[openstack-dev] [Fuel] Changes to the blueprint specification template

2015-08-20 Thread Roman Prykhodchenko
Folks, as you may remember, we were about to merge some changes to the blueprint spec template to make our specifications in Fuel more specific regarding different components and subsystems. That time we decided to move the changes to 8.0, so new specs in 8.0 will have to follow the new

[openstack-dev] [keystone] federation

2015-08-20 Thread Navid Pustchi
Hi I am testing the feasibility of federated token to access another federated resource. For this purpos, I setup three devstack kilo instances as: kilo1 (IdP) - kilo2 (SP / IdP) - kilo3 (SP) 1. get a federated scoped token for a project in kilo2. 2. using this federated token, get

[openstack-dev] [infra] API docs latest-n-greatest

2015-08-20 Thread Anne Gentle
Hi all, A couple of notes for API docs this week. One is, the spec to enable RST builds to developer.openstack.org/api-guide/service merged. The plan is completely documented here: http://specs.openstack.org/openstack/docs-specs/specs/liberty/api-site.html I'm trying to work through the best way

Re: [openstack-dev] [Magnum] Consistent functional test failures

2015-08-20 Thread Steven Dake (stdake)
On 8/13/15, 4:58 PM, Clark Boylan cboy...@sapwetik.org wrote: On Thu, Aug 13, 2015, at 03:13 AM, Tom Cammann wrote: Hi Team, Wanted to let you know why we are having consistent functional test failures in the gate. This is being caused by Nova returning No valid host to heat:

[openstack-dev] [CI] Cannot get compute endpoint when running nodepool.

2015-08-20 Thread Tang Chen
Hi, all, I got following error message while running nodepoold with nodepoold -d $DAEMON_ARGS 2015-08-21 20:18:00,336 ERROR nodepool.NodePool: Exception cleaning up leaked nodes Traceback (most recent call last): File /home/nodepool/nodepool/nodepool.py, line 2399, in

Re: [openstack-dev] [Horizon] Update on Angular Identity work

2015-08-20 Thread Lin Hua Cheng
Hi Thai, From your example, option 1 seems closer to the *current pattern* not option 2. :) Where the user define a list of action separately from the table presentation (HTML template) rather than embedding it in the HTML. And if the user wants to extend it, they just add it to the list of

Re: [openstack-dev] [Magnum] Consistent functional test failures (seems infra not have enough resource)

2015-08-20 Thread Steven Dake (stdake)
On 8/13/15, 6:13 AM, Jeremy Stanley fu...@yuggoth.org wrote: On 2015-08-13 19:38:07 +0800 (+0800), Kai Qiang Wu wrote: I did talked to infra, which I think it is resource issue, But they thought it is nova issue, [...] No, I said the error was being raised by Nova, so was not an error coming

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra] API docs latest-n-greatest

2015-08-20 Thread Alex Xu
在 2015年8月21日,上午9:48,Anne Gentle annegen...@justwriteclick.com 写道: Hi all, A couple of notes for API docs this week. One is, the spec to enable RST builds to developer.openstack.org/api-guide/ http://developer.openstack.org/api-guide/service merged. The plan is completely documented

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] Can`t find Project ID

2015-08-20 Thread Xie, Xianshan
Hi all, This issue has already been resolved. Thanks. Xiexs From: Xie, Xianshan [mailto:xi...@cn.fujitsu.com] Sent: Friday, August 21, 2015 9:51 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: [openstack-dev] [keystone] Can`t find Project ID Hi, all, I got

[openstack-dev] [swift] [swift3] Are there any objections to add scoped tempest job to swift3 pipeline?

2015-08-20 Thread Andrey Pavlov
Hi, In our EC2-API project we use tempest job with regex tempest.thirdparty.boto. And I didn't find any job that runs tempest against cloud with swift3 plugin. I think that this is a good idea to add to swift3 project pipeline tempest job. It will check functionality of swift3 plugin in real

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic] Let's talk about API versions

2015-08-20 Thread Ruby Loo
On 18 August 2015 at 17:13, Ruby Loo rlooya...@gmail.com wrote: On 18 August 2015 at 13:08, Lucas Alvares Gomes lucasago...@gmail.com wrote: HI Hi, I'd like to make sure I understand. Is it the case that ideally, if we could go back in time, we'd like to change the client so it

[openstack-dev] [keystone] Can`t find Project ID

2015-08-20 Thread Xie, Xianshan
Hi, all, I got following error message while running nodepoold: 2015-08-21 20:18:00,336 ERROR nodepool.NodePool: Exception cleaning up leaked nodes Traceback (most recent call last): File /home/nodepool/nodepool/nodepool.py, line 2399, in periodicCleanup

[openstack-dev] [nova] feedback from the ops mid cycle summit

2015-08-20 Thread melanie witt
Hi Everyone, I attended the ops mid cycle summit on Tuesday and Wednesday and here are brief notes on the feedback I heard related to nova. Please feel free to add your comments or correct me if I got anything wrong. Large Deployments Session [1]: - There's a Neutron spec [2] for adding the

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] should we combine a set of minor microversion bump needed fix into one microversoin bump?

2015-08-20 Thread GHANSHYAM MANN
On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 3:33 AM, Matt Riedemann mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote: On 8/19/2015 12:18 PM, Chen CH Ji wrote: In doing [1] [2], some suggestions raised that those kind of change need microversion bump which is fine however, another concern raised on whether we need combine a

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] should we combine a set of minor microversion bump needed fix into one microversoin bump?

2015-08-20 Thread GHANSHYAM MANN
On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 9:40 PM, Alex Xu hejie...@intel.com wrote: Let me wrote down what I’m analyse about this(I’m not good at this…and this spend another hour for me...): When OverQuota isn’t catched by API layer, we will get response as below: {computeFault: {message: Unexpected API

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] should we combine a set of minor microversion bump needed fix into one microversoin bump?

2015-08-20 Thread Alex Xu
在 2015年8月21日,上午3:09,Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com 写道: On 08/20/2015 02:08 PM, melanie witt wrote: On Aug 20, 2015, at 5:40, Alex Xu hejie...@intel.com wrote: So user may wrote client like this: if response.status == 500 and ‘OverQuota’ in response.message: ….. I thought we're

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] should we combine a set of minor microversion bump needed fix into one microversoin bump?

2015-08-20 Thread Alex Xu
在 2015年8月21日,上午10:14,Alex Xu hejie...@intel.com 写道: 在 2015年8月21日,上午3:09,Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com mailto:jaypi...@gmail.com 写道: On 08/20/2015 02:08 PM, melanie witt wrote: On Aug 20, 2015, at 5:40, Alex Xu hejie...@intel.com mailto:hejie...@intel.com wrote: So user may wrote

[openstack-dev] [infra][third-party] Some unknown updates broke nodepool connection to provider. Read for solution.

2015-08-20 Thread Asselin, Ramy
All, Recently, some external dependency broke nodepool's ability to launch VMs on an openstack provider. If you haven't run into this yet, it's probably because you haven't restarted nodepool. When you do, you might get an error similar to [1] I couldn't find the issue, but regardless, there's

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-docs] [docs][api] pecan-swagger generated api

2015-08-20 Thread Anne Gentle
On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 7:58 PM, Melnik, Aleksandr S aleksandr.s.mel...@hp.com wrote: I work on the Cue project at HP and I’m working on auto-generating our API documentation. I’m also keeping up with the changes and ongoing migrations at openstack docs. The new RST work documentation looks

Re: [openstack-dev] [Magnum] Consistent functional test failures

2015-08-20 Thread Steven Dake (stdake)
Kai, This sounds like a good solution. The actual VM doesn’t need to be super large given our present tests. Regards -steve From: Kai Qiang Wu wk...@cn.ibm.commailto:wk...@cn.ibm.com Reply-To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Kuryr - virtual sprint

2015-08-20 Thread Antoni Segura Puimedon
On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 11:50 PM, Salvatore Orlando salv.orla...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Gal, even if I've been a lurker so far, I'm interested in attending for learning and contributing to it with my massive bug-injecting skills! You said virtual sprint and somewhere in september - I think

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] [nova] Image Prefetching – Precaching

2015-08-20 Thread John Garbutt
On 19 August 2015 at 19:30, Alberto Geniola albertogeni...@gmail.com wrote: Hi everyone, This is my first email to the OS developer forum, so forgive me if I misplaced the subject tags J. Welcome! For future posts, I hope this helps make it easier:

[openstack-dev] [Neutron] Targeting Logging API for SG and FW rules feature to L-3 milestone

2015-08-20 Thread hoan...@vn.fujitsu.com
Hi Kye Mestery [PTL], CC: Sean M. Collins [FWaaS chair], CC: All, According to the last FWaaS IRC weekly meeting, the Logging API for SG and FW rules feature will be reviewed and handled by FWaaS core team. #link

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Targeting Logging API for SG and FW rules feature to L-3 milestone

2015-08-20 Thread Gal Sagie
I think that before this can be applied to SG rules which are on the VM ports, there needs to be another spec in FWaaS which enable defining rules on VM ports, i am not sure something like that currently exists. (event that there are many use cases for such ability) Gal. On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Great updates to tests and CI jobs

2015-08-20 Thread Roman Prykhodchenko
I think, that if there are 4-5 patches that pass python jobs w/o any problems, we can switch the jobs to voting. They are really simple with a very little room for a failure so should we wait longer? 19 серп. 2015 о 19:50 Sebastian Kalinowski skalinow...@mirantis.com написав(ла): Indeed,

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Great updates to tests and CI jobs

2015-08-20 Thread Roman Prykhodchenko
Mike, there were indeed several issues with the new Jenkins script. It seems we fixed them. - Roman 20 серп. 2015 о 02:00 Mike Scherbakov mscherba...@mirantis.com написав(ла): Sounds great. Thank you Roman! I've heard complains about tests not passing for [1]. Now it's passed, so I hope

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Great updates to tests and CI jobs

2015-08-20 Thread Sebastian Kalinowski
If there will be 4-5 patches, then I do not have anything against it. I'm just skeptic that we will have so many ;) 2015-08-20 14:05 GMT+02:00 Roman Prykhodchenko m...@romcheg.me: I think, that if there are 4-5 patches that pass python jobs w/o any problems, we can switch the jobs to voting.

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] binding information for networks

2015-08-20 Thread Antoni Segura Puimedon
On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 10:24 PM, Assaf Muller amul...@redhat.com wrote: On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 2:34 PM, Gal Sagie gal.sa...@gmail.com wrote: Hello all, Recently i have came across two use cases that having binding information, or metadata for networks can be useful. (similar to the

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder][ThirdPartyCI]CloudFounders OpenvStorage CI - request to re-add the cinder driver

2015-08-20 Thread Eduard Matei
Hi, Trying to get more attention to this ... Also, The CI will (starting next week) be commenting using the name Open vStorage CI instead of CloudFounders OpenvStorage CI. Thanks, Eduard On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 5:44 PM, Eduard Matei eduard.ma...@cloudfounders.com wrote: Hi, We had our

[openstack-dev] [murano] [dashboard] public package visibility in Package Definitions UX concern

2015-08-20 Thread Kirill Zaitsev
On our latest irc meeting I raised a concern about public package visibility. Here’s the commit that caused my concerns https://review.openstack.org/#/c/213682/ We currently have «catalog» and «package definitions» pages in our dashboard. The former contains packages that the user can add in

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] contextlib.nested and Python3 failing

2015-08-20 Thread John Garbutt
On 20 August 2015 at 01:42, melanie witt melwi...@gmail.com wrote: On Aug 19, 2015, at 16:51, Sylvain Bauza sba...@redhat.com wrote: Ideas appreciated. Instead of using the nested context managers, a way I like is to decorate a nested function in the test and call it, for example: def

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] should we combine a set of minor microversion bump needed fix into one microversoin bump?

2015-08-20 Thread John Garbutt
On 19 August 2015 at 20:37, Matt Riedemann mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote: On 8/19/2015 2:16 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: On 8/19/2015 1:33 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: On 8/19/2015 12:18 PM, Chen CH Ji wrote: In doing [1] [2], some suggestions raised that those kind of change need microversion

Re: [openstack-dev] [third-party-ci]Tests randomly failing because of lvm

2015-08-20 Thread Eduard Matei
Hi, In case someone is still interested, 32768 is the fix. The number of PEs must be multiple of 1024 (not sure why). Eduard __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe:

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][qa] libvirt + LXC CI - where's the beef?

2015-08-20 Thread John Garbutt
On 20 August 2015 at 03:08, Matt Riedemann mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote: After spending a few hours on https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1370590 I'm annoyed by the fact we don't yet have a CI system for testing libvirt + LXC. Bit thank you for raising this one. At the Juno midcycle in

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-deb] Devstack stable/juno fails to install

2015-08-20 Thread Eduard Matei
Hi, ATM our workaround is to manually pip install futures==2.2.0 before running stack.sh Any idea when an official fix will be available? Thanks, Eduard __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] VPNaaS and DVR compatibility

2015-08-20 Thread Sergey Kolekonov
Thanks for the link, Sean. No, it doesn't seem to resolve the issue with FWaaS. BTW, I have the following cluster: - OpenStack Kilo (including *aaS) from the latest stable/kilo branches - 2 networks nodes - 1 compute node Ubuntu 14.04, ML2+OVS, vxlan segmentation. All nodes are KVM VMs. So with

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][keystone] oslo_config and wsgi middlewares

2015-08-20 Thread Mehdi Abaakouk
It looks like the additional features added, in particular the 'oslo_config_project' property, needs to be documented. I have added some documentation into the keystonemiddleware too: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/208965/ --- Mehdi Abaakouk mail: sil...@sileht.net irc: sileht

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][keystone] oslo_config and wsgi middlewares

2015-08-20 Thread Mehdi Abaakouk
Hi, Also to support some of the newer services that don't use paste i think we should absolutely make it so that the CONF object is passed to middleware rather than sourced globally. I think gnochhi and zaqar both fit into this case. For example, Gnocchi doesn't use paste, deployer adds

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-deb] Devstack stable/juno fails to install

2015-08-20 Thread Tony Breeds
On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 02:12:44PM +0300, Eduard Matei wrote: Hi, ATM our workaround is to manually pip install futures==2.2.0 before running stack.sh Yeah that's what I did. You can also add that command to tools/fixup.sh Any idea when an official fix will be available? We're workign

Re: [openstack-dev] [Horizon] Update on Angular Identity work

2015-08-20 Thread Doug Fish
It appears to me that option 1 would be better prepared to be extensible ... That is if a plugin needed to add an action or a column, we could make that happen with pattern 1 (possibly after adding in a service) I'm not sure how plugins ever add these things with pattern 2. On Aug 20, 2015,

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Moving instack upstream

2015-08-20 Thread Derek Higgins
Sorry for the delay in following up on this but I've been on my hols The instack ci jobs should now work, it appears to be getting hit by a LOT of network glitches in particular downloading from the centos infrastructure but I think to avoid more delay we should merge the things and work on

[openstack-dev] [app-catalog] App Catalog IRC meeting minutes - 8/20/2015

2015-08-20 Thread Christopher Aedo
We had a quick meeting today and covered the excellent progress Kevin Fox is making on a Horizon plugin for the App Catalog, as well as a brief update on whether the codebase for ask.o.o would be worth considering as a backend for the catalog. As always, please join us on IRC

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] Re: New API for node create, specifying initial provision state

2015-08-20 Thread Jim Rollenhagen
On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 09:48:29AM +0100, Lucas Alvares Gomes wrote: Hi, After thinking about this some more, I'm not actually going to address Rob's points above. What I want to do is go back and discuss... what do people think about having an API that allows the initial provision state

Re: [openstack-dev] [Horizon] Update on Angular Identity work

2015-08-20 Thread Thai Q Tran
Hi Lin,Let me draw on some examples to help clarify what I mean.Option 1:table.controller.jsctrl.headers = { gettext('column 1'), gettext('column 2')};ctrl.noItemMessage = gettext('You no longer have any items in your table. You either lack the sufficient priveledges or your

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] should we combine a set of minor microversion bump needed fix into one microversoin bump?

2015-08-20 Thread melanie witt
On Aug 20, 2015, at 5:40, Alex Xu hejie...@intel.com wrote: So user may wrote client like this: if response.status == 500 and ‘OverQuota’ in response.message: ….. I thought we're not supporting that type of case. My understanding is that we should never be returning 500 and if we are,

[openstack-dev] [congress][requirements] Requirements proposal job fails

2015-08-20 Thread Andreas Jaeger
The requirements proposal job fails syncing to congress with this error: 'PuLP' is not in global-requirements.txt congress team, please resolve this. Options include getting this into global-requirements or removing it from your project. Details:

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] Re: New API for node create, specifying initial provision state

2015-08-20 Thread Robert Collins
On 21 Aug 2015 6:45 am, Jim Rollenhagen +1, there are tons of dragons here. Now that we're to the point where our state machine is well-defined with a single entrypoint, I think I'm clearly confused. When was 1.6 deleted? Rob

[openstack-dev] [Manila] Contract of ShareDriver.deny_access

2015-08-20 Thread Bjorn Schuberg
Hello everyone, this is my first thread on this mailing list, and I would like to take the opportunity to say that it was great to see you all at the midcycle, even if remote. Now, to my question; I've been looking into an issue that arise when deleting access to a share, and then momentarily

[openstack-dev] [Keystone][Glance] keystonemiddleware multiple keystone endpoints

2015-08-20 Thread Hans Feldt
How do you configure/use keystonemiddleware for a specific identity endpoint among several? In an OPNFV multi region prototype I have keystone endpoints per region. I would like keystonemiddleware (in context of glance-api) to use the local keystone for performing user token validation.

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Kuryr - virtual sprint

2015-08-20 Thread Irena Berezovsky
Second or last week of September work for me On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 3:22 PM, Antoni Segura Puimedon toni+openstac...@midokura.com wrote: On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 11:50 PM, Salvatore Orlando salv.orla...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Gal, even if I've been a lurker so far, I'm interested in

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] should we combine a set of minor microversion bump needed fix into one microversoin bump?

2015-08-20 Thread Alex Xu
Let me wrote down what I’m analyse about this(I’m not good at this…and this spend another hour for me...): When OverQuota isn’t catched by API layer, we will get response as below: {computeFault: {message: Unexpected API Error. Please report this at http://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][qa] libvirt + LXC CI - where's the beef?

2015-08-20 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 8/20/2015 5:33 AM, John Garbutt wrote: On 20 August 2015 at 03:08, Matt Riedemann mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote: After spending a few hours on https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1370590 I'm annoyed by the fact we don't yet have a CI system for testing libvirt + LXC. Bit thank you

[openstack-dev] [cinder] EMC VNX Blueprints Exceptions

2015-08-20 Thread Mike Perez
On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 8:27 PM, yang, xing xing.y...@emc.com wrote: Hi Mike, I’m wondering if you can consider approving the following blueprints. They were submitted late:(. These are good to be used as reference implementations for the new features, so I think it is good to have them.

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] EMC VNX Blueprints Exceptions

2015-08-20 Thread yang, xing
Hi Mike, No problem. Thanks, Xing On Aug 21, 2015, at 1:37 AM, Mike Perez thin...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 8:27 PM, yang, xing xing.y...@emc.com wrote: Hi Mike, I’m wondering if you can consider approving the following blueprints. They were submitted late:(. These

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] Can`t find Project ID

2015-08-20 Thread Steve Martinelli
For the rest of the mailing list, how was it resolved? :) Thanks, Steve Martinelli OpenStack Keystone Core From: Xie, Xianshan xi...@cn.fujitsu.com To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Date: 2015/08/21 01:43 AM

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] Re: New API for node create, specifying initial provision state

2015-08-20 Thread Lucas Alvares Gomes
Hi On 21 Aug 2015 6:45 am, Jim Rollenhagen +1, there are tons of dragons here. Now that we're to the point where our state machine is well-defined with a single entrypoint, I think I'm clearly confused. When was 1.6 deleted? It wasn't and won't be AFAICT. But I think Jim is talking about

Re: [openstack-dev] [congress][requirements] Requirements proposal job fails

2015-08-20 Thread Robert Collins
It was just removed from global requirements, because it was not used. That's clearly wrong. So let's refer that and add it back. On 21 Aug 2015 6:27 am, Andreas Jaeger a...@suse.com wrote: The requirements proposal job fails syncing to congress with this error: 'PuLP' is not in

Re: [openstack-dev] [congress][requirements] Requirements proposal job fails

2015-08-20 Thread Andreas Jaeger
On 08/20/2015 09:32 PM, Robert Collins wrote: It was just removed from global requirements, because it was not used. That's clearly wrong. So let's refer that and add it back. Ah, that explains it, let's revert the change: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/215306/ Thanks, Andreas -- Andreas

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] should we combine a set of minor microversion bump needed fix into one microversoin bump?

2015-08-20 Thread Jay Pipes
On 08/20/2015 02:08 PM, melanie witt wrote: On Aug 20, 2015, at 5:40, Alex Xu hejie...@intel.com wrote: So user may wrote client like this: if response.status == 500 and ‘OverQuota’ in response.message: ….. I thought we're not supporting that type of case. My understanding is that we

Re: [openstack-dev] [sahara] Proposing Ethan Gafford for the core reviewer team

2015-08-20 Thread Sergey Lukjanov
As there no objections, I'm glad to congratulate us with a new core review team member ;) Ethan, congratulations! On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 10:48 AM, Flavio Percoco fla...@redhat.com wrote: On 16/08/15 19:51 +, Telles Nobrega wrote: For what is worth I got that it was just a joke.

Re: [openstack-dev] [congress][requirements] Requirements proposal job fails

2015-08-20 Thread Tim Hinrichs
Thanks for sorting that out. +1ed the change. Tim On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 12:53 PM Andreas Jaeger a...@suse.com wrote: On 08/20/2015 09:32 PM, Robert Collins wrote: It was just removed from global requirements, because it was not used. That's clearly wrong. So let's refer that and add it

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][cinder] Extending attached disks

2015-08-20 Thread Mike Perez
On 19:53 Aug 19, John Griffith wrote: On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 7:48 PM, taylor.ber...@solnet.co.nz wrote: Hi everyone, Apologises for the duplicate send, looks like my mail client doesn't create very clean HTML messages. Here is the message in plain-text. I'll make sure to send to the

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][cinder] Extending attached disks

2015-08-20 Thread Taylor . Bertie
Excellent, Good to see this is being discussed on the Cinder side. I'll keep looking and hopefully we hear back from Nova either in this thread or by other means if they're prepared to go ahead with this. Regards, Taylor Bertie Enterprise Support Infrastructure Engineer Mobile +64 27 952

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] Re: New API for node create, specifying initial provision state

2015-08-20 Thread Jim Rollenhagen
On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 09:57:14PM +0100, Lucas Alvares Gomes wrote: Hi On 21 Aug 2015 6:45 am, Jim Rollenhagen +1, there are tons of dragons here. Now that we're to the point where our state machine is well-defined with a single entrypoint, I think I'm clearly confused. When was

Re: [openstack-dev] [packaging] asks from the ops meetup

2015-08-20 Thread Matthew Thode
On 08/20/2015 09:22 AM, Ian Cordasco wrote: On 8/19/15, 19:31, Matthew Thode prometheanf...@gentoo.org wrote: On 08/19/2015 07:22 PM, Ian Cordasco wrote: Questions in-line, but I'd appreciate a better summary On 8/19/15, 17:50, Matthew Thode prometheanf...@gentoo.org wrote: I'll start

Re: [openstack-dev] [congress][requirements] Requirements proposal job fails

2015-08-20 Thread Robert Collins
I think it would be nice if someone were to cook up a patch to the functional tests (integration.sh) to make sure that we are still able to sync to that project without errors. -Rob On 21 August 2015 at 08:01, Tim Hinrichs t...@styra.com wrote: Thanks for sorting that out. +1ed the change.

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Targeting Logging API for SG and FW rules feature to L-3 milestone

2015-08-20 Thread Sean M. Collins
On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 06:55:12AM EDT, hoan...@vn.fujitsu.com wrote: Hi Kye Mestery [PTL], CC: Sean M. Collins [FWaaS chair], CC: All, According to the last FWaaS IRC weekly meeting, the Logging API for SG and FW rules feature will be reviewed and handled by FWaaS core team. #link