Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Some thoughts on API microversions

2016-08-03 Thread Alex Xu
Agree with Andrew about Microversions may overused. I thought similar thing before. The Microversions should be the version control of API 'core' protocol. So I can say the protocol of send an action to server is: 'POST /servers/{uuid}/action'. We won't bump microversion for any new action or

Re: [openstack-dev] [gnocchi] Support for other drivers - influxdb

2016-08-03 Thread Sam Morrison
OK thanks Julien, I’m about to go on holiday for a month so I’ll pick this up when I return. One of our devs is playing with this and thinking of ways to support the things currently not implemented/working. Cheers, Sam > On 2 Aug 2016, at 8:35 PM, Julien Danjou wrote: >

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] nova resize on shared storage

2016-08-03 Thread Marcus Furlong
On 1 August 2016 at 14:02, Blair Bethwaite wrote: > On 1 August 2016 at 13:30, Marcus Furlong wrote: >> Looks like there is a bug open which suggests that it should be using >> RPC calls, rather than commands executed over ssh: >> >>

[openstack-dev] [Neutron] Be prepared for bumps in the road -- tenant_id columns have been renamed to project_id

2016-08-03 Thread Henry Gessau
Hello neutrinos and especially maintainers of consuming projects. The patch [1] to rename all tenant_id columns to project_id in the Neutron DB has merged. Although we have tried our best to check for dependencies and side effects, this is a very fundamental change and there may be consequences

[openstack-dev] [new][cinder] os-brick 1.5.0 release (newton)

2016-08-03 Thread no-reply
We are frolicsome to announce the release of: os-brick 1.5.0: OpenStack Cinder brick library for managing local volume attaches This release is part of the newton release series. With source available at: http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/os-brick With package available at:

Re: [openstack-dev] [Manila] Nominate Tom Barron for core reviewer team

2016-08-03 Thread Zhongjun (A)
+1 Tom will be a great addition to the core team. 发件人: Dustin Schoenbrun [mailto:dscho...@redhat.com] 发送时间: 2016年8月4日 4:55 收件人: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) 主题: Re: [openstack-dev] [Manila] Nominate Tom Barron for core reviewer team +1 Tom will be a marvelous

[openstack-dev] [new][openstack] os-client-config 1.19.0 release (newton)

2016-08-03 Thread no-reply
We are excited to announce the release of: os-client-config 1.19.0: OpenStack Client Configuation Library This release is part of the newton release series. With source available at: http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/os-client-config With package available at:

[openstack-dev] [Nova] Some thoughts on API microversions

2016-08-03 Thread Andrew Laski
I've brought some of these thoughts up a few times in conversations where the Nova team is trying to decide if a particular change warrants a microversion. I'm sure I've annoyed some people by this point because it wasn't germane to those discussions. So I'll lay this out in it's own thread. I am

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Reviewing coverage jobs set up

2016-08-03 Thread Kiall Mac Innes
On 18/07/16 20:14, Jeremy Stanley wrote: Note that this will only be true if the change's parent commit in Gerrit was the branch tip at the time it landed. Otherwise (and quite frequently in fact) you will need to identify the SHA of the merge commit which was created at the time it merged and

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] os-virtual-interfaces isn't deprecated in 2.36

2016-08-03 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 8/3/2016 1:44 AM, Alex Xu wrote: 2016-08-03 14:40 GMT+08:00 Alex Xu >: 2016-08-02 22:09 GMT+08:00 Matt Riedemann >: On 8/2/2016 2:41 AM, Alex Xu wrote:

Re: [openstack-dev] How to clone deleted branch, rre we keeping the history of the last commit id of deleted stable branches.

2016-08-03 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 8/3/2016 6:34 PM, Saju M wrote: Hi, I want to clone deleted icehouse branch of cinder. I know that, we can't clone it directly. Are we keeping the history of the last commit id of deleted stable branches. Please share the last commit id of icehouse branch of cinder if somebody know it. I

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] persistently single-vendor projects

2016-08-03 Thread Fei Long Wang
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 03/08/16 21:15, Flavio Percoco wrote: > On 02/08/16 15:13 +, Hayes, Graham wrote: >> On 02/08/2016 15:42, Flavio Percoco wrote: >>> On 01/08/16 10:19 -0400, Sean Dague wrote: On 08/01/2016 09:58 AM, Davanum Srinivas wrote: >

[openstack-dev] [nova] os-capabilities library created

2016-08-03 Thread Jay Pipes
Hi Novas and anyone interested in how to represent capabilities in a consistent fashion. I spent an hour creating a new os-capabilities Python library this evening: http://github.com/jaypipes/os-capabilities Please see the README for examples of how the library works and how I'm thinking of

Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon] [horizon-plugin] AngularJS 1.5.8

2016-08-03 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 08/03/2016 12:19 PM, Rob Cresswell wrote: > Hi all, > > Angular 1.5.8 is now updated in its XStatic > repo: https://github.com/openstack/xstatic-angular > > I've done some manual testing of the angular content and found no issues > so far. I'll be checking that the JS tests and integration

[openstack-dev] How to clone deleted branch, rre we keeping the history of the last commit id of deleted stable branches.

2016-08-03 Thread Saju M
Hi, I want to clone deleted icehouse branch of cinder. I know that, we can't clone it directly. Are we keeping the history of the last commit id of deleted stable branches. Please share the last commit id of icehouse branch of cinder if somebody know it. I need that to check working code of one

Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon] [horizon-plugin] AngularJS 1.5.8

2016-08-03 Thread Richard Jones
Let's do it, yep. On 3 August 2016 at 20:19, Rob Cresswell wrote: > Hi all, > > Angular 1.5.8 is now updated in its XStatic repo: > https://github.com/openstack/xstatic-angular > > I've done some manual testing of the angular content and found no issues > so far.

Re: [openstack-dev] [Manila] Migration APIs 2-phase vs. 1-phase

2016-08-03 Thread Rodrigo Barbieri
I would like to add more context to the mail so everybody is brought up to speed before we get into more details on tomorrow's meeting. So the main topic is what we do with the API 'migration-start', which is currently either a 1-phase migration (migrates and completes) or 2-phase (migrates up to

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] [infra] Intel NFV CI voting permission

2016-08-03 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 8/3/2016 3:02 PM, Znoinski, Waldemar wrote: Thanks Much appreciated Making use of the opportunity here... what's the next big thing a CI (like one testing NFV) should be doing? (multinode or there's something else more important?) Moshe Levi might have more input here, but I think

[openstack-dev] Project mascots update

2016-08-03 Thread Heidi Joy Tretheway
Steve Hardy wrote: "I have one question regarding the review process for the logos when they are drafted? In the cases where projects have their existing community generated logos I can imagine there will be a preference to stick with something that’s somehow derived from their existing logo…"

Re: [openstack-dev] [Manila] Nominate Tom Barron for core reviewer team

2016-08-03 Thread Dustin Schoenbrun
+1 Tom will be a marvelous resource for us to learn from! Dustin Schoenbrun OpenStack Quality Engineer Red Hat, Inc. dscho...@redhat.com On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 4:19 PM, Knight, Clinton wrote: > +1 > > Tom will be a great asset for Manila. > > Clinton > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [Manila] Nominate Tom Barron for core reviewer team

2016-08-03 Thread yang, xing
+1. Tom will be an excellent addition to the core team! Thanks, Xing From: Ben Swartzlander [b...@swartzlander.org] Sent: Wednesday, August 3, 2016 2:42 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: [openstack-dev]

Re: [openstack-dev] [Manila] Nominate Tom Barron for core reviewer team

2016-08-03 Thread Knight, Clinton
+1 Tom will be a great asset for Manila. Clinton _ From: Ravi, Goutham > Sent: Wednesday, August 3, 2016 3:01 PM Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Manila] Nominate Tom Barron for core reviewer team To: OpenStack

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] [infra] Intel NFV CI voting permission

2016-08-03 Thread Znoinski, Waldemar
Thanks Much appreciated Making use of the opportunity here... what's the next big thing a CI (like one testing NFV) should be doing? (multinode or there's something else more important?) >-Original Message- >From: Matt Riedemann [mailto:mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com] >Sent: Wednesday,

[openstack-dev] [meghdwar] meghdwar API and infra and repo integration issues and BOF help sought

2016-08-03 Thread prakash RAMCHANDRAN
Summary of Call and follow ups on Aug 3 for next Aug 10 irc call #openstack-meghdwar  Conclusions on today's call: 1. Need to get Cloudlet python client working on CLI on Ubuntu 16.04 ?Cloudlet failure on Ubuntu 16.04 to be reviewed after testing xenial VM on Openstack install

[openstack-dev] [Neutron] Can we recheck mindfully?

2016-08-03 Thread Armando M.
Folks, I have been noticing that some of us use 'recheck' as a knee jerk reaction. Please STOP! Please, take the time to look into the failure mode, see if there's a bug reported already, help the triage process, and ultimately, once you're sure that the issue is not introduced by your patch,

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] [infra] Intel NFV CI voting permission

2016-08-03 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 8/3/2016 8:18 AM, Znoinski, Waldemar wrote: [WZ] Hi Matt, do we need, a Gerrit-style, +2 on that from someone? Infra Team doesn't keep these settings in their puppet/config files on git - all the Gerrit changes are done via Gerrit GUI so they rely on Cores to add CIs to the appropriate ci

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Does this api modification need Microversion?

2016-08-03 Thread Andrew Laski
On Wed, Aug 3, 2016, at 02:24 PM, Chris Friesen wrote: > On 08/03/2016 10:53 AM, Andrew Laski wrote: > > I think the discussion about whether or not this needs a microversion is > > missing > > the bigger question of whether or not this should be in the API to begin > > with. > > I don't

Re: [openstack-dev] [watcher] Stepping down from core

2016-08-03 Thread Joe Cropper
Thanks Taylor… thanks so much for your contributions! Best, Joe > On Aug 3, 2016, at 11:32 AM, Taylor D Peoples wrote: > > Hi all, > > I'm stepping down from Watcher core and will be leaving the OpenStack > community to pursue other opportunities. > > I wasn't able to

[openstack-dev] [new][keystone] keystonemiddleware 4.8.0 release (newton)

2016-08-03 Thread no-reply
We are jubilant to announce the release of: keystonemiddleware 4.8.0: Middleware for OpenStack Identity This release is part of the newton release series. With source available at: http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/keystonemiddleware With package available at:

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] persistently single-vendor projects

2016-08-03 Thread Devdatta Kulkarni
Hi, As current PTL of one of the projects that has the team:single-vendor tag, I have following thoughts/questions on this issue. - Is the need for periodically deciding membership in the big tent primarily stemming from the question of managing resources (for the future design summits and

Re: [openstack-dev] [Manila] Nominate Tom Barron for core reviewer team

2016-08-03 Thread Sturdevant, Mark
+1 Tom will be a great addition to the core team. From: Rodrigo Barbieri [mailto:rodrigo.barbieri2...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 03, 2016 11:49 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev]

Re: [openstack-dev] Project mascots update

2016-08-03 Thread Steven Dake (stdake)
On 8/3/16, 10:37 AM, "Steven Hardy" wrote: >On Wed, Aug 03, 2016 at 10:19:10AM -0700, Heidi Joy Tretheway wrote: >>Thanks to all of you for contributing unique and inspiring ideas to >>choose >>a team mascot. You can view a list of projects that have chosen their >>

Re: [openstack-dev] [Manila] Nominate Tom Barron for core reviewer team

2016-08-03 Thread Ravi, Goutham
(Not a core member, so plus 0.02) I’ve learned a ton of things from Tom and continue to do so! From: Rodrigo Barbieri Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" Date: Wednesday, August 3, 2016 at

Re: [openstack-dev] [Manila] Nominate Tom Barron for core reviewer team

2016-08-03 Thread Rodrigo Barbieri
+1 Tom contributes a lot to the Manila project. -- Rodrigo Barbieri Computer Scientist OpenStack Manila Core Contributor Federal University of São Carlos On Aug 3, 2016 15:42, "Ben Swartzlander" wrote: > Tom (tbarron on IRC) has been working on OpenStack (both cinder

[openstack-dev] [Manila] Nominate Tom Barron for core reviewer team

2016-08-03 Thread Ben Swartzlander
Tom (tbarron on IRC) has been working on OpenStack (both cinder and manila) for more than 2 years and has spent a great deal of time on Manila reviews in the last release. Tom brings another package/distro point of view to the community as well as former storage vendor experience. -Ben

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Does this api modification need Microversion?

2016-08-03 Thread Chris Friesen
On 08/03/2016 10:53 AM, Andrew Laski wrote: I think the discussion about whether or not this needs a microversion is missing the bigger question of whether or not this should be in the API to begin with. I don't think it's actually in the API. If it's safe to rollback from this error state

Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements] race in keystone unit tests

2016-08-03 Thread Sean Dague
On 08/03/2016 12:26 PM, Lance Bragstad wrote: > Sending a follow-up because I think we ended up finding something > relevant to this discussion. > > As keystone moves towards making fernet the default, one of our work > items was to mock the system clock in tests. This allows us to advance > the

[openstack-dev] App Catalog IRC meeting Thursday August 4th

2016-08-03 Thread Christopher Aedo
Join us Thursday for our weekly meeting, scheduled for August 4th at 17:00UTC in #openstack-meeting-3 The agenda can be found here, and please add to if you want to discuss something with the Community App Catalog team: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/app-catalog Tomorrow we will be

Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements] race in keystone unit tests

2016-08-03 Thread Doug Hellmann
Excerpts from Lance Bragstad's message of 2016-08-03 11:26:56 -0500: > Sending a follow-up because I think we ended up finding something relevant > to this discussion. > > As keystone moves towards making fernet the default, one of our work items > was to mock the system clock in tests. This

Re: [openstack-dev] Project mascots update

2016-08-03 Thread Steven Hardy
On Wed, Aug 03, 2016 at 10:19:10AM -0700, Heidi Joy Tretheway wrote: >Thanks to all of you for contributing unique and inspiring ideas to choose >a team mascot. You can view a list of projects that have chosen their >mascots here: http://www.openstack.org/project-mascots, and more will

[openstack-dev] [Fuel] New version of fuel-devops (2.9.23)

2016-08-03 Thread Alexey Stepanov
Hi all! In the nearest future we are going to update the 'fuel-devops' framework on our CI to the version 2.9.23. It's bugfix-only version. As was written before, no new development is planned for this thread. Changes since 2.9.22: - fix *AddressPool._safe_create_network* method [1] List of

[openstack-dev] Project mascots update

2016-08-03 Thread Heidi Joy Tretheway
Thanks to all of you for contributing unique and inspiring ideas to choose a team mascot. You can view a list of projects that have chosen their mascots here: http://www.openstack.org/project-mascots , and more will be added soon as the last handful of

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Does this api modification need Microversion?

2016-08-03 Thread Ken'ichi Ohmichi
2016-08-03 9:53 GMT-07:00 Andrew Laski : > I think the discussion about whether or not this needs a microversion is > missing the bigger question of whether or not this should be in the API to > begin with. If it's safe to rollback from this error state why not just do > that

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Does this api modification need Microversion?

2016-08-03 Thread Andrew Laski
I think the discussion about whether or not this needs a microversion is missing the bigger question of whether or not this should be in the API to begin with. If it's safe to rollback from this error state why not just do that automatically in Nova? If it's proposed for the API because it's not

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Nova compute reports the disk usage

2016-08-03 Thread Chris Friesen
On 08/03/2016 09:13 AM, Tuan Luong wrote: Hi Jay, Thank you for the reply. Actually, I did ask this question to make sure that everything is still going well with disk usage report of Nova. We had the problem related to wrong report (IMHO it is wrong). The situation is below: - We launch an

[openstack-dev] [watcher] Stepping down from core

2016-08-03 Thread Taylor D Peoples
Hi all, I'm stepping down from Watcher core and will be leaving the OpenStack community to pursue other opportunities. I wasn't able to contribute to Watcher anywhere near the amount that I was hoping, but I have enjoyed the little that I was able to contribute. Good luck to the Watcher team

Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements] race in keystone unit tests

2016-08-03 Thread Lance Bragstad
Sending a follow-up because I think we ended up finding something relevant to this discussion. As keystone moves towards making fernet the default, one of our work items was to mock the system clock in tests. This allows us to advance the clock by one second where we need to avoid sub-second race

[openstack-dev] [tripleo] Progress on undercloud-upgrade CI job

2016-08-03 Thread Emilien Macchi
Hi, For those who missed that, I am currently working on getting an upstream CI job that will test an undercloud upgrade (from Mitaka to Newton). I am trying to get this procedure done the right way so any user outside CI will be able to out-of-the-box upgrade TripleO undercloud. Right now,

Re: [openstack-dev] pydotplus (taskflow) vs pydot-ng (fuel)

2016-08-03 Thread Joshua Harlow
If wha'ts most alive is pydot-ng that's fine with me. One of the reasons taskflow went with pydotplus is that it's used in the larger networkx graph library (which taskflow happens to use for its internal workflow graph):

Re: [openstack-dev] [api] APIs for exposing resource capabilities

2016-08-03 Thread Everett Toews
On Aug 3, 2016, at 12:59 AM, Ramakrishna, Deepti > wrote: Hi, I would like to bring your attention to my spec [1] (already approved) on capability APIs and would like to get feedback from API WG. To summarize, I propose

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Nova compute reports the disk usage

2016-08-03 Thread Tuan Luong
Hi Jay, Thank you for the reply. Actually, I did ask this question to make sure that everything is still going well with disk usage report of Nova. We had the problem related to wrong report (IMHO it is wrong). The situation is below: - We launch an instance with 600Gb of ephemeral disk of

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] persistently single-vendor projects

2016-08-03 Thread Amrith Kumar
To Steven's specific question: > If PTLs can weigh in on this thread and commit to participation in such a > cross-project subgroup, I'd be happy to lead it. I would like to participate and help get this kind of a group going. -amrith > -Original Message- > From: Steven Dake (stdake)

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Does this api modification need Microversion?

2016-08-03 Thread Jay Pipes
On 08/03/2016 10:03 AM, Matt Riedemann wrote: On 8/2/2016 1:11 AM, han.ro...@zte.com.cn wrote: patchset url: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/334747/ Allow "revert_resize" to recover error instance after resize/migrate. When resize/migrate instance, if error occurs on source compute node,

[openstack-dev] [deb-packaging][infra] We need help with merging important change requests

2016-08-03 Thread Ivan Udovichenko
Hello, Recently, change request where Thomas Goirand (zigo) proposed job [1] to build generic Debian packages was finally merged. After CR to openstack/deb-spice-html5 project [2] we've faced issue when the Infra repository is not being used during package build job. Paul Belanger already

Re: [openstack-dev] [E] [TripleO] scripts to do post deployment analysis of an overcloud

2016-08-03 Thread Joe Talerico
On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 2:04 AM, Hugh Brock wrote: > On Jul 26, 2016 8:08 PM, "Gordon, Kent" > wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > -Original Message- >> > From: Gonéri Le Bouder [mailto:gon...@lebouder.net] >> > Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2016

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Does this api modification need Microversion?

2016-08-03 Thread Alex Xu
2016-08-03 22:03 GMT+08:00 Matt Riedemann : > On 8/2/2016 1:11 AM, han.ro...@zte.com.cn wrote: > >> patchset url: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/334747/ >> >> >> >> Allow "revert_resize" to recover error instance after resize/migrate. >> >> When resize/migrate

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Improving Swift deployments with TripleO

2016-08-03 Thread Christian Schwede
Thanks Steven for your feedback! Please see my answers inline. On 02.08.16 23:46, Steven Hardy wrote: > On Tue, Aug 02, 2016 at 09:36:45PM +0200, Christian Schwede wrote: >> Hello everyone, >> >> I'd like to improve the Swift deployments done by TripleO. There are a >> few problems today when

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Does this api modification need Microversion?

2016-08-03 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 8/2/2016 1:11 AM, han.ro...@zte.com.cn wrote: patchset url: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/334747/ Allow "revert_resize" to recover error instance after resize/migrate. When resize/migrate instance, if error occurs on source compute node, instance state can rollback to active currently.

Re: [openstack-dev] [juju charms] How to configure glance charm for specific cnider backend?

2016-08-03 Thread Andrey Pavlov
Hi, Maybe I understood this option - Instead of adding one more relation to glance, I can relate my charm to new relation 'cinder-volume-service' So there is no more changes in the glance charm. And additional in my charm will be - metadata.yaml - *subordinate: trueprovides:

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] [infra] Intel NFV CI voting permission

2016-08-03 Thread Znoinski, Waldemar
>-Original Message- >From: Znoinski, Waldemar [mailto:waldemar.znoin...@intel.com] >Sent: Monday, August 1, 2016 6:52 PM >To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > >Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] [infra] Intel NFV CI

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] Pending removal of Scality volume driver

2016-08-03 Thread Nicolas Trangez
Sean, Jordan, who's managing this, is currently in holidays. Furthermore we're experiencing some hardware issues with the lab used by the CI system to run the tests complicating things. Any chance we could get some more time for Jordan to look into this? Thanks, Nicolas On Wed, 2016-08-03 at

[openstack-dev] [trove] Weekly meeting today, canceled today

2016-08-03 Thread Amrith Kumar
I'm going to cancel today's weekly trove meeting for a couple of reasons. We had our mid-cycle last week and went through a lot of the backlog of items, and there are a couple of people who are out today so attendance and agenda are kind-of thin. If there is something urgent that you would

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Nova compute reports the disk usage

2016-08-03 Thread Jay Pipes
On 08/03/2016 04:35 AM, Tuan Luong wrote: Hi, When we try to add ephemeral disk in booting instance, as we know that it will create disk.local and the backing file in _/base. Both of them are referred to the ephemeral disk. When nova reports the disk usage of compute, does it count both of them

[openstack-dev] [new][oslo] oslo.db 4.10.0 release (newton)

2016-08-03 Thread no-reply
We are psyched to announce the release of: oslo.db 4.10.0: Oslo Database library This release is part of the newton release series. With source available at: http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/oslo.db With package available at: https://pypi.python.org/pypi/oslo.db Please report

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] [ironic] Exception registering nodes when Ironic API with apache

2016-08-03 Thread Emilien Macchi
On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 6:06 AM, Lucas Alvares Gomes wrote: > Hi, > >> On Friday we landed a patch in TripleO to deploy Ironic API in WSGI with >> Apache. >> Since then, our baremetal CI jobs were failing randomly, and a lot of >> time, with an exception. >> I decided to

Re: [openstack-dev] 答复: [neutron][dvr][fip] fg device allocated private ip address

2016-08-03 Thread huangdenghui
Hi zhuna I think carl means that there is not need dynamic route protocol here, arp proxy is enough, but i have a concern here, upstream router should have a mechanism to let private gateway ip address as arp source protocol address, since fg device has private ip address? At

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] [ironic] Exception registering nodes when Ironic API with apache

2016-08-03 Thread Jim Rollenhagen
On Sun, Jul 31, 2016 at 07:01:16PM -0400, Emilien Macchi wrote: > Hi, > > On Friday we landed a patch in TripleO to deploy Ironic API in WSGI with > Apache. > Since then, our baremetal CI jobs were failing randomly, and a lot of > time, with an exception. > I decided to revert the patch to bring

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] Pending removal of Scality volume driver

2016-08-03 Thread Erlon Cruz
Hi sean, I think it would worth to CC the contact info informed in the CI Wiki (openstack...@scality.com). On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 4:26 PM, Sean McGinnis wrote: > Tomorrow is the one week grace period. I just ran the last comment > script and it still shows it's been 112

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] Stepping Down.

2016-08-03 Thread Davanum Srinivas
Thanks for your guidance/help/work/time Morgan! -- Dims On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 4:18 PM, Morgan Fainberg wrote: > Based upon my personal time demands among a number of other reasons I will > be stepping down from the Technical Committee. This is planned to take >

[openstack-dev] [horizon] [horizon-plugin] AngularJS 1.5.8

2016-08-03 Thread Rob Cresswell
Hi all, Angular 1.5.8 is now updated in its XStatic repo: https://github.com/openstack/xstatic-angular I've done some manual testing of the angular content and found no issues so far. I'll be checking that the JS tests and integration tests pass too; if they do, would it be desirable to

Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon] Angular panel enable/disable not overridable in local_settings

2016-08-03 Thread Rob Cresswell
Ah, I see. I think I can understand why that was done initially, but since using UPDATE_HORIZON_CONFIG is already going beyond the scope of the enabled file since its directly affecting an exposed setting, I think we should just use the setting (and document it appropriately in the

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] [ironic] Exception registering nodes when Ironic API with apache

2016-08-03 Thread Lucas Alvares Gomes
Hi, > On Friday we landed a patch in TripleO to deploy Ironic API in WSGI with > Apache. > Since then, our baremetal CI jobs were failing randomly, and a lot of > time, with an exception. > I decided to revert the patch to bring our CI back: > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/349281/ (+2 from

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] persistently single-vendor projects

2016-08-03 Thread Flavio Percoco
On 02/08/16 15:13 +, Hayes, Graham wrote: On 02/08/2016 15:42, Flavio Percoco wrote: On 01/08/16 10:19 -0400, Sean Dague wrote: On 08/01/2016 09:58 AM, Davanum Srinivas wrote: Thierry, Ben, Doug, How can we distinguish between. "Project is doing the right thing, but others are not

[openstack-dev] [tricircle]agenda of weekly meeting Aug.3

2016-08-03 Thread joehuang
Hi, team, IRC meeting: https://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=openstack-meetingon every Wednesday starting from UTC 13:00. The agenda of this weekly meeting is: # progress review in feature parity, cross pod L2 networking, dynamic pod binding:

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [searchlight] What do we need in notification payload?

2016-08-03 Thread Hirofumi Ichihara
Thank you for your quick reply. On 2016/08/01 23:31, McLellan, Steven wrote: In our (Searchlight's) ideal world, every notification about a resource would contain the full representation of that resource (for instance, equivalent to the API response for a resource), because it means that each

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][tc] establishing project-wide goals

2016-08-03 Thread Flavio Percoco
On 02/08/16 17:29 +0200, Thierry Carrez wrote: Doug Hellmann wrote: [...] Likewise, what if the Manila project team decides they aren't interested in supporting Python 3.5 or a particular greenlet library du jour that has been mandated upon them? Is the only filesystem-as-a-service project

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] Stepping Down.

2016-08-03 Thread Flavio Percoco
On 02/08/16 13:18 -0700, Morgan Fainberg wrote: Based upon my personal time demands among a number of other reasons I will be stepping down from the Technical Committee. This is planned to take effect with the next TC election so that my seat will be up to be filled at that time. Thanks for

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack] [networking-sfc] Flow classifier conflict logic

2016-08-03 Thread Artem Plakunov
100.* $ neutron port-show 429fdb89-1bfa-4dc1-bb89-25373501ebde | grep tenant_id | tenant_id | 0dafd2d782f4445798363ba9b27e104f | $ neutron port-show ca7f8fdf-a1ff-4cd7-8897-9f6ca5220be6 | grep tenant_id | tenant_id | 0dafd2d782f4445798363ba9b27e104f | $ neutron port-show

[openstack-dev] [Nova] Nova compute reports the disk usage

2016-08-03 Thread Tuan Luong
Hi, When we try to add ephemeral disk in booting instance, as we know that it will create disk.local and the backing file in _base. Both of them are referred to the ephemeral disk. When nova reports the disk usage of compute, does it count both of them for the used disk? What I see in the

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Removal of live_migration_flag and block_migration_flag config options

2016-08-03 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Tue, Aug 02, 2016 at 02:36:32PM +, Koniszewski, Pawel wrote: > In Mitaka development cycle 'live_migration_flag' and 'block_migration_flag' > have been marked as deprecated for removal. I'm working on a patch [1] to > remove both of them and want to ask what we should do with >

[openstack-dev] 答复: [neutron][dvr][fip] fg device allocated private ip address

2016-08-03 Thread zhuna
Hi Carl, IMO, if the upstream router has the route to floating ip subnet, no need to assign additional IP address to the router. For example, there are 2 subnets in external network, Subnet1: 10.0.0.0/24 (fg ip address) Subnet2: 9.0.0.0/24 (fip) Suppose assign fip 9.0.0.10 for vm1, and the fg

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] [scheduler] Use ResourceProviderTags instead of ResourceClass?

2016-08-03 Thread Alex Xu
2016-08-03 2:12 GMT+08:00 Jay Pipes : > On 08/02/2016 08:19 AM, Alex Xu wrote: > >> Chris have a thought about using ResourceClass to describe Capabilities >> with an infinite inventory. In the beginning we brain storming the idea >> of Tags, Tan Lin have same thought, but we

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] os-virtual-interfaces isn't deprecated in 2.36

2016-08-03 Thread Alex Xu
2016-08-03 14:40 GMT+08:00 Alex Xu : > > > 2016-08-02 22:09 GMT+08:00 Matt Riedemann : > >> On 8/2/2016 2:41 AM, Alex Xu wrote: >> >>> A little strange we have two API endpoints, one is >>> '/servers/{uuid}/os-interfaces', another one is >>>

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] os-virtual-interfaces isn't deprecated in 2.36

2016-08-03 Thread Alex Xu
2016-08-02 22:09 GMT+08:00 Matt Riedemann : > On 8/2/2016 2:41 AM, Alex Xu wrote: > >> A little strange we have two API endpoints, one is >> '/servers/{uuid}/os-interfaces', another one is >> '/servers/{uuid}/os-virtual-interfaces'. >> >> I prefer to keep

[openstack-dev] [api] APIs for exposing resource capabilities

2016-08-03 Thread Ramakrishna, Deepti
Hi, I would like to bring your attention to my spec [1] (already approved) on capability APIs and would like to get feedback from API WG. To summarize, I propose defining a capability API for every resource in a REST API where it makes sense and is needed. In the context of Cinder, we