Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla] Kolla-k8s core nominations

2016-12-16 Thread Ken Wronkiewicz (kewronki)
+ srwilkers + portdirect :) On 12/14/16, 9:06 AM, "Michał Jastrzębski" wrote: I'm happy to start nomination process for our 2 colleagues: srwilkers and portdirect to kolla-k8s core team! This nomination will is open for 1 week. Kolla-k8s core team,

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][stable][ptls] Tagging liberty as EOL

2016-12-16 Thread Emilien Macchi
Hey Tony, Could we also EOL tripleo-incubator and tripleo-image-elements stable/icehouse please? Thanks, On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 9:35 PM, Tony Breeds wrote: > Hi all, > I'm late in sending this announement, but I'm glad to see several projects > have already

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] proposing Miguel Lavalle as neutron core and Brian Haley as L3 Lt

2016-12-16 Thread German Eichberger
+1 (even if I can’t vote) From: Edgar Magana Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" Date: Friday, December 16, 2016 at 12:46 PM To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Let's kill quota classes (again)

2016-12-16 Thread Jay Pipes
On 12/16/2016 04:36 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: On 12/16/2016 2:20 PM, Jay Pipes wrote: For problems with placing data like this as configuration options, see the hassle we went through in making the allocation_ratio options into fields stored in the DB... Better long-term to have all this kind

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] DB cleanup cron jobs added to rh1

2016-12-16 Thread Emilien Macchi
On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 4:40 PM, Ben Nemec wrote: > Just a heads up for everyone, I've added some DB cleanup jobs to rh1 which > will hopefully prevent the performance degradations over time that we've > been seeing in that environment. Specifically, the crontab now looks

[openstack-dev] [TripleO] DB cleanup cron jobs added to rh1

2016-12-16 Thread Ben Nemec
Just a heads up for everyone, I've added some DB cleanup jobs to rh1 which will hopefully prevent the performance degradations over time that we've been seeing in that environment. Specifically, the crontab now looks like this: # Clean up heat db 0 5 * * * heat-manage purge_deleted 7 #

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Let's kill quota classes (again)

2016-12-16 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 12/16/2016 2:20 PM, Jay Pipes wrote: For problems with placing data like this as configuration options, see the hassle we went through in making the allocation_ratio options into fields stored in the DB... Better long-term to have all this kind of configuration live in a data store (not a

Re: [openstack-dev] OpenStack New Years Resolutions

2016-12-16 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 12/12/2016 5:40 PM, Nick Chase wrote: OK, so if you were putting together New Year's Resolutions for OpenStack development for 2017, what would they be? Nova will create <= 1 new database in 2017! -- Thanks, Matt Riedemann

Re: [openstack-dev] [meteos] Meteos Released !!

2016-12-16 Thread Denis Makogon
Hello Hiroyuki. Congrats on public release. So, i'd like to clarify few things. I know that for running ML jobs Meteos needs Spark instances and Meteos talks to Sahara to deploy them. So, i'm not quite familiar with infrastructure drives in Sahara, but would that make sense to work with Docker

[openstack-dev] [api][zun] Effective URL for resource actions

2016-12-16 Thread Hongbin Lu
Hi API working group, I am from the Zun team and I wanted to consult with you about the API design. Our team was discussing what is the best API design for exposing different container operations [1]. There are two proposed options: 1. Expose multiple URLs for individual container operation.

[openstack-dev] [Cinder] Marking Tintri driver as unsupported

2016-12-16 Thread Sean McGinnis
Checking name: Tintri CI last seen: 2016-12-16 16:50:50 (0:43:36 old) last success: 2016-11-16 20:42:29 (29 days, 20:45:46 old) success rate: 19% Per Cinder's non-compliance policy [1] this patch [2] marks the driver as unsupported and deprecated and it will be approved if the issue is not

[openstack-dev] [Cinder] Marking Synology driver as unsupported

2016-12-16 Thread Sean McGinnis
Checking name: Synology DSM CI last seen: 2016-12-16 06:37:25 (10:56:44 old) last success: 2016-11-23 21:51:22 (22 days, 19:36:53 old) success rate: 52% Per Cinder's non-compliance policy [1] this patch [2] marks the driver as unsupported and deprecated and it will be approved if the issue is not

[openstack-dev] [Cinder] Marking Quobyte driver unsupported

2016-12-16 Thread Sean McGinnis
Checking name: Quobyte CI last seen: 2016-11-18 08:23:05 (28 days, 9:10:41 old) last success: 2016-11-18 08:23:05 (28 days, 9:05:10 old) success rate: 35% Per Cinder's non-compliance policy [1] this patch [2] marks the driver as unsupported and deprecated and it will be approved if the issue is

[openstack-dev] [Cinder] Marking NexentaEdge driver unsupported

2016-12-16 Thread Sean McGinnis
Checking name: Nexenta Edge CI last seen: 2016-12-16 17:24:40 (0:08:08 old) last success: 2016-11-23 10:54:16 (23 days, 6:33:59 old) success rate: 34% Per Cinder's non-compliance policy [1] this patch [2] marks the driver as unsupported and deprecated and it will be approved if the issue is not

[openstack-dev] [Cinder] Marking HPE XP driver as unsupported

2016-12-16 Thread Sean McGinnis
Checking name: XP Cinder CI last seen: 2016-08-16 09:34:42 (122 days, 7:56:25 old) last success: 2016-08-09 14:39:13 (129 days, 2:49:02 old) success rate: 32% Per Cinder's non-compliance policy [1] this patch [2] marks the driver as unsupported and deprecated and it will be approved if the issue

[openstack-dev] [Cinder] Marking Huawei driver as unsupported

2016-12-16 Thread Sean McGinnis
Checking name: Huawei FusionStorage CI last seen: 2016-09-30 08:36:22 (77 days, 8:53:56 old) last success: 2016-09-30 08:36:22 (77 days, 8:51:53 old) success rate: 54% Per Cinder's non-compliance policy [1] this patch [2] marks the driver as unsupported and deprecated and it will be approved if

[openstack-dev] [Cinder] Marking DotHill drivers as unsupported

2016-12-16 Thread Sean McGinnis
Checking name: Vedams DotHillDriver CI last seen: 2016-02-20 02:24:48 (300 days, 15:04:30 old) last success: 2016-02-17 20:46:49 (302 days, 20:41:26 old) success rate: 83% Per Cinder's non-compliance policy [1] this patch [2] marks the driver as unsupported and deprecated and it will be approved

[openstack-dev] [Cinder] Marking Cloudbyte driver as unsupported

2016-12-16 Thread Sean McGinnis
Checking name: CloudByte CI last seen: 2016-09-27 11:49:45 (80 days, 5:38:50 old) last success: 2016-09-27 11:49:45 (80 days, 5:38:30 old) success rate: 72% Per Cinder's non-compliance policy [1] this patch [2] marks the driver as unsupported and deprecated and it will be approved if the issue

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Let's kill quota classes (again)

2016-12-16 Thread Jay Pipes
On 12/15/2016 09:00 AM, Matt Riedemann wrote: On 12/15/2016 3:11 AM, Andrey Volkov wrote: Hi, I totally agree with Matt than `os-quota-class-sets` is inconsistent. It has that hardcoded default class can't be changed. API call is documented neither Nova nor Cinder (has the same API for

[openstack-dev] [glance] priorities for the coming week (12/16-12/22)

2016-12-16 Thread Brian Rosmaita
We had good movement in the Glance priority list this past week, with most items being resolved. Good work, everyone! Here's what we're focusing on now: (1) Patch to enable better request-id tracking: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/352892/ This has been sitting on the list for a few weeks and

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] proposing Miguel Lavalle as neutron core and Brian Haley as L3 Lt

2016-12-16 Thread Edgar Magana
Awesome! Well done Miguel! +1 Edgar From: "Armando M." Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" Date: Thursday, December 15, 2016 at 3:14 PM To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage

[openstack-dev] [refstack] Next IRC meeting on January 3, 2017

2016-12-16 Thread Catherine Cuong Diep
Hi Everyone, In the last IRC meeting [1], the RefStack team had decided to cancel the next two meetings in 2016. The next meeting will be held on January 3, 2017. Happy Holidays! [1] http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/refstack/2016/refstack.2016-12-13-19.00.log.txt Catherine Diep

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] proposing Miguel Lavalle as neutron core and Brian Haley as L3 Lt

2016-12-16 Thread Brandon Logan
+1! On Fri, 2016-12-16 at 00:14 +0100, Armando M. wrote: > Hi neutrinos, > > Miguel Lavalle has been driving the project forward consistently and > reliably. I would like to propose him to be entrusted with +2/+A > rights in the areas he's been most prolific, which are L3 and DHCP.  > > At the

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] proposing Ryan Tidwell and Nate Johnston as service LTs

2016-12-16 Thread Brandon Logan
+1! On Fri, 2016-12-16 at 00:58 +0100, Armando M. wrote: > Hi neutrinos, > > I would like to propose Ryan and Nate as the go-to fellows for > service-related patches. > > Both are core in their repos of focus, namely neutron-dynamic-routing > and neutron-fwaas, and have a good understanding of

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla] Kolla-k8s core nominations

2016-12-16 Thread Serguei Bezverkhi (sbezverk)
portdirect +1 srwilkers +1 Great to have these gents on the team. Serguei -Original Message- From: Fox, Kevin M [mailto:kevin@pnnl.gov] Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2016 2:49 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra] [all][stable][ptls] Tagging liberty as EOL

2016-12-16 Thread Jeremy Stanley
On 2016-12-16 13:58:58 +1100 (+1100), Tony Breeds wrote: [...] > Due to a failure in the release pipline [1] some of the release > jobs haven't been done. [...] > [1] > http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/release-job-failures/2016-December/000324.html [...] The failure looks an awful lot like

[openstack-dev] [release][ptl][all] release freeze 26-30 Dec

2016-12-16 Thread Doug Hellmann
Most of the release team will be on PTO the week of 26-30 Dec, so there are not likely to be any releases performed that week. Please plan accordingly. Doug __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)

Re: [openstack-dev] Issues with libvirt transition 1.2.7 -> 2.0.0 (CentOS 7.3)

2016-12-16 Thread Neil Jerram
On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 4:08 PM Steve Gordon wrote: > - Original Message - > > From: "Neil Jerram" > > To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" < > openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> > > Sent: Friday, December 16, 2016

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat][TripleO] How to run mistral workflows via templates

2016-12-16 Thread Steven Hardy
On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 04:02:51PM +0100, Thomas Herve wrote: > On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 2:57 PM, Steven Hardy wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 02:03:10PM +0100, Thomas Herve wrote: > >> On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 1:17 PM, Giulio Fidente > >> wrote: > >> >

[openstack-dev] [release] Release countdown for week R-9, 19-23 Dec

2016-12-16 Thread Doug Hellmann
All milestone-based deliverables have been tagged with the Ocata-2 milestone tags. Thank you, liaisons, for handling the milestone so smoothly! Focus - Feature work and major refactoring should be well under way as we pass the second milestone. The deadline for non-client library releases

[openstack-dev] [release] team meetings 23 Dec and 30 Dec canceled

2016-12-16 Thread Doug Hellmann
As we discussed in today's meeting, the release team meetings for 23 Dec and 30 Dec are canceled. Our next team meeting will be 6 Jan. Doug __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe:

Re: [openstack-dev] [release][ptl][all] self-service branch management

2016-12-16 Thread Doug Hellmann
Excerpts from joehuang's message of 2016-12-16 01:03:03 +: > Hello, Doug, > > This is great. One question about the branch patches. In the past, when a new > branch was created, we often have to update the devstack plugin to pull the > code from correct branch. So if self-service branch

Re: [openstack-dev] Issues with libvirt transition 1.2.7 -> 2.0.0 (CentOS 7.3)

2016-12-16 Thread Steve Gordon
- Original Message - > From: "Neil Jerram" > To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" > > Sent: Friday, December 16, 2016 10:53:02 AM > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] Issues with libvirt transition 1.2.7 -> 2.0.0

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla][tc] Video Meetings - input requested

2016-12-16 Thread Davanum Srinivas
Seconding Doug's call. On concrete suggestion from me is to give enough time ahead of the video meeting so folks who are not able to participate can provide their input via other medium for consideration during the meeting. Folks will also be able to chime in about if the time would work or not

[openstack-dev] [release][infra][all] Signing Keys for Ocata Release

2016-12-16 Thread Davanum Srinivas
Folks, you may have noticed the releases.openstack.org now shows the PGP signatures of all release artifacts, example: https://releases.openstack.org/ocata/index.html#ocata-nova Many thanks to the Infra team to making this happen, details are here:

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla][tc] Video Meetings - input requested

2016-12-16 Thread Ian Cordasco
  -Original Message- From: Michał Jastrzębski Reply: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Date: December 15, 2016 at 14:58:48 To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)

Re: [openstack-dev] Issues with libvirt transition 1.2.7 -> 2.0.0 (CentOS 7.3)

2016-12-16 Thread Neil Jerram
On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 3:35 PM Steve Gordon wrote: > > > - Original Message - > > From: "Neil Jerram" > > To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" < > openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> > > Sent: Friday, December 16, 2016

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][bugs] Useful metrics?

2016-12-16 Thread Markus Zoeller
On 13.12.2016 19:29, Augustina Ragwitz wrote: > Previously Markus Z. did some great work in putting together a dashboard > we've been using for bug queue maintenance. Are there additional reports > or visualizations of the bug queue that might be interesting or useful > for the team? Is there some

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] proposing Ryan Tidwell and Nate Johnston as service LTs

2016-12-16 Thread Miguel Lavalle
+1 for both of them On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 5:58 PM, Armando M. wrote: > Hi neutrinos, > > I would like to propose Ryan and Nate as the go-to fellows for > service-related patches. > > Both are core in their repos of focus, namely neutron-dynamic-routing and > neutron-fwaas,

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla][tc] Video Meetings - input requested

2016-12-16 Thread Doug Hellmann
Excerpts from Michał Jastrzębski's message of 2016-12-15 14:57:10 -0600: > I will defend this thing as something what we needed at the time. > Sometimes heated up video discussion helps to resolve > misunderstandings which otherwise could grow up and become conflicts > in community, which would

Re: [openstack-dev] Issues with libvirt transition 1.2.7 -> 2.0.0 (CentOS 7.3)

2016-12-16 Thread Steve Gordon
- Original Message - > From: "Neil Jerram" > To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" > > Sent: Friday, December 16, 2016 6:40:57 AM > Subject: [openstack-dev] Issues with libvirt transition 1.2.7 -> 2.0.0

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][nova]Accessing nullable, not set versioned object field

2016-12-16 Thread Dan Smith
>> NotImplementedError: Cannot load 'nullable_string' in the base class >> >> Is this the correct behavior? > > Yes, that's the expected behaviour. Yes. >> Then what is the expected behavior if the field is also defaulted to >> None? >> >> fields = { >> 'nullable_string':

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] proposing Miguel Lavalle as neutron core and Brian Haley as L3 Lt

2016-12-16 Thread Brian Haley
+1 for Miguel, he's been doing a great job :) On 12/15/2016 06:14 PM, Armando M. wrote: Hi neutrinos, Miguel Lavalle has been driving the project forward consistently and reliably. I would like to propose him to be entrusted with +2/+A rights in the areas he's been most prolific, which are L3

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] proposing Ryan Tidwell and Nate Johnston as service LTs

2016-12-16 Thread Brian Haley
+1 On 12/15/2016 06:58 PM, Armando M. wrote: Hi neutrinos, I would like to propose Ryan and Nate as the go-to fellows for service-related patches. Both are core in their repos of focus, namely neutron-dynamic-routing and neutron-fwaas, and have a good understanding of the service framework,

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][nova]Accessing nullable, not set versioned object field

2016-12-16 Thread Jay Pipes
On 12/16/2016 07:42 AM, Balázs Gibizer wrote: Hi, What is the expected behavior of accessing a nullable and not set versioned object field? See the following example code: from oslo_versionedobjects import base from oslo_versionedobjects import fields @base.VersionedObjectRegistry.register

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat][TripleO] How to run mistral workflows via templates

2016-12-16 Thread Thomas Herve
On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 2:57 PM, Steven Hardy wrote: > On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 02:03:10PM +0100, Thomas Herve wrote: >> On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 1:17 PM, Giulio Fidente wrote: >> > I was wondering if it would make sense to have a property for the existing

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla][tc] Video Meetings - input requested

2016-12-16 Thread Doug Hellmann
Excerpts from Zane Bitter's message of 2016-12-15 15:16:07 -0500: > The next 'generation' of core reviewers will acquire their knowledge > largely from discussions between the current cores. It's important to > the long-term health of the project not to cut them off from those > discussions,

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla][tc] Video Meetings - input requested

2016-12-16 Thread Flavio Percoco
On 14/12/16 12:05 -0500, Doug Hellmann wrote: Excerpts from Michał Jastrzębski's message of 2016-12-14 09:56:46 -0600: OK, I think we had some grave misunderstandings here. 1. ad-hoc meetings *are not* and *were never meant to be* replacement for weekly meetings. Kolla community is single

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Upgrade readiness check notes

2016-12-16 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 12/16/2016 3:20 AM, Sylvain Bauza wrote: Le 16/12/2016 03:53, Matt Riedemann a écrit : A few of us have talked about writing a command to tell when you're ready to upgrade (restart services with new code) for Ocata because we have a few things landing in Ocata which are going from optional

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] [ci]

2016-12-16 Thread Flavio Percoco
On 14/12/16 21:44 -0500, Emilien Macchi wrote: On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 7:22 PM, Wesley Hayutin wrote: On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 12:04 PM, Wesley Hayutin wrote: Greetings, I wanted to send a status update on the quickstart based containerized compute

[openstack-dev] [L2-Gateway] RPM packaging and Agent configuration

2016-12-16 Thread Ricardo Noriega De Soto
Hello L2GW devs! I'm currently working on the RPM packaging of networking-l2gw project. My undestanding is that depending on the config, I could use whether OpenDaylight or the neutron-l2gw-agent as backend. For the latter case, I'm writing a systemd unit file, but I'd love to get the command

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] proposing Miguel Lavalle as neutron core and Brian Haley as L3 Lt

2016-12-16 Thread Morales, Victor
More likely, my vote doesn’t count but I’ve seen them very actively contributing, so +1 From: "Armando M." > Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat][TripleO] How to run mistral workflows via templates

2016-12-16 Thread Steven Hardy
On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 02:03:10PM +0100, Thomas Herve wrote: > On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 1:17 PM, Giulio Fidente wrote: > > hi, > > > > we're trying to address in TripleO a couple of use cases for which we'd like > > to trigger a Mistral workflow from a Heat template. > > > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Creating a new IRC meeting room ?

2016-12-16 Thread Flavio Percoco
On 07/12/16 14:29 +0100, Thierry Carrez wrote: Dolph Mathews wrote: [...] I think it honestly reflects our current breakdown of contributors & collaboration. The artificial scarcity model only helps a vocal minority with cross-project focus, and just results in odd meeting times for the

[openstack-dev] [kolla] Services consuming RabbitMQ

2016-12-16 Thread Eduardo Gonzalez
Hi all, At this moment we have a couple of services that need to consume connections from a message queue on the client side. This raised change requests to fix the issue with different approaches. Those change requests have several implications on Kolla's overall architecture and security,

Re: [openstack-dev] FW: FW: No Relevant flows in br-int after SFC Creation

2016-12-16 Thread Mohan Kumar
Hi Anirudh, Please try out the suggestion as per our IRC chat and post your experience Thanks., Mohankumar.N On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 3:56 PM, Anirudh Gupta wrote: > Hi Mohan, > > > > Yes, we are getting timeout messages in q-agt logs. > > > > We have

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat][TripleO] How to run mistral workflows via templates

2016-12-16 Thread Thomas Herve
On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 1:17 PM, Giulio Fidente wrote: > hi, > > we're trying to address in TripleO a couple of use cases for which we'd like > to trigger a Mistral workflow from a Heat template. > > One example where this would be useful is the creation of the Swift rings, >

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat][TripleO] How to run mistral workflows via templates

2016-12-16 Thread Giulio Fidente
On 12/16/2016 01:56 PM, Christian Schwede wrote: we're trying to address in TripleO a couple of use cases for which we'd like to trigger a Mistral workflow from a Heat template. One example where this would be useful is the creation of the Swift rings, which need some data related to the Heat

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat][TripleO] How to run mistral workflows via templates

2016-12-16 Thread Christian Schwede
> we're trying to address in TripleO a couple of use cases for which we'd > like to trigger a Mistral workflow from a Heat template. > > One example where this would be useful is the creation of the Swift > rings, which need some data related to the Heat stack (like the list of > Swift nodes and

[openstack-dev] [oslo][nova]Accessing nullable, not set versioned object field

2016-12-16 Thread Balázs Gibizer
Hi, What is the expected behavior of accessing a nullable and not set versioned object field? See the following example code: from oslo_versionedobjects import base from oslo_versionedobjects import fields @base.VersionedObjectRegistry.register class MyObject(base.VersionedObject):

[openstack-dev] [nova] placement/resource providers update 6

2016-12-16 Thread Chris Dent
This will be the last resource provider/placement update for the year. Except the next one at the end of the first week of January. There's a lot of work happening related to placement, on multiple concurrent threads. # What Matters Most The most important placement-related stuff right now is

Re: [openstack-dev] [Zun][Glare][Glance] Building Docker images

2016-12-16 Thread Kairat Kushaev
Hello Denis, unfortunately, I don't have deep knowledge of Zun so i can speak from Glare side only. So Glare can serve as some kind of artifact storage for container files but we need to define artifact structure first. Please note that artifact is immutable after activation so once you need to

Re: [openstack-dev] [Horizon] Weekly wrap-up

2016-12-16 Thread Rob Cresswell (rcresswe)
I think the intent is to get eyes on those patches, to prevent a 1000 line rewrite only for a core to say “I think this is a bad idea”. So for important patches, its probably good to get earlier feedback. Rob On 16 Dec 2016, at 08:13, Radomir Dopieralski

[openstack-dev] [Heat][TripleO] How to run mistral workflows via templates

2016-12-16 Thread Giulio Fidente
hi, we're trying to address in TripleO a couple of use cases for which we'd like to trigger a Mistral workflow from a Heat template. One example where this would be useful is the creation of the Swift rings, which need some data related to the Heat stack (like the list of Swift nodes and

Re: [openstack-dev] Issues with libvirt transition 1.2.7 -> 2.0.0 (CentOS 7.3)

2016-12-16 Thread Neil Jerram
Another thought/query about this: is the libvirt transition from 1.2.7 to 2.0.0 less than usually conservative for an RHEL/CentOS series, and if so, is there a wider reason or move there that it would help to be aware of? Also is there a way of continuing to use CentOS 7 as a platform but still

[openstack-dev] Issues with libvirt transition 1.2.7 -> 2.0.0 (CentOS 7.3)

2016-12-16 Thread Neil Jerram
I appreciate that even libvirt 2.0.0 will be ancient history by now, to its developers, but I am seeing further issues that look associated with the recent CentOS 7 transition from libvirt 1.2.7 to libvirt 2.0.0, and would appreciate any comments on them that people may have. I believe these

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] proposing Miguel Lavalle as neutron core and Brian Haley as L3 Lt

2016-12-16 Thread John Davidge
Huge +1 from me. Miguel has been doing an excellent job chairing the l3-subteam meetings for a long time now. Well deserved! On 12/16/16, 11:00 AM, "Rossella Sblendido" wrote: >well deserved, +1! > >On 12/16/2016 09:32 AM, Miguel Angel Ajo Pelayo wrote: >> +1 :) >> >> On

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] proposing Ryan Tidwell and Nate Johnston as service LTs

2016-12-16 Thread Miguel Angel Ajo Pelayo
+1 Good work. :) On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 11:59 AM, Rossella Sblendido wrote: > +1 > > On 12/16/2016 09:25 AM, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: > > Armando M. wrote: > > > >> Hi neutrinos, > >> > >> I would like to propose Ryan and Nate as the go-to fellows for >

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] proposing Ryan Tidwell and Nate Johnston as service LTs

2016-12-16 Thread Rossella Sblendido
+1 On 12/16/2016 09:25 AM, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: > Armando M. wrote: > >> Hi neutrinos, >> >> I would like to propose Ryan and Nate as the go-to fellows for >> service-related patches. >> >> Both are core in their repos of focus, namely neutron-dynamic-routing >> and

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] proposing Miguel Lavalle as neutron core and Brian Haley as L3 Lt

2016-12-16 Thread Rossella Sblendido
well deserved, +1! On 12/16/2016 09:32 AM, Miguel Angel Ajo Pelayo wrote: > +1 :) > > On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 2:44 AM, Vasudevan, Swaminathan (PNB Roseville) > > > wrote: > > +1 > > __ __ > > *From:*Armando

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Upgrade readiness check notes

2016-12-16 Thread Sylvain Bauza
Le 16/12/2016 03:53, Matt Riedemann a écrit : > A few of us have talked about writing a command to tell when you're > ready to upgrade (restart services with new code) for Ocata because we > have a few things landing in Ocata which are going from optional to > required, namely cells v2 and the

[openstack-dev] [daisycloud-core] Meeting minutes for IRC meeting 0800UTC Dec. 16 2016

2016-12-16 Thread hu . zhijiang
Minutes: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/daisycloud/2016/daisycloud.2016-12-16-07.59.html Minutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/daisycloud/2016/daisycloud.2016-12-16-07.59.txt Log:

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] proposing Miguel Lavalle as neutron core and Brian Haley as L3 Lt

2016-12-16 Thread Miguel Angel Ajo Pelayo
+1 :) On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 2:44 AM, Vasudevan, Swaminathan (PNB Roseville) < swaminathan.vasude...@hpe.com> wrote: > +1 > > > > *From:* Armando M. [mailto:arma...@gmail.com] > *Sent:* Thursday, December 15, 2016 3:15 PM > *To:* OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) < >

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] proposing Ryan Tidwell and Nate Johnston as service LTs

2016-12-16 Thread Ihar Hrachyshka
Armando M. wrote: Hi neutrinos, I would like to propose Ryan and Nate as the go-to fellows for service-related patches. Both are core in their repos of focus, namely neutron-dynamic-routing and neutron-fwaas, and have a good understanding of the service framework,

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] proposing Miguel Lavalle as neutron core and Brian Haley as L3 Lt

2016-12-16 Thread Ihar Hrachyshka
Armando M. wrote: Hi neutrinos, Miguel Lavalle has been driving the project forward consistently and reliably. I would like to propose him to be entrusted with +2/+A rights in the areas he's been most prolific, which are L3 and DHCP. At the same time, I'd like to

Re: [openstack-dev] [Horizon] Weekly wrap-up

2016-12-16 Thread Radomir Dopieralski
I wonder if it really makes sense to put WIP patches on the priority list. I think it's a bit counter-productive, considering that the prioritizing of patches was supposed to make them merge faster -- but we don't want to merge WIP patches, do we? On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 5:31 AM, Richard Jones