Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][cinder][glance] What should be the response for invalid 'Accpet' header?

Hi Sean, As per your suggestion, I have reported a bug in Launchpad. Please refer, https://bugs.launchpad.net/masakari/+bug/1714416 Thank you, Niraj From: Sean McGinnis [mailto:sean.mcgin...@gmx.com] Sent: 31 August 2017 20:47 To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Subject: Re: [openstack-dev]

Re: [openstack-dev] [QA] [Cinder] [Aodh] [Zaqar] [neutron-lbaas] [neutron-fwaas] [networking-bgpvpn] [ceilometer] [monasca-api] Removal of Old Deprecated data_utils from Temepst

Updates: Only nova-lxd is left to merge fix on their stable branches if needed. nova-lxd - Patch Up- https://review.openstack.org/#/q/I0a08bdfd304d988ca48fb07d901d3ecfd5968599,n,z As Pike is released and almost all plugins merged their fix. I have pushed the old data-utils removal from

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack] [charms] Openstack with OVN

Just to make sure you saw it - here is the manual installation doc to help guide you through what needs to be implemented in a project like this. https://docs.openstack.org/networking-ovn/latest/install/index.html On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 3:39 PM, Aakash Kt wrote: > Hi

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack] [charms] Openstack with OVN

Hi James, Thanks for the reply. This definitely cleared some thing up for me. I would love to get started on this charm soon, and will be sure to drop in weekly meeting or ask questions on IRC. Cheers, Aakash On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 1:56 PM, James Page wrote: > Hi

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Can we remove the monkey_patch_modules config option?

On 8/30/2017 1:16 PM, Lokesh Jain wrote: Hi Matt, Thank you for pointing this out and bringing this to my attention. We are using the monkey_patch options to add more nova capabilities. Specifically we are using it to replace Nova’s nova/network/neutronv2/api.get_port_vnic_info function for

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] PTG Agenda draft - action required

On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 10:27 AM, Emilien Macchi wrote: [...] > I'm preparing a Google Calendar today, so everyone can easily > understand the schedule. I prepared this public agenda:

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla] [cinder] [ironic] PTG cross-platform meetup possibility

Rich, I can make Monday at 4 pm work.  Conflicts with some Docs discussions but I can step out for a bit. Thanks! Jay On 8/31/2017 8:25 AM, Richard Wellum wrote: Hi, How does Monday at 4pm sound? Kolla already has a cross-platform discussion with Triple-O at 2pm, so this would dovetail

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] PTG Agenda draft - action required

I brought some changes in the schedule: - On Wednesday morning, we'll start at 9am and do a one hour retrospective to discuss what went wrong and good in Pike, and see how we can do better in Queens. Alex an I will animate this retro. - Which means, CI topics will be split in 2 times: from 10am

Re: [openstack-dev] [vitrage] Collectd - to - Vitrage setup issues

Hi Ifat, I actually have ‘debug = true’ in /etc/vitrage/vitrage.conf . However I don’t see vitrage-graph.log anywhere ? Where is it suppose to be ? in /var/log/ ? Greg. root@devstack-vitrage:/# more /etc/vitrage/vitrage.conf [DEFAULT] debug = True transport_url =

Re: [openstack-dev] Future Trove development

Amrith, See answers to your questions below. Cheers, Luke >> >> I understand that the Trove project will be going into maintenance mode >> soon. I have a number of Trove related enhancements and bug fixes that I >> would like to submit to the community, but I don't know if they would be >>

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO][CI] FreeIPA Deployment

Something that just came to my mind: Another option would be to allocate an extra IP Address for the undercloud, that would be dedicated to FreeIPA, and that way we MAY be able to deploy the FreeIPA server in the undercloud. If folks are OK with this I could experiment on this front. Maybe I could

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][cinder][glance] What should be the response for invalid 'Accpet' header?

Hey Niraj, That does seem to be incorrect behavior on the services side. It would be good to have a bug filed to track it. For now you could open one and flag each project as being affected. We may find that it requires a change in each project, or it may end up being a common oslo change.

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Should we add the 'force' option to the cold migrate API too?

On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 5:09 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: > Given the recent bugs [1][2] due to the force flag in the live migrate and > evacuate APIs related to Placement, and some other long standing bugs about > bypassing the scheduler [3], I don't think we should add the

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla] [cinder] [ironic] PTG cross-platform meetup possibility

Hi team, Monday at 4pm sounds great for me. I hope, it will work well both for Cinder and Kolla teams. Regards, Ivan Kolodyazhny, http://blog.e0ne.info/ On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 4:25 PM, Richard Wellum wrote: > Hi, > > How does Monday at 4pm sound? Kolla already has a

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Gate is broken - Do not approve any patch until further notice

On 30.8.2017 06:54, Emilien Macchi wrote: On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 4:17 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote: We are currently dealing with 4 issues and until they are fix, please do not approve any patch. We want to keep the gate clear to merge the fixes for the 4 problems first. 1)

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla] [cinder] [ironic] PTG cross-platform meetup possibility

Hi, How does Monday at 4pm sound? Kolla already has a cross-platform discussion with Triple-O at 2pm, so this would dovetail nicely. Thanks, ||Rich On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 2:48 PM Ivan Kolodyazhny wrote: > Hi team, > > I'm interested in cinder containerization too. It would

[openstack-dev] [docs] adopting whereto as official tool maintained by docs team

As part of the work for the doc-migration project this cycle, we have expanded the way we use redirects to allow project teams to have htaccess files in tree. Since redirects can be tricky to test without a live server, I put together a tool that we can use in CI to do some minimal validation. It

Re: [openstack-dev] [relmgt] Libraries published to pypi with YYYY.X.Z versions

On 2017-08-31 15:21:19 +1000 (+1000), Tony Breeds wrote: [...] > I assume it's infra that needs to do the actual unpublish? We're the ones with the most consistent access to all of them, though in a majority of cases there's at least one other account with sufficient access to do the same (it

Re: [openstack-dev] [docs] Updating the docs team mission statement

I have updated the mission statement as per Thierry’s suggestion (thank you, I liked that a lot!) See the review here: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/499556/ It is currently in WIP. Petr and I agree that the best place to discuss this will be at the PTG. On 8/22/17, 5:34 PM, "Doug

[openstack-dev] removing screen from devstack - RSN

The work that started last cycle to make devstack only have a single execution mode, that was the same between automated QA and local, is nearing it's completion. https://review.openstack.org/#/c/499186/ is the patch that will remove screen from devstack (which was only left as a fall back for

[openstack-dev] [openstack][ANNOUNCE][Stackube] v1.0 beta released

Hi all, We are excited to announce Stackube project is v1.0 beta released! Stackube blends Kubernetes and OpenStack to build Container-native IaaS [1]. Stackube uses Kubernetes, instead of Nova, as the compute fabric controller, to provision containers as the compute instance, along with other

[openstack-dev] [nova][cinder][glance] What should be the response for invalid 'Accpet' header?

Hi Devs, As of now, when user passes 'Accept' header in request other than JSON and XML using curl command then it returns 200 OK response with json format data. In api-ref guide [1] also it's not clearly mentioned about what response it should return if invalid value for 'Accept' header is

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Gate is broken - Do not approve any patch until further notice

On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 10:55:34AM +0200, Bogdan Dobrelya wrote: > On 31.08.2017 10:33, Michele Baldessari wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 11:31:14AM +0200, Bogdan Dobrelya wrote: > >> On 30.08.2017 6:54, Emilien Macchi wrote: > >>> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 4:17 PM, Emilien Macchi

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Gate is broken - Do not approve any patch until further notice

On 31.08.2017 10:33, Michele Baldessari wrote: > On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 11:31:14AM +0200, Bogdan Dobrelya wrote: >> On 30.08.2017 6:54, Emilien Macchi wrote: >>> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 4:17 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote: We are currently dealing with 4 issues and until they

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Gate is broken - Do not approve any patch until further notice

On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 11:31:14AM +0200, Bogdan Dobrelya wrote: > On 30.08.2017 6:54, Emilien Macchi wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 4:17 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote: > >> We are currently dealing with 4 issues and until they are fix, please > >> do not approve any patch. We

Re: [openstack-dev] [vitrage] Collectd - to - Vitrage setup issues

Hi Greg, First of all, let’s make sure that the notification is generated by collectd. To do so, create a simple collectd python plugin to dump notifications into /tmp/python-notifications.dump' file: cat > /etc/collectd_notification_dump.py < ModulePath "/etc" LogTraces

Re: [openstack-dev] [vitrage] Collectd - to - Vitrage setup issues

Hi Greg, Vitrage listens to Collectd notifications, not statistics. Can you please turn on the debug option in /etc/vitrage/vitrage.conf (set “debug = true”), and send me the vitrage-graph.log? Thanks, Ifat. From: "Waines, Greg" Date: Wednesday, 30 August 2017 at