Re: [openstack-dev] [glance][nova] how to upgrade from v1 to v2?

Excerpts from Mark Voelker's message of 2015-09-25 20:43:23 +: > On Sep 25, 2015, at 1:56 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: > > > > Excerpts from Mark Voelker's message of 2015-09-25 17:42:24 +: > >> On Sep 25, 2015, at 1:24 PM, Brian Rosmaita

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder][neutron][all] New third-party-ci testing requirements for OpenStack Compatible mark

On 25 September 2015 at 15:40, Chris Hoge wrote: > In November, the OpenStack Foundation will start requiring vendors > requesting > new "OpenStack Compatible" storage driver licenses to start passing the > Cinder > third-party integration tests. The new program was

Re: [openstack-dev] [lbaas] [octavia] Proposing new meeting time Wednesday 16:00 UTC

Hi all, Living in France I prefer the previous meeting time (20:00 UTC) regards, On Sat, Sep 26, 2015 at 3:30 AM, Doug Wiegley wrote: > Works for me. > > Doug > > > > On Sep 25, 2015, at 5:58 PM, Eichberger, German < > german.eichber...@hpe.com> wrote: > > > > All,

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron + ovn] Does neutron ovn plugin support to setup multiple neutron networks for one container?

On 09/27/2015 06:50 AM, Kevin Benton wrote: > Assuming it implements the normal provider networks API, you just > specify the segmentation_id when you create the network. > > neutron net-create NET_NAME --provider:network_type vlan > --provider:physical_network physnet1

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron + ovn] Does neutron ovn plugin support to setup multiple neutron networks for one container?

On 09/27/2015 02:26 AM, WANG, Ming Hao (Tony T) wrote: > Russell, > > Thanks for your valuable information. > I understood Geneve is some kind of tunnel format for network virtualization > encapsulation, just like VxLAN. > But I'm still confused by the connection between Geneve and VTEP. > I

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] [puppet] feedback request about puppet-keystone

On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 11:01 AM, Emilien Macchi wrote: > > > So after 5 days, here is a bit of feedback (13 people did the poll [1]): > > 1/ Providers > Except for 1, most of people are managing a few number of Keystone > users/tenants. > I would like to know if it's because

Re: [openstack-dev] [puppet] Fwd: Action required: stackforge/puppet-openstack project move

On 2015-09-27 18:37:59 -0600 (-0600), Matt Fischer wrote: > On Sep 27, 2015 6:09 PM, "Emilien Macchi" wrote: > > > > should we delete it? > > I'm not sure what value it has anymore but why not just readonly? We aren't deleting any repos, just making them read-only and

Re: [openstack-dev] [lbaas] [octavia] Proposing new meeting time Wednesday 16:00 UTC

Is there a lot of people requesting this meeting change? Thanks, Brandon On Fri, 2015-09-25 at 23:58 +, Eichberger, German wrote: > All, > > In our last meeting [1] we discussed moving the meeting earlier to > accommodate participants from the EMEA region. I am therefore proposing to > move

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron + ovn] Does neutron ovn plugin support to setup multiple neutron networks for one container?

Russell and Kevin, Thanks for your detail information! I got it. Thanks again, Tony -Original Message- From: Russell Bryant [mailto:rbry...@redhat.com] Sent: Monday, September 28, 2015 4:18 AM To: Kevin Benton; OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Cc: WANG, Ming

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] should we use fsync when writing iscsi config file?

On 09/26/2015 02:48 AM, Julien Danjou wrote: On Tue, Sep 22 2015, Chris Friesen wrote: On 09/22/2015 05:48 PM, Joshua Harlow wrote: A present: >>> import contextlib >>> import os >>> >>> @contextlib.contextmanager ... def synced_file(path, mode='wb'): ... with open(path, mode) as

[openstack-dev] [puppet] Fwd: Action required: stackforge/puppet-openstack project move

should we delete it? FYI: the module is deprecated in Juno release. I vote for yes. Forwarded Message Subject: Action required: stackforge/puppet-openstack project move Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2015 21:57:10 + From: OpenStack Infrastructure Team

Re: [openstack-dev] [puppet] Fwd: Action required: stackforge/puppet-openstack project move

I'm not sure what value it has anymore but why not just readonly? On Sep 27, 2015 6:09 PM, "Emilien Macchi" wrote: > should we delete it? > > FYI: the module is deprecated in Juno release. > > I vote for yes. > > > Forwarded Message > Subject: Action

[openstack-dev] [oslo][doc] Oslo Doc Sprint final Tally (was Re: [oslo][doc] Oslo doc sprint 9/24-9/25)

Hello, We had a very good Doc Sprint. Thanks everyone who contributed. Finally tally: Merged 88 commits across 20+ repos and gained one core commiter! :) Huge welcome to Brant Knudson. The full list of reviews are at the bottom of the etherpad [1] Thanks, Dims [1]

[openstack-dev] KILO: neutron port-update --allowed-address-pairs action=clear throws an exception

Can anybody highlight why the following command is throwing an exception: *Command#* neutron port-update db3113df-14a3-4d6d-a3c5-d0517a134fc3 --allowed-address-pairs action=clear *Error: * 2015-09-27 21:44:32.144 ERROR neutron.api.v2.resource [req-b1cbe1f2-ba21-4337-a714-f337c54ee9fc admin None]

[openstack-dev] [nova-scheduler] Scheduler sub-group meeting - Agenda 9/21

Meeting on #openstack-meeting-alt at 1400 UTC (8:00AM MDT) 1) Mitaka planning 2) Opens -- Don Dugger "Censeo Toto nos in Kansa esse decisse." - D. Gale Ph: 303/443-3786 __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron + ovn] Does neutron ovn plugin support to setup multiple neutron networks for one container?

Russell, Another question is about "localnet". It is a very useful feature. :-) Is it possible to assign which VLAN tag will be used for a specific provider network? In your example in https://github.com/openvswitch/ovs/commit/c02819293d52f7ea7b714242d871b2b01f57f905 : "physnet1" is used as

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron + ovn] Does neutron ovn plugin support to setup multiple neutron networks for one container?

Russell, Thanks for your valuable information. I understood Geneve is some kind of tunnel format for network virtualization encapsulation, just like VxLAN. But I'm still confused by the connection between Geneve and VTEP. I suppose VTEP should be on behalf of "VxLAN Tunnel Endpoint", which

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] -1 due to line length violation in commit messages

As a core (and former PTL) I just ignored commit message -1s unless there is something majorly wrong (no bug id where one is needed, etc). I appreciate well formatted commits, but can we let this one go? This discussion is so far into the meta-bike-shedding (bike shedding about bike shedding

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron + ovn] Does neutron ovn plugin support to setup multiple neutron networks for one container?

Assuming it implements the normal provider networks API, you just specify the segmentation_id when you create the network. neutron net-create NET_NAME --provider:network_type vlan --provider:physical_network physnet1 --provider:segmentation_id VLAN_TAG On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 9:50 AM, WANG, Ming