Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] [stable] [all] Changing stable policy for drivers

2016-08-09 Thread Tony Breeds
On Tue, Aug 09, 2016 at 09:16:02PM -0700, John Griffith wrote: > Sorry, I wasn't a part of the sessions in Austin on the topic of long > terms support of Cinder drivers. There's a lot going on during the summits > these days. For the record the session in Austin, that I think Matt was

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] [stable] [all] Changing stable policy for drivers

2016-08-09 Thread John Griffith
On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 10:26 PM, Matthew Treinish wrote: > On Tue, Aug 09, 2016 at 09:16:02PM -0700, John Griffith wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 7:21 PM, Matthew Treinish > > wrote: > > > > > On Tue, Aug 09, 2016 at 05:28:52PM -0700, John Griffith

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Neutron Port MAC Address Uniqueness

2016-08-09 Thread huangdenghui
hi Armando I think this feature causes problem in sriov scenario, since sriov NIC don't support the vf has the same mac,even the port belongs to the different network. 发自网易邮箱手机版 On 2016-08-10 04:55 , Armando M. Wrote: On 9 August 2016 at 13:53, Anil Rao

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] [stable] [all] Changing stable policy for drivers

2016-08-09 Thread Matthew Treinish
On Tue, Aug 09, 2016 at 09:16:02PM -0700, John Griffith wrote: > On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 7:21 PM, Matthew Treinish > wrote: > > > On Tue, Aug 09, 2016 at 05:28:52PM -0700, John Griffith wrote: > > > On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 4:53 PM, Sean McGinnis > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] [stable] [all] Changing stable policy for drivers

2016-08-09 Thread John Griffith
On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 7:21 PM, Matthew Treinish wrote: > On Tue, Aug 09, 2016 at 05:28:52PM -0700, John Griffith wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 4:53 PM, Sean McGinnis > wrote: > > > > > . > > > > > > > > Mike, you must have left the midcycle by

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] [stable] [all] Changing stable policy for drivers

2016-08-09 Thread Tony Breeds
On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 01:39:55AM +, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > So I guess what I'm asking: If stable branches exist as a place for > package maintainers to collaborate on a common set of backported > fixes, and are not actually usable to that end, why do we continue > to provide them? I don't

[openstack-dev] [tacker]

2016-08-09 Thread gong_ys2004
Hi Sridhar, You said in https://review.openstack.org/#/c/255146/ we should not expose the infra_driver and mgmt_driver to user,but they have been already exposed by API at  https://github.com/openstack/tacker/blob/master/tacker/extensions/vnfm.py#L205, so what do you think?Do we need remove the

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] [stable] [all] Changing stable policy for drivers

2016-08-09 Thread Tony Breeds
On Tue, Aug 09, 2016 at 10:21:19PM -0400, Matthew Treinish wrote: > I fully understood the proposal but I still think you're optimizing for the > wrong thing. We have a community process for doing backports and maintaining > released versions of OpenStack code. The fundamental problem here is

[openstack-dev] [Neutron][networking-ovn]How to enable vxlan as default tenant_network_types use devstack and ovn

2016-08-09 Thread Wilence Yao
Hi all, The default tenant_network_types is geneve, after installed following this document http://docs.openstack.org/developer/networking-ovn/testing.html ``` [ml2] tenant_network_types = geneve extension_drivers = port_security type_drivers = local,flat,vlan,geneve ``` To enable vxlan, I

Re: [openstack-dev] [python-bileanclient] [infra] Duplicate entriesin test-requirement.txt

2016-08-09 Thread 吕冬兵
Hi, The issue still exists after the https://review.openstack.org/352490 merged, what else should I do? http://logs.openstack.org/58/351458/8/check/gate-python-bileanclient-requirements/fa1119c/console.html -- Original -- From: "Jeremy

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] [stable] [all] Changing stable policy for drivers

2016-08-09 Thread Matthew Treinish
On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 01:39:55AM +, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > On 2016-08-09 15:56:57 -0700 (-0700), Mike Perez wrote: > > As others have said and as being a Cinder stable core myself, the status-quo > > and this proposal itself are terrible practices because there is no testing > > behind it,

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] [stable] [all] Changing stable policy for drivers

2016-08-09 Thread Matthew Treinish
On Tue, Aug 09, 2016 at 05:28:52PM -0700, John Griffith wrote: > On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 4:53 PM, Sean McGinnis wrote: > > > . > > > > > > Mike, you must have left the midcycle by the time this topic came > > > up. On the issue of out-of-tree drivers, I specifically offered

[openstack-dev] [nova] Nova API sub-team meeting

2016-08-09 Thread Alex Xu
Hi, We have weekly Nova API meeting today. The meeting is being held Wednesday UTC1300 and irc channel is #openstack-meeting-4. The proposed agenda and meeting details are here: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/NovaAPI Please feel free to add items to the agenda. Thanks

[openstack-dev] [neutron][lbaas][api]API returns incorrectly when filtering fields in every LBaaS resource

2016-08-09 Thread zhi
hi, all. I have faced some strange problems when getting LBaaS resources, such as loadbalancers, listeners, pools, etc. For example, when I send a request which only filtering "id" attribute, like this: >>> curl -g -i -X GET http://10.0.44.233:9696/v2.0/lbaas/listeners.json?fields=id \

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] [stable] [all] Changing stable policy for drivers

2016-08-09 Thread Jeremy Stanley
On 2016-08-09 15:56:57 -0700 (-0700), Mike Perez wrote: > As others have said and as being a Cinder stable core myself, the status-quo > and this proposal itself are terrible practices because there is no testing > behind it, thereby it not being up to the community QA standards set. [...] In

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Fernet Key rotation

2016-08-09 Thread Adam Young
On 08/09/2016 06:00 PM, Zane Bitter wrote: In either case a good mechanism might be to use a Heat Software Deployment via the Heat API directly (i.e. not as part of a stack) to push changes to the servers. (I say 'push' but it's more a case of making the data available for os-collect-config

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] [stable] [all] Changing stable policy for drivers

2016-08-09 Thread John Griffith
On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 4:53 PM, Sean McGinnis wrote: > . > > > > Mike, you must have left the midcycle by the time this topic came > > up. On the issue of out-of-tree drivers, I specifically offered this > > proposal (a community managed mechanism for distributing driver >

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] [stable] [all] Changing stable policy for drivers

2016-08-09 Thread Sean McGinnis
. > > Mike, you must have left the midcycle by the time this topic came > up. On the issue of out-of-tree drivers, I specifically offered this > proposal (a community managed mechanism for distributing driver > bugfix backports) as an compromise alternative to try to address the > needs of both

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] [stable] [all] Changing stable policy for drivers

2016-08-09 Thread Ben Swartzlander
On 08/09/2016 06:56 PM, Mike Perez wrote: On 10:31 Aug 06, Sean McGinnis wrote: I'm open and welcome to any feedback on this. Unless there are any major concerns raised, I will at least instruct any Cinder stable cores to start allowing these bugfix patches through past the security only

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] [stable] [all] Changing stable policy for drivers

2016-08-09 Thread Sean McGinnis
On Tue, Aug 09, 2016 at 03:56:57PM -0700, Mike Perez wrote: > If you want to change that, work with the stable team on the various options > provided. This tangent of people whining on the mailing list and in > #openstack-cinder is not going to accomplish anything. That's what we're doing here

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] [stable] [all] Changing stable policy for drivers

2016-08-09 Thread Ben Swartzlander
On 08/09/2016 05:45 PM, Mike Perez wrote: On 19:40 Aug 08, Duncan Thomas wrote: On 8 August 2016 at 18:31, Matthew Treinish wrote: This argument comes up at least once a cycle and there is a reason we don't do this. When we EOL a branch all of the infrastructure for

[openstack-dev] Nova mascot

2016-08-09 Thread Heidi Joy Tretheway
TL;DR: If you don’t want a mascot, you don’t have to. But Nova, you’ll be missed. :-) A few notes following up on Matt Riedemann, Clint Byrum, Daniel Berrange’s conversation regarding the Nova mascot… Nova doesn’t have to have a mascot if the majority of the team doesn’t want one. I’m not

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Neutron Port MAC Address Uniqueness

2016-08-09 Thread Anil Rao
Thanks Armando. -Anil From: Armando M. [mailto:arma...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 09, 2016 1:55 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Neutron Port MAC Address Uniqueness On 9 August 2016 at 13:53, Anil Rao

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] [stable] [all] Changing stable policy for drivers

2016-08-09 Thread Mike Perez
On 10:31 Aug 06, Sean McGinnis wrote: > I'm open and welcome to any feedback on this. Unless there are any major > concerns raised, I will at least instruct any Cinder stable cores to > start allowing these bugfix patches through past the security only > phase. As others have said and as being a

Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements] History lesson please

2016-08-09 Thread Tony Breeds
On Tue, Aug 09, 2016 at 03:14:43PM -0400, Davanum Srinivas wrote: > +1 for volunteers to step up. I'll do it and I have a *very* basic prototype done. It wont be in Newton though. Having said that if there is another volenteer I'm happy to work with them or free up time :) Yours Tony. PS:

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Fernet Key rotation

2016-08-09 Thread Fox, Kevin M
It needs to work in a distributed way... What happens if the one node you have cron running on doesn't work for a while. Keystone breaks? If the undercloud deploys a timed workfow where the workflow can fail over from machine to machine, that would work. Thanks, Kevin

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Fernet Key rotation

2016-08-09 Thread Zane Bitter
On 09/08/16 17:11, Adam Young wrote: The Fernet token format uses a symmetric key to sign tokens. In order to check the signature, these keys need to be synchronized across all of the Keystone servers. I don't want to pass around nake symmetric keys. The right way to do this is to put them

[openstack-dev] [third-party] [ci] Please PIN your 3rd party ci setup to zuul v. 2.5.0

2016-08-09 Thread Asselin, Ramy
All, In the previous e-mail, [1] was recommending 3rd party ci to pin zuul to v. 2.1.0, but this has pip dependency conflicts with nodepool 0.3.0 when installed on the same VM (common case typical for 3rd party ci) causing zuul service to fail to start. This is fixed by using the newly created

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] [stable] [all] Changing stable policy for drivers

2016-08-09 Thread Mike Perez
On 19:40 Aug 08, Duncan Thomas wrote: > On 8 August 2016 at 18:31, Matthew Treinish wrote: > > > > > This argument comes up at least once a cycle and there is a reason we > > don't do > > this. When we EOL a branch all of the infrastructure for running any ci > > against >

Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum][heat] 2 million requests / sec, 100s of nodes

2016-08-09 Thread Zane Bitter
On 07/08/16 19:52, Clint Byrum wrote: Excerpts from Steve Baker's message of 2016-08-08 10:11:29 +1200: On 05/08/16 21:48, Ricardo Rocha wrote: Hi. Quick update is 1000 nodes and 7 million reqs/sec :) - and the number of requests should be higher but we had some internal issues. We have a

[openstack-dev] [tripleo] Fernet Key rotation

2016-08-09 Thread Adam Young
The Fernet token format uses a symmetric key to sign tokens. In order to check the signature, these keys need to be synchronized across all of the Keystone servers. I don't want to pass around nake symmetric keys. The right way to do this is to put them into a PKCS 11 Envelope. Roughly,

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] [stable] [all] Changing stable policy for drivers

2016-08-09 Thread Chris Friesen
On 08/09/2016 02:10 PM, Ben Swartzlander wrote: The best example of why this is good is Linux. If you tell the Linux people to take their drivers out of the tree I can guarantee you they'll laugh you out of the room. The reasons for their stance are many and I won't recount them here (unless

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Neutron Port MAC Address Uniqueness

2016-08-09 Thread Armando M.
On 9 August 2016 at 13:53, Anil Rao wrote: > Is the MAC address of a Neutron port on a tenant virtual network globally > unique or unique just within that particular tenant network? > The latter:

[openstack-dev] [neutron] Neutron Port MAC Address Uniqueness

2016-08-09 Thread Anil Rao
Is the MAC address of a Neutron port on a tenant virtual network globally unique or unique just within that particular tenant network? Thanks, Anil __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe:

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] [stable] [all] Changing stable policy for drivers

2016-08-09 Thread Walter A. Boring IV
On 08/09/2016 11:52 AM, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: Walter A. Boring IV wrote: On 08/08/2016 02:28 PM, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: Duncan Thomas wrote: On 8 August 2016 at 21:12, Matthew Treinish wrote: Ignoring all that, this

Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] 2 million requests / sec, 100s of nodes

2016-08-09 Thread Ricardo Rocha
On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 10:00 PM, Clint Byrum wrote: > Excerpts from Ricardo Rocha's message of 2016-08-08 11:51:00 +0200: >> Hi. >> >> On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 1:52 AM, Clint Byrum wrote: >> > Excerpts from Steve Baker's message of 2016-08-08 10:11:29 +1200: >>

[openstack-dev] [kolla][ironic][odm][ACTION NEEDED] Kolla's BiFrost and kolla-host work

2016-08-09 Thread Steven Dake (stdake)
Sean has done a fantastic job on the BiFrost work and kolla-host work. What is needed is the last step - which is a final thorough technical review from the core review team so we can get it merged by end of week. If your struggling to find the work in the review queue, use this link:

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] [stable] [all] Changing stable policy for drivers

2016-08-09 Thread Ben Swartzlander
On 08/09/2016 03:01 PM, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: Walter A. Boring IV wrote: I think "currently active stable branches" is key there. These branches would no longer be "currently active". They would get an EOL tag when it reaches the end of the support phases. We just

Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] 2 million requests / sec, 100s of nodes

2016-08-09 Thread Clint Byrum
Excerpts from Ricardo Rocha's message of 2016-08-08 11:51:00 +0200: > Hi. > > On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 1:52 AM, Clint Byrum wrote: > > Excerpts from Steve Baker's message of 2016-08-08 10:11:29 +1200: > >> On 05/08/16 21:48, Ricardo Rocha wrote: > >> > Hi. > >> > > >> > Quick

[openstack-dev] [tosca-parser] [heat-translator] [heat] [tacker] [opnfv] TOSCA-Parser 0.6.0 release

2016-08-09 Thread Sahdev P Zala
Hello Everyone, On behalf of the TOSCA-Parser team, I am pleased to announce the 0.6.0 PyPI release of tosca-parser which can be downloaded from https://pypi.python.org/pypi/tosca-parser This release includes following enhancements: Python 3.5 support Support for TOSCA Repository which is an

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] [stable] [all] Changing stable policy for drivers

2016-08-09 Thread Hayes, Graham
On 09/08/2016 19:58, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: > Walter A. Boring IV wrote: > >> On 08/08/2016 02:28 PM, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: >>> Duncan Thomas wrote: >>> On 8 August 2016 at 21:12, Matthew Treinish wrote: Ignoring

Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements] History lesson please

2016-08-09 Thread Davanum Srinivas
+1 for volunteers to step up. -- Dims On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 3:07 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: > Excerpts from John Dickinson's message of 2016-08-09 11:14:57 -0700: >> I'd like to advocate for *not* raising minimum versions very often. Every >> time some OpenStack project

Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements] History lesson please

2016-08-09 Thread Doug Hellmann
Excerpts from Hayes, Graham's message of 2016-08-09 18:54:57 +: > On 09/08/2016 19:41, John Dickinson wrote: > > > > > > On 9 Aug 2016, at 11:33, Ian Cordasco wrote: > > > >> > >> > >> -Original Message- > >> From: John Dickinson > >> Reply: OpenStack Development Mailing

Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements] History lesson please

2016-08-09 Thread Doug Hellmann
Excerpts from John Dickinson's message of 2016-08-09 11:14:57 -0700: > I'd like to advocate for *not* raising minimum versions very often. Every > time some OpenStack project raises minimum versions, this change is > propagated to all projects, and that puts extra burden on anyone who is >

Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements] History lesson please

2016-08-09 Thread Matthew Thode
On 08/09/2016 01:37 PM, John Dickinson wrote: > In that case, they are still co-installable, because the nova minimum > satisfies both. The requirements project currently advocates the use of upper-requirements.txt as what is targeted for packagers. This is what's tested. -- -- Matthew Thode

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] [stable] [all] Changing stable policy for drivers

2016-08-09 Thread Ihar Hrachyshka
Walter A. Boring IV wrote: I think "currently active stable branches" is key there. These branches would no longer be "currently active". They would get an EOL tag when it reaches the end of the support phases. We just wouldn't delete the branch. This argument comes up

Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements] History lesson please

2016-08-09 Thread Hayes, Graham
On 09/08/2016 19:41, John Dickinson wrote: > > > On 9 Aug 2016, at 11:33, Ian Cordasco wrote: > >> >> >> -Original Message- >> From: John Dickinson >> Reply: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) >> >> Date: August

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] [stable] [all] Changing stable policy for drivers

2016-08-09 Thread Ihar Hrachyshka
Walter A. Boring IV wrote: On 08/08/2016 02:28 PM, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: Duncan Thomas wrote: On 8 August 2016 at 21:12, Matthew Treinish wrote: Ignoring all that, this is also contrary to how we perform testing in

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Making the nonha-multinode and undercloud jobs voting

2016-08-09 Thread Paul Belanger
On Tue, Aug 09, 2016 at 01:14:24PM -0400, James Slagle wrote: > I've proposed: > https://review.openstack.org/353019 > > which makes gate-tripleo-ci-centos-7-nonha-multinode-nv and > gate-tripleo-ci-centos-7-undercloud-nv become voting jobs. > > I think these jobs have proven to be stable enough

Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements] History lesson please

2016-08-09 Thread John Dickinson
On 9 Aug 2016, at 11:33, Ian Cordasco wrote: >   > > -Original Message- > From: John Dickinson > Reply: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > > Date: August 9, 2016 at 13:17:08 > To: OpenStack Development

Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements] History lesson please

2016-08-09 Thread Ian Cordasco
  -Original Message- From: John Dickinson Reply: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Date: August 9, 2016 at 13:17:08 To: OpenStack Development Mailing List Subject:  Re:

Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements] History lesson please

2016-08-09 Thread Davanum Srinivas
fyi, Just so you all know. It's upper-constraints.txt. Note the word "upper" :) -- Dims On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 2:25 PM, Julien Danjou wrote: > On Tue, Aug 09 2016, John Dickinson wrote: > >> I'd like to advocate for *not* raising minimum versions very often. Every >> time

Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements] History lesson please

2016-08-09 Thread Julien Danjou
On Tue, Aug 09 2016, John Dickinson wrote: > I'd like to advocate for *not* raising minimum versions very often. Every time > some OpenStack project raises minimum versions, this change is propagated to > all projects, and that puts extra burden on anyone who is maintaining packages > and

Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements] History lesson please

2016-08-09 Thread John Dickinson
I'd like to advocate for *not* raising minimum versions very often. Every time some OpenStack project raises minimum versions, this change is propagated to all projects, and that puts extra burden on anyone who is maintaining packages and dependencies in their own deployment. If one project

Re: [openstack-dev] 答复: [neutron][dvr][fip] fg device allocated private ip address

2016-08-09 Thread Carl Baldwin
On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 1:22 AM, zhuna wrote: > Hi Carl, > > > > IMO, if the upstream router has the route to floating ip subnet, no need > to assign additional IP address to the router. > > > > For example, there are 2 subnets in external network, > > Subnet1: 10.0.0.0/24

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Making the nonha-multinode and undercloud jobs voting

2016-08-09 Thread James Slagle
On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 1:30 PM, Michele Baldessari wrote: > Hi James, > > On Tue, Aug 09, 2016 at 01:14:24PM -0400, James Slagle wrote: >> I've proposed: >> https://review.openstack.org/353019 >> >> which makes gate-tripleo-ci-centos-7-nonha-multinode-nv and >>

[openstack-dev] [puppet] proposal: start gating on puppet4

2016-08-09 Thread Emilien Macchi
Hi, Today Puppet OpenStack CI is running unit and functional test jobs against puppet 3 and puppet 4. Unit jobs for puppet 4 are currently voting and pretty stable. Functional jobs for puppet 4 are not voting but also stable. Even if Puppet4 has not been largely adopted by our community [1] yet,

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] [stable] [all] Changing stable policy for drivers

2016-08-09 Thread Walter A. Boring IV
On 08/08/2016 02:28 PM, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: Duncan Thomas wrote: On 8 August 2016 at 21:12, Matthew Treinish wrote: Ignoring all that, this is also contrary to how we perform testing in OpenStack. We don't turn off entire classes of testing

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] [stable] [all] Changing stable policy for drivers

2016-08-09 Thread Walter A. Boring IV
I think "currently active stable branches" is key there. These branches would no longer be "currently active". They would get an EOL tag when it reaches the end of the support phases. We just wouldn't delete the branch. This argument comes up at least once a cycle and there is a reason we

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Making the nonha-multinode and undercloud jobs voting

2016-08-09 Thread James Slagle
On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 1:14 PM, James Slagle wrote: > I've proposed: > https://review.openstack.org/353019 > > which makes gate-tripleo-ci-centos-7-nonha-multinode-nv and > gate-tripleo-ci-centos-7-undercloud-nv become voting jobs. > > I think these jobs have proven to be

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Making the nonha-multinode and undercloud jobs voting

2016-08-09 Thread Michele Baldessari
Hi James, On Tue, Aug 09, 2016 at 01:14:24PM -0400, James Slagle wrote: > I've proposed: > https://review.openstack.org/353019 > > which makes gate-tripleo-ci-centos-7-nonha-multinode-nv and > gate-tripleo-ci-centos-7-undercloud-nv become voting jobs. definitely +1 for the

[openstack-dev] [TripleO] Making the nonha-multinode and undercloud jobs voting

2016-08-09 Thread James Slagle
I've proposed: https://review.openstack.org/353019 which makes gate-tripleo-ci-centos-7-nonha-multinode-nv and gate-tripleo-ci-centos-7-undercloud-nv become voting jobs. I think these jobs have proven to be stable enough that we can promote them to be voting. If you have concerns, please vote on

[openstack-dev] [Gluon] IRC Meeting canceled this week (8/10)

2016-08-09 Thread HU, BIN
Hello team, The IRC meeting this week (8/10) is canceled. Thank you Bin __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla][osic] OSIC cluster status

2016-08-09 Thread Paul Bourke
Update Aug 9th: We are on scenario two: 3 control, 20 storage, 100 compute with Ceph. Notes are now being collected in https://review.openstack.org/#/c/352101/ along with tempest/rally results. -Paul On 05/08/16 17:48, Paul Bourke wrote: Hi Kolla, Thought it will be helpful to send a

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Nova mascot

2016-08-09 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Tue, Aug 09, 2016 at 11:26:21AM -0500, Matt Riedemann wrote: > On 8/8/2016 4:10 PM, Clint Byrum wrote: > > Excerpts from Matt Riedemann's message of 2016-08-08 14:35:12 -0500: > > > Not to be a major curmudgeon but I think we'd basically decided at the > > > midcycle (actually weeks before)

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Nova mascot

2016-08-09 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 8/8/2016 4:10 PM, Clint Byrum wrote: Excerpts from Matt Riedemann's message of 2016-08-08 14:35:12 -0500: Not to be a major curmudgeon but I think we'd basically decided at the midcycle (actually weeks before) that Nova wasn't doing the mascot thing. Could you maybe summarize the reason

Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements] History lesson please

2016-08-09 Thread Ian Cordasco
  -Original Message- From: Sean Dague Reply: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Date: August 9, 2016 at 11:21:47 To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Subject:  Re:

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] How should ironic and related project names be written?

2016-08-09 Thread Loo, Ruby
Honestly, I don't think it matters what we use in our specifications, since specifications are not public documents. Personally, in specifications, I am fine with any of the proposed because they are all understandable! IF we have to decide on something or if we want some preferred ways, then

Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements] History lesson please

2016-08-09 Thread Sean Dague
On 08/09/2016 11:25 AM, Matthew Thode wrote: > On 08/09/2016 10:22 AM, Ian Cordasco wrote: >> -Original Message- >> From: Matthew Thode >> Reply: prometheanf...@gentoo.org , OpenStack >> Development Mailing List (not for usage

Re: [openstack-dev] [charms] nominating thedac for charms-release team

2016-08-09 Thread James Page
On Mon, 8 Aug 2016 at 18:19 Ryan Beisner wrote: > Greetings, > > I would like to nominate David Ames for addition to the > charms-release team, as he has played a valuable role in the charm release > processes. This change will grant privileges such as new stable

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] static Portgroup support.

2016-08-09 Thread Jay Pipes
On 08/09/2016 04:28 AM, Vasyl Saienko wrote: Hello Ironic'ers! We've recorded a demo that shows how static portgroup works at the moment: Flat network scenario: https://youtu.be/vBlH0ie6Lm4 Multitenant network scenario: https://youtu.be/Kk5Cc_K1tV8 Just watched both the above demo videos.

[openstack-dev] [Smaug][Karbor] Smaug is now Karbor

2016-08-09 Thread Saggi Mizrahi
Hi everybody, As a community we've decided we want to change the name of the project. We felt that the name wasn't distinctive enough and might cause confusion when looking for the project. It was a long process but we've decide on the name Karbor. Please bear with us while we move things around.

Re: [openstack-dev] [smaug] voting for the project mascot

2016-08-09 Thread Edward Lee
Is this a secret ballot? 2016-08-09 17:54 GMT+08:00 xiangxinyong : > Hello guys, > > Smaug is voting for the project mascot. > Please feel free to give your vote:) > https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/smaugmascot > > Thanks very much. > > Best Regards, > xiangxinyong > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [puppet] weekly meeting #89

2016-08-09 Thread Emilien Macchi
d it here: > https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/puppet-openstack-weekly-meeting-20160809 > > See you tomorrow, > > On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 11:06 AM, Emilien Macchi <emil...@redhat.com> wrote: >> no item in our agenda, we cancelled the meeting, see you next week! >>

Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements] History lesson please

2016-08-09 Thread Matthew Thode
On 08/09/2016 10:22 AM, Ian Cordasco wrote: > -Original Message- > From: Matthew Thode > Reply: prometheanf...@gentoo.org , OpenStack > Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > > Date:

Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements] History lesson please

2016-08-09 Thread Ian Cordasco
-Original Message- From: Matthew Thode Reply: prometheanf...@gentoo.org , OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Date: August 9, 2016 at 09:53:53 To: 

Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements] History lesson please

2016-08-09 Thread Doug Hellmann
Excerpts from Tony Breeds's message of 2016-08-09 16:38:35 +1000: > Hi all, > I guess this is aimed at the long term requirements team members. > > The current policy for approving requirements[1] bumps contains the following > text: > > Changes to update the minimum version of a

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance][TC][Heat][App-Catalog][Murano][Tacker] Glare as a new Project

2016-08-09 Thread Steven Dake (stdake)
Well don't let me stop ya :) On 8/9/16, 7:21 AM, "Ian Cordasco" wrote: > > >-Original Message- >From: Steven Dake (stdake) >Reply: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > >Date: August

Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements] History lesson please

2016-08-09 Thread Matthew Thode
On 08/09/2016 09:25 AM, Ian Cordasco wrote: > > > -Original Message- > From: Sean Dague > Reply: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > > Date: August 9, 2016 at 05:44:55 > To:

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance][TC][Heat][App-Catalog][Murano][Tacker] Glare as a new Project

2016-08-09 Thread Ian Cordasco
  -Original Message- From: Steven Dake (stdake) Reply: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Date: August 6, 2016 at 07:48:01 To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)

Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements] History lesson please

2016-08-09 Thread Ian Cordasco
  -Original Message- From: Sean Dague Reply: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Date: August 9, 2016 at 05:44:55 To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Subject:  Re:

[openstack-dev] [new][nova] os_vif 1.1.0 release (newton)

2016-08-09 Thread no-reply
We are pleased to announce the release of: os_vif 1.1.0: A library for plugging and unplugging virtual interfaces in OpenStack. This release is part of the newton release series. With package available at: https://pypi.python.org/pypi/os_vif For more details, please see below. 1.1.0

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][nova][SR-IOV] deprecation of supported_pci_vendor_devs

2016-08-09 Thread Sergey Nikitin
+1 I think we have enough checks in Nova. 2016-08-09 12:46 GMT+03:00 Moshe Levi : > This is the deprecation patch [2] > > [2] - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/352812/ > > -Original Message- > From: Moshe Levi [mailto:mosh...@mellanox.com] > Sent: Monday, August

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] tripleo-common bugs, bug tracking and launchpad tags

2016-08-09 Thread Ryan Brady
On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 9:06 AM, Dougal Matthews wrote: > > > On 19 July 2016 at 16:20, Steven Hardy wrote: > >> On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 12:28:10PM +0100, Julie Pichon wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > On Friday Dougal mentioned on IRC that he hadn't realised there

Re: [openstack-dev] [octavia] Multi-node controller testing

2016-08-09 Thread Miguel Angel Ajo Pelayo
On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 4:56 PM, Kosnik, Lubosz wrote: > Great work with that multi-node setup Miguel. Thanks, I have to get my hands dirtier with octavia, it's just a tiny thing. > About that multinode Infra is supporting two nodes setup used currently by > grenade

Re: [openstack-dev] [octavia] Multi-node controller testing

2016-08-09 Thread Miguel Angel Ajo Pelayo
Thank you!! :) On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 5:49 PM, Michael Johnson wrote: > Miguel, > > Thank you for your work here. I would support an effort to setup a > multi-node gate job. > > Michael > > > On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 5:04 AM, Miguel Angel Ajo Pelayo >

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][networking-ovs-dpdk] conntrack security group driver with ovs-dpdk

2016-08-09 Thread Mooney, Sean K
> -Original Message- > From: kostiantyn.volenbovs...@swisscom.com > [mailto:kostiantyn.volenbovs...@swisscom.com] > Sent: Tuesday, August 9, 2016 12:58 PM > To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org; Mooney, Sean K > > Subject: RE: [openstack-dev]

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][networking-ovs-dpdk] conntrack security group driver with ovs-dpdk

2016-08-09 Thread Kostiantyn.Volenbovskyi
Hi, (sorry for using incorrect threading) > > About 2 weeks ago I did some light testing with the conntrack security > > group driver and the newly > > > > Merged upserspace conntrack support in ovs. > > By 'recently' - whether you mean patch v4

Re: [openstack-dev] [vitrage] spec for datasource

2016-08-09 Thread Yujun Zhang
Hi lfat, Thank you for the answers, please see my reply inline. On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 6:51 PM Afek, Ifat (Nokia - IL) wrote: > Hi Yujun, > > Please see my answers below. > > Best Regards, > Ifat. > > From: Yujun Zhang > Date: Tuesday, 9 August 2016 at 12:06 > > > For

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] devstack changed to neutron by default - merged

2016-08-09 Thread Ricardo Carrillo Cruz
Thanks a million for this! Ricky 2016-08-09 13:25 GMT+02:00 Davanum Srinivas : > Yay! Long time to get here. But we are here :) > > -- Dims > > On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 7:04 AM, Sean Dague wrote: > > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/350750/ has merged, which

Re: [openstack-dev] [vitrage] spec for datasource

2016-08-09 Thread Malin, Eylon (Nokia - IL)
Hi Yujun, Regards your questions : For example, let's say you have 2 packages for your datasources named : yujun.ds.snmp , yujun.ds.my_alerts 1. For proprietary datasources: a. You need that your datasource packages would be in the python path or installed in your python

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] devstack changed to neutron by default - merged

2016-08-09 Thread Davanum Srinivas
Yay! Long time to get here. But we are here :) -- Dims On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 7:04 AM, Sean Dague wrote: > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/350750/ has merged, which moves us over > to neutron by default in devstack. > > If you have manually set services in your local.conf, you

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] tripleo-common bugs, bug tracking and launchpad tags

2016-08-09 Thread Julie Pichon
Thank you for the replies on this thread and apologies for the delay, I didn't quite grasp what "this should be a policy" actually meant :-) On 18 July 2016 at 17:23, Ben Nemec wrote: > On 07/18/2016 06:28 AM, Julie Pichon wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On Friday Dougal mentioned on

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] devstack changed to neutron by default - merged

2016-08-09 Thread Sean Dague
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/350750/ has merged, which moves us over to neutron by default in devstack. If you have manually set services in your local.conf, you won't see any changes. If you don't regularly set those services, you'll be using neutron on your next stack.sh after this change.

Re: [openstack-dev] [vitrage] spec for datasource

2016-08-09 Thread Afek, Ifat (Nokia - IL)
Hi Yujun, Please see my answers below. Best Regards, Ifat. From: Yujun Zhang Date: Tuesday, 9 August 2016 at 12:06 For proprietary datasource, I'm considering to adapt the api to common protocol/interface, e.g. RESTful, SNMP and etc and I wish to know how to add support for these interface.

Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements] History lesson please

2016-08-09 Thread Sean Dague
On 08/09/2016 02:38 AM, Tony Breeds wrote: > Hi all, > I guess this is aimed at the long term requirements team members. > > The current policy for approving requirements[1] bumps contains the following > text: > > Changes to update the minimum version of a library developed by the >

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance][TC][Heat][App-Catalog][Murano][Tacker] Glare as a new Project

2016-08-09 Thread Kirill Zaitsev
 Undoubtedly, in the short term it will be painful, but I believe that in the long run Glare will win. Let’s hope that projects, that use Glare would also win from this decision. =) It seems to me, that murano is currently the only one that has been actively trying to incorporate glare into

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Patches for python-fuelclient are blocked by broken master.python-fuelclient.pkgs.ubuntu.review_fuel_client

2016-08-09 Thread Roman Prykhodchenko
Folks, It’s been several days when the entire python-fuelclient team is blocked by a broken CI job. Please make it non-voting ASAP. - romcheg > 8 серп. 2016 р. о 12:19 Roman Prykhodchenko написав(ла): > > Vladimir, > > Thanks you for the update on this. Is there any ETA

[openstack-dev] [smaug] voting for the project mascot

2016-08-09 Thread xiangxinyong
Hello guys, Smaug is voting for the project mascot. Please feel free to give your vote:) https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/smaugmascot Thanks very much. Best Regards, xiangxinyong__ OpenStack Development Mailing List

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][nova][SR-IOV] deprecation of supported_pci_vendor_devs

2016-08-09 Thread Moshe Levi
This is the deprecation patch [2] [2] - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/352812/ -Original Message- From: Moshe Levi [mailto:mosh...@mellanox.com] Sent: Monday, August 08, 2016 3:43 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) (openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org)

  1   2   >