Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Latest news on placement API and Ocata rough goals

2016-09-23 Thread Alex Xu
2016-09-24 5:07 GMT+08:00 Sylvain Bauza : > > > Le 23/09/2016 18:41, Jay Pipes a écrit : > >> Hi Stackers, >> >> In Newton, we had a major goal of having Nova sending inventory and >> allocation records from the nova-compute daemon to the new placement API >> service over HTTP

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][cinder] Schedule Instances according to Local disk based Volume?

2016-09-23 Thread Zhenyu Zheng
Hi, Thanks all for the information, as for the filter Erlon( InstanceLocalityFilter) mentioned, this only solves a part of the problem, we can create new volumes for existing instances using this filter and then attach to it, but the root volume still cannot be guranteed to be on the same host as

Re: [openstack-dev] [security] [salt] Removal of Security and OpenStackSalt project teams from the Big Tent

2016-09-23 Thread Steven Dake (stdake)
+1! The security project adds tremendous value to OpenStack. Regards -steve From: Doug Hellmann Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" Date: Friday, September 23, 2016 at 10:35 AM To: openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][upgrades] Bi-weekly upgrades work status. 9/19/2016

2016-09-23 Thread Bhatia, Manjeet S
Added some more object patches for reviews > -Original Message- > From: Morales, Victor [mailto:victor.mora...@intel.com] > Sent: Friday, September 23, 2016 8:28 AM > To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org > Subject: [openstack-dev] [neutron][upgrades] Bi-weekly upgrades work status. >

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][stadium] Query regarding procedure for inclusion in Neutron Stadium

2016-09-23 Thread Armando M.
On 22 September 2016 at 22:36, Takashi Yamamoto wrote: > hi, > > On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 4:20 AM, Armando M. wrote: > > > > > > On 22 September 2016 at 00:46, reedip banerjee > wrote: > >> > >> Dear Neutron Core members, > >> > >> I

[openstack-dev] Devstack, Tempest, and TLS

2016-09-23 Thread Clark Boylan
Earlier this month there was a thread on replacing stud in devstack for the tls-proxy service [0]. Over the last week or so a bunch of work has happened around this so I figured I would send an update. Tempest passes against devstack with some edits to one of the object tests to properly handle

Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon] gate failures (fragile integrated tests)

2016-09-23 Thread Richard Jones
This seems to also be a connection issue to Firefox, but just in a different place: http://logs.openstack.org/69/375669/1/check/gate-horizon-dsvm-integration-deprecated-ubuntu-xenial/468d333/console.html#_2016-09-23_19_38_05_221999 Richard On 23 September 2016 at 22:18, Akihiro Motoki

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] newton rc-2 deadline

2016-09-23 Thread Timothy Symanczyk
https://bugs.launchpad.net/glance/+bug/1620833 Would be my suggestion for a conservative / quick-hit / high impact bug to consider for inclusion. Especially since this cycle is when the documentation for using db.simple was added, it seems like it¹d be nice if this were also fixed. Tim On

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Latest news on placement API and Ocata rough goals

2016-09-23 Thread Sylvain Bauza
Le 23/09/2016 18:41, Jay Pipes a écrit : Hi Stackers, In Newton, we had a major goal of having Nova sending inventory and allocation records from the nova-compute daemon to the new placement API service over HTTP (i.e. not RPC). I'm happy to say we achieved this goal. We had a stretch goal

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Fernet Key rotation

2016-09-23 Thread Adam Young
On 08/11/2016 06:25 AM, Steven Hardy wrote: On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 11:31:29AM -0400, Zane Bitter wrote: On 09/08/16 21:21, Adam Young wrote: On 08/09/2016 06:00 PM, Zane Bitter wrote: In either case a good mechanism might be to use a Heat Software Deployment via the Heat API directly (i.e.

Re: [openstack-dev] How people handle the ML (bring your patterns/best practices)

2016-09-23 Thread Doug Hellmann
Excerpts from Joshua Harlow's message of 2016-09-23 11:03:24 -0700: > Since I've heard this a few times over the years (the ML is to hard to > read, to much volume, to hard to keep track, to hard/this or that and > so-on), > > I thought it would make sense to start to document what folks that

[openstack-dev] [glance] newton rc-2 deadline

2016-09-23 Thread Brian Rosmaita
We're going to need to cut rc-2 for Glance to accommodate some new translations, so there is an opportunity to include some conservative bugfixes. Any such must be merged before 16:00 UTC on Wed 28 Sept, so I am setting a deadline of 12:00 UTC on Tue 27 Sept for approval. If you have a bugfix

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla][fuel][tripleo] Reference architecture to deploy OpenStack on k8s

2016-09-23 Thread Steven Dake (stdake)
Jay apologies. That was an overgeneralization. The fuel team was not part of the kolla-mesos team to my knowledge. To my knowledge the kolla-mesos team has moved on to kubernetes upstream work and isn’t all that involved in fuel work. Cheers -steve From: Jay Pipes

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla][fuel][tripleo] Reference architecture to deploy OpenStack on k8s

2016-09-23 Thread Fox, Kevin M
There's a bit of why documentation here (though somewhat dated now): https://review.openstack.org/#/c/361186/ And here: https://github.com/openstack/kolla-kubernetes/blob/master/specs/ansible-deployment.rst But there is still a bunch of stuff that we're still figuring out via the review

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla][fuel][tripleo] Reference architecture to deploy OpenStack on k8s

2016-09-23 Thread Jay Pipes
On 09/23/2016 01:04 PM, Steven Dake (stdake) wrote: I also fail to see how training the Fuel team with the choices Kolla has made in implementation puts OpenStack first. Sorry, could you elaborate on what exactly you mean above? What do you mean by "training the Fuel team with the choices

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] Testing config drive creation in our CI

2016-09-23 Thread Jim Rollenhagen
On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 7:37 AM, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: > Hi folks! > > We've found out that we're not testing creating of config drives in our CI. > It ended up in one combination being actually broken (pxe_* + wholedisk + > configdrive). I would like to cover this testing

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][cinder] Schedule Instances according to Local disk based Volume?

2016-09-23 Thread Erlon Cruz
Not sure exactly what you mean, but in Cinder using the InstanceLocalityFilter[1], you can schedule a volume to the same compute node the instance is located. Is this what you need? [1] http://docs.openstack.org/developer/cinder/scheduler-filters.html#instancelocalityfilter On Fri, Sep 23, 2016

[openstack-dev] How people handle the ML (bring your patterns/best practices)

2016-09-23 Thread Joshua Harlow
Since I've heard this a few times over the years (the ML is to hard to read, to much volume, to hard to keep track, to hard/this or that and so-on), I thought it would make sense to start to document what folks that have been able to keep track of the ML have been doing and perhaps we can

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla][fuel][tripleo] Reference architecture to deploy OpenStack on k8s

2016-09-23 Thread Steven Dake (stdake)
Flavio, Forgive the top post and lack of responding inline – I am dealing with lookout 2016 which apparently has a bug here [0]. Your question: I can contribute to kolla-kubernetes all you want but that won't give me what I asked for in my original email and I'm pretty sure there are opinions

[openstack-dev] [oslo] Ocata summit planning (reminder!)

2016-09-23 Thread Joshua Harlow
Just a reminder for any folks interested in oslo and the summit, I'd be great to have any or or other ideas on: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/ocata-oslo-summit-planning So just wanted to make sure people are aware of that URL/etherpad and have been thinking about what to add to it (I

Re: [openstack-dev] [security] [salt] Removal of Security and OpenStackSalt project teams from the Big Tent

2016-09-23 Thread Mike Perez
On 11:03 Sep 21, Doug Hellmann wrote: > > > On Sep 21, 2016, at 8:58 AM, Filip Pytloun > > wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > it's definately our bad that we missed elections in OpenStackSalt > > project. Reason is similar to Rob's - we are active on different > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [security] [salt] Removal of Security and OpenStackSalt project teams from the Big Tent

2016-09-23 Thread Doug Hellmann
Excerpts from Rob C's message of 2016-09-23 17:46:46 +0100: > I wanted to provide a quick update from Security. > > We had our weekly IRC meeting yesterday, dhellman was kind enough to attend > to help broker some of the discussion. In advance of the meeting I prepared > a blog post where I tried

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Proposal for Nova Integration tests

2016-09-23 Thread Prasanth Anbalagan
Adding the project to email subject. Thanks Prasanth Anbalagan On Fri, 2016-09-23 at 12:56 -0400, Prasanth Anbalagan wrote: > Hi, > > Continuing the topic on the need for integration style tests for Nova > (brought up earlier during the weekly meeting at #openstack-meeting, > Sep 22). The

Re: [openstack-dev] [security] [salt] Removal of Security and OpenStackSalt project teams from the Big Tent

2016-09-23 Thread Mike Perez
On 13:17 Sep 21, Rob C wrote: > For my part, I missed the elections, that's my bad. I normally put a > calendar item in for that issue. I don't think that my missing the election > date should result in the group being treated in this way. Members of the > TC have contacted me about unrelated

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla][fuel][tripleo] Reference architecture to deploy OpenStack on k8s

2016-09-23 Thread Steven Dake (stdake)
Bogdan, I recognize English isn’t your first language, so forgive me if I have mis-parsed your message. I think the question you are asking is “Can we have cooperation to standardize on how best to do OpenStack on Kubernetes”. We tried an analog of that with Mirantis around Mesos, and that

[openstack-dev] Proposal for Nova Integration tests

2016-09-23 Thread Prasanth Anbalagan
Hi, Continuing the topic on the need for integration style tests for Nova (brought up earlier during the weekly meeting at #openstack-meeting, Sep 22). The proposal is for a project to hold integration tests that includes low-level testing and runs against a devstack backend. I have included more

Re: [openstack-dev] [security] [salt] Removal of Security and OpenStackSalt project teams from the Big Tent

2016-09-23 Thread Rob C
I wanted to provide a quick update from Security. We had our weekly IRC meeting yesterday, dhellman was kind enough to attend to help broker some of the discussion. In advance of the meeting I prepared a blog post where I tried to articulate my position and where I think things need to go next

[openstack-dev] [nova] Latest news on placement API and Ocata rough goals

2016-09-23 Thread Jay Pipes
Hi Stackers, In Newton, we had a major goal of having Nova sending inventory and allocation records from the nova-compute daemon to the new placement API service over HTTP (i.e. not RPC). I'm happy to say we achieved this goal. We had a stretch goal from the mid-cycle of implementing the

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] Cores using -2 votes

2016-09-23 Thread Nikhil Komawar
I empathize with you Erno. I think this is a case of sheer mis-understanding and probably (I think) the mention of that instance / situation in this email is only for referential purposes. There are some critical deadlines one sub-set of people have to met and there are other priorities other

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] Cores using -2 votes

2016-09-23 Thread Ian Cordasco
  -Original Message- From: Erno Kuvaja Reply: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Date: September 23, 2016 at 11:33:46 To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] Cores using -2 votes

2016-09-23 Thread Ian Cordasco
  -Original Message- From: Bashmakov, Alexander Reply: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Date: September 23, 2016 at 11:08:55 To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla][fuel][tripleo] Reference architecture to deploy OpenStack on k8s

2016-09-23 Thread Ryan Hallisey
Thanks for starting the discussion Fabio. > As someone that started looking into this topic just recently, I'd love to see > our communities collaborate more wherever possible. For example, it'd be great > to see us working on a reference architecture for deploying OpenStack on > kubernetes,

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] Cores using -2 votes

2016-09-23 Thread Erno Kuvaja
On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 3:42 PM, Ian Cordasco wrote: > Hi all, > > A few weeks ago, there was a controversy in which a patch had been > -2'd until other concerns were resolved and then the core who used > their -2 powers disappeared and could not lift it after those

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] Cores using -2 votes

2016-09-23 Thread Bashmakov, Alexander
These queries might be a good addition to the Glance dashboard in https://github.com/openstack/gerrit-dash-creator under the "Patches I -2'd" section: https://github.com/openstack/gerrit-dash-creator/blob/master/dashboards/glance.dash#L33 > -Original Message- > From: Ian Cordasco

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla][fuel][tripleo] Reference architecture to deploy OpenStack on k8s

2016-09-23 Thread Joshua Harlow
Flavio Percoco wrote: Greetings, I've recently started looking into the container technologies around OpenStack. More specifically, I've been looking into the tools that allow for deploying OpenStack on containers, which is what I'm the most interested in right now as part of the TripleO

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla][fuel][tripleo] Reference architecture to deploy OpenStack on k8s

2016-09-23 Thread Bogdan Dobrelya
Yeah, would be very nice to have/reuse a place for highest level and projects independent specs to outline key architecture decisions like (WARN [tl;dr]: biased examples from a non existent prototype go below): * Shared nothing for stateful DB/MQ components (this means no shared storage for state

[openstack-dev] [neutron][upgrades] Bi-weekly upgrades work status. 9/19/2016

2016-09-23 Thread Morales, Victor
Hi neutrinos, The idea of this email is to summarize the effort that we're making during the implemetation of Rolling upgrades in Neutron, as well as sharing the upcoming changes. Announcements Neutron Newton RC1 has been created and this contains the following changes related

[openstack-dev] [release][trove] trove and trove-dashboard Newton RC2 available

2016-09-23 Thread Doug Hellmann
Hello everyone, The release candidates for trove and trove-dashboard for the end of the Newton cycle is available! You can find the RC2 source code tarballs at: https://tarballs.openstack.org/trove/trove-6.0.0.0rc2.tar.gz

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] TripleO Core nominations

2016-09-23 Thread Dan Prince
On Thu, 2016-09-15 at 10:20 +0100, Steven Hardy wrote: > Hi all, > > As we work to finish the last remaining tasks for Newton, it's a good > time > to look back over the cycle, and recognize the excellent work done by > several new contributors. > > We've seen a different contributor pattern

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][cinder] Schedule Instances according to Local disk based Volume?

2016-09-23 Thread Jay S. Bryant
Kevin, This is functionality that has been requested in the past but has never been implemented. The best way to proceed would likely be to propose a blueprint/spec for this and start working this through that. -Jay On 09/23/2016 02:51 AM, Zhenyu Zheng wrote: Hi Novaers and Cinders:

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] Cores using -2 votes

2016-09-23 Thread Ian Cordasco
  -Original Message- From: Nikhil Komawar Reply: Nikhil Komawar Date: September 23, 2016 at 10:04:51 To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Cc: Ian Cordasco

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] Cores using -2 votes

2016-09-23 Thread Nikhil Komawar
thanks Ian, this is great info. Just a side question, do you have example for -Workflow , say in cases when I'd +2ed but to keep a check on process and approve after the freeze -W'ed it? Nonetheless, I have been using the labels and owner/reviewer/project field to good advantage so would like to

[openstack-dev] [nova][scheduler] Next scheduler subteam meeting

2016-09-23 Thread Ed Leafe
The next meeting of the Nova scheduler subteam will be on Monday, September 26 at 1400 UTC in #openstack-meeting-alt http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?iso=20160926T14 The agenda is here: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/NovaScheduler Please add any issues you

[openstack-dev] [Glance] Cores using -2 votes

2016-09-23 Thread Ian Cordasco
Hi all, A few weeks ago, there was a controversy in which a patch had been -2'd until other concerns were resolved and then the core who used their -2 powers disappeared and could not lift it after those concerns had been resolved. This lead to a situation where the -2'd patch was abandoned and

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Ocata Design Summit - Proposed slot allocation

2016-09-23 Thread Thierry Carrez
e...@itsonlyme.name wrote: > Also if you don't plan to use all of your >> allocated slots, let us know so that we can propose them to other teams. >> > Just so that we are not forgotten (in case there is some space left), > the storlets dev team would greatly appreciate 2fb and 2-3wr. Would you

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][summit][kolla] Returning one workroom session to the foundation

2016-09-23 Thread Thierry Carrez
Steven Dake (stdake) wrote: > [...] > The session we would like to return to the foundation is the *_Kolla > Workroom Session Wednesday 3:05-3:45 session_*. We have no conflicts in > this time slot and aren’t returning it as a result of some conflict in > the core team’s schedule that I am aware

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][nova] Centralizing policy (was: Anyone interested in writing a policy generator sphinx extension?)

2016-09-23 Thread Andrew Laski
On Thu, Sep 22, 2016, at 01:34 PM, Alexander Makarov wrote: > Andrew, > > the idea is to shift existing RBAC implementation: > currently policy is enforced in the service (Nova, for instance) > against the result of token validation, which is, in general, an access > check; > I'm thinking

Re: [openstack-dev] [AODH] event-alarm timeout discussion

2016-09-23 Thread gordon chung
On 23/09/2016 2:18 AM, Zhai, Edwin wrote: > > There are many targets(topics)/endpoints in above ceilometer code. But > in AODH, we just have one topic, 'alarm.all', and one endpoint. If it is > still multi-threaded, there is already potential race condition here, > but event-alarm tiemout make

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] Testing config drive creation in our CI

2016-09-23 Thread Vladyslav Drok
This makes sense to me. Another approach is here - https://review.openstack.org/375467 Thanks, Vlad On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 2:37 PM, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: > Hi folks! > > We've found out that we're not testing creating of config drives in our > CI. It ended up in one

Re: [openstack-dev] [AODH] event-alarm timeout discussion

2016-09-23 Thread gordon chung
On 23/09/2016 3:19 AM, Zhai, Edwin wrote: > "Each notification listener is associated with an executor which > controls how incoming notification messages will be received and > dispatched. By default, the most simple executor is used - the blocking > executor. This executor processes inbound

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Can all virt drivers provide a disk 'id' for the diagnostics API?

2016-09-23 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 07:32:36AM -0500, Matt Riedemann wrote: > On 9/23/2016 3:54 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 01:54:21PM -0500, Matt Riedemann wrote: > > > Sergey is working on a spec to use the standardized virt driver instance > > > diagnostics in the

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Can all virt drivers provide a disk 'id' for the diagnostics API?

2016-09-23 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 9/23/2016 3:54 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 01:54:21PM -0500, Matt Riedemann wrote: Sergey is working on a spec to use the standardized virt driver instance diagnostics in the os-diagnostics API. A question came up during review of the spec about how to define a disk

Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon] gate failures (fragile integrated tests)

2016-09-23 Thread Akihiro Motoki
Hi horizoners, As you may have noticed, the main fixes have been merged and the horizon gate failure rate seems to be recovered. There are still some remaining issues around the integration tests, but top failure rate problems now have been fixed or have a workaround. Thanks for your patience.

[openstack-dev] [Massively Distributed] Working sessions in Barcelona

2016-09-23 Thread lebre . adrien
Dear all The Massively Distributed Cloud Working Group [1] will meet on Thursday morning during the next summit in Barcelona. We have three slots. The current proposal is to discuss distributed clouds/Fog/Edge use-cases and requirements during the two first ones and to use the last one to

[openstack-dev] [ironic] Testing config drive creation in our CI

2016-09-23 Thread Dmitry Tantsur
Hi folks! We've found out that we're not testing creating of config drives in our CI. It ended up in one combination being actually broken (pxe_* + wholedisk + configdrive). I would like to cover this testing gap. Is there any benefit in NOT using config drives in all jobs? I assume we should

Re: [openstack-dev] [Security] Picking a new tag

2016-09-23 Thread Rob C
I agree that sometimes simply filtering for "security" can get a bit noisy because only very occasionally is an email mentioning it or even using the [security] tag actually trying to get the attention of the OSSP. Most of the time (from my filters anyway) it's either a Neutron Security Groups

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla][fuel][tripleo] Reference architecture to deploy OpenStack on k8s

2016-09-23 Thread Flavio Percoco
On 22/09/16 10:49 -0500, Michał Jastrzębski wrote: So issue is, I know of few other openstacks on k8s and everyone does that slightly differently. So far we lack proof points and real world data to determine best approaches to stuff. This is still not-to-well researched field. Right now it's

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla][fuel][tripleo] Reference architecture to deploy OpenStack on k8s

2016-09-23 Thread Flavio Percoco
On 22/09/16 20:55 +, Steven Dake (stdake) wrote: Flavio, Apologies for delay in response – my backlog is large. Forgive me if I parsed your message incorrectly. It's probably me failing to communicate my intent or just the intent not being good enough or worth it at all. It came across

Re: [openstack-dev] [vote][kolla] deprecation for fedora distro support

2016-09-23 Thread Haïkel
2016-09-21 16:34 GMT+02:00 Steven Dake (stdake) : > > > > On 9/20/16, 11:18 AM, "Haïkel" wrote: > > 2016-09-19 19:40 GMT+02:00 Jeffrey Zhang : > > Kolla core reviewer team, > > > > Kolla supports multiple Linux

Re: [openstack-dev] What is definition of critical bugfixes?

2016-09-23 Thread Rikimaru Honjo
On 2016/09/20 23:42, Matt Riedemann wrote: On 9/20/2016 4:25 AM, Rikimaru Honjo wrote: Hi All, I requested to review my patch in the last Weekly Nova team meeting.[1] In this meeting, Mr. Dan Smith said following things about my patch. * This patch is too large to merge in rc2.[2] * Fix after

[openstack-dev] Fwd: [neutron][lbaas][barbican] Listener create fails

2016-09-23 Thread Jayanthi Jeyakumar
-- Forwarded message -- From: Date: Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 11:50 AM Subject: [neutron][lbaas][barbican] Listener create fails To: jeyakumar@gmail.com You have to be a subscriber to post to this mailing list, so your message has been

[openstack-dev] [daisycloud-core] Meeting minutes for IRC meeting 0800UTC Sep. 23 2016

2016-09-23 Thread hu . zhijiang
Minutes: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/daisycloud/2016/daisycloud.2016-09-23-07.59.html Minutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/daisycloud/2016/daisycloud.2016-09-23-07.59.txt Log:

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Can all virt drivers provide a disk 'id' for the diagnostics API?

2016-09-23 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 01:54:21PM -0500, Matt Riedemann wrote: > Sergey is working on a spec to use the standardized virt driver instance > diagnostics in the os-diagnostics API. A question came up during review of > the spec about how to define a disk 'id': > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [vote][kolla] deprecation for debian distro support

2016-09-23 Thread Christian Berendt
> On 22 Sep 2016, at 17:16, Ryan Hallisey wrote: > > I agree with Michal and Martin. I was a little reluctant to respond here > because the Debian additions are new, while Fedora has been around since the > beginning and never got a ton of testing. > > Berendt what's your

[openstack-dev] [nova][cinder] Schedule Instances according to Local disk based Volume?

2016-09-23 Thread Zhenyu Zheng
Hi Novaers and Cinders: Quite often application requirements would demand using locally attached disks (or direct attached disks) for OpenStack compute instances. One such example is running virtual hadoop clusters via OpenStack. We can now achieve this by using BlockDeviceDriver as Cinder

Re: [openstack-dev] [AODH] event-alarm timeout discussion

2016-09-23 Thread Zhai, Edwin
Just check oslo messaging doc, don't know if it's out of date. "Each notification listener is associated with an executor which controls how incoming notification messages will be received and dispatched. By default, the most simple executor is used - the blocking executor. This executor

Re: [openstack-dev] [AODH] event-alarm timeout discussion

2016-09-23 Thread Zhai, Edwin
Thanks for your clarification, see my comments below. On Thu, 22 Sep 2016, gordon chung wrote: On 22/09/2016 2:40 AM, Zhai, Edwin wrote: See https://github.com/openstack/aodh/blob/master/aodh/evaluator/event.py#L158 evaluate_events is the handler of the endpoint for 'alarm.all', it

Re: [openstack-dev] [Security] Picking a new tag

2016-09-23 Thread Tony Breeds
On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 12:12:53AM +, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > It actually is, but Mailman (unhelpfully) lists tags by their long > descriptions. Go ahead and click on the Details link next to the > Cross-project coordination topic and you'll see that's actually the > name for the [all] tag.