[openstack-dev] [cinder] Spec for volume migration improvement

2015-06-01 Thread Sheng Bo Hou
Hi all folks from Cinder, According to our agreement in the Vancouver summit, I submitted a cinder-spec to do the volume migration improvement. The spec is here for review: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/186327/. Please feel free to give your comments. @Mitsuhiro Tanino, I believe you can

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [stable] No longer doing stable point releases

2015-06-01 Thread Maish Saidel-Keesing
On 06/01/15 03:20, Steve Gordon wrote: - Original Message - From: Maish Saidel-Keesing mais...@maishsk.com To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org On 05/29/15 18:25, Matthew Thode wrote: On 05/29/2015 10:18 AM, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: What about release notes? How can we now communicate

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [stable] No longer doing stable point releases

2015-06-01 Thread Alan Pevec
You will get different checksums with tar and/or gzip, you can check the extracted files and they should be the same. Yes, content is the same, it's just difference in timestamps of folders and generated files (ChangeLog, egg-info etc). I would like to see signed commits in the 'official'

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][release] summit session summary: Release Versioning for Server Applications

2015-06-01 Thread John Garbutt
On 29 May 2015 at 22:38, Doug Hellmann d...@doughellmann.com wrote: As with our other semver projects, we will use pbr’s interpretation of the semver rules (http://docs.openstack.org/developer/pbr/semver.html) for minor updates and patch releases. I don’t believe we discussed whether to

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][release] summit session summary: Release Versioning for Server Applications

2015-06-01 Thread Doug Hellmann
Excerpts from John Garbutt's message of 2015-06-01 12:26:48 +0100: On 29 May 2015 at 22:38, Doug Hellmann d...@doughellmann.com wrote: As with our other semver projects, we will use pbr’s interpretation of the semver rules (http://docs.openstack.org/developer/pbr/semver.html) for minor

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] correct API for getting image metadata for an instance ?

2015-06-01 Thread John Garbutt
On 28 May 2015 at 19:26, Vladik Romanovsky vladik.romanov...@enovance.com wrote: As part of the work to object-ify the image metadata dicts, I'm looking at the current way the libvirt driver fetches image metadata for an instance, in cases where the compute manager hasn't already passed it

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova-docker] Looking for volunteers to take care of nova-docker

2015-06-01 Thread John Garbutt
Just to follow up here, we agreed the nova-docker team would report back in a nova IRC team meeting on how things are going post liberty-1. Thanks, John On 27 May 2015 at 16:29, Davanum Srinivas dava...@gmail.com wrote: Bich, Sure thing, just start on #nova-docker irc channel and we can talk

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] [all] Liberty summit: Updates in Glance

2015-06-01 Thread John Garbutt
On 1 June 2015 at 13:10, Flavio Percoco fla...@redhat.com wrote: On 01/06/15 11:57 +0100, John Garbutt wrote: On 26/05/15 13:54 -0400, Nikhil Komawar wrote: On 5/26/15 12:57 PM, Jesse Cook wrote: We also had some hallway talk about putting the v1 and v2 APIs on top of the v3 API.

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][scheduler] Updating Our Concept of Resources

2015-06-01 Thread Sylvain Bauza
Le 01/06/2015 14:40, Ed Leafe a écrit : Several of the discussions at Vancouver got me thinking about what seems to me to be a fundamental mis-match in Nova: the way we think about resources, and how we handle requesting/claiming them. I wrote down my initial thoughts

Re: [openstack-dev] [packaging] Adding packaging as an OpenStack project

2015-06-01 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 05/29/2015 11:03 PM, Jeremy Stanley wrote: On 2015-05-28 23:19:36 +0200 (+0200), Thomas Goirand wrote: [...] By the way, I was thinking about the sbuild package caching system, and thought: how about network mounting /var/cache/pbuilder/aptcache using something like Manila (or any other

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][release] summit session summary: Release Versioning for Server Applications

2015-06-01 Thread Doug Hellmann
Excerpts from Thierry Carrez's message of 2015-06-01 10:30:33 +0200: Doug Hellmann wrote: Please let me know if you think I missed any details, or misunderstood something as agreed to. Or, of course, if you weren’t there and see something wrong with the plan after looking at it now.

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [stable] No longer doing stable point releases

2015-06-01 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
On 29 May 2015 at 14:41, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.org wrote: Hi everyone, TL;DR: - We propose to stop tagging coordinated point releases (like 2015.1.1) - We continue maintaining stable branches as a trusted source of stable updates for all projects though Ideally I would still

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] [all] Liberty summit: Updates in Glance

2015-06-01 Thread Flavio Percoco
On 01/06/15 11:57 +0100, John Garbutt wrote: On 26/05/15 13:54 -0400, Nikhil Komawar wrote: On 5/26/15 12:57 PM, Jesse Cook wrote: We also had some hallway talk about putting the v1 and v2 APIs on top of the v3 API. This forces faster adoption, verifies supportability via v1 and v2

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][scheduler] Updating Our Concept of Resources

2015-06-01 Thread Ed Leafe
On Jun 1, 2015, at 7:49 AM, Sylvain Bauza sba...@redhat.com wrote: Long story short : https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/resource-objects Until we get this, it's difficult to discuss on different resources within Nova. Let's work by small steps and provide a versioned resource

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][bgpvpn] IRC meetings on BGP VPN interconnection API

2015-06-01 Thread Paul Michali
FYI, the channel is openstack-meeting-3. On Sun, May 31, 2015 at 10:41 PM Mohammad Hanif mha...@brocade.com wrote: Hi Thomas, The time reserved for the weekly IRC is 1600 UTC on Tuesdays ( http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/#Neutron_VPNaaS_Meeting). The IRC channel might not be available on

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][api] New micro-version needed for api bug fix or not?

2015-06-01 Thread John Garbutt
On 31 May 2015 at 14:15, Xu, Hejie hejie...@intel.com wrote: Replied in line with prefix [alex] -Original Message- From: John Garbutt [mailto:j...@johngarbutt.com] 1) We agreed changing a 500 error to an existing error (or making it succeed in the usual way) is a change that

[openstack-dev] LVS Load Balancer testing with OpenStack

2015-06-01 Thread Gayan Gunarathne
Hi All, We try to use the LVS load balancer with Open Stack[1]. Here we want to define the dummy interface for keepalived virtual server IP. But seems keepalived enable to resolve this Virtual IP with OpenStack. Have anyone tried the LVS load balancer with OpenStack before? Any suggestion or

[openstack-dev] [nova][scheduler] Updating Our Concept of Resources

2015-06-01 Thread Ed Leafe
Several of the discussions at Vancouver got me thinking about what seems to me to be a fundamental mis-match in Nova: the way we think about resources, and how we handle requesting/claiming them. I wrote down my initial thoughts (http://blog.leafe.com/rethinking-resources/), but as many of you

Re: [openstack-dev] [packaging] Adding packaging as an OpenStack project

2015-06-01 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 05/29/2015 11:37 AM, Derek Higgins wrote: Whats important I think is that we can change things to use sbuild without docker if that is what works best for you for debs. Ok. Though if we are to use delorean, we'll have to switch to that in upstream Debian as well, and I'm not sure if that's

Re: [openstack-dev] [new][app-catalog] App Catalog next steps

2015-06-01 Thread Alexander Tivelkov
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 7:55 PM, Fox, Kevin M kevin@pnnl.gov wrote: As an Op, I really really want to replace one image with a new one atomically with security updates preapplied. Think shellshock, ghost, etc. It will be basically be the same exact image as before, but patched.

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [stable] No longer doing stable point releases

2015-06-01 Thread Matthias Runge
On 01/06/15 12:10, Flavio Percoco wrote: Is this a real problem? What are *tarball timestamps* used for in the packaging world? I'm sure there's a way we can workaround this issue. timestamps just give you a hint, how old the source actually is, not when a packager downloaded the tarball

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][api] New micro-version needed for api bug fix or not?

2015-06-01 Thread John Garbutt
On 29 May 2015 at 19:58, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote: On 05/29/2015 05:04 AM, John Garbutt wrote: On 29 May 2015 at 09:00, Sahid Orentino Ferdjaoui sahid.ferdja...@redhat.com wrote: On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 08:47:01AM +0200, Jens Rosenboom wrote: As the discussion in

Re: [openstack-dev] Barbican : Regarding the API support for Order and Consumer Resource

2015-06-01 Thread Asha Seshagiri
Editing the subject On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 2:35 AM, Asha Seshagiri asha.seshag...@gmail.com wrote: Hi All , Would like to know why have we removed the API details for Order and Consumer Resource in the following update link for API Documentation of Barbican

Re: [openstack-dev] Barbican : Regarding the API support for Order and Consumer Resource

2015-06-01 Thread John Vrbanac
Asha, We haven't removed anything. Unfortunately, no one has had the chance to port those resources over from the old github wiki page and into the new sphinx format yet. Also, yes they are still supported. John Vrbanac From: Asha Seshagiri

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [stable] No longer doing stable point releases

2015-06-01 Thread Ihar Hrachyshka
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 05/29/2015 06:24 PM, Jeremy Stanley wrote: On 2015-05-29 17:50:01 +0200 (+0200), Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: [...] if we attempt to fix a security issue that has a backwards incompatible fix, then we are forced in introducing a new configuration

Re: [openstack-dev] [Zaqar][all] Zaqar will stay... Lots of work ahead

2015-06-01 Thread Flavio Percoco
On 31/05/15 18:12 +, Ildikó Váncsa wrote: Hi All, I would like to ask about the user-facing notifications part of the list. Do you have a roadmap for this? Is this driven by the Zaqar team? What are the next steps? Hey, This will require cross-project efforts and we (the Zaqar team)

Re: [openstack-dev] [Zaqar][all] Zaqar will stay... Lots of work ahead

2015-06-01 Thread Flavio Percoco
On 28/05/15 16:48 +0100, Gordon Sim wrote: On 05/27/2015 05:08 PM, Hayes, Graham wrote: It was agreed that Zaqar would look at a oslo_messaging driver for the services that did not agree with the 3 options presented. Another option there would be to add amqp 1.0 support to zaqar, and then

Re: [openstack-dev] [Magnum] Magnum installation problem with devstack kilo

2015-06-01 Thread Qiming Teng
Looks like a bug to be filed for devstack. Based on some discussions here [1], this is not a magnum problem. Maybe the worlddump.py file in devstack should add a '-xdev' param to avoid touching DVFS. [1]

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] [all] Liberty summit: Updates in Glance

2015-06-01 Thread Flavio Percoco
On 27/05/15 11:30 -0400, Nikhil Komawar wrote: I kinda agree with all 3 of you, possibly because there are Grey areas on how best we can actually do this. We are talking about one cycle ahead to the very least. While that is a great thing to do, I think we should focus on making the current

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [stable] No longer doing stable point releases

2015-06-01 Thread Robert Collins
On 1 Jun 2015 10:50 am, Alan Pevec ape...@gmail.com wrote: 2015-05-29 18:30 GMT+02:00 Jeremy Stanley fu...@yuggoth.org: On 2015-05-29 16:30:12 +0100 (+0100), Dave Walker wrote: This is generally my opinion as-well, I always hoped that *every* commit would be considered a release rather

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [stable] No longer doing stable point releases

2015-06-01 Thread Ihar Hrachyshka
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 06/01/2015 02:20 AM, Steve Gordon wrote: - Original Message - From: Maish Saidel-Keesing mais...@maishsk.com To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org On 05/29/15 18:25, Matthew Thode wrote: On 05/29/2015 10:18 AM, Ihar Hrachyshka

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] - dnsmasq 'dhcp-authoritative' option broke multiple DHCP servers

2015-06-01 Thread Kevin Benton
But I don't know that does NAK matters? Yes, some clients will honor it and re-request, so they end up in a loop. I believe the dhcp client in the Cirros image does this. dhcp-authoritative is really a simple way to solve the problem of that dnsmasq will lose lease if restarted Yes,

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] I think nova behaves poorly when booting multiple instances

2015-06-01 Thread John Garbutt
On 29 May 2015 at 17:10, Chris Friesen chris.frie...@windriver.com wrote: On 05/29/2015 06:27 AM, John Garbutt wrote: On 27 May 2015 at 23:36, Robert Collins robe...@robertcollins.net wrote: On 26 May 2015 at 03:37, Chris Friesen chris.frie...@windriver.com wrote: Basically the problem is

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] Liberty Priorities

2015-06-01 Thread Flavio Percoco
On 29/05/15 14:50 +0200, Sebastien Han wrote: @Flavio: I wrote this, so we don’t forget (I guess you know how much I want this one ^^). If you already committed on it, then it is awesome :). Ah, that makes sense now. cool. So yeah, I'll be focusing on improving tasks and image conversion for

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] [all] Liberty summit: Updates in Glance

2015-06-01 Thread John Garbutt
On 26/05/15 13:54 -0400, Nikhil Komawar wrote: On 5/26/15 12:57 PM, Jesse Cook wrote: We also had some hallway talk about putting the v1 and v2 APIs on top of the v3 API. This forces faster adoption, verifies supportability via v1 and v2 tests, increases supportability of v1 and v2

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] - dnsmasq 'dhcp-authoritative' option broke multiple DHCP servers

2015-06-01 Thread Damon Wang
Hi Benton, I'm sorry that seems I missed your discuss. I just seen your patch's merge yesterday. But I don't know that does NAK matters? A client will get a ACK and a NAK if there are two agents, it's ok because client will assign IP address successfully according to the ACK. dhcp-authoritative

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [stable] No longer doing stable point releases

2015-06-01 Thread Alan Pevec
One issue is how would we provide source tarballs, statically hosting tarballs for each and every micro version is not realistic, also those wouldn't be signed. Sorry, but why isn't it realistic, and why wouldn't they be signed? I thought storage requirements to generate tarball for each

Re: [openstack-dev] Nodepool: puppet puts wrong key in authorized_keys in slave

2015-06-01 Thread Eduard Matei
Hi Ramy, I tried the disk-image-builder and now i can't ssh with any user with any key. Everytime i get Permission denied (publickey).. Here's my nodepool.yaml: script-dir: /etc/nodepool/scripts elements-dir: /etc/nodepool/elements images-dir: /opt/nodepool_dib dburi:

Re: [openstack-dev] [Magnum] Magnum installation problem with devstack kilo

2015-06-01 Thread Baohua Yang
Thanks! Reported the bug here at https://bugs.launchpad.net/magnum/+bug/1460574. On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 4:37 PM, Kai Qiang Wu wk...@cn.ibm.com wrote: Hi BaoHua, For kilo you test, I am not sure what's the steps you did, as the dev-guide is for master branch development. If you have any

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [stable] No longer doing stable point releases

2015-06-01 Thread Matthias Runge
On 01/06/15 10:29, Flavio Percoco wrote: AFAIK, these tarballs are generated on the flight in GH. Couldn't we do the same ? The issue with on-the-fly generation is: timestamps are actually new, and not the same as when the release was tagged. And: you probably want some hashes to verify,

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [stable] No longer doing stable point releases

2015-06-01 Thread Flavio Percoco
On 01/06/15 11:27 +0200, Matthias Runge wrote: On 01/06/15 10:29, Flavio Percoco wrote: AFAIK, these tarballs are generated on the flight in GH. Couldn't we do the same ? s/flight/fly+(facepalm)/ LOL, on the *flight* would be really hard. The issue with on-the-fly generation is: timestamps

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [stable] No longer doing stable point releases

2015-06-01 Thread Flavio Percoco
On 01/06/15 10:07 +0200, Alan Pevec wrote: One issue is how would we provide source tarballs, statically hosting tarballs for each and every micro version is not realistic, also those wouldn't be signed. Sorry, but why isn't it realistic, and why wouldn't they be signed? I thought storage

Re: [openstack-dev] [Zaqar][all] Zaqar will stay... Lots of work ahead

2015-06-01 Thread Flavio Percoco
On 27/05/15 11:19 -0700, Clint Byrum wrote: Excerpts from Zane Bitter's message of 2015-05-27 10:40:48 -0700: On 27/05/15 12:42, Clint Byrum wrote: == Crazy idea section == One thing I never had a chance to discuss with any of the Zaqar devs that I would find interesting is an email-only

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [stable] No longer doing stable point releases

2015-06-01 Thread Ihar Hrachyshka
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 05/29/2015 11:46 PM, Haïkel wrote: A release version makes it easy to know what fixes are shipped in a package. If you rebase on stable branches, then you can just put the git sha1sum (though, it's not very friendly) in the version, and

Re: [openstack-dev] [Magnum] Magnum installation problem with devstack kilo

2015-06-01 Thread Kai Qiang Wu
Hi BaoHua, For kilo you test, I am not sure what's the steps you did, as the dev-guide is for master branch development. If you have any questions, you can ask in #openstack-containers IRC channel or file bug in launchpad. Thanks Best Wishes,

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [stable] No longer doing stable point releases

2015-06-01 Thread Thierry Carrez
Thierry Carrez wrote: TL;DR: - We propose to stop tagging coordinated point releases (like 2015.1.1) - We continue maintaining stable branches as a trusted source of stable updates for all projects though Thanks everyone for the constructive discussion on this. Lots of good stuff. Let me

Re: [openstack-dev] Nodepool: puppet puts wrong key in authorized_keys in slave

2015-06-01 Thread Eduard Matei
Hi, Seems i missed a step, NODEPOOL_SSH_KEY was not exported so the image was not properly configured. Now i got an instance that is added to the jenkins master as slave and it's online. Thanks. Eduard __ OpenStack

[openstack-dev] How to configure a Rsync with password in OpenStack Swift

2015-06-01 Thread Andy Xie
how to configure a rsync with password in OpenStack Swift? I am currently working on Swift and configure it to working with rsync without a password properly. However, i wander if we can configure rsync with a password so that we can make rsync more safe. Is there any way or manual to instruct to

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][release] summit session summary: Release Versioning for Server Applications

2015-06-01 Thread Thierry Carrez
Doug Hellmann wrote: Please let me know if you think I missed any details, or misunderstood something as agreed to. Or, of course, if you weren’t there and see something wrong with the plan after looking at it now. We'd also provide a tool to easily translate the series name with the current

[openstack-dev] Regarding the API support for Order and Consumer Resource

2015-06-01 Thread Asha Seshagiri
Hi All , Would like to know why have we removed the API details for Order and Consumer Resource in the following update link for API Documentation of Barbican http://docs.openstack.org/developer/barbican/api/index.html Does the Barbican support order and consumer resource now ? Any help

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [stable] No longer doing stable point releases

2015-06-01 Thread Flavio Percoco
On 29/05/15 09:44 -0500, Matt Riedemann wrote: On 5/29/2015 8:41 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: Hi everyone, TL;DR: - We propose to stop tagging coordinated point releases (like 2015.1.1) - We continue maintaining stable branches as a trusted source of stable updates for all projects though Long

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Progressing/tracking work on libvirt / vif drivers

2015-06-01 Thread John Garbutt
On 29 May 2015 at 18:32, Neil Jerram neil.jer...@metaswitch.com wrote: Hi all, Per yesterday's IRC meeting [1], and discussion in Vancouver, Nova work is being somewhat driven by the etherpad at [2]. But this etherpad doesn't have a section for libvirt / vif driver changes. The log at [1]

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [stable] No longer doing stable point releases

2015-06-01 Thread Robert Collins
On 1 Jun 2015 8:07 pm, Alan Pevec ape...@gmail.com wrote: One issue is how would we provide source tarballs, statically hosting tarballs for each and every micro version is not realistic, also those wouldn't be signed. Sorry, but why isn't it realistic, and why wouldn't they be signed?

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [stable] No longer doing stable point releases

2015-06-01 Thread Thierry Carrez
Thierry Carrez wrote: Thanks everyone for the constructive discussion on this. Lots of good stuff. Let me summarize the objections so far: 1. we'd lose the focus rhythm Point releases triggered some attention to stable branches: the necessity to fix the CI there when it's broken, and a

Re: [openstack-dev] [release] WSME 0.7.0

2015-06-01 Thread Stéphane Bisinger
Thank you!! Hopefully this release will be the starting point for a small rebirth of the WSME project. Many bugs still need fixes, the code needs improvements and probably some standardisation towards the OpenStack guidelines. It would be very useful to receive some feedback from the projects

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [stable] No longer doing stable point releases

2015-06-01 Thread Jeremy Stanley
On 2015-06-01 12:04:34 +0200 (+0200), Thierry Carrez wrote: Thierry Carrez wrote: [...] 2. it would be difficult to get proper release notes If we don't have point releases anymore, we don't have release notes anymore. Release notes contain various types of information: the list of

[openstack-dev] [Infra] Meeting Tuesday June 2nd at 19:00 UTC

2015-06-01 Thread Elizabeth K. Joseph
Hi everyone, The OpenStack Infrastructure (Infra) team is having our next weekly meeting on Tuesday June 2nd, at 19:00 UTC in #openstack-meeting Meeting agenda available here: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/InfraTeamMeeting (anyone is welcome to to add agenda items) Everyone

[openstack-dev] [nova] Mellanox CI Issues

2015-06-01 Thread Dan Smith
Hi, Mellanox CI has been broken for a while now. Test runs are reported as successful after an impossibly short less-than-a-minute run. Could the owners of this please take a look and address the problem? At least disabling commenting while working on the issue would be helpful. Also, on

[openstack-dev] [neutron][vnaas] IRC Meeting scheduled for June 2nd...

2015-06-01 Thread Paul Michali
Since we had a bunch of interest at the Summit in VPN, we'll hold a meeting at our time-slot, Tuesday, 1600 UTC, openstack-meeting-3, tomorrow on June 2nd. I updated the agenda. If you have other updates, please add them to the wiki page: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/VPNaaS Regards,

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Progressing/tracking work on libvirt / vif drivers

2015-06-01 Thread Neil Jerram
On 01/06/15 14:23, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: On Mon, Jun 01, 2015 at 09:44:24AM +0100, John Garbutt wrote: On 29 May 2015 at 18:32, Neil Jerram neil.jer...@metaswitch.com wrote: Hi all, Per yesterday's IRC meeting [1], and discussion in Vancouver, Nova work is being somewhat driven by the

Re: [openstack-dev] Barbican : Regarding the API support for Order and Consumer Resource

2015-06-01 Thread Asha Seshagiri
Thanks a lot John for your response :) On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 3:02 AM, John Vrbanac john.vrba...@rackspace.com wrote: Asha, We haven't removed anything. Unfortunately, no one has had the chance to port those resources over from the old github wiki page and into the new sphinx format yet.

[openstack-dev] [nova] Add new VIF Type

2015-06-01 Thread Andreas Scheuring
Hi, what are the prereqs to get a spec for a new nova VIF type approved? In my case I'm planning for a new neutron ml2 driver and agent (on stackforge) that adds general support for macvtap to neutron. I've not yet published anything regarding the neutron part so far - but this will happen in

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][bgpvpn] IRC meetings on BGP VPN interconnection API

2015-06-01 Thread thomas.morin
Hi Paul, all, Yes, it's good to have a discussion on BGP VPN and edge VPN proposals during the VPNaaS meeting. At least Mathieu and I will participate to see how we can help. To avoid confusion we think it's good to keep separate the discussion on the details of the work around the

Re: [openstack-dev] [qa] Need volunteers for tempest bug triage

2015-06-01 Thread David Kranz
On 05/30/2015 09:15 AM, Kashyap Chamarthy wrote: On Sat, May 30, 2015 at 03:52:02PM +0300, Yaroslav Lobankov wrote: Hi everyone, Is it possible for other people (not only core reviewers) to participate in bug triage? I would like to help in doing this. Absolutely. There's no such silly rule

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [stable] No longer doing stable point releases

2015-06-01 Thread Jeremy Stanley
On 2015-06-01 17:32:03 +0200 (+0200), Alan Pevec wrote: [...] and *Plan D* would be to start doing automatic per-project micro-versions on each commit: e.g. 2015.1.N where N is increased on each commit. There's just TBD item how to provide source tarballs for this. [...] That would happen

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [stable] No longer doing stable point releases

2015-06-01 Thread Jeremy Stanley
On 2015-06-01 12:20:22 +0100 (+0100), Dimitri John Ledkov wrote: [...] If the stable tarball snapshots had stable, ever increasing names, I would switch to using those straight away. (Out of which $ git describe --tags satisfies said requirement) Current PBR releases already create

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] [all] Liberty summit: Updates in Glance

2015-06-01 Thread Steve Lewis
On Monday, June 1, 2015 05:30, John Garbutt j...@johngarbutt.com wrote: On 1 June 2015 at 13:10, Flavio Percoco fla...@redhat.com wrote: AFAIK, the biggest issue right now is changed-since which is something Glance doesn't have in v2 but it's exposed throught Nova's image API. Thats the big

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][release] summit session summary: Release Versioning for Server Applications

2015-06-01 Thread Jeremy Stanley
On 2015-06-01 08:53:41 -0400 (-0400), Doug Hellmann wrote: [...] pbr generates versions like x.y.z.postN on each commit now, indicating N commits since the x.y.z tag. So I think we're OK with version numbers without having to do any tagging explicitly. [...] Well, technically x.y.(z+1).devN

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] I think nova behaves poorly when booting multiple instances

2015-06-01 Thread Ed Leafe
On Jun 1, 2015, at 8:26 AM, Andrew Laski and...@lascii.com wrote: In any case, even if we wanted to deprecate it (and I think an argument could be made for that) we still have to decide what the correct behaviour should be for the API as it exists today. In my view the current behaviour

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [stable] No longer doing stable point releases

2015-06-01 Thread Alan Pevec
*Plan C* would be to just let projects tag stable point releases from time to time. That would solve all the original stated problems. And that would solve objections 2 and 3, which I think are the most valid ones. and *Plan D* would be to start doing automatic per-project micro-versions on

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [stable] No longer doing stable point releases

2015-06-01 Thread Haïkel
2015-06-01 17:32 GMT+02:00 Alan Pevec ape...@gmail.com: *Plan C* would be to just let projects tag stable point releases from time to time. That would solve all the original stated problems. And that would solve objections 2 and 3, which I think are the most valid ones. and *Plan D* would be

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [stable] No longer doing stable point releases

2015-06-01 Thread Ian Cordasco
On 6/1/15, 06:20, Dimitri John Ledkov dimitri.j.led...@intel.com wrote: On 29 May 2015 at 14:41, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.org wrote: Hi everyone, TL;DR: - We propose to stop tagging coordinated point releases (like 2015.1.1) - We continue maintaining stable branches as a trusted

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][release] summit session summary: Release Versioning for Server Applications

2015-06-01 Thread Thierry Carrez
Doug Hellmann wrote: Excerpts from Thierry Carrez's message of 2015-06-01 10:30:33 +0200: Doug Hellmann wrote: Please let me know if you think I missed any details, or misunderstood something as agreed to. Or, of course, if you weren’t there and see something wrong with the plan after

Re: [openstack-dev] [akanda] meeting time change

2015-06-01 Thread sean roberts
Note that the 11am PDT meeting has moved to the #openstack-meeting channel On Sun, May 31, 2015 at 2:20 PM, sean roberts seanrobert...@gmail.com wrote: Starting tomorrow, the akanda project will be meeting on #openstack-meeting at 11:00 PDT. Agenda is in the usual place

Re: [openstack-dev] [Magnum] Does Bay/Baymodel name should be a required option when creating a Bay/Baymodel

2015-06-01 Thread Jay Lau
2015-06-01 21:54 GMT+08:00 Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com: On 05/31/2015 05:38 PM, Jay Lau wrote: Just want to use ML to trigger more discussion here. There are now bugs/patches tracing this, but seems more discussions are needed before we come to a conclusion.

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][bgpvpn] IRC meetings on BGP VPN interconnection API

2015-06-01 Thread thomas.morin
Hi, We confirm this meeting for tomorrow Tuesday 2nd @15:00 UTC on #openstack-meeting-alt . We'll discuss tomorrow what we want to do for future IRC meetings (day, time, periodicity, etc.). (Everyone is encouraged to also follow the VPNaaS meeting that will follow) Best, -Thomas

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [stable] No longer doing stable point releases

2015-06-01 Thread Jeremy Stanley
On 2015-06-01 15:57:17 + (+), Jeremy Stanley wrote: [...] The biggest hurdle is that we'd need a separate upload job name for those since the current version of Zuul lacks a way to run a particular job for different branches in different pipelines (we'd want to do versioned uploads for

[openstack-dev] [mistral] Team meeting - 2015/06/01

2015-06-01 Thread Renat Akhmerov
Hi Mistral team, This is just a reminder that we’ll have a team meeting today at #openstack-meeting at 16.00 UTC (not 16.20 like it was during a couple of months!) Agenda: Review action items Current status (progress, issues, roadblocks, further plans) Liberty Roadmap Add seconds granularity

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] I think nova behaves poorly when booting multiple instances

2015-06-01 Thread Andrew Laski
On 05/27/15 at 07:38pm, Chris Friesen wrote: On 05/27/2015 05:09 PM, Fox, Kevin M wrote: If the current behavior is broken, and the behavior is causing problems with things like fixing quota's, should it just be deprecated and pushed off to orchestration rather then change it? Is this causing

[openstack-dev] [release] WSME 0.7.0

2015-06-01 Thread Doug Hellmann
We are jubilant to announce the release of: wsme 0.7.0: Simplify the writing of REST APIs, and extend them with additional protocols. With source available at: http://git.openstack.org/cgit/stackforge/wsme For more details, please see the git log history below and:

Re: [openstack-dev] [Magnum] Does Bay/Baymodel name should be a required option when creating a Bay/Baymodel

2015-06-01 Thread Jay Pipes
On 05/31/2015 05:38 PM, Jay Lau wrote: Just want to use ML to trigger more discussion here. There are now bugs/patches tracing this, but seems more discussions are needed before we come to a conclusion. https://bugs.launchpad.net/magnum/+bug/1453732 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/181839/

[openstack-dev] [release][barbican] python-barbicanclient 3.2.0

2015-06-01 Thread Doug Hellmann
We are happy to announce the release of: python-barbicanclient 3.2.0: Client Library for OpenStack Barbican Key Management API With source available at: http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/python-barbicanclient For more details, please see the git log history below and:

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla] gate failing sporadically

2015-06-01 Thread Jeff Peeler
On Sat, May 30, 2015 at 03:00:04AM +, Steven Dake (stdake) wrote: Hey Folks, I noticed the Kolla functional gate is failing sporadically. It seems that sometimes an image doesn’t build. http://logs.openstack.org/75/186475/1/check/check-kolla-functional-f21/8f23913/console.html (For the

[openstack-dev] [release][oslo] oslo.middleware 1.3.0

2015-06-01 Thread Doug Hellmann
We are delighted to announce the release of: oslo.middleware 1.3.0: Oslo Middleware library With source available at: http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/oslo.middleware For more details, please see the git log history below and:

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] Some Changes to Cinder Core

2015-06-01 Thread Sean McGinnis
Finally back after a few days offline. Thanks everyone. Just glad to be part of this great group. Thank you for all the positive comments from cores and non-cores alike. Sean On 05/26/2015 04:42 PM, Ivan Kolodyazhny wrote: +1, Welcome to the team, Sean. Regards, Ivan Kolodyazhny On Wed,

[openstack-dev] [all] Project Team Guide workgroup planning a virtual sprint Jun 18-19

2015-06-01 Thread Thierry Carrez
Hi everyone, In an attempt to document shared understandings and the OpenStack way, the Technical Committee created a workgroup around the idea of a Project Team Guide. This group is however open to anyone who would like to contribute. The current outline for the guide lives here:

Re: [openstack-dev] [release][neutron] python-neutronclient 2.6.0

2015-06-01 Thread Ihar Hrachyshka
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 I have a suggestion... Since it's not obvious now which stable branch a release corresponds to, can we add that info into release note email body somewhere for the sake of those who may closely track stable updates but not so much those

Re: [openstack-dev] [release][cinder] os-brick 0.2.0

2015-06-01 Thread Doug Hellmann
Excerpts from Doug Hellmann's message of 2015-06-01 10:29:32 -0400: We are jubilant to announce the release of: os-brick 0.2.0: OpenStack Cinder brick library for managing local volume attaches With source available at: http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/os-brick For more

Re: [openstack-dev] [release][tripleo] os-collect-config 0.1.35

2015-06-01 Thread Doug Hellmann
Excerpts from Doug Hellmann's message of 2015-06-01 10:31:36 -0400: We are excited to announce the release of: os-collect-config 0.1.35: Collect and cache metadata, run hooks on changes. For more details, please see the git log history below. Changes in os-collect-config

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] - dnsmasq 'dhcp-authoritative' option broke multiple DHCP servers

2015-06-01 Thread Damon Wang
Thanks! I'll reconsider about this. 2015-06-01 16:54 GMT+08:00 Kevin Benton blak...@gmail.com: But I don't know that does NAK matters? Yes, some clients will honor it and re-request, so they end up in a loop. I believe the dhcp client in the Cirros image does this. dhcp-authoritative is

[openstack-dev] [release][ironic] python-ironicclient 0.7.0

2015-06-01 Thread Doug Hellmann
We are thrilled to announce the release of: python-ironicclient 0.7.0: OpenStack Bare Metal Provisioning API Client Library With source available at: http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/python-ironicclient For more details, please see the git log history below and:

[openstack-dev] [release][cinder] os-brick 0.2.0

2015-06-01 Thread Doug Hellmann
We are jubilant to announce the release of: os-brick 0.2.0: OpenStack Cinder brick library for managing local volume attaches With source available at: http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/os-brick For more details, please see the git log history below and:

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] [all] Liberty summit: Updates in Glance

2015-06-01 Thread Flavio Percoco
On 01/06/15 13:30 +0100, John Garbutt wrote: On 1 June 2015 at 13:10, Flavio Percoco fla...@redhat.com wrote: On 01/06/15 11:57 +0100, John Garbutt wrote: On 26/05/15 13:54 -0400, Nikhil Komawar wrote: On 5/26/15 12:57 PM, Jesse Cook wrote: We also had some hallway talk about putting the

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Progressing/tracking work on libvirt / vif drivers

2015-06-01 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Mon, Jun 01, 2015 at 09:44:24AM +0100, John Garbutt wrote: On 29 May 2015 at 18:32, Neil Jerram neil.jer...@metaswitch.com wrote: Hi all, Per yesterday's IRC meeting [1], and discussion in Vancouver, Nova work is being somewhat driven by the etherpad at [2]. But this etherpad doesn't

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] Some Changes to Cinder Core

2015-06-01 Thread Tom Barron
Well deserved, and hope you had a nice break. __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe

[openstack-dev] [release][trove] python-troveclient 1.2.0

2015-06-01 Thread Doug Hellmann
We are delighted to announce the release of: python-troveclient 1.2.0: Client library for OpenStack DBaaS API With source available at: http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/python-troveclient For more details, please see the git log history below and:

[openstack-dev] [release][tripleo] os-collect-config 0.1.35

2015-06-01 Thread Doug Hellmann
We are excited to announce the release of: os-collect-config 0.1.35: Collect and cache metadata, run hooks on changes. For more details, please see the git log history below. Changes in os-collect-config 0.1.34..0.1.35 --- 4a41f0b Drop use of 'oslo'

Re: [openstack-dev] [release][manila] python-manilaclient 1.2.0

2015-06-01 Thread Doug Hellmann
Excerpts from Doug Hellmann's message of 2015-06-01 10:27:38 -0400: We are thrilled to announce the release of: python-manilaclient 1.2.0: Client library for OpenStack Manila API. With source available at: http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/python-manilaclient For more

[openstack-dev] [release][manila] python-manilaclient 1.2.0

2015-06-01 Thread Doug Hellmann
We are thrilled to announce the release of: python-manilaclient 1.2.0: Client library for OpenStack Manila API. With source available at: http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/python-manilaclient For more details, please see the git log history below and:

Re: [openstack-dev] [Zaqar][all] Zaqar will stay... Lots of work ahead

2015-06-01 Thread Ryan Brown
On 06/01/2015 04:34 AM, Flavio Percoco wrote: On 31/05/15 18:12 +, Ildikó Váncsa wrote: Hi All, I would like to ask about the user-facing notifications part of the list. Do you have a roadmap for this? Is this driven by the Zaqar team? What are the next steps? Hey, This will

  1   2   >