Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Tom Cammann for core

2015-07-10 Thread Davanum Srinivas
+1 from me. -- dims On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 7:40 PM, Madhuri madhuri.ra...@gmail.com wrote: +1 to Tom for his great reviews. Regards, Madhuri On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 11:20 AM, Adrian Otto adrian.o...@rackspace.com wrote: Team, Tom Cammann (tcammann) has become a valued Magnum

[openstack-dev] [Sahara] Questions about how Sahara use trust ?

2015-07-10 Thread Li, Chen
Hi Sahara guys, When sahara create a transient cluster, it create a trust with sahara admin user. https://github.com/openstack/sahara/blob/master/sahara/service/ops.py#L239-L240 https://github.com/openstack/sahara/blob/master/sahara/service/trusts.py#L79 When sahara deal with swift, it create

[openstack-dev] [swift] [ceilometer] Ceilometer log dir permissions bust swift proxy

2015-07-10 Thread Mark Kirkwood
Hi, I'm deploying a swift 1.13 cluster on Ubuntu 14.04 and enabling ceilometer in the proxy pipeline results in it not working. The cause appears to be the log directory perms (note I am running the proxy under Apache): [Fri Jul 10 05:12:15.126214 2015] [:error] [pid 6844:tid

Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Tom Cammann for core

2015-07-10 Thread Kai Qiang Wu
+1 from me. Good review comments! @Tom Best Wishes, Kai Qiang Wu (吴开强 Kennan) IBM China System and Technology Lab, Beijing E-mail: wk...@cn.ibm.com Tel: 86-10-82451647 Address: Building 28(Ring Building),

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][tests] Fix it friday! [mock failure in CI]

2015-07-10 Thread Thierry Carrez
Robert Collins wrote: Good news everybody, mock 1.1.0 is now out. This backports all the improvements over the last couple of years, making it fully synchronised with cPython master. Yay. Bad news. Lots of unit tests jobs have suffered falled from this. But - none of the things I've

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][tests] Fix it friday! [mock failure in CI]

2015-07-10 Thread Kevin Benton
How do we test to see what is failing in each project with the new version? Also, I'm responsible for the reference to the private mock method in Neutron. That particular reference is to prevent people from patching the same target twice because mock.patch.stopall() unwinds patches in a

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][tests] Fix it friday! [mock failure in CI]

2015-07-10 Thread Robert Collins
On 10 July 2015 at 20:23, Kevin Benton blak...@gmail.com wrote: How do we test to see what is failing in each project with the new version? Look at any CI failure in the last 5 hours or so. Or run tox :). Also, I'm responsible for the reference to the private mock method in Neutron. That

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][tests] Fix it friday! [mock failure in CI]

2015-07-10 Thread Robert Collins
On 10 July 2015 at 20:18, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.org wrote: Robert Collins wrote: Good news everybody, mock 1.1.0 is now out. This backports all the ... 1.1.0 makes that an error, for methods with assert prefixes - unless unsafe is specifically requested. So a big chunk of the

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Setting epoch in setup.cfg??

2015-07-10 Thread Thierry Carrez
Joshua Harlow wrote: Hi all, I was thinking about those who are packaging with venvs (and using the version of a project in the venv file name); like what anvil[1] is now capable of (and does this in the gate now[2]) or packaging via rpms (which anvil also does) and they are going to be

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack][cinder]A discussion about quota update lower than current usage.

2015-07-10 Thread Duncan Thomas
Ah, I apologise, I missed the but where it defaults to force=true. I withdraw the objection. I've no strung feelings about the change either way, in that case. On 10 Jul 2015 10:58, Gorka Eguileor gegui...@redhat.com wrote: On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 10:28:06AM +0300, Duncan Thomas wrote: That

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] [Taskflow]Review help to cinder bp:Implement function to manage/unmanage snapshots

2015-07-10 Thread Dulko, Michal
Feel free to start the work. Right now I’m working on c-vol’s create_volume flow. Review is there: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/193167/ From: hao wang [mailto:sxmatch1...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, July 10, 2015 4:47 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject:

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][tests] Fix it friday! [mock failure in CI]

2015-07-10 Thread Thierry Carrez
Kevin Benton wrote: How do we test to see what is failing in each project with the new version? Just watch one of the thousands tests currently failing in zuul: http://status.openstack.org/zuul/ Or see the recent periodic stable maint jobs fail reports at:

[openstack-dev] [Cinder]Restrict volume creation based on type

2015-07-10 Thread Eduard Matei
Hi, We've been testing a multi-node setup with our driver and ended up in a strange situation: - having a driver configured on multiple cinder nodes (But not all) - having a volume type (available) - creating a volume with specified volume type causes the volume to be created (attempted) on a

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][tests] Fix it friday! [mock failure in CI]

2015-07-10 Thread Kevin Benton
Thanks. I didn't realize it was already breaking everything. I thought it might have been stuck in requirements bump patch somewhere. Thats fixed in 1.1.0. So you should be able to unwind that. If you need a short term workaround, its in mock.mock now. Yeah, I know it's fixed, I reported the

[openstack-dev] [nova][nova-docker]

2015-07-10 Thread Daniel Depaoli
Hi all. I have a brief question about nova and nova-docker. In nova-docker I add a piece of code when I raise an exception, in particular in 'novadocker/virt/docker/driver.py', function '_start_container': * exitcode=self.docker.inspect_container(container_id)['State']['ExitCode']* *if

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][tests] Fix it friday! [mock failure in CI]

2015-07-10 Thread Robert Collins
On 10 July 2015 at 20:50, Kevin Benton blak...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks. I didn't realize it was already breaking everything. I thought it might have been stuck in requirements bump patch somewhere. Thats fixed in 1.1.0. So you should be able to unwind that. If you need a short term workaround,

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] [Openstack] Rescinding the M name decision

2015-07-10 Thread Thierry Carrez
Adam Lawson wrote: The alternative of course is to just number the releases since names ultimately don't mean anything but it seems there are problems with that level of simplicity. I personally prefer Tristan's suggestion to keep it as simple as possible. In a few years we'll run out of

Re: [openstack-dev] [qa][tempest] kwargs of service clients for POST/PUT methods

2015-07-10 Thread Ken'ichi Ohmichi
Hi Anne, 2015-07-09 12:22 GMT+09:00 Anne Gentle annegen...@justwriteclick.com: On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 9:48 PM, GHANSHYAM MANN ghanshyamm...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 9:39 AM, Ken'ichi Ohmichi ken1ohmi...@gmail.com wrote: 2015-07-08 16:42 GMT+09:00 Ken'ichi Ohmichi

[openstack-dev] [all][tests] Fix it friday! [mock failure in CI]

2015-07-10 Thread Robert Collins
Good news everybody, mock 1.1.0 is now out. This backports all the improvements over the last couple of years, making it fully synchronised with cPython master. Yay. Bad news. Lots of unit tests jobs have suffered falled from this. But - none of the things I've looked into so far are bugs in

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack][cinder]A discussion about quota update lower than current usage.

2015-07-10 Thread Gorka Eguileor
On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 10:28:06AM +0300, Duncan Thomas wrote: That is a semantic change to the api that will break anybody who has tooling expecting the current behavior. Since there are perfectly sensible uses of the current behavior, that is not a good thing. Hi Duncan, I don't think that

[openstack-dev] [nova] Switching the bug status of ~200 bugs at once; Problem?

2015-07-10 Thread Markus Zoeller
I'd like to switch the status of ~200 bugs at once to adjust the bookkeeping in LaunchPad. This will concern Confirmed and Triaged bugs which have an assignee [1]. AFAIK they should be In Progress. I'm concerned if this would affect some reports I'm not aware of in a bad way. So, if you think

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] wrong network for keystone endpoint in 6.1 ?

2015-07-10 Thread Daniel Comnea
I know about the flow but what i'm questioning is: admin endpoint is mapped to br-mgmt subnet (you do have the HAproxy as below defined in 6.1. In 6.0 and before you had no HAproxy) listen keystone-2 bind 192.168.20.3:35357 option httpchk option httplog option httpclose server

Re: [openstack-dev] [Tricircle]Tricircle Weekly Team Meeting 2015.07.08 Roundup

2015-07-10 Thread joehuang
Hello, The scenario I mentioned in the weekly meeting is described in the following google doc: https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1s0tRI3GtzSR5Dcl0YGSZ2upEwdqPsqU0d6-rq0CRMQo/edit#slide=id.gb6e146160_0_25 To reduce the complexity, I suggest we focus on the scenario 1 in the current

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack][cinder]A discussion about quota update lower than current usage.

2015-07-10 Thread Duncan Thomas
That is a semantic change to the api that will break anybody who has tooling expecting the current behavior. Since there are perfectly sensible uses of the current behavior, that is not a good thing. On 10 Jul 2015 07:33, hao wang sxmatch1...@gmail.com wrote: Cinder now doesn't check the

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] [Openstack] Rescinding the M name decision

2015-07-10 Thread Neil Jerram
On 10/07/15 10:19, Thierry Carrez wrote: Part of the confusion here is that we are not naming releases. We are naming release *cycles*. We are giving a name to a period of time, basically. In that period of time, various version numbers for various components will be released. Saying Glance

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack][cinder]A discussion about quota update lower than current usage.

2015-07-10 Thread hao wang
Hi, Duncan As Gorka said, we are trying not to impact default API behavior, just give a choice to client that it can restrict cloud admin to update quota lower than current usage. 2015-07-10 16:47 GMT+08:00 Duncan Thomas duncan.tho...@gmail.com: Ah, I apologise, I missed the but where it

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] [Taskflow]Review help to cinder bp:Implement function to manage/unmanage snapshots

2015-07-10 Thread hao wang
Sure, I have got this review link. :) 2015-07-10 16:10 GMT+08:00 Dulko, Michal michal.du...@intel.com: Feel free to start the work. Right now I’m working on c-vol’s create_volume flow. Review is there: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/193167/ *From:* hao wang

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][tests] Fix it friday! [mock failure in CI]

2015-07-10 Thread Kevin Benton
No prob. The fixes for Neutron were relatively trivial. https://review.openstack.org/#/c/200420/ The only one that was a bit surprising was the failure of autospec in this file: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/200420/4/neutron/tests/unit/services/metering/agents/test_metering_agent.py It was

[openstack-dev] Suggestion - github - Puppet-openstack repository.

2015-07-10 Thread cool dharma06
Hi all, i trying to install openstack with puppet. i saw two repositories are active related to puppet-openstack. i need some advice to go on with which repository. 1. https://github.com/stackforge/puppet-openstack-cloud 2. https://github.com/puppetlabs/puppetlabs-openstack i just confused

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][tests] Fix it friday! [mock failure in CI]

2015-07-10 Thread Sean Dague
I'm looking at Nova unit tests, there are at least 3 issues. The first one is assert_has_calls *used* to work with a single value m.assert_has_calls(foo) The documentation says m.assert_has_calls([foo]) is what you should use, but the other form used to work. That appears to be tightened up.

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Reading an updated port's fixed IPs in mech driver update_port_postcommit

2015-07-10 Thread Neil Jerram
Sorry to leave this unanswered. It happens every time (as far as we've tested so far). A pragmatic fix appears to be to explicitly requery the IPAllocation table, as you can see in the two commits here: https://github.com/Metaswitch/calico/commit/5512ce7dd50db414f161bddcef17b0846a1466ac

[openstack-dev] [all] [tests] Considering mock alternatives?

2015-07-10 Thread Dmitry Tantsur
Hi all, Recent breakage makes me finally raise the question that bothered me for some time: are there possible alternatives to mock library we could use? A couple reasons for that: 1. Devs don't seem to care about semver, backward compatibility and all this boring stuff. Releasing a minor

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [tests] Considering mock alternatives?

2015-07-10 Thread Robert Collins
On 10 July 2015 at 23:04, Dmitry Tantsur dtant...@redhat.com wrote: Hi all, Recent breakage makes me finally raise the question that bothered me for some time: are there possible alternatives to mock library we could use? There are. Personally, mock is probably about equal evil-wise to any

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [tests] Considering mock alternatives?

2015-07-10 Thread Robert Collins
On 10 July 2015 at 23:34, Dmitry Tantsur dtant...@redhat.com wrote: On 07/10/2015 01:13 PM, Robert Collins wrote: I see that a lot of code started breaking due to side_effect = Exception() no longer working. Which was a declared way for some time, at least to my best knowledge. And I do

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] wrong network for keystone endpoint in 6.1 ?

2015-07-10 Thread Vladimir Kuklin
Daniel Yes, if you want to do some administrative stuff you need to have access to management network to be able to work with internal and admin endpoints. On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 9:58 AM, Daniel Comnea comnea.d...@gmail.com wrote: I know about the flow but what i'm questioning is: admin

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Switching the bug status of ~200 bugs at once; Problem?

2015-07-10 Thread Sean Dague
On 07/10/2015 04:09 AM, Markus Zoeller wrote: I'd like to switch the status of ~200 bugs at once to adjust the bookkeeping in LaunchPad. This will concern Confirmed and Triaged bugs which have an assignee [1]. AFAIK they should be In Progress. I'm concerned if this would affect some reports

[openstack-dev] [neutron][qos] how we get back into master

2015-07-10 Thread Ihar Hrachyshka
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi all, as you probably know, QoS feature is on horizon for Liberty and uses a separate feature/qos branch. It's expected that after it's complete, the branch is merged back into master. Note that it will probably be the first (or the second, if

Re: [openstack-dev] [tox/pep8] different result between running tox and pep8

2015-07-10 Thread Jeremy Stanley
On 2015-07-10 03:15:08 + (+), Gareth wrote: My problem looks simple: Running tox -e pep8, the result says ok, not pep8 mistakes. Running pep8 ., a lot of pep8 mistkes come out. But in your project's tox.ini, there isn't such a long ignore list. So what makes this difference

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [tests] Considering mock alternatives?

2015-07-10 Thread Dmitry Tantsur
On 07/10/2015 02:00 PM, Robert Collins wrote: On 10 July 2015 at 23:34, Dmitry Tantsur dtant...@redhat.com wrote: On 07/10/2015 01:13 PM, Robert Collins wrote: I see that a lot of code started breaking due to side_effect = Exception() no longer working. Which was a declared way for some

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder]Restrict volume creation based on type

2015-07-10 Thread Erlon Cruz
Hi Eduard, What extra_specs do you configured in this volume_type? Yes you can force a volume to an specific node, or backend. You must configure the volume_backend_name on cinder.conf, and add an extra spec volume_backend_name='same_as_in_cinder_conf' on the volume type you created. For

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][tests] Fix it friday! [mock failure in CI]

2015-07-10 Thread Robert Collins
On 10 July 2015 at 22:07, Kevin Benton blak...@gmail.com wrote: No prob. The fixes for Neutron were relatively trivial. https://review.openstack.org/#/c/200420/ The only one that was a bit surprising was the failure of autospec in this file:

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] New Criteria for UX bugs

2015-07-10 Thread Jay Pipes
On 07/09/2015 06:14 PM, Andrew Woodward wrote: We often have bugs which create really poor User eXperience (UX) but our current bug priority criteria prevent nearly all of them from being higher than medium (as they nearly always have workarounds). We need to identify what should qualify as a

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][tests] Fix it friday! [mock failure in CI]

2015-07-10 Thread Sean Dague
On 07/10/2015 03:45 AM, Robert Collins wrote: Good news everybody, mock 1.1.0 is now out. This backports all the improvements over the last couple of years, making it fully synchronised with cPython master. Yay. Bad news. Lots of unit tests jobs have suffered falled from this. But - none

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][cinder][qa] encrypted volumes tests don't actually test encrypted volumes for most backends

2015-07-10 Thread Deepak Shetty
Thanks Mike for the heads up I fixed it for GlusterFS CI [1] Post the fix, glusterfs CI jobs are running fine [2] See Jul 10, 10:43 AM onwards thanx, deepak [1]: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/200399/2 [2]: https://jenkins07.openstack.org/job/check-tempest-dsvm-full-glusterfs-nv/ On Fri, Jul

Re: [openstack-dev] [tox/pep8] different result between running tox and pep8

2015-07-10 Thread Ihar Hrachyshka
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 07/10/2015 05:15 AM, Gareth wrote: Hi guys My problem looks simple: Running tox -e pep8, the result says ok, not pep8 mistakes. Running pep8 ., a lot of pep8 mistkes come out. But in your project's tox.ini, there isn't such a long

[openstack-dev] [Cinder] Quobyte CI Reporting, procedure for driver readdition

2015-07-10 Thread Silvan Kaiser
Hello Cinder Community! The Quobyte Cinder CI [1] is back reporting since tuesday late afternoon UTC. It is working stably with 8 test failing because of a Nova [2] and a Driver/Cinder bug [3]. Result logs can be reviewed at [4] (FYI: these also contain sandbox test logs). Over the last weekend

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][tests][swift] Fix it friday! [mock failure in CI] - fix for Swift

2015-07-10 Thread Victor Stinner
Here is a fix for Swift: https://review.openstack.org/200474 Victor On 10/07/2015 09:45, Robert Collins wrote: Good news everybody, mock 1.1.0 is now out. This backports all the improvements over the last couple of years, making it fully synchronised with cPython master. Yay. Bad news. Lots

Re: [openstack-dev] [tox/pep8] different result between running tox and pep8

2015-07-10 Thread Andrey Kurilin
Running pep8 ., a lot of pep8 mistkes come out. 1) `pep8 .` checks all files in directory(including build files, envs and etc). 2) `pep8 .` doesn't use tox.ini file, which can contain list of ignored rules. For example, it can looks like: [flake8] ignore = H703 3) Most of OpenStack projects use

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][tests] Fix it friday! [mock failure in CI]

2015-07-10 Thread Jeremy Stanley
On 2015-07-10 13:21:56 +0200 (+0200), Victor Stinner wrote: I see mock===1.0.1 in upper-constraints.txt, but the python27 check job of Swift was broken by the release of mock 1.1. Can someone please explain me why Swift check job failed? As far as I'm aware, only DevStack is making use of

[openstack-dev] [Murano] Versioning of Murano packages and MuranoPL classes

2015-07-10 Thread Alexander Tivelkov
Hi folks, Ability to manage multiple versions of application packages and their dependencies was always an important item in Murano roadmap, however we still don't have a clear spec for this feature. Yesterday we hosted a small design session to come up with a plan on what can be done in Liberty

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Switching the bug status of ~200 bugs at once; Problem?

2015-07-10 Thread Gary Kotton
+1 On 7/10/15, 1:32 PM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote: On 07/10/2015 04:09 AM, Markus Zoeller wrote: I'd like to switch the status of ~200 bugs at once to adjust the bookkeeping in LaunchPad. This will concern Confirmed and Triaged bugs which have an assignee [1]. AFAIK they should be In

Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Tom Cammann for core

2015-07-10 Thread Steven Dake (stdake)
+1 welcome aboard Tom! Regards -steve On 7/9/15, 7:20 PM, Adrian Otto adrian.o...@rackspace.com wrote: Team, Tom Cammann (tcammann) has become a valued Magnum contributor, and consistent reviewer helping us to shape the direction and quality of our new contributions. I nominate Tom to join

Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Tom Cammann for core

2015-07-10 Thread Hongbin Lu
+1 Welcome Tom! -Original Message- From: Adrian Otto [mailto:adrian.o...@rackspace.com] Sent: July-09-15 10:21 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List Subject: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Tom Cammann for core Team, Tom Cammann (tcammann) has become a valued Magnum contributor, and

Re: [openstack-dev] [testing] moving testrepository *outside* the tox venv

2015-07-10 Thread Ian Cordasco
On 7/10/15, 18:34, Monty Taylor mord...@inaugust.com wrote: On 07/10/2015 07:19 PM, Robert Collins wrote: On 10 July 2015 at 01:59, Morgan Fainberg morgan.fainb...@gmail.com wrote: Or a database per python major version (or at least gracefully handle the incompatibility). So that would

Re: [openstack-dev] [testing] moving testrepository *outside* the tox venv

2015-07-10 Thread Robert Collins
On 9 July 2015 at 18:34, Flavio Percoco fla...@redhat.com wrote: On 08/07/15 22:52 +, Jeremy Stanley wrote: On 2015-07-09 10:37:17 +1200 (+1200), Robert Collins wrote: So - I'm looking to: A) have a discussion and identify any issues with moving testr out of the venvs. (Note: this

Re: [openstack-dev] [testing] moving testrepository *outside* the tox venv

2015-07-10 Thread Monty Taylor
On 07/10/2015 07:19 PM, Robert Collins wrote: On 10 July 2015 at 01:59, Morgan Fainberg morgan.fainb...@gmail.com wrote: Or a database per python major version (or at least gracefully handle the incompatibility). So that would partition the data, and the whole point of test *repository* is

Re: [openstack-dev] [testing] moving testrepository *outside* the tox venv

2015-07-10 Thread Matthew Treinish
On Sat, Jul 11, 2015 at 11:35:16AM +1200, Robert Collins wrote: On 9 July 2015 at 10:52, Jeremy Stanley fu...@yuggoth.org wrote: On 2015-07-09 10:37:17 +1200 (+1200), Robert Collins wrote: So - I'm looking to: A) have a discussion and identify any issues with moving testr out of the

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] adding new vendor driver to upstream

2015-07-10 Thread Vadivel Poonathan
Hi Armando, Thanks for the pointer. I will go thru the same and get back to you/group, in case of any clarification. Here is the outdated wiki pages that i came across... these may have to be updated/cleaned-up to reflect the recent changes about development/contribution of new vendor

Re: [openstack-dev] [testing] moving testrepository *outside* the tox venv

2015-07-10 Thread Robert Collins
On 11 July 2015 at 11:34, Monty Taylor mord...@inaugust.com wrote: On 07/10/2015 07:19 PM, Robert Collins wrote: On 10 July 2015 at 01:59, Morgan Fainberg morgan.fainb...@gmail.com wrote: Or a database per python major version (or at least gracefully handle the incompatibility). So that

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] adding new vendor driver to upstream

2015-07-10 Thread Armando M.
On 10 July 2015 at 16:01, Vadivel Poonathan vadivel.openst...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I have a Neutron plugin (actually a mechanism_driver under ML2) developed for Alcatel-Lucent Omniswitches and is currently being used. But it is not part of Neutron upstream, nor listed in the docs/wiki

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack][cinder]A discussion about quota update lower than current usage.

2015-07-10 Thread Mike Perez
On 12:30 Jul 10, hao wang wrote: Cinder now doesn't check the existing resource when user lower the quota. It's reasonable for admin can adjust the quota limit to lower level than current usage. But it also bring confusion that I have received to end user, they saw the current usage was more

Re: [openstack-dev] [testing] moving testrepository *outside* the tox venv

2015-07-10 Thread Robert Collins
On 9 July 2015 at 10:52, Jeremy Stanley fu...@yuggoth.org wrote: On 2015-07-09 10:37:17 +1200 (+1200), Robert Collins wrote: So - I'm looking to: A) have a discussion and identify any issues with moving testr out of the venvs. (Note: this doesn't mean stop using it, just removing it from

Re: [openstack-dev] [testing] moving testrepository *outside* the tox venv

2015-07-10 Thread Matthew Treinish
On Thu, Jul 09, 2015 at 06:59:44AM -0700, Morgan Fainberg wrote: Or a database per python major version (or at least gracefully handle the incompatibility). --Morgan Sent via mobile On Jul 9, 2015, at 06:43, Doug Hellmann d...@doughellmann.com wrote: Excerpts from Robert Collins's

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] Why does Glance keep the deleted membership of image ?

2015-07-10 Thread Nikhil Komawar
Response inline. I can't understand how the impact on performance, image-members still have an idx. Is there any other concern on the patch ? How to get result from rally gate job ? Can you give me suggestion on how to move forward ? Thanks . Your change isn't. But including deleted is

Re: [openstack-dev] [Murano] Versioning of Murano packages and MuranoPL classes

2015-07-10 Thread Georgy Okrokvertskhov
Hi Alex, Thank you for the great summary. I have a concern about item #8. Can we add an option to Murano to use previous storage engine rather then Glance v3? We need to make sure that v3 API in Glance is set by default before we do a hard dependency on it in Murano. Thanks Gosha On Fri, Jul

Re: [openstack-dev] [manila][devstack] xtrace in devstack plugin

2015-07-10 Thread Valeriy Ponomaryov
Hello Emmanuel, There is no strong reason to keep it disabled. Thanks for pointing this out. I agree that it is better to have enabled. So, I already did a change for it - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/200585/ Regards, Valeriy Ponomaryov On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 12:10 PM, Emmanuel Cazenave

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] wrong network for keystone endpoint in 6.1 ?

2015-07-10 Thread Vladimir Kuklin
Dani You are always welcome - I am adding fuel documentation team into the thread. On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 5:45 PM, Daniel Comnea comnea.d...@gmail.com wrote: Okay Vladimir, thanks for confirmation! So then you happy to stick my sketch proposal (of course needs re-wording) into

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Separate repo for Fuel Agent

2015-07-10 Thread Vladimir Kozhukalov
Guys, we are next to moving fuel_agent directory into a separate repository. Action flow is going to be as follows: 1) Create verify jobs on our CI https://review.fuel-infra.org/#/c/9186 (DONE) 2) Freeze fuel_agent directory in https://github.com/stackforge/fuel-web (will announce in a separate

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] python-cinderclient functional tests

2015-07-10 Thread Ivan Kolodyazhny
Hi Mike, Unfortunately, we don't get a lot of stats [1] because we don't run it often. I've added 'check experimental' comment to latest python-cinderclient review request to get more stats. Review request to make this voting: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/200522/ [1]

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][nova-docker] docker environment variables and error handling

2015-07-10 Thread Federico Michele Facca
hi, trying to add a little of context to the request of daniel :) we are playing with nova-docker, and we realized that 1) it's unclear (or not supported) passing enviroment variable through userdata. probably the current version of IBM Cloud Manager with OpenStack V4.3 indeed does implement a

Re: [openstack-dev] [murano] [congress] Congress needs to fetch environments from all tenants.

2015-07-10 Thread Dolph Mathews
How about using domain-based role assignments in keystone and requiring domain-level authorization in policy, and then only returning data about the collection of tenants that belong to the authorized domain? That way you don't have an API that violates multi-tenant isolation, consumable only by

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] Why does Glance keep the deleted membership of image ?

2015-07-10 Thread Long Quan Sha
I can't understand how the impact on performance, image-members still have an idx. Is there any other concern on the patch ? How to get result from rally gate job ? Can you give me suggestion on how to move forward ? Thanks . Best regards, LongQuan From: Nikhil Komawar

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] New Neutron subproject for a Neutron backed Docker remote networking driver

2015-07-10 Thread Gurucharan Shetty
On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 8:16 AM, Gurucharan Shetty shet...@nicira.com wrote: From a 2 min look, this seems to wrap docker commands instead of using the new plugin The plugin is here: https://github.com/shettyg/ovn-docker/blob/master/ovn-docker-overlay-driver I would very much welcome to

Re: [openstack-dev] [Sahara] Questions about how Sahara use trust ?

2015-07-10 Thread Andrew Lazarev
Hi Chen, As I remember, proxy users were added for security reasons. When one user creates cluster in Sahara he should not get access to data of other users. Thanks, Andrew. On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 11:12 PM, Li, Chen chen...@intel.com wrote: Hi Sahara guys, When sahara create a

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][tests] Fix it friday! [mock failure in CI]

2015-07-10 Thread Victor Stinner
On 10/07/2015 10:42, Robert Collins wrote: Releasing this on a Friday sounds like bad timing, especially without advance notice that we'd have to rush to fix the dozens of new issues it would expose. There would never be a good time to release such things. The whole point of the constraints

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [tests] Considering mock alternatives?

2015-07-10 Thread Dmitry Tantsur
On 07/10/2015 01:13 PM, Robert Collins wrote: On 10 July 2015 at 23:04, Dmitry Tantsur dtant...@redhat.com wrote: Hi all, Recent breakage makes me finally raise the question that bothered me for some time: are there possible alternatives to mock library we could use? There are. Personally,

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][tests] Fix it friday! [mock failure in CI]

2015-07-10 Thread Jeremy Stanley
On 2015-07-10 19:45:10 +1200 (+1200), Robert Collins wrote: [...] Python 2.6 support was dropped in 1.1.0, so we need to use markers to select 1.0.1 for the remaining 2.6 gate jobs. (We should kill those of asap). [...] Unless we convince ourselves it's worthwhile to EOL Juno early, we can't

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Switching the bug status of ~200 bugs at once; Problem?

2015-07-10 Thread Sean Dague
On 07/10/2015 09:34 AM, Markus Zoeller wrote: Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote on 07/10/2015 12:32:00 PM: From: Sean Dague s...@dague.net To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Date: 07/10/2015 12:32 PM Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Switching the bug status of ~200 bugs at once;

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] Why does Glance keep the deleted membership of image ?

2015-07-10 Thread Nikhil Komawar
Please find the response inline. Hi Glance experts, I'd like to send this mail again, hope I can get help and suggest from glance experts. The question is from a bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/glance/+bug/1462315, If an image-member is deleted, then create it again with the same

Re: [openstack-dev] [Murano] Documentation on how to Start Contributing

2015-07-10 Thread Georgy Okrokvertskhov
Hi, If I understand correctly, you want to be able to install modified Murano from your own repository. There is a devstack integration script in Murano repository which does this. Here are lines where you can point to specific repository for Murano installation in devstack:

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] python-cinderclient functional tests

2015-07-10 Thread Ivan Kolodyazhny
On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 4:28 PM, Ivan Kolodyazhny e...@e0ne.info wrote: Review request to make this voting I'm sorry for typo. Of course, it's a review request to make this job non-voting in check queue. Regards, Ivan Kolodyazhny

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel][Fuel-library] Using librarian-puppet to manage upstream fuel-library modules

2015-07-10 Thread Alex Schultz
Done. Sorry about that. -Alex On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 9:22 AM, Simon Pasquier spasqu...@mirantis.com wrote: Alex, could you enable the comments for all on your document? Thanks! Simon On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 11:07 AM, Bogdan Dobrelya bdobre...@mirantis.com wrote: Hello everyone, I

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] wrong network for keystone endpoint in 6.1 ?

2015-07-10 Thread Daniel Comnea
Okay Vladimir, thanks for confirmation! So then you happy to stick my sketch proposal (of course needs re-wording) into documentation? Dani On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 11:31 AM, Vladimir Kuklin vkuk...@mirantis.com wrote: Daniel Yes, if you want to do some administrative stuff you need to have

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Switching the bug status of ~200 bugs at once; Problem?

2015-07-10 Thread Thierry Carrez
Markus Zoeller wrote: The bugs I'm referring to are *not* set to In Progress but have an assignee. I think this is an inconsistency which I try to resolve. I can treat them like In Progress bugs and remove the assignee if there is no activity in the last 60 days. Is this what you say? So you

Re: [openstack-dev] Suggestion - github - Puppet-openstack repository.

2015-07-10 Thread Emilien Macchi
On 07/10/2015 09:05 AM, cool dharma06 wrote: Hi all, i trying to install openstack with puppet. i saw two repositories are active related to puppet-openstack. i need some advice to go on with which repository. 1. https://github.com/stackforge/puppet-openstack-cloud I personally know

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Switching the bug status of ~200 bugs at once; Problem?

2015-07-10 Thread Markus Zoeller
Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote on 07/10/2015 12:32:00 PM: From: Sean Dague s...@dague.net To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Date: 07/10/2015 12:32 PM Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Switching the bug status of ~200 bugs at once; Problem? On 07/10/2015 04:09 AM, Markus Zoeller

[openstack-dev] [Cinder]Cinder services issues after add/remove/add driver

2015-07-10 Thread Eduard Matei
Hi, Potential bug, but still investigating: - configured a driver on cinder (besides lvm) - all ok [service1] volume_driver = cinder.volume.drivers.openvstorage.OVSVolumeDriver volume_backend_name = service1 vpool_name = service1 - removed it, restarted services - all ok (cinder service-list

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel][Fuel-library] Using librarian-puppet to manage upstream fuel-library modules

2015-07-10 Thread Simon Pasquier
Alex, could you enable the comments for all on your document? Thanks! Simon On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 11:07 AM, Bogdan Dobrelya bdobre...@mirantis.com wrote: Hello everyone, I took some time this morning to write out a document[0] that outlines one possible ways for us to manage our

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Friday July 10 is Nova's non-priority feature review bash day

2015-07-10 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 7/7/2015 12:35 PM, John Garbutt wrote: Hi, Friday is: non-priority feature review bash day https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Nova/Liberty_Release_Schedule#Dates_overview The idea is the whole nova community is invited to concentrate on reviewing some some of the low priority blueprints that

[openstack-dev] [neutron][lbaas] Horizon support for neutron-lbaas v2

2015-07-10 Thread Eichberger, German
Hi Vivek, Hope things are well. With the Midccyle next week I am wondering if you made any progress and/or how we can best help with the panels. Thanks, German From: Jain, Vivek vivekj...@ebay.commailto:vivekj...@ebay.com Reply-To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)

[openstack-dev] [neutron][qos] Priorities Status for QoS

2015-07-10 Thread Miguel Angel Ajo
I've been working on assembling a QoS[1] POC since last day of the coding sprint in Israel [2], Ihar has reported to the list our plan to get into master [3]. I've been able to validate and integrate lots of the patches, and find the gaps, while still finishing the top-down assembly may

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel][Fuel-Packaging][Fuel-CI][Fuel-Infra] How to Deal with CI Failures Induced by Libraries Requirements Drift

2015-07-10 Thread Dmitry Borodaenko
Vladimir, You have identified the root cause of the problem: The key issue here is that our CI tests are using some code not from packages of particular releases, but from other sources, e.g. pypi for python. Using frozen pypi, rubygems, nodejs and other language specific package mirrors is a

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Switching the bug status of ~200 bugs at once; Problem?

2015-07-10 Thread Markus Zoeller
Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.org wrote on 07/10/2015 03:43:06 PM: From: Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.org To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Date: 07/10/2015 03:43 PM Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Switching the bug status of ~200 bugs at once; Problem? Markus Zoeller

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][tests] Fix it friday! [mock failure in CI]

2015-07-10 Thread Victor Stinner
Le 10/07/2015 13:39, Jeremy Stanley a écrit : On 2015-07-10 13:21:56 +0200 (+0200), Victor Stinner wrote: I see mock===1.0.1 in upper-constraints.txt, but the python27 check job of Swift was broken by the release of mock 1.1. Can someone please explain me why Swift check job failed? As far

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Fuel library CI changes due to transition to Kilo

2015-07-10 Thread Aleksandra Fedorova
Hi everyone, latest Fuel Library CI update: * Currently we have two tests based on Kilo ISO enabled in voting mode: - master.fuel-library.pkgs.ubuntu.ha_neutron_vlan - fuellib_review_pkgs_master_node Both run Ubuntu deployment and pass on current master (see [1] and [2]). Note that you need

[openstack-dev] [neutron][lbaas] Radware unit test issues

2015-07-10 Thread Brandon Logan
python's mock library had an update yesterday that exposed some issues with unit tests that are using the mock assert calls. The radware tests were using a method called assert_called_once, which actually is not a real assert method off a mock. assert_called_once_with is, though. However,

Re: [openstack-dev] [murano] [congress] Congress needs to fetch environments from all tenants.

2015-07-10 Thread Tim Hinrichs
We sometimes want the ability to write policy across tenants, e.g. VMs from Coke and Pepsi must always be deployed on different hosts. I didn't think there were any roles that could see everything without all_tenants=true. If there are such roles, I'd be happy to remove the all_tenants=true from

[openstack-dev] [Fuel][Fuel-Packaging][Fuel-CI][Fuel-Infra] How to Deal with CI Failures Induced by Libraries Requirements Drift

2015-07-10 Thread Vladimir Kuklin
Folks I am writing this email to discuss very important topic which appeared to be rather hot with several bugs associated with it. For example these ones: https://bugs.launchpad.net/fuel/+bug/1472018 https://bugs.launchpad.net/fuel/+bug/1468053 There were several fixes applied. One of them was

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Separate repo for Fuel Agent

2015-07-10 Thread Vladimir Kozhukalov
Ok, guys. Looks like there are no any objections. At the moment I need to create actual version of upstream repository which is going to be sucked in by OpenStack Infra. Please, be informed that all patches changing fuel-web/fuel_agent that will be merged after this moment will need to be ported

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][tests] Fix it friday! [mock failure in CI]

2015-07-10 Thread Jeremy Stanley
On 2015-07-10 18:15:18 +0200 (+0200), Victor Stinner wrote: Is there a plan to use pinned versions on other gates to avoid similar issues in the future? (Decide when we upgrade a dependency) Sachi has a design underway for applying constraints files to tox envs as well:

  1   2   >