Greetings!
I have prepared mock-ups[1],[2] to build Zaqar UI, at present focusing only
to bring pools and flavors on dashboard. Sharing two mock-ups for same
purpose - allowing all operations related to them(CRUD).
It will be great to know the views of zaqar developers/users if the design
is
On Oct 9, 2015, at 7:05 PM, Tristan Cacqueray wrote:
> Please join me in congratulating the 6 newly elected members of the TC.
>
> * Doug Hellmann (dhellmann)
> * Monty Taylor (mordred)
> * Anne Gentle (annegentle)
> * Sean Dague (sdague)
> * Russell Bryant (russellb)
> *
On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 8:07 AM, Boris Bobrov wrote:
> On Saturday 10 October 2015 08:42:10 Shinobu Kinjo wrote:
> > So what's the procedure?
>
> You go to #openstack-keystone on Friday, choose a bug, talk to someone of
> the
> core reviewers. After talking to them fix the
Congratulations to the newly elected members of the TC, and thanks to all who
ran for election, Mike, Joe, Clint, Steven, Joshua, Julien, Ed, Edgar, Carol,
Justin, Rochelle and Maish!
Thanks to Tristan and the rest of the election team for a smooth process. Now,
on to Mitaka!
-amrith
>
There are some modules that are not tested (no beaker & no integration CI).
I'm not sure it's a good idea to include them in 7.0.0 release.
Modules affected:
* gnocchi
* mistral
* murano
* aodh
* barbican
* zaqar
* tuskar
If someone wants a 7.0.0 release for these modules, please push some
Hi folks,
We have had about five new ATCs to Kolla over the last month. The four biggest
impact areas for new contributors to make an improvement in the code is related
to:
* Documentation
* Functional gating
* Docker containers
* Ansible roles for the Docker containers
I
I'm curious is there any more detail about #1 below anywhere online?
Does cassandra use some features of the JVM that the openJDK version
doesn't support? Something else?
-Josh
Thomas Goirand wrote:
On 10/07/2015 07:36 PM, Ed Leafe wrote:
Several months ago I proposed an experiment [0] to
Adrian,
What I suggest is to commit a table of contents for a new comprehensive user
guide. Then new contributors can put stuff there instead of the quick start
guide. Any complexity in the quick start guide can also be transitioned into
the comprehensive user guide.
So who is going to do
On 10/07/2015 07:36 PM, Ed Leafe wrote:
> Several months ago I proposed an experiment [0] to see if switching
> the data model for the Nova scheduler to use Cassandra as the backend
> would be a significant improvement as opposed to the current design
This is probably right. I don't know, I'm not
+1 for both so +2 :)
-Chris
On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 4:26 PM, Jay Faulkner wrote:
> +1
>
>
> From: Jim Rollenhagen
> Sent: Thursday, October 8, 2015 2:47 PM
> To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
> Subject:
Thomas,
i am curious as well. AFAIK, cassandra works well with OpenJDK. Can you
please elaborate what you concerns are for #1?
Thanks,
Dims
On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 5:43 PM, Joshua Harlow
wrote:
> I'm curious is there any more detail about #1 below anywhere online?
>
>
Not implying cassandra is the right option. Just curious about the
assertion.
-- Dims
On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 5:53 PM, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
> Thomas,
>
> i am curious as well. AFAIK, cassandra works well with OpenJDK. Can you
> please elaborate what you concerns are for
Hi all,
As you know, openstack projects are developed separately. And
theoretically, people can create networks with Neutron in Kilo version for
Nova in Havana version.
Did Anyone tried it?
Do we have some pages to show what combination can work together?
Thanks.
Germy
.
Hi all,
After restarting, Agents load data from Neutron via RPC. What about 3-rd
controller? They only can re-gather data via NBI. Right?
Is it possible to provide some mechanism for those controllers and agents
to sync data? or something else I missed?
Thanks
Germy
On 10/09/2015 07:29 PM, Clint Byrum wrote:
Even if you figured out how to make the in-memory scheduler crazy fast,
There's still value in concurrency for other reasons. No matter how
fast you make the scheduler, you'll be slave to the response time of
a single scheduling request. If you take
Hi Michael,
and thank you for your answer.
Indeed, what I want to do is to add methods to the ImageCache.py module
(listing, adding, deleting). So far, this module only takes care of image
deletion: this represents the "cache" of images. Now, I want to populate
the cache with some images on the
help for test__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Hi,
Thanks for the initiative, David.
Putting more focus on solving bugs is a great idea, as it will both improve
the
stability of the project and help new contributors to get involved.
Count me in!
Regards,
Samuel
On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 12:11 AM, Adam Young wrote:
> On
Meters are measurable value. So it cannot be a string.
If you really need to have notifications about event that is exist but
cannot be measured you can use Events.
http://docs.openstack.org/admin-guide-cloud/telemetry-events.html
Cheers,
Igor Degtiarov
Software Engineer
Mirantis Inc.
Meters are measurable value. So it cannot be a string.
If you really need to have notifications about event that is exist but
cannot be measured you can use Events.
http://docs.openstack.org/admin-guide-cloud/telemetry-events.html
Cheers,
Igor Degtiarov
Software Engineer
Mirantis Inc.
On 2015-10-09 18:51:51 + (+), Tim Bell wrote:
> There is a need to distinguish between server side py26 support
> which is generally under the control of the service provider and
> py26 support on the client side. For a service provider to push
> all of their hypervisors and service
Personally, I¹d still vote for feature branching: I¹d really love to see
an Angular Panels feature branch worked on separately and then merged back
in; effectively, Travis¹ 2nd option. Pick 3(?) panels, like Users, Images,
and the System Information one I¹ve seen around, iterate quickly, merge in
So what's the procedure?
Shinobu
- Original Message -
From: "Adam Young"
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Sent: Saturday, October 10, 2015 12:11:35 PM
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] Let's get together and fix all the bugs
On 10/09/2015 11:04 PM, Chen,
On 2015-10-09 23:13:48 + (+), Fox, Kevin M wrote:
> On 2015-10-09 22:20:43 + (+), Amrith Kumar wrote:
> [...]
> > A google search produced this as result #2.
> >
> > http://governance.openstack.org/reference/projects/index.html
> >
> > Looks pretty complete to me.
>
> The
All right, thanks for responses, will code accordingly :)
On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 9:31 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
> Excerpts from Steve Martinelli's message of 2015-10-06 16:09:32 -0400:
> >
> > Using `message flavor` works for me, and having two words is just fine.
>
> It
On 2015-10-09 17:10:15 -0500 (-0500), Ben Nemec wrote:
> As discussed in the meeting a week or two ago, we would like to bring
> back the auto-abandon functionality for old, unloved gerrit reviews.
[...]
> -WIP patches are never abandoned
[...]
> -Patches that are failing CI for over a month on
26 matches
Mail list logo