Re: [openstack-dev] Requirements for becoming approved official project

Hi Lana, Thank you for your advice regarding to documentation. I will email the list. Cheers, Shinobu On Sun, May 1, 2016 at 12:20 PM, Lana Brindley wrote: > Hi Shinobu, > > I can help you with the documentation piece, at least. > > The documentation team are

Re: [openstack-dev] Requirements for becoming approved official project

Hi Shinobu, I can help you with the documentation piece, at least. The documentation team are working on a new method to help projects document their installation guides in their own repo, with publishing to docs.openstack.org. This is explicitly to help projects meet the project navigator

[openstack-dev] [Kolla][compute-kit plugins] Nova and neutron plugin bps

Hi, Kolla core reviewers: In one of the kolla work session, the discussion came across the plugins for compute kit [1]. There are two bps I think that are relevant to this topic regarding nova and neutron: nova-docker [3] and neutron-OVN [2]. Could any kolla core help to take a look at these two

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] composable roles team

On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 4:27 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote: > Hi, > > One of the most urgent tasks we need to achieve in TripleO during > Newton cycle is the composable roles support. > So we decided to build a team that would focus on it during the next weeks. > > We started this

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][tc] Neutron stadium evolution from Austin

I have to agree with Doug. This proposal isn't saying you can't have a neutron plugin/driver, it's just that it won't be under governance of neutron. As long as the plugin and driver interfaces are there and relatively stable, you'll be able to use it. Also, if I understood correctly, you'll

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla][vote][kubernetes][infra] kolla-kubernetes repository management proposal up for vote

+1 - Hui On Sat, Apr 30, 2016 at 10:50 AM, Steven Dake (stdake) wrote: > Fellow core reviewers, > > We had a fantastic turnout at our fishbowl kubernetes as an underlay for > Kolla session. The etherpad documents the folks interested and discussion > at summit[1]. > > This

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][tc] Neutron stadium evolution from Austin

> On Apr 30, 2016, at 1:24 PM, Fawad Khaliq wrote: > > Hi folks, > > Hope everyone had a great summit in Austin and got back safe! :) > > At the design summit, we had a Neutron stadium evolution session, which needs > your immediate attention as it will impact many

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel][MySQL][DLM][Oslo][DB][Trove][Galera][operators] Multi-master writes look OK, OCF RA and more things

On 04/30/2016 10:50 AM, Clint Byrum wrote: Excerpts from Roman Podoliaka's message of 2016-04-29 12:04:49 -0700: I'm curious why you think setting wsrep_sync_wait=1 wouldn't help. The exact example appears in the Galera documentation:

[openstack-dev] [neutron][tc] Neutron stadium evolution from Austin

Hi folks, Hope everyone had a great summit in Austin and got back safe! :) At the design summit, we had a Neutron stadium evolution session, which needs your immediate attention as it will impact many stakeholders of Neutron. To summarize for everyone, our Neutron leadership made the following

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Live Migration: Austin summit update

Thanks Matt, I meant to cover CI but clearly omitted it. > On 30 Apr 2016, at 02:35, Matt Riedemann wrote: > >> On 4/29/2016 5:32 PM, Murray, Paul (HP Cloud) wrote: >> The following summarizes status of the main topics relating to live >> migration after the

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel][MySQL][DLM][Oslo][DB][Trove][Galera][operators] Multi-master writes look OK, OCF RA and more things

Excerpts from Roman Podoliaka's message of 2016-04-29 12:04:49 -0700: > Hi Bogdan, > > Thank you for sharing this! I'll need to familiarize myself with this > Jepsen thing, but overall it looks interesting. > > As it turns out, we already run Galera in multi-writer mode in Fuel > unintentionally

Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Proposed Revision to Magnum's Mission

Cool, abandoning mine as it seems the team is working on one anyway. (I just didn't want a mission statement change to wait until some unknown project comes along, someday in the future...) -Josh Davanum Srinivas wrote: Adrian, fyi, there's one more already filed by Josh -

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla][vote][kubernetes][infra] kolla-kubernetes repository management proposal up for vote

Hi Steven, Please add me to the bootstrap list too. :) Thanks. ——— Regards, Jinay Vora. On 4/30/16, 10:11 AM, "Davanum Srinivas" wrote: >Steven, > >Please add me to the bootstrap list for the k8s repo > >Thanks, >Dims > >On Sat, Apr 30, 2016 at 9:50 AM, Steven Dake

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] next min libvirt?

Hi, On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 10:13:42AM -0500, Sean Dague wrote: > We've just landed the libvirt min to bump us up to 1.2.1 required. It's > probably a good time consider the appropriate bump for Otaca. > > By that time our Ubuntu LTS will be 16.04 (libvirt 1.3.1), RHEL 7.1 > (1.2.8).

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla][vote][kubernetes][infra] kolla-kubernetes repository management proposal up for vote

Steven, Please add me to the bootstrap list for the k8s repo Thanks, Dims On Sat, Apr 30, 2016 at 9:50 AM, Steven Dake (stdake) wrote: > Fellow core reviewers, > > We had a fantastic turnout at our fishbowl kubernetes as an underlay for > Kolla session. The etherpad

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla][vote][kubernetes][infra] kolla-kubernetes repository management proposal up for vote

Also +1 :) On 30 April 2016 at 09:58, Michał Jastrzębski wrote: > Add me too please Steven. > > On 30 April 2016 at 09:50, Steven Dake (stdake) wrote: >> Fellow core reviewers, >> >> We had a fantastic turnout at our fishbowl kubernetes as an underlay for >>

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla][vote][kubernetes][infra] kolla-kubernetes repository management proposal up for vote

Add me too please Steven. On 30 April 2016 at 09:50, Steven Dake (stdake) wrote: > Fellow core reviewers, > > We had a fantastic turnout at our fishbowl kubernetes as an underlay for > Kolla session. The etherpad documents the folks interested and discussion > at summit[1]. >

[openstack-dev] [kolla][vote][kubernetes][infra] kolla-kubernetes repository management proposal up for vote

Fellow core reviewers, We had a fantastic turnout at our fishbowl kubernetes as an underlay for Kolla session. The etherpad documents the folks interested and discussion at summit[1]. This proposal is mostly based upon a combination of several discussions at open design meetings coupled with

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel][MySQL][DLM][Oslo][DB][Trove][Galera][operators] Multi-master writes look OK, OCF RA and more things

On 04/30/2016 02:57 AM, bdobre...@mirantis.com wrote: Hi Roman. That's interesting, although’s hard to believe (there is no slave lag in galera multi master). I can only suggest us to create another jepsen test to verify exactly scenario you describe. As well as other OpenStack specific

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel][MySQL][DLM][Oslo][DB][Trove][Galera][operators] Multi-master writes look OK, OCF RA and more things

Hi Roman. That's interesting, although’s hard to believe (there is no slave lag in galera multi master). I can only suggest us to create another jepsen test to verify exactly scenario you describe. As well as other OpenStack specific patterns. Regards, Bogdan. Od: Roman Podoliaka