[openstack-dev] [Blazar] new instance reservation overview

2017-04-10 Thread Masahito MUROI
Hi Blazar folks, I drafted overview of new instance reservation [1]. It contains motivation and basic idea of the reservation, short-term goal and long-term goal. It's just a draft and entry points for the discussion. We would also discuss some reservations things based on the etherpad

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] [elections] Available time and top priority

2017-04-10 Thread Sean McGinnis
On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 03:40:30PM -0500, Matt Riedemann wrote: > > I don't attend many TC meetings, it's usually on accident, but yeah, when I > do I always note the flurry of cross-talk chatter that just drowns > everything out. I feel like there are usually at least 3 parallel > conversations

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] [elections] Available time and top priority

2017-04-10 Thread Sean McGinnis
On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 11:16:57AM +0200, Thierry Carrez wrote: > > So my question is the following: if elected, how much time do you think > you'll be able to dedicate to Technical Committee affairs (reviewing > proposed changes and pushing your own) ? Starting today, I've moved from a position

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] [elections] Available time and top priority

2017-04-10 Thread Joshua Hesketh
Howdy, To answer the original question, if elected, I should be able to commit at least a few hours per day to the TC (if not more). I can also be quite elastic in this being able to spend more time some weeks than others as the role dictates. My timezone is UTC+10 which makes the meetings at

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] [elections] Available time and top priority

2017-04-10 Thread joehuang
> When there are topics with a lot of people clamoring to talk, Thierry usually > lets people speak in order of "raising > their hand". This reduces cross-talk and lets everyone get their turn to > state what's on their mind. +1, impressive for the "raising their hand" in TC weekly IRC

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack] How to get all detail RPC message and detail context in neutron docs?

2017-04-10 Thread Kevin Benton
I would strongly recommend that you don't build anything based on these messages. The contents change from release to release since this is an internal API between the agents and the server. On Apr 6, 2017 00:48, "Sam" wrote: > Thank you, use debug option will also help us

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][sfc][fwaas][taas][horizon] where would we like to have horizon dashboard for neutron stadium projects?

2017-04-10 Thread Kevin Benton
I think 'a' is probably the way to go since we can mainly rely on existing horizon guides for creating new dashboard repos. On Apr 10, 2017 08:11, "Akihiro Motoki" wrote: > Hi neutrinos (and horizoners), > > As the title says, where would we like to have horizon dashboard for

Re: [openstack-dev] [stable] What's the plan for mitaka-eol?

2017-04-10 Thread Tony Breeds
On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 04:19:00PM -0500, Matt Riedemann wrote: > There was no stable team meeting today but according to the release schedule > page [1], Mitaka EOL happens after today. So what's the plan? Same old song > and dance as always? Yup. I'm generating the list of EOL'able repos

Re: [openstack-dev] [stable] What's the plan for mitaka-eol?

2017-04-10 Thread gordon chung
On 10/04/17 05:19 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: > There was no stable team meeting today but according to the release > schedule page [1], Mitaka EOL happens after today. So what's the plan? > Same old song and dance as always? > i abandoned all the stable/mitaka items in Telemetry projects.

Re: [openstack-dev] [stable] What's the plan for mitaka-eol?

2017-04-10 Thread Ihar Hrachyshka
Yes, please cancel. I don't even see at this point a need for a separate program for the effort. It was applicable before when we dealt with stable gates on daily basis, but it's no longer the case. Ihar On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 2:19 PM Matt Riedemann wrote: > There was no

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] [elections] Available time and top priority

2017-04-10 Thread Amrith Kumar
> -Original Message- > From: Matt Riedemann [mailto:mriede...@gmail.com] > Sent: Monday, April 10, 2017 4:41 PM > To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] [elections] Available time and top priority > > On 4/10/2017 2:55 PM, Dean Troyer wrote: > > > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] [elections] Available time and top priority

2017-04-10 Thread Ed Leafe
On Apr 10, 2017, at 3:40 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: > > I don't attend many TC meetings, it's usually on accident, but yeah, when I > do I always note the flurry of cross-talk chatter that just drowns everything > out. I feel like there are usually at least 3 parallel

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] [elections] Available time and top priority

2017-04-10 Thread Chris Dent
On Mon, 10 Apr 2017, Matt Riedemann wrote: This might also tie back in with what cdent was mentioning, and if the flurry of conversation during a TC meeting throws people off, maybe the minutes should be digested after the meeting in the mailing list. I know the meeting is logged, but it can

[openstack-dev] [stable] What's the plan for mitaka-eol?

2017-04-10 Thread Matt Riedemann
There was no stable team meeting today but according to the release schedule page [1], Mitaka EOL happens after today. So what's the plan? Same old song and dance as always? Also, while I'm here, should the stable team meeting be cancelled? There hasn't been a meeting in a month [2]. Should

Re: [openstack-dev] Ocata - Ubuntu 16.04 - OVN does not work with DPDK

2017-04-10 Thread Martinx - ジェームズ
On 8 April 2017 at 00:37, Martinx - ジェームズ wrote: > Guys, > > I manage to deploy Ocata on Ubuntu 16.04 with OVN for the first time > ever, today! > > It looks very, very good... OVN L3 Router is working, OVN DHCP working... > bridge mappings "br-ex" on each compute

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] [elections] Available time and top priority

2017-04-10 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 4/10/2017 2:55 PM, Dean Troyer wrote: The TC meetings are held in IRC and that may somewhat mitigate the issue for non-native English speakers, but I've had problems myself keeping up at times with the flurry of comments. In any case, I think it would be good to include language in the pile

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] FW: [quotas] Unified Limits Conceptual Spec RFC

2017-04-10 Thread Lance Bragstad
Sending out a heads up that the initial spec [0] merged. [0] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/440815/ On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 1:44 PM, Tim Bell wrote: > > For those that are interested in nested quotas, there is proposal on how > to address this forming in openstack-dev (and

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] [elections] Available time and top priority

2017-04-10 Thread Monty Taylor
On 04/10/2017 01:52 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: On 4/10/2017 1:18 PM, Chris Dent wrote: On Mon, 10 Apr 2017, Thierry Carrez wrote: So my question is the following: if elected, how much time do you think you'll be able to dedicate to Technical Committee affairs (reviewing proposed changes and

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] [elections] Available time and top priority

2017-04-10 Thread Dean Troyer
On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 1:52 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: > How will the TC grow a diverse membership if it's not even held, at least > every other week, in a timezone where the other half of the world can > attend? This is something we do need to sort out. The experiences I

Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon][nova][tc] nova-network deprecation in horizon

2017-04-10 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 4/10/2017 11:14 AM, Monty Taylor wrote: On 04/10/2017 10:37 AM, Monty Taylor wrote: On 04/10/2017 09:19 AM, Dean Troyer wrote: On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 8:58 AM, Akihiro Motoki wrote: (question not directly related to this topic) I am not sure there is a case where users

Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon][nova][tc] nova-network deprecation in horizon

2017-04-10 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 4/10/2017 1:51 PM, Dean Troyer wrote: On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 10:19 AM, Matt Riedemann wrote: How long are we expected to be carrying this deprecated bridge code? If you need these CLIs/API bindings in the client, then don't upgrade to 8.0.0, or run different versions

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] [elections] Available time and top priority

2017-04-10 Thread German Eichberger
Agreed but not only for the TC. I also heard privately from some contributors that meetings times prevent them from fully engage with a project. This is something where we as the TC can lead by example. German On 4/10/17, 3:06 PM, "Davanum Srinivas" wrote: Matt,

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] [elections] Available time and top priority

2017-04-10 Thread Edward Leafe
On Apr 10, 2017, at 1:52 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: > > How will the TC grow a diverse membership if it's not even held, at least > every other week, in a timezone where the other half of the world can attend? +1 --

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] [elections] Available time and top priority

2017-04-10 Thread Davanum Srinivas
Matt, I second this request. At least one person i talked to, pointed this as a primary reason for not standing for the TC election. Thanks, Dims On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 2:52 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: > On 4/10/2017 1:18 PM, Chris Dent wrote: >> >> On Mon, 10 Apr 2017,

Re: [openstack-dev] [qa][cinder] critical fix for ceph job

2017-04-10 Thread Jon Bernard
* Matt Riedemann wrote: > On 4/7/2017 9:43 AM, Jordan Pittier wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 4:15 PM, Ghanshyam Mann > > wrote: > > > > Thanks. I am not sure these kind of driver specific behavior on

[openstack-dev] UC Meeting 04/10/17 Cancelled

2017-04-10 Thread Melvin Hillsman
Hey everyone, Apologies for the late notice. We are cancelling the meeting today. We have moved to a weekly cadence with meetings being subject to new agenda items having to be proposed/added by the Friday before the meeting. In other words, for UC meeting scheduled for 04/17/17 agenda items will

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] [elections] Available time and top priority

2017-04-10 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 4/10/2017 1:18 PM, Chris Dent wrote: On Mon, 10 Apr 2017, Thierry Carrez wrote: So my question is the following: if elected, how much time do you think you'll be able to dedicate to Technical Committee affairs (reviewing proposed changes and pushing your own) ? I've been regularly

Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon][nova][tc] nova-network deprecation in horizon

2017-04-10 Thread Dean Troyer
On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 10:19 AM, Matt Riedemann wrote: > How long are we expected to be carrying this deprecated bridge code? If you > need these CLIs/API bindings in the client, then don't upgrade to 8.0.0, or > run different versions of novaclient in venvs or containers if

[openstack-dev] [ironic] this week's priorities and subteam reports

2017-04-10 Thread Yeleswarapu, Ramamani
Hi, We are pleased to present this week's priorities and subteam report for Ironic. As usual, this is pulled directly from the Ironic whiteboard[0] and formatted. This Week's Priorities (as of the weekly ironic meeting) 1. rolling

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] [elections] Available time and top priority

2017-04-10 Thread Ed Leafe
On Apr 10, 2017, at 4:16 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: > So my question is the following: if elected, how much time do you think > you'll be able to dedicate to Technical Committee affairs (reviewing > proposed changes and pushing your own) ? Well, as you know I have been

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] [elections] Available time and top priority

2017-04-10 Thread German Eichberger
Hi, I am well aware that being on the TC is a serious time commitment and that there is more to do than a given day has hours. So I read your question more about prioritizing and how I would do that. A fair part of how I prioritize depends on input from others. That’s why I said listening to

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] [elections] Available time and top priority

2017-04-10 Thread Chris Dent
On Mon, 10 Apr 2017, Thierry Carrez wrote: So my question is the following: if elected, how much time do you think you'll be able to dedicate to Technical Committee affairs (reviewing proposed changes and pushing your own) ? I've been regularly reviewing changes in the governance repo and

[openstack-dev] [os-upstream-institute] Meeting Reminder

2017-04-10 Thread Kendall Nelson
Hello! Just wanted to remind everyone of our meeting today at 20:00 UTC in #openstack-meeting-3 Please feel free to add items to the agenda: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/openstack-upstream-institute-meetings Also, please take a look at the slides so we can focus on improvements rather than

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo][manila] Ganesha deployment

2017-04-10 Thread Ben Nemec
I'm not really an expert on composable roles so I'll leave that to someone else, but see my thoughts inline on the networking aspect. On 04/10/2017 03:22 AM, Jan Provaznik wrote: 2) define a new VIP (for IP failover) and 2 networks for NfsStorage role: a) a frontend network between users

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] [elections] Available time and top priority

2017-04-10 Thread Dean Troyer
On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 4:16 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: > So my question is the following: if elected, how much time do you think > you'll be able to dedicate to Technical Committee affairs (reviewing > proposed changes and pushing your own) ? If there was ONE thing, one >

[openstack-dev] [horizon] Unknown provider resource-type-registry.service test error

2017-04-10 Thread Beth Elwell
Hi all, Thanks very much in advance for any help you are able to offer. I have been working on developing the QoS Policies panel for horizon and have the panel working, however I am struggling with the qos.service.spec.js file. In advance of going into my findings and issues so far, the

[openstack-dev] [HA] HA Discussion at Boston Forum

2017-04-10 Thread Sam P
Hi All, I proposed a session [1] to Boston Forum and it is now at incomplete state. This is good opportunity for all of us to get together and discuss our HA related issues. I need your help to reform this session. Please put comments on [1] or replay to this with your comments. [1]

Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon][nova][tc] nova-network deprecation in horizon

2017-04-10 Thread Monty Taylor
On 04/10/2017 10:23 AM, Akihiro Motoki wrote: 2017-04-10 23:19 GMT+09:00 Dean Troyer : On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 8:58 AM, Akihiro Motoki wrote: (question not directly related to this topic) I am not sure there is a case where users still use API 2.36 for

Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon][nova][tc] nova-network deprecation in horizon

2017-04-10 Thread Monty Taylor
On 04/10/2017 10:24 AM, Sean Dague wrote: On 04/10/2017 11:19 AM, Matt Riedemann wrote: On 4/10/2017 9:19 AM, Dean Troyer wrote: On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 8:58 AM, Akihiro Motoki wrote: (question not directly related to this topic) I am not sure there is a case where users

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra] is it ok to create extra users with sudo permissions during devstack run

2017-04-10 Thread Pavlo Shchelokovskyy
Clark, thanks for reply. On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 6:49 PM, Clark Boylan wrote: > On Mon, Apr 10, 2017, at 08:31 AM, Pavlo Shchelokovskyy wrote: > > Hi infra team, > > > > on order to test a piece of functionality I am developing, during the > > devstack plugin run I need

Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon][nova][tc] nova-network deprecation in horizon

2017-04-10 Thread Monty Taylor
On 04/10/2017 10:37 AM, Monty Taylor wrote: On 04/10/2017 09:19 AM, Dean Troyer wrote: On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 8:58 AM, Akihiro Motoki wrote: (question not directly related to this topic) I am not sure there is a case where users still use API 2.36 for network management

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra] is it ok to create extra users with sudo permissions during devstack run

2017-04-10 Thread Clark Boylan
On Mon, Apr 10, 2017, at 08:31 AM, Pavlo Shchelokovskyy wrote: > Hi infra team, > > on order to test a piece of functionality I am developing, during the > devstack plugin run I need to create an extra user with password-less > sudo > permissions. As I am not sure of intricacies of our infra

[openstack-dev] [puppet] Meeting April 11, 2017 @1500 UTC

2017-04-10 Thread Alex Schultz
Just a reminder, we have a meeting scheduled tomorrow April 11, 2017 @1500UTC[0]. Please add something to the agenda[1] if you have something you would like to talk about. Thanks, -Alex [0] https://docs.openstack.org/developer/puppet-openstack-guide/meetings.html [1]

Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon][nova][tc] nova-network deprecation in horizon

2017-04-10 Thread Monty Taylor
On 04/10/2017 09:19 AM, Dean Troyer wrote: On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 8:58 AM, Akihiro Motoki wrote: (question not directly related to this topic) I am not sure there is a case where users still use API 2.36 for network management and newer API versions for other compute

[openstack-dev] [infra] is it ok to create extra users with sudo permissions during devstack run

2017-04-10 Thread Pavlo Shchelokovskyy
Hi infra team, on order to test a piece of functionality I am developing, during the devstack plugin run I need to create an extra user with password-less sudo permissions. As I am not sure of intricacies of our infra setup, I'd like to clarify if it is acceptable. TL;DR There is

Re: [openstack-dev] Boston Forum Schedule

2017-04-10 Thread Thiago da Silva
Looks like " Swift cluster level metrics and analytics" is also scheduled twice. Thiago > On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 11:03 AM, Tom Fifield wrote: > On 10/04/17 22:19, Emilien Macchi wrote: > >> On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 7:31 AM, Flavio Percoco >> wrote: >>

Re: [openstack-dev] Boston Forum Schedule

2017-04-10 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 4/10/2017 4:35 AM, Tom Fifield wrote: Hi everyone, Thank you for the many excellent topics submitted for our first Forum. We have updated the topic submission site with the status of each - please check yours. Please also find attached in PDF the proposed schedule for the Forum in Boston.

Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon][nova][tc] nova-network deprecation in horizon

2017-04-10 Thread Sean Dague
On 04/10/2017 11:19 AM, Matt Riedemann wrote: > On 4/10/2017 9:19 AM, Dean Troyer wrote: >> On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 8:58 AM, Akihiro Motoki >> wrote: >>> (question not directly related to this topic) >>> I am not sure there is a case where users still use API 2.36 for >>>

Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon][nova][tc] nova-network deprecation in horizon

2017-04-10 Thread Akihiro Motoki
2017-04-10 23:19 GMT+09:00 Dean Troyer : > On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 8:58 AM, Akihiro Motoki wrote: >> (question not directly related to this topic) >> I am not sure there is a case where users still use API 2.36 for >> network management >> and newer API

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][sfc][fwaas][taas][horizon] where would we like to have horizon dashboard for neutron stadium projects?

2017-04-10 Thread Doug Hellmann
Excerpts from Akihiro Motoki's message of 2017-04-11 00:09:10 +0900: > Hi neutrinos (and horizoners), > > As the title says, where would we like to have horizon dashboard for > neutron stadium projects? > There are several projects under neutron stadium and they are trying > to add dashboard

Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon][nova][tc] nova-network deprecation in horizon

2017-04-10 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 4/10/2017 9:19 AM, Dean Troyer wrote: On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 8:58 AM, Akihiro Motoki wrote: (question not directly related to this topic) I am not sure there is a case where users still use API 2.36 for network management and newer API versions for other compute

Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon][nova][tc] nova-network deprecation in horizon

2017-04-10 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 4/10/2017 8:58 AM, Akihiro Motoki wrote: Is there any deprecation policy in novaclient python binding? I was not aware of deprecation warnings. If novaclient follows nova deprecation, it sounds reasonable to me. Yes we deprecated the CLIs in this change in Newton:

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo][ui] another i18n proposal for heat templates 'description' help strings

2017-04-10 Thread Julie Pichon
Hi Peng, I added some thoughts in-line, let me know what you think. On 10 April 2017 at 08:10, Peng Wu wrote: > Hi, > > In TripleO UI project users requested translation of the web UI. But > some web UI strings are displayed from heat template files in tripleo- >

[openstack-dev] [neutron][sfc][fwaas][taas][horizon] where would we like to have horizon dashboard for neutron stadium projects?

2017-04-10 Thread Akihiro Motoki
Hi neutrinos (and horizoners), As the title says, where would we like to have horizon dashboard for neutron stadium projects? There are several projects under neutron stadium and they are trying to add dashboard support. I would like to raise this topic again. No dashboard support lands since

Re: [openstack-dev] Boston Forum Schedule

2017-04-10 Thread Tom Fifield
On 10/04/17 22:19, Emilien Macchi wrote: On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 7:31 AM, Flavio Percoco wrote: On 10/04/17 17:35 +0800, Tom Fifield wrote: Hi everyone, Thank you for the many excellent topics submitted for our first Forum. We have updated the topic submission site with

Re: [openstack-dev] [Keystone][Token expiration]

2017-04-10 Thread lương hữu tuấn
Thanks Dolph, I now have a pretty clear picture about it. Br, Tuan/Nokia On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 2:58 PM, Dolph Mathews wrote: > The token itself is still expired, regardless of where it's persisted, if > at all. Expired tokens are only considered valid when

Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon][nova][tc] nova-network deprecation in horizon

2017-04-10 Thread Dean Troyer
On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 8:58 AM, Akihiro Motoki wrote: > (question not directly related to this topic) > I am not sure there is a case where users still use API 2.36 for > network management > and newer API versions for other compute operation. This is probably true for

Re: [openstack-dev] Boston Forum Schedule

2017-04-10 Thread Emilien Macchi
On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 7:31 AM, Flavio Percoco wrote: > On 10/04/17 17:35 +0800, Tom Fifield wrote: >> >> Hi everyone, >> >> Thank you for the many excellent topics submitted for our first Forum. We >> have updated the topic submission site with the status of each - please >>

Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon][nova][tc] nova-network deprecation in horizon

2017-04-10 Thread Akihiro Motoki
I am okay to drop nova-network feature in Pike. More generally, can we horizon team say the following? A feature deprecated in a back-end project is automatically deprecated in Horizon and a feature in horizon will be dropped if a corresponding support is dropped in a back-end project and/or

Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon][nova][tc] nova-network deprecation in horizon

2017-04-10 Thread Akihiro Motoki
2017-03-29 5:06 GMT+09:00 Matt Riedemann : > On 3/28/2017 9:04 AM, Akihiro Motoki wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I would like to raise a topic when horizon nova-network support can be >> dropped. >> I added [tc] tag as it is related to >> "assert:follows-standard-deprecation" tag in

Re: [openstack-dev] Boston Forum Schedule

2017-04-10 Thread Thierry Carrez
David Medberry wrote: > Are the three rooms roughly the same size? 102 and 103 are slightly larger than 104. Cheers, -- Thierry Carrez (ttx) __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe:

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] [elections] Available time and top priority

2017-04-10 Thread Amrith Kumar
> -Original Message- > From: Thierry Carrez [mailto:thie...@openstack.org] > Sent: Monday, April 10, 2017 5:17 AM > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List > Subject: [openstack-dev] [tc] [elections] Available time and top priority > > Hi everyone, > >

Re: [openstack-dev] Boston Forum Schedule

2017-04-10 Thread David Medberry
Are the three rooms roughly the same size? On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 3:35 AM, Tom Fifield wrote: > Hi everyone, > > Thank you for the many excellent topics submitted for our first Forum. We > have updated the topic submission site with the status of each - please > check

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo][kolla] extended start and hostpath persistent dirs

2017-04-10 Thread Jiří Stránský
Responses inline :) I started snipping parts out because the quotations are getting long. tl;dr use kolla images and bootsrap OR upstream images with direct commands: .. code-block:: yaml kolla_config: /var/lib/kolla/config_files/foo.json command: /usr/bin/foo We insist on using

Re: [openstack-dev] [Keystone][Token expiration]

2017-04-10 Thread Dolph Mathews
The token itself is still expired, regardless of where it's persisted, if at all. Expired tokens are only considered valid when presented as an X-Auth-Token to keystonemiddleware.auth_token along with a valid X-Service-Token, or when validating an X-Subject-Token against keystone directly using

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] allow_instance_snapshots config option is not used consistently

2017-04-10 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 4/10/2017 5:20 AM, sfinu...@redhat.com wrote: On Mon, 2017-04-10 at 10:24 +0100, John Garbutt wrote: On 10 April 2017 at 01:56, Matt Riedemann wrote: I found a fun little legacy nugget of compute API non- interoperability joy tonight. The "allow_instance_snapshots"

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] Tags for volumes

2017-04-10 Thread Duncan Thomas
You can deploy Searchlight (https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Searchlight) and it can handle this and more complex metadata querying (it is backed by elastic search and supports all of the expressive power of elastic search queries). There's a limit to how much query functionality can go into a

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] [elections] Available time and top priority

2017-04-10 Thread Flavio Percoco
On 10/04/17 11:16 +0200, Thierry Carrez wrote: Hi everyone, New in this TC election round, we have a few days between nominations and actual voting to ask questions and get to know the candidates a bit better. I'd like to kick off this new "campaigning period" with a basic question on available

Re: [openstack-dev] Boston Forum Schedule

2017-04-10 Thread Flavio Percoco
On 10/04/17 17:35 +0800, Tom Fifield wrote: Hi everyone, Thank you for the many excellent topics submitted for our first Forum. We have updated the topic submission site with the status of each - please check yours. Please also find attached in PDF the proposed schedule for the Forum in

[openstack-dev] Reminder User Committee Meeting

2017-04-10 Thread Melvin Hillsman
Hey everyone, User Committee will meet today in #openstack-meeting @ 1900UTC. If you have any requests for agenda items you can reply to this email or message any of the UC members via email as well as IRC - #openstack-uc -- Kind regards, OpenStack UC

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic][nova] Suggestion required on pci_device inventory addition to ironic and its subsequent changes in nova

2017-04-10 Thread John Garbutt
On 10 April 2017 at 11:31, wrote: > On Mon, 2017-04-10 at 11:50 +0530, Nisha Agarwal wrote: >> Hi team, >> >> Please could you pour in your suggestions on the mail? >> >> I raised a blueprint in Nova for this https://blueprints.launchpad.ne >>

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo][kolla] extended start and hostpath persistent dirs

2017-04-10 Thread Bogdan Dobrelya
Dan, Martin, Jiri, and all folks, how could we make a final call for this please? The decision impacts code review for new patches, like redis [0] or etcd [1] [0] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/442151/ [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/447627/ As I see (suggest) it: On 04.04.2017 22:53,

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] [elections] Available time and top priority

2017-04-10 Thread Davanum Srinivas
Thierry, Team, On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 5:16 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: > Hi everyone, > > New in this TC election round, we have a few days between nominations > and actual voting to ask questions and get to know the candidates a bit > better. I'd like to kick off this new

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic][nova] Suggestion required on pci_device inventory addition to ironic and its subsequent changes in nova

2017-04-10 Thread sfinucan
On Mon, 2017-04-10 at 11:50 +0530, Nisha Agarwal wrote: > Hi team, > > Please could you pour in your suggestions on the mail? > > I raised a blueprint in Nova for this https://blueprints.launchpad.ne > t/nova/+spec/pci-passthorugh-for-ironic and two RFEs at ironic side h >

[openstack-dev] [nova] notification update week 14

2017-04-10 Thread Balazs Gibizer
Hi, Here is the status update / focus setting mail about notification work for week 14. Bugs [Medium] https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1657428 The instance notifications are sent with inconsistent timestamp format. Fix seems abandoned by the original author so I will update it soon to

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] allow_instance_snapshots config option is not used consistently

2017-04-10 Thread sfinucan
On Mon, 2017-04-10 at 10:24 +0100, John Garbutt wrote: > On 10 April 2017 at 01:56, Matt Riedemann > wrote: > > I found a fun little legacy nugget of compute API non- > > interoperability joy > > tonight. > > > > The "allow_instance_snapshots" config option disables the > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] [elections] Available time and top priority

2017-04-10 Thread John Garbutt
On 10 April 2017 at 10:16, Thierry Carrez wrote: > All the candidates are top community members with a lot of > responsibilities on their shoulders already. My experience tells me that > it is easy to overestimate the time we can dedicate to Technical > Committee matters,

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] Tags for volumes

2017-04-10 Thread 王玺源
We have an user demand that volumes should be filtered by some operation with metadata(or tag): 1. key1=value1 2. key1=value1 and key2=value2 3. key1=value1 or key1=value2 4. key1=value1 or key2=value2 5. not key1=value1 6. not key1=value1 and not key1=value2 7. not key1=value1 and not key2=value2

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra][docker] registry-1.docker.io to reverse proxy cache

2017-04-10 Thread Flavio Percoco
On 08/04/17 10:44 -0400, Paul Belanger wrote: On Fri, Apr 07, 2017 at 12:15:49PM -0400, Paul Belanger wrote: Greetings, In an effort to help projects depending on docker infrastructure, we've setup a reverse proxy cache for http://registry-1.docker.io. Please see the instructions in 453811[1]

[openstack-dev] Boston Forum Schedule

2017-04-10 Thread Tom Fifield
Hi everyone, Thank you for the many excellent topics submitted for our first Forum. We have updated the topic submission site with the status of each - please check yours. Please also find attached in PDF the proposed schedule for the Forum in Boston. Let us know if you see major issues

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] allow_instance_snapshots config option is not used consistently

2017-04-10 Thread John Garbutt
On 10 April 2017 at 01:56, Matt Riedemann wrote: > I found a fun little legacy nugget of compute API non-interoperability joy > tonight. > > The "allow_instance_snapshots" config option disables the createImage server > action API. Completely config driven and therefore not

[openstack-dev] [tc] [elections] Available time and top priority

2017-04-10 Thread Thierry Carrez
Hi everyone, New in this TC election round, we have a few days between nominations and actual voting to ask questions and get to know the candidates a bit better. I'd like to kick off this new "campaigning period" with a basic question on available time and top priority. All the candidates are

[openstack-dev] [mistral] Team meeting - 04/10/2017

2017-04-10 Thread Ренат Ахмеров
Hi, I’d like to invite Mistral team members to our weekly team meeting today at #openstack-meeting-3 at 15.00 UTC. Agenda: • Review action items • Current status (progress, issues, roadblocks, further plans) • Sync on Pike 1 progress • Setting up project goals for 2017 • Open discussion

[openstack-dev] [kuryr] Weekly IRC meeting today April 10th is cancelled

2017-04-10 Thread Antoni Segura Puimedon
Hi Kuryrs, I'm on PTO on the mountains with limited connectivity, hence I won't be able to make it to the weekly IRC meeting. Regards and sorry for the short notice, Toni __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for

[openstack-dev] [tripleo][manila] Ganesha deployment

2017-04-10 Thread Jan Provaznik
Hi, TripleO currently supports deploying CephFS and it can be used as a backend for Manila service, so user can mount ceph shares by using either ceph kernel driver or ceph-fuse on his side. There is an ongoing ganesha-nfs project [1] which can be used as a proxy when accessing CephFS. The

[openstack-dev] [tripleo][ui] another i18n proposal for heat templates 'description' help strings

2017-04-10 Thread Peng Wu
Hi,   In TripleO UI project users requested translation of the web UI. But some web UI strings are displayed from heat template files in tripleo- heat-templates project.   In order to get translated templates displayed in tripleo-ui, we propose another solution as follows, which needs to change

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic][nova] Suggestion required on pci_device inventory addition to ironic and its subsequent changes in nova

2017-04-10 Thread Nisha Agarwal
Hi team, Please could you pour in your suggestions on the mail? I raised a blueprint in Nova for this https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/pci-passthorugh-for-ironic and two RFEs at ironic side https://bugs.launchpad.net/ironic/+bug/1680780 and