[openstack-dev] [fuel] Plan to implement the OpenStack Testing Interface for Fuel

2015-07-18 Thread Dmitry Borodaenko
One of the requirements for all OpenStack projects is to use the same Testing Interface [0]. In response to the Fuel application [1], the Technical Committee has clarified that this includes running gate jobs on the OpenStack Infrastructure [2][3]. [0]

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] Request for spec freeze execption

2015-07-18 Thread Morgan Fainberg
This is a relatively small scope of change and seems to be worth including in Liberty. I'm ok with this exception is there are no other red flags from the core team. Sent via mobile On Jul 17, 2015, at 11:15, Henry Nash hen...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote: Hi Role assignment inheritance

Re: [openstack-dev] 7/17 state of the gate (you know, fires)

2015-07-18 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 7/18/2015 8:54 AM, Matt Riedemann wrote: On 7/17/2015 7:51 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: We started the day with a mock 1.1.4 release breaking unit tests for a few projects (nova, cinder, ironic at least). The nova blocker was tracked with bug 1475661. We got a g-r change up to block

Re: [openstack-dev] 7/17 state of the gate (you know, fires)

2015-07-18 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 7/17/2015 7:51 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: We started the day with a mock 1.1.4 release breaking unit tests for a few projects (nova, cinder, ironic at least). The nova blocker was tracked with bug 1475661. We got a g-r change up to block mock!=1.1.4 but that didn't fix the issue because

Re: [openstack-dev] [fuel][puppet] Managing upstream puppet modules in fuel-library under librarian

2015-07-18 Thread Jay Pipes
On 07/17/2015 11:27 PM, Dmitry Borodaenko wrote: One of the concerns raised by TC in response to the proposal to add Fuel to OpenStack Projects [0] is the fact that fuel-library includes copies of upstream Puppet modules, most importantly from OpenStack Puppet [1]. [0]

Re: [openstack-dev] 7/17 state of the gate (you know, fires)

2015-07-18 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 7/18/2015 9:31 AM, Matt Riedemann wrote: On 7/18/2015 8:54 AM, Matt Riedemann wrote: On 7/17/2015 7:51 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: We started the day with a mock 1.1.4 release breaking unit tests for a few projects (nova, cinder, ironic at least). The nova blocker was tracked with bug

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel][Fuel-library] Using librarian-puppet to manage upstream fuel-library modules

2015-07-18 Thread Igor Kalnitsky
Sergii, It's not about tests, it's about how we want to retrieve upstream packages. Directly from Git? Or package them and add deps to our fuel-library package? Thanks, Igor On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 1:14 AM, Sergii Golovatiuk sgolovat...@mirantis.com wrote: Igor, There shouldn't be any

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Exposing provider networks in network_data.json

2015-07-18 Thread Sam Stoelinga
+1 on Kevin Benton's comments. Ironic should have integration with switches where the switches are SDN compatible. The individual bare metal node should not care which vlan, vxlan or other translation is programmed at the switch. The individual bare metal nodes just knows I have 2 nics and and

Re: [openstack-dev] [fuel][puppet] Managing upstream puppet modules in fuel-library under librarian

2015-07-18 Thread Davanum Srinivas
Dmitry, +1 to full migration to librarian a blocker requirement for Fuel 8.0. thanks, dims On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 11:27 PM, Dmitry Borodaenko dborodae...@mirantis.com wrote: One of the concerns raised by TC in response to the proposal to add Fuel to OpenStack Projects [0] is the fact that

Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum][bp] Power Magnum to run on metal with Hyper

2015-07-18 Thread Hongbin Lu
Peng, Several questions Here. You mentioned that HyperStack is a single big “bay”. Then, who is doing the multi-host scheduling, Hyper or something else? Were you suggesting to integrate Hyper with Magnum directly? Or you were suggesting to integrate Hyper with Magnum indirectly (i.e. through

Re: [openstack-dev] [fuel] Plan to implement the OpenStack Testing Interface for Fuel

2015-07-18 Thread Boris Pavlovic
Dmitry, Am I missing any major risks or additional requirements here? Syncing requirements with global openstack requirements can produce issues, that requires changes in code. I would strongly recommend to sync requirements by hand and test everything before starting splitting repos and

[openstack-dev] [fuel][puppet] The state of collaboration: 5 weeks

2015-07-18 Thread Dmitry Borodaenko
It has been 5 weeks since Emilien has asked Fuel developers to contribute more actively to Puppet OpenStack project [0]. We had a lively discussion on openstack-dev, myself and other Fuel developers proposed some concrete steps that could be done to reconcile the two projects, the whole thread

Re: [openstack-dev] 7/17 state of the gate (you know, fires)

2015-07-18 Thread Louis Taylor
On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 07:51:35PM -0500, Matt Riedemann wrote: We started the day with a mock 1.1.4 release breaking unit tests for a few projects (nova, cinder, ironic at least). The nova blocker was tracked with bug 1475661. We got a g-r change up to block mock!=1.1.4 but that didn't

Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Magnum template manage use platform VS others as a type?

2015-07-18 Thread Steven Dake (stdake)
From: Adrian Otto adrian.o...@rackspace.commailto:adrian.o...@rackspace.com Reply-To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) openstack-dev@lists.openstack.orgmailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Date: Thursday, July 16, 2015 at 12:35 PM To: OpenStack Development

Re: [openstack-dev] 7/17 state of the gate (you know, fires)

2015-07-18 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 7/18/2015 10:48 AM, Louis Taylor wrote: On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 07:51:35PM -0500, Matt Riedemann wrote: We started the day with a mock 1.1.4 release breaking unit tests for a few projects (nova, cinder, ironic at least). The nova blocker was tracked with bug 1475661. We got a g-r change

Re: [openstack-dev] [CI] How to set a proxy for zuul.

2015-07-18 Thread Asselin, Ramy
HI Tang, I just pushed the file [1]. Please read the migration instructions in the README.md. Let me know of any issues [2]. [1] https://github.com/rasselin/os-ext-testing/commit/9b39bb3c9a3532e753763d5e65241eeff2a20a06 [2] https://github.com/rasselin/os-ext-testing/issues/new Thanks, Ramy

Re: [openstack-dev] [CI] How to set a proxy for zuul.

2015-07-18 Thread Asselin, Ramy
HI Abhi Tang, Sorry I missed this thread. Let me know if you’ve resolved your issues. My repo is undergoing migrations to reuse components in openstack-infra/puppet-openstackci. For single-use-nodes, the file you need has been removed here [1]: But I see now that it is still needed, or a

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-infra] [CI] [tempest] Tempest tests failing with SSH timeout.

2015-07-18 Thread Asselin, Ramy
We ran into this issue as well. I never found the root cause, but I found a work-around: Use neutron-networking instead of the default nova-networking. If you’re using devstack-gate, it’s as simple as: export DEVSTACK_GATE_NEUTRON=1 Then run the job as usual. Ramy From: Abhishek Shrivastava

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron]How to configure lbaas api v2 on devstack?

2015-07-18 Thread Al Miller
The quick answer is “enable_service q-lbaasv2”. A longer answer is that the neutron-lbaas repository contains sample local.con and local.sh files that set up a working loadbalancer devstack setup using LBaaS V2. They are in neutron-lbaas/devstack/samples. Putting those files, along with

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron]How to configure lbaas api v2 on devstack?

2015-07-18 Thread Al Miller
The quick answer is “enable_service q-lbaasv2”. A longer answer is that the neutron-lbaas repository contains sample local.con and local.sh files that set up a working loadbalancer devstack setup using LBaaS V2. They are in neutron-lbaas/devstack/samples. Putting those files, along with

Re: [openstack-dev] Barbican : Unable to store the secret when Barbican was Integrated with SafeNet HSM

2015-07-18 Thread John Vrbanac
Asha, It looks like you don't have your mkek label correctly configured. Make sure that the mkek_label and hmac_label values in your config correctly reflect the keys that you've generated on your HSM. The plugin will cache the key handle to the mkek and hmac when the plugin starts, so if it

Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum][bp] Power Magnum to run on metalwith Hyper

2015-07-18 Thread Jay Lau
Thanks Adrian, I think that we are on same page for this: Using nova ironic drive to provision hyper machines as bay. ;-) In my previous email, I also mentioned two integration proposals with assumption of using ironic driver provision those hyper machines. 1) Once Hyper and k8s integration

Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum][bp] Power Magnum to run on metal with Hyper

2015-07-18 Thread Jay Lau
Hi Peng, Please check some of my understandings in line. Thanks 2015-07-18 0:33 GMT+08:00 Peng Zhao p...@hyper.sh: Hi, Adrian, Jay and all, There could be a much longer version of this, but let me try to explain in a minimalist way. Bay currently has two modes: VM-based, BM-based. In

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack][cinder]A discussion about quota update lower than current usage.

2015-07-18 Thread hao wang
hi Duncan Sorry for the long delay. IMHO, the purpose of this change is let the cinder have ability to control admin's action. If admin only want to limit the users not to create resources any more, fine, use the option argument 'skip_validation=False to update the quota limit and just equal the

[openstack-dev] Barbican : Unable to store the secret when Barbican was Integrated with SafeNet HSM

2015-07-18 Thread Asha Seshagiri
Hi All , I have configured Barbican to integrate with SafeNet HSM. Installed safenet client libraries , registered the barbican machine to point to HSM server and also assigned HSM partition. The following were the changes done in barbican.conf file # = Secret Store Plugin

[openstack-dev] [cinder]Question for availability_zone of cinder

2015-07-18 Thread hao wang
Hi stackers, I found now cinder only can configure one storage_availability_zone for cinder-volume. If using multi-backend in one cinder-volume node, could we have different AZ for each backend? So that we can specify each backend as a AZ and create volume in this AZ. Regards, Wang Hao

Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum][bp] Power Magnum to run on metal with Hyper

2015-07-18 Thread Jay Lau
Hong Bin, I have some online discussion with Peng, seems hyper is now integrating with Kubernetes and also have plan integrate with mesos for scheduling. Once mesos integration finished, we can treat mesos+hyper as another kind of bay. Thanks 2015-07-19 4:15 GMT+08:00 Hongbin Lu

[openstack-dev] [Neutron]How to configure lbaas api v2 on devstack?

2015-07-18 Thread ????
Hi all, To enable lbaas on devstack with haproxy, I added `enabled_service q-lbaas` in devstack/loacl.conf. ButI find that lbaas api is v1, which means I could use `neutron lb-xxx` instead of `neutron lbaas-xxx`. If I want to use api v2, what should I do with devstack/local.conf? Wilence