Hi, thanks for the advice. Will take a look.
Regards
On Mon, Feb 19, 2018, 8:28 AM Matthias Runge wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 18, 2018 at 05:15:18AM -0600, Sean McGinnis wrote:
> > Hello kolla team,
> >
> > It looks like stable builds for kolla have been failing for some time
> now. Just forwarding th
On Sun, Feb 18, 2018 at 05:15:18AM -0600, Sean McGinnis wrote:
> Hello kolla team,
>
> It looks like stable builds for kolla have been failing for some time now.
> Just forwarding this on to make sure the team is aware of it before the need
> for a stable release comes up.
>
> > Build failed.
>
Could everybody import translations, please?
* for master so that you have translated releasenotes
* for stable/queens for the iminent Queens release. Note that this one
removes translated releasenotes, we only translate and publish
releasenotes from master.
Full list of open reviews:
https://rev
Just an FYI if you haven't seen the thread on openstack-dev.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Emilien Macchi
Date: Sun, Feb 18, 2018 at 7:25 PM
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [infra][all] New Zuul Depends-On syntax
To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" <
o
I just realized that the new syntax doesn't work when third party jobs use
an old version of Zuul (e.g. RDO RCI).
Which means:
Depends-On: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/542556/
doesn't work
and
Depends-On: Ia30965b362d1c05d216f59b4cc1b3cb7e1284046
works for third party jobs.
We have to be ver
On 2/1/2018 9:51 AM, Lance Bragstad wrote:
Just like with feature freeze, I put together a review dashboard that
contains patches we need to land in order to cut a release candidate
[0]. I'll be adding more patches throughout the day, but so far there
are 21 changes there waiting for review. If t
Thank you, Matt and everyone.
But I would like to become a core reviewer for the nova project as well
as python-novaclient.
I have contributed more in the nova project than python-novaclient.
I have done total 2,700+ reviews for the nova project in all releases (*1).
(Total 115 reviews only for
Excerpts from Jeremy Stanley's message of 2018-02-18 16:01:52 +:
> On 2018-02-18 03:55:51 -0600 (-0600), Monty Taylor wrote:
> [...]
> > I'd honestly argue in favor of assuming bash and using 'source'
> > because it's more readable. We don't make allowances for alternate
> > shells in our examp
This is an update on what has been achieved this week with the regard of
Containerized Undercloud efforts in TripleO:
TL;DR: really good efforts have been made and we can now deploy a full
(multinode) overcloud in CI. OVB testing in progress and lot of remaining
items!
## Bugfixes
docker-registry
On 2018-02-18 03:55:51 -0600 (-0600), Monty Taylor wrote:
[...]
> I'd honestly argue in favor of assuming bash and using 'source'
> because it's more readable. We don't make allowances for alternate
> shells in our examples anyway.
>
> I personally try to use 'source' vs . and $() vs. `` as
> aggr
Hello zaqar team,
It looks like stable jobs have been failing for some time now for zaqar stable
branches. Just forwarding on to make sure the team is aware of this.
Thanks,
Sean
> Begin forwarded message:
>
> From: "A mailing list for the OpenStack Stable Branch test reports."
>
> Subject:
Hello kolla team,
It looks like stable builds for kolla have been failing for some time now. Just
forwarding this on to make sure the team is aware of it before the need for a
stable release comes up.
Thanks,
Sean
> Begin forwarded message:
>
> From: "A mailing list for the OpenStack Stable B
On 02/17/2018 03:03 PM, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
On 2018-02-17 13:47:02 -0500 (-0500), Hongbin Lu wrote:
[...]
If anyone can clarify the rationals of this convention, it will be
really helpful.
[...]
There's a trade-off here: while `.` is standardized in POSIX sh
(under Utilities, Dot in the spec
13 matches
Mail list logo