Re: [openstack-dev] Scheduler hints, API and Objects

2015-09-04 Thread Ken'ichi Ohmichi
2015-09-04 12:14 GMT+09:00 Ken'ichi Ohmichi : > Hi Andrew, > > Sorry for this late response, I missed it. > > 2015-06-25 23:22 GMT+09:00 Andrew Laski : >> I have been growing concerned recently with some attempts to formalize >> scheduler hints, both with

[openstack-dev] [all] Mitaka Design Summit - Proposed slot allocation

2015-09-04 Thread Thierry Carrez
Hi PTLs, Here is the proposed slot allocation for every "big tent" project team at the Mitaka Design Summit in Tokyo. This is based on the requests the liberty PTLs have made, space availability and project activity & collaboration needs. We have a lot less space (and time slots) in Tokyo

Re: [openstack-dev] Scheduler hints, API and Objects

2015-09-04 Thread Ken'ichi Ohmichi
Hi Alex, Thanks for your comment. IMO, this idea is different from the extension we will remove. That is modularity for the maintenance burden. By this idea, we can put the corresponding schema in each filter. 2015年9月4日(金) 19:04 Alex Xu : > 2015-09-04 11:14 GMT+08:00 Ken'ichi

Re: [openstack-dev] [murano] [dashboard] Remove the owner filter from "Package Definitions" page

2015-09-04 Thread Ekaterina Chernova
Agreed. Currently, pagination is broken on "Package definitions" page now, so removing that filter will fix it back. Also, 'Other' tab looks unhelpful, admin should indicate to witch tenant this package belongs to. This improvement will be added later. Regards, Kate. On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 1:06

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Mitaka Design Summit - Proposed slot allocation

2015-09-04 Thread Steven Hardy
On Fri, Sep 04, 2015 at 12:14:06PM +0200, Thierry Carrez wrote: > > We'll start working on laying out those sessions over the available > rooms and time slots. If you have constraints (I already know > searchlight wants to avoid conflicts with Horizon, Kolla with Magnum, > Manila with Cinder,

Re: [openstack-dev] [murano] [dashboard] Remove the owner filter from "Package Definitions" page

2015-09-04 Thread Alexander Tivelkov
​+1 on this. Filtering by ownership makes sense only on Catalog view (i.e. on the page of usable apps) ​but not on the admin-like console like the list of package definitions. -- Regards, Alexander Tivelkov On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 12:36 PM, Dmitro Dovbii wrote: > Hi

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-announce] [release][nova] python-novaclient release 2.28.0 (liberty)

2015-09-04 Thread Sean Dague
On 09/02/2015 05:48 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: > > > On 9/2/2015 3:40 PM, Jeremy Stanley wrote: >> On 2015-09-02 10:55:56 -0400 (-0400), d...@doughellmann.com wrote: >>> We are thrilled to announce the release of: >>> >>> python-novaclient 2.27.0: Client library for OpenStack Compute API >> [...]

Re: [openstack-dev] Scheduler hints, API and Objects

2015-09-04 Thread Alex Xu
2015-09-04 11:14 GMT+08:00 Ken'ichi Ohmichi : > Hi Andrew, > > Sorry for this late response, I missed it. > > 2015-06-25 23:22 GMT+09:00 Andrew Laski : > > I have been growing concerned recently with some attempts to formalize > > scheduler hints, both

Re: [openstack-dev] [sahara] FFE request for heat wait condition support

2015-09-04 Thread Vitaly Gridnev
+1 for FFE, because of 1. Low risk of issues, fully covered with current scenario tests; 2. Implementation already on review On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 12:54 PM, Sergey Reshetnyak wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to request FFE for wait condition support for Heat engine.

Re: [openstack-dev] FFE Request for completion of data driven assignment testing in Keystone

2015-09-04 Thread Henry Nash
Great, thanks. Henry > On 4 Sep 2015, at 09:17, Thierry Carrez wrote: > > Morgan Fainberg wrote: >> >>>I would like to request an FFE for the remaining two patches that >>>are already in review >>>(https://review.openstack.org/#/c/153897/ and >>>

[openstack-dev] [murano] [dashboard] Remove the owner filter from "Package Definitions" page

2015-09-04 Thread Dmitro Dovbii
Hi folks! I want suggest you to delete owner filter (3 tabs) from Package Definition page. Previously this filter was available for all users and we agreed that it is useless. Now it is available only for admin but I think this fact still doesn't improve the UX. Moreover, this filter prevents the

[openstack-dev] [sahara] FFE request for heat wait condition support

2015-09-04 Thread Sergey Reshetnyak
Hi, I would like to request FFE for wait condition support for Heat engine. Wait condition reports signal about booting instance. Blueprint: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/sahara/+spec/sahara-heat-wait-conditions Spec:

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-announce] [release][nova] python-novaclient release 2.28.0 (liberty)

2015-09-04 Thread Sean Dague
On 09/04/2015 07:15 AM, Sean Dague wrote: > On 09/02/2015 05:48 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: >> >> >> On 9/2/2015 3:40 PM, Jeremy Stanley wrote: >>> On 2015-09-02 10:55:56 -0400 (-0400), d...@doughellmann.com wrote: We are thrilled to announce the release of: python-novaclient 2.27.0:

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Mitaka Design Summit - Proposed slot allocation

2015-09-04 Thread Flavio Percoco
On 04/09/15 12:14 +0200, Thierry Carrez wrote: Hi PTLs, Here is the proposed slot allocation for every "big tent" project team at the Mitaka Design Summit in Tokyo. This is based on the requests the liberty PTLs have made, space availability and project activity & collaboration needs. We have

Re: [openstack-dev] [sahara] Request for Feature Freeze Exception

2015-09-04 Thread Sergey Reshetnyak
+1 from me. Thanks, Sergey R. 2015-09-03 23:27 GMT+03:00 Ethan Gafford : > Agreed. We've talked about this for a while, and it's very low risk. > > Thanks, > Ethan > > - Original Message - > From: "michael mccune" > To:

Re: [openstack-dev] Scheduler hints, API and Objects

2015-09-04 Thread Sylvain Bauza
Le 04/09/2015 12:18, Ken'ichi Ohmichi a écrit : Hi Alex, Thanks for your comment. IMO, this idea is different from the extension we will remove. That is modularity for the maintenance burden. By this idea, we can put the corresponding schema in each filter. While I think it could be a

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Mitaka Design Summit - Proposed slot allocation

2015-09-04 Thread Dmitry Tantsur
On 09/04/2015 12:14 PM, Thierry Carrez wrote: Hi PTLs, Here is the proposed slot allocation for every "big tent" project team at the Mitaka Design Summit in Tokyo. This is based on the requests the liberty PTLs have made, space availability and project activity & collaboration needs. We have a

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Mitaka Design Summit - Proposed slot allocation

2015-09-04 Thread Nikhil Komawar
No dedicated time slot for cross-project sessions this time around? On 9/4/15 6:14 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: > Hi PTLs, > > Here is the proposed slot allocation for every "big tent" project team > at the Mitaka Design Summit in Tokyo. This is based on the requests the > liberty PTLs have made,

Re: [openstack-dev] Scheduler hints, API and Objects

2015-09-04 Thread Andrew Laski
On 09/04/15 at 06:54pm, Ken'ichi Ohmichi wrote: 2015-09-04 12:14 GMT+09:00 Ken'ichi Ohmichi : Hi Andrew, Sorry for this late response, I missed it. 2015-06-25 23:22 GMT+09:00 Andrew Laski : I have been growing concerned recently with some attempts to

Re: [openstack-dev] Scheduler hints, API and Objects

2015-09-04 Thread Sylvain Bauza
Le 04/09/2015 14:57, Nikola Đipanov a écrit : On 06/25/2015 04:50 PM, Monty Taylor wrote: On 06/25/2015 10:22 AM, Andrew Laski wrote: I have been growing concerned recently with some attempts to formalize scheduler hints, both with API validation and Nova objects defining them, and want to

Re: [openstack-dev] Scheduler hints, API and Objects

2015-09-04 Thread Andrew Laski
On 09/04/15 at 01:57pm, Nikola Đipanov wrote: On 06/25/2015 04:50 PM, Monty Taylor wrote: On 06/25/2015 10:22 AM, Andrew Laski wrote: I have been growing concerned recently with some attempts to formalize scheduler hints, both with API validation and Nova objects defining them, and want to air

[openstack-dev] [Openstack] [Horizon] [Sahara] FFE request for Sahara unified job interface map UI

2015-09-04 Thread Ethan Gafford
Hello all, I request a FFE for the change at: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/209683/ This change enables a significant improvement to UX in Sahara's elastic data processing flow which is already in the server and client layers of Sahara. Because it specifically aims at improving ease of use

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Mitaka Design Summit - Proposed slot allocation

2015-09-04 Thread gord chung
On 04/09/2015 6:14 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: Hi PTLs, Here is the proposed slot allocation for every "big tent" project team at the Mitaka Design Summit in Tokyo. This is based on the requests the liberty PTLs have made, space availability and project activity & collaboration needs. We have

Re: [openstack-dev] [puppet] hosting developer documentation on http://docs.openstack.org/developer/

2015-09-04 Thread Emilien Macchi
On 09/03/2015 03:00 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote: > > > On 09/02/2015 02:56 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote: >> >> >> On 09/02/2015 02:48 PM, Anita Kuno wrote: >>> On 09/02/2015 02:09 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote: TL;DR, I propose to move our developer documentation from wiki to something like

Re: [openstack-dev] Scheduler hints, API and Objects

2015-09-04 Thread Nikola Đipanov
On 09/04/2015 02:31 PM, Sylvain Bauza wrote: > > > Le 04/09/2015 14:57, Nikola Đipanov a écrit : >> On 06/25/2015 04:50 PM, Monty Taylor wrote: >>> On 06/25/2015 10:22 AM, Andrew Laski wrote: I have been growing concerned recently with some attempts to formalize scheduler hints, both

[openstack-dev] This is what disabled-by-policy should look like to the user

2015-09-04 Thread Monty Taylor
mordred@camelot:~$ neutron net-create test-net-mt Policy doesn't allow create_network to be performed. Thank you neutron. Excellent job. Here's what that looks like at the REST layer: DEBUG: keystoneclient.session RESP: [403] date: Fri, 04 Sep 2015 13:55:47 GMT connection: close content-type:

Re: [openstack-dev] Scheduler hints, API and Objects

2015-09-04 Thread Nikola Đipanov
On 06/25/2015 04:50 PM, Monty Taylor wrote: > On 06/25/2015 10:22 AM, Andrew Laski wrote: >> I have been growing concerned recently with some attempts to formalize >> scheduler hints, both with API validation and Nova objects defining >> them, and want to air those concerns and see if others agree

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack] [Horizon] [Sahara] FFE request for Sahara unified job interface map UI

2015-09-04 Thread michael mccune
On 09/04/2015 10:40 AM, Ethan Gafford wrote: Hello all, I request a FFE for the change at: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/209683/ This change enables a significant improvement to UX in Sahara's elastic data processing flow which is already in the server and client layers of Sahara. Because

[openstack-dev] [Manila] Gate breakage and technical FFEs

2015-09-04 Thread Ben Swartzlander
The Manila gate is finally unblocked, thanks to the efforts of Valeriy! I see patches going in now so all of the features which were granted technical FFEs should start merging IMMEDIATELY. By my calculations, we lost approximately 30 hours of time to merge stuff before the scheduled feature

[openstack-dev] [ptl][release] flushing unreleased client library changes

2015-09-04 Thread Doug Hellmann
PTLs, We have quite a few unreleased client changes pending, and it would be good to go ahead and publish them so they can be tested as part of the release candidate process. I have the full list of changes for each project below, so please find yours and review them and then propose a release

Re: [openstack-dev] This is what disabled-by-policy should look like to the user

2015-09-04 Thread Monty Taylor
On 09/04/2015 10:55 AM, Morgan Fainberg wrote: On Sep 4, 2015, at 07:04, Monty Taylor wrote: mordred@camelot:~$ neutron net-create test-net-mt Policy doesn't allow create_network to be performed. Thank you neutron. Excellent job. Here's what that looks like at the

[openstack-dev] [DevStack][Keystone][Ironic][Swit] FYI: Defaulting to Keystone v3 API

2015-09-04 Thread Lucas Alvares Gomes
Hi, This is email is just a FYI: Recently the patch [1] got merged in DevStack and broke the Ironic gate [2], I haven't had time to dig into the problem yet so I reverted the patch [3] to unblock our gate. The work to convert to v3 seems to be close enough but not yet there so I just want to

[openstack-dev] [Congress] bugs for liberty release

2015-09-04 Thread Tim Hinrichs
Hi all, I've found a few bugs that we could/should fix by the liberty release. I tagged them with "liberty-rc". If we could all pitch in, that'd be great. Let me know which ones you'd like to work on so I can assign them to you in launchpad.

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] Feature Freeze Exception proposal

2015-09-04 Thread Nikhil Komawar
Hi Malini et.al., We had a sync up earlier today on this topic and a few items were discussed including new comments on the spec and existing code proposal. You can find the logs of the conversation here [1]. There are 3 main outcomes of the discussion: 1. We hope to get a commitment on the

Re: [openstack-dev] [DevStack][Keystone][Ironic][Swit][Barbican] FYI: Defaulting to Keystone v3 API

2015-09-04 Thread Steve Martinelli
This change also affected Barbican too, but they quickly tossed up a patch to resolve the gate failures [1]. As much as I would like DevStack and OpenStackClient to default to Keystone's v3 API, we should - considering how close we are in the schedule, revert the initial patch (which I see sdague

Re: [openstack-dev] This is what disabled-by-policy should look like to the user

2015-09-04 Thread Morgan Fainberg
> On Sep 4, 2015, at 07:04, Monty Taylor wrote: > > mordred@camelot:~$ neutron net-create test-net-mt > Policy doesn't allow create_network to be performed. > > Thank you neutron. Excellent job. > > Here's what that looks like at the REST layer: > > DEBUG:

Re: [openstack-dev] [sahara] FFE request for heat wait condition support

2015-09-04 Thread michael mccune
makes sense to me, +1 mike On 09/04/2015 06:37 AM, Vitaly Gridnev wrote: +1 for FFE, because of 1. Low risk of issues, fully covered with current scenario tests; 2. Implementation already on review On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 12:54 PM, Sergey Reshetnyak

Re: [openstack-dev] FFE Request for completion of data driven assignment testing in Keystone

2015-09-04 Thread Morgan Fainberg
Henry, I've applied the -2 (for Feature Freeze) to a bunch of patchsets, I think I excluded your testing ones, but if the testing ones got -2'd please let me know so I can remove the -2. --Morgan On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 2:07 AM, Henry Nash wrote: > Great, thanks. > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [ptl][release] flushing unreleased client library changes

2015-09-04 Thread Ben Swartzlander
On 09/04/2015 12:39 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: PTLs, We have quite a few unreleased client changes pending, and it would be good to go ahead and publish them so they can be tested as part of the release candidate process. I have the full list of changes for each project below, so please find

Re: [openstack-dev] This is what disabled-by-policy should look like to the user

2015-09-04 Thread Mathieu Gagné
On 2015-09-04 12:50 PM, Monty Taylor wrote: > On 09/04/2015 10:55 AM, Morgan Fainberg wrote: >> >> Obviously the translation of errors >> would be more difficult if the enforcer is generating messages. > > The type: "PolicyNotAuthorized" is a good general key. Also - even > though the command I

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] cloud-init IPv6 support

2015-09-04 Thread Henry Gessau
Some thought has been given to this. See https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1460177 I like the third option, a well-known name using DNS. On Thu, Sep 03, 2015, Kevin Benton wrote: > I think that's different than what is being asked here. That patch appears to > just add

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Mitaka Design Summit - Proposed slot allocation

2015-09-04 Thread Jim Rollenhagen
On Fri, Sep 04, 2015 at 01:52:41PM +0200, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: > On 09/04/2015 12:14 PM, Thierry Carrez wrote: > >Hi PTLs, > > > >Here is the proposed slot allocation for every "big tent" project team > >at the Mitaka Design Summit in Tokyo. This is based on the requests the > >liberty PTLs have

Re: [openstack-dev] custom lbaas driver

2015-09-04 Thread Srikumar Chari
Hello, I am trying to write an custom lbaas v2.0 driver. Was wondering if there's a document on how to go about that. I see a number of implementations as part of the source code but they all seem to be different. For instance HAProxy is completely different when compared to the other vendors. I

Re: [openstack-dev] [ptl][release] flushing unreleased client library changes

2015-09-04 Thread Doug Hellmann
Excerpts from Ben Swartzlander's message of 2015-09-04 14:51:10 -0400: > On 09/04/2015 12:39 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: > > PTLs, > > > > We have quite a few unreleased client changes pending, and it would > > be good to go ahead and publish them so they can be tested as part > > of the release

Re: [openstack-dev] [ptl][release] flushing unreleased client library changes

2015-09-04 Thread Doug Hellmann
Excerpts from Ihar Hrachyshka's message of 2015-09-04 21:07:47 +0200: > > On 04 Sep 2015, at 18:39, Doug Hellmann wrote: > > > > > > PTLs, > > > > We have quite a few unreleased client changes pending, and it would > > be good to go ahead and publish them so they can be

Re: [openstack-dev] [Manila] Gate breakage and technical FFEs

2015-09-04 Thread Ben Swartzlander
On 09/04/2015 12:36 PM, Ben Swartzlander wrote: The Manila gate is finally unblocked, thanks to the efforts of Valeriy! I see patches going in now so all of the features which were granted technical FFEs should start merging IMMEDIATELY. By my calculations, we lost approximately 30 hours of

[openstack-dev] [nova][i18n] Is there any point in using _() in python-novaclient?

2015-09-04 Thread Matt Riedemann
I noticed this today: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/219768/ And it got me thinking about something I've wondered before - why do we even use _() in python-novaclient? It doesn't have any .po files for babel message translation, it has no babel config, there is nothing in setup.cfg about

[openstack-dev] [app-catalog] App Catalog IRC meeting minutes - 9/3/2015

2015-09-04 Thread Christopher Aedo
We had a good meeting yesterday which included a little cheer for the Community App Catalog project being accepted into the big tent (thanks to everyone who has been supporting our efforts all along!) The bulk of the meeting was then devoted to discussing our plans for the next generation of the

[openstack-dev] [Glance] Liberty RC reviews

2015-09-04 Thread Nikhil Komawar
Hi all, Please take some time to go through the etherpad I've created to prioritize reviews needed for Liberty RC period. These reviews have been categorized to help pick your favorite but all of them are important. As we have a decent amount of time to identify bugs and fix them, reviewing the

Re: [openstack-dev] [Manila] Gate breakage and technical FFEs

2015-09-04 Thread Ben Swartzlander
On 09/04/2015 12:36 PM, Ben Swartzlander wrote: The Manila gate is finally unblocked, thanks to the efforts of Valeriy! I see patches going in now so all of the features which were granted technical FFEs should start merging IMMEDIATELY. By my calculations, we lost approximately 30 hours of

[openstack-dev] FFE Request for moving inherited assignment to core in Keystone

2015-09-04 Thread Henry Nash
Keystone has, for a number of releases, supported the concept of inherited role assignments via the OS-INHERIT extension. At the Keystone mid-cycle we agreed moving this to core this was a good target for Liberty, but this was held by needing the data driver testing to be in place

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Status of CI changes

2015-09-04 Thread James Slagle
On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 2:34 AM, Derek Higgins wrote: > Hi All, > > The patch to reshuffle our CI jobs has merged[1], along with the patch to > switch the f21-noha job to be instack based[2] (with centos images). > > So the current status is that our CI has been removed from

[openstack-dev] 9/4 state of the gate

2015-09-04 Thread Matt Riedemann
There are a few things blowing up in the last 24 hours so might as well make people aware. 1. gate-tempest-dsvm-large-ops was failing at a decent rate: https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1491949 Turns out devstack was changed to run multihost=true and that doesn't work so well with the

Re: [openstack-dev] [ptl][release] flushing unreleased client library changes

2015-09-04 Thread Ben Swartzlander
On 09/04/2015 03:21 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: Excerpts from Ben Swartzlander's message of 2015-09-04 14:51:10 -0400: On 09/04/2015 12:39 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: PTLs, We have quite a few unreleased client changes pending, and it would be good to go ahead and publish them so they can be

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] pushing changes through the gate

2015-09-04 Thread Kyle Mestery
I would like to second everything Armando has said below. Please, Neutron core reviewers, follow the advice below for the rest of the Liberty cycle as we work to merge patches targeted at Liberty. I'd also like to thank Armando for jumping in and running things the past week while I was on a

[openstack-dev] [neutron] FFE process for Liberty

2015-09-04 Thread Kyle Mestery
Folks, Armando did a great job targeting things which missed Liberty-3 towards Liberty-RC1 here [1]. For the most part, I hope most of those will land in the coming week or so, so lets work as a team to land those. For things which are not already targeted there (or were targeted by someone else,

Re: [openstack-dev] cloud-init IPv6 support

2015-09-04 Thread Kevin Benton
Right, it depends on your perspective of who 'owns' the API. Is it cloud-init or EC2? At this point I would argue that cloud-init is in control because it would be a large undertaking to switch all of the AMI's on Amazon to something else. However, I know Sean disagrees with me on this point so

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] cloud-init IPv6 support

2015-09-04 Thread Kevin Benton
Thanks for pointing that out. I like the DNS option too. That has to be done carefully though to make sure it's not easy for an attacker to get the name of the DNS entry that the instance tries to look up. On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 10:53 AM, Henry Gessau wrote: > Some thought has

Re: [openstack-dev] This is what disabled-by-policy should look like to the user

2015-09-04 Thread John Griffith
On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 11:35 AM, Mathieu Gagné wrote: > On 2015-09-04 12:50 PM, Monty Taylor wrote: > > On 09/04/2015 10:55 AM, Morgan Fainberg wrote: > >> > >> Obviously the translation of errors > >> would be more difficult if the enforcer is generating messages. > > > >

Re: [openstack-dev] This is what disabled-by-policy should look like to the user

2015-09-04 Thread Morgan Fainberg
On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 10:35 AM, Mathieu Gagné wrote: > On 2015-09-04 12:50 PM, Monty Taylor wrote: > > On 09/04/2015 10:55 AM, Morgan Fainberg wrote: > >> > >> Obviously the translation of errors > >> would be more difficult if the enforcer is generating messages. > > > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][api] New API Guidelines Ready for Cross Project Review

2015-09-04 Thread Everett Toews
On Aug 27, 2015, at 10:48 AM, Everett Toews wrote: > Hi All, > > The following API guidelines are ready for cross project review. They will be > merged on Sept. 4 if there's no further feedback. > > 1. Add description of pagination parameters >

Re: [openstack-dev] This is what disabled-by-policy should look like to the user

2015-09-04 Thread Monty Taylor
On 09/04/2015 01:42 PM, John Griffith wrote: On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 11:35 AM, Mathieu Gagné wrote: On 2015-09-04 12:50 PM, Monty Taylor wrote: On 09/04/2015 10:55 AM, Morgan Fainberg wrote: Obviously the translation of errors would be more difficult if the enforcer is

Re: [openstack-dev] This is what disabled-by-policy should look like to the user

2015-09-04 Thread Mathieu Gagné
On 2015-09-04 2:41 PM, Monty Taylor wrote: > On 09/04/2015 01:42 PM, John Griffith wrote: >> >> ​Is no good? You would like to see "less" in the output; like just the >> command name itself and "Policy doesn't allow"? >> >> To Mathieu's point, fair statement WRT the visibility of the policy name.

Re: [openstack-dev] [ptl][release] flushing unreleased client library changes

2015-09-04 Thread Ihar Hrachyshka
> On 04 Sep 2015, at 18:39, Doug Hellmann wrote: > > > PTLs, > > We have quite a few unreleased client changes pending, and it would > be good to go ahead and publish them so they can be tested as part > of the release candidate process. I have the full list of changes

Re: [openstack-dev] FFE Request for moving inherited assignment to core in Keystone

2015-09-04 Thread Dolph Mathews
-1 Unless there's something more to this, I don't think it's worth any sort of risk to stability just to shuffle API implementations around that can't wait for mikata. On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 12:28 PM, Henry Nash wrote: > Keystone has, for a number of releases,

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] cloud-init IPv6 support

2015-09-04 Thread Fox, Kevin M
Adding a dns server adds more complexity into the mix. You need to support both a dns server and a metadata server at that point. From: Kevin Benton [blak...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, September 04, 2015 1:25 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage

Re: [openstack-dev] [puppet] hosting developer documentation on http://docs.openstack.org/developer/

2015-09-04 Thread Anita Kuno
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 09/04/2015 09:28 AM, Emilien Macchi wrote: > > > On 09/03/2015 03:00 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote: >> >> >> On 09/02/2015 02:56 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote: >>> >>> >>> On 09/02/2015 02:48 PM, Anita Kuno wrote: On 09/02/2015 02:09 PM, Emilien

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Mitaka Design Summit - Proposed slot allocation

2015-09-04 Thread Thierry Carrez
Nikhil Komawar wrote: > No dedicated time slot for cross-project sessions this time around? That's on the Tuesday. 3 parallel sessions all day. In addition, the Ops track runs on Tuesday and Wednesday. -- Thierry Carrez (ttx)

[openstack-dev] [keystone] FFE Request for Reseller

2015-09-04 Thread Henrique Truta
Hi Folks, As you may know, the Reseller Blueprint was proposed and approved in Kilo ( https://review.openstack.org/#/c/139824/) with the developing postponed to Liberty. During this time, the 3 main patches of the chain were split into 8, becoming smaller and easier to review. The first 2 of

Re: [openstack-dev] [docs][networking-sfc]

2015-09-04 Thread Armando M.
On 4 September 2015 at 15:33, Paul Carver wrote: > > Can someone from the Docs team take a look at why there isn't a docs URL > for the networking-sfc repo? > Everything in OpenStack is code driven. And doc publishing happens through code review as much as anything else.

Re: [openstack-dev] 9/4 state of the gate

2015-09-04 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 9/4/2015 3:13 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: There are a few things blowing up in the last 24 hours so might as well make people aware. 1. gate-tempest-dsvm-large-ops was failing at a decent rate: https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1491949 Turns out devstack was changed to run

Re: [openstack-dev] Tracing a request (NOVA)

2015-09-04 Thread Akira Yoshiyama
You may like below: https://gist.github.com/yosshy/5da0c2d6af1b446088bc Akira > Hi, > > I'm trying to trace a request made for an instance and looking at the flow > in the code. > I'm just trying to understand better how the request goes from the > dashboard to the nova-api , to the other

Re: [openstack-dev] This is what disabled-by-policy should look like to the user

2015-09-04 Thread Adam Young
On 09/04/2015 10:04 AM, Monty Taylor wrote: mordred@camelot:~$ neutron net-create test-net-mt Policy doesn't allow create_network to be performed. Thank you neutron. Excellent job. Here's what that looks like at the REST layer: DEBUG: keystoneclient.session RESP: [403] date: Fri, 04 Sep 2015

[openstack-dev] [docs][networking-sfc]

2015-09-04 Thread Paul Carver
Can someone from the Docs team take a look at why there isn't a docs URL for the networking-sfc repo? Compare [1] vs [2] The first URL appears to be a rendering of the docs/source/index.rst from the Neutron Git repo, but the second one gives a Not Found even though there is a

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra][third-party][CI] Third-party oses in devstack-gate

2015-09-04 Thread Evgeny Antyshev
On 01.09.2015 12:28, Evgeny Antyshev wrote: Hello! This letter I address to those third-party CI maintainers who needs to amend the upstream devstack-gate to satisfy their environment. Some folks that I know use inline patching at job level, some make private forks of devstack-gate (I even

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] [Neutron] Allowing DNS suffix to be set per subnet (at least per tenant)

2015-09-04 Thread Ihar Hrachyshka
> On 04 Sep 2015, at 08:14, Daniel Comnea wrote: > > Kevin, > > am i right in saying that the merge above was packaged into Liberty ? > > Any chance to be ported to Juno? > There is no chance a new feature will be backported to any stable branch, even Kilo. At least

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack] [ANN] OpenStack Kilo on Ubuntu fully automated with Ansible! Ready for NFV L2 Bridges via Heat!

2015-09-04 Thread Jose Manuel Ferrer Mosteiro
Hi It is a pre pre pre pre pre pre pre alpha version that just installs the juno ubuntu guide until dashboard included. Block Storage Service is very important but does not work now. vCenter will be always the operating system that makes my life easyer. Today is Ubuntu. The hypervisor is

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] [Neutron] Allowing DNS suffix to be set per subnet (at least per tenant)

2015-09-04 Thread Daniel Comnea
Kevin, am i right in saying that the merge above was packaged into Liberty ? Any chance to be ported to Juno? Cheers, Dani On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 12:21 AM, Kevin Benton wrote: > Support for that blueprint already merged[1] so it's a little late to > change it to

[openstack-dev] What's Up, Doc? 4 September, 2015

2015-09-04 Thread Lana Brindley
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi everyone, This has been a fairly busy week, with Summit preparations beginning, more newly migrated RST books going live, and testing starting on the Install Guide. I've been spending time on sorting out the Liberty blueprints still outstanding,

Re: [openstack-dev] FFE Request for completion of data driven assignment testing in Keystone

2015-09-04 Thread Thierry Carrez
Morgan Fainberg wrote: > >> I would like to request an FFE for the remaining two patches that >> are already in review >> (https://review.openstack.org/#/c/153897/ and >> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/154485/). >> These contain only test code and no functional changes, and >>

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra][third-party][CI] Third-party oses in devstack-gate

2015-09-04 Thread Daniel Mellado
El 04/09/15 a las 08:11, Evgeny Antyshev escribió: > On 01.09.2015 12:28, Evgeny Antyshev wrote: >> Hello! >> >> This letter I address to those third-party CI maintainers who needs >> to amend >> the upstream devstack-gate to satisfy their environment. >> >> Some folks that I know use inline