HI Sean,
I think that we(Lance and I) from Huawei are willing to take over and
continue this feature. I hope that we can get some information and
suggestion from you. Such as: what’s the progress now? What should I do
now? IMHO, the main work now is to update and polish these two specs[1],
right?
+1.
2017-10-12 8:53 GMT+08:00 hao wang :
> +1
> I'm very exciting to hear this. gecong is an great contributor in
> Zaqar project, hope we can work together to make more awesome
> features done in Zaqar.
>
> 2017-10-11 15:41 GMT+08:00 Thomas Herve :
> > On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 11:15 PM, feilong
mas wrote:
>
>> On 27 March 2017 at 14:20, 王玺源 > <mailto:wangxiyuan1...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>> I think the reason is quite simple:
>> 1. Some users don't want to use key/value pairs to tag volums. They
>> just need some simple strings.
&g
;t need to know what' the
key related to the value.
4. For Web App, it should be a basic function[1]
[1]https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tag_(metadata)
2017-03-27 19:49 GMT+08:00 Sean McGinnis >:
> On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 03:13:59PM +0800, 王玺源 wrote:
> > Hi cinder team:
> &
Hi cinder team:
I want to know what's your thought about adding tags for volumes.
Now Many resources, like Nova instances, Glance images, Neutron
networks and so on, all support tagging. And some of our cloud customers
want this feature in Cinder as well. It's useful for auditing, billing
.py (to change the status back).
>
> Do you want to submit a bug fix for this change?
>
> Thanks,
> Xing
>
>
>
> From: 王玺源 [wangxiyuan1...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Sunday, March 5, 2017 9:51 PM
> To: OpenStack Development Maili
the same API. So I think volume status should be changed to “backing-up”
> to be consistent. Now I’m thinking the status of the snapshot should be
> changed to “backing-up” too if snapshot_id is provided.
>
> Thanks,
> Xing
>
>
> ___
Hi cinder team:
We met a problem about backup create recently.
The backup can be created from volumes or snapshots. In the both cases, the
volume' s status is set to 'backing-up'.
But as I know, when users create backup with snapshots, the volume is not
used(Correct me if I'm wrong). So why the v
terrible, which would
> explain your benchmark results. If you run a similar benchmark with
> caching, I'd be eager to see the new configuration and benchmark results.
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 8:16 AM 王玺源 wrote:
>
>> Hi Dolph:
>>
>> We made the keystone.con
.
Lance Bragstad 于2017年2月17日 周五下午1:10写道：
> On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 11:22 AM, Clint Byrum wrote:
>
> Excerpts from 王玺源's message of 2017-02-17 14:08:30 +:
> > Hi David:
> >
> > We have not find the perfect solution to solve the fernet performance
> >
://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:merged+project:openstack/keystone+branch:master+topic:make-fernet-default
> [4]
> https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:merged+project:openstack/keystone+branch:master+topic:cleanup-token-provider
> [5]
> http://specs.openstack.org/openstack/keystone-sp
-default
> [4]
> https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:merged+project:openstack/keystone+branch:master+topic:cleanup-token-provider
> [5]
> http://specs.openstack.org/openstack/keystone-specs/specs/keystone/ocata/token-provider-cleanup.html
>
> On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 8:44 AM, David
large size, but the size also make it difficult
for guessing or steal.
David Stanek 于2017年2月15日 周三下午10:45写道：
> On 15-Feb 18:16, 王玺源 wrote:
> > Hello everyone,
> > PKI/PKIZ token has been removed from keystone in Ocata. But recently
> our
> > production team did some test ab
Hello everyone,
PKI/PKIZ token has been removed from keystone in Ocata. But recently our
production team did some test about PKI and Fernet token (With Keystone
Mitaka). They found that in large-scale production environment, Fernet
token's performance is not as good as PKI. Here is the test data:
Hi Nikhil,
You are the first PTL I knew when I started to work with OpenStack
community, we can see your hard work for Glance during these cycles. I have
learned a lot from your review suggestion. Thanks very much!!! And
it's great to know that you still work on Glance. Best wishes.
2016-09-13
+1, Thomas did a great job on Zaqar. As we can see, many important feature
are done by him.
Welcome, thomas.
2016-07-01 6:33 GMT+08:00 Emilien Macchi :
> I'm not core but Thomas helped Puppet OpenStack group many times to
> get Zaqar working in gate and we highly appreciate his help.
> Way to go
16 matches
Mail list logo
