Re: [openstack-dev] [stable] meeting time proposal

2015-12-16 Thread Matthew Treinish
On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 01:12:13PM -0600, Matt Riedemann wrote: > I'm not entirely sure what the geo distribution is for everyone that works > on stable, but I know we have people in Europe and some people in Australia. > So I was thinking alternating weekly meetings: > > Mondays at 2100 UTC > >

[openstack-dev] Naming Polls for N and O are open

2015-12-16 Thread Monty Taylor
Hey everybody! The naming polls for N and O have started. You should have received an email for each of them. They'll be open until the end of Dec 22 UTC. Once there are presumptive winners in each, please remember that we will then have the names vetted by the OpenStack Foundation's lawyers,

[openstack-dev] [ceilometer][gnocchi] 'bad' resource_id

2015-12-16 Thread Lu, Lianhao
Hi stackers, In ceilometer, some metrics(e.g. network.incoming.bytes for VM net interface, hardware.network.incoming.bytes for host net interface, compute.node.cpu.percentage for nova compute node host cpu utilization, etc.) don't have their resource_id in UUID format(which is required by

Re: [openstack-dev] [ceilometer][gnocchi] 'bad' resource_id

2015-12-16 Thread Chris Dent
On Wed, 16 Dec 2015, Lu, Lianhao wrote: In ceilometer, some metrics(e.g. network.incoming.bytes for VM net interface, hardware.network.incoming.bytes for host net interface, compute.node.cpu.percentage for nova compute node host cpu utilization, etc.) don't have their resource_id in UUID

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack][magnum] Quota for Magnum Resources

2015-12-16 Thread Vilobh Meshram
The intent here in Magnum is to enforce quota on resources owned by Magnum (#of bays etc that are allowed to be created for a user in a project). +1 to Lee that "Resources created by Magnum COEs should be governed by existing quota policies governing said resources (e.g. Nova and vCPUs).".

[openstack-dev] [Manila] Generic share groups

2015-12-16 Thread Knight, Clinton
Hello, Manila-philes. In last week's Manila IRC meeting, I briefly outlined a proposal for a generic share grouping facility in Manila. It is on the agenda for tomorrow (17 Dec), and I've described the ideas more fully on the Manila wiki. We think this would benefit every driver, improve the

Re: [openstack-dev] [midonet] ping cannot work from VM to external gateway IP.

2015-12-16 Thread Duarte Nunes
On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 12:20 PM Li Ma wrote: > Updated: > > Lots of ARP requests from external physical router to VM are catched > on the physical NIC binded to provider router port. > > It seems that external physical router doesn't get answers to these > ARP

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack][magnum] Quota for Magnum Resources

2015-12-16 Thread Lee Calcote
Food for thought - there is a cost to FIPs (in the case of public IP addresses), security groups (to a lesser extent, but in terms of the computation of many hundreds of them), etc. Administrators may wish to enforce quotas on a variety of resources that are direct costs or indirect costs (e.g.

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic] [Nova] continuing the "multiple compute host" discussion

2015-12-16 Thread James Penick
>Affinity is mostly meaningless with baremetal. It's entirely a >virtualization related thing. If you try and group things by TOR, or >chassis, or anything else, it's going to start meaning something entirely >different than it means in Nova, I disagree, in fact, we need TOR and power

Re: [openstack-dev] [gate] any project using olso.db test_migrations is currently blocked

2015-12-16 Thread Carl Baldwin
On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 11:32 AM, Jeremy Stanley wrote: [...] > Yes, it's progressing nicely. DevStack-based jobs are already > covered this way for master and stable/liberty, and Neutron is > piloting the same solution for its other non-DevStack-based jobs. If Is someone from

Re: [openstack-dev] [gate] any project using olso.db test_migrations is currently blocked

2015-12-16 Thread Dan Smith
> It was in the queue for 11 days, Dan Smith took a look, he added Jay > Pipes, and I also added Matt Riedemann, there were also a bunch of > neutron folks on it since this fix originated from their end. Yeah, and both of those other people have had serious other commitments in the last two

Re: [openstack-dev] [gate] any project using olso.db test_migrations is currently blocked

2015-12-16 Thread Flavio Percoco
On 16/12/15 11:53 -0500, Sean Dague wrote: On 12/16/2015 11:37 AM, Sean Dague wrote: On 12/16/2015 11:22 AM, Mike Bayer wrote: On 12/16/2015 09:10 AM, Sylvain Bauza wrote: Le 16/12/2015 14:59, Sean Dague a écrit : oslo.db test_migrations is using methods for alembic, which changed in the

Re: [openstack-dev] [gate] any project using olso.db test_migrations is currently blocked

2015-12-16 Thread Julien Danjou
On Wed, Dec 16 2015, Carl Baldwin wrote: > We need to vet new package releases before they wreak havoc. We need > to accept new package releases by proposing a patch to update the > version and take it through the gate. Weren't we working on this at > one point? I understand if it isn't quite

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][QA] New testing guidelines

2015-12-16 Thread Boris Pavlovic
Assaf, We can as well add Rally testing for scale/performance/regression testing. Best regards, Boris Pavlovic On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 7:00 AM, Fawad Khaliq wrote: > Very useful information. Thanks, Assaf. > > Fawad Khaliq > > > On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 6:26 AM, Assaf

Re: [openstack-dev] [puppet] adding puppet-rally to OpenStack

2015-12-16 Thread Cody Herriges
Emilien Macchi wrote: > I just noticed we have a second module written by Cody: > https://github.com/ody/puppet-rally > > We might want to collaborate on that. > Yeah...I'd actually completely forgotten that existed until Emilien mentioned it to me in IRC. It was my responsibility to deploy

[openstack-dev] [app-catalog] IRC Meeting Thursday December 17th at 17:00UTC

2015-12-16 Thread Christopher Aedo
Greetings! Our next OpenStack Community App Catalog meeting will take place this ThursdayDecember 17th at 17:00 UTC in #openstack-meeting-3 The agenda can be found here: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/app-catalog Please add agenda items if there's anything specific you would like to

[openstack-dev] [Performance][Holidays] IRC meeting schedule

2015-12-16 Thread Dina Belova
Folks, we had an IRC meeting yesterday, and holidays schedule was one of the topics covered. Although, the final decision was not made, so let's finalise everything here :) There are few options for 2015 and 2016 now: 1) Let's *do not have more meetings this year or let's meet last time on Dec

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack][magnum] Quota for Magnum Resources

2015-12-16 Thread Adrian Otto
Clint, > On Dec 16, 2015, at 11:56 AM, Tim Bell wrote: > >> -Original Message- >> From: Clint Byrum [mailto:cl...@fewbar.com] >> Sent: 15 December 2015 22:40 >> To: openstack-dev >> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack][magnum]

[openstack-dev] [Tacker] No IRC weekly meetings next two weeks

2015-12-16 Thread Sridhar Ramaswamy
We are skipping the next two weekly meetings, - Dec 22 - Dec 29 We will reconvene Jan 5th at our usual 1700 UTC slot. BTW, though we skipping these meetings, tacker core team is available to continue to review and merge patchsets over next two weeks, so keep them coming! - Sridhar

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][QA] New testing guidelines

2015-12-16 Thread Assaf Muller
On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 2:32 PM, Boris Pavlovic wrote: > Assaf, > > We can as well add Rally testing for scale/performance/regression testing. There's mention of it in the doc but not the rationale of using it like for the other testing frameworks. I'd appreciate it if a Rally

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack][magnum] Quota for Magnum Resources

2015-12-16 Thread Fox, Kevin M
keypairs are real though. they consume database resource at the moment. You don't want a user blowing out your db. Quota's should be for things that ops will get sad over, if the users consume too many of them. Thanks, Kevin From: Tim Bell

Re: [openstack-dev] [stable] meeting time proposal

2015-12-16 Thread Mark McClain
> On Dec 16, 2015, at 2:12 PM, Matt Riedemann > wrote: > > I'm not entirely sure what the geo distribution is for everyone that works on > stable, but I know we have people in Europe and some people in Australia. So > I was thinking alternating weekly meetings: >

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][keystone] Move oslo.policy from oslo to keystone

2015-12-16 Thread Dolph Mathews
On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 1:33 PM, Davanum Srinivas wrote: > Brant, > > I am ok either way, guess the alternative was to add keystone-core > directly to the oslo.policy core group (can't check right now). > That's certainly reasonable, and kind of what we did with pycadf. > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic] [Nova] continuing the "multiple compute host" discussion

2015-12-16 Thread James Penick
Someone else expressed this more gracefully than I: *'Because sans Ironic, compute-nodes still have physical characteristics* *that make grouping on them attractive for things like anti-affinity. I* *don't really want my HA instances "not on the same compute node", I want* *them "not in the same

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack][magnum] Quota for Magnum Resources

2015-12-16 Thread Clint Byrum
Excerpts from Fox, Kevin M's message of 2015-12-16 12:19:59 -0800: > keypairs are real though. they consume database resource at the moment. You > don't want a user blowing out your db. Quota's should be for things that ops > will get sad over, if the users consume too many of them. > Limit

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][keystone] Move oslo.policy from oslo to keystone

2015-12-16 Thread Davanum Srinivas
Brant, I am ok either way, guess the alternative was to add keystone-core directly to the oslo.policy core group (can't check right now). The name is very possibly going to create confusion -- Dims On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 7:22 PM, Jordan Pittier wrote: > Hi, > I am

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack][magnum] Quota for Magnum Resources

2015-12-16 Thread Tim Bell
> -Original Message- > From: Clint Byrum [mailto:cl...@fewbar.com] > Sent: 15 December 2015 22:40 > To: openstack-dev > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack][magnum] Quota for Magnum > Resources > > Hi! Can I offer a counter point? > > Quotas are

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic][neutron][keystone] how to reauth the token

2015-12-16 Thread Dolph Mathews
On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 9:59 AM, Pavlo Shchelokovskyy < pshchelokovs...@mirantis.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > I'd like to start discussion on how Ironic is using Neutron when Keystone > is involved. > > Recently the patch [0] was merged in Ironic to fix a bug when the token > with which to create

[openstack-dev] [mistral] "Mistral HA and multi-regional support" meeting minutes

2015-12-16 Thread ELISHA, Moshe (Moshe)
Hi all, Renat and I had an action item to think about "Mistral HA and multi-regional support". No big surprises. These are the meeting minutes: Mistral Multi-Region: * A blueprint already exists [1] * Most topics were already discussed in Mitaka OpenStack summit and are described in the

Re: [openstack-dev] [gate] any project using olso.db test_migrations is currently blocked

2015-12-16 Thread Kevin Benton
Yeah. The twisted take-away from this thread is to not test your changes against openstack so you have plausible deniability. :) On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 9:04 AM, Mike Bayer wrote: > > > On 12/16/2015 11:53 AM, Sean Dague wrote: > > On 12/16/2015 11:37 AM, Sean Dague wrote: >

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Proposal to Delay Docker Removal From Fuel Master Node

2015-12-16 Thread Vladimir Kuklin
Vladimir I am pretty much for removing docker, but I do not think that we should startle our developers/QA folks with additional efforts on fixing 2 different environments. Let's just think from the point of development velocity here and at delay such changes for at least after NY. Because if we

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Proposal to Delay Docker Removal From Fuel Master Node

2015-12-16 Thread Vladimir Kozhukalov
Vladimir, I have other activities planned for the time immediately after SCF (separating UI from fuel-web, maybe it is even more invasive :-)) and it is not a big deal to postpone this feature or another. I am against the approach itself of postponing something because it is too invasive. If we

Re: [openstack-dev] [gate] any project using olso.db test_migrations is currently blocked

2015-12-16 Thread Mike Bayer
On 12/16/2015 11:37 AM, Sean Dague wrote: > On 12/16/2015 11:22 AM, Mike Bayer wrote: >> >> >> On 12/16/2015 09:10 AM, Sylvain Bauza wrote: >>> >>> >>> Le 16/12/2015 14:59, Sean Dague a écrit : oslo.db test_migrations is using methods for alembic, which changed in the 0.8.4 release.

Re: [openstack-dev] [gate] any project using olso.db test_migrations is currently blocked

2015-12-16 Thread Carl Baldwin
On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 10:04 AM, Mike Bayer wrote: >> Instead of just breaking the world, and burning 10s to 100 engineer >> hours in redo tests and investigating and addressing the break after the >> fact. We shouldn't let this happen in the first place. I think this is our

Re: [openstack-dev] [midonet] ping cannot work from VM to external gateway IP.

2015-12-16 Thread Ivan Kelly
>>> I cannot ping from VM to external gateway IP (which is set up at the >>> physical router side). This is a known issue. We have it in the backlog to fix but noone has gotten to it yet. -Ivan __ OpenStack Development

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic][neutron][keystone] how to reauth the token

2015-12-16 Thread Clint Byrum
Excerpts from Pavlo Shchelokovskyy's message of 2015-12-16 07:59:42 -0800: > Hi all, > > I'd like to start discussion on how Ironic is using Neutron when Keystone > is involved. > > Recently the patch [0] was merged in Ironic to fix a bug when the token > with which to create the neutronclient

[openstack-dev] [cloudkitty] Feature freeze for release 0.5

2015-12-16 Thread Stéphane Albert
Hi, As you might already know we are using the independent release which means that we can release whenever we want. Like we discussed during the Tokyo summit our goal is to release a couple versions before the Mitaka release which should correspond to the 1.0 version. Every version will

[openstack-dev] [kolla] Upgrading containers in Mesos/Marathon environment - request for feedback

2015-12-16 Thread Marek Zawadzki
Hello all, I described use case and simple tool that I'd like to implement as a first step in this topic - would you please review it and provide me with feedback before I start coding? Is the use-case realistic? Is this tool going to be useful given the features I described? Any other

[openstack-dev] [tripleo] Operational tools support

2015-12-16 Thread Emilien Macchi
Hi TripleO, I recently sent an email about my progress on adding monitoring in TripleO. I've made more progress this week on logging and I would like to present you the work. If you're interested, please look this 12 min presentation: https://youtu.be/SJWA_vwc4wI Summary: * About operational

Re: [openstack-dev] [puppet] adding puppet-rally to OpenStack

2015-12-16 Thread Emilien Macchi
I just noticed we have a second module written by Cody: https://github.com/ody/puppet-rally We might want to collaborate on that. On 12/16/2015 02:03 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote: > [adding openstack-dev mailing list for public discussion] > > Hi Andy, > > I was wondering if you would be

Re: [openstack-dev] [gate] any project using olso.db test_migrations is currently blocked

2015-12-16 Thread Mike Bayer
On 12/16/2015 11:53 AM, Sean Dague wrote: > On 12/16/2015 11:37 AM, Sean Dague wrote: >> On 12/16/2015 11:22 AM, Mike Bayer wrote: >>> >>> >>> On 12/16/2015 09:10 AM, Sylvain Bauza wrote: Le 16/12/2015 14:59, Sean Dague a écrit : > oslo.db test_migrations is using methods for

Re: [openstack-dev] [gate] any project using olso.db test_migrations is currently blocked

2015-12-16 Thread Joshua Harlow
Carl Baldwin wrote: On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 10:04 AM, Mike Bayer wrote: Instead of just breaking the world, and burning 10s to 100 engineer hours in redo tests and investigating and addressing the break after the fact. We shouldn't let this happen in the first place. I

Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Removing pod, rcs and service APIs

2015-12-16 Thread Cammann, Tom
I don’t see a benefit from supporting the old API through a microversion when the same functionality will be available through the native API. We are still early enough in Magnum to make significant API changes, no one is using Magnum as a whole in production. Have we had any discussion on

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic] [Nova] continuing the "multiple compute host" discussion

2015-12-16 Thread Clint Byrum
Excerpts from Jim Rollenhagen's message of 2015-12-16 08:03:22 -0800: > Nobody is talking about running a compute per flavor or capability. All > compute hosts will be able to handle all ironic nodes. We *do* still > need to figure out how to handle availability zones or host aggregates, > but I

Re: [openstack-dev] [gate] any project using olso.db test_migrations is currently blocked

2015-12-16 Thread Davanum Srinivas
Mike, I for one whole heartedly thank you for everything you do including extra nova review in this case. -- dims > On Dec 16, 2015, at 12:04 PM, Mike Bayer wrote: > > > >> On 12/16/2015 11:53 AM, Sean Dague wrote: >>> On 12/16/2015 11:37 AM, Sean Dague wrote: On

Re: [openstack-dev] [gate] any project using olso.db test_migrations is currently blocked

2015-12-16 Thread Sean Dague
On 12/16/2015 11:37 AM, Sean Dague wrote: > On 12/16/2015 11:22 AM, Mike Bayer wrote: >> >> >> On 12/16/2015 09:10 AM, Sylvain Bauza wrote: >>> >>> >>> Le 16/12/2015 14:59, Sean Dague a écrit : oslo.db test_migrations is using methods for alembic, which changed in the 0.8.4 release. This

[openstack-dev] [keystone] Will domain be removed in Keystone Mitaka?

2015-12-16 Thread Dolph Mathews
On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 10:08 PM, darren wang wrote: > Hi Dolph, > > > > We are doing something on “domain” now, but I saw bp-reseller which will > integrate domain with project and remove domain finally, I’m pretty > concerned that will domain be removed in Mitaka? >

[openstack-dev] [oslo][keystone] Move oslo.policy from oslo to keystone

2015-12-16 Thread Brant Knudson
I'd like to propose moving oslo.policy from the oslo program to the keystone program. Keystone developers know what's going on with oslo.policy and I think are more interested in what's going on with it so that reviews will get proper vetting, and it's not like oslo doesn't have enough going on

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][keystone] Move oslo.policy from oslo to keystone

2015-12-16 Thread Jordan Pittier
Hi, I am sure oslo.policy would be good under Keystone's governance. But I am not sure I understood what's wrong in having oslo.policy under the oslo program ? Jordan On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 6:13 PM, Brant Knudson wrote: > > I'd like to propose moving oslo.policy from the oslo

Re: [openstack-dev] [gate] any project using olso.db test_migrations is currently blocked

2015-12-16 Thread Jeremy Stanley
On 2015-12-16 11:03:38 -0700 (-0700), Carl Baldwin wrote: [...] > We need to vet new package releases before they wreak havoc. We need > to accept new package releases by proposing a patch to update the > version and take it through the gate. Weren't we working on this at > one point? I

Re: [openstack-dev] [midonet] ping cannot work from VM to external gateway IP.

2015-12-16 Thread Richard Raseley
Are the gateway nodes virtualized? If so, are you allowing promiscuous mode / MAC spoofing? > On Dec 16, 2015, at 4:19 AM, Li Ma wrote: > > Updated: > > Lots of ARP requests from external physical router to VM are catched > on the physical NIC binded to provider

[openstack-dev] [stable] meeting time proposal

2015-12-16 Thread Matt Riedemann
I'm not entirely sure what the geo distribution is for everyone that works on stable, but I know we have people in Europe and some people in Australia. So I was thinking alternating weekly meetings: Mondays at 2100 UTC Tuesdays at 1500 UTC Does that at least sort of work for people that

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Testing concerns around boot from UEFI spec

2015-12-16 Thread James Bottomley
On Fri, 2015-12-04 at 08:46 -0500, Sean Dague wrote: > On 12/04/2015 08:34 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 04, 2015 at 07:43:41AM -0500, Sean Dague wrote: > > > That seems weird enough that I'd rather push back on our Platinum > > > Board > > > member to fix the licensing before we

[openstack-dev] [openstack][openstack-operators][chef] kitchen-openstack 2.2.0 released!

2015-12-16 Thread JJ Asghar
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hey everyone! I just released 2.2.0[1] of the kitchen-openstack driver. If your curious the CHANGELOG is located here[2]. We're doing great work with kitchen-openstack, and would love to see some more feedback on things the community would support

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Proposal to Delay Docker Removal From Fuel Master Node

2015-12-16 Thread Oleg Gelbukh
Hi Although I agree that it should be done, the removal of Docker doesn't seem an urgent feature to me. It is not blocking anything besides moving to full package-based deployment of Fuel, as far as I understand. So it could be easily delayed for one milestone, especially if it is already almost

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][keystone] Move oslo.policy from oslo to keystone

2015-12-16 Thread Brant Knudson
On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 11:13 AM, Brant Knudson wrote: > > I'd like to propose moving oslo.policy from the oslo program to the > keystone program. Keystone developers know what's going on with oslo.policy > and I think are more interested in what's going on with it so that reviews

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel][Ubuntu bootstrap] WebUI notification

2015-12-16 Thread Aleksey Zvyagintsev
> > > What if user choose CentOS bootstrap? We ship it on ISO, so why do > > we need to show error message? > > CentOS bootstrap still is not activated > Its pretty simple case-flow: If selected ubuntu: - Try build -- Notify if build and activate fail -- Notify if build and activate ok If

[openstack-dev] [puppet] adding puppet-rally to OpenStack

2015-12-16 Thread Emilien Macchi
[adding openstack-dev mailing list for public discussion] Hi Andy, I was wondering if you would be interested to move puppet-rally [1] to OpenStack? We have some documentation about the process [2] but feel free to ping us on IRC #puppet-openstack or by this thread if you're interested to

Re: [openstack-dev] [ceilometer][gnocchi] 'bad' resource_id

2015-12-16 Thread Lu, Lianhao
On Dec 16, 2015 14:13, Chris Dent wrote: > On Wed, 16 Dec 2015, Lu, Lianhao wrote: > >> In ceilometer, some metrics(e.g. network.incoming.bytes for VM net >> interface, hardware.network.incoming.bytes for host net interface, >> compute.node.cpu.percentage for nova compute node host cpu >>

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic] [Nova] continuing the "multiple compute host" discussion

2015-12-16 Thread James Penick
>We actually called out this problem in the Ironic midcycle and the Tokyo >summit - we decided to report Ironic's total capacity from each compute >host (resulting in over-reporting from Nova), and real capacity (for >purposes of reporting, monitoring, whatever) should be fetched by >operators

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][cinder] what are the key errors with volume detach

2015-12-16 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 12/14/2015 11:24 AM, Andrea Rosa wrote: On 10/12/15 15:29, Matt Riedemann wrote: In a simplified view of a detach volume we can say that the nova code does: 1 detach the volume from the instance 2 Inform cinder about the detach and call the terminate_connection on the cinder API. 3

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack][magnum] Quota for Magnum Resources

2015-12-16 Thread James Bottomley
On Wed, 2015-12-16 at 22:48 +, Adrian Otto wrote: > On Dec 16, 2015, at 2:25 PM, James Bottomley < > james.bottom...@hansenpartnership.com james.bottom...@hansenpartnership.com>> wrote: > > On Wed, 2015-12-16 at 20:35 +, Adrian Otto wrote: > Clint, > > On Dec 16, 2015, at 11:56 AM, Tim

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic] [Nova] continuing the "multiple compute host" discussion

2015-12-16 Thread Andrew Laski
On 12/16/15 at 12:40pm, James Penick wrote: Affinity is mostly meaningless with baremetal. It's entirely a virtualization related thing. If you try and group things by TOR, or chassis, or anything else, it's going to start meaning something entirely different than it means in Nova, I disagree,

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra] openstack/requirements repo has a stable/icehouse branch...

2015-12-16 Thread Davanum Srinivas
Jeremy, Thanks. +1 from me. -- dims On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 11:41 PM, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > On 2015-12-16 15:35:23 -0600 (-0600), Matt Riedemann wrote: >> That should be deleted, right? Or are there random projects that still have >> stable/icehouse branches in

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack][magnum] Quota for Magnum Resources

2015-12-16 Thread Clint Byrum
Excerpts from Adrian Otto's message of 2015-12-16 12:35:10 -0800: > Clint, > > > On Dec 16, 2015, at 11:56 AM, Tim Bell wrote: > > > >> -Original Message- > >> From: Clint Byrum [mailto:cl...@fewbar.com] > >> Sent: 15 December 2015 22:40 > >> To: openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra] Gerrit Upgrade to ver 2.11 completed.

2015-12-16 Thread Michał Dulko
On 12/16/2015 10:22 PM, Zaro wrote: > Thanks to everyone for their patience while we upgraded to Gerrit > 2.11. I'm happy to announce that we were able to successfully > completed this task at around 21:00 UTC. You may hack away once more. > > If you encounter any problems, please let us know

[openstack-dev] [infra] openstack/requirements repo has a stable/icehouse branch...

2015-12-16 Thread Matt Riedemann
That should be deleted, right? Or are there random projects that still have stable/icehouse branches in projects.txt and we care about them? -- Thanks, Matt Riedemann __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra] openstack/requirements repo has a stable/icehouse branch...

2015-12-16 Thread Jeremy Stanley
On 2015-12-16 15:35:23 -0600 (-0600), Matt Riedemann wrote: > That should be deleted, right? Or are there random projects that still have > stable/icehouse branches in projects.txt and we care about them? I believe I simply missed it during the stable/icehouse batch EOL. That was the timeframe

[openstack-dev] [Neutron][DVR] - No IRC Meeting for the next two weeks.

2015-12-16 Thread Vasudevan, Swaminathan (PNB Roseville)
Hi Folks, We will not be having our DVR sub-team meeting for the next two weeks. Dec 23rd 2015 Dec 30th 2015. We will resume our meeting on "Jan 6th 2016". If you have any questions please ping us in IRC or send an email to the distribution list.

Re: [openstack-dev] [gate] any project using olso.db test_migrations is currently blocked

2015-12-16 Thread Jeremy Stanley
On 2015-12-16 16:50:39 -0500 (-0500), Mike Bayer wrote: [...] > That said, as the upper-constraints system is available, and not using > it means that any upstream package release that breaks any test will > cause 12 hours of gate downtime, I'm surprised that rolling this system > out across the

Re: [openstack-dev] [stable] meeting time proposal

2015-12-16 Thread Tony Breeds
On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 01:12:13PM -0600, Matt Riedemann wrote: > I'm not entirely sure what the geo distribution is for everyone that works > on stable, but I know we have people in Europe and some people in Australia. > So I was thinking alternating weekly meetings: > > Mondays at 2100 UTC > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic] [Nova] continuing the "multiple compute host" discussion

2015-12-16 Thread melanie witt
On Dec 10, 2015, at 15:57, Devananda van der Veen wrote: > So, at this point, I think we need to accept that the scheduling of > virtualized and bare metal workloads are two different problem domains that > are equally complex. > > Either, we: > * build a separate

Re: [openstack-dev] [gate] any project using olso.db test_migrations is currently blocked

2015-12-16 Thread Jeremy Stanley
On 2015-12-16 13:59:55 -0700 (-0700), Carl Baldwin wrote: > Is someone from Neutron actively helping out here? Need more? [...] I believe all of the jobs currently voting on changes proposed to the master branch of the openstack/neutron repo are using centrally constrained requirements (they all

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic] [Nova] continuing the "multiple compute host" discussion

2015-12-16 Thread Jim Rollenhagen
On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 01:51:47PM -0800, James Penick wrote: > >We actually called out this problem in the Ironic midcycle and the Tokyo > >summit - we decided to report Ironic's total capacity from each compute > >host (resulting in over-reporting from Nova), and real capacity (for > >purposes

Re: [openstack-dev] [ceilometer][gnocchi] 'bad' resource_id

2015-12-16 Thread gord chung
On 16/12/2015 4:24 PM, Lu, Lianhao wrote: On Dec 16, 2015 14:13, Chris Dent wrote: On Wed, 16 Dec 2015, Lu, Lianhao wrote: In ceilometer, some metrics(e.g. network.incoming.bytes for VM net interface, hardware.network.incoming.bytes for host net interface, compute.node.cpu.percentage for

[openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra] Gerrit Upgrade to ver 2.11 completed.

2015-12-16 Thread Zaro
On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 6:38 PM, Spencer Krum wrote: > Hi All, > > The infra team will be taking gerrit offline for an upgrade on December > 16th. We > will start the operation at 17:00 UTC and will continue until about > 21:00 UTC. > > This outage is to upgrade Gerrit to

Re: [openstack-dev] [stable] meeting time proposal

2015-12-16 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 12/16/2015 2:45 PM, Mark McClain wrote: On Dec 16, 2015, at 2:12 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: I'm not entirely sure what the geo distribution is for everyone that works on stable, but I know we have people in Europe and some people in Australia. So I was

Re: [openstack-dev] [gate] any project using olso.db test_migrations is currently blocked

2015-12-16 Thread Mike Bayer
On 12/16/2015 01:32 PM, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > On 2015-12-16 11:03:38 -0700 (-0700), Carl Baldwin wrote: > [...] >> We need to vet new package releases before they wreak havoc. We need >> to accept new package releases by proposing a patch to update the >> version and take it through the gate.

Re: [openstack-dev] [searchlight] Weekly IRC meeting cancelled December 17th & 24th

2015-12-16 Thread Tripp, Travis S
After some more conversation, it sounds like New Years eve also is a bad day for most people. Are next meeting will be Thursday, December 7th. On 12/15/15, 5:42 PM, "Tripp, Travis S" wrote: >We will not be holding our weekly IRC meeting this week due to the >busy

[openstack-dev] [horizon] Weekly IRC meetings cancelled Dec 23rd and 30th

2015-12-16 Thread David Lyle
There will be no Horizon and HorizonDrivers meetings on Dec 23rd and Dec 30th. We will resume on Jan 6th. Thanks, David __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe:

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra] Gerrit Upgrade to ver 2.11 completed.

2015-12-16 Thread Zaro
We have identified this and will look into it soon. Thanks for reporting the issue. On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 2:02 PM, Michał Dulko wrote: > On 12/16/2015 10:22 PM, Zaro wrote: >> Thanks to everyone for their patience while we upgraded to Gerrit >> 2.11. I'm happy to

Re: [openstack-dev] [stable] meeting time proposal

2015-12-16 Thread Ian Cordasco
On 12/16/15, 16:41, "Tony Breeds" wrote: >On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 01:12:13PM -0600, Matt Riedemann wrote: >> I'm not entirely sure what the geo distribution is for everyone that >>works >> on stable, but I know we have people in Europe and some people in >>Australia.

Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Removing pod, rcs and service APIs

2015-12-16 Thread Adrian Otto
Tom, > On Dec 16, 2015, at 9:31 AM, Cammann, Tom wrote: > > I don’t see a benefit from supporting the old API through a microversion > when the same functionality will be available through the native API. +1 [snip] > Have we had any discussion on adding a v2 API and

Re: [openstack-dev] [gate] any project using olso.db test_migrations is currently blocked

2015-12-16 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 12/16/2015 10:22 AM, Mike Bayer wrote: On 12/16/2015 09:10 AM, Sylvain Bauza wrote: Le 16/12/2015 14:59, Sean Dague a écrit : oslo.db test_migrations is using methods for alembic, which changed in the 0.8.4 release. This ends up causing a unit test failure (at least in the Nova case)

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic] [Nova] continuing the "multiple compute host" discussion

2015-12-16 Thread Chris Dent
On Wed, 16 Dec 2015, melanie witt wrote: I’d rather we provided something like a more generic “Resource View API” in Nova that allows baremetal/container/clustered hypervisor environments to report resources via a REST API, and scheduling would occur based on the resources table (instead of

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack][magnum] Quota for Magnum Resources

2015-12-16 Thread James Bottomley
On Wed, 2015-12-16 at 20:35 +, Adrian Otto wrote: > Clint, > > > On Dec 16, 2015, at 11:56 AM, Tim Bell wrote: > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Clint Byrum [mailto:cl...@fewbar.com] > > > Sent: 15 December 2015 22:40 > > > To: openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack][magnum] Quota for Magnum Resources

2015-12-16 Thread Adrian Otto
On Dec 16, 2015, at 2:25 PM, James Bottomley > wrote: On Wed, 2015-12-16 at 20:35 +, Adrian Otto wrote: Clint, On Dec 16, 2015, at 11:56 AM, Tim Bell > wrote:

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][taas] neutron ovs-agent deletes taas flows

2015-12-16 Thread Soichi Shigeta
Thank you for your helpful comments. I'd like to update my proposal as follows: 1. Set an integer cookie value to taas flows. Maybe all "1" for short term tentative value. 2. Modify the cleanup logic in ovs-agent not to delete flows which have a reserved integer cookie value.

Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Removing pod, rcs and service APIs

2015-12-16 Thread Kai Qiang Wu
Hi Adrian, Right now, I think: for the unify-COE-container actions bp, it needs more discussion and good design to make it happen. ( I think spec is needed for this) And for the k8s related objects deprecation, it needs backup instead of directly dropped it. Especially when we not have any

Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Magnum conductor async container operations

2015-12-16 Thread SURO
Please find the reply inline. Regards, SURO irc//freenode: suro-patz On 12/16/15 7:19 PM, Adrian Otto wrote: On Dec 16, 2015, at 6:24 PM, Joshua Harlow wrote: SURO wrote: Hi all, Please review and provide feedback on the following design proposal for implementing the

Re: [openstack-dev] [midonet] how to configure static route for uplink

2015-12-16 Thread Jan Hilberath
On 12/17/2015 12:57 AM, Li Ma wrote: > Hi, I'm following [1] to configure static route for uplink. I'm not > sure whether I'm getting it. > > (1) Floating-IP subnet (gateway?) configuration in the guide? You will have to replace 200.200.200.0/24 with the CIDR that you are using for your Neutron

Re: [openstack-dev] [stable] meeting time proposal

2015-12-16 Thread Tony Breeds
On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 08:17:03PM -0600, Matt Riedemann wrote: > 2100 UTC is 3pm for me. The latest I could probably do is 2200 UTC but I > can't do anything later than that since I have a 4 year old that has to be > picked up every day. > > The only way we probably get a meeting time that's

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack][magnum] Quota for Magnum Resources

2015-12-16 Thread Clint Byrum
Excerpts from Adrian Otto's message of 2015-12-16 16:56:39 -0800: > Clint, > > I think you are categorically dismissing a very real ops challenge of how to > set correct system limits, and how to adjust them in a running system. I have > been stung by this challenge repeatedly over the years.

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][taas] neutron ovs-agent deletes taas flows

2015-12-16 Thread Kevin Benton
If you go this route, taas will have to implement flow recovery logic itself as well if you want hitless restarts. On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 5:28 PM, Soichi Shigeta < shigeta.soi...@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote: > > Thank you for your helpful comments. > > I'd like to update my proposal as follows: > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [mistral] "Mistral HA and multi-regional support" meeting minutes

2015-12-16 Thread Anastasia Kuznetsova
Moshe, thanks for sharing these meeting minutes. I am happy to help with gate and new functional tests (probably some destructive scenarios) which will help us to test Mistral HA. On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 8:01 PM, ELISHA, Moshe (Moshe) < moshe.eli...@alcatel-lucent.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Disable 3.[3-7] gates for master?

2015-12-16 Thread Bartłomiej Piotrowski
On 2015-12-16 15:42, Alex Schultz wrote: > On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 3:33 AM, Bartłomiej Piotrowski > wrote: >> Fuelers, >> >> with the switch to CentOS 7, we also started using Puppet 3.8 in place >> of 3.4. Is there any reason to run entire range of >>

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack][magnum] Quota for Magnum Resources

2015-12-16 Thread Clint Byrum
Excerpts from Fox, Kevin M's message of 2015-12-16 16:05:29 -0800: > Yeah, as an op, I've run into a few things that need quota's that just have > basically hardcoded values. heat stacks for example. its a single global in > /etc/heat/heat.conf:max_stacks_per_tenant=100. Instead of being able to

[openstack-dev] [networking guide meeting] Meeting Tomorrow!

2015-12-16 Thread Edgar Magana
Hello All, Friendly reminder email that we have our networking guide team meeting tomorrow Thursday at 16:00 UTC in #openstack-meeting Agenda: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Documentation/NetworkingGuide/Meetings Thanks, Edgar

Re: [openstack-dev] [stable] meeting time proposal

2015-12-16 Thread Rochelle Grober
Any chance you could make the Monday meeting a few hours later? Japan and China are still mostly in bed then, but two hours would allow both to participate. --Rocky > -Original Message- > From: Matt Riedemann [mailto:mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com] > Sent: Wednesday, December 16, 2015

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance][tempest][defcore] Process to imrpove tests coverge in temepest

2015-12-16 Thread Egle Sigler
Thank you Flavio for bringing this up! We are using tempest tests for DefCore testing, and we would like to work with anyone willing to increase coverages in any of the current covered capabilities. We would also like to hear from the teams when they are planning on removing, changing, or renaming

  1   2   >