stephen Wong
+1 for lunch break tomorrow (Friday) - we can still meet at the Neutron pod On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 7:27 AM, Steve Gordon sgor...@redhat.com wrote: - Original Message - From: Alan Kavanagh alan.kavan...@ericsson.com To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][NFV] NFV BoF at design summit

2014-05-15 Thread Chris Wright
* Stephen Wong (s3w...@midokura.com) wrote: A good number of people involved in Neutron advanced service / group-policy / individual services subteams will be at the Group Policy conference session (at 1:30pm). Is it possible to reschedule this to a different time? Urgh, we were looking

[openstack-dev] [oslo] Logging exceptions and Python 3

2014-05-15 Thread Victor Stinner
Hi, I'm trying to define some rules to port OpenStack code to Python 3. I just added a section in the Port Python 2 code to Python 3 about formatting exceptions and the logging module: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Python3#logging_module_and_format_exceptions The problem is that I don't know

[openstack-dev] [oslo] strutils: enhance safe_decode() and safe_encode()

2014-05-15 Thread Victor Stinner
Hi, The functions safe_decode() and safe_encode() have been ported to Python 3, and changed more than once. IMO we can still improve these functions to make them more reliable and easier to use. (1) My first concern is that these functions try to guess user expectation about encodings. They

Re: [openstack-dev] [sahara] Nominate Trevor McKay for sahara-core

2014-05-15 Thread Matthew Farrellee
On 05/12/2014 05:31 PM, Sergey Lukjanov wrote: Hey folks, I'd like to nominate Trevor McKay (tmckay) for sahara-core. He is among the top reviewers of Sahara subprojects. Trevor is working on Sahara full time since summer 2013 and is very familiar with current codebase. His code contributions

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] [barbican] Protecting user specific secrets in Barbican

2014-05-15 Thread Jarret Raim
So let me try to summarize our conversations from yesterday. === Use Case === Assume we have a Domain D which contains a large number of individual users. Each user in the domain creates a public / private key. This key pair is later used to establish authentication to services, some not from

Re: [openstack-dev] [sahara] Nominate Trevor McKay for sahara-core

2014-05-15 Thread John Speidel
+1 Excellent addition. -John On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 2:26 PM, Andrew Lazarev alaza...@mirantis.comwrote: +1 It will be good addition to the core team. Thanks, Andrew. On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 2:31 PM, Sergey Lukjanov slukja...@mirantis.comwrote: Hey folks, I'd like to nominate

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-docs] [Heat][Documentation] Heat template documentation

2014-05-15 Thread Gauvain Pocentek
(Resending to add openstack-dev) Gauvain Pocentek Objectif Libre - Infrastructure et Formations Linux http://www.objectif-libre.com Le 2014-05-15 17:34, Gauvain Pocentek a écrit : Hello, This mail probably mainly concerns the doc team, but I guess that the heat team wants to know what's

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] [barbican] Protecting user specific secrets in Barbican

2014-05-15 Thread Jarret Raim
I just spoke with Dolph and he suggested an option that seems to solve the problem. In Keystone, projects that belong to domains (or other projects as the hierarchy work moves forward) can be marked as Private, which will prevent any role inheritance for users higher in the hierarchy. This seems

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-dev][Neutron] Port Mirroring Extension in Neutron

2014-05-15 Thread Kanzhe Jiang
Hi Vinay, I am interested. You could sign up a slot for a Network POD discussion. Thanks, Kanzhe On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 7:13 AM, Vinay Yadhav vinayyad...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I am Vinay, working with Ericsson. I am interested in the following blueprint regarding port mirroring

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][NFV] NFV BoF at design summit

2014-05-15 Thread Hoban, Adrian
+1 for lunch tomorrow -Original Message- From: Chris Wright [mailto:chr...@sous-sol.org] Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2014 11:06 AM To: Steve Gordon; CARVER, PAUL; Stephen Wong; Alan Kavanagh Cc: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions); iawe...@cisco.com Subject: Re:

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-docs] [Heat][Documentation] Heat template documentation

2014-05-15 Thread Steve Baker
On 15/05/14 11:54, Gauvain Pocentek wrote: (Resending to add openstack-dev) Gauvain Pocentek Objectif Libre - Infrastructure et Formations Linux http://www.objectif-libre.com Le 2014-05-15 17:34, Gauvain Pocentek a écrit : Hello, This mail probably mainly concerns the doc team, but I

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-dev][Neutron] Port Mirroring Extension in Neutron

2014-05-15 Thread Vinay Yadhav
Hi, Cool, I propose today at 2:20 PM near the neutron pod. Can you tell me how do i sign up for it. Cheers, main(i){putchar((5852758((i-1)/2)*8)-!(1i)*'\r')^89main(++i);} On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 12:03 PM, Kanzhe Jiang kanzhe.ji...@bigswitch.comwrote: Hi Vinay, I am interested. You could

[openstack-dev] [Neutron][IPv6] Privacy extension

2014-05-15 Thread Shixiong Shang
Hi, guys: Nice to meet with all of you in the technical session and design session. I mentioned the challenge of privacy extension in the meeting, but would like to hear your opinions of how to address the problem. If you have any comments or suggestions, please let me know. I will create a BP

[openstack-dev] [Neutron] Core API refactoring

2014-05-15 Thread Mandeep Dhami
Hi: I am not at the conference this week, but it is my understanding that there was a proposal for neutron core API refactoring discussed yesterday. I am trying to catch up with that discussion, is there a formal design description or blueprint that I can review? Thanks, Mandeep -

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][NFV] NFV BoF at design summit

2014-05-15 Thread Fawad Khaliq
+1 at lunch tomorrow On May 15, 2014 12:31 PM, Hoban, Adrian adrian.ho...@intel.com wrote: +1 for lunch tomorrow -Original Message- From: Chris Wright [mailto:chr...@sous-sol.org] Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2014 11:06 AM To: Steve Gordon; CARVER, PAUL; Stephen Wong; Alan Kavanagh Cc:

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Core API refactoring

2014-05-15 Thread Fawad Khaliq
Hi Mandeep, You can find discussion/details in the etherpad link[1]. [1] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/refactoring-the-neutron-core Thanks, Fawad Khaliq (m) +1 408.966.2214 On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 9:40 AM, Mandeep Dhami dh...@noironetworks.comwrote: Hi: I am not at the conference this

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-dev][Neutron] Port Mirroring Extension in Neutron

2014-05-15 Thread Ian Wells
There's a sheet down there. There's actually something on at the Neutron pod at that time, but you might as well meet up then and see who's interested (I certainly am). On 15 May 2014 09:31, Vinay Yadhav vinayyad...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Cool, I propose today at 2:20 PM near the neutron pod.

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][IPv6] Privacy extension

2014-05-15 Thread Ian Wells
I was just about to respond to that in the session when we ran out of time. I would vote for simply insisting that VMs run without the privacy extension enabled, and only permitting the expected ipv6 address based on MAC. Its primary purpose is to conceal your MAC address so that your IP address

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][NFV] NFV BoF at design summit

2014-05-15 Thread Chris Wright
* Fawad Khaliq (fa...@plumgrid.com) wrote: +1 at lunch tomorrow On May 15, 2014 12:31 PM, Hoban, Adrian adrian.ho...@intel.com wrote: +1 for lunch tomorrow OK. Let's do lunch tomorow, as Stephen suggested, in the Neutron Pod. I still plan to come today at 1:30pm, and will relay any

[openstack-dev] [Glance] Mid Cycle Meetup Survey

2014-05-15 Thread Mark Washenberger
Hi Folks! Ashwhini has put together a great survey to help us plan our Glance mid cycle meetup. Please fill it out if you think you might be interested in attending! In particular we're trying to figure out sponsorship and location. If you have no location preference, feel free to leave those

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][QoS] Reminder - 2:30 PM tomorrow at the Networking pod

2014-05-15 Thread Collins, Sean
Etherpad link: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/qos-api-network-pod From: Collins, Sean Collins sean_colli...@cable.comcast.commailto:sean_colli...@cable.comcast.com Reply-To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-dev][Neutron] Port Mirroring Extension in Neutron

2014-05-15 Thread Vinay Yadhav
Hi, Ok then we meet up at 2:20 at the pod and see who else is interested and take the discussion from there. See u at the pod at 2:20 then. Cheers, main(i){putchar((5852758((i-1)/2)*8)-!(1i)*'\r')^89main(++i);} On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 1:19 PM, Ian Wells ijw.ubu...@cack.org.uk wrote:

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Core API refactoring

2014-05-15 Thread Mandeep Dhami
Thanks for the link, Fawad. I had actually seen the etherpad, but I was hoping that there was a design document backing it up. Regards, Mandeep On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 10:15 AM, Fawad Khaliq fa...@plumgrid.com wrote: Hi Mandeep, You can find discussion/details in the etherpad link[1]. [1]

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][IPv6] Privacy extension

2014-05-15 Thread Martinx - ジェームズ
Hello! I agree that there is no need for Privacy Extensions in a Cloud environment, since MAC address are fake... No big deal... Nevertheless, I think that should be nice to allow 1 Instance to have more than 1 IPv6 addr, since IPv6 is (almost) virtually unlimited... This way, a VM with, for

[openstack-dev] [Neutron] Pod-area meetup to discuss proposal to allow HV-based network selection

2014-05-15 Thread Manish Godara
Hey folks, I have met several folks at the summit who have come up with their own solutions for large clouds to allow network scaling. Several of the solutions seem to be based on network selection given certain constraints. I would like to discuss some use-cases and some solutions. We

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-dev][Neutron] Port Mirroring Extension in Neutron

2014-05-15 Thread Vinay Yadhav
Hi, The sessions today at the pod is booked completely, we can take it tomorrow, i will have a slot booked and mail back with the time for tomorrow. Cheers, main(i){putchar((5852758((i-1)/2)*8)-!(1i)*'\r')^89main(++i);} On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 1:36 PM, Vinay Yadhav vinayyad...@gmail.com wrote:

[openstack-dev] [neutron] Meaning of qvo, qve, qbr, qr, qg and so on

2014-05-15 Thread Eduard barrera
Hi all, I was wondering what is the meaning of this acronyms... Are they acronyms, right ? Quantum Virtual O?? Quantum B Ridge ? qg ? qve ? What do they mean ? Thanks ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-dev][Neutron] Port Mirroring Extension in Neutron

2014-05-15 Thread Stephen Wong
Hi Vinay, I am interested. Please sign up a slot on Neutron pod for tomorrow (Friday) and announce the timeslot to the ML. Thanks, - Stephen On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 7:13 AM, Vinay Yadhav vinayyad...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I am Vinay, working with Ericsson. I am interested in the

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][NFV] NFV BoF at design summit

2014-05-15 Thread Stephen Wong
Hi Chris, Lunch time is 12:30pm (or couple minutes after that such that folks can grab lunch?)? Thanks, - Stephen On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 10:22 AM, Chris Wright chr...@sous-sol.org wrote: * Fawad Khaliq (fa...@plumgrid.com) wrote: +1 at lunch tomorrow On May 15, 2014 12:31 PM,

[openstack-dev] [barbican] Barbican has completed migration to Pecan

2014-05-15 Thread Chad Lung
The Barbican team is happy to announce that we've migrated to Pecan. We would especially like to thank Ryan Petrello for his work on switching Barbican over to Pecan. Also, thanks to Steve Heyman for his quality assurance work on this. https://review.openstack.org/#/c/89746/ Thanks, Chad Lung

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Pod-area meetup to discuss proposal to allow HV-based network selection

2014-05-15 Thread Michael Dorman
We have some folks interested in this, but want to see the Rackspace Neutron scaling talk (starting now.) Will head down after it. From: Manish Godara mani...@yahoo-inc.commailto:mani...@yahoo-inc.com Reply-To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][NFV] NFV BoF at design summit

2014-05-15 Thread Steve Gordon
- Original Message - From: IWAMOTO Toshihiro iwam...@valinux.co.jp To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2014 5:53:23 PM Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][NFV] NFV BoF at design summit At

[openstack-dev] [Openstack-dev][Neutron] Port Mirroring Extension Discussion in Neutron pod at OpenStack summit

2014-05-15 Thread Vinay Yadhav
Hi, I have booked a slot in neutron pod at OpenStack summit tomorrow to discuss Port Mirroring Extension in Neutron. All interested are welcome to join in the discussion. Time: 9:20 AM - 9:50 AM, Friday (16-05-14) Place: Neutron POD. Cheers,

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-dev][Neutron] Port Mirroring Extension in Neutron

2014-05-15 Thread Vinay Yadhav
Hi, Booked a slot tomorrow at 9:20 AM at the neutron pod. Cheers, main(i){putchar((5852758((i-1)/2)*8)-!(1i)*'\r')^89main(++i);} On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 2:50 PM, Stephen Wong s3w...@midokura.com wrote: Hi Vinay, I am interested. Please sign up a slot on Neutron pod for tomorrow

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][NFV] NFV BoF at design summit

2014-05-15 Thread Stephen Wong
Hi Steve, Agreed. I believe Chris already suggested this meeting will reconvene tomorrow (Friday) at lunchtime - and a number of folks already stated that they will come. Thanks, - Stephen On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 12:29 PM, Steve Gordon sgor...@redhat.com wrote: - Original Message

[openstack-dev] [Mistral][TaskFlow] Integration plan

2014-05-15 Thread Dmitri Zimine
Renat, Joshua, Dmitri and Timur discussed the integration path for Mistral and TaskFlow. Quick summary - guys please correct any mistakes or omissions: Taskflow - Mistral integration plan 1) Mistral: define the set of workflow primitives, define correspondent DSL - Driven by user

[openstack-dev] [Mistral] Cleaning up configuration settings

2014-05-15 Thread W Chan
Currently, the various configurations are registered in ./mistral/config.py. The configurations are registered when mistral.config is referenced. Given the way the code is written, PEP8 throws referenced but not used error if mistral.config is referenced but not called in the module. In various

Re: [openstack-dev] B203 table 6 for Neutron//Re: SDN NBI Core APIs consumed by OpenStack: Wednesday May 14th at 10:30-11am in the developer lounge at 3rd floor

2014-05-15 Thread Tina TSOU
Dear Salvatore, Thank you for your comments. Joe is the best person to explain the trust relationship and his use case. We can describe the APIs here later. https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Neutron/sdnapi Thank you, Tina On May 15, 2014, at 11:45 AM, Salvatore Orlando

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][NFV] NFV BoF at design summit

2014-05-15 Thread Chris Wright
* Stephen Wong (s3w...@midokura.com) wrote: Hi Chris, Lunch time is 12:30pm (or couple minutes after that such that folks can grab lunch?)? Actually shows 12:20-1:20pm on agenda. We can start at 12:30 if you think 10min is sufficient to grab a snack on the go. Sorry, it's the downside

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] Logging exceptions and Python 3

2014-05-15 Thread Igor Kalnitsky
Hi, Is there a reason to log the exception as Unicode on Python 2? Sure, why not? Some exceptions may have unicode message with non-ASCII characters. and we obviously can't cast such exceptions with str() in Python 2.x. The problem is that I don't know what is the best syntax to log

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] Logging exceptions and Python 3

2014-05-15 Thread Christian Berendt
On 05/15/2014 11:20 PM, Igor Kalnitsky wrote: Example: LOG.error(e.message) According to http://legacy.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0352/ the message attribute of BaseException is deprecated since Python 2.6 and was dropped in Python 3.0. Christian. -- Christian Berendt Cloud Computing

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Updated Object Model?

2014-05-15 Thread Brandon Logan
I have concerns about multiple health monitors on the same pool. Is this always going to be the same type of health monitor? There’s also ambiguity in the case where one health monitor fails and another doesn’t. Is it an AND or OR that determines whether the member is down or not? Thanks,

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Updated Object Model?

2014-05-15 Thread Eichberger, German
Hi, I agree with Logan I am wondering if you can share a use case with multiple health monitors. German From: Brandon Logan [mailto:brandon.lo...@rackspace.com] Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2014 5:41 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev]

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-dev][Neutron] Port Mirroring Extension in Neutron

2014-05-15 Thread shihanzhang
Hi Vinay, I am very happy to participate in this discussion! 在 2014-05-16 00:03:35,Kanzhe Jiang kanzhe.ji...@bigswitch.com 写道: Hi Vinay, I am interested. You could sign up a slot for a Network POD discussion. Thanks, Kanzhe On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 7:13 AM, Vinay Yadhav

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-dev][Neutron] Port Mirroring Extension in Neutron

2014-05-15 Thread Anil Rao
See you all there tomorrow. Regards, Anil From: Vinay Yadhav [mailto:vinayyad...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2014 12:51 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-dev][Neutron] Port Mirroring Extension in Neutron Hi,

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] Logging exceptions and Python 3

2014-05-15 Thread Joshua Harlow
Any reason we would want to do this vs using exc_info=True? This leaves it up to the underlying logger to dump the exception, the traceback and whatever else. For example u can do. LOG.warn(Something broke at this point, exc_info=True) From: Igor Kalnitsky

Re: [openstack-dev] [Mistral][TaskFlow] Integration plan

2014-05-15 Thread Joshua Harlow
Looks good to me, We had a good 'meetup' in one of the breakout rooms on the second floor (those rooms are pretty useful!) This does seem like a good step toward making both groups successful and from the discussion I think we have a decent vision of how this can/could work out in the future and

Re: [openstack-dev] Heat SoftwareConfig and SoftwareDevelopment

2014-05-15 Thread Lingxian Kong
2014-05-14 11:51 GMT+08:00 Qiming Teng teng...@linux.vnet.ibm.com: Icehouse version should be okay. You may want to check the readme files and the sample templates. In general, you need hooks specific to your configuration tool (shell script in this case) installed in your VM. ​hi ​Qiming:

Re: [openstack-dev] Heat SoftwareConfig and SoftwareDevelopment

2014-05-15 Thread Thomas Spatzier
Excerpts from Lingxian Kong's message on 15/05/2014 22:51:33: From: Lingxian Kong anlin.k...@gmail.com To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Date: 15/05/2014 22:53 Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] Heat SoftwareConfig and

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Updated Object Model?

2014-05-15 Thread Eugene Nikanorov
Brandon, It's allowed right now just per API. It's up to a backend to decide the status of a node in case some monitors find it dead. Thanks, Eugene. On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 4:41 AM, Brandon Logan brandon.lo...@rackspace.comwrote: I have concerns about multiple health monitors on the same

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS]LBaaS 2nd Session etherpad

2014-05-15 Thread Samuel Bercovici
Hi Everyone, https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/neutron-lbaas-ssl-l7 Feel free to modify and update, please make sure you use your name so we will know who have added the modification. Regards, -Sam. ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list

[openstack-dev] [Ironic] UEFI boot support in ironic deploy drivers

2014-05-15 Thread Faizan Barmawer
Hi Folks, I am currently working on the following blueprints on UEFI boot support for ironic deploy drivers. https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ironic/+spec/uefi-boot-for-ironic https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ironic/+spec/uefi-gpt-support I have updated the proposed changes for in the below