Hey guys,
I found rally already releases its 0.8.1 tag from[0][1]. But
I found nothing in openstack/releases project[2]. How rally
create tag?
[0] http://tarballs.openstack.org/rally/
[1] https://github.com/openstack/rally/releases
[2]
https://github.com/openstack/releases/blob/master/deliverable
Hi all
I failed to do the unstack and stack operations with devstack when I want to pull the latest Monasca code and upgrade related projects.
I took following steps:
go to /opt/stackgo to the monasca project folder that I want to upgraderun git pullrun unstack.sh
Hi Roland
I am not sure whether you received my last email because I got a delivery failure notification. I am sending this again to ensure that you can see this email.
Best,
Anqi
- Original message -From: An Qi YL Lu/China/IBMTo: roland.hochm...@hpe.comCc: openstack-dev@lists.opensta
Hi, we are using L3 HA in our production environment now. Router instances
communicate to each other by VRRP protocol. In my opinion, although VRRP is
a control plane thing, but the real VRRP traffic is using data plane nic so
that router namespaces can not talk to each other sometimes when the da
2017-02-11 0:10 GMT+08:00 Ed Leafe :
> Your regular reporter, Chris Dent, is on PTO today, so I'm filling in.
> I'll be brief.
>
> After the flurry of activity to get as much in before the Ocata RCs, this
> past week was relatively calm. Work continued on the patch to have Ironic
> resources track
Excerpts from Brian Rosmaita's message of 2017-02-10 12:39:11 -0500:
> I want to give all interested parties a heads up that I have scheduled a
> session in the Macon room from 9:30-10:30 a.m. on Thursday morning
> (February 23).
>
> Here's what we need to discuss. This is from my perspective as
Quick updates:
- All FFEs patches have been merged except:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/330050/ - so we're green on this
side.
- Upgrade team is still working on automation to upgrade from newton to ocata.
- ovb-updates (CI job with IPv6) doesn't pass -
https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/
On 12 Feb 2017, at 12:13, Boris Bobrov
mailto:bbob...@mirantis.com>> wrote:
I would like to talk about it too.
On 02/10/2017 11:56 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote:
Operators want hierarchical quotas [1]. Nova doesn't have them yet and
we've been hesitant to invest scarce developer resources in them si
Although there has not been much discussion on this point on the mailing list,
I feel we do need to find the right level of granularity for ‘mainstream’
projects:
For CERN, we look for the following before offering a project to our end users:
- Distro packaging (in our case RPMs through RDO)
-
I have been investigating this bug over the week-end:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/1663187
The ovb-updates CI job has been red since we've unpinned Nova in TripleO CI.
Reminder: this job deploys TripleO with IPv6 activated on public endpoints.
I've been able to reproduce the issue loca
Hey folks,
I’d like to remind kolla contributors of this email exchange from Feb 29th,
2016 with the infra team.
I originally requested kolla contributors to rebase all of their patches to
unblock the gate. This was an incorrect request. The infrastructure team
quickly corrected my misunders
Marcin,
I think this work is fantastic!
The Ocata feature deadline has passed. Reference:
https://releases.openstack.org/ocata/schedule.html
The feature freeze deadline was January 25th 2017. What this means is that
this work will need to go into Pike instead of Ocata. One of the reasons you
I would like to talk about it too.
On 02/10/2017 11:56 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote:
> Operators want hierarchical quotas [1]. Nova doesn't have them yet and
> we've been hesitant to invest scarce developer resources in them since
> we've heard that the implementation for hierarchical quotas in Cinder
13 matches
Mail list logo
