Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][all] The lock files saga (and where we can go from here)

2015-11-30 Thread Ben Nemec
On 11/30/2015 02:15 PM, Sean Dague wrote: > On 11/30/2015 03:01 PM, Robert Collins wrote: >> On 1 December 2015 at 08:37, Ben Nemec wrote: >>> On 11/30/2015 12:42 PM, Joshua Harlow wrote: Hi all, I just wanted to bring up an issue, possible solution and get

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][all] The lock files saga (and where we can go from here)

2015-11-30 Thread Joshua Harlow
Ben Nemec wrote: On 11/30/2015 02:15 PM, Sean Dague wrote: On 11/30/2015 03:01 PM, Robert Collins wrote: On 1 December 2015 at 08:37, Ben Nemec wrote: On 11/30/2015 12:42 PM, Joshua Harlow wrote: Hi all, I just wanted to bring up an issue, possible solution and get

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO/heat] openstack debug command

2015-11-30 Thread Steven Hardy
On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 08:47:20AM +1300, Steve Baker wrote: > On 30/11/15 23:21, Steven Hardy wrote: > >On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 10:03:29AM +0100, Lennart Regebro wrote: > >>I'm tasked to implement a command that shows error messages when a > >>deployment has failed. I have a vague memory of

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo][ironic][heat] Adding back the tripleo check job

2015-11-30 Thread Steven Hardy
On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 03:19:18PM +, Derek Higgins wrote: > Hi All, > > A few months tripleo switch from its devtest based CI to one that was > based on instack. Before doing this we anticipated disruption in the ci jobs > and removed them from non tripleo projects. > > We'd like to

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra] IRC Bot issues

2015-11-30 Thread Jeremy Stanley
On 2015-11-30 19:54:33 + (+), Paul Michali wrote: > Check out https://freenode.net/irc_servers.shtml which lists the servers. I > was using irc.freenode.net. Switched to weber.freenode.net and able to > connect. > > (now everyone will hop on that one and I'll have to pick another :)

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo][ironic][heat] Adding back the tripleo check job

2015-11-30 Thread Steve Baker
On 01/12/15 04:19, Derek Higgins wrote: Hi All, A few months tripleo switch from its devtest based CI to one that was based on instack. Before doing this we anticipated disruption in the ci jobs and removed them from non tripleo projects. We'd like to investigate adding it back to

[openstack-dev] [TripleO/heat] openstack debug command

2015-11-30 Thread Lennart Regebro
I'm tasked to implement a command that shows error messages when a deployment has failed. I have a vague memory of having seen scripts that do something like this, if that exists, can somebody point me in teh right direction? Any opinions on what that should do, specifically? Traverse failed

Re: [openstack-dev] [release] using reno for libraries

2015-11-30 Thread Dmitry Tantsur
On 11/28/2015 02:48 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: Excerpts from Doug Hellmann's message of 2015-11-27 10:21:36 -0500: Liaisons, We're making good progress on adding reno to service projects as we head to the Mitaka-1 milestone. Thank you! We also need to add reno to all of the other deliverables

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][vpnaas] "SKIPPED: Neutron support is required" while running tox

2015-11-30 Thread Ihar Hrachyshka
bharath wrote: Hi, when running tox "sudo -u stack -H tox -e api neutron.tests.api.test_vpnaas_extensions" test cases are failing with Error " setUpClass (neutron.tests.api.test_vpnaas_extensions.VPNaaSTestJSON) ... SKIPPED: Neutron support is required" I even

[openstack-dev] [Magnum] Liberty RPMs for RDO

2015-11-30 Thread Mathieu Velten
Hi, Let me first introduce myself : I am currently working at CERN to help evaluate and deploy Magnum. In this regard Ricardo recently sends an email regarding Puppet modules, this one is about RPMs of Magnum for CentOS with RDO. You can find here a repository containing the source and binary

[openstack-dev] IRC Bot issues

2015-11-30 Thread Joshua Hesketh
Hi all, Freenode are currently experiencing a severe DDoS attack that are having an effect on our bots. As such the meetbot, irc logging and gerrit watcher are interminably available. We expect the bots to resume their normal function once Freenode has recovered. For now, meetings may have to be

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder]Do we have project scope for cinder?

2015-11-30 Thread hao wang
Hi, Duncan 2015-11-30 15:54 GMT+08:00 Duncan Thomas : > Hi WangHao > > This was quite thoroughly discussed during the early discussions on > replication. The general statement was 'not yet'. Getting any kind of > workable replication API has proven to be very, very

[openstack-dev] [nova][RFC] delete instance device

2015-11-30 Thread 少合冯
Hi all, I'd like to talk about the delete instance device of nova. Here is the libvirt doc string to describe it underly function detachDeviceFlags. http://paste.openstack.org/show/480330/ It says: detaching a device from a running domain may be asynchronous. *and it suggests:* To check

Re: [openstack-dev] 答复: [congress]role in Congress

2015-11-30 Thread Masahito MUROI
Hi Yali, I'm not sure which your concern is about UI by Horizon or for a policy in Congress. On 2015/11/30 16:27, zhangyali (D) wrote: Hi Tim, In the implementation of Congress UI, I have realized that we need to add role assignment. In many systems and cases, RBAC (Role-Based Access

Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Autoscaling both clusters and containers

2015-11-30 Thread Peng Zhao
Ryan, That's where Hyper could help. This blog talks about wasted capacity issue and the solution: http://thenewstack.io/hypernetes-brings-multi-tenancy-microservices/ Best Peng - Hyper - Make VM run like Container On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO/heat] openstack debug command

2015-11-30 Thread Steven Hardy
On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 10:03:29AM +0100, Lennart Regebro wrote: > I'm tasked to implement a command that shows error messages when a > deployment has failed. I have a vague memory of having seen scripts > that do something like this, if that exists, can somebody point me in > teh right direction?

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra] IRC Bot issues

2015-11-30 Thread Jeremy Stanley
On 2015-11-30 20:49:46 +1100 (+1100), Joshua Hesketh wrote: > Freenode are currently experiencing a severe DDoS attack that are > having an effect on our bots. As such the meetbot, irc logging and > gerrit watcher are interminably available. > > We expect the bots to resume their normal function

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] notification subteam meeting

2015-11-30 Thread Balázs Gibizer
Hi, The next meeting of the nova notification subteam will happen 2015-12-01 Tuesday 20:00 UTC [1] on #openstack-meeting-alt on freenode Agenda: - Status of the outstanding specs and code reviews - Mid-cycle - AOB See you there. Cheers, Gibi [1]

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic] Do we need to have a mid-cycle?

2015-11-30 Thread Anita Kuno
On 11/23/2015 01:00 PM, Jim Rollenhagen wrote: > On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 06:05:54AM -0800, Jim Rollenhagen wrote: >> >> Another idea I floated last week was to do a virtual midcycle of sorts. >> Treat it like a normal midcycle in that everyone tells their management >> "I'm out for 3-4 days for

Re: [openstack-dev] [release] using reno for libraries

2015-11-30 Thread Dmitry Tantsur
On 11/30/2015 05:14 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: Excerpts from Dmitry Tantsur's message of 2015-11-30 10:06:25 +0100: On 11/28/2015 02:48 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: Excerpts from Doug Hellmann's message of 2015-11-27 10:21:36 -0500: Liaisons, We're making good progress on adding reno to service

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo][ironic][heat] Adding back the tripleo check job

2015-11-30 Thread Dmitry Tantsur
On 11/30/2015 04:19 PM, Derek Higgins wrote: Hi All, A few months tripleo switch from its devtest based CI to one that was based on instack. Before doing this we anticipated disruption in the ci jobs and removed them from non tripleo projects. We'd like to investigate adding it back

[openstack-dev] [mistral] Team meeting minutes - 11/30/2015

2015-11-30 Thread Anastasia Kuznetsova
Thanks everyone for joining us! Meeting minutes: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/mistral/2015/mistral.2015-11-30-16.01.html Meeting log: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/mistral/2015/mistral.2015-11-30-16.01.log.html -- Best regards, Anastasia Kuznetsova

[openstack-dev] [keystone] Removing functionality that was deprecated in Kilo and upcoming deprecated functionality in Mitaka

2015-11-30 Thread Steve Martinelli
In the Mitaka release, the keystone team will be removing functionality that was marked for deprecation in Kilo, and marking certain functions as deprecated in Mitaka (that may be removed in at least 2 cycles). removing deprecated functionality = This is not a full list, but

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] Announcing Third Party CI for Proliant iLO Drivers

2015-11-30 Thread Anita Kuno
On 11/30/2015 11:25 AM, Gururaj Grandhi wrote: > Hi, > > > > This is to announce that we have setup a Third Party CI environment > for Proliant iLO Drivers. The results will be posted under "HP Proliant CI > check" section in Non-voting mode. We will be running the basic deploy >

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo][ironic][heat] Adding back the tripleo check job

2015-11-30 Thread Lucas Alvares Gomes
I'm +1 for re-enabling it in Ironic. I think ironic plays a big role in the tripleo puzzle so we should be aware of breakages in the tripleo project. On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 3:19 PM, Derek Higgins wrote: > Hi All, > > A few months tripleo switch from its devtest based CI

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] Announcing Third Party CI for Proliant iLO Drivers

2015-11-30 Thread Dmitry Tantsur
On 11/30/2015 05:34 PM, Anita Kuno wrote: On 11/30/2015 11:25 AM, Gururaj Grandhi wrote: Hi, This is to announce that we have setup a Third Party CI environment for Proliant iLO Drivers. The results will be posted under "HP Proliant CI check" section in Non-voting mode. We will

Re: [openstack-dev] Encouraging first-time contributors through bug tags/reviews

2015-11-30 Thread Doug Hellmann
Excerpts from sean roberts's message of 2015-11-30 07:57:54 -0800: > How about: > First timers assign a bug to a mentor and the mentor takes responsibility > for the first timer learning from the bug to completion. That would mean the learning process is different from what we want the regular

[openstack-dev] [ironic] Announcing Third Party CI for Proliant iLO Drivers

2015-11-30 Thread Gururaj Grandhi
Hi, This is to announce that we have setup a Third Party CI environment for Proliant iLO Drivers. The results will be posted under "HP Proliant CI check" section in Non-voting mode. We will be running the basic deploy tests for iscsi_ilo and agent_ilo drivers for the check queue.

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder]Do we have project scope for cinder?

2015-11-30 Thread Walter A. Boring IV
As a side note to the DR discussion here, there was a session in Tokyo that talked about a new DR project called Smaug. You can see their mission statement here: https://launchpad.net/smaug https://github.com/openstack/smaug There is another service in the making called DRagon:

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo][ironic][heat] Adding back the tripleo check job

2015-11-30 Thread Derek Higgins
On 30/11/15 17:03, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: On 11/30/2015 04:19 PM, Derek Higgins wrote: Hi All, A few months tripleo switch from its devtest based CI to one that was based on instack. Before doing this we anticipated disruption in the ci jobs and removed them from non tripleo projects.

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] Announcing Third Party CI for Proliant iLO Drivers

2015-11-30 Thread Anita Kuno
On 11/30/2015 12:17 PM, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: > On 11/30/2015 05:34 PM, Anita Kuno wrote: >> On 11/30/2015 11:25 AM, Gururaj Grandhi wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> >>> >>> This is to announce that we have setup a Third Party CI >>> environment >>> for Proliant iLO Drivers. The results will be

[openstack-dev] [tripleo][ironic][heat] Adding back the tripleo check job

2015-11-30 Thread Derek Higgins
Hi All, A few months tripleo switch from its devtest based CI to one that was based on instack. Before doing this we anticipated disruption in the ci jobs and removed them from non tripleo projects. We'd like to investigate adding it back to heat and ironic as these are the two

Re: [openstack-dev] Encouraging first-time contributors through bug tags/reviews

2015-11-30 Thread sean roberts
How about: First timers assign a bug to a mentor and the mentor takes responsibility for the first timer learning from the bug to completion. Per project, a few people volunteer themselves as mentors. As easy as responding to [project][mentor] emails. On Monday, November 30, 2015, Sean Dague

Re: [openstack-dev] [release] using reno for libraries

2015-11-30 Thread Doug Hellmann
Excerpts from Dmitry Tantsur's message of 2015-11-30 10:06:25 +0100: > On 11/28/2015 02:48 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: > > Excerpts from Doug Hellmann's message of 2015-11-27 10:21:36 -0500: > >> Liaisons, > >> > >> We're making good progress on adding reno to service projects as > >> we head to the

[openstack-dev] [Glance] PSA: Today's Artifacts meeting canceled.

2015-11-30 Thread Nikhil Komawar
Hi all, There was some bot issue this morning and all the meeting commands weren't working hence. We canceled the Artifacts meeting after ~20 mins however, there was a lot of informal chatting on the #openstack-meeting-4 channel during the wait (no significant decisions taken, and there are

Re: [openstack-dev] [Performance] Filling performance team working items list and taking part in their resolving

2015-11-30 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 11/27/2015 3:54 AM, Dina Belova wrote: Hey OpenStack devs and operators! Folks, I would like to share list of working items Performance Team is currently having in the backlog - https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/perf-zoom-zoom [Work Items to grab] section. I'm really encouraging you to fill

Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon] Supporting Django 1.9

2015-11-30 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 11/29/2015 08:59 PM, Rob Cresswell (rcresswe) wrote: > https://blueprints.launchpad.net/horizon/+spec/drop-dj17 > > > This is where changes are currently being tracked. I don’t quite > understand why these would be back ported; they would break Liberty with > 1.7. Perhaps we can discuss on

[openstack-dev] [Neutron] Automatically generate sample configuration files (oslo config generator)

2015-11-30 Thread Martin Hickey
Hi, The generation of Neutron configuration files using the oslo config generator is being introduced in Mitaka as part of blueprint [1] and bug [2]. This is broken down into two phases: Neutron core and Neutron *aaS projects. The first part of the first phase is the generation of sample core

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra] IRC Bot issues

2015-11-30 Thread Clark, Jay
Can't connect either. Dead in the water Regards, Jay Clark Sr. OpenStack Deployment Engineer E: jason.t.cl...@hpe.com H: 919.341.4670 M: 919.345.1127 IRC (freenode): jasondotstar From: lichen.hangzhou [lichen.hangz...@gmail.com]

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder]Do we have project scope for cinder?

2015-11-30 Thread yang, xing
Hi Wang Hao, Here¹s a Cinder spec in review on replicating a group of volumes: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/229722/ It is a not an easy problem to solve. Not that we should rush on this problem, but we should start thinking about how to solve this as some backends can only replicate a CG

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder]Do we have project scope for cinder?

2015-11-30 Thread Anita Kuno
On 11/29/2015 02:02 PM, Sean McGinnis wrote: > On Sun, Nov 29, 2015 at 11:44:19AM +, Dulko, Michal wrote: >> On Sat, 2015-11-28 at 10:56 +0800, hao wang wrote: >>> Hi guys, >>> >>> I notice nova have a clarification of project scope: >>>

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova]New Quota Subteam on Nova

2015-11-30 Thread melanie witt
On Nov 26, 2015, at 9:36, John Garbutt wrote: > A suggestion in the past, that I like, is creating a nova functional > test that stress tests the quota code. > > Hopefully that will be able to help reproduce the error. > That should help prove if any proposed fix actually

Re: [openstack-dev] [release] using reno for libraries

2015-11-30 Thread Doug Hellmann
Excerpts from Dmitry Tantsur's message of 2015-11-30 17:58:45 +0100: > On 11/30/2015 05:14 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: > > Excerpts from Dmitry Tantsur's message of 2015-11-30 10:06:25 +0100: > >> On 11/28/2015 02:48 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: > >>> Excerpts from Doug Hellmann's message of 2015-11-27

[openstack-dev] [oslo][all] The lock files saga (and where we can go from here)

2015-11-30 Thread Joshua Harlow
Hi all, I just wanted to bring up an issue, possible solution and get feedback on it from folks because it seems to be an on-going problem that shows up not when an application is initially deployed but as on-going operation and running of that application proceeds (ie after running for a

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Nova mid cycle details

2015-11-30 Thread Murray, Paul (HP Cloud)
The rates are listed on the hotel information page on that site. All include tax and breakfast. Paul From: Michael Still [mailto:mi...@stillhq.com] Sent: 28 November 2015 04:39 To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Nova mid cycle

[openstack-dev] [Infra] Meeting Tuesday December 1st at 19:00 UTC

2015-11-30 Thread Elizabeth K. Joseph
Hi everyone, The OpenStack Infrastructure (Infra) team is having our next weekly meeting on Tuesday December 1st, at 19:00 UTC in #openstack-meeting Meeting agenda available here: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/InfraTeamMeeting#Agenda_for_next_meeting Anyone is welcome to to add

Re: [openstack-dev] [Performance] Filling performance team working items list and taking part in their resolving

2015-11-30 Thread Dina Belova
Matt, I guess it's good solution. Thanks for doing that! Cheers, Dina On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 6:30 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: > > > On 11/27/2015 3:54 AM, Dina Belova wrote: > >> Hey OpenStack devs and operators! >> >> Folks, I would like to share list of working

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Call for review focus

2015-11-30 Thread Carl Baldwin
++ On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 3:05 PM, Assaf Muller wrote: > On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 7:02 AM, Rossella Sblendido > wrote: >> >> >> On 11/20/2015 03:54 AM, Armando M. wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> On 19 November 2015 at 18:26, Assaf Muller >>

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][glance] Add Sabari Kumar Murugesan <smuruge...@vmware.com>

2015-11-30 Thread Ian Cordasco
On 11/23/15, 14:20, "Flavio Percoco" wrote: >Greetings, > >I'd like to propose adding Sabari Kumar Murugesan to the glance-core >team. Sabari has been contributing for quite a bit to the project with >great reviews and he's also been providing great feedback in matters

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Call for review focus

2015-11-30 Thread Carl Baldwin
On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 4:47 AM, Rossella Sblendido wrote: >> I looked for the address scopes blueprint [1] which is targeted for >> Mitaka-1 [2] and there are 6 (or 5, one is in the gate) patches on the >> bp/address-scopes topic [3]. It isn't obvious to me yet

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] Announcing Third Party CI for Proliant iLO Drivers

2015-11-30 Thread Dmitry Tantsur
On 11/30/2015 06:24 PM, Anita Kuno wrote: On 11/30/2015 12:17 PM, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: On 11/30/2015 05:34 PM, Anita Kuno wrote: On 11/30/2015 11:25 AM, Gururaj Grandhi wrote: Hi, This is to announce that we have setup a Third Party CI environment for Proliant iLO Drivers. The

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] Announcing Third Party CI for Proliant iLO Drivers

2015-11-30 Thread Anita Kuno
On 11/30/2015 12:33 PM, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: > On 11/30/2015 06:24 PM, Anita Kuno wrote: >> On 11/30/2015 12:17 PM, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: >>> On 11/30/2015 05:34 PM, Anita Kuno wrote: On 11/30/2015 11:25 AM, Gururaj Grandhi wrote: > Hi, > > > >This is to announce

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo][ironic][heat] Adding back the tripleo check job

2015-11-30 Thread Ruby Loo
On 30 November 2015 at 10:19, Derek Higgins wrote: > Hi All, > > A few months tripleo switch from its devtest based CI to one that was > based on instack. Before doing this we anticipated disruption in the ci > jobs and removed them from non tripleo projects. > > We'd

[openstack-dev] [Sahara] Debugging via PyCharm (pydevd)

2015-11-30 Thread Chad Roberts
I submitted a bug (https://bugs.launchpad.net/sahara/+bug/1521266) and have asked in-channel, but I'll also post here just in case it rings a bell for someone. Recently, Sahara was changed to use oslo.service to launch our wsgi api server. Prior to that change, I was able to successfully run and

[openstack-dev] [keystone][all] keystone-spec proposal freeze date and using roll call instead of +2/+2/+A for specs

2015-11-30 Thread Steve Martinelli
As a reminder: keystone spec freeze date is the end of mitaka-1 (this friday), any spec being proposed for mitaka will have to go through an exception process next week. For the next keystone meeting (tomorrow) I'd like to propose we use a roll call / vote mechanism on each open specs that is

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra] IRC Bot issues

2015-11-30 Thread Paul Michali
Check out https://freenode.net/irc_servers.shtml which lists the servers. I was using irc.freenode.net. Switched to weber.freenode.net and able to connect. (now everyone will hop on that one and I'll have to pick another :) On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 2:46 PM Clark, Jay

Re: [openstack-dev] [puppet] [ceph] Puppet Ceph CI

2015-11-30 Thread David Moreau Simard
Hey Adam, A bit late here, sorry. Ceph works fine with OpenStack Kilo but at the time we developed the integration tests for puppet-ceph with Kilo, there were some issues specific to our test implementation and we chose to settle with Juno at the time. On the topic of CI, I can no longer sponsor

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][all] The lock files saga (and where we can go from here)

2015-11-30 Thread Robert Collins
On 1 December 2015 at 08:37, Ben Nemec wrote: > On 11/30/2015 12:42 PM, Joshua Harlow wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I just wanted to bring up an issue, possible solution and get feedback >> on it from folks because it seems to be an on-going problem that shows >> up not when an

[openstack-dev] [ironic] weekly subteam status report

2015-11-30 Thread Ruby Loo
Hi, We are elated to present this week's subteam report for Ironic. As usual, this is pulled directly from the Ironic whiteboard[0] and formatted. Bugs (dtantsur) === (diff with Nov 23) - Open: 174 (+3). 11 new, 60 in progress, 0 critical, 16 high and 11 incomplete - Nova bugs

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][all] The lock files saga (and where we can go from here)

2015-11-30 Thread Clint Byrum
Excerpts from Joshua Harlow's message of 2015-11-30 10:42:53 -0800: > Hi all, > > I just wanted to bring up an issue, possible solution and get feedback > on it from folks because it seems to be an on-going problem that shows > up not when an application is initially deployed but as on-going >

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Versioned notifications... who cares about the version?

2015-11-30 Thread Andrew Laski
On 11/30/15 at 07:32am, Sean Dague wrote: On 11/24/2015 10:09 AM, John Garbutt wrote: On 24 November 2015 at 15:00, Balázs Gibizer wrote: From: Andrew Laski [mailto:and...@lascii.com] Sent: November 24, 2015 15:35 On 11/24/15 at 10:26am, Balázs Gibizer wrote:

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][all] The lock files saga (and where we can go from here)

2015-11-30 Thread Ben Nemec
On 11/30/2015 12:42 PM, Joshua Harlow wrote: > Hi all, > > I just wanted to bring up an issue, possible solution and get feedback > on it from folks because it seems to be an on-going problem that shows > up not when an application is initially deployed but as on-going > operation and running

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO/heat] openstack debug command

2015-11-30 Thread Steve Baker
On 30/11/15 23:21, Steven Hardy wrote: On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 10:03:29AM +0100, Lennart Regebro wrote: I'm tasked to implement a command that shows error messages when a deployment has failed. I have a vague memory of having seen scripts that do something like this, if that exists, can

Re: [openstack-dev] Encouraging first-time contributors through bug tags/reviews

2015-11-30 Thread sean roberts
Being successful at your first patch for most people means that their first effort is different than an a regular patch. Identifying abandoned work more quickly is good. It doesn't help the first timer. Tagging low hanging fruit for first timers I like. I'm recommending we add a mentor as part

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][all] The lock files saga (and where we can go from here)

2015-11-30 Thread Joshua Harlow
Ben Nemec wrote: On 11/30/2015 12:42 PM, Joshua Harlow wrote: Hi all, I just wanted to bring up an issue, possible solution and get feedback on it from folks because it seems to be an on-going problem that shows up not when an application is initially deployed but as on-going operation and

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][all] The lock files saga (and where we can go from here)

2015-11-30 Thread Sean Dague
On 11/30/2015 03:01 PM, Robert Collins wrote: > On 1 December 2015 at 08:37, Ben Nemec wrote: >> On 11/30/2015 12:42 PM, Joshua Harlow wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> I just wanted to bring up an issue, possible solution and get feedback >>> on it from folks because it seems to

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Getting rid of Docker containers on the Fuel master node

2015-11-30 Thread Fox, Kevin M
Is that because of trying to shoehorn docker containers into rpm's though? I've never seen anyone else try and use them that way. Maybe they belong in a docker repo like the hub or something openstack.org hosted instead? Thanks, Kevin From: Igor

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][all] The lock files saga (and where we can go from here)

2015-11-30 Thread Joshua Harlow
Joshua Harlow wrote: Ben Nemec wrote: On 11/30/2015 12:42 PM, Joshua Harlow wrote: Hi all, I just wanted to bring up an issue, possible solution and get feedback on it from folks because it seems to be an on-going problem that shows up not when an application is initially deployed but as

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][all] The lock files saga (and where we can go from here)

2015-11-30 Thread Joshua Harlow
Clint Byrum wrote: Excerpts from Joshua Harlow's message of 2015-11-30 10:42:53 -0800: Hi all, I just wanted to bring up an issue, possible solution and get feedback on it from folks because it seems to be an on-going problem that shows up not when an application is initially deployed but as

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][all] The lock files saga (and where we can go from here)

2015-11-30 Thread Joshua Harlow
Sean Dague wrote: On 11/30/2015 03:01 PM, Robert Collins wrote: On 1 December 2015 at 08:37, Ben Nemec wrote: On 11/30/2015 12:42 PM, Joshua Harlow wrote: Hi all, I just wanted to bring up an issue, possible solution and get feedback on it from folks because it seems

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][all] The lock files saga (and where we can go from here)

2015-11-30 Thread Ben Nemec
On 11/30/2015 01:57 PM, Joshua Harlow wrote: > Ben Nemec wrote: >> On 11/30/2015 12:42 PM, Joshua Harlow wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> I just wanted to bring up an issue, possible solution and get feedback >>> on it from folks because it seems to be an on-going problem that shows >>> up not when an

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][all] The lock files saga (and where we can go from here)

2015-11-30 Thread Joshua Harlow
Sean Dague wrote: On 11/30/2015 03:01 PM, Robert Collins wrote: On 1 December 2015 at 08:37, Ben Nemec wrote: On 11/30/2015 12:42 PM, Joshua Harlow wrote: Hi all, I just wanted to bring up an issue, possible solution and get feedback on it from folks because it seems

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] Third Party CI Deadlines for Mitaka and N

2015-11-30 Thread Anita Kuno
On 11/30/2015 08:00 PM, Mike Perez wrote: > On October 28th 2015 at the Ironic Third Party CI summit session [1], there > was > consensus by the Ironic core and participating vendors that the set of > deadlines will be: > > * Mitaka-2ː Driver teams will have registered their intent to run CI by

[openstack-dev] [cross-project] Cross-project Liaisons

2015-11-30 Thread Mike Perez
Hello all, Currently for cross-project specs, the author of the spec spends the time to explain why a certain feature makes sense to be across multiple projects. This also includes giving technical solutions for it working with a variety of services and making sure everyone is happy. Today we

[openstack-dev] [midonet] midonet weekly irc meeting

2015-11-30 Thread Ryu Ishimoto
Hi All! We would like to start holding a weekly IRC meeting for midonet, and we want to propose the meeting time of 9:00 UTC on Tuesdays. Please let me know if anyone prefers different time. Best, Ryu __ OpenStack

[openstack-dev] [telemetry][aodh] The purpose of notification about alarm updating

2015-11-30 Thread liusheng
Hi folks, Currently, a notification message will be emitted when updating an alarm (state transition, attribute updating, creation), this functionality was added by change[1], but the change didn't describe any purpose. So I wonder whether there is any usage of this type of notification, we

[openstack-dev] Cross-Project meeting, Tue Dec 1st, 21:00 UTC & *New Location*

2015-11-30 Thread Mike Perez
Dear PTLs, cross-project liaisons and anyone else interested, We'll have a cross-project meeting December 1st at 21:00 UTC in the NEW #openstack-meeting-cp IRC channel, with the following agenda: * Review past action items * Team announcements (horizontal, vertical, diagonal) * backwards compat

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO/heat] openstack debug command

2015-11-30 Thread Steve Baker
On 01/12/15 10:28, Steven Hardy wrote: On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 08:47:20AM +1300, Steve Baker wrote: On 30/11/15 23:21, Steven Hardy wrote: On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 10:03:29AM +0100, Lennart Regebro wrote: I'm tasked to implement a command that shows error messages when a deployment has failed.

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder]Do we have project scope for cinder?

2015-11-30 Thread hao wang
Thank you Walter for those information. Yes, I knew Smaug, actually I was one of speakers in this session :). This project was started by my colleague, Eran Gampel. AFAIK, resources in Cinder(volumes, etc.) is considered as one of protection objects in it. So we can see there are more and more

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo][ironic][heat] Adding back the tripleo check job

2015-11-30 Thread Steven Hardy
On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 12:51:53PM -0500, Ruby Loo wrote: >On 30 November 2015 at 10:19, Derek Higgins wrote: > > Hi All, > >     A few months tripleo switch from its devtest based CI to one that > was based on instack. Before doing this we anticipated

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo][ironic][heat] Adding back the tripleo check job

2015-11-30 Thread Devananda van der Veen
On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 3:07 PM, Zane Bitter wrote: > On 30/11/15 12:51, Ruby Loo wrote: > >> >> >> On 30 November 2015 at 10:19, Derek Higgins > > wrote: >> >> Hi All, >> >> A few months tripleo switch from its

Re: [openstack-dev] [QA][Tempest] Use tempest-config for tempest-cli-improvements

2015-11-30 Thread David_Paterson
Dell - Internal Use - Confidential I don’t really understand the friction, it’s incredibly useful, especially for new users. Use it or don’t use it it’s up to you, nowhere is it implied that the user is forced to configure tempest with the tool. Without a tool like this it is complex for new

[openstack-dev] [Neutron] Evolving the stadium concept

2015-11-30 Thread Armando M.
Hi folks, The stadium concept was introduced more or less formally since April of this year. At the time it was introduced (see [1]), the list of deliverables included neutron, client, specs and *-aas services. As you may be well aware, 6+ months is a long time in the OpenStack world, and lots of

[openstack-dev] [nova][glance][cinder][neutron]How to make use of x-openstack-request-id

2015-11-30 Thread Tan, Lin
Hi guys I recently play around with 'x-openstack-request-id' header but have a dump question about how it works. At beginning, I thought an action across different services should use a same request-id but it looks like this is not the true. First I read the spec:

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][all] The lock files saga (and where we can go from here)

2015-11-30 Thread Clint Byrum
Excerpts from Ben Nemec's message of 2015-11-30 13:22:23 -0800: > On 11/30/2015 02:15 PM, Sean Dague wrote: > > On 11/30/2015 03:01 PM, Robert Collins wrote: > >> On 1 December 2015 at 08:37, Ben Nemec wrote: > >>> On 11/30/2015 12:42 PM, Joshua Harlow wrote: > Hi

Re: [openstack-dev] Role in Congress

2015-11-30 Thread Adam Young
On 11/28/2015 05:03 AM, zhangyali (D) wrote: Hi Tim and All, I remember there is a topic named “role assignment for service users” in the Tokyo Summit. Since I have not heard any message of this topic. Does anyone could contribute some information for me? I think it is vital for my design

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder]Do we have project scope for cinder?

2015-11-30 Thread hao wang
Thanks very much, Anita, very usefully information, I will check it. 2015-11-30 23:36 GMT+08:00 Anita Kuno : > On 11/29/2015 02:02 PM, Sean McGinnis wrote: >> On Sun, Nov 29, 2015 at 11:44:19AM +, Dulko, Michal wrote: >>> On Sat, 2015-11-28 at 10:56 +0800, hao wang

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder]Do we have project scope for cinder?

2015-11-30 Thread hao wang
Thanks Xing Yang, I have noticed this spec, it's glad to see you to start this work. 2015-11-30 23:10 GMT+08:00 yang, xing : > Hi Wang Hao, > > Here¹s a Cinder spec in review on replicating a group of volumes: > > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/229722/ > > It is a not an easy

[openstack-dev] CentOS7 Merging Plan

2015-11-30 Thread Dmitry Teselkin
Hello, We're almost got green BVT on custom CentOS7 ISO and it seems that it's the time to discuss the plan how this feature could be merged. This is not the only one feature that is in a queue. Unfortunately, almost any other feature will be broken if merged after CentOS7, so it was decided to

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo][ironic][heat] Adding back the tripleo check job

2015-11-30 Thread Zane Bitter
On 30/11/15 12:51, Ruby Loo wrote: On 30 November 2015 at 10:19, Derek Higgins > wrote: Hi All, A few months tripleo switch from its devtest based CI to one that was based on instack. Before doing this we anticipated

[openstack-dev] [ironic] Third Party CI Deadlines for Mitaka and N

2015-11-30 Thread Mike Perez
On October 28th 2015 at the Ironic Third Party CI summit session [1], there was consensus by the Ironic core and participating vendors that the set of deadlines will be: * Mitaka-2ː Driver teams will have registered their intent to run CI by creating system accounts and identifying a point of

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Evolving the stadium concept

2015-11-30 Thread Doug Wiegley
> On Nov 30, 2015, at 5:56 PM, Armando M. wrote: > > Hi folks, > > The stadium concept was introduced more or less formally since April of this > year. At the time it was introduced (see [1]), the list of deliverables > included neutron, client, specs and *-aas services.

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Evolving the stadium concept

2015-11-30 Thread Armando M.
On 30 November 2015 at 20:47, Doug Wiegley wrote: > > On Nov 30, 2015, at 5:56 PM, Armando M. wrote: > > Hi folks, > > The stadium concept was introduced more or less formally since April of > this year. At the time it was introduced (see [1]),

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][glance] Add Sabari Kumar Murugesan <smuruge...@vmware.com>

2015-11-30 Thread Nikhil Komawar
HI, Great to see him (Sabari) finally being proposed after new cycle settling wait. I agree he has always done good work and shows great awareness and expertise on the store (data transfer) fronts. Definitely going to be a great core. (For context) Like my previous shout out [1] to (Sabari &)

[openstack-dev] [keystone]Different projects authentication strategy

2015-11-30 Thread 1021710773
Every Developers, Hello. I here would like to ask some questions about policy rules. Now the policy rules of openstack in keystone and other projects are set in policy.json, in other words, the policy rules are equal to each projects. And the common ways to enforce are in decorative

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-infra] Project approved specs

2015-11-30 Thread Steve Martinelli
you probably want to propose a change to this file: https://github.com/openstack-infra/project-config/blob/master/specs/specs.yaml Thanks, Steve Martinelli OpenStack Keystone Project Team Lead From: "GROSZ, Maty (Maty)" To: "OpenStack Development Mailing

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Evolving the stadium concept

2015-11-30 Thread Brandon Logan
On Mon, 2015-11-30 at 23:11 -0500, Russell Bryant wrote: > Some additional context: there are a few proposals for additional git > repositories for Neutron that have been put on hold while we sort this out. > > Add networking-bagpipe: > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/244736/ > > Add the

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][glance] Add Sabari Kumar Murugesan <smuruge...@vmware.com>

2015-11-30 Thread Bhandaru, Malini K
+1 on Sabari! :-) -Original Message- From: Flavio Percoco [mailto:fla...@redhat.com] Sent: Monday, November 23, 2015 12:21 PM To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Cc: Sabari Kumar Murugesan Subject: [openstack-dev] [all][glance] Add Sabari Kumar Murugesan

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Evolving the stadium concept

2015-11-30 Thread Doug Wiegley
> On Nov 30, 2015, at 9:11 PM, Russell Bryant wrote: > > Some additional context: there are a few proposals for additional git > repositories for Neutron that have been put on hold while we sort this out. > > Add networking-bagpipe: >

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Evolving the stadium concept

2015-11-30 Thread Doug Wiegley
> On Nov 30, 2015, at 10:15 PM, Armando M. wrote: > > > > On 30 November 2015 at 20:47, Doug Wiegley > wrote: > >> On Nov 30, 2015, at 5:56 PM, Armando M. >

  1   2   >