Re: [openstack-dev] [Congress] meeting time change

2015-08-02 Thread Rui Chen
Convert to Asia timezone, the new time is easy to remember for us :) For CST (UTC+8:00): Thursday 08:00 AM For JST (UTC+9:00): Thursday 09:00 AM http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?iso=20150806T00p1=1440 2015-08-01 1:20 GMT+08:00 Tim Hinrichs t...@styra.com: Peter pointed

[openstack-dev] [Keystone][Fernet]multisite identity service management

2015-08-02 Thread joehuang
Hi, Glad to know you guys are talking about the key distribution and rotation for Fernet token. Hans and I did a prototype for multisite identity service management, and have a similar issue. The use case is : a user should, using a single authentication point be able to manage virtual

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] A possible solution for HA Active-Active

2015-08-02 Thread Joshua Harlow
Daniel Comnea wrote: From Operators point of view i'd love to see less technology proliferation in OpenStack, if you wear the developer hat please don't be selfish, take into account the others :) ZK is a robust technology but hey is a beast like Rabbit, there is a lot to massage and over 2

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] A possible solution for HA Active-Active

2015-08-02 Thread Morgan Fainberg
On Aug 1, 2015, at 09:51, Monty Taylor mord...@inaugust.com wrote: On 08/01/2015 03:40 AM, Mike Perez wrote: On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 8:56 AM, Joshua Harlow harlo...@outlook.com wrote: ...random thought here, skip as needed... in all honesty orchestration solutions like mesos

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] A possible solution for HA Active-Active

2015-08-02 Thread Daniel Comnea
From Operators point of view i'd love to see less technology proliferation in OpenStack, if you wear the developer hat please don't be selfish, take into account the others :) ZK is a robust technology but hey is a beast like Rabbit, there is a lot to massage and over 2 data centers ZK is not

[openstack-dev] [mistral] [murano] An online YAQL evaluator

2015-08-02 Thread ELISHA, Moshe (Moshe)
Hey, A couple of weeks ago we had a Python-oriented Hackathon at Alcatel-Lucent CloudBand. We divided into groups and each group had to think of an original / innovative / creative idea to be completed in 24 hours. My group decided to create an online YAQL evaluator. Although we did not win

Re: [openstack-dev] [mistral] [murano] An online YAQL evaluator

2015-08-02 Thread Nikolay Makhotkin
Hi guys! That's awesome! It is very useful for all us! -- Best Regards, Nikolay __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] A possible solution for HA Active-Active

2015-08-02 Thread Daniel Comnea
I couldn't put it better, nice write up Morgan!! +1 On Sun, Aug 2, 2015 at 10:28 AM, Morgan Fainberg morgan.fainb...@gmail.com wrote: On Aug 2, 2015, at 16:00, Daniel Comnea comnea.d...@gmail.com wrote: From Operators point of view i'd love to see less technology proliferation in

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] A possible solution for HA Active-Active

2015-08-02 Thread Morgan Fainberg
On Aug 2, 2015, at 16:00, Daniel Comnea comnea.d...@gmail.com wrote: From Operators point of view i'd love to see less technology proliferation in OpenStack, if you wear the developer hat please don't be selfish, take into account the others :) ZK is a robust technology but hey is a

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] A possible solution for HA Active-Active

2015-08-02 Thread Gorka Eguileor
On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 01:47:22AM -0700, Mike Perez wrote: On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 12:35 PM, Gorka Eguileor gegui...@redhat.com wrote: I know we've all been looking at the HA Active-Active problem in Cinder and trying our best to figure out possible solutions to the different issues, and

Re: [openstack-dev] [mistral] [murano] An online YAQL evaluator

2015-08-02 Thread Stan Lagun
Guys, this is awesome!!! Happy to see yaql gets attention. One more initiative that you may find interesting is https://review.openstack.org/#/c/159905/ This is an attempt to port yaql 1.0 from Python to JS so that the same can be done in browser Sincerely yours, Stan Lagun Principal Software

[openstack-dev] How should we expose host capabilities to the scheduler

2015-08-02 Thread Dugger, Donald D
As we discussed at the mid-cycle meetup there is a bit of an issue related to host capabilities. Currently, we are overloading the flavor extra_specs with a whole lot of meaning, including requirements for specific host capabilities. Although this has allowed some impressive extension

[openstack-dev] [nova-scheduler] Scheduler sub-group meeting - Agenda 8/3

2015-08-02 Thread Dugger, Donald D
Meeting on #openstack-meeting-alt at 1400 UTC (8:00AM MDT) 1) Liberty specs - https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/liberty-nova-priorities-tracking 2) CPU feature representation - follow up from the mid-cycle 3) Opens -- Don Dugger Censeo Toto nos in Kansa esse decisse. - D.

Re: [openstack-dev] [fuel] OS_SERVICE_TOKEN usage in Fuel

2015-08-02 Thread Adam Heczko
Agree that SERVICE_TOKEN usage eradication will be probably long standing process, but IMO radosgw should follow usual way of managing Openstack service interactions. Usually when service wants to integrate with OpenStack, an appropriate user with role admin is created. I believe that for radosgw

Re: [openstack-dev] [Keystone][Fernet] HA SQL backend for Fernet keys

2015-08-02 Thread David Medberry
Glad to see you weighed in on this. -d On Sat, Aug 1, 2015 at 3:50 PM, Matt Fischer m...@mattfischer.com wrote: Agree that you guys are way over thinking this. You don't need to rotate keys at exactly the same time, we do it in within a one or two hours typically based on how our regions are

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] encryption is not supported in ceph volume

2015-08-02 Thread Adam Heczko
Indeed, it works only for iSCSI Cinder backends. I believe there are at least two ways in which volume encryption for Ceph could be achieved: - by implementing encryption at librbd level (user space) - rewriting Ceph's Cinder plugin, to attach RBD images not through libvirt/librbd but for

[openstack-dev] [nova][oslo][policy] oslo.policy adoption in Nova.

2015-08-02 Thread Davanum Srinivas
Sean, Nova-cores, The following Nova review is stuck: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/198065/ What's the minimum features in oslo.policy that we have to add in oslo.policy to unblock that work? If we get Nova wants to put defaults in code working, is that enough for getting oslo.policy into

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][Kuryr] - Bringing Dockers networking to Neutron

2015-08-02 Thread Mohammad Banikazemi
Please note that the meeting will be held in #openstack-meeting-4 channel on Freenode starting this Monday August 3rd at 1500 UTC. The agenda and other related information will be kept at: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Kuryr Best, Mohammad From: Gal Sagie gal.sa...@gmail.com To:

[openstack-dev] [Magnum]horizontal scalability

2015-08-02 Thread 王华
Hi all, As discussed in the Vancouver Summit, we are going to drop the bay lock implementation. Instead, each conductor will call Heat concurrently and rely on heat for concurrency control. However, I think we need an approach for state convergence from heat to magnum. Either periodic task [1] or