Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Improvements to current reviews

2014-08-10 Thread Avishay Balderman
I think you should update the current reviews (new patch set, not additional review.) +1 I like those changes: +2 -Original Message- From: Doug Wiegley [] Sent: Sunday, August 10, 2014 12:51 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Improvements to current reviews

2014-08-10 Thread Vijay Venkatachalam
Thanks Brandon for constant improvisation. I agree with Doug. Please update current one. We already hv more number of reviews :-). It will be difficult to manage if we add more. Thanks, Vijay Sent using CloudMagic On Sun, Aug 10, 2014 at 3:23 AM, Doug Wiegley

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Improvements to current reviews

2014-08-10 Thread Gary Kotton
Hi, I took a look at and had one minor issue which I think can be addressed. Prior to approving we need to understand what the state of the V2 API will be. Thanks Gary From: Vijay Venkatachalam

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo.db]A proposal for DB read/write separation

2014-08-10 Thread Amrith Kumar
Li Ma, Mike [Wilson | Bayer], and Roman Podoliaka, A similar topic came up in Atlanta at a database panel I participated in. Jay Pipes had organized it as part of the ops track and Peter Boros (of Percona) and I were on the panel. The issue of what to do about the database under OpenStack

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo.db]A proposal for DB read/write separation

2014-08-10 Thread Mike Bayer
On Aug 10, 2014, at 9:59 AM, Amrith Kumar wrote: To Mike Bayer’s point about data distribution and transaction management; yes, we handle all the details relating to handling data consistency and providing atomic transactions during Insert/Update/Delete operations.

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo.db]A proposal for DB read/write separation

2014-08-10 Thread Li Ma
Thanks for all the detailed analysis, Mike W, Mike B, and Roman. For a production-ready database system, replication is a must I think. So, the questions are which replication mode is suitable for OpenStack and which way is suitable for OpenStack to improve performance and scalability of DB

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo.db]A proposal for DB read/write separation

2014-08-10 Thread Mike Bayer
On Aug 10, 2014, at 11:17 AM, Li Ma wrote: How about Galera multi-master cluster? As Mike Bayer said, it is virtually synchronous by default. It is still possible that outdated rows are queried that make results not stable. not sure if I said that :). I know

[openstack-dev] Failed to create a stack with heat (SoftwareDeployment resource is always in progress)

2014-08-10 Thread david ferahi
Hi guys, I 'm trying to create a simple stack with heat. The template contains SoftwareConfig, SoftwareDeployment and a single server resources. The problem is that the SoftwareDeployment resource is always in progress ! After waiting for more than an hour the stack deployment failed and I got

[openstack-dev] API Reference page - proposed change

2014-08-10 Thread Anne Gentle
Hi all, I want to get more eyes on a design change being proposed for the API Reference Listing page, To see the new output, look at this screenshot:

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO][heat] a small experiment with Ansible in TripleO

2014-08-10 Thread Steve Baker
On 02/08/14 04:07, Allison Randal wrote: A few of us have been independently experimenting with Ansible as a backend for TripleO, and have just decided to try experimenting together. I've chatted with Robert, and he says that TripleO was always intended to have pluggable backends (CM layer),

[openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS][Tempest] LBaaS API Tempest testing status update

2014-08-10 Thread Miguel Lavalle
Hi, I have concluded the api testing of LBaaS v2. All the operations on all the resources pass the api test. The test passes both with JSON and XML interfaces. I now will move on to scenario testing The extensions to the neutron clients in tempest are verified to work and good to merge. Please

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] fair standards for all hypervisor drivers

2014-08-10 Thread Michael Still
On Sun, Aug 10, 2014 at 2:33 AM, Jeremy Stanley wrote: On 2014-08-08 09:06:29 -0400 (-0400), Russell Bryant wrote: [...] We've seen several times that building and maintaining 3rd party CI is a *lot* of work. Building and maintaining *any* CI is a *lot* of work, not the

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] The future of the integrated release

2014-08-10 Thread Michael Still
On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 7:06 PM, Thierry Carrez wrote: Michael Still wrote: [...] I think an implied side effect of the runway system is that nova-drivers would -2 blueprint reviews which were not occupying a slot. (If we start doing more -2's I think we will need to

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] oslo.concurrency repo review

2014-08-10 Thread Joshua Harlow
One question from me: Will there be later fixes to remove oslo.config dependency/usage from oslo.concurrency? I still don't understand how oslo.concurrency can be used as a library with the configuration being set in a static manner via oslo.config (let's use the example of `lock_path` @

[openstack-dev] [OpenStack][InstanceGroup] metadetails and metadata in

2014-08-10 Thread Jay Lau
Hi, Does anyone know why in, why do we have the following logic for transferring metadetails to metadata? Why not transfer metadata directly from client? -- Thanks, Jay

Re: [openstack-dev] ceilometer] [ft] Improving ceil.objectstore.swift_middleware

2014-08-10 Thread Osanai, Hisashi
On Friday, August 08, 2014 9:20 PM, Chris Dent wrote: These may not be directly what you want, but are something worth tracking as you explore and think. Thank you for your help. I will brush up my thought (shift to pollster) with the fixes which you pointed out. Thanks again! Hisashi

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack][InstanceGroup] metadetails and metadata in

2014-08-10 Thread Jay Lau
I was asking this because I got a -2 for , just want to know why this new term metadetails was invented when we already have details, metadata, system_metadata, instance_metadata, and properties (on images and volumes). Thanks! 2014-08-11 10:09 GMT+08:00 Jay

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Neutron][Technical Committee] nova-network - Neutron. Throwing a wrench in the Neutron gap analysis

2014-08-10 Thread Tom Fifield
On 09/08/14 05:09, Russell Bryant wrote: On 08/06/2014 01:41 PM, Jay Pipes wrote: On 08/06/2014 01:40 AM, Tom Fifield wrote: On 06/08/14 13:30, Robert Collins wrote: On 6 August 2014 17:27, Tom Fifield wrote: On 06/08/14 13:24, Robert Collins wrote: What happened to

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo.db]A proposal for DB read/write separation

2014-08-10 Thread Li Ma
not sure if I said that :). I know extremely little about galera. Hi Mike Bayer, I'm so sorry I mistake you from Mike Wilson in the last post. :-) Also, say sorry to Mike Wilson. I’d totally guess that Galera would need to first have SELECTs come from a slave node, then the moment it sees

Re: [openstack-dev] Retrigger turbo-hipster

2014-08-10 Thread Joshua Hesketh
Hi John, Sorry for the slow reply*. We ran into some trouble with our CI system after an upgrade to nova's requirements broke our system. Everything is back up and running now and we've caught up on missed jobs (including your recheck). My apologies for the hassle. Let me know if you have