[openstack-dev] [cyborg]No Meeting This Week

Hi team, Given that people still recover from the summit and memorial day holiday, let's cancel the team weekly meeting this week as well. At the mean time feel free to communicate over irc or email :) -- Zhipeng (Howard) Huang Standard Engineer IT Standard & Patent/IT Product Line Huawei

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] [placement] Upgrade concerns with nested Resource Providers

Hi, > Do I still understand correctly ? If yes, perfect, let's jump to my upgrade > concern. Yes, I think. The old microversions look into only root providers and give up providing resources if a root provider itself doesn't have enough inventories for requested resources. But the new

Re: [openstack-dev] [docs] Style guide for OpenStack documentation

On 2018-05-28 16:40:13 +0200 (+0200), Petr Kovar wrote: [...] > I'm all for openness but maintaining consistency is why style guides > matter. Switching to a different style guide would require the following: > > 1) agreeing on the right style guide, > 2) reviewing our current style guidelines in

Re: [openstack-dev] [docs] Style guide for OpenStack documentation

On 28 May 2018 at 15:40, Petr Kovar wrote: > On Thu, 17 May 2018 15:03:23 + > Jeremy Stanley wrote: > > > On 2018-05-17 16:35:36 +0200 (+0200), Petr Kovar wrote: > ​%<- ​ > I'm all for openness but maintaining consistency is why style guides >

Re: [openstack-dev] [docs] Style guide for OpenStack documentation

On Thu, 17 May 2018 15:03:23 + Jeremy Stanley wrote: > On 2018-05-17 16:35:36 +0200 (+0200), Petr Kovar wrote: > > On Wed, 16 May 2018 17:05:15 + > > Jeremy Stanley wrote: > > > > > On 2018-05-16 18:24:45 +0200 (+0200), Petr Kovar wrote: > > >

[openstack-dev] [nova] [placement] Upgrade concerns with nested Resource Providers

Hi, I already told about that in a separate thread, but let's put it here too for more visibility. tl;dr: I suspect existing allocations are being lost when we upgrade a compute service from Queens to Rocky, if those allocations are made against inventories that are now provided by a child

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] [nova] Need some feedback on the proposed heal_allocations CLI

On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 12:19 AM, Matt Riedemann wrote: > I've written a nova-manage placement heal_allocations CLI [1] which was a > TODO from the PTG in Dublin as a step toward getting existing > CachingScheduler users to roll off that (which is deprecated). > > During the

Re: [openstack-dev] [ci][infra][tripleo] Multi-staged check pipelines for Zuul v3 proposal

On 5/28/18 11:43 AM, Bogdan Dobrelya wrote: On 5/25/18 6:40 PM, Tristan Cacqueray wrote: Hello Bogdan, Perhaps this has something to do with jobs evaluation order, it may be worth trying to add the dependencies list in the project-templates, like it is done here for example:

Re: [openstack-dev] [ci][infra][tripleo] Multi-staged check pipelines for Zuul v3 proposal

On 5/25/18 6:40 PM, Tristan Cacqueray wrote: Hello Bogdan, Perhaps this has something to do with jobs evaluation order, it may be worth trying to add the dependencies list in the project-templates, like it is done here for example:

Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon] Font awesome currently broken with Debian Sid and Horizon

I did a quick search for all the glyphs we are using: ~/dev/horizon(master)> ag 'fa-' | egrep -o 'fa-[a-z-]*' | sort | uniq fa- fa-angle-left fa-angle-right fa-arrow-down fa-arrow-up fa-asterisk fa-b fa-bars fa-bolt fa-bug fa-calculator fa-calendar fa-caret-down fa-caret-up fa-check