Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] prototype with standalone mode and remote edge compute nodes

2018-07-20 Thread Ben Nemec
On 07/20/2018 02:06 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote: On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 2:55 PM Ben Nemec > wrote: Okay, based on a private conversation this is coming off as way more troll-ish than I intended.  I don't understand where this work is going, but

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] prototype with standalone mode and remote edge compute nodes

2018-07-20 Thread Ben Nemec
On 07/20/2018 02:53 PM, James Slagle wrote: On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 7:13 PM, Ben Nemec wrote: On 07/19/2018 03:37 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote: Today I played a little bit with Standalone deployment [1] to deploy a single OpenStack cloud without the need of an undercloud and overcloud. The

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] prototype with standalone mode and remote edge compute nodes

2018-07-20 Thread James Slagle
On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 7:13 PM, Ben Nemec wrote: > > > On 07/19/2018 03:37 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote: >> >> Today I played a little bit with Standalone deployment [1] to deploy a >> single OpenStack cloud without the need of an undercloud and overcloud. >> The use-case I am testing is the

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] prototype with standalone mode and remote edge compute nodes

2018-07-20 Thread Harald Jensås
On Fri, 2018-07-20 at 15:06 -0400, Emilien Macchi wrote: > > > On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 2:55 PM Ben Nemec > wrote: > > Okay, based on a private conversation this is coming off as way > > more > > troll-ish than I intended. I don't understand where this work is > > going, > > but I don't

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] prototype with standalone mode and remote edge compute nodes

2018-07-20 Thread Emilien Macchi
On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 2:55 PM Ben Nemec wrote: > Okay, based on a private conversation this is coming off as way more > troll-ish than I intended. I don't understand where this work is going, > but I don't really need to so I'll step back from the discussion. > Apologies for any offense. >

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] prototype with standalone mode and remote edge compute nodes

2018-07-20 Thread Ben Nemec
Okay, based on a private conversation this is coming off as way more troll-ish than I intended. I don't understand where this work is going, but I don't really need to so I'll step back from the discussion. Apologies for any offense. -Ben On 07/20/2018 12:20 PM, Ben Nemec wrote: On

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] prototype with standalone mode and remote edge compute nodes

2018-07-20 Thread Ben Nemec
On 07/20/2018 01:18 AM, Bogdan Dobrelya wrote: On 7/20/18 2:13 AM, Ben Nemec wrote: On 07/19/2018 03:37 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote: Today I played a little bit with Standalone deployment [1] to deploy a single OpenStack cloud without the need of an undercloud and overcloud. The use-case I

Re: [openstack-dev] [self-healing] [ptg] PTG track schedule published

2018-07-20 Thread Thierry Carrez
Adam Spiers wrote: Apologies - I have had to change plans and leave on the Thursday evening (old friend is getting married on Saturday morning).  Is there any chance of swapping the self-healing slot with one of the others? It's tricky, as you asked to avoid conflicts with API SIG, Watcher,

Re: [openstack-dev] [self-healing] [ptg] PTG track schedule published

2018-07-20 Thread Adam Spiers
Thierry Carrez wrote: Thierry Carrez wrote: Hi everyone, Last month we published the tentative schedule layout for the 5 days of PTG. There was no major complaint, so that was confirmed as the PTG event schedule and published on the PTG website: https://www.openstack.org/ptg#tab_schedule

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [ptg] PTG track schedule published

2018-07-20 Thread Thierry Carrez
Thierry Carrez wrote: Hi everyone, Last month we published the tentative schedule layout for the 5 days of PTG. There was no major complaint, so that was confirmed as the PTG event schedule and published on the PTG website: https://www.openstack.org/ptg#tab_schedule The tab temporarily

[openstack-dev] [all] [ptg] PTG track schedule published

2018-07-20 Thread Thierry Carrez
Hi everyone, Last month we published the tentative schedule layout for the 5 days of PTG. There was no major complaint, so that was confirmed as the PTG event schedule and published on the PTG website: https://www.openstack.org/ptg#tab_schedule You'll notice that: - The Ops meetup days

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] New "validation" subcommand for "openstack undercloud"

2018-07-20 Thread Bogdan Dobrelya
On 7/16/18 6:32 PM, Dan Prince wrote: On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 11:27 AM Cédric Jeanneret wrote: Dear Stackers, In order to let operators properly validate their undercloud node, I propose to create a new subcommand in the "openstack undercloud" "tree": `openstack undercloud validate' This

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Proposing Jose Luis Franco for TripleO core reviewer on Upgrade bits

2018-07-20 Thread Jose Luis Franco Arza
Thank you very much to all for the recognition. I will use this power with responsibility, as Uncle Ben once said: https://giphy.com/gifs/MCZ39lz83o5lC/fullscreen Regards, Jose Luis On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 1:00 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote: > > > On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 4:09 AM Carlos Camacho

[openstack-dev] [nova] [placement] placement update 18-29

2018-07-20 Thread Chris Dent
HTML: https://anticdent.org/placement-update-18-29.html This is placement update 18-28, a weekly update of ongoing development related to the [OpenStack](https://www.openstack.org/) [placement service](https://developer.openstack.org/api-ref/placement/). Thanks to Jay for providing one of

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] prototype with standalone mode and remote edge compute nodes

2018-07-20 Thread Emilien Macchi
On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 7:43 AM Emilien Macchi wrote: > On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 7:09 AM Emilien Macchi wrote: > >> Yeah I thought about this one too but I didn't have this challenge since >> I just wanted nova-compute & neutron-ovs-agent running on the edge. >> > > Actually I just faced it: >

Re: [openstack-dev] Disk space requirement - any way to lower it a little?

2018-07-20 Thread Cédric Jeanneret
On 07/20/2018 09:49 AM, Cédric Jeanneret wrote: > > > On 07/19/2018 06:55 PM, Paul Belanger wrote: >> On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 05:30:27PM +0200, Cédric Jeanneret wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> While trying to get a new validation¹ in the undercloud preflight >>> checks, I hit an (not so) unexpected

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] prototype with standalone mode and remote edge compute nodes

2018-07-20 Thread James Slagle
On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 7:09 AM, Emilien Macchi wrote: > > > On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 4:20 AM Giulio Fidente wrote: > [...] >> >> I have started experimenting with edge deployments to help out on the >> split-controplane spec [1], which Steven started addressing >> >> I was able to deploy

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] prototype with standalone mode and remote edge compute nodes

2018-07-20 Thread Emilien Macchi
On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 7:09 AM Emilien Macchi wrote: > Yeah I thought about this one too but I didn't have this challenge since I > just wanted nova-compute & neutron-ovs-agent running on the edge. > Actually I just faced it: Error: Failed to perform requested operation on instance "my-vm",

Re: [openstack-dev] [edge][glance]: Image handling in edge environment

2018-07-20 Thread Csatari, Gergely (Nokia - HU/Budapest)
Hi, We figured out with Jokke two timeslots what would be okay for both of us for this common meeting. Please, other interested parties give your votes to here: https://doodle.com/poll/9rfcb8aavsmybzfu I will evaluate the results and fix the time on 25.07.2018 12h CET. Br, Gerg0 From:

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder][nova] Proper behavior for os-force_detach

2018-07-20 Thread Erlon Cruz
Nice, good to know. Thanks all for the feedback. We will fix that in our drivers. @Walter, so, in this case, if Cinder has the connector, it should not need to call the driver passing a None object right? Erlon Em qua, 18 de jul de 2018 às 12:56, Walter Boring escreveu: > The whole purpose of

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] prototype with standalone mode and remote edge compute nodes

2018-07-20 Thread Emilien Macchi
On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 4:20 AM Giulio Fidente wrote: [...] > I have started experimenting with edge deployments to help out on the > split-controplane spec [1], which Steven started addressing > > I was able to deploy multiple stacks and isolated Ceph clusters, there > are some bits missing to

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Proposing Jose Luis Franco for TripleO core reviewer on Upgrade bits

2018-07-20 Thread Emilien Macchi
On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 4:09 AM Carlos Camacho Gonzalez wrote: > Hi!!! > > I'll like to propose Jose Luis Franco [1][2] for core reviewer in all the > TripleO upgrades bits. He shows a constant and active involvement in > improving and fixing our updates/upgrades workflows, he helps also trying

Re: [openstack-dev] [stable][meta] Proposing Retiring the Stable Branch project

2018-07-20 Thread Thierry Carrez
Tony Breeds wrote: On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 01:05:26PM +1000, Tony Breeds wrote: Hello folks, So really the subject says it all. I fell like at the time we created the Stable branch project team that was the only option. Since then we have crated the SIG structure and in my opinion

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Proposing Jose Luis Franco for TripleO core reviewer on Upgrade bits

2018-07-20 Thread Yurii Prokulevych
On Fri, 2018-07-20 at 10:07 +0200, Carlos Camacho Gonzalez wrote: > Hi!!! > > I'll like to propose Jose Luis Franco [1][2] for core reviewer in all > the TripleO upgrades bits. He shows a constant and active involvement > in improving and fixing our updates/upgrades workflows, he helps also >

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] prototype with standalone mode and remote edge compute nodes

2018-07-20 Thread Giulio Fidente
On 07/19/2018 10:37 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote: > Today I played a little bit with Standalone deployment [1] to deploy a > single OpenStack cloud without the need of an undercloud and overcloud. > The use-case I am testing is the following: > "As an operator, I want to deploy a single node

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Proposing Jose Luis Franco for TripleO core reviewer on Upgrade bits

2018-07-20 Thread Marios Andreou
On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 11:07 AM, Carlos Camacho Gonzalez < ccama...@redhat.com> wrote: > Hi!!! > > I'll like to propose Jose Luis Franco [1][2] for core reviewer in all the > TripleO upgrades bits. He shows a constant and active involvement in > improving and fixing our updates/upgrades

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Proposing Jose Luis Franco for TripleO core reviewer on Upgrade bits

2018-07-20 Thread Bogdan Dobrelya
On 7/20/18 11:07 AM, Carlos Camacho Gonzalez wrote: Hi!!! I'll like to propose Jose Luis Franco [1][2] for core reviewer in all the TripleO upgrades bits. He shows a constant and active involvement in improving and fixing our updates/upgrades workflows, he helps also trying to

[openstack-dev] [tripleo] Proposing Jose Luis Franco for TripleO core reviewer on Upgrade bits

2018-07-20 Thread Carlos Camacho Gonzalez
Hi!!! I'll like to propose Jose Luis Franco [1][2] for core reviewer in all the TripleO upgrades bits. He shows a constant and active involvement in improving and fixing our updates/upgrades workflows, he helps also trying to develop/improve/fix our upstream support for testing the

Re: [openstack-dev] Disk space requirement - any way to lower it a little?

2018-07-20 Thread Cédric Jeanneret
On 07/19/2018 06:55 PM, Paul Belanger wrote: > On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 05:30:27PM +0200, Cédric Jeanneret wrote: >> Hello, >> >> While trying to get a new validation¹ in the undercloud preflight >> checks, I hit an (not so) unexpected issue with the CI: >> it doesn't provide flavors with the

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] prototype with standalone mode and remote edge compute nodes

2018-07-20 Thread Bogdan Dobrelya
On 7/20/18 2:13 AM, Ben Nemec wrote: On 07/19/2018 03:37 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote: Today I played a little bit with Standalone deployment [1] to deploy a single OpenStack cloud without the need of an undercloud and overcloud. The use-case I am testing is the following: "As an operator, I