[openstack-dev] [Neutron] Driver meeting cancelled for Thur Sept 29

2016-09-28 Thread Armando M.
__ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

[openstack-dev] Deprecation Policies (related to Heka)

2016-09-28 Thread Steven Dake (stdake)
First off, apologies for missing most of the team meeting today. I have read through the logs and saw a discussion about deprecating heka. We need to ensure that we follow the deprecation policy. My understanding of the deprecation policy is as follows (in a nutshell): 1. We must

Re: [openstack-dev] [Keystone] Project name DB length

2016-09-28 Thread Adrian Turjak
I think with PKI tokens we had worse to worry about! At any rate, would be great to know, and if there isn't a strong reason against it we can make project name 255 for some more flexibility. Plus although there is no true official standard, most projects in OpenStack seem to use 255 as the

Re: [openstack-dev] [Keystone] Project name DB length

2016-09-28 Thread Steve Martinelli
We may have to ask Adam or Dolph, or pull out the history textbook for this one. I imagine that trying to not bloat the token was definitely a concern. IIRC User name was 64 also, but we had to increase to 255 because we're not in control of name that comes from external sources (like LDAP). On

[openstack-dev] [Keystone] Project name DB length

2016-09-28 Thread Adrian Turjak
Hello Keystone Devs, Just curious as to the choice to have the project name be only 64 characters: https://github.com/openstack/keystone/blob/master/keystone/resource/backends/sql.py#L241 Seems short, and an odd choice when the user.name field is 255 characters:

[openstack-dev] [trio2o]Trio2o cleaning discussion

2016-09-28 Thread joehuang
Hello, As we discussed yesterday, we'll have a short conversation on the Trio2o cleaning. Let's discuss Trio2o cleaning on Friday UTC2:00(i.e, beijing time 10:00), 1 hour It would be better to discuss this in the channel of #openstack-trio2o instead of #openstack-tricircle(sorry mentioned

[openstack-dev] SRIOV-port refused to bind

2016-09-28 Thread Murali B
Hi I am using the SRIOV on mitaka. When I try to launch the VM with SRIOV port its failed. When I see the neutrn-server.log I see that below message on controller. ddf81 - - -] Refusing to bind due to unsupported vnic_type: direct bind_port

Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Fedora Atomic image that supports kubernetes external load balancer (for stable/mitaka)

2016-09-28 Thread Hongbin Lu
Steve, In Newton, we upgraded the Heat templates to use lbaasv2 [1]. However, it seems the k8s external load balancer still work with lbaasv1. If Kolla doesn't use the external load balancer feature, it should be fine. [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/314060/ Best regards, Hongbin On Wed,

[openstack-dev] [infra]please help to add initial members to trio2o-core and trio2o-release group

2016-09-28 Thread joehuang
Hello, Trio2o is a new project which is derived from Tricircle: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/367114/ Please add the initial members (same as that in Tricircle) to the group trio2o-core (https://review.openstack.org/#/admin/groups/1576,members) and trio2o-release

[openstack-dev] [tricircle]tricircle cleaning plan

2016-09-28 Thread joehuang
Hello, The Newton branch will be created tomorrow, we can start the Tricircle cleaning in the trunk to make Tricircle dedicated for networking automation. At the same time Tricircle Newton release will be done in the Newton branch, two more patches needed for this branch: one patch to update

[openstack-dev] [release][Cinder] Cinder Newton RC2 available

2016-09-28 Thread Davanum Srinivas
Hello everyone, A new release candidate for Cinder for the end of the Newton cycle is available! You can find the source code tarball at: https://tarballs.openstack.org/cinder/cinder-9.0.0.0rc2.tar.gz Unless release-critical issues are found that warrant a release candidate respin, this

Re: [openstack-dev] [Security] XML Attacks and DefusedXML on Global Requirements

2016-09-28 Thread Charles Neill
A completely secure alternative isn't available in the Python standard library. Here's a table of various XML libraries and the vulnerabilities they may be affected by [1]. This is partially reflected in Python's official documentation as well (version 2.7.12) [2]. There are currently 132

Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Fedora Atomic image that supports kubernetes external load balancer (for stable/mitaka)

2016-09-28 Thread Steven Dake (stdake)
Fantastic! Quick semi-related question. Will Magnum Newton be using lbaasv2? That is what we have implemented in Kolla. Regards -steve From: Ton Ngo Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" Date: Tuesday,

Re: [openstack-dev] Devstack, Tempest, and TLS

2016-09-28 Thread Clark Boylan
On Tue, Sep 27, 2016, at 02:58 PM, Clark Boylan wrote: > Once multinode testing has tls-proxy enabled the next thing I think we > should be talking about is enabling this by default in devstack. As > mentioned before ironic doesn't work due to IPA images not trusting > glance's cert. Swift's

[openstack-dev] [release][glance] glance Newton RC2 available

2016-09-28 Thread Doug Hellmann
Hello everyone, A new release candidate for glance for the end of the Newton cycle is available! You can find the source code tarball at: https://tarballs.openstack.org/glance/glance-13.0.0.0rc2.tar.gz Unless release-critical issues are found that warrant a release candidate respin, this

[openstack-dev] [ironic] Petitboot and PXE

2016-09-28 Thread Michael Turek
Hey ironic-ers, My team has a patch [1] up for enabling PXE for petitboot [2]. It's been around for awhile, and we actually use it in our PowerKVM CI ironic job (as our OpenPOWER target boxes run petitboot). I was hoping to get some eyes on it as we'd like to eventually get it upstream. I've

Re: [openstack-dev] TC candidacy

2016-09-28 Thread gordon chung
On 28/09/2016 4:27 PM, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > As was pointed out elsewhere in the thread, the TC has been trying > to do something along these lines at > http://www.openstack.org/blog/category/technical-committee-updates/ > but even with a dedicated communication subteam (see the May 13, > 2015

Re: [openstack-dev] TC candidacy

2016-09-28 Thread gordon chung
On 28/09/2016 3:59 PM, Chris Dent wrote: > On Wed, 28 Sep 2016, Jim Rollenhagen wrote: > >> And the git tree, with a changelog, is here: >> http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/governance/ > > I assume, but I'd prefer if he confirm, that the point gordc was > trying to make was that there's

Re: [openstack-dev] TC candidacy

2016-09-28 Thread Jeremy Stanley
On 2016-09-28 20:59:09 +0100 (+0100), Chris Dent wrote: > Part of the point I was trying to make in the message to which gordc was > responding is that whereas a git tree can allow someone to dig through > and acquire details, a thing that is more like release notes[1] is far > more human oriented

Re: [openstack-dev] TC candidacy

2016-09-28 Thread Doug Wiegley
> On Sep 28, 2016, at 1:59 PM, Chris Dent wrote: > > On Wed, 28 Sep 2016, Jim Rollenhagen wrote: > +1 to release notes or something of that like. i was asked to give an update on the TC internally and it seems the only information out there is to read

Re: [openstack-dev] TC candidacy

2016-09-28 Thread Chris Dent
On Wed, 28 Sep 2016, Jim Rollenhagen wrote: +1 to release notes or something of that like. i was asked to give an update on the TC internally and it seems the only information out there is to read through backlog of meeting logs or track the items that do get raised to ML. even then, it's hard

[openstack-dev] [release][freezer] freezer Newton RC2 available

2016-09-28 Thread Doug Hellmann
Hello everyone, A new release candidate for freezer for the end of the Newton cycle is available! You can find the source code tarball at: https://tarballs.openstack.org/freezer/freezer-3.0.0.0rc2.tar.gz Unless release-critical issues are found that warrant a release candidate respin, these

Re: [openstack-dev] TC candidacy

2016-09-28 Thread Jim Rollenhagen
>> +1 to release notes or something of that like. i was asked to give an >> update on the TC internally and it seems the only information out there >> is to read through backlog of meeting logs or track the items that do >> get raised to ML. even then, it's hard to define what deliverables were >>

[openstack-dev] [release][murano] murano Newton RC2 available

2016-09-28 Thread Doug Hellmann
Hello everyone, A new release candidate for murano for the end of the Newton cycle is available! You can find the source code tarballs at: https://tarballs.openstack.org/murano/murano-3.0.0.0rc2.tar.gz https://tarballs.openstack.org/murano-agent/murano-agent-3.0.0.0rc2.tar.gz

Re: [openstack-dev] TC candidacy

2016-09-28 Thread Steve Martinelli
On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 2:49 PM, gordon chung wrote: > > > On 28/09/2016 12:41 PM, Chris Dent wrote: > > > > * Information is not always clear nor clearly available, despite > > valiant efforts to maintain a transparent environment for the > > discussion of policy and process.

[openstack-dev] [horizon][keystone] retiring python-keystoneclient-kerberos

2016-09-28 Thread Steve Martinelli
Hi there, I would like to retire the python-keystoneclient-kerberos repo [1]. The repo was pretty basic, it had a single auth plugin. The logic has since been copied over to keystoneauth1 and provided you have kerberos libraries installed the plugin will be available to you. The last release of

Re: [openstack-dev] TC candidacy

2016-09-28 Thread gordon chung
On 28/09/2016 12:41 PM, Chris Dent wrote: > > * Information is not always clear nor clearly available, despite > valiant efforts to maintain a transparent environment for the > discussion of policy and process. There is more that can be done > to improve engagement and communication. Maybe

Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon] Integration Tests Status

2016-09-28 Thread Rob Cresswell
Integration tests are now non-voting, so feel free to recheck failing builds. Rob On 28 September 2016 at 14:23, Rob Cresswell > wrote: Hi all, So the integration tests have started failing all over the place again. Given the

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][lbaas][heat][octavia] Heat engine doesn't detect lbaas listener failures

2016-09-28 Thread Jiahao Liang
But in the lbaas db, all lbaas resources have the provisioning_status and operating_status fields[1]. [1] http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/neutron-lbaas/tree/neutron_lbaas/db/loadbalancer/models.py#n352 Also there are apis which allows drivers to maintain them[2]. [2]

[openstack-dev] [Ironic] The Ironic Grenade gate job is currently broken. Please don't do recheck on patches

2016-09-28 Thread Villalovos, John L
Currently the Ironic Grenade gate job is broken. Until the issue is resolved please don't do recheck on openstack/ironic patch. Work is ongoing to figure out why it stopped working. __ OpenStack Development Mailing List

[openstack-dev] TC candidacy

2016-09-28 Thread Chris Dent
Despite its name, the Technical Committee has become the part of the OpenStack contributor community that enshrines, defines, and -- in some rare cases -- enforces what it means to be "OpenStack". Meanwhile, the community has seen a great deal of growth and change. Some of these changes have

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla][fuel][tripleo] Reference architecture to deploy OpenStack on k8s

2016-09-28 Thread Davanum Srinivas
Here you go Flavio, Sergey and team collected some information from fuel-ccp efforts. Design for OpenStack Containerized Control Plane : https://review.openstack.org/#/c/378266/ Design document for clustering services on k8s : https://review.openstack.org/#/c/378244/ Add test plan/results for

[openstack-dev] TC Candidacy

2016-09-28 Thread Ed Leafe
Hello! I am announcing my candidacy for a position on the OpenStack Technical Committee. For those who do not know me, I have been involved with OpenStack since the very beginning, working for Rackspace as a core member of the Nova team. An internal job change took me away from active development

[openstack-dev] [tripleo] Getting the UI to talk with Undercloud API service endpoints

2016-09-28 Thread Dan Trainor
Hi - I want to bring up a subject that needs a little more attention. There are a few ideas floating around but it's important that we get this done right. UI is unique in the sense that it operates almost entirely in a browser, talking directly to service API endpoints which it either figures

Re: [openstack-dev] [puppet] Proposing David Moreau Simard part of Puppet OpenStack CI core team

2016-09-28 Thread Iury Gregory
+1 from me, David is doing an awesome job in p-o-i =) 2016-09-28 13:08 GMT-03:00 Rich Megginson : > On 09/28/2016 10:06 AM, Emilien Macchi wrote: > >> Until now, we had no specific team for dealing with Puppet OpenStack >> CI (aka openstack/puppet-openstack-integration

[openstack-dev] TC candidacy

2016-09-28 Thread Jim Rollenhagen
I'd like to throw in my hat to serve the community as a TC member. My name is Jim Rollenhagen, but I'm better known in the community as jroll. I've worked in many environments, from 20-person startup to massive corporations. For the past three years, I've been working on OpenStack at Rackspace. I

Re: [openstack-dev] [puppet] Proposing David Moreau Simard part of Puppet OpenStack CI core team

2016-09-28 Thread Rich Megginson
On 09/28/2016 10:06 AM, Emilien Macchi wrote: Until now, we had no specific team for dealing with Puppet OpenStack CI (aka openstack/puppet-openstack-integration project). But we have noticed that David was doing consistent work to contribute to Puppet OpenStack CI by adding more coverage, but

[openstack-dev] [puppet] Proposing David Moreau Simard part of Puppet OpenStack CI core team

2016-09-28 Thread Emilien Macchi
Until now, we had no specific team for dealing with Puppet OpenStack CI (aka openstack/puppet-openstack-integration project). But we have noticed that David was doing consistent work to contribute to Puppet OpenStack CI by adding more coverage, but also helping when things are broken. David is

Re: [openstack-dev] [Solum] Nominating Zhu Rong for Solum core

2016-09-28 Thread James Y. Li
+1 Look forward to more contributions from you! On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 8:32 AM, Devdatta Kulkarni < kulkarni.devda...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi team, > > I would like to propose Zhu Rong (irc: zhurong) to be included as Solum > core. > > Zhu Rong has been very active in different parts of Solum

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][elections][TC] TC Candidacy

2016-09-28 Thread Nikhil Komawar
I noticed a good statement, marked it inline. On 9/28/16 7:24 AM, John Davidge wrote: > Hi Zane, > > Thanks for pointing this out! My interpretation of the StackForge > Retirement page[1] was wrong on that point. I've updated the blog post to > reflect that (without removing the original

Re: [openstack-dev] [Solum] Nominating Zhu Rong for Solum core

2016-09-28 Thread Vijendar Komalla
+1 From: Devdatta Kulkarni Date: Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 8:32 AM Subject: [Solum] Nominating Zhu Rong for Solum core To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Hi team, I would like to propose Zhu Rong (irc: zhurong) to be included as Solum core. Zhu Rong has been very

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] ops meetup feedback

2016-09-28 Thread Joshua Harlow
Matt Riedemann wrote: On 9/28/2016 12:10 AM, Joshua Harlow wrote: ACTION: we should make sure workarounds are advertised better ACTION: we should have some document about "when cells"? This is a difficult question to answer because "it depends." It's akin to asking "how many

[openstack-dev] [sahara] Skip next meeting

2016-09-28 Thread Vitaly Gridnev
Hi team, Since all of us are preparing for future summit and there is no specific topics to cover, I think that we should skip meeting tomorrow at Sept 29. If there is topic to discuss, please write email to mailing list about your topic. PS: Please, continue sharing your ideas about future

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] ops meetup feedback

2016-09-28 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 9/28/2016 12:10 AM, Joshua Harlow wrote: ACTION: we should make sure workarounds are advertised better ACTION: we should have some document about "when cells"? This is a difficult question to answer because "it depends." It's akin to asking "how many nova-api/nova-conductor processes should

[openstack-dev] [ironic] Newton post-mortem

2016-09-28 Thread Jim Rollenhagen
Similar to keystone/neutron/nova, I thought it would be healthy for us to do a post-mortem on the Newton cycle. Here's the etherpad: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/ironic-newton-retrospective Let's try to keep it troll-free (I know it's hard). Also note I put a poll about having a summit

[openstack-dev] [Solum] Nominating Zhu Rong for Solum core

2016-09-28 Thread Devdatta Kulkarni
Hi team, I would like to propose Zhu Rong (irc: zhurong) to be included as Solum core. Zhu Rong has been very active in different parts of Solum over several months now. His primary contribution has been moving Solum to use Oslo libraries, thereby making our project satisfy one of the

[openstack-dev] [vitrage] Barcelona design sessions

2016-09-28 Thread Afek, Ifat (Nokia - IL)
Hi, There will be three Vitrage design sessions in Barcelona: Wednesday 15:05-15:45: workroom Wednesday 15:55-16:35: fishbowl Wednesday 17:55-18:35: workroom I gathered the ideas that were raised in the etherpad below, and created a draft for the design session discussions. I’ll be happy to

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] Next API meeting cancelled

2016-09-28 Thread Jim Rollenhagen
On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 2:30 PM, Devananda van der Veen wrote: > Considering I'm the only one currently working on it / bringing up new > topics, I > think biweekly is a better match to the pace I'm working on this. > > However, I hope that changes after the summit /

[openstack-dev] [horizon] Integration Tests Status

2016-09-28 Thread Rob Cresswell
Hi all, So the integration tests have started failing all over the place again. Given the number of failures over the past few weeks I've put up a patch to make them non-voting [1]. Please stop rechecking patches until this merges. Reviewers, please be sure to check the test logs when they

Re: [openstack-dev] os-loganalyze, project log parsing, or ...

2016-09-28 Thread Clint Byrum
Excerpts from Andrew Laski's message of 2016-09-27 11:36:07 -0400: > Hello all, > > Recently I noticed that people would look at logs from a Zuul née > Jenkins CI run and comment something like "there seem to be more > warnings in here than usual." And so I thought it might be nice to > quantify

Re: [openstack-dev] [octavia] Multi-node controller testing

2016-09-28 Thread Miguel Angel Ajo Pelayo
I just found this one created recently, and I will try to build on top of it: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/371807/12 On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 1:52 PM, Miguel Angel Ajo Pelayo wrote: > Refloating this thread. > > I posted this rfe/bug [1], and I'm planning to come up

[openstack-dev] [networking-cisco] networking-cisco IRC meetings

2016-09-28 Thread Sam Betts (sambetts)
TL;DR networking-cisco IRC meetings will be held bi-weekly on #openstack-meeting-3 starting from 2016/10/11 With the results of the doodle poll, and some pointers from Steve and Jeremy (thanks guys for the info) I've successfully organised the time and place for the networking-cisco IRC

Re: [openstack-dev] os-loganalyze, project log parsing, or ...

2016-09-28 Thread Andrew Laski
On Wed, Sep 28, 2016, at 07:15 AM, Sean Dague wrote: > On 09/27/2016 06:19 PM, Andrew Laski wrote: > > > > > I totally understand where you're coming from. I just see it > > differently. > > > > The way it was done did not affect any other projects, and the plumbing > > used is something that

Re: [openstack-dev] [octavia] Multi-node controller testing

2016-09-28 Thread Miguel Angel Ajo Pelayo
Refloating this thread. I posted this rfe/bug [1], and I'm planning to come up with an experimental job that triggers one of the basic neutron/lbaas tests with octavia. I wonder if even picking up the scenario one for now could make sense, it's not very stable at the moment, but may be spreading

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][elections][TC] TC Candidacy

2016-09-28 Thread John Davidge
Hi Zane, Thanks for pointing this out! My interpretation of the StackForge Retirement page[1] was wrong on that point. I've updated the blog post to reflect that (without removing the original interpretation). The discussion about renaming git repos is a bit of a red herring, because what we're

Re: [openstack-dev] os-loganalyze, project log parsing, or ...

2016-09-28 Thread Sean Dague
On 09/27/2016 06:19 PM, Andrew Laski wrote: > > I totally understand where you're coming from. I just see it > differently. > > The way it was done did not affect any other projects, and the plumbing > used is something that could have easily be left in. And as luck would > have it there's

[openstack-dev] Adding new functionality to networking scenario tests in tempest

2016-09-28 Thread Barber, Ofer
Hi, I'm working on adding new tests to the networking scenario tests. I see that there is a class named "NetworkScenarioTest" in manager.py file. In that class, there are some helpers functions like '_create_network', 'create_subnet', ... Is this the place to add more helpers functions like

[openstack-dev] [release][horizon] horizon Newton RC2 available

2016-09-28 Thread Thierry Carrez
Hello everyone, A new release candidate for horizon for the end of the Newton cycle was generated, to catch release-critical fixes and include recent translations. You can find the source code tarball at: [...] Unless new release-critical issues are found that warrant a release candidate

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] [devstack] nova-api did not start

2016-09-28 Thread edison xiang
Hi Tony, As you suggest, I find the reason of this problem. I have removed "API_WORKES=0" in local.conf. It works. Thanks very much. Best Regards, xiangxinyong Tony Breeds 于2016年9月28日周三 上午11:28写道: > On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 11:10:52AM +0800, xiangxinyong wrote: > > Hi

[openstack-dev] [tricircle]agenda of weekly meeting Sept.28

2016-09-28 Thread joehuang
Agenda of Sept.28 weekly meeting, let's continue the topics: # Newton cycle design summit planning: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/ocata-tricircle-sessions-planning # patch review before freeze date Sept.30 # open discussion How to join: # IRC meeting:

Re: [openstack-dev] [tricircle]freeze date and patches to be merged for Newton release

2016-09-28 Thread joehuang
Thank you all for the great effort, now only two patches of MUST TO HAVE are on the way to be merged: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/372414/ installation update https://review.openstack.org/#/c/326192/ volume detach Best Regards Chaoyi Huang (joehuang) From:

Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Fedora Atomic image that supports kubernetes external load balancer (for stable/mitaka)

2016-09-28 Thread Ton Ngo
Thanks Steve. We indeed have been using the image built by Yolanda's DIB elements and things have been stable. Dane and I have resolved the problems with the load balancer at least for the LBaaS v1. For LBaaS v2, we need to build a new image with Kubernetes 1.3 and we just got one built today.