Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] [nova] locking concern with os-brick

2016-08-13 Thread Clint Byrum
Excerpts from Joshua Harlow's message of 2016-08-13 20:04:13 -0700: > The larger issue here IMHO is that there is now a API > around locking that might be better suited targeting an actual lock > management system (say redis or zookeeper or etcd or ...). The more I look at this, the more I thin

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] [nova] locking concern with os-brick

2016-08-13 Thread Joshua Harlow
Sean McGinnis wrote: On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 05:55:47AM -0400, Sean Dague wrote: A devstack patch was pushed earlier this cycle around os-brick - https://review.openstack.org/341744 Apparently there are some os-brick operations that are only safe if the nova and cinder lock paths are set to be

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] [cinder] [nova] locking concern with os-brick

2016-08-13 Thread Jay Bryant
I have enough experience to know that the notes will not be read. I think we need to pull Walt and Kendall in and come up with a safer solution to this. That is my 2 cents. :-) Jay On Sat, Aug 13, 2016 at 5:07 PM Matt Riedemann wrote: > On 8/12/2016 8:54 AM, Matt Riedemann wrote: > > On 8/12/

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] [cinder] [nova] locking concern with os-brick

2016-08-13 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 8/12/2016 8:54 AM, Matt Riedemann wrote: On 8/12/2016 8:52 AM, Matt Riedemann wrote: On 8/12/2016 8:24 AM, Sean McGinnis wrote: On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 05:55:47AM -0400, Sean Dague wrote: A devstack patch was pushed earlier this cycle around os-brick - https://review.openstack.org/341744 A

Re: [openstack-dev] [Zun][Higgins] Proposing Sudipta Biswas and Wenzhi Yu for Zun core reviewer team

2016-08-13 Thread Fei Long Wang
+1 On 12/08/16 19:22, taget wrote: +1 for both, they would be great addition to zun team. On 2016年08月12日 10:26, Yanyan Hu wrote: Both Sudipta and Wenzhi have been actively contributing to the Zun project for a while. Sudipta provided helpful advice for the project roadmap and architecture

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][cinder] tag:follows-standard-deprecation should be removed

2016-08-13 Thread Duncan Thomas
There's so much misinformation in that email I barely know where to start. There is nothing stopping out of tree drivers for cinder, and a few have existed, though they don't seem to stick around. The driver is just a python class referenced in the config file. Turning a removed driver into an ou

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][tc][ptl] establishing project-wide goals

2016-08-13 Thread Doug Hellmann
Excerpts from John Dickinson's message of 2016-08-12 16:04:42 -0700: > > On 12 Aug 2016, at 13:31, Doug Hellmann wrote: > > > Excerpts from John Dickinson's message of 2016-08-12 13:02:59 -0700: > >> > >> On 12 Aug 2016, at 7:28, Doug Hellmann wrote: > >> > >>> Excerpts from John Dickinson's mess

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][tc][ptl] establishing project-wide goals

2016-08-13 Thread Clint Byrum
Excerpts from John Dickinson's message of 2016-08-12 13:02:59 -0700: > > On 12 Aug 2016, at 7:28, Doug Hellmann wrote: > > > Excerpts from John Dickinson's message of 2016-08-11 15:00:56 -0700: > >> > > > >> I agree with Hongbin Lu's comments that the resulting goals might fit > >> into the inter

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][cinder] tag:follows-standard-deprecation should be removed

2016-08-13 Thread Ihar Hrachyshka
Clay Gerrard wrote: The use_untested_probably_broken_deprecated_manger_so_maybe_i_can_migrate_cross_fingers option sounds good! The experiment would be then if it's still enough of a stick to keep 3rd party drivers pony'd up on their commitment to the Cinder team to consistently ship qu

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][lbaas][api]API returns incorrectly when filtering fields in every LBaaS resource

2016-08-13 Thread Ihar Hrachyshka
zhi wrote: hi, all. I have faced some strange problems when getting LBaaS resources, such as loadbalancers, listeners, pools, etc. For example, when I send a request which only filtering "id" attribute, like this: >>> curl -g -i -X GET http://10.0.44.233:9696/v2.0/lbaas/listeners