Hi,
This is a reminder about the community meeting in IRC June 02 at 16.00 UTC at
#openstack-meeting.
Agenda:
Review action items
Current status (quickly by team members)
Further plans
Open discussion
You can also find it at https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/MistralAgenda
as well as
Hi,
After restarting keystone with the following command,
*$service openstack-keystone restart*
it is giving a message *Aborting wait for keystone to start*. Could you
please help on what the problem could be?
Thanks,
Tizy
___
OpenStack-dev mailing
On 2014/30/05 22:37, James Polley wrote:
On 30 May 2014, at 8:13 pm, Jaromir Coufal jcou...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi All,
I would like to propose to add Tuskar as a permanent topic to the agenda for
our weekly IRC meetings. It is an official TripleO's project, there happening
quite a lot
Oh, my bad. Sorry, June 5th, of course. Thank you, Lukasz.
On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 7:06 PM, Lukasz Oles lo...@mirantis.com wrote:
june 5th?
On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 4:33 PM, Vladimir Kuklin vkuk...@mirantis.com
wrote:
Guys, we gonna have a more extended design FUEL Library design meeting
Let's follow the standard procedure. Both blueprints lack specification of
implementation details. There also has to be someone willing to implement these
blueprints in near feature.
I'm not opposed to these ideas and I'd really like to see Pecan added during
Juno, but we still need to follow the
After some discussion on IRC we updated blueprint. Now it's available as
review here https://review.openstack.org/#/c/96429/2
Nice looking version is here
http://docs-draft.openstack.org/29/96429/3/check/gate-fuel-specs-docs/d5b32d5/doc/build/html/specs/5.1/access-control-master-node.html
I think API need to be redesigned at some point. There is a blueprint for
this: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/murano/+spec/api-vnext
It seems reasonable to implement new API on new framework at once
Sincerely yours,
Stan Lagun
Principal Software Engineer @ Mirantis
sla...@mirantis.com
On
After restarting keystone with the following command,
$service openstack-keystone restart
it is giving a message Aborting wait for keystone to start. Could you
please help on what the problem could be?
This is not an appropriate topic for the development mailing list,
please open a question
Hello,
Seems to be a good idea, I will take a look at this package which seems to have
a lot of features. The project seems pretty active, and I think it can be a
good idea to dig into this kind of packages.
- Original Message -
From: Veronica A Musso veronica.a.mu...@intel.com
To:
On 05/29/2014 02:06 PM, Bartosz Kupidura wrote:
Hello,
Wiadomość napisana przez Vladimir Kuklin vkuk...@mirantis.com w dniu 29 maj
2014, o godz. 12:09:
may be the problem is that you are using liftetime crm attributes instead of
'reboot' ones. shadow/commit is used by us because we
Hi Angus,
On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 12:56:52AM +, Angus Salkeld wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all
During our Solum meeting it was felt we should make sure that all three
team are on the same page wrt $subject.
I'll describe the use case we are trying to
Bartosz, if you look into what Percona guys are doing - you will see here:
https://github.com/percona/percona-pacemaker-agents/blob/new_pxc_ra/agents/pxc_resource_agent#L516
that they first try to use MySQL and then to get GTID from grastate.dat.
Also, I am wondering if you are using cluster-wide
Vladimir,
Wiadomość napisana przez Vladimir Kuklin vkuk...@mirantis.com w dniu 2 cze
2014, o godz. 13:49:
Bartosz, if you look into what Percona guys are doing - you will see here:
https://github.com/percona/percona-pacemaker-agents/blob/new_pxc_ra/agents/pxc_resource_agent#L516
that they
Hi
I'm getting following error in nova-compute logs when trying to boot
VM from controller node onto compute node ...
Specified RPC version, 3.23, not supported
Please help regarding this.
Thanks
Abhishek Jain
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
Doug, thanks, will track this bug's solution there.
On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 4:17 PM, Doug Hellmann doug.hellm...@dreamhost.com
wrote:
Alex reported the bug against setuptools
(
https://bitbucket.org/pypa/setuptools/issue/213/regression-setuptools-37-installation
)
if you want to track
Alex reported the bug against setuptools
(https://bitbucket.org/pypa/setuptools/issue/213/regression-setuptools-37-installation)
if you want to track progress.
Thanks Doug,
In the meantime, I'm wondering do we have any way of insulating
ourselves against breakages like this?
(along the
The newest setuptools has been removed from the gate mirror - the latest
there now is 3.6 - that *might* in the gate.
We'll see if it'll help. It looks like there is first successful Neutron
job there :)
-- Dina
On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 4:36 PM, Eoghan Glynn egl...@redhat.com wrote:
Alex
Hi crew,
Thank you for starting this topic. I've already performed the research and
started blueprint. Since we changed our blueprint strategy, I made it in
rst format and added it to Gerrit workflow. Feel free to participate.
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/97191/
On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 06:57:04AM -0400, Sean Dague wrote:
Towards the end of the summit there was a discussion about us using a
shared review dashboard to see if a common view by the team would help
accelerate people looking at certain things. I spent some time this
weekend working on a tool
On 4/28/2014 2:58 PM, Dan Smith wrote:
I'd like to propose the ability to support a pluggable trove conductor
manager. Currently the trove conductor manager is hard-coded [1][2] and
thus is always 'trove.conductor.manager.Manager'. I'd like to see this
conductor manager class be pluggable like
Folks,
setuptools 4.0.1 and 3.7.1 have been released - these should fix the issue.
-- Dina
On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 4:45 PM, Dina Belova dbel...@mirantis.com wrote:
The newest setuptools has been removed from the gate mirror - the latest
there now is 3.6 - that *might* in the gate.
We'll see
Hi folks,
Inspired by great work by Sean Dague [1], I have created a review
dashboard for Ironic projects. Main ideas:
Ordering:
0. Viewer's own patches, that have any kind of negative feedback
1. Specs
2. Changes w/o negative feedback, with +2 already
3. Changes that did not have any feedback
On Sat, May 31, 2014 at 09:13:35PM +, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
I'll admit that my Web development expertise is probably almost 20
years stale at this point, so forgive me if this is a silly
question: what is the reasoning against working with the upstreams
who do not yet distribute needed
On 06/02/2014 09:21 AM, Matthew Treinish wrote:
On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 06:57:04AM -0400, Sean Dague wrote:
Towards the end of the summit there was a discussion about us using a
shared review dashboard to see if a common view by the team would help
accelerate people looking at certain things.
Very nicely done, seeing this stuff laid out is really useful. A few
comments:
= Page 3 =
* Nit: The rocker switch for power is a bit odd to me since it looks
like it can be toggled.
* Can you show an example of a non-healthy node? Is it just an X instead
of a check or are there different
Hello Robert,
Nathan Reller has created a blueprint for this effort here:
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/barbican/+spec/kmip-secret-store
The first of several CRs to implement this feature is underway here:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/94710/
I'll defer to others regarding the open KMIP
Thanks for the responses Flavio, Roland.
Some background on why I'm asking: we're using Kafka as the message queue for
a stream processing service we're building, which we're delivering to our
internal customers as a service along with OpenStack. We're considering
building a high throughput
Hi,
It seems there is an issue with the django-angular integration. The problem is
it is not available in the Ubuntu/Fedora packages, and its developers are not
planning to include it.
What can I do in this case? Is there any workaround?
Thanks!
Veronica
--
I think that you would use the PyPI version anyway:
https://pypi.python.org/pypi/django-angular/0.7.2
That's how most of the other Python dependencies work, even in the
distribution packages.
--
Kili - Cloud for Africa: kili.io
Musings: twitter.com/varud https://twitter.com/varud
More Musings:
Hi Everyone,
The Barbican team is hosting our weekly meeting today, Monday June 2nd, at
20:00 UTC in #openstack-meeting-alt
Meeting agenda is available here
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Barbican and everyone is welcomed
to add agenda items.
You can check this link
Hi Deepak-san,
Thank you for your comment. Please see following comments.
1) There is a lof of manual work needed here.. like every time the new host
added.. admin needs to do FC zoning to ensure that LU is visible by the host.
Right. Compared to LVMiSCSI driver, proposed driver are needed
On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 6:57 AM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote:
Towards the end of the summit there was a discussion about us using a
shared review dashboard to see if a common view by the team would help
accelerate people looking at certain things. I spent some time this
weekend working on a
On 05/30/2014 05:29 PM, ebaysf, yvempati wrote:
Hello all,
I am new to the openstack community and I am looking for feedback.
We would like to implement a feature that allows user to pass flat_injected
flag through instance metadata. We would like to enable this feature for
images that
Hi everyone,
The OpenStack Infrastructure (Infra) team is hosting our weekly
meeting on Tuesday June 3rd, at 19:00 UTC in #openstack-meeting
Meeting agenda available here:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/InfraTeamMeeting (anyone is
welcome to to add agenda items)
Everyone interested in
On 06/02/2014 12:17 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 6:57 AM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote:
Towards the end of the summit there was a discussion about us using a
shared review dashboard to see if a common view by the team would help
accelerate people looking at certain
On 05/30/2014 06:58 AM, Jaromir Coufal wrote:
On 2014/30/05 10:00, Thomas Spatzier wrote:
Excerpt from Zane Bitter's message on 29/05/2014 20:57:10:
From: Zane Bitter zbit...@redhat.com
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Date: 29/05/2014 20:59
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO]
Hi all,
Thanks to all participants for visiting the Mistral meeting in
#openstack-meeting today!
The meeting minutes can be found by the following links:
Minutes:
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/mistral_meeting/2014/mistral_meeting.2014-06-02-16.00.html
Minutes (text):
On 06/02/2014 09:21 AM, Matthew Treinish wrote:
snip
The url for this is - http://goo.gl/g4aMjM
(the long url is very long:
Hi,
Thanks for getting back to me.
The current flat_injected flag is set in the hypervisor nova.conf. The
config drive data uses this flag to set the static network configuration.
What I am trying to accomplish is to pass the flat_injected file through
the instance metadata during the boot time
I’ve been in roles where enormous amounts of time were spent on writing specs,
and in roles where specs where non-existent. Like most things, I’ve become
convinced that success lies in moderation between the two extremes.
I think it would make sense for big specs, but I want to be careful we
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 5:45 AM, Day, Phil philip@hp.com wrote:
*From:* Kieran Spear [mailto:kisp...@gmail.com]
*Sent:* 28 May 2014 06:05
*To:* OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
*Subject:* Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] nova default quotas
Hi Joe,
On
We have discussed this a bunch in the past, and the right implementation here
is to put the network configuration in a standard format (json?) in both the
config drive and metadata.
cloud-init can be modified to read from that format and write out a proper
/etc/network/interfaces (or
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 10:46 AM, Matt Riedemann mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
wrote:
On 5/27/2014 4:44 PM, Vishvananda Ishaya wrote:
I’m not sure that this is the right approach. We really have to add the
old extension back for compatibility, so it might be best to simply keep
that
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Then I think the answer to the original question is that this requires
a new spec, unless one already exists?
- -Ben
On 06/02/2014 12:50 PM, Vishvananda Ishaya wrote:
We have discussed this a bunch in the past, and the right
implementation here is
Thanks for today's bug scrub meeting!
The meeting minutes are available by the following links:
Minutes:
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/murano_bug_scrub/2014/murano_bug_scrub.2014-06-02-17.02.html
Minutes (text):
First of all, I think the removal of ³get message[s] by ID² is a great
change, it moves Marconi APIs closer to a typical messaging semantics.
However, I still see the ³list messages² API in the spec
(https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Marconi/specs/api/v1.1#List_Messages). Is
it the plan to leave
Keith,
Have you put HTTP protocol in front of Kafka, or are you using Kafka¹s
native protocol?
Can you also expand a little on your performance requirements? What does
³high throughput² mean to you in terms of the messaging patterns (# of
producers and consumers, # of queues and queue
On 6/2/2014 12:53 PM, Joe Gordon wrote:
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 10:46 AM, Matt Riedemann
mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com mailto:mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
On 5/27/2014 4:44 PM, Vishvananda Ishaya wrote:
I’m not sure that this is the right approach. We really have to
Our experience in backporting leftover bugfixes from MOST 5.0 to 4.1
was not pleasant, primarily because too many backport commits had to
be dealt with at the same time.
We can do better next time if we follow a couple of simple rules:
1) When you create a new bug with High or Critical priority
+1 – Requiring specs for every blueprint is going to make the development
process very cumbersome, and will take us back to waterfall days.
I like how the Marconi team operates now, with design decisions being made in
IRC/ team meetings.
So Spec might become more of an overhead than add value,
Thanks Dmitry.
Can we do #2 using new cool gerrit feature (thanks to Infra team!) ?
- when patch is merged, button Cherry Pick To appears near Review button,
you can easily choose branch by clicking on it?
On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 12:33 PM, Dmitry Borodaenko dborodae...@mirantis.com
wrote:
Our
1. There doesn't seem to be any non-global way to
prevent oauth accesskeys
from expiring. We need delegation to last the (indefinite) lifetime
of the
heat stack, so the delegatation cannot expire.
2. Most (all?) of the oauth interfaces are admin-only. I'm not
clear if
this is a blocker, but
On 06/02/2014 01:05 PM, Sean Dague wrote:
On 06/02/2014 09:21 AM, Matthew Treinish wrote:
snip
The url for this is - http://goo.gl/g4aMjM
(the long url is very long:
+1. After reading through this thread, I think that a blind --retries
N could be harmful and unwise given the current API definition. Users
that need a retry for an SSL error are going to get in to the habit of
adding --retries N to all their calls and they'll end up in trouble
because they
Oslo team,
I've updated the blueprints listed for juno for oslo [1] and
oslo.messaging [2] based on the specs that have been submitted to the
oslo-specs repository [3] and taken a stab at priorities for all of
them. Please look over the list so we can discuss the priorities at
the meeting this
On 06/02/2014 08:20 AM, abhishek jain wrote:
|Hi
|
|
I'm getting following error in nova-compute logs when trying to boot VM from
controller node onto compute node ...
Specified RPC version, 3.23, not supported
Please help regarding this.
It sounds like you're using an older
I think you should add the constraints you have.
Realistically though, not every will be there, and thats fine. There
are some folk we'll need there (e.g. I suspect I'm one of those, but
maybe not!)
My constraints are:
- need to be in Sydney for the 1st-5th, remembering there is an
international
On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 12:29 PM, Matt Riedemann mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
wrote:
On 6/2/2014 12:53 PM, Joe Gordon wrote:
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 10:46 AM, Matt Riedemann
mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com mailto:mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
On 5/27/2014 4:44 PM, Vishvananda Ishaya
On 06/02/2014 09:23 AM, boden wrote:
On 4/28/2014 2:58 PM, Dan Smith wrote:
I'd like to propose the ability to support a pluggable trove conductor
manager. Currently the trove conductor manager is hard-coded [1][2] and
thus is always 'trove.conductor.manager.Manager'. I'd like to see this
Dear all,
Due to our business model and we have various hardware platforms to
support IaaS, so, we need more informations from hypervisors, such as
cpu model name(more specifically, it would look like: Intel E5-2630L )
and memory frequency in order to give our customers more objective value
Hi ya'll!
Comments inline:
On Sun, Jun 1, 2014 at 1:09 PM, Brandon Logan brandon.lo...@rackspace.com
wrote:
Hi Eugene and Sam,
On Sun, 2014-06-01 at 12:07 +0400, Eugene Nikanorov wrote:
Hi Sam,
Eugene, please comment on the migration process bellow.
I think that
On 05/27/2014 06:25 PM, Adrian Otto wrote:
Team,
If you would like to declare a candidacy for PTL for Solum, you may send an
email with the subject [Solum] Solum PTL Candidacy” to this mailing list
declaring your candidacy. Please respond with candidacy notices no later than
00:00 UTC on
On 31/05/14 07:01, Zane Bitter wrote:
On 29/05/14 19:52, Clint Byrum wrote:
update-failure-recovery
===
This is a blueprint I believe Zane is working on to land in Juno. It
will
allow us to retry a failed create or update action. Combined with the
separate
Steve Baker sba...@redhat.com wrote on 06/02/2014 05:37:25 PM:
BTW You missed off another strategy that we have discussed in the
past, and which I think Steve Baker might(?) be working on: retrying
failed calls at the client level.
As part of the client-plugins blueprint I'm planning on
Hi all,
Looking for some help with $subject:
What I'm trying to do is take an existing token (a trust scoped token,
which cannot be use to request another token), and initialize the auth_ref
correctly in a keystoneclient object.
The problem is keystoneclient always requests a new token, via the
Hi Folks - nova is going to have a bug day on Wednesday, 6/4. During that day
we are asking people to take a break from feature work and help fix and/or
review bugs for the day.We hang out on #openstack-bugday
We admire our progress on
Hi all,
In the Neutron weekly meeting today[0], we discussed the ovs-firewall-driver
blueprint[1]. Moving forward, OVS features today will give us 80% of the
iptables security groups behavior. Specifically, OVS lacks connection tracking
so it won’t have a RELATED feature or stateful rules for
Hi,
There's been a few patches like this floating around recently which fix the
incorrect use of 413 as the http error code when a request fails because of
the requestor is out of quota.
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/95671/
Now 413 is definitely wrong, but sometimes the change is made to 400
Excerpts from Steve Baker's message of 2014-06-02 14:37:25 -0700:
On 31/05/14 07:01, Zane Bitter wrote:
On 29/05/14 19:52, Clint Byrum wrote:
update-failure-recovery
===
This is a blueprint I believe Zane is working on to land in Juno. It
will
allow us to retry
2014-06-03 9:21 GMT+09:00 Christopher Yeoh cbky...@gmail.com:
Hi,
There's been a few patches like this floating around recently which fix the
incorrect use of 413 as the http error code when a request fails because of
the requestor is out of quota.
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/95671/
Hi all!
I'd like to draw attention to our list of open bugs:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ironic/+bugs
And ask that, if you have a bug assigned to you, please ensure you're
actively working on it. If you're not, please un-assign yourself from the
bug so it becomes visible / available to others.
On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 7:21 PM, Christopher Yeoh cbky...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
There's been a few patches like this floating around recently which fix
the incorrect use of 413 as the http error code when a request fails
because of the requestor is out of quota.
1) Forklift (tasks status)
2) No-db scheduler discussion (BP ref - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/92128/
)
3) Opens
--
Don Dugger
Censeo Toto nos in Kansa esse decisse. - D. Gale
Ph: 303/443-3786
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
This is to be more inline with the other services we have ie. taskmanager
[1] that you can override if you see fit.
On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 3:55 PM, Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com wrote:
On 06/02/2014 09:23 AM, boden wrote:
On 4/28/2014 2:58 PM, Dan Smith wrote:
I'd like to propose the
Sent that a little too quickly...
This is to be more inline with the other services we have ie. taskmanager
[1] that you can override if you see fit. We decided this was an oversight
from the original creation and should be added.
[1]
Hi Russell
Below are the details...
controller node...
nova --version
2.17.0.122
nova-compute --version
2014.2
compute node.
nova --version
2.17.0.122
nova-compute --version
2013.2.4
Can you help me what i need to change in order to achieve the desired
functioonality.
Thaks
On
On 06/02/2014 05:13 PM, Adam Nelson wrote:
I think that you would use the PyPI version anyway:
https://pypi.python.org/pypi/django-angular/0.7.2
That's how most of the other Python dependencies work, even in the
distribution packages.
That is not true. As all components of OpenStack,
can anyone please review this small fix for ofagent?
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/88224/
it's unfortunate a simple fix like this taking months to be merged.
YAMAMOTO Takashi
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Only one candidate has been proposed for this position, so, due to the
election process we have the MagnetoDB PTL for the Juno cycle.
Congratulations to Ilya Sviridov!
Elections doc updated -
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/MagnetoDB/PTL_Elections_Juno
Thanks.
On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 4:16 PM,
79 matches
Mail list logo
