-Original Message-
From: Andrew Laski [mailto:andrew.la...@rackspace.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2014 10:15 PM
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] question about createbackup API in nova
On 06/04/2014 02:56 AM, Bohai (ricky) wrote:
Hi stackers,
My patch actually does not relies on any not approved feature of a client.
And I have not used any such features in my patch.
Could you let me know which feature you are talking about which you think I
have used, due to which patch would fail in integration testing?
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 6:14
This mailing list is dedicated to openstack development.
I would try your question on https://ask.openstack.org/or the general list
mentioned here: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Mailing_Lists#General_List
Cheers,
Kevin Benton
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 9:11 PM, Sachi Gupta sachi.gu...@tcs.com
hi,
ExaBgp was our first choice because we thought that run something in
library mode would be much more easy to deal with (especially the
exceptions and corner cases) and the code would be much cleaner. But seems
that Ryu BGP also can fit in this requirement. And having the help from a
Ryu
On 04/06/14 14:58 +, Hochmuth, Roland M wrote:
Hi Flavio, In your discussions around a developing Kafka plugin for
Marconi would that be potentially be done by adding a Kafka transport to
oslo.messaging? That is something that I'm very interested in for the
monitoring as a service project
I think maybe we can device a kind of framework so that we can plugin
different BGP speakers.
On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 2:59 PM, YAMAMOTO Takashi yamam...@valinux.co.jp
wrote:
hi,
ExaBgp was our first choice because we thought that run something in
library mode would be much more easy to
Thanks so much for your commits.
Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2014 14:39:30 -0400
From: zbit...@redhat.com
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [heat] Resource action API
On 04/06/14 03:01, yang zhang wrote:
Hi all,
Now heat only supports suspending/resuming a
Hi, Devvananda
I searched a lot about the installation of Ironic, but there is little
metarial about this, there is only devstack with ironic(
http://docs.openstack.org/developer/ironic/dev/dev-quickstart.html)
is there any docs about how to deploy Ironic on production physical node
enviroment?
Hi list,
I'm trying to install openstack ml2 neutron ml2 plugin devstack on 2 nodes with
CentOS.
Basically, I have followed http://devstack.org/guides/multinode-lab.html.
That is really helpful.
Things looks well on controller node.
But, on the compute node, I get many issues.
This is my
Hi,
+1 for the mission statement, but indeed why 2 changes?
- Erno (jokke)
From: Mark Washenberger [mailto:mark.washenber...@markwash.net]
Sent: 05 June 2014 02:04
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List
Subject: [openstack-dev] [Glance] [TC] Program Mission Statement and the Catalog
Hi,
Just a reminder that the weekly Nova API meeting is being held tomorrow
Friday UTC .
We encourage cloud operators and those who use the REST API such as
SDK developers and others who and are interested in the future of the
API to participate.
In other timezones the meeting is at:
EST
On Thu, 2014-05-29 at 15:29 -0400, Anita Kuno wrote:
On 05/28/2014 08:54 AM, Radomir Dopieralski wrote:
Hello,
we plan to finally do the split in this cycle, and I started some
preparations for that. I also started to prepare a detailed plan for the
whole operation, as it seems to be a
great.
I will do more test base on Eugene Nikanorov's modification.
*Thanks,*
2014-06-05 11:01 GMT+08:00 Isaku Yamahata isaku.yamah...@gmail.com:
Wow great.
I think the same applies to gre type driver.
so we should create similar one after vxlan case is resolved.
thanks,
On Thu, Jun
On 06/05/2014 10:59 AM, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
If I'm late to the party and the only one that this is news to, that is
fine. Sixteen additional repos seems like a lot of additional reviews
will be needed.
One slightly odd thing about this is that these repos are managed by
horizon-core, so
On Thu, Jun 05, 2014 at 12:17:07AM +, Randall Burt wrote:
On Jun 4, 2014, at 7:05 PM, Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com
wrote:
Excerpts from Zane Bitter's message of 2014-06-04 16:19:05 -0700:
On 04/06/14 15:58, Vijendar Komalla wrote:
Hi Devs,
I have submitted an WIP review
On 06/03/2014 06:44 PM, Radomir Dopieralski wrote:
We decided that we need to pick the name for the splitting of Horizon
properly. From now up to the next meeting on June 10 we will be
collecting name proposals at:
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/horizon-name-proposals
After that, until
Hi, Stackers
My use case:
under project_id A:
1.create firewall rule default(share=false).
2.create firewall policy default(share=false).
3.attach rule to policy.
4.update policy(share=true)
under project_id B:
1.create firewall with policy(share=true) based on project A.
then create firewall
Hey everyone,
With all those mid-cycle sprints being proposed I found it a bit hard to
track them all (and, like, see if I could just attend one). I tried to
list them all at:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Sprints
I'm pretty sure I missed some (in particular I couldn't find a Nova
mid-cycle
Will this patch of Python fix your problem? *http://bugs.python.org/issue7213
http://bugs.python.org/issue7213*
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 10:41 PM, Qin Zhao chaoc...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Zhu Zhu,
Thank you for reading my diagram! I need to clarify that this problem
does not occur during
Hi.
This is a reminder that we will have a meeting today at 21:00 UTC. The agenda is
at https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Nova#Agenda_for_next_meeting
Cheers,
Michael
--
Rackspace Australia
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
Thierry, you couldn't find the nova midcycle meetup because the final
details haven't been announced yet. I hope to fix that tomorrow.
Cheers,
Michael
On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 7:48 PM, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.org wrote:
Hey everyone,
With all those mid-cycle sprints being proposed I
Excerpts from Steven Hardy's message of 2014-06-05 02:23:40 -0700:
On Thu, Jun 05, 2014 at 12:17:07AM +, Randall Burt wrote:
On Jun 4, 2014, at 7:05 PM, Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com
wrote:
Excerpts from Zane Bitter's message of 2014-06-04 16:19:05 -0700:
On 04/06/14 15:58,
I booked through our company travel and got a comparable rate ($111 or $114, I
can’t recall the exact price).
Regards,
PCM (Paul Michali)
MAIL …..…. p...@cisco.com
IRC ……..… pcm_ (irc.freenode.com)
TW ………... @pmichali
GPG Key … 4525ECC253E31A83
Fingerprint .. 307A 96BB 1A4C D2C7 931D 8D2D 4525
Hi, Stackers,
Use case description:
Firewal is not working when setting the destination-ip-address as VM's
floating ip
Steps to Reproduce:
1. create one network and attached it to the newly created router
2. Create VMs on the above network
3. create security group rule for icmp
4. create an
Hi,
When the router receives packets from the external network, iptables does
sequentially:
1) NAT PREROUTING table: translate floatingip to fixed ip
2) FILTER FORWARD table: apply FW rules ... on fixed ips because
floatingip has been translated to fixed ip
So disabling the ping to the
Hi, All:
In deploying with devstack and Ironic+Nova, we set:
compute_driver = nova.virt.ironic.IronicDriver
This means we can no longer use nova to boot VMs.
Is there a way to manage both ironic bare metal nodes and kvm VMs in
Nova ?
I followed this Link:
Hi, All:
Is ironic support EXSI when boot a bare metal ? If we can, how to
make vmware EXSI ami bare metal image ?
*Best Regards！*
*Chao Yan--**My twitter：Andy Yan @yanchao727
https://twitter.com/yanchao727*
*My Weibo：http://weibo.com/herewearenow
Sorry, it was ESXI.
*Best Regards！*
*Chao Yan--**My twitter：Andy Yan @yanchao727
https://twitter.com/yanchao727*
*My Weibo：http://weibo.com/herewearenow
http://weibo.com/herewearenow--*
2014-06-05 19:39 GMT+08:00 严超 yanchao...@gmail.com:
Hi, All:
Is ironic
You may all have noticed things are really backed up in the gate right
now, and you would be correct. (Top of gate is about 30 hrs, but if you
do the math on ingress / egress rates the gate is probably really double
that in transit time right now).
We've hit another threshold where there are so
Hi Brandon, thanks for your reply. Your explanation makes total sense to me.
So, let's see what the consensus is. :)
Regards and have a nice day!
Andres
-Original Message-
From: Brandon Logan [mailto:brandon.lo...@rackspace.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2014 6:28 PM
To:
On Thu, 2014-06-05 at 11:19 +0200, Radomir Dopieralski wrote:
On 06/05/2014 10:59 AM, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
If I'm late to the party and the only one that this is news to, that is
fine. Sixteen additional repos seems like a lot of additional reviews
will be needed.
One slightly odd
All patches are now approved, but stuck in gate, so, the 2014.1.1
release for Sahara will be right after all changes merged into the
stable/icehouse branch.
On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 2:30 PM, Sergey Lukjanov slukja...@mirantis.com wrote:
Okay, it makes sense, I've updated the etherpad -
I've submitted a patch that copies the compute http response validation
structure for the 'cinder list' request.
https://review.openstack.org/96440
I'm having trouble getting it through the gate, but input from the
cinder group about whether this is useful work that I should persist
with
This behavior of os.pipe() has changed in Python 3.x so it won't be an
issue on newer Python (if only it was accessible for us).
From the looks of it you can mitigate the problem by running libguestfs
requests in a separate process (multiprocessing.managers comes to mind).
This way the only
Xurong,
Firewall is colocated with router. You need to create a router, then the
firewall state will be updated.
Gary
On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 2:48 AM, Xurong Yang ido...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, Stackers
My use case:
under project_id A:
1.create firewall rule default(share=false).
2.create
-Original Message-
From: Jay Pipes [mailto:jaypi...@gmail.com]
Sent: 04 June 2014 19:23
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Proposal: Move CPU and memory
allocation ratio out of scheduler
On 06/04/2014 11:56 AM, Day, Phil wrote:
Hi Jay,
Hi Chao,
The ironic ssh driver does support vmware. See
https://github.com/openstack/ironic/blob/master/ironic/drivers/modules/ssh.py#L69-L89.
Have you seen the Triple-O tools, mainly Disk Image Builder (
https://github.com/openstack/diskimage-builder). This is how I build images
I use for
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 4:27 PM, Brandon Logan
brandon.lo...@rackspace.com wrote:
Hi Andres,
I've assumed (and we know how assumptions work) that the deprecation
would take place in Juno and after a cyle or two it would totally be
removed from the code. Even if #1 is the way to go, the old
Hi, fuelers
We had a meeting today to discuss how we gonna meet all the requirements
for OpenStack patching (
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/fuel/+spec/patch-openstack) and FUEL
Upgrade blueprints.
These are the main points:
1. We need strict EOS and EOL rules to decide how many maintenance
It would be ideal if folks could use the room block I reserved when
booking, if their company policy allows it. I've gotten word from the
hotel they may release the block if more people don't use it, just
FYI.
On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 5:46 AM, Paul Michali (pcm) p...@cisco.com wrote:
I booked
Hello everyone,
Keystone started emitting notifications [1] for users and tenants being created
/ updated /
deleted during the Havana cycle. This was in response to bug [2], the fact that
OpenStack
doesn't clean up after itself when tenants are deleted. Currently, Keystone
does not emit
these
On a compute manager that is still running the old version of the code
(i.e using the previous object version), if a method that hasn’t yet
been converted to objects gets a dict created from the new version of
the object (e.g. rescue, get_console_output), then object_compat()
decorator will
Hi, Thanks for reading my bug! I think this patch can not fix this problem
now, because pipe2() requires Python 3.3.
On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 6:17 PM, laserjetyang laserjety...@gmail.com wrote:
Will this patch of Python fix your problem?
*http://bugs.python.org/issue7213
On 5 June 2014 16:27, Vladimir Kuklin vkuk...@mirantis.com wrote:
1. We need strict EOS and EOL rules to decide how many maintenance
releases there will be for each series or our QA team and infrastructure
will not ever be available to digest it.
Agreed. Would it not be prudent to keep with
Hey folks,
as we agreed on weekly irc meeting two weeks ago, we are going to have
a specs repo pilot for juno-2. So, I'm requesting review for the
initial setup of the sahara-specs project:
https://review.openstack.org/#/q/sahara-specs,n,z
I hope to have initial stuff landed this week and start
Hi Isaku,
In order to make possible to European audience to join ServiceVM meetings,
could you please to move it 2-3 hours later (7-8AM UTC)?
Thank you very much,
Dmitry
On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 10:00 AM, Isaku Yamahata isaku.yamah...@gmail.com
wrote:
Here is the meeting minutes of the meeting.
On 5 June 2014 16:46, Assaf Muller amul...@redhat.com wrote:
Keystone started emitting notifications [1] for users and tenants being
created / updated /
deleted during the Havana cycle. This was in response to bug [2], the fact
that OpenStack
doesn't clean up after itself when tenants are
HI Guys,
It was gr8 to find your interest in solving the nested stack resource
listing.
Lets move ahead by finishing any discussions left over the BP and getting
an approval on It.
Till now what makes sense to me are :
a) an additional flag in the client call --nested (randall)
b) A flattened
We've started to talk about the interactions between transport
clients, service clients, and state. I've noticed we're not on the
same page so I wanted to start a dialog. Here's my starting point...
A Transport Client is about transporting data. It sends and receives data.
A Service Client
Hi developers,
If you have a chance it would be great to hear any feedback.
I opened a new ticket about admin_{user,tenant_name,
password}:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/trove/+bug/1299332
In this ticket, I suggest following changes in api-paste.ini:
+admin_tenant_name = %SERVICE_TENANT_NAME%
Hi Yuriy,
Thanks for reading my bug! You are right. Python 3.3 or 3.4 should not
have this issue, since they have can secure the file descriptor. Before
OpenStack move to Python 3, we may still need a solution. Calling
libguestfs in a separate process seems to be a way. This way, Nova code can
Thanks, Kyle. Great.
-Original Message-
From: Kyle Mestery [mailto:mest...@noironetworks.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2014 11:27 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Implementing new LBaaS API
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at
Hi folks,
We've just started an investigation of spark EDP for Sahara. Please
visit the etherpad and share your insights. Spark experts especially
welcome!
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/sahara_spark_edp
There are some design/roadmap decisions we need to make -- how are we
going to do
Please take a look at
https://docs.python.org/2.7/library/multiprocessing.html#managers -
everything is already implemented there.
All you need is to start one manager that would serve all your requests to
libguestfs. The implementation in stdlib will provide you with all
exceptions and return
Carl,
In the L3 High availability Blue Print I want to make following observation...
1. Just before Active going down if there was fragmented packet getting
reassembling how to recover it ?
If that packet is related App, App will try to resend those packet so that it
will get
I just learned that some projects are thinking about having the specs process
be the channel for submitting new feature ideas, rather than registering
blueprints. I must admit, that would be kind of nice because it would provide
some much-needed structure around the triaging process.
I wonder
I completely agree with you regarding separation of concerns.
I also agree with your definitions: a transport client is for managing HTTP
transactions, a service client contains all the domain logic for an API service
(Swift, Nova, etc.). A service knows nothing about HTTP, a transport client
Just adding openstack-dev to the CC for now :).
- Original Message -
From: ITAI MENDELSOHN (ITAI) itai.mendels...@alcatel-lucent.com
Subject: Re: NFV in OpenStack use cases and context
Can we look at them one by one?
Use case 1 - It's pure IaaS
Use case 2 - Virtual network
On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 1:43 AM, Kuvaja, Erno kuv...@hp.com wrote:
Hi,
+1 for the mission statement, but indeed why 2 changes?
I thought perhaps this way is more explicit. First we're adopting a
straightforward mission statement which has been lacking for some time.
Next we're proposing a
Yamamoto
Cool! OK, I'll make ryu based bgpspeaker as ref impl for my bp.
Yong
Ya, we have already decided to have the driver architecture.
IMO, this discussion is for reference impl.
2014-06-05 0:24 GMT-07:00 Yongsheng Gong gong...@unitedstack.com:
I think maybe we can device a kind of
Some recent reviews have started to include the use of the private
keyword for methods and talk of using final on classes. I don't think
we have consistent agreement on how we should do this.
My take is that we should not use private or final unless we can
articulate the design decision to
My opinion is that we create a *new* transport client instance for every
service client, not re-use existing instances. What’s your take on this?
I'm not in agreement and here is why (with a use case).
A transport client is concerned with transporting only. Whether the same
one is used for each
Hey, sorry for the slow follow. I have to put some finishing touches on a spec
and submit that for review. I'll reply to the list with the link later today.
Hope to have an initial patch up as well in the next day or so.
On Jun 5, 2014, at 10:03 AM, Nilakhya Chatterjee
After watch the documentation and the code of *exabgp* and *Ryu*, I find
the *Ryu* speaker much more easy to integrate and pythonic than *exabgp*. I
will use it as well as reference implementation in the Dynamic Routing bp.
Regards,
On 5 June 2014 18:23, Nachi Ueno na...@ntti3.com wrote:
I am not sure when Barbican would be stable/ready. As an interim solution,
what do you guys think about having a config option to enable/disable
parameter encryption (along with my current implementation)?
On 6/5/14 4:23 AM, Steven Hardy sha...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 05, 2014 at
Carl,
I haven't been able to try this yet as it requires us to run a pretty
big scale
test.
But to try to summarize the current feeling on this thread... the
retry logic is
being put into the neutronclient already (via
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/71464/), it's just that it's not
Hi everyone,
I would like to propose a change to allow/simplify dhcp agent manager
customization (like the l3-agent-consolidation spec) and i would like
the community feedback.
Just to precise my context, I deploy OpenStack for small specific business
use cases and i often customize it because
There is documentation available here:
http://docs.openstack.org/developer/ironic/deploy/install-guide.html
On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 1:25 AM, Jander lu lhcxx0...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, Devvananda
I searched a lot about the installation of Ironic, but there is little
metarial about this, there
ChaoYan,
Are you asking about using vmware as a test platform for developing
Ironic, or as a platform on which to run a production workload managed
by Ironic? I do not understand your question -- why would you use
Ironic to manage a VMWare cluster, when there is a separate Nova
driver
The best thing to do with the code is push up a gerrit review! No need
to be shy, and you're very welcome to push up code before the
blueprint is in, it just won't get merged.
I'm very interested in this code.
On 3 June 2014 09:06, Philipp Marek philipp.ma...@linbit.com wrote:
Hi everybody,
Hi Dan,
On a compute manager that is still running the old version of the code
(i.e using the previous object version), if a method that hasn't yet
been converted to objects gets a dict created from the new version of
the object (e.g. rescue, get_console_output), then object_compat()
Hi Folks
We are currently working on the logistic to organize the Glance mid-cycle
meetup.
What we know so far:
- it will happen in California, USA (either in Palo Alto or San Francisco),
- it will be a 3 days event in the week Jul 28th - Aug 1st (either Monday to
Wednesday or Tuesday to
Thanks everyone who have joined Sahara meeting.
Here are the logs from the meeting:
Minutes:
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/sahara/2014/sahara.2014-06-05-18.02.html
Log:
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/sahara/2014/sahara.2014-06-05-18.02.log.html
--
Sincerely yours,
Sergey
Hi Yuriy,
I read multiprocessing source code just now. Now I feel it may not solve
this problem very easily. For example, let us assume that we will use the
proxy object in Manager's process to call libguestfs. In manager.py, I see
it needs to create a pipe, before fork the child process. The
I have submitted a new/expanded spec for this feature:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/98219/. I hope to start some WiP patches this
afternoon/tomorrow morning. Spec reviews and input most welcome.
On Jun 5, 2014, at 11:35 AM, Randall Burt randall.b...@rackspace.com wrote:
Hey, sorry for the
On 05/06/14 13:07, Sean Dague wrote:
You may all have noticed things are really backed up in the gate right
now, and you would be correct. (Top of gate is about 30 hrs, but if you
do the math on ingress / egress rates the gate is probably really double
that in transit time right now).
We've
I have seen the Ryu team is involved and responsive to the community.
That goes a long way to support it as the reference implementation for
BPG speaking in Neutron. Thank you for your support. I'll look
forward to the API and documentation refinement
Let's be sure to document any work that
On 06/05/2014 03:59 PM, Derek Higgins wrote:
On 05/06/14 13:07, Sean Dague wrote:
You may all have noticed things are really backed up in the gate right
now, and you would be correct. (Top of gate is about 30 hrs, but if you
do the math on ingress / egress rates the gate is probably really
On 06/05/2014 03:59 PM, Derek Higgins wrote:
On 05/06/14 13:07, Sean Dague wrote:
You may all have noticed things are really backed up in the gate right
now, and you would be correct. (Top of gate is about 30 hrs, but if you
do the math on ingress / egress rates the gate is probably really
Dear all,
I am trying to use neo4j graph database instead of mysql for my keystone
would you please help with any documentation or ideas how I need to write
the driver.
Thanks Reagrds,
Tahmina
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
On 06/05/2014 05:25 PM, Tahmina Ahmed wrote:
Dear all,
I am trying to use neo4j graph database instead of mysql for my
keystone would you please help with any documentation or ideas how I
need to write the driver.
No clue about Graph Databases myself. You should pick one backend,
On 05/06/14 03:32, yang zhang wrote:
Thanks so much for your commits.
Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2014 14:39:30 -0400
From: zbit...@redhat.com
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [heat] Resource action API
On 04/06/14 03:01, yang zhang wrote:
Hi all,
Now
On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 7:07 AM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote:
You may all have noticed things are really backed up in the gate right
now, and you would be correct. (Top of gate is about 30 hrs, but if you
do the math on ingress / egress rates the gate is probably really double
that in
I've submitted the spec (finally) and will work on some initial patches this
afternoon/tomorrow. Please provide any feedback and thanks!
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/98219
On Jun 5, 2014, at 11:35 AM, Randall Burt randall.b...@rackspace.com wrote:
Hey, sorry for the slow follow. I have to
Is it possible to make the depth of patches running tests in the gate very
shallow during this high-probability of failure time? e.g. Allow only the
top 4 to run tests and put the rest in the 'queued' state. Otherwise the
already elevated probability of a patch failing is exacerbated by the fact
On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 3:29 PM, Kevin Benton blak...@gmail.com wrote:
Is it possible to make the depth of patches running tests in the gate very
shallow during this high-probability of failure time? e.g. Allow only the
top 4 to run tests and put the rest in the 'queued' state. Otherwise the
On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 3:05 PM, Kyle Mestery mest...@noironetworks.com
wrote:
On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 7:07 AM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote:
You may all have noticed things are really backed up in the gate right
now, and you would be correct. (Top of gate is about 30 hrs, but if you
do
On 05/06/14 12:03, Kurt Griffiths wrote:
I just learned that some projects are thinking about having the specs
process be the channel for submitting new feature ideas, rather than
registering blueprints. I must admit, that would be kind of nice because
it would provide some much-needed structure
Quick update for those who are following along but may not be on IRC right now.
The gate (not just ours -- the gate for all of openstack, which Ironic
is a part of) is having issues right now. See Sean's email for details
on that, and what you can do to help
Hi!
Nova will hold its Juno mid cycle meetup between July 28 and 30, at an
Intel campus in Beaverton, OR (near Portland). There is a wiki page
with more details here:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Sprints/BeavertonJunoSprint
I'll update that wiki page as we nail down more details. There's
Hi, thank you for you help !
I was asking about a platform on which to run a production workload managed
by Ironic.
Yes, there is a separate Nova driver specifically designed for managing
vmware.
But can we deploy a bare metal into VMWare ESXI?
Or can we use vmware driver and at the same time ,
FYI for all,
I have posted http://review.openstack.org/98201 in an attempt to at least
give *some* warning to developers that a change to one of the public
methods on classes we derive from may have consequences to Ironic.
I have WIP'd it until 97757 lands.
On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 7:51 PM,
Oh cool. I didn't realize it was deliberately limited already. I had
assumed it was just hitting the resource limits for that queue.
So it looks like it's around 20 now. However, I would argue that shortening
it more would help get patches through the gate.
For the sake of discussion, let's
On 2014-06-05 19:50:30 -0700 (-0700), Kevin Benton wrote:
[...]
At a queue size of 20 and an 80% success rate. The patch in
position 20 only has a ~44% chance of getting merged. However,
with a queue size of 4, the patch in position 4 has a ~71% chance
of getting merged.
[...]
Your theory
hi chao
I have met the same problem, I read this article
http://www.mirantis.com/blog/baremetal-provisioning-multi-tenancy-placement-control-isolation/
2014-06-05 19:26 GMT+08:00 严超 yanchao...@gmail.com:
Hi, All:
In deploying with devstack and Ironic+Nova, we set:
use host aggregates to differentiate the nova-compute services configured
to use different hypervisor drivers (eg, nova.virt.libvirt vs nova.virt.
ironic).
2014-06-06 11:40 GMT+08:00 Jander lu lhcxx0...@gmail.com:
hi chao
I have met the same problem, I read this article
Hi All,
Can anyone help to review this patch
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/96679/ and provide me your comments?
thanks a lot!
--
Best regard,
David Geng
Hi, Jander:
Thank you very much .
Does this work after you follow these steps ?
*Best Regards！*
*Chao Yan--**My twitter：Andy Yan @yanchao727
https://twitter.com/yanchao727*
*My Weibo：http://weibo.com/herewearenow
http://weibo.com/herewearenow--*
2014-06-06 11:40
Hi Dmitry. Thanks for your interest.
What's your time zone? In fact we have already many time zones.
http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2014-March/030405.html
If desirable, we could think about rotating timezones.
Do you have specific items to discuss?
We could also arrange
Hi, Gary
Thanks for your response, i have created router, the fact is that
firewall rules don't update share status when updating the corresponding
firewall policy share=true. so create firewall under another project and
thus fail.
so i think it's a bug.
what do you think?
cheers,
Xurong
1 - 100 of 105 matches
Mail list logo
