Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] EOL process for newton branches

2018-07-18 Thread Tony Breeds
On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 08:08:16PM -0400, Emilien Macchi wrote: > Option 2, EOL everything. > Thanks a lot for your help on this one, Tony. No problem. I've created: https://review.openstack.org/583856 to tag final releases for tripleo deliverables and then mark them as EOL. Once that merges

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][cinder][neutron][qa] Should we add a tempest-slow job?

2018-07-18 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
> On Sun, May 13, 2018 at 1:20 PM, Ghanshyam Mann > wrote: > > On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 10:45 PM, Matt Riedemann > > wrote: > >> The tempest-full job used to run API and scenario tests concurrently, and > >> if > >> you go back far enough I think it also ran slow tests. > >> > >>

[openstack-dev] [octavia] Make amphora-agent support http rest api

2018-07-18 Thread Jeff Yang
In some private cloud environments, the possibility of vm being attacked is very small, and all personnel are trusted. At this time, the administrator hopes to reduce the complexity of octavia deployment and operation and maintenance. We can let the amphora-agent provide the http api so that the

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Bug 1781710 killing the check queue

2018-07-18 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 7/18/2018 5:58 PM, w...@seanmooney.info wrote: general update. i spent some time this afternoon debuging matt's regression test https://review.openstack.org/#/c/583339 and it now works as intended with the addtion of disableing the late check on the compute node in the regression test to

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] EOL process for newton branches

2018-07-18 Thread Emilien Macchi
Option 2, EOL everything. Thanks a lot for your help on this one, Tony. --- Emilien Macchi On Wed, Jul 18, 2018, 7:47 PM Tony Breeds, wrote: > > Hi All, > As of I3671f10d5a2fef0e91510a40835de962637f16e5 we have meta-data in > openstack/releases that tells us that the following repos are at

[openstack-dev] [tripleo] EOL process for newton branches

2018-07-18 Thread Tony Breeds
Hi All, As of I3671f10d5a2fef0e91510a40835de962637f16e5 we have meta-data in openstack/releases that tells us that the following repos are at newton-eol: - openstack/instack-undercloud - openstack/os-net-config - openstack/puppet-tripleo - openstack/tripleo-common -

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Bug 1781710 killing the check queue

2018-07-18 Thread Chris Friesen
On 07/18/2018 03:43 PM, melanie witt wrote: On Wed, 18 Jul 2018 15:14:55 -0500, Matt Riedemann wrote: On 7/18/2018 1:13 PM, melanie witt wrote: Can we get rid of multi-create? It keeps causing complications, and it already has weird behaviour if you ask for min_count=X and max_count=Y and

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Bug 1781710 killing the check queue

2018-07-18 Thread work
On Wed, 2018-07-18 at 15:14 -0500, Matt Riedemann wrote: > On 7/18/2018 1:13 PM, melanie witt wrote: > > > > > > Can we get rid of multi-create? It keeps causing complications, > > > and > > > it already > > > has weird behaviour if you ask for min_count=X and max_count=Y > > > and only X > > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Bug 1781710 killing the check queue

2018-07-18 Thread melanie witt
On Wed, 18 Jul 2018 15:14:55 -0500, Matt Riedemann wrote: On 7/18/2018 1:13 PM, melanie witt wrote: Can we get rid of multi-create?  It keeps causing complications, and it already has weird behaviour if you ask for min_count=X and max_count=Y and only X instances can be scheduled.  (Currently

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Stein blueprint - Plan to remove Keepalived support (replaced by Pacemaker)

2018-07-18 Thread Michele Baldessari
On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 11:07:04AM -0400, Dan Prince wrote: > On Tue, 2018-07-17 at 22:00 +0200, Michele Baldessari wrote: > > Hi Jarda, > > > > thanks for these perspectives, this is very valuable! > > > > On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 06:01:21PM +0200, Jaromir Coufal wrote: > > > Not rooting for any

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Bug 1781710 killing the check queue

2018-07-18 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 7/18/2018 1:13 PM, melanie witt wrote: Can we get rid of multi-create?  It keeps causing complications, and it already has weird behaviour if you ask for min_count=X and max_count=Y and only X instances can be scheduled.  (Currently it fails with NoValidHost, but it should arguably start

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Stein blueprint - Plan to remove Keepalived support (replaced by Pacemaker)

2018-07-18 Thread Emilien Macchi
Thanks everyone for this useful feedback (I guess it helps a lot to discuss before the PTG, so we don't even need to spend too much time on this topic). 1) Everyone agrees that undercloud HA isn't something we target now, therefore we won't switch to Pacemaker by default. 2) Pacemaker would still

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] Keystone Team Update - Week of 9 July 2018

2018-07-18 Thread Lance Bragstad
On 07/13/2018 01:33 PM, Colleen Murphy wrote: > # Keystone Team Update - Week of 9 July 2018 > > ## News > > ### New Core Reviewer > > We added a new core reviewer[1]: thanks to XiYuan for stepping up to take > this responsibility and for all your hard work on keystone! > > [1]

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Bug 1781710 killing the check queue

2018-07-18 Thread melanie witt
On Wed, 18 Jul 2018 12:05:13 -0600, Chris Friesen wrote: On 07/18/2018 10:14 AM, Matt Riedemann wrote: As can be seen from logstash [1] this bug is hurting us pretty bad in the check queue. I thought I originally had this fixed with [2] but that turned out to only be part of the issue. I

Re: [openstack-dev] OpenStack lagging behind 2 major python versions: we need a Python 3.7 gate

2018-07-18 Thread Clark Boylan
On Thu, Jul 12, 2018, at 1:38 PM, Thomas Goirand wrote: > Hi everyone! > > It's yet another of these emails where I'm going to complain out of > frustration because of OpenStack having bugs when running with the > newest stuff... Sorry in advance ! :) > > tl;dr: It's urgent, we need Python 3.7

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Bug 1781710 killing the check queue

2018-07-18 Thread Chris Friesen
On 07/18/2018 10:14 AM, Matt Riedemann wrote: As can be seen from logstash [1] this bug is hurting us pretty bad in the check queue. I thought I originally had this fixed with [2] but that turned out to only be part of the issue. I think I've identified the problem but I have failed to write a

Re: [openstack-dev] OpenStack lagging behind 2 major python versions: we need a Python 3.7 gate

2018-07-18 Thread Jay Pipes
On 07/18/2018 12:42 AM, Ian Wienand wrote: The ideal is that a (say) Neutron dev gets a clear traceback from a standard Python error in their change and happily fixes it. The reality is probably more like this developer gets a tempest failure due to nova failing to boot a cirros image, stemming

[openstack-dev] [nova] Bug 1781710 killing the check queue

2018-07-18 Thread Matt Riedemann
As can be seen from logstash [1] this bug is hurting us pretty bad in the check queue. I thought I originally had this fixed with [2] but that turned out to only be part of the issue. I think I've identified the problem but I have failed to write a recreate regression test [3] because (I

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder][nova] Proper behavior for os-force_detach

2018-07-18 Thread Walter Boring
The whole purpose of this test is to simulate the case where Nova doesn't know where the vm is anymore, or may simply not exist, but we need to clean up the cinder side of things. That being said, with the new attach API, the connector is being saved in the cinder database for each volume

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Stein blueprint - Plan to remove Keepalived support (replaced by Pacemaker)

2018-07-18 Thread Dan Prince
On Tue, 2018-07-17 at 22:00 +0200, Michele Baldessari wrote: > Hi Jarda, > > thanks for these perspectives, this is very valuable! > > On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 06:01:21PM +0200, Jaromir Coufal wrote: > > Not rooting for any approach here, just want to add a bit of > > factors which might play a

[openstack-dev] [publiccloud-wg] Meeting tomorrow for Public Cloud WG

2018-07-18 Thread Tobias Rydberg
Hi folks, Time for a new meeting for the Public Cloud WG. Agenda draft can be found at https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/publiccloud-wg, feel free to add items to that list. See you all tomorrow at IRC 1400 UTC in #openstack-publiccloud Cheers, Tobias -- Tobias Rydberg Senior Developer

[openstack-dev] [nova]API update week 12-18

2018-07-18 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
Hi All, Please find the Nova API highlights of this week. Weekly Office Hour: === What we discussed this week: - Discussion on priority BP and remaining reviews on those. - picked up 3 in-progress bug's patches and reviewed. Planned Features : == Below are the

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder][nova] Proper behavior for os-force_detach

2018-07-18 Thread Gorka Eguileor
On 17/07, Sean McGinnis wrote: > On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 04:06:29PM -0300, Erlon Cruz wrote: > > Hi Cinder and Nova folks, > > > > Working on some tests for our drivers, I stumbled upon this tempest test > > 'force_detach_volume' > > that is calling Cinder API passing a 'None' connector. At the

[openstack-dev] [edge][glance]: Image handling in edge environment

2018-07-18 Thread Csatari, Gergely (Nokia - HU/Budapest)
Hi, We had a great Forum session about image handling in edge environment in Vancouver [1]. As one outcome of the session I've created a wiki with the mentioned architecture options

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] New "validation" subcommand for "openstack undercloud"

2018-07-18 Thread Cédric Jeanneret
Dear Stackers, Seeing the answers on and off-list, we're moving forward! So, here are the first steps: A blueprint has been created: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/tripleo/+spec/validation-framework I've started a draft of the spec, based on the feedbacks and discussions I could have:

[openstack-dev] [watcher] weekly meeting

2018-07-18 Thread Чадин Александр Сергеевич
Watcher team, It’s just a reminder we will have meeting today at 08:00 UTC on #openstack-meeting-alt channel. Best Regards, Alex __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: