[openstack-dev] [vitrage] bp:static-datasource-config-format working items

2016-11-14 Thread Yujun Zhang
Hi folks. I have just started working on the blueprint about static datasource config format[1]. The planned working items are as following. 1. create new datasource `static` to parse new configuration format 2. parse old configuration format in `static` with a proxy to existing

[openstack-dev] [storlets] IRC meeting today

2016-11-14 Thread eran
Hi, We will skip this week's meeting due to majority of members who cannot join. Apologies for the late notice. Thanks, Eran __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe:

[openstack-dev] [karbor] Karbor weekly irc meeting

2016-11-14 Thread edison xiang
Hi guys, Karbor today's weekly irc meeting will be held at 15:00 UTC #openstack-meeting. Weclome to add your agenda at [1] and welcome to join the meeting. [1] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Karbor Best Regards, xiangxinyong

[openstack-dev] [neutron] Reviews needed in neutron-lib

2016-11-14 Thread Henry Gessau
During the meeting today I promised to provide a list of reviews in neutron-lib that need review attention. The following are patches that "rehome" code from neutron core into neutron-lib and are therefore important to keep up the velocity of neutron-lib adoption:

Re: [openstack-dev] 答复: Re: [Senlin]Nominating Ruijie Yuan for Senlin core reviewer

2016-11-14 Thread Yanyan Hu
Hi, guys, thanks a lot for your vote. Now I have got +1 from all core reviewers except Xinhui. And I have confirmed with her offline and she also agrees with this nomination. So I think we can congratulate Ruijie Yuan to become core reviewer of Senlin now:) I will change senlin-core group to

Re: [openstack-dev] Fedora AArch64 (64-bit ARM) support in diskimage-builder

2016-11-14 Thread Gregory Haynes
On Mon, Nov 14, 2016, at 05:06 PM, dmar...@redhat.com wrote: > On 11/14/2016 04:40 PM, Ben Nemec wrote: > > > > > > On 11/11/2016 10:55 AM, dmar...@redhat.com wrote: > >> > >> I have been looking at using diskimage-builder on Fedora AArch64. While > >> there is 64-bit ARM support for Ubuntu

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic] Baremetal Storage Service?

2016-11-14 Thread Akira Yoshiyama
Hi Jay, Thank you for your comments. 2016-11-14 2:19 GMT+09:00 Jay Pipes : > On 11/13/2016 01:52 AM, Akira Yoshiyama wrote: >> >> Hi Jay, >> >> 2016-11-13 3:12 GMT+09:00 Jay Pipes : >>> >>> On 11/12/2016 09:31 AM, Akira Yoshiyama wrote: Hi

Re: [openstack-dev] [Horizon] ui-cookiecutter

2016-11-14 Thread Shuu Mutou
Hi Thai, I created new blueprint[1], and added the BP to next IRC meeting agenda[2]. I hope the topic will be discussed in the meeting. [1]https://blueprints.launchpad.net/horizon/+spec/ui-cookiecutter [2]https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Horizon Best regards, Shu Muto > -Original

Re: [openstack-dev] [All] Finish test job transition to Ubuntu Xenial

2016-11-14 Thread Clark Boylan
On Mon, Nov 14, 2016, at 05:21 PM, Neil Jerram wrote: > On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 9:50 PM Clark Boylan wrote: > > > If you have jobs still running on trusty the next step is to fire up a > > Xenial instance locally and run that test to see if it works. > > > > Can you advise

Re: [openstack-dev] [All] Finish test job transition to Ubuntu Xenial

2016-11-14 Thread Neil Jerram
On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 9:50 PM Clark Boylan wrote: > If you have jobs still running on trusty the next step is to fire up a > Xenial instance locally and run that test to see if it works. > Can you advise how big (RAM, CPU, disk) the Xenial instance should be, so as to be

Re: [openstack-dev] [gnocchi] new measures backlog scheduling

2016-11-14 Thread gordon chung
On 14/11/16 05:53 PM, John Dickinson wrote: > > I'm stepping in to an area here (gnocchi) that I know very little about, > so please forgive me where I mess up. > > First, as a practical note, stuff in Swift will be /much/ better when > you spread it across the entire namespace. It's a lot

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Problem with Quota and servers spawned in groups

2016-11-14 Thread melanie witt
On Mon, 14 Nov 2016 17:34:28 -0600, Matt Riedemann wrote: Why do we want to return a list of uuids for servers created? I thought that's why we have the 'return_reservation_id' request parameter for the server multiple-create scenario so that you can get a single reservation ID back and all of

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Problem with Quota and servers spawned in groups

2016-11-14 Thread melanie witt
On Mon, 14 Nov 2016 22:48:01 +0100, Sławek Kapłoński wrote: Are You sure that but https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1458122 is still valid? I tried to spawn instances with min=3 and max=11 when quota was set to 10 and I had spawned 10 instances properly (no any in error state). I also checked

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Problem with Quota and servers spawned in groups

2016-11-14 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 11/14/2016 11:03 AM, Chris Friesen wrote: 3) returning the uuids of all instances booted as a result of the multiboot API call Why do we want to return a list of uuids for servers created? I thought that's why we have the 'return_reservation_id' request parameter for the server

Re: [openstack-dev] [All] Finish test job transition to Ubuntu Xenial

2016-11-14 Thread Clark Boylan
On Mon, Nov 7, 2016, at 01:48 PM, Clark Boylan wrote: > Hello everyone, > > The infra team would really like to get the Ubuntu Xenial for testing > transition completed early this cycle. We are planning to switch any > jobs that remain on Ubuntu Trusty but should be on Ubuntu Xenial on > December

Re: [openstack-dev] Fedora AArch64 (64-bit ARM) support in diskimage-builder

2016-11-14 Thread dmarlin
On 11/14/2016 04:40 PM, Ben Nemec wrote: On 11/11/2016 10:55 AM, dmar...@redhat.com wrote: I have been looking at using diskimage-builder on Fedora AArch64. While there is 64-bit ARM support for Ubuntu (arm64), there appear to be a few things missing for Fedora. Is this the correct list to

Re: [openstack-dev] [gnocchi] new measures backlog scheduling

2016-11-14 Thread John Dickinson
On 14 Nov 2016, at 13:57, gordon chung wrote: > hi, > > one issue i've noticed with our 'backlog' scheduling is that we register > all our new measures in a single folder/filestore object. this folder or > object in most production cases can grow quite large (tens/hundreds of > thousands). so

Re: [openstack-dev] Fedora AArch64 (64-bit ARM) support in diskimage-builder

2016-11-14 Thread Ben Nemec
On 11/11/2016 10:55 AM, dmar...@redhat.com wrote: I have been looking at using diskimage-builder on Fedora AArch64. While there is 64-bit ARM support for Ubuntu (arm64), there appear to be a few things missing for Fedora. Is this the correct list to ask questions, and propose minor changes

[openstack-dev] [gnocchi] new measures backlog scheduling

2016-11-14 Thread gordon chung
hi, one issue i've noticed with our 'backlog' scheduling is that we register all our new measures in a single folder/filestore object. this folder or object in most production cases can grow quite large (tens/hundreds of thousands). so we don't load it all into memory, the drivers will only

Re: [openstack-dev] [api]

2016-11-14 Thread Edward Leafe
On Nov 14, 2016, at 3:14 PM, Ed Leafe wrote: > Since we already had ‘new’, I thought that ‘nin’ would be consistent. No > other reason to prefer it, though. s/new/neq Damn you autocorrect! -- Ed Leafe

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Problem with Quota and servers spawned in groups

2016-11-14 Thread Sławek Kapłoński
Hello, I remember that Melanie told me that there was another issues there and I talked with her to check all cases. Are You sure that but https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1458122 is still valid? I tried to spawn instances with min=3 and max=11 when quota was set to 10 and I had spawned 10

[openstack-dev] [ironic] this week's priorities and subteam reports

2016-11-14 Thread Loo, Ruby
Hi, We are nerdy to present this week's subteam report for Ironic. As usual, this is pulled directly from the Ironic whiteboard[0] and formatted. NEW! Starting today, we will also include the week's priorities (also available from the whiteboard[0]). The priorities are decided at Monday's

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] python-wsmanclient future

2016-11-14 Thread Richard.Pioso
Hi, A strong case has been made for abandoning the python-wsmanclient project. Barring further information or another, more compelling argument from the community, my team supports the proposal to abandon it. Rick -Original Message- From: Dmitry Tantsur [mailto:dtant...@redhat.com]

Re: [openstack-dev] [api]

2016-11-14 Thread Ed Leafe
On Nov 14, 2016, at 2:52 PM, Ian Cordasco wrote: > not_in is nice and explicit while nin and out are a bit, more clever. I think > we should avoid trying to be clever. Since we already had ‘new’, I thought that ‘nin’ would be consistent. No other reason to prefer it,

[openstack-dev] [new][openstackclient] os-client-config 1.24.0 release (ocata)

2016-11-14 Thread no-reply
We are tickled pink to announce the release of: os-client-config 1.24.0: OpenStack Client Configuation Library This release is part of the ocata release series. The source is available from: http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/os-client-config Download the package from:

Re: [openstack-dev] [api]

2016-11-14 Thread Ian Cordasco
-Original Message- From: Ed Leafe Reply: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Date: November 14, 2016 at 11:29:59 To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][kolla] Ansible module with GPLv3

2016-11-14 Thread Ian Cordasco
-Original Message- From: Michał Jastrzębski Reply: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Date: November 14, 2016 at 09:54:48 To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)

[openstack-dev] [networking_ovn] router not loading

2016-11-14 Thread Murali R
I get this error after configuring neutron & restart server for networking_ovn with L3 using ovn_l3. Why is it not recognizing the class that is there? 2016-11-14 12:12:12.001 12922 ERROR neutron ImportError: Plugin 'networking_ovn.l3.l3_ovn.OVNL3RouterPlugin' not found. The file l3_ovn.py is

Re: [openstack-dev] [manila] spec detail of IPv6's export locations

2016-11-14 Thread Ben Swartzlander
On 11/13/2016 10:03 PM, TommyLike Hu wrote: Hey manila memebers and driver maintainers, I wanna set up an new thread to talk about the proper and better exprienced way for both end users and drivers who want use or support IPv6 in manila, and I wish this can be discussed and optimised

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] Removing agent vendor passthru and unsupported drivers

2016-11-14 Thread Jim Rollenhagen
On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 1:34 PM, wrote: > Agree with removal of unsupported drivers. > For supported drivers we will still need to support passthru. > First, because it is currently used by many customers and for many drivers. > Second, we will need to add support in

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][fwaas] neutron-fwaas meeting time change

2016-11-14 Thread Nate Johnston
On Sat, Oct 29, 2016 at 08:41:42AM +, Nate Johnston wrote: > Hello neutron-fwaas team, > > With the expiration of Daylight Savings Time imminent in the USA, I would like > to propose that we change the meeting time for the neutron-fwaas IRC meeting > from the current value of 0400 UTC. Here

Re: [openstack-dev] [Horizon] ui-cookiecutter

2016-11-14 Thread Thai Q Tran
Hi Shuu,   Sorry for the delay again, I just got back from vacation. I think your cookiecutter will be useful in a number of ways.   1. We can use it to easily generate plugins for beginners 2. We can use it in Horizon's startdash command (have to look into this) for internal use   Ideally, the

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] Removing agent vendor passthru and unsupported drivers

2016-11-14 Thread Arkady.Kanevsky
Agree with removal of unsupported drivers. For supported drivers we will still need to support passthru. First, because it is currently used by many customers and for many drivers. Second, we will need to add support in Ironic and expose it in API for many features before we can do them without

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][kolla] Ansible module with GPLv3

2016-11-14 Thread Jeremy Stanley
On 2016-11-14 11:11:09 -0500 (-0500), Zane Bitter wrote: [...] > I think the DCO process makes things much clearer though. It's > quite easy to understand that contributions to an ASL2-licensed > repo are ASL2 and contributions to a GPL-licensed repo are GPL. [...] Well, it bears pointing out

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] priorities for O-1

2016-11-14 Thread Bashmakov, Alexander
Please take note of another patch related to the list below: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/396919/ This one updates the existing Community Images spec with implementation details and justification for the design decision to make image visibility default to 'shared'. Regards, Alex

Re: [openstack-dev] [Congress] Magnum_driver

2016-11-14 Thread Adrian Otto
Ruben, I found the following two reviews: https://review.openstack.org/397150 Magnum_driver for congress https://review.openstack.org/397151 Test for magnum_driver Are these what you are referring to, or is it something else? Thanks, Adrian > On Nov 14, 2016, at 4:13 AM, Ruben

[openstack-dev] diskimage-builder 01-override-yum-arch question

2016-11-14 Thread dmarlin
I was looking at 01-override-yum-arch in diskimage-builder, and have a question. Is the following code correct in git, or should $arch be written into /etc/dnf/vars/arch, similar to the yum path (for F22 and older) as shown below? ---

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][kolla] Ansible module with GPLv3

2016-11-14 Thread Clint Byrum
Excerpts from Jeremy Stanley's message of 2016-11-14 17:26:49 +: > On 2016-11-14 09:53:03 -0600 (-0600), Michał Jastrzębski wrote: > [...] > > We don't have any other project with multiple licenses in it? What > > would LICENSE file in github show? Do we need to mention parts of > > GPL there?

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][kolla] Ansible module with GPLv3

2016-11-14 Thread Michał Jastrzębski
Sooowe do have a precedence (multiple of them in fact), just it seems to be flying under the radar? On 14 November 2016 at 11:26, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > On 2016-11-14 09:53:03 -0600 (-0600), Michał Jastrzębski wrote: > [...] >> We don't have any other project with

Re: [openstack-dev] [api]

2016-11-14 Thread Ed Leafe
On Nov 14, 2016, at 6:04 AM, milanisko k wrote: > I'd like to ask about possible ``=in:``[1] operator negation implementation > Should the implementation be a negative field name such as > ``?state=in:a,b,c_state=in:x,y,z``? > Or rather a negated operator:

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][kolla] Ansible module with GPLv3

2016-11-14 Thread Jeremy Stanley
On 2016-11-14 09:53:03 -0600 (-0600), Michał Jastrzębski wrote: [...] > We don't have any other project with multiple licenses in it? What > would LICENSE file in github show? Do we need to mention parts of > GPL there? We have plenty (I expect it may even be a majority) of repos containing files

[openstack-dev] [new][security] syntribos 0.3.0 release

2016-11-14 Thread no-reply
We are stoked to announce the release of: syntribos 0.3.0: API Security Scanner Download the package from: https://pypi.python.org/pypi/syntribos Please report issues through launchpad: https://bugs.launchpad.net/syntribos For more details, please see below. Changes in syntribos

[openstack-dev] [new][horizon] XStatic-bootswatch 3.3.7.0 release

2016-11-14 Thread no-reply
We are psyched to announce the release of: XStatic-bootswatch 3.3.7.0: bootswatch 3.3.7 (XStatic packaging standard) This is the first release of XStatic-bootswatch. Download the package from: https://pypi.python.org/pypi/XStatic-bootswatch For more details, please see below. Changes in

[openstack-dev] [new][horizon] XStatic-Font-Awesome 4.7.0.0 release

2016-11-14 Thread no-reply
We are ecstatic to announce the release of: XStatic-Font-Awesome 4.7.0.0: Font-Awesome 4.7.0 (XStatic packaging standard) Download the package from: https://pypi.python.org/pypi/XStatic-Font-Awesome For more details, please see below. Changes in XStatic-Font-Awesome 4.3.0.0..4.7.0.0

[openstack-dev] [glance] Flakey functional test (Was: [Openstack-stable-maint] Stable check of openstack/glance failed)

2016-11-14 Thread Ian Cordasco
-Original Message- From: A mailing list for the OpenStack Stable Branch test reports. Reply: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Date: November 12, 2016 at 00:11:31 To: openstack-stable-ma...@lists.openstack.org

[openstack-dev] [new][horizon] XStatic-roboto-fontface 0.5.0.0 release

2016-11-14 Thread no-reply
We are glad to announce the release of: XStatic-roboto-fontface 0.5.0.0: roboto-fontface 0.5.0 (XStatic packaging standard) This is the first release of XStatic-roboto-fontface. Download the package from: https://pypi.python.org/pypi/XStatic-roboto-fontface For more details, please see

[openstack-dev] [new][openstackclient] os-client-config 1.23.0 release (ocata)

2016-11-14 Thread no-reply
We are ecstatic to announce the release of: os-client-config 1.23.0: OpenStack Client Configuation Library This release is part of the ocata release series. The source is available from: http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/os-client-config Download the package from:

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Problem with Quota and servers spawned in groups

2016-11-14 Thread Chris Friesen
On 11/11/2016 07:07 AM, Sławek Kapłoński wrote: Hello, Can maybe someone (from core team) take a look on that? Thx in advance :) As Melanie Witt mentioned on your bug report, there are a number of issues around multi-boot. (I reported https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1458122 last

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] priorities for O-1

2016-11-14 Thread Ian Cordasco
-Original Message- From: Brian Rosmaita Reply: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Date: November 10, 2016 at 08:32:51 To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] Removing agent vendor passthru and unsupported drivers

2016-11-14 Thread Mathieu Mitchell
Hi Pavlo, See my reply below. On 2016-11-14 7:50 AM, Pavlo Shchelokovskyy wrote: Hi Ironicers, currently I'm busy with removing the lookup/heartbeats "as vendor passthru" from Ironic which we slated for removal in Ocata, and have the following question. Removing the old agent vendor passthru

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] spec proposal freeze

2016-11-14 Thread Ian Cordasco
-Original Message- From: Ian Cordasco Reply: Ian Cordasco Date: November 10, 2016 at 09:52:58 To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject:  Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] spec

Re: [openstack-dev] [nettworking-ovn [patch-update b8af082

2016-11-14 Thread Murali R
Thanks Gary. On Sun, Nov 13, 2016 at 2:33 AM, Gary Kotton wrote: > Hi, > > No, you do not need to do a DB sync. This is just updating a constants – > that is the same constant definition was moved from one please to another. > So it should be backwards compatibale. > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][kolla] Ansible module with GPLv3

2016-11-14 Thread Zane Bitter
On 13/11/16 11:44, Jeremy Stanley wrote: On 2016-11-12 17:44:42 -0800 (-0800), Clint Byrum wrote: https://www.apache.org/licenses/GPL-compatibility.html "This licensing incompatibility applies only when some Apache project software becomes a derivative work of some GPLv3 software, because then

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][kolla] Ansible module with GPLv3

2016-11-14 Thread Thierry Carrez
Michał Jastrzębski wrote: > Logistically it would be best to make this one file GPLv3. No other > files would need to be GPLv3 in Kolla as this is only one that will be > derivative, rest of Kolla will be safe because of subprocess > separation. Who would be able to say whether or not it's

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][kolla] Ansible module with GPLv3

2016-11-14 Thread Michał Jastrzębski
Logistically it would be best to make this one file GPLv3. No other files would need to be GPLv3 in Kolla as this is only one that will be derivative, rest of Kolla will be safe because of subprocess separation. Who would be able to say whether or not it's possible to put single GPLv3 file into

Re: [openstack-dev] [Magnum] New Core Reviewers

2016-11-14 Thread Grant, Jaycen V
Thank you all for your support. I look forward to being able to support the Magnum community in this new role. Jaycen -Original Message- From: Yatin Karel [mailto:yatin.ka...@nectechnologies.in] Sent: Sunday, November 13, 2016 11:04 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra] [infra][neutron] Intel NFV CI voting permission in Neutron

2016-11-14 Thread Jeremy Stanley
On 2016-11-14 10:44:42 + (+), Znoinski, Waldemar wrote: > I would like to acquire voting (+/-1 Verified) permission for our > Intel NFV CI. [...] The requested permission is configured by addition to https://review.openstack.org/#/admin/groups/neutron-ci which is controlled by the members

[openstack-dev] [kolla] repo split underway

2016-11-14 Thread Steven Dake (stdake)
Hey folks, Thanks to the efforts of the openstyack-infra and release teams in coaching me through how to do the job properly, the repo split is ready to go (requires a couple +1’s from inc0 as he is the PTL of our merry band). What this means is some patches that are merging now may have to be

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] When should a project be under Ironic's governance?

2016-11-14 Thread Jim Rollenhagen
On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 11:21 AM, wrote: > Second try > > -Original Message- > From: Kanevsky, Arkady > Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2016 10:08 AM > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > >

[openstack-dev] [infra][gate][all] Changes to the devstack-gate feature matrix

2016-11-14 Thread Sean M. Collins
I have been working on a patch to devstack-gate[1], to implement a long standing TODO, where the feature grid will be used to determine the MY_ENABLED_SERVICES that are set[2]. Prior to this patch, there was a lot of manipulation being done to MY_ENABLED_SERVICES based on environment variables,

Re: [openstack-dev] git review command authentication failed

2016-11-14 Thread Andreas Jaeger
On 2016-11-14 14:45, Raman Gupta wrote: > Hello, > > Link to Error: http://paste.openstack.org/show/589125/ This error can come from a wrong setup, for example when your gerrit preferred e-mail address does not match a primary e-mail address for a foundation individual member account. Please

Re: [openstack-dev] git review command authentication failed

2016-11-14 Thread Raman Gupta
Hello, Link to Error: http://paste.openstack.org/show/589125/ Regards, Raman Gupta On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 7:03 PM, Amrith Kumar wrote: > Hi Raman, welcome. > > > > It would help immensely to look into this if you shared the exact error > message(s) that you received. > > >

Re: [openstack-dev] git review command authentication failed

2016-11-14 Thread Amrith Kumar
Hi Raman, welcome. It would help immensely to look into this if you shared the exact error message(s) that you received. I suggest you copy and paste the error into something like gist.github.org or paste.openstack.org and share a link to that buffer in email. Please make sure you

Re: [openstack-dev] git review command authentication failed

2016-11-14 Thread Raman Gupta
I apologise for this email here. II should have mailed it in general list. Regards, Raman Gupta On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 6:47 PM, Raman Gupta wrote: > Hello, > > I am trying to submit my first change set. I have setup my launchpad > account and then signed in

[openstack-dev] git review command authentication failed

2016-11-14 Thread Raman Gupta
Hello, I am trying to submit my first change set. I have setup my launchpad account and then signed in https://review.openstack.org/. In the setting column (HTTP Password) of https://review.openstack.org/, I got a username and generated password. I am using the above username and password in the

[openstack-dev] [ironic] Removing agent vendor passthru and unsupported drivers

2016-11-14 Thread Pavlo Shchelokovskyy
Hi Ironicers, currently I'm busy with removing the lookup/heartbeats "as vendor passthru" from Ironic which we slated for removal in Ocata, and have the following question. Removing the old agent vendor passthru requires changes to some unsupported drivers whose copies are already in

[openstack-dev] [Congress] Magnum_driver

2016-11-14 Thread Ruben
Hi everybody, I've added the magnum_driver code, that I'm trying to write for congress, to review. I think that I've made some errors. I hope in your help. Ruben __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage

[openstack-dev] [api]

2016-11-14 Thread milanisko k
Hello API WG! I'd like to ask about possible ``=in:``[1] operator negation implementation Should the implementation be a negative field name such as ``?state=in:a,b,c_state=in:x,y,z``? Or rather a negated operator: ``?state=in:a,b,c=not_in:x,y,z``? There already is the ``=neq:`` operator

[openstack-dev] [infra][neutron] Intel NFV CI voting permission in Neutron

2016-11-14 Thread Znoinski, Waldemar
Hi Neutron, Infra Cores et al, I would like to acquire voting (+/-1 Verified) permission for our Intel NFV CI. 1. It's running on Neutron changes since Q1'2015. 2. Wiki [1]. 3. It's using openstack-infra/puppet-openstackci [2] with Zuul 2.1.1 for last 8 months: zuul, gearman, Jenkins, nodepool,

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] More file injection woes

2016-11-14 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 07:11:51PM -0600, Matt Riedemann wrote: > Chris Friesen reported a bug [1] where injected files on a server aren't in > the guest after it's evacuated to another compute host. This is because the > injected files aren't persisted in the nova database at all. Evacuate and >

[openstack-dev] [Neutron] Bug Deputy Report

2016-11-14 Thread Andreas Scheuring
Hi everybody, as I cannot join todays Neutron meeting, I wanted to give a brief update via ML. All bugs are tracked in the following etherpad: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/bugs-2016-11-08 Of interest are the sections - High/Critical - Tagged but not able to confirm (reaching out to

Re: [openstack-dev] openstack/vmware-nsx installation instructions

2016-11-14 Thread Gary Kotton
Hi, Which driver do you plan to use? You can see the relevant configuration settings via https://github.com/openstack/vmware-nsx/tree/master/devstack/lib Thanks Gary From: Micheal B Reply-To: OpenStack List Date: Saturday, November 12, 2016

Re: [openstack-dev] [Horizon] Proposing Kenji Ishii for core

2016-11-14 Thread Radomir Dopieralski
+1 On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 1:24 AM, Richard Jones wrote: > Hi Horizon core team, > > I propose Kenji Ishii as a new Horizon core reviewer. Kenji has been a > solid Horizon contributor for some time, with thoughtful and helpful > reviews showing good judgment and good