On Sun, Jul 23, 2017 at 6:10 PM, Jay Pipes wrote:
> Glad you brought this up, Mike. I was going to start a thread about this.
> Comments inline.
>
> On 07/23/2017 05:02 PM, Michael Bayer wrote:
> Well, besides that point (which I agree with), that is attempting to change
> an
If I understand the main issue with using regular callbacks, it's mainly
just that the flavor assignment itself is in a callback, right?
If so, couldn't we solve the problem by just moving flavor assignment to an
explicit call before emitting the callbacks? Or would that still result in
other
Glad you brought this up, Mike. I was going to start a thread about
this. Comments inline.
On 07/23/2017 05:02 PM, Michael Bayer wrote:
I've been working with Octave Oregon in assisting with new rules and
datatypes that would allow projects to support the NDB storage engine
with MySQL.
To
Yeah, the networking guide does include configuration for some of the
sub-projects (e.g. BGP is at [1]). For the remaining ones there is work
that needs to be done because their docs live in wiki pages.
1.
https://docs.openstack.org/ocata/networking-guide/config-bgp-dynamic-routing.html
On Sun,
I've been working with Octave Oregon in assisting with new rules and
datatypes that would allow projects to support the NDB storage engine
with MySQL.
To that end, we've made changes to oslo.db in [1] to support this, and
there are now a bunch of proposals such as [2] [3] to implement new
On Sat, Jul 22, 2017 at 12:13 PM, Akihiro Motoki wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a question on admin/ document related to the networking guide
> and would like to have advices from the documentation experts.
>
> It seems the check site by Doug expect all project have admin/ page.
> In
Hey list -
It appears that MariaDB as of version 10.2 has made an enhancement
that overall is great and fairly historic in the MySQL community,
they've made CHECK constraints finally work. For all of MySQL's
existence, you could emit a CREATE TABLE statement that included CHECK
constraint, but
Excerpts from Kevin Benton's message of 2017-07-23 01:31:25 -0700:
> Yeah, I was just thinking it makes it more explicit that we haven't just
> skipped doing an admin guide for a particular project.
Sure, you can do that. I don't think we want to link to all of those
pages from the list of admin
Hi,
(+openstack-dev for wider audience)
Please note that we are planning a 2 hour maintenance window where
review.rdoproject.org could be unavailable this next tuesday evening,
July 25th at 23:00 UTC.
We will proceed with an upgrade of the instance software and will
migrate the
I'm not able to chair the meeting tomorrow due to attend OpenStack Days
China event and we just issued the final releases of Oslo libraries for
Pike last week. It seems there is no urgent stuff to handle, sol let's skip
the meeting.
--
ChangBo Guo(gcb)
Yeah, I was just thinking it makes it more explicit that we haven't just
skipped doing an admin guide for a particular project.
On Sun, Jul 23, 2017 at 1:18 AM, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
> On 07/22/2017 11:44 PM, Kevin Benton wrote:
>
>> Could we just put a placeholder in those
On 07/22/2017 11:44 PM, Kevin Benton wrote:
Could we just put a placeholder in those subprojects /admin directories
that redirects to the networking guide?
You mean a single page that basically says :
All information is covered in the `Networking Guide
12 matches
Mail list logo