Re: [openstack-dev] How should we expose host capabilities to the scheduler

2015-08-03 Thread Alexis Lee
Dugger, Donald D said on Mon, Aug 03, 2015 at 05:39:49AM +: Also note that, although many capabilities can be represented by simple key/value pairs (e.g. the presence of a specific special instruction) that is not true for all capabilities (e.g. Numa topology doesn't really fit into this

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] Quobyte Cinder Driver revert?

2015-08-03 Thread Mike Perez
On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 9:11 AM, Duncan Thomas duncan.tho...@gmail.com wrote: It was discussed on the mailing list, and at the weekly meeting. Mike had had no response on the issue from the listed contact email, and the CI was reporting failure for every patch for two months On 3 Jul 2015

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] A possible solution for HA Active-Active

2015-08-03 Thread Joshua Harlow
Morgan Fainberg wrote: Lets step back away from tooz. Tooz for the sake of this conversation is as much the same as saying zookeeper or consul or etcd, etc. We should be focused (as both Flavio and Thierry said) on if we need DLM and what it will solve. So IMHO part of the problem with just

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Need volunteers to test coverage 4.0 alpha release

2015-08-03 Thread Brant Knudson
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 6:32 AM, Doug Hellmann d...@doughellmann.com wrote: Do we have anyone willing to spend some time looking at the incompatibilities Ned mentions below to ensure that we have a smooth transition when 4.0 moves out of alpha? Doug Seems to work ok with keystone. There

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] A possible solution for HA Active-Active

2015-08-03 Thread Fox, Kevin M
+1. From: Flavio Percoco [fla...@redhat.com] Sent: Monday, August 03, 2015 12:30 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] A possible solution for HA Active-Active On 03/08/15 00:49

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] A possible solution for HA Active-Active

2015-08-03 Thread Joshua Harlow
Clint Byrum wrote: Excerpts from Gorka Eguileor's message of 2015-08-02 15:49:46 -0700: On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 01:47:22AM -0700, Mike Perez wrote: On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 12:35 PM, Gorka Eguileorgegui...@redhat.com wrote: I know we've all been looking at the HA Active-Active problem in

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] A possible solution for HA Active-Active

2015-08-03 Thread Fox, Kevin M
I'm usually for abstraction layers, but they don't always pay off very well due to catering to the lowest common denominator. Lets clearly define the problem space first. IFF the problem space can be fully implemented using Tooz, then lets do that. Then the operator can choose. If Tooz cant

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla] Mission change suggested by the TC for big tent

2015-08-03 Thread Steven Dake (stdake)
On 7/30/15, 4:26 PM, Doug Hellmann d...@doughellmann.com wrote: Excerpts from Steven Dake (stdake)'s message of 2015-07-30 15:27:15 +: On 7/29/15, 1:23 PM, Doug Hellmann d...@doughellmann.com wrote: Excerpts from Steven Dake (stdake)'s message of 2015-07-29 20:07:26 +: Doug

[openstack-dev] [Neutron] Common Base class for agents

2015-08-03 Thread Andreas Scheuring
Hi, I'm planning to add a new ml2 driver and agent to neutron supporting macvtap attachments [1]. Kyle already decided, that this code should land in the neutron tree [2]. The normal approach till now was to copy an existing agent code and modify accordingly, which lead to a lot of duplicated

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] A possible solution for HA Active-Active

2015-08-03 Thread Devananda van der Veen
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 8:41 AM Joshua Harlow harlo...@outlook.com wrote: Clint Byrum wrote: Excerpts from Gorka Eguileor's message of 2015-08-02 15:49:46 -0700: On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 01:47:22AM -0700, Mike Perez wrote: On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 12:35 PM, Gorka Eguileorgegui...@redhat.com

[openstack-dev] [Glance] Artifacts sub team meeting 08/03

2015-08-03 Thread Nikhil Komawar
Hi, We had a very low turnout to the above meeting today. Hence, we did a very short update and ended it. You may find more details here: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/glance_artifacts_sub_team/2015/glance_artifacts_sub_team.2015-08-03-14.10.html -- Thanks, Nikhil

Re: [openstack-dev] [Keystone][Fernet] HA SQL backend for Fernet keys

2015-08-03 Thread Vladimir Kuklin
Folks As Sergii G. already pointed out if you want this solution to work in production, you should provide common ways of synchronization between different processing entities. Otherwise your very simple one-script solution will be prone to errors such as race conditions and others. You need to

Re: [openstack-dev] [pbr] [stable] [infra] How to generate .Z version increments on stable/liberty commits

2015-08-03 Thread Jeremy Stanley
On 2015-08-03 14:46:51 +0200 (+0200), Thierry Carrez wrote: [...] In order to make this work, it looks like we'd require: * pbr changes so that it supports a mode where every commit on the branch increments .Z * infra changes to automatically push the corresponding tag when the commit is

Re: [openstack-dev] [stable] [infra] How to auto-generate stable release notes

2015-08-03 Thread Alexis Lee
Thierry Carrez said on Mon, Aug 03, 2015 at 02:57:39PM +0200: 1. we can maintain a Changelog document directly in the source code. Rather than being straightly backported from master, commits with significant changes would be amended to additionally modify that document. Wouldn't this cause a

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] A possible solution for HA Active-Active

2015-08-03 Thread Joshua Harlow
Devananda van der Veen wrote: On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 8:41 AM Joshua Harlow harlo...@outlook.com mailto:harlo...@outlook.com wrote: Clint Byrum wrote: Excerpts from Gorka Eguileor's message of 2015-08-02 15:49:46 -0700: On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 01:47:22AM -0700, Mike Perez

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][oslo][policy] oslo.policy adoption in Nova.

2015-08-03 Thread Sergey Vilgelm
If i understood correctly, the main difference is that the parse_rule function is a private now in the oslo.policy library, also Jeffrey Zhang has changed this function and put into nova.policy module. I offer remove this function from the nova and make a public in the oslo.policy. On Mon, Aug 3,

Re: [openstack-dev] [pbr] [stable] [infra] How to generate .Z version increments on stable/liberty commits

2015-08-03 Thread Thierry Carrez
Jeremy Stanley wrote: On 2015-08-03 14:46:51 +0200 (+0200), Thierry Carrez wrote: [...] In order to make this work, it looks like we'd require: * pbr changes so that it supports a mode where every commit on the branch increments .Z * infra changes to automatically push the corresponding

Re: [openstack-dev] Would people see a value in the cve-check-tool?

2015-08-03 Thread Adam Heczko
Hi Elena, the tool looks very interesting. Maybe try to spread out this proposal also through openstack-security@ ML. BTW, I can't find the wrapper mentioned - am I missing something? Regards, Adam On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 11:08 PM, Reshetova, Elena elena.reshet...@intel.com wrote: Hi, We

[openstack-dev] [keystone] policy issues when generating trusts with different clients

2015-08-03 Thread michael mccune
hi all, i am doing some work to change sahara to make greater use of keystoneclient.session.Session objects and i am running into a strange error when issuing the trusts. the crux of this issue is that when i create Client objects by passing all the parameters directly to the client, the

Re: [openstack-dev] How to use the log server in CI ?

2015-08-03 Thread Asselin, Ramy
BTW, I did update the documentation a bit to cover recent questions [1]. Let me know if I missed anything. Thanks, Ramy [1] https://github.com/rasselin/os-ext-testing/commit/0d8e4234c226273392391df3693292af43b1d2be From: Tang Chen [mailto:tangc...@cn.fujitsu.com] Sent: Monday, August 03,

Re: [openstack-dev] How to use the log server in CI ?

2015-08-03 Thread Tang Chen
On 08/04/2015 06:44 AM, Asselin, Ramy wrote: Hi Tang, Sorry the documentation on github is limited. I've been focusing on getting an upstream solution working, and that's where it belongs and should be maintained. I will take a quick look and add some tips as discussed in this thread. Of

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Common Base class for agents

2015-08-03 Thread Sean M. Collins
I hacked up the LB agent and the OVS agent over some coffee - to see if there are pieces that overlap. I believe there are - I'm hoping to extract some code from each agent, into a common class. It's very WIP but I'm hopeful that I'll be able to share some promising results soon.

[openstack-dev] [fuel][puppet] The state of collaboration: 7 weeks

2015-08-03 Thread Dmitry Borodaenko
Two weeks ago we had a discussion of where things stand in the collaboration between Fuel and Puppet OpenStack projects [0]. [0] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2015-July/069925.html Things that were good at that point: - number of proposed patch sets Things that needed

Re: [openstack-dev] How to use the log server in CI ?

2015-08-03 Thread Asselin, Ramy
Hi Tang, Sorry the documentation on github is limited. I’ve been focusing on getting an upstream solution working, and that’s where it belongs and should be maintained. I will take a quick look and add some tips as discussed in this thread. Of course if you have pull requests, I’m happy to

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Common Base class for agents

2015-08-03 Thread Carl Baldwin
I see this as two tasks: 1) A refactoring to share common code and 2) the addition of another agent following the pattern of the others. I'd prefer that the two tasks not be mixed in the same review because it makes it more difficult to review as I think Kevin eluded to. For me, either could be

Re: [openstack-dev] [Keystone][Fernet] HA SQL backend for Fernet keys

2015-08-03 Thread David Stanek
On Sat, Aug 1, 2015 at 8:03 PM, Boris Bobrov bbob...@mirantis.com wrote: On Sat, Aug 1, 2015 at 3:41 PM, Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com wrote: This too is overly complex and will cause failures. If you replace key 0, you will stop validating tokens that were encrypted with the old key 0.

Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum][blueprint] magnum-service-list

2015-08-03 Thread Kai Qiang Wu
Hi Suro and Jay, I checked discussion below, and I do believe we also need service-list(for just magnum-api and magnum-conductor), but not so emergent requirement. I also think service-list should not bind to k8s or swarm etc. (can use coe-service etc.) But I have more for below: 1) For k8s

[openstack-dev] [all] Does OpenStack need a common solution for DLM? (was: Re: [Cinder] A possible solution for HA Active-Active)

2015-08-03 Thread Flavio Percoco
On 03/08/15 19:48 +0200, Gorka Eguileor wrote: On Mon, Aug 03, 2015 at 03:42:48PM +, Fox, Kevin M wrote: I'm usually for abstraction layers, but they don't always pay off very well due to catering to the lowest common denominator. Lets clearly define the problem space first. IFF the

Re: [openstack-dev] [CI] Jenkins jobs are not executed when setting up a new CI system.

2015-08-03 Thread Asselin, Ramy
Hi Tang, I thought I replied about this earlier. There seems to be a regression running jobs directly on master, at least for newer versions of Jenkins. Running on a slave does work. Ramy From: Tang Chen [mailto:tangc...@cn.fujitsu.com] Sent: Monday, July 27, 2015 6:30 PM To:

Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum][blueprint] magnum-service-list

2015-08-03 Thread SURO
Thanks Jay/Kennan/Adrian for chiming in! From this, I conclude that we have enough consensus to have 'magnum service-list' and 'magnum coe-service-list' segregated. I will capture extract of this discussion at the blueprint and start implementation of the same. Kennan, I would request you

Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum][blueprint] magnum-service-list

2015-08-03 Thread Jay Lau
Hi Suro, Yes, I did not see a strong reason for adding service-list to show all of magnum system services, but it is nice to have. But I did see a strong reason to rename service-list to coe-service-list or others which might be more meaningful as I was often asked by someone why does magnum

Re: [openstack-dev] 答复: [CI] No image was created after running nodepoold -d $DAEMON_ARGS

2015-08-03 Thread Asselin, Ramy
Hi Xiexs, Definitely make sure you run nodepool commands as nodepool and not root: sudo su - nodepool Before starting nodepool on a fresh install, I usually manually build the image first as it is easier to debug issues: sudo su - nodepool nodepool image-build image-name Ramy -Original

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Does OpenStack need a common solution for DLM? (was: Re: [Cinder] A possible solution for HA Active-Active)

2015-08-03 Thread Mark Voelker
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On Aug 3, 2015, at 6:09 PM, Flavio Percoco fla...@redhat.com wrote: On 03/08/15 19:48 +0200, Gorka Eguileor wrote: On Mon, Aug 03, 2015 at 03:42:48PM +, Fox, Kevin M wrote: I'm usually for abstraction layers, but they don't always pay off very

Re: [openstack-dev] 答复: [CI] No image was created after running nodepoold -d $DAEMON_ARGS

2015-08-03 Thread Xie, Xianshan
Hi Ramy, Cc Wienand, Thanks to both of you and your suggestions help me solve this problem. It was really a permission issue: (debug info) +sha256sum --check - +grep: /opt/dib_cache/SHA256SUMS.ubuntu.trusty.amd64: Permission denied Here grep command run as nodepool, but the file was owned by

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][L3] [Large Deployments Team] Representing a networks connected by routers

2015-08-03 Thread Mike Dorman
I hope we can move this idea moving forward. I was disappointed to see the spec abandoned. Some of us from the large deployers group will be at the Ops Meetup. Will there be any representation from Neutron there that we could discuss with more? Thanks, Mike On 8/3/15, 12:27 PM, Carl

Re: [openstack-dev] [Magnum]horizontal scalability

2015-08-03 Thread Hongbin Lu
Adrian, If the reason to avoid leader election is because it is complicated and error prone, this argument may not be true. Leader election is complicated in a pure distributed system in which there is no centralized storage. However, Magnum has a centralized database, so it is possible to

Re: [openstack-dev] [CI]How to set proxy for nodepool

2015-08-03 Thread Asselin, Ramy
Hi Xiexs, You are using disk image builder (DIB), so make sure your proxy is set correctly also without the NODEPOOL_ prefix. Those NODEPOOL_ prefixed variables are what would be used when DIB is not used / when the script approach is used with nova/glance (nodepool image-update). I don’t

Re: [openstack-dev] [devstack][neutron] How to give nested VM access to outside network?

2015-08-03 Thread Rich Megginson
On 08/03/2015 10:07 PM, Rich Megginson wrote: I'm running devstack in a VM (Fedora 21 host, EL 7.1.x VM) with a static IP address (because dhcp was not working): cat /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0 EOF DEVICE=eth0 BOOTPROTO=static DHCPCLASS= HWADDR=$VM_MAC IPADDR=192.168.122.5

[openstack-dev] [CI]How to set proxy for nodepool

2015-08-03 Thread Xie, Xianshan
Hi All, When I ran “nodepool image-build image-name” to create a new image, I got this error message: … INFO nodepool.image.build.dpc: + sudo -H virtualenv /usr/zuul-swift-logs-env INFO nodepool.image.build.dpc: sudo: unable to resolve host fnst01 INFO nodepool.image.build.dpc: + sudo -H

Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum][blueprint] magnum-service-list

2015-08-03 Thread Jay Lau
Cool, Suro! It's great that we finally reach an agreement on this ;-) 2015-08-03 20:43 GMT-04:00 SURO suro.p...@gmail.com: Thanks Jay/Kennan/Adrian for chiming in! From this, I conclude that we have enough consensus to have 'magnum service-list' and 'magnum coe-service-list' segregated. I

[openstack-dev] [devstack][neutron] How to give nested VM access to outside network?

2015-08-03 Thread Rich Megginson
I'm running devstack in a VM (Fedora 21 host, EL 7.1.x VM) with a static IP address (because dhcp was not working): cat /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0 EOF DEVICE=eth0 BOOTPROTO=static DHCPCLASS= HWADDR=$VM_MAC IPADDR=192.168.122.5 NETMASK=255.255.255.0 GATEWAY=192.168.122.1

Re: [openstack-dev] [stable] [infra] How to auto-generate stable release notes

2015-08-03 Thread Joshua Harlow
Perhaps the following can be used? https://github.com/vaab/gitchangelog#gitchangelog That does impose a commit message format, but then any kind of release notes generated from a commit log will require some sort of standard to be maintained (otherwise it's going to be tough to auto-generate

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla] Mission change suggested by the TC for big tent

2015-08-03 Thread Martin André
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 5:47 PM, Steven Dake (stdake) std...@cisco.com wrote: On 7/30/15, 4:26 PM, Doug Hellmann d...@doughellmann.com wrote: Excerpts from Steven Dake (stdake)'s message of 2015-07-30 15:27:15 +: On 7/29/15, 1:23 PM, Doug Hellmann d...@doughellmann.com wrote:

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][oslo][policy] oslo.policy adoption in Nova.

2015-08-03 Thread Doug Hellmann
Excerpts from Doug Hellmann's message of 2015-08-03 16:19:31 -0400: Excerpts from Morgan Fainberg's message of 2015-08-04 06:05:56 +1000: On Aug 4, 2015, at 05:49, Doug Hellmann d...@doughellmann.com wrote: Excerpts from Sergey Vilgelm's message of 2015-08-03 22:11:50 +0300: On

[openstack-dev] [neutron][vpnaas] Next IRC meeting - Tuesday, August 4th.

2015-08-03 Thread Paul Michali
Will hold another meeting tomorrow. If you have items for the agenda, please update the Wiki. Regards, Paul Michali (pc_m) __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe:

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] A possible solution for HA Active-Active

2015-08-03 Thread Flavio Percoco
On 03/08/15 08:32 -0700, Joshua Harlow wrote: Morgan Fainberg wrote: Lets step back away from tooz. Tooz for the sake of this conversation is as much the same as saying zookeeper or consul or etcd, etc. We should be focused (as both Flavio and Thierry said) on if we need DLM and what it will

Re: [openstack-dev] [Keystone][Fernet] HA SQL backend for Fernet keys

2015-08-03 Thread Adam Heczko
Hi folks, we are discussing operations on sensitive data. May I ask you what security controls Pacemaker provides? How we could audit its operations and data it is accessing? The same question arises when discussing native Keystone solution. From the security perspective, reduction of attack

Re: [openstack-dev] [Keystone][Fernet] HA SQL backend for Fernet keys

2015-08-03 Thread Sergii Golovatiuk
Hi, -- Best regards, Sergii Golovatiuk, Skype #golserge IRC #holser On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 12:44 PM, Adam Heczko ahec...@mirantis.com wrote: Hi folks, we are discussing operations on sensitive data. May I ask you what security controls Pacemaker provides? Pacemaker doesn't exchange any

[openstack-dev] [tricircle] local pluggable cascaded service

2015-08-03 Thread joehuang
Hi, In the PoC, the status synchronization is done by the proxy node running with periodic task to poll the recent changed status, for example, VM status, volume status, and port status, etc. One proxy node will be responsible for one cascaded OpenStack instance, and configured with one user

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] A possible solution for HA Active-Active

2015-08-03 Thread Gorka Eguileor
On Mon, Aug 03, 2015 at 12:28:27AM -0700, Clint Byrum wrote: Excerpts from Gorka Eguileor's message of 2015-08-02 15:49:46 -0700: On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 01:47:22AM -0700, Mike Perez wrote: On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 12:35 PM, Gorka Eguileor gegui...@redhat.com wrote: I know we've all

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][oslo][policy] oslo.policy adoption in Nova.

2015-08-03 Thread Doug Hellmann
Excerpts from Davanum Srinivas (dims)'s message of 2015-08-02 21:16:32 -0400: Sean, Nova-cores, The following Nova review is stuck: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/198065/ What's the minimum features in oslo.policy that we have to add in oslo.policy to unblock that work? If we get

Re: [openstack-dev] [Keystone][Fernet] HA SQL backend for Fernet keys

2015-08-03 Thread Sergii Golovatiuk
Hi, I agree with Bogdan that key rotation procedure should be part of HA solution. If you make a simple script then this script will be a single point of failure. It requires operator's attention so it may lead to human errors also. Adding monitoring around it or expiration time is not a solution

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][oslo][policy] oslo.policy adoption in Nova.

2015-08-03 Thread Davanum Srinivas
Doug, All the features needed for Nova to work is present in oslo.policy (i.e. all features from old oslo-incubator copy is present in oslo.policy) -- dims On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 5:16 AM, Doug Hellmann d...@doughellmann.com wrote: Excerpts from Davanum Srinivas (dims)'s message of 2015-08-02

Re: [openstack-dev] [tricircle] local pluggable cascaded service

2015-08-03 Thread Vega Cai
Agree that we use polling mode to synchronize resource status, but it's a bit weird to deploy a localized service for just polling. Maybe we can define a status synchronizatioin task to handle such work so it can be done by cascade service itself. If multiple cascade service is deployed, to avoid

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] A possible solution for HA Active-Active

2015-08-03 Thread Flavio Percoco
On 03/08/15 00:49 +0200, Gorka Eguileor wrote: On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 01:47:22AM -0700, Mike Perez wrote: On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 12:35 PM, Gorka Eguileor gegui...@redhat.com wrote: I know we've all been looking at the HA Active-Active problem in Cinder and trying our best to figure out

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] A possible solution for HA Active-Active

2015-08-03 Thread Morgan Fainberg
Lets step back away from tooz. Tooz for the sake of this conversation is as much the same as saying zookeeper or consul or etcd, etc. We should be focused (as both Flavio and Thierry said) on if we need DLM and what it will solve. Once we have all of that defined, the use of an abstraction such

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] A possible solution for HA Active-Active

2015-08-03 Thread Clint Byrum
Excerpts from Gorka Eguileor's message of 2015-08-02 15:49:46 -0700: On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 01:47:22AM -0700, Mike Perez wrote: On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 12:35 PM, Gorka Eguileor gegui...@redhat.com wrote: I know we've all been looking at the HA Active-Active problem in Cinder and

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] A possible solution for HA Active-Active

2015-08-03 Thread Gorka Eguileor
On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 03:18:39PM -0700, Clint Byrum wrote: Excerpts from Mike Perez's message of 2015-07-31 10:40:04 -0700: On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 8:56 AM, Joshua Harlow harlo...@outlook.com wrote: ...random thought here, skip as needed... in all honesty orchestration solutions like

Re: [openstack-dev] Nova-database update

2015-08-03 Thread Pradeep Kiruvale
Hi Matt, Thanks for your reply. You mean to say what needs to be used for the scheduling ( CPUS, RAM, Storage etc ) has to be put into the Nova DB by implementing the APIs in every Nova compute server? These implementations acts as a nova-agents ? -Pradeep On 31 July 2015 at 18:03, Matt

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder][Ironic] A possible solution for HA Active-Active

2015-08-03 Thread Gorka Eguileor
On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 12:47:34PM -0700, Joshua Harlow wrote: Joshua Harlow wrote: Mike Perez wrote: On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 8:56 AM, Joshua Harlowharlo...@outlook.com wrote: ...random thought here, skip as needed... in all honesty orchestration solutions like mesos

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] A possible solution for HA Active-Active

2015-08-03 Thread Thierry Carrez
Flavio Percoco wrote: [...] So, to summarize, I love the effort behind this. But, as others have mentioned, I'd like us to take a step back, run this accross teams and come up with an opinonated solution that would work for everyone. Starting this discussion now would allow us to prepare

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] A possible solution for HA Active-Active

2015-08-03 Thread Gorka Eguileor
On Mon, Aug 03, 2015 at 10:22:42AM +0200, Thierry Carrez wrote: Flavio Percoco wrote: [...] So, to summarize, I love the effort behind this. But, as others have mentioned, I'd like us to take a step back, run this accross teams and come up with an opinonated solution that would work for

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] A possible solution for HA Active-Active

2015-08-03 Thread Julien Danjou
On Mon, Aug 03 2015, Thierry Carrez wrote: The last thing we want is to rush a solution that would only solve a particular project use case. Personally I'd like us to pick the simplest solution that can solve most of the use cases. Each of the solutions bring something to the table --

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] Additions and removals for the glance-drivers team

2015-08-03 Thread Nikhil Komawar
This has been implemented. Thanks all for participation. On 8/3/15 10:14 AM, Nikhil Komawar wrote: We asked Stuart personally during the recent Glance mid-cycle if he wanted to join and he said yes. Guess it's appropriate time for rotation now. On 8/1/15 11:44 PM, Flavio Percoco wrote: On

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][lbaas] Horizon support for neutron-lbaas v2

2015-08-03 Thread Jain, Vivek
For now, take this code and merge with exiting horizon setup (openstack_dashbord) and restart horizon. With that you will see loadbalancers_v2 panel on the left pane. Thanks, Vivek From: santosh sharma chitr.praya...@gmail.commailto:chitr.praya...@gmail.com Reply-To: OpenStack Development

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] encryption is not supported in ceph volume

2015-08-03 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 7/30/2015 1:02 AM, Li, Xiaoyan wrote: Hi all, I created an encryption type, and create a volume in Ceph with the volume type. cinder encryption-type-create But failed to attach it to a VM. The error message shows that no device_path in connection_info. ^[[01;31m2015-07-30 05:55:57.117

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] A possible solution for HA Active-Active

2015-08-03 Thread Clint Byrum
Excerpts from Devananda van der Veen's message of 2015-08-03 08:53:21 -0700: On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 8:41 AM Joshua Harlow harlo...@outlook.com wrote: Clint Byrum wrote: Excerpts from Gorka Eguileor's message of 2015-08-02 15:49:46 -0700: On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 01:47:22AM -0700, Mike

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-announce] [release][oslo] tooz release 1.21.0 (liberty)

2015-08-03 Thread Justin Hammond
FUCK OFF From: dava...@gmail.commailto:dava...@gmail.com dava...@gmail.commailto:dava...@gmail.com Reply-To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.orgmailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org openstack-dev@lists.openstack.orgmailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Date: Monday, August 3, 2015 at

[openstack-dev] [nova] Feature Freeze Exception Request

2015-08-03 Thread Sajeesh Cimson Sasi
Hello, I would like to request feature freeze exception for the implementation of Nested Quota Driver for Nova, which does the quota management of nested projects. Blueprint https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/nested-quota-driver-api

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][oslo][policy] oslo.policy adoption in Nova.

2015-08-03 Thread Doug Hellmann
Excerpts from Sergey Vilgelm's message of 2015-08-03 19:05:52 +0300: If i understood correctly, the main difference is that the parse_rule function is a private now in the oslo.policy library, also Jeffrey Zhang has changed this function and put into nova.policy module. I offer remove this

Re: [openstack-dev] [pbr] [stable] [infra] How to generate .Z version increments on stable/liberty commits

2015-08-03 Thread Robert Collins
On 4 August 2015 at 06:06, Doug Hellmann d...@doughellmann.com wrote: Excerpts from Thierry Carrez's message of 2015-08-03 18:11:53 +0200: Jeremy Stanley wrote: On 2015-08-03 14:46:51 +0200 (+0200), Thierry Carrez wrote: [...] In order to make this work, it looks like we'd require: *

Re: [openstack-dev] [stable] [infra] How to auto-generate stable release notes

2015-08-03 Thread Robert Collins
On 4 August 2015 at 02:46, Alexis Lee alex...@hp.com wrote: Thierry Carrez said on Mon, Aug 03, 2015 at 02:57:39PM +0200: 1. we can maintain a Changelog document directly in the source code. Rather than being straightly backported from master, commits with significant changes would be amended

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][oslo][policy] oslo.policy adoption in Nova.

2015-08-03 Thread Sergey Vilgelm
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 9:37 PM, Doug Hellmann d...@doughellmann.com wrote: Making that function public may be the most expedient fix, but the parser was made private for a reason, so before we expose it we should understand why, and if there are alternatives (such as creating a fixture in

Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum][blueprint] magnum-service-list

2015-08-03 Thread Adrian Otto
Jay makes a good point here. The service-list output is specific to the “service” abstraction in the COE, not the system services that are part of magnum. The suggested rename from service-list to coe-service-list would make this distinction more clear. Adrian On Jul 30, 2015, at 2:40 AM, Jay

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][L3] Representing a networks connected by routers

2015-08-03 Thread Carl Baldwin
Kevin, sorry for the delay in response. Keeping up on this thread was getting difficult while on vacation. tl;dr: I think it is worth it to talk through the idea of inserting some sort of a subnet group thing in the model to which floating ips (and router external gateways) will associate. It

Re: [openstack-dev] [pbr] [stable] [infra] How to generate .Z version increments on stable/liberty commits

2015-08-03 Thread Jeremy Stanley
On 2015-08-03 16:42:06 + (+), Ian Cordasco wrote: Auto-tagging seems to be the least amount of work. That could be done as a post-commit hook or post-receive (depending on where we implement it) upstream. Well, not as a git hook but we would likely run it as a CI job in zuul's post

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-announce] [release][oslo] tooz release 1.21.0 (liberty)

2015-08-03 Thread Doug Hellmann
Hi, Justin, Perhaps you meant to click through to http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-announce and unsubscribe? Let me know if you need help figuring that interface out. Doug Excerpts from Justin Hammond's message of 2015-08-03 18:00:02 +: FUCK OFF From:

Re: [openstack-dev] [pbr] [stable] [infra] How to generate .Z version increments on stable/liberty commits

2015-08-03 Thread Clark Boylan
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015, at 05:46 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: Hi everyone, A month ago the stable branch team decided to move away from synchronized stable point releases and enable continuous stable branch delivery instead. The end goal is that every commit on a stable branch for a service

Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum][blueprint] magnum-service-list

2015-08-03 Thread Jay Lau
Hi Suro and others, comments on this? Thanks. 2015-07-30 5:40 GMT-04:00 Jay Lau jay.lau@gmail.com: Hi Suro, In my understanding, even other CoE might have service/pod/rc concepts in future, we may still want to distinguish the magnum service-list with magnum coe-service-list.

Re: [openstack-dev] [pbr] [stable] [infra] How to generate .Z version increments on stable/liberty commits

2015-08-03 Thread Ian Cordasco
On 8/3/15, 11:11, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.org wrote: Jeremy Stanley wrote: On 2015-08-03 14:46:51 +0200 (+0200), Thierry Carrez wrote: [...] In order to make this work, it looks like we'd require: * pbr changes so that it supports a mode where every commit on the branch

Re: [openstack-dev] [designate] and [lbaas] - GSLB API and backend support

2015-08-03 Thread Gandhi, Kunal
Hi Graham, Can we have your GSLB pull request merged to the repo https://github.com/gslb/gslb-specs/pull/1/files https://github.com/gslb/gslb-specs/pull/1/files ? I would like to send another pull request based on these changes. Regards Kunal On Jun 30, 2015, at 8:38 AM, Hayes, Graham

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] A possible solution for HA Active-Active

2015-08-03 Thread Gorka Eguileor
On Mon, Aug 03, 2015 at 07:01:45PM +1000, Morgan Fainberg wrote: Lets step back away from tooz. Tooz for the sake of this conversation is as much the same as saying zookeeper or consul or etcd, etc. We should be focused (as both Flavio and Thierry said) on if we need DLM and what it will

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] A possible solution for HA Active-Active

2015-08-03 Thread D'Angelo, Scott
We'll have a chance to discuss DB mutual exclusion at the API nodes at the Cider mid-cyle, which starts tomorrow. The details, issues, and realistic schedule for that will be a key piece to this whole puzzle, since anything else is seen as a temporary solution. -Original Message- From:

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] A possible solution for HA Active-Active

2015-08-03 Thread Fox, Kevin M
For example, to parallel the conversation with databases: We want a database. Well, that means mongodb, postgres, mysql, berkeleydb, etc Oh, well, I need it to be a relational db, Well, that means postgresq, mysql, etc Oh, and I need recursive queries... that excludes even more. We

[openstack-dev] [Infra] Meeting Tuesday August 4th at 19:00 UTC

2015-08-03 Thread Elizabeth K. Joseph
Hi everyone, The OpenStack Infrastructure (Infra) team is having our next weekly meeting on Tuesday August 4th, at 19:00 UTC in #openstack-meeting Meeting agenda available here: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/InfraTeamMeeting (anyone is welcome to to add agenda items) Everyone

Re: [openstack-dev] [Magnum]horizontal scalability

2015-08-03 Thread Adrian Otto
On Aug 2, 2015, at 7:40 PM, 王华 wanghua.hum...@gmail.commailto:wanghua.hum...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, As discussed in the Vancouver Summit, we are going to drop the bay lock implementation. Instead, each conductor will call Heat concurrently and rely on heat for concurrency control.

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] A possible solution for HA Active-Active

2015-08-03 Thread Gorka Eguileor
On Mon, Aug 03, 2015 at 03:42:48PM +, Fox, Kevin M wrote: I'm usually for abstraction layers, but they don't always pay off very well due to catering to the lowest common denominator. Lets clearly define the problem space first. IFF the problem space can be fully implemented using

[openstack-dev] [kolla][announce] Announcing the release of Kolla Liberty-2

2015-08-03 Thread Steven Dake (stdake)
Hi folks, the Kolla community is pleased to announce the release of the Kolla Liberty 2 milestone. This release fixes 77 bugs and implements 18 blueprints! Our community developed the following notable features: * Source building of containers * Ansible Deployment for core services * High

[openstack-dev] [Manila] Midcycle meetup highlights

2015-08-03 Thread Ben Swartzlander
Thanks to all of those who attended the midcycle. We had more than 20 attendees this cycle and excellent participation -- also some new faces! My apologies for the Google Hangouts failure. We ended up switching to Webex for the audio/video conferencing and it scaled significantly better. I

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Common Base class for agents

2015-08-03 Thread Kevin Benton
I would just de-dup anything that is obvious into a common class to inherit from. Don't go through any major re-factorings because that will just take longer to review and will probably need to be reworked anyway when we spend more time on the modular agent stuff later in the cycle. On Mon, Aug

Re: [openstack-dev] [pbr] [stable] [infra] How to generate .Z version increments on stable/liberty commits

2015-08-03 Thread Doug Hellmann
Excerpts from Thierry Carrez's message of 2015-08-03 18:11:53 +0200: Jeremy Stanley wrote: On 2015-08-03 14:46:51 +0200 (+0200), Thierry Carrez wrote: [...] In order to make this work, it looks like we'd require: * pbr changes so that it supports a mode where every commit on the

Re: [openstack-dev] [Keystone][Fernet] HA SQL backend for Fernet keys

2015-08-03 Thread Morgan Fainberg
On Aug 3, 2015, at 21:14, Davanum Srinivas dava...@gmail.com wrote: agree. Native HA solution was already ruled out in several email threads by keystone cores already (if i remember right). This is a devops issue and should be handled as such was the feedback. Correct. This is generally

Re: [openstack-dev] [fuel] [upgrade] Cluster Upgrade - FFE status

2015-08-03 Thread Eugene Bogdanov
Oleg, thanks for the provided information. As discussed verbally, most core reviewers are now busy with fixing critical bugs, so you might get delayed responses. Keeping in mind, let's target Wednesday, Aug 5 as the last deadline. With that said, let's minimize review iterations so core

Re: [openstack-dev] [fuel] [upgrade] Cluster Upgrade - FFE status

2015-08-03 Thread Oleg Gelbukh
Eugene, To increase focus and ensure velocity increase, we decided to descope the following patch from the current release cycle [1]. This willl have minor effect on supported use cases, but will allow us to focus on the required parts [2] [3]. [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/203537/ [2]

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][lbaas] Horizon support for neutron-lbaas v2

2015-08-03 Thread santosh sharma
Hi Vivek, How to get the lbaas v2 UI up with mentioned changelist? Thanks Santosh On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 8:24 AM, Jain, Vivek vivekj...@ebay.com wrote: Initial code for horizon lbaas v2 dashboard submitted: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/206797 Thanks, vivek From: Jain, Vivek

Re: [openstack-dev] [Keystone][Fernet] HA SQL backend for Fernet keys

2015-08-03 Thread Davanum Srinivas
agree. Native HA solution was already ruled out in several email threads by keystone cores already (if i remember right). This is a devops issue and should be handled as such was the feedback. Thanks, -- dims On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 7:03 AM, Sergii Golovatiuk sgolovat...@mirantis.com wrote: Hi,

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][oslo][policy] oslo.policy adoption in Nova.

2015-08-03 Thread Doug Hellmann
Excerpts from Davanum Srinivas (dims)'s message of 2015-08-03 06:46:26 -0400: Doug, All the features needed for Nova to work is present in oslo.policy (i.e. all features from old oslo-incubator copy is present in oslo.policy) Great! I was worried that the copy local to nova had somehow been

Re: [openstack-dev] [Keystone][Fernet] HA SQL backend for Fernet keys

2015-08-03 Thread Adam Heczko
Fine, then this simple bash based solution proposed by Boris [1] LGTM and is not over thinked. Maybe add kind of md5 or sha1 checksum functionality to confirm if keys were rotated correctly and are in sync. [1] http://paste.openstack.org/show/406674/ Regards, Adam On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 2:03

[openstack-dev] [pbr] [stable] [infra] How to generate .Z version increments on stable/liberty commits

2015-08-03 Thread Thierry Carrez
Hi everyone, A month ago the stable branch team decided to move away from synchronized stable point releases and enable continuous stable branch delivery instead. The end goal is that every commit on a stable branch for a service project will get a .Z version increment, and a tag be pushed to

Re: [openstack-dev] [Keystone][Fernet] HA SQL backend for Fernet keys

2015-08-03 Thread David Stanek
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 7:14 AM, Davanum Srinivas dava...@gmail.com wrote: agree. Native HA solution was already ruled out in several email threads by keystone cores already (if i remember right). This is a devops issue and should be handled as such was the feedback. I'm sure you are right.

  1   2   >