Re: [openstack-dev] [vitrage] relationship_type in static_datasources

2016-09-01 Thread Yujun Zhang
On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 2:44 AM Afek, Ifat (Nokia - IL) wrote: > I think you have a point. We can indeed use the templates definitions for > the static datasources as well. > If agreed by the team, I will get started to implement it. @all, please share your opinions. All

[openstack-dev] [openstack][neutron][stable/mitaka] Regarding lb_method required for creating pools

2016-09-01 Thread reedip banerjee
Hi There, The bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/heat/+bug/1616094 was created for Stable/Mitaka stating that lb_method is required for creating a pool. I just wanted to know, if it is possible to have a patch propagated to stable/mitaka for fixing this ? -- Thanks and Regards, Reedip Banerjee

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla] which footer format we need

2016-09-01 Thread Jeffrey Zhang
1. so i think we need add the deprecated status to the include_footer option and print a warn. 2. when the use specifies both two footers, they should both work rather than ignore one. it print warn already. On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 11:42 AM, Swapnil Kulkarni wrote: > On Fri,

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] new core reviewer (rderose)

2016-09-01 Thread De Rose, Ronald
Thank you so much! I really appreciate all of the warm wishes ☺ -Ron From: Steve Martinelli [mailto:s.martine...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, September 1, 2016 9:44 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: [openstack-dev]

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla] which footer format we need

2016-09-01 Thread Swapnil Kulkarni
On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 8:32 AM, Jeffrey Zhang wrote: > We introduced customization solution. > > Now, we support two format of footer. > > 1. the legacy way: {{ include_footer }} > 2. the new way: {% block footer %}{% endblock %} > > there two conflict about this

[openstack-dev] [release][diskimage-builder] v2 branch request

2016-09-01 Thread Ian Wienand
Hi, diskimage-builder would like to request a feature/v2 branch. We have a backlog of changes that we would like to give more extensive testing together before we merge to master [1]. We've discussed this in our meeting, and we feel like series-independent releases in general work well for us,

[openstack-dev] What's Up, Doc? 2 September

2016-09-01 Thread Lana Brindley
Hi everyone, We have five weeks left until the Newton release goes out, so this week has been all about getting started on testing the Install Guide. We now have beta releases for all our distros, so thanks to our lovely package maintainers for getting back to me so quickly! We can still use

Re: [openstack-dev] [tricircle]your proposal for the name of networking and gateway sub-projects

2016-09-01 Thread joehuang
I have some rough ideas about the name of gateway sub-project, for example, triangle, tridonut, tricookie etc, so that we can see that Tricircle and the new sub-project are like sibling in OpenStack. And they often will be listed closely in order. Your thoughts? Best Regards Chaoyi

[openstack-dev] [kolla] which footer format we need

2016-09-01 Thread Jeffrey Zhang
We introduced customization solution. Now, we support two format of footer. 1. the legacy way: {{ include_footer }} 2. the new way: {% block footer %}{% endblock %} there two conflict about this now[0][1]. I think the option 2 is better. We can get more consistent solution. [0]

[openstack-dev] How to set API Service cross domain when using javascript to invoke Rest API

2016-09-01 Thread xiangxinyong
Hi guys, when we are using ajax to invoke OpenStack Rest API, We get the error messages about the cross domain: Response to preflight request doesn't pass access control check: No 'Access-Control-Allow-Orgin' header is present on the requested resource. The response had HTTP status code 401.

[openstack-dev] [tricircle]your proposal for the name of networking and gateway sub-projects

2016-09-01 Thread joehuang
Hello, If we want to divide Tricircle into two sub-projects, your proposals for the name of sub-projects are welcome. Because the Tricircle is applying big-tent application, and the networking part will be remained in the Tricircle repository, and continue the big-tent application. So if we

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][massively distributed][architecture]Coordination between actions/WGs

2016-09-01 Thread joehuang
Hi, Adrien, +1, and the comment in the https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/massively-distributed_WG_description has been updated. - Security management over the WAN: how manage the inter-site communications and edge cloud securely. - Fault tolerant issues (each edge cloud should be able to

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] new core reviewer (rderose)

2016-09-01 Thread Chen, Wei D
Well deserved! Congrats! Best Regards, Dave Chen From: Steve Martinelli [mailto:s.martine...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, September 01, 2016 10:44 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: [openstack-dev] [keystone] new core reviewer (rderose) I want to

Re: [openstack-dev] [Congress] Enabling Remote Debugging

2016-09-01 Thread Eric K
Hi Aimee, Thanks for digging into it! Here¹s my understanding of our conventions (and I¹m happy to hear from others). a. If you think it¹s just a straightforward change with zero to minimal impact on architecture, users, and devs, then it makes sense to file a bug or just submit a patch. b. If

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][keystone] auth for new metadata plugins

2016-09-01 Thread Michael Still
On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 11:58 AM, Adam Young wrote: > On 08/31/2016 07:56 AM, Michael Still wrote: > > There is a quick sketch of what a service account might look like at > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/363606/ -- I need to do some more > fiddling to get the new option

[openstack-dev] [nova] Newton b3 tag is pushed up for review

2016-09-01 Thread Matt Riedemann
Booya! https://review.openstack.org/#/c/364600/ It's been a hectic week but a lot got done in the last few days of this release. Especially the focused effort on resource providers and cells v2 these last few days was awesome. 19 blueprints wrapped up in n-3:

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][networking-sfc] need help on requesting release for networking-sfc

2016-09-01 Thread Cathy Zhang
Hi Tim, Thank you for your response! From the statement, it does not seem to refer to a merged commit, which does not apply to our case. But you could be right. Anyway we will upload a patch for the release request and put down the git hash of the last commit which should be included in this

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][networking-sfc] need help on requesting release for networking-sfc

2016-09-01 Thread Cathy Zhang
Hi Mooney, Thank you for your response! I am still not quite sure about this. Anyway we will upload a patch for the release request and put down the git hash of the last commit which should be included in this Mitaka release. The Neutron release team will review it and let us know if there is

[openstack-dev] [nova] Move nova-python3-newton changes to goal-python35

2016-09-01 Thread Matt Riedemann
We're at feature freeze so this blueprint is closed for newton: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/nova-python3-newton I've created a blueprint for working on this in ocata: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/goal-python35 So if you have open changes please start moving them

[openstack-dev] [nova] Move remove-mox-newton changes to remove-mox-ocata

2016-09-01 Thread Matt Riedemann
I've closed the remove-mox-newton blueprint since today is feature freeze and we have two weeks to RC1 for newton. I've created a 'remove-mox-ocata' blueprint to continue this work, so if you have open changes for remove-mox-newton please re-targed those changes to the new blueprint. --

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Cutting milestone 3 deliverables

2016-09-01 Thread Armando M.
Neutrinos, Milestone 3 deliverables have been published [1]. Please, help us check the release notes to make sure everything in order and post patches to tidy up the release notes if needed. Some of these reminders are captured in [2], therefore please feel free to help. [3] captures a list of

[openstack-dev] [cinder] [nova] API interaction changes overview

2016-09-01 Thread Ildiko Vancsa
Hi All, As we skipped a few meetings and we also reached the N-3 milestone this week I would like to summarise where we are currently with our plans. At the beginning of the Newton cycle we decided to refactor the Cinder API around attach and detach to make Cinder more a standalone module and

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][networking-sfc] need help on requesting release for networking-sfc

2016-09-01 Thread Tim Rozet
Hi Cathy, I haven't done this in openstack before, but what I believe the statement is referring to is that you need to make sure you tag a merged commit, if the topic branch had diverged from master and had to be merged into your master trunk. For example: commit

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][massively distributed][architecture]Coordination between actions/WGs

2016-09-01 Thread Ian Wells
On 1 September 2016 at 06:52, Ken Giusti wrote: > On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 3:30 PM, Ian Wells wrote: > > > I have opinions about other patterns we could use, but I don't want to push > > my solutions here, I want to see if this is really as much of a

[openstack-dev] [Zun][Higgins] About container image

2016-09-01 Thread Hongbin Lu
Hi all, This is a continued discussion about the container image solution in Zun. Currently, when a user request to create a container (i.e. zun create --image ), the Zun compute agent will pull the image from docker hub or a private docker registry (depends on the image prefix). We are

[openstack-dev] [new][oslo] oslo.db 4.13.1 release (newton)

2016-09-01 Thread no-reply
We are tickled pink to announce the release of: oslo.db 4.13.1: Oslo Database library This release is part of the newton stable release series. With source available at: http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/oslo.db With package available at: https://pypi.python.org/pypi/oslo.db

Re: [openstack-dev] [Murano] FFE for dependency-driven multi-step resource deallocation

2016-09-01 Thread Kirill Zaitsev
Garbage collection bp addresses a very important piece of tech debt and is required for app framework to work correctly. Therefore I’m granting this one. ETA for code to be merged is next week. I've also updated topic link to 

Re: [openstack-dev] [puppet] Creating a Cloudkitty Puppet module

2016-09-01 Thread Andrew Woodward
Jinx! On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 12:09 PM Alex Schultz wrote: > On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 12:51 PM, Guillaume Espanel > wrote: > > Hi! > > > > At the moment, I don't think theres a Puppet module for > > the Cloudkitty rating service. I'd like

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][networking-sfc] need help on requesting release for networking-sfc

2016-09-01 Thread Mooney, Sean K
> -Original Message- > From: Cathy Zhang [mailto:cathy.h.zh...@huawei.com] > Sent: Thursday, September 1, 2016 8:03 PM > To: Ihar Hrachyshka ; Armando M. > ; Cathy Zhang > Cc: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for

[openstack-dev] [new][openstackclient] os-client-config 1.21.1 release (newton)

2016-09-01 Thread no-reply
We are pleased to announce the release of: os-client-config 1.21.1: OpenStack Client Configuation Library This release is part of the newton release series. With source available at: http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/os-client-config With package available at:

[openstack-dev] [new][neutron] python-neutronclient 6.0.0 release (newton)

2016-09-01 Thread no-reply
We are chuffed to announce the release of: python-neutronclient 6.0.0: CLI and Client Library for OpenStack Networking This release is part of the newton release series. With source available at: https://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/python-neutronclient With package available at:

Re: [openstack-dev] [puppet] Creating a Cloudkitty Puppet module

2016-09-01 Thread Emilien Macchi
Hi Guillaume, This is a great idea! We have a documentation for this process: http://docs.openstack.org/developer/puppet-openstack-guide/new-module.html You'll notice that we have a cookiecutter that will deploy the basic module for you and you'll be able to add the manifests to do deploy

Re: [openstack-dev] [puppet] Creating a Cloudkitty Puppet module

2016-09-01 Thread Iury Gregory
Hi Guillaume, You can find all information about how to start a new puppet-module in http://docs.openstack.org/developer/puppet-openstack-guide/new-module.html If you have any question please join us in #puppet-openstack on freenode. 2016-09-01 15:51 GMT-03:00 Guillaume Espanel <

Re: [openstack-dev] [puppet] Creating a Cloudkitty Puppet module

2016-09-01 Thread Alex Schultz
On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 12:51 PM, Guillaume Espanel wrote: > Hi! > > At the moment, I don't think theres a Puppet module for > the Cloudkitty rating service. I'd like to start the development > of this project. > > What are you thoughts on the matter? >

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][networking-sfc] need help on requesting release for networking-sfc

2016-09-01 Thread Cathy Zhang
Thanks for all your response. We would like to have the stable branch pulled from a git commit. Shall we use the git hash of that commit for the intended git hash in the release request? I am confused about the following statement in the release guide. "You need to be careful when picking a

[openstack-dev] [puppet] Creating a Cloudkitty Puppet module

2016-09-01 Thread Guillaume Espanel
Hi! At the moment, I don't think theres a Puppet module for the Cloudkitty rating service. I'd like to start the development of this project. What are you thoughts on the matter? -- Guillaume Espanel Objectif Libre www.objectif-libre.com Infrastructure et Formations Linux

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][networking-sfc] Unable to create openstack SFC

2016-09-01 Thread Cathy Zhang
Hi Vincent, Yes, there have been some code optimization and bug fixes going into the master branch. I am going to request the Mitaka release today after the patch for fixing the tempest version mismatch issue is merged. I would suggest that you use the Mitaka release. Thanks, Cathy From:

[openstack-dev] [Neutron] Cutting milestone 3 deliverables

2016-09-01 Thread Armando M.
Neutrinos, We are in the process of releasing the deliverables for Newton 3. This means we are in feature freeze and nothing should be approved for merging unless it is release critical, gate blocker, targeted for RC1[1] or has been granted a feature freeze exception [2] on the postmortem. For

[openstack-dev] [Congress] Enabling Remote Debugging

2016-09-01 Thread Aimee Ukasick
HI all - I've been trying to configure remote debugging with PyCharm and DevStack. It looks like some tiny modifications need to be made to the Congress code (3-4 files) to support remote debugging via pydevd. As far as I can tell, support has been added to Keystone, Glance, Nova, and Manilla

[openstack-dev] [neutron][networking-sfc] Unable to create openstack SFC

2016-09-01 Thread Alioune
Hi all, Thanks Vincent for this confimation. I've noticed that error to the team here [1]. I think it could be interesting to update the wiki in order to signal new comer the network requirements for building a chain. @ Cathy: I can create port chain but it just works once for me. After

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone][nova][neutron][all] Rolling upgrades: database triggers and oslo.versionedobjects

2016-09-01 Thread Michael Bayer
On Thursday, September 1, 2016, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > > I don't read that at all as suggesting "the problem is solved, go > away" but rather "help us make it better for everyone, don't just > take one project off in a new direction and leave the others > behind." I can

Re: [openstack-dev] [vitrage] relationship_type in static_datasources

2016-09-01 Thread Afek, Ifat (Nokia - IL)
I think you have a point. We can indeed use the templates definitions for the static datasources as well. BTW, I noticed we already have a blueprint for this issue: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/vitrage/+spec/add-direction-to-physical-topology-relationships, but nobody has handled it so far.

[openstack-dev] [new][congress] python-congressclient 1.5.0 release (newton)

2016-09-01 Thread no-reply
We are frolicsome to announce the release of: python-congressclient 1.5.0: Client for Congress This release is part of the newton release series. With source available at: http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/python-congressclient With package available at:

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone][nova][neutron][all] Rolling upgrades: database triggers and oslo.versionedobjects

2016-09-01 Thread Clint Byrum
Excerpts from Robert Collins's message of 2016-09-01 20:45:22 +1200: > On 31 August 2016 at 01:57, Clint Byrum wrote: > > > > > > It's simple, these are the holy SQL schema commandments: > > > > Don't delete columns, ignore them. > > Don't change columns, create new ones. > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone][nova][neutron][all] Rolling upgrades: database triggers and oslo.versionedobjects

2016-09-01 Thread Jeremy Stanley
On 2016-09-01 10:39:09 -0400 (-0400), Mike Bayer wrote: > On 08/31/2016 06:18 PM, Monty Taylor wrote: [...] > >OpenStack is One Project > > > > > > Nova and Neutron have an approach for this. It may or may not be > > ideal - but it exists right now. While it can be

[openstack-dev] [Fuel] Newton Feature Freeze

2016-09-01 Thread Vladimir Kozhukalov
Dear colleagues, I'd like to announce FF for Newton cycle. All features must be merged before 09/02/2016 12:00 AM PST. From this point all patches must refer to medium and higher bugs. If some feature patches are still in progress, please request FF exception for a respective feature. First such

[openstack-dev] [Tacker] Abstract interface for VNFC

2016-09-01 Thread bharath thiruveedula
Hi Tackers, As per this week meeting logs, regarding VNFC BP, I came to know that we need to add abstract interface which is invoked by infra_driver. But as we decided to go with SoftwareDeployment option in this cycle, most of the heat template changes are done by heat translator [1]. I

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone][nova][neutron][all] Rolling upgrades: database triggers and oslo.versionedobjects

2016-09-01 Thread Mike Bayer
On 09/01/2016 11:52 AM, Dan Smith wrote: The indirection service is really unrelated to this discussion, IMHO. If you take RPC out of the picture, all you have left is a direct-to-the-database facade to handle the fact that schema has expanded underneath you. As Clint (et al) have said --

Re: [openstack-dev] migrate_flavor_data doesn't flavor migrate meta data of VMs spawned during upgrade.

2016-09-01 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 9/1/2016 12:05 PM, Suresh Vinapamula wrote: On 8/31/2016 4:17 PM, Dan Smith wrote: Thanks Dan for your response. While I do run that before I start my move to liberty, what I see is that it doesn't seem to flavor migrate meta data for the VMs that are spawned after

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] new core reviewer (rderose)

2016-09-01 Thread Rodrigo Duarte
Thanks for the good work. Congrats, Ron! On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 12:21 PM, Adam Young wrote: > On 09/01/2016 10:44 AM, Steve Martinelli wrote: > > I want to welcome Ron De Rose (rderose) to the Keystone core team. In a > short time Ron has shown a very positive impact. Ron has

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Feature freeze exception for OVN

2016-09-01 Thread Russell Bryant
On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 11:51 AM, Steven Hardy wrote: > On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 07:53:07PM +0530, Babu Shanmugam wrote: > > Hi, > > > > The THT patch for OVN [1] has no more dependencies with the recent > merging > > of [2]. The changes in heat templates does not have any

Re: [openstack-dev] migrate_flavor_data doesn't flavor migrate meta data of VMs spawned during upgrade.

2016-09-01 Thread Suresh Vinapamula
On 8/31/2016 4:17 PM, Dan Smith wrote: Thanks Dan for your response. While I do run that before I start my move to liberty, what I see is that it doesn't seem to flavor migrate meta data for the VMs that are spawned after controller upgrade from juno to kilo and before all computes upgraded from

[openstack-dev] [kolla] Feature freeze until we tag rc1

2016-09-01 Thread Swapnil Kulkarni
Hello all, With the end of last development milestone newton-3, we will be having a procedural -2 on all features change requests to block merge until rc1 is tagged on September 15th. As a result of this, all changes related to blueprints not tagged for rc1 will have -2. The -2 here does not

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] Gerrit is blocking the workflow with -2 for reason

2016-09-01 Thread Hemanth Makkapati
Erno, Totally with you on not circumventing the process. I regret the fact that I had to resort to "side-stepping" your -2. But, please let's not look at this incident in isolation. We had to do it considering the circumstances that 1. You were unavailable to remove the -2 2. N-3 milestone is

[openstack-dev] [trove][release] Trove FFE's for Newton

2016-09-01 Thread Amrith Kumar
Between some late breaking complications in the gate (on stable branches, now understood and fixes are on the way to being merged) and a desire to have more jobs running in our CI, there are some feature patches that have not landed in N-3. This email is to document that list of feature

[openstack-dev] [all][api] POST /api-wg/news

2016-09-01 Thread Everett Toews
Subject: [all][api] POST /api-wg/news Greetings OpenStack community, Today we were joined by Scott DAngelo (scottda) who has graciously taken over the liaison role for Cinder as Alex Meade steps down. Thanks for stepping up Scott and welcome to the API WG! We also cleaned house today and

Re: [openstack-dev] Upstream - Barcelona

2016-09-01 Thread Adam Lawson
There are probably limited number of seats to participate in the session this cycle. opps = seats in my messed up way of thinking. //adam *Adam Lawson* AQORN, Inc. 427 North Tatnall Street Ste. 58461 Wilmington, Delaware 19801-2230 Toll-free: (844) 4-AQORN-NOW ext. 101 International: +1

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][massively distributed][architecture]Coordination between actions/WGs

2016-09-01 Thread Alec Hothan (ahothan)
This topic of oslo messaging issues has been going on for a long time and the main issue is not the transport itself (each transport has its own limitations) but the code using oslo messaging (e.g. pieces of almost every openstack service). It is relatively easy to write code using oslo

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone][nova][neutron][all] Rolling upgrades: database triggers and oslo.versionedobjects

2016-09-01 Thread Dan Smith
> So that is fine. However, correct me if I'm wrong but you're > proposing just that these projects migrate to also use a new service > layer with oslo.versionedobjects, because IIUC Nova/Neutron's > approach is dependent on that area of indirection being present. > Otherwise, if you meant

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Testing optional composable services in the CI

2016-09-01 Thread Emilien Macchi
On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 9:16 AM, Steven Hardy wrote: > On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 07:20:59AM -0400, James Slagle wrote: >> On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 4:04 AM, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: >> > However, the current gate system allows to run jobs based on files >> >

Re: [openstack-dev] [manila] [security] [tc] Add the vulnerability:managed tag to Manila

2016-09-01 Thread Ben Swartzlander
Thanks fungi. I misunderstood the full scope of the requirements for vulnerability management and since we don't yet have volunteers willing to perform all the required duties, I'm going to withdraw the tag request. As soon as interested community members step up to take on the

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] new core reviewer (rderose)

2016-09-01 Thread Adam Young
On 09/01/2016 10:44 AM, Steve Martinelli wrote: I want to welcome Ron De Rose (rderose) to the Keystone core team. In a short time Ron has shown a very positive impact. Ron has contributed feature work for shadowing LDAP and federated users, as well as enhancing password support for SQL users.

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] pymysql change in error formatting has broken exception handing in oslo.db

2016-09-01 Thread Diana Clarke
> upstream issue: > > https://github.com/PyMySQL/PyMySQL/issues/507 A fix for this was merged in pymysql 0.7.8. --diana __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe:

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] new core reviewer (rderose)

2016-09-01 Thread Samuel de Medeiros Queiroz
Ronald, congrats, well deserved! Welcome aboard! On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 11:56 AM, David Stanek wrote: > On Thu, Sep 01 at 10:44 -0400, Steve Martinelli wrote: > > > > Thanks for all your hard work Ron, we sincerely appreciate it. > > > > Contrats! Well deserved for sure! >

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone][nova][neutron][all] Rolling upgrades: database triggers and oslo.versionedobjects

2016-09-01 Thread Sean Dague
On 09/01/2016 09:45 AM, David Stanek wrote: > On Thu, Aug 25 at 13:13 -0400, Steve Martinelli wrote: >> The keystone team is pursuing a trigger-based approach to support rolling, >> zero-downtime upgrades. The proposed operator experience is documented here: >> >>

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone][nova][neutron][all] Rolling upgrades: database triggers and oslo.versionedobjects

2016-09-01 Thread Mike Bayer
On 09/01/2016 08:29 AM, Henry Nash wrote: From a purely keystone perspective, my gut feeling is that actually the trigger approach is likely to lead to a more robust, not less, solution - due to the fact that we solve the very specific problems of a given migration (i.e. need to keep column A

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] new core reviewer (rderose)

2016-09-01 Thread David Stanek
On Thu, Sep 01 at 10:44 -0400, Steve Martinelli wrote: > > Thanks for all your hard work Ron, we sincerely appreciate it. > Contrats! Well deserved for sure! -- David Stanek web: http://dstanek.com blog: http://traceback.org

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] new core reviewer (rderose)

2016-09-01 Thread Henry Nash
Welcome, Ron! Henry > On 1 Sep 2016, at 15:44, Steve Martinelli wrote: > > I want to welcome Ron De Rose (rderose) to the Keystone core team. In a short > time Ron has shown a very positive impact. Ron has contributed feature work > for shadowing LDAP and federated

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] new core reviewer (rderose)

2016-09-01 Thread Lance Bragstad
+1! He has been doing some great work. Welcome to the team, Ron! On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 9:44 AM, Steve Martinelli wrote: > I want to welcome Ron De Rose (rderose) to the Keystone core team. In a > short time Ron has shown a very positive impact. Ron has contributed >

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] new core reviewer (rderose)

2016-09-01 Thread Brant Knudson
On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 9:44 AM, Steve Martinelli wrote: > I want to welcome Ron De Rose (rderose) to the Keystone core team. In a > short time Ron has shown a very positive impact. Ron has contributed > feature work for shadowing LDAP and federated users, as well as

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone][nova][neutron][all] Rolling upgrades: database triggers and oslo.versionedobjects

2016-09-01 Thread Mike Bayer
On 08/31/2016 06:18 PM, Monty Taylor wrote: I said this the other day in the IRC channel, and I'm going to say it again here. I'm going to do it as bluntly as I can - please keeping in mind that I respect all of the humans involved. I think this is a monstrously terrible idea. There are

[openstack-dev] [keystone] new core reviewer (rderose)

2016-09-01 Thread Steve Martinelli
I want to welcome Ron De Rose (rderose) to the Keystone core team. In a short time Ron has shown a very positive impact. Ron has contributed feature work for shadowing LDAP and federated users, as well as enhancing password support for SQL users. Implementing these features and picking up various

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] Gerrit is blocking the workflow with -2 for reason

2016-09-01 Thread Brian Rosmaita
On 9/1/16, 7:31 AM, "Flavio Percoco" wrote: >On 01/09/16 08:50 +0100, Erno Kuvaja wrote: >>Hi all, >> >>As it seems by the "Improving help text for *" string of patches like >>[0][1] that the Glance core group is willing to get around -2s by >>abandoning, reproposing and

Re: [openstack-dev] what permission is required to create a Keystone trust

2016-09-01 Thread Alexander Makarov
Hi, Matt! The issue is most probably in the absence of roles being trusted, which are required to create a trust. On 01.09.2016 06:54, Matt Jia wrote: Hi, I am experimenting the Keystone Trusts feature with a script which creates a trust between two users. import keystoneclient.v3 as

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] cells v2 next steps

2016-09-01 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 8/31/2016 8:33 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: On 8/31/2016 1:44 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: Just to recap a call with Laski, Sean and Dan, the goal for the next 24 hours with cells v2 is to get this nova change landed: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/356138/ That depends on a set of grenade

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone][nova][neutron][all] Rolling upgrades: database triggers and oslo.versionedobjects

2016-09-01 Thread David Stanek
On Wed, Aug 31 at 17:18 -0500, Monty Taylor wrote: > > Nova and Neutron have an approach for this. It may or may not be ideal - > but it exists right now. While it can be satisfying to discount the > existing approach and write a new one, I do not believe that is in the > best interests of

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][massively distributed][architecture]Coordination between actions/WGs

2016-09-01 Thread Ken Giusti
On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 3:30 PM, Ian Wells wrote: > On 31 August 2016 at 10:12, Clint Byrum wrote: >> >> Excerpts from Duncan Thomas's message of 2016-08-31 12:42:23 +0300: >> > On 31 August 2016 at 11:57, Bogdan Dobrelya >> >

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone][nova][neutron][all] Rolling upgrades: database triggers and oslo.versionedobjects

2016-09-01 Thread David Stanek
On Thu, Aug 25 at 13:13 -0400, Steve Martinelli wrote: > The keystone team is pursuing a trigger-based approach to support rolling, > zero-downtime upgrades. The proposed operator experience is documented here: > > http://docs.openstack.org/developer/keystone/upgrading.html > I wanted to

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][massively distributed][architecture]Coordination between actions/WGs

2016-09-01 Thread Duncan Thomas
On 31 August 2016 at 22:30, Ian Wells wrote: > On 31 August 2016 at 10:12, Clint Byrum wrote: > >> Excerpts from Duncan Thomas's message of 2016-08-31 12:42:23 +0300: >> > Is there a writeup anywhere on what these issues are? I've heard this >> >

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][massively distributed][architecture]Coordination between actions/WGs

2016-09-01 Thread Ken Giusti
On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 6:02 PM, Clint Byrum wrote: > Excerpts from Ian Wells's message of 2016-08-31 12:30:45 -0700: >> On 31 August 2016 at 10:12, Clint Byrum wrote: >> >> > Excerpts from Duncan Thomas's message of 2016-08-31 12:42:23 +0300: >> > > On 31

[openstack-dev] [Murano] FFE for dependency-driven multi-step resource deallocation

2016-09-01 Thread Nikolay Starodubtsev
Hi all, I'd like to request a feature freeze exception for dependency-driven multi-step resource deallocation[0]. We've merged an initial commit for it [1] and a spec[2]. That's what we have on review [3]. The of patches on review is about bugs related to this feature, and only one add some new

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][massively distributed][architecture]Coordination between actions/WGs

2016-09-01 Thread Pablo Chacin
+1000 for this proposal. On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 2:47 PM, wrote: > May I suggest to open one (or more) thread(s) with the correct subject(s)? > > There are at least three points discussed here: > > - one related to the proposal of the Massively distributed group > - one

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][massively distributed][architecture]Coordination between actions/WGs

2016-09-01 Thread lebre . adrien
May I suggest to open one (or more) thread(s) with the correct subject(s)? There are at least three points discussed here: - one related to the proposal of the Massively distributed group - one related to the Architecture WG with the communication issue between services (RPC+Rabbit MQ, REST

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone][nova][neutron][all] Rolling upgrades: database triggers and oslo.versionedobjects

2016-09-01 Thread Henry Nash
So as the person who drove the rolling upgrade requirements into keystone in this cycle (because we have real customers that need it), and having first written the keystone upgrade process to be “versioned object ready” (because I assumed we would do this the same as everyone else), and

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-infra][all] Status update of the InfraCloud

2016-09-01 Thread Joshua Hesketh
This is awesome stuff. Thanks to all involved and to HPE for the hardware :-) On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 9:12 PM, Ricardo Carrillo Cruz < ricardo.carrillo.c...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi there > > We would like to write an update about the status of the InfraCloud ( if > you never heard of it, it's

Re: [openstack-dev] Upstream - Barcelona

2016-09-01 Thread Thierry Carrez
M Ranga Swami Reddy wrote: > yes...Even I have not seen any emails for upstream tasks @ > BarcelonaI guess we might have missed it... > > Thanks > Swami > > On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 9:23 AM, Adam Lawson > wrote: > > I seemed to have missed

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] FFE request for Ironic composable services

2016-09-01 Thread Dmitry Tantsur
On 08/30/2016 10:20 AM, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: Hi all! Bare metal provisioning is a hot topic right now. These services are also required for Dan's heat-driven undercloud work. The majority of changes has landed already, but there a few changes waiting on puppet-ironic changes. The feature is

[openstack-dev] [new][cinder] os-brick 1.6.1 release (newton)

2016-09-01 Thread no-reply
We are exuberant to announce the release of: os-brick 1.6.1: OpenStack Cinder brick library for managing local volume attaches This release is part of the newton stable release series. With source available at: http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/os-brick With package available at:

[openstack-dev] [murano][app-catalog] FFE request for dashboard reorg

2016-09-01 Thread Kirill Zaitsev
I would like to request an FFE for murano/appcatalog-dashboard-reorg  https://blueprints.launchpad.net/murano/+spec/catalog-dashboard-reorg A little back story: we’ve agreed to start merging murano-dashboard and app-catalog-ui under the same structure back in Austin. For app-catalog-ui the

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] Gerrit is blocking the workflow with -2 for reason

2016-09-01 Thread Flavio Percoco
On 01/09/16 08:50 +0100, Erno Kuvaja wrote: Hi all, As it seems by the "Improving help text for *" string of patches like [0][1] that the Glance core group is willing to get around -2s by abandoning, reproposing and merging just because not all of us are around in US office hours, I'd like to

[openstack-dev] [Murano] Changes in Core Library interface

2016-09-01 Thread Kostiantyn Snihyr
Hi folks, starting from the Newton release Murano supports multi-region applications deployment [1] and this feature required some changes in the Core Library design. Specifically after this patch references to all region-specific resources are held in the CloudRegion class instead of the

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][networking-sfc] need help on requesting release for networking-sfc

2016-09-01 Thread Ihar Hrachyshka
Armando M. wrote: On 31 August 2016 at 17:31, Cathy Zhang wrote: CC OpenStack alias. From: Cathy Zhang Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2016 5:19 PM To: Armando Migliaccio; Ihar Hrachyshka; Cathy Zhang Subject: need help on requesting release for

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] Gerrit is blocking the workflow with -2 for reason

2016-09-01 Thread Ian Cordasco
-Original Message- From: Erno Kuvaja Reply: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Date: September 1, 2016 at 02:51:42 To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)

[openstack-dev] [openstack-infra][all] Status update of the InfraCloud

2016-09-01 Thread Ricardo Carrillo Cruz
Hi there We would like to write an update about the status of the InfraCloud ( if you never heard of it, it's essentially a bunch of hardware donated by HPE to the project to run an OpenStack cloud for CI testing. More info at http://docs.openstack.org/infra/system-config/infra-cloud.html ). We

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][massively distributed][architecture]Coordination between actions/WGs

2016-09-01 Thread Thierry Carrez
Clint Byrum wrote: > [...] > I think it's about time we get some Architecture WG meetings started, > and put "Document RPC design" on the agenda. +1 Anything blocking you ? Let me know where/if I can help. -- Thierry Carrez (ttx)

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Getting rid of ISO

2016-09-01 Thread Roman Prykhodchenko
This is so awesome! Thanks! On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 4:30 PM Jay Pipes wrote: > On 08/16/2016 04:58 AM, Vladimir Kozhukalov wrote: > > Dear colleagues, > > > > We finally have working custom deployment job that deploys Fuel admin > > node using online RPM repositories (not

Re: [openstack-dev] Upstream - Barcelona

2016-09-01 Thread M Ranga Swami Reddy
yes...Even I have not seen any emails for upstream tasks @ BarcelonaI guess we might have missed it... Thanks Swami On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 9:23 AM, Adam Lawson wrote: > I seemed to have missed the thread where upstream opps we're being > announced and/or opened. Who do I

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla] Requirement for bug when reno is present

2016-09-01 Thread Paul Bourke
sdake kindly took the time to explain the release process. Logs are here: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/irclogs/%23openstack-kolla/%23openstack-kolla.2016-09-01.log.html#t2016-09-01T09:06:49 On 30/08/16 20:31, Christian Berendt wrote: On 30 Aug 2016, at 12:42, Paul Bourke

[openstack-dev] [TripleO] FFE: TLS everywhere in the overcloud

2016-09-01 Thread Juan Antonio Osorio
Hello, I've been working on TLS everywhere in the majority of this newton cycle. And proposed this blueprint https://review.openstack.org/#/c/282307/ (which has been approved in launchpad) somewhere around May. There has been a lot of work trying to tackle blockers and doing a lot of pre-work

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][massively distributed][architecture]Coordination between actions/WGs

2016-09-01 Thread joehuang
> What is the REST API for tricircle? > When looking at the github I see: > ''Documentation: TBD'' > Getting a feel for its REST API would really be helpful in determine how > much of a proxy/request router it is vs being an actual API. I don't > really want/like a proxy/request router (if that

  1   2   >