On Dec 10, 2013, at 3:12 PM, Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com
wrote:
On 12/10/2013 04:10 PM, Georgy Okrokvertskhov wrote:
Hi,
In Solum project we are currently creating tests environments for future
test. We split unit tests and functional tests in order to use tempest
framework from the
Devdatta,
On Dec 10, 2013, at 12:37 PM, devdatta kulkarni
devdatta.kulka...@rackspace.com wrote:
Hi Adrian,
Thanks for creating https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/solum-demystified
I am really excited to see the examples. Especially cool is how
examples 2 and 3 demonstrate using a
Dolph,
Is anyone already focusing on py33 compatibility for python-keystoneclient? Has
that effort been scoped? I'd like to judge whether it's reasonable to expect us
to patch it up to be compatible in the near term, or relax our expectations.
For Solum, we are trying to make all our code py33
On Dec 4, 2013, at 12:32 PM, Monty Taylor mord...@inaugust.com wrote:
On 12/04/2013 03:25 PM, Clint Byrum wrote:
Excerpts from Paul Montgomery's message of 2013-12-04 12:04:06 -0800:
TLDR: Should Solum log a warning if operators do not use the InnoDB
storage engine with MySQL in Solum's
Am I interpreting this to mean that WSME is calling unicode()?
On Dec 4, 2013, at 1:32 PM, Georgy Okrokvertskhov
gokrokvertsk...@mirantis.commailto:gokrokvertsk...@mirantis.com
wrote:
Hi,
I am working on unit tests for Solum as a side effect of new unit tests I found
that we use unicode
Boris,
Thanks for expressing your concern about this. For those reading the Solum
topic on this list, we really want this to be a community building resource
were we are free to discuss ideas and as a primary mechanism for gauging
consensus. Applying restrictions to how the list is used by
Boris,
On Dec 4, 2013, at 2:53 PM, Boris Pavlovic
bpavlo...@mirantis.commailto:bpavlo...@mirantis.com
wrote:
All,
Thank you guys for your opinion.
As a conclusion of this thread, I think that I shouldn't hesitate to raise all
discussion about Rally in mailing list also.. Right?
Yes, if
, Adrian Otto wrote:
Am I interpreting this to mean that WSME is calling unicode()?
On Dec 4, 2013, at 1:32 PM, Georgy Okrokvertskhov
gokrokvertsk...@mirantis.commailto:gokrokvertsk...@mirantis.com
wrote:
Hi,
I am working on unit tests for Solum as a side effect of new unit tests I found
Clint,
On Dec 4, 2013, at 4:06 PM, Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com
wrote:
Excerpts from Adrian Otto's message of 2013-12-04 15:44:45 -0800:
Jamie,
Thanks for the guidance here. I am checking to see if any of our developers
might take an interest in helping with the upstream work. At the
On Dec 4, 2013, at 4:06 PM, Fox, Kevin M kevin@pnnl.gov
wrote:
What is the difference between Heater, Cloudify
(http://appcatalog.cloudifysource.org/#/?tumblr)
Cloudify is a Java based open source cloud management tool from Gigaspaces.
Cloudify developers are part of the Solum project
:05:07, Jamie Lennox
(jamielen...@redhat.commailto://jamielen...@redhat.com) wrote:
On Wed, 2013-12-04 at 20:48 -0500, David Stanek wrote:
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 6:44 PM, Adrian Otto
adrian.o...@rackspace.com wrote:
Jamie,
Thanks for the guidance here. I am checking to see if any of
our
I did some streamlining of the etherpad on this:
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/MinimalCLI
I agree that required arguments should be positional. The only one that is
confusing is the --repo argument to the app create command, which will end up
being optional in a subsequent release, so I
Jay is right. What we have is probably close enough to what's in Nova to
qualify for oslo-incubator. The simplifications seem to me to have general
appeal so this code would be more attractive to other projects. One worry I
have is that there is still a good deal of magic behavior in this code,
Sorry, I changed the link. We originally started with hyphenated noun-verbs but
switched to the current proposal upon receipt of advice that it would be more
compatible with the next version of the cliff based CLI for OpenStack. If I
remember correctly this advice came from Doug Hellman.
--
On Nov 27, 2013, at 3:23 AM, Tom Deckers (tdeckers) tdeck...@cisco.com
wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Adrian Otto [mailto:adrian.o...@rackspace.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2013 0:28
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev
Jay,
On Nov 27, 2013, at 10:36 AM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 11/27/2013 06:23 AM, Tom Deckers (tdeckers) wrote:
I understand the an Assembly can be a larger group of components.
However, those together exist to provide a capability which we want
to capture in some catalog so
On Nov 27, 2013, at 2:25 PM, Georgy Okrokvertskhov
gokrokvertsk...@mirantis.com wrote:
Hi,
I am working on the user-authentication BP implementation. I need to
introduce a new configuration option for enable or disable keystone
authentication for incoming request. I am looking for a
On Nov 27, 2013, at 11:46 AM, Murali Allada
murali.all...@rackspace.commailto:murali.all...@rackspace.com wrote:
No, I was Infact thinking about making all responses synchronous to keep things
simple in the beginning. Mostly because I can't think of any use case that
requires asynchronous
On Nov 27, 2013, at 11:39 AM, Nathan Kinder nkin...@redhat.com
wrote:
On 11/27/2013 08:58 AM, Paul Montgomery wrote:
I created some relatively high level security best practices that I
thought would apply to Solum. I don't think it is ever too early to get
mindshare around security so that
On Nov 27, 2013, at 11:27 AM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote:
On 11/27/2013 02:03 PM, Adrian Otto wrote:
Jay,
On Nov 27, 2013, at 10:36 AM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote:
On 11/27/2013 06:23 AM, Tom Deckers (tdeckers) wrote:
I understand the an Assembly can be a larger group
Tom,
On Nov 26, 2013, at 12:09 PM, Tom Deckers (tdeckers) tdeck...@cisco.com
wrote:
Hi All,
Few comments on the Definitions blueprint [1]:
1. I'd propose to alter the term 'Application' to either 'Application
Package' or 'Package'. Application isn't very descriptive and can be
On Nov 26, 2013, at 4:20 PM, Clayton Coleman ccole...@redhat.com wrote:
On Nov 26, 2013, at 6:30 PM, Adrian Otto adrian.o...@rackspace.com wrote:
Tom,
On Nov 26, 2013, at 12:09 PM, Tom Deckers (tdeckers) tdeck...@cisco.com
wrote:
Hi All,
Few comments on the Definitions
I think I mentioned this before, but the working group has not made any binding
decisions. We already identified Zuul and Nodepool as tools to learn more
about. It's not clear to us yet if it makes sense for the simple use case. That
will be one of the things we discuss.
We do know that Solum
On Nov 23, 2013, at 2:39 PM, Robert Collins robe...@robertcollins.net
wrote:
On 24 November 2013 05:42, Clayton Coleman ccole...@redhat.com wrote:
Containers will work fine in diskimage-builder. One only needs to hack
in the ability to save in the container image format rather than qcow2.
. Additional commands can be
added as we add support for additional features in subsequent releases.
Adrian
On Nov 15, 2013, at 12:00 PM, Doug Hellmann
doug.hellm...@dreamhost.commailto:doug.hellm...@dreamhost.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 2:28 AM, Adrian Otto
adrian.o
The breakout meeting schedule poll is published here (dates will be published
here once they are selected):
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Solum/BreakoutMeetings#Language_Pack_Working_Group_Series
If you would like to join the working group, please:
1) Subscribe to the lang-pack blueprint:
Monty,
On Nov 22, 2013, at 6:24 PM, Monty Taylor mord...@inaugust.com
wrote:
On 11/22/2013 05:37 PM, Krishna Raman wrote:
Hello all,
I would like to kickoff the Git integration discussion. Goal of this
subgroup is to go through the git-integration blueprint [1] and break it
up into
+2
Yes, thanks for raising that concern. I did approve a few patches before we had
other core reviewers configured, and I think I also may have also approved a
.gitignore patch after. I will strictly conform to our two +2 workflow going
forward, as I agree that merge policy is a good one.
--
No. Registration is for in person attendance only.
--
Adrian
Original message
From: Rajdeep Dua
Date:11/18/2013 5:39 AM (GMT-08:00)
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Solum] SFO Design Workshop
Do we need to
Is there easy parking at the rackspace office?
On Nov 18, 2013, at 7:33 AM, Adrian Otto
adrian.o...@rackspace.commailto:adrian.o...@rackspace.com wrote:
No. Registration is for in person attendance only.
--
Adrian
Original message
From: Rajdeep Dua
Date:11/18/2013 5:39 AM
On Nov 15, 2013, at 2:06 AM, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.org wrote:
Wow, lots of different opinions! let's try to summarize:
Arguments in favor of splitting openstack-dev / stackforge-dev
* People can easily filter out all non-openstack discussions
* Traffic would drop by about 25%
*
Jay,
Thanks for the great question. They really are different.
Heat's mission (correct me if there is a more recent one) is:
To explicitly model the relationships between OpenStack resources of all
kinds; and to harness those models, expressed in forms accessible to both
humans and machines,
established and reviews flowing smoothly over the next few
months.
Adrian Otto (adrian_otto) - Solum PTL (Principal Architect, Rackspace)
Monty Taylor (mordred) - OpenStack Technical Committee, OpenStack Board of
Directors (Distinguished Technologist, HP)
Robert Collins (lifeless) - TripleO PTL
Rob,
Yes you both certainly are! Sorry for the omission!
Cheers,
Adrian
On Nov 14, 2013, at 8:04 PM, Robert Collins robe...@robertcollins.net
wrote:
On 15 November 2013 10:53, Adrian Otto adrian.o...@rackspace.com wrote:
Adrian Otto (adrian_otto) - Solum PTL (Principal Architect
Team,
This is a reminder that we will conduct our API deep dive discussion on IRC in
#solum at 2100 UTC today (1:00 PM US/Pacific).
Details: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Solum/BreakoutMeetings
Thanks,
Adrian
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
Clayton,
On Nov 13, 2013, at 11:41 AM, Clayton Coleman ccole...@redhat.com
wrote:
- Original Message -
Hello,
Solum meets Tuesdays at 1600 UTC in #openstack-meeting-alt (formerly in
#solum)
Note: Due to the Nov 3rd change in Daylight Savings Time, this now happens at
08:00
Doug,
On Nov 13, 2013, at 9:28 AM, Doug Hellmann
doug.hellm...@dreamhost.commailto:doug.hellm...@dreamhost.com wrote:
On Sun, Nov 10, 2013 at 10:15 AM, Noorul Islam K M
noo...@noorul.commailto:noo...@noorul.com wrote:
Hello all,
I registered a new blueprint [1] for command line client
Hello,
Solum meets Tuesdays at 1600 UTC in #openstack-meeting-alt (formerly in #solum)
Note: Due to the Nov 3rd change in Daylight Savings Time, this now happens at
08:00 US/Pacific (starts in about 50 minutes from now)
Agenda: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Solum
Regards,
Adrian
Hello,
Solum meets Tuesdays at 1600 UTC in #openstack-meeting-alt (formerly in #solum)
Note: Due to the Nov 3rd change in Daylight Savings Time, this now happens at
08:00 US/Pacific (starts in about 45 minutes from now)
Agenda: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Solum
Regards,
Adrian
Solum Team,
First of all I wanted to say that I have been thinking a lot about this thread,
and have been seeking input from a number of you who attended the Summit this
week. I do *not* see this decision as a critical one, because if something
really mattered a ton we could rip our one
Brent,
Thank you for putting together such a clear and thoughtful post. Your article
was quoted and included on the Solum.io community site, and has inspired other
new contributors as well. Viewpoints like yours help illustrate that this
effort is really about working together to address
Clint,
The rules about use of the OpenStack brand are clear, and Solum is not allowed
to use it. We are a part of the OpenStack ecosystem, but the OpenStack brand
(trademark/logo) is reserved for those projects that are Integrated or Core. At
this point what we need is a good collaboration
Russell,
On Nov 2, 2013, at 9:18 PM, Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com
wrote:
On 11/02/2013 01:42 AM, Adrian Otto wrote:
Team,
We have a blueprint for logging architecture within Solum, which is an
important feature to aid in debugging at runtime:
https://blueprints.launchpad.net
On Nov 3, 2013, at 6:54 AM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote:
On 11/02/2013 11:26 PM, Russell Bryant wrote:
On 11/02/2013 11:54 AM, Adrian Otto wrote:
Noorul,
I agree that key decisions should be tracked in blueprints. This is the
one for this decision which was made in our 2013-10-18
Jay,
On Nov 2, 2013, at 2:39 PM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
One of the most important aspects in the early stages of Solum development
will be the consensus building and stabilization of the Solum API
specification. A solid API spec aid in the speeding up the pace of
Team,
The dates have been chosen based on your feedback:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Solum/BreakoutMeetings#Solum_API_Deep_Dive
Please mark your calendars for 2100 UTC on 2013-11-13 and 2013-11-15. We will
meet in #solum.
Thanks,
Adrian
On Oct 31, 2013, at 11:35 AM, Adrian Otto adrian.o
Team,
We have a blueprint for logging architecture within Solum, which is an
important feature to aid in debugging at runtime:
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/solum/+spec/logging
The team voted for a lightweight governance style, and because we are planning
to skip our upcoming meeting doe
Noorul,
I agree that key decisions should be tracked in blueprints. This is the one for
this decision which was made in our 2013-10-18 public meeting. Jay's submission
is consistent with the direction indicated by the team.
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/solum/+spec/rest-api-base
Transcript
On Nov 1, 2013, at 7:03 PM, Noorul Islam K M
noo...@noorul.commailto:noo...@noorul.com
wrote:
Clark Boylan clark.boy...@gmail.commailto:clark.boy...@gmail.com writes:
On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 6:29 PM, Noorul Islam K M
noo...@noorul.commailto:noo...@noorul.com wrote:
Now we have the first
be a special
snowflake here.
Sent from my really tiny device...
On Oct 30, 2013, at 9:55 PM, Adrian Otto adrian.o...@rackspace.com wrote:
Noorul,
Yes, it uses WordPress. The community website will be used primarily as a
rally point for attracting new contributors. It will have
On Oct 31, 2013, at 6:42 AM, Adrian Otto adrian.o...@rackspace.com wrote:
Robert,
We would be interested in exploring your use case for CD, and help you judge
what would be the best fit. I know that Monty Taylor has identified some
parts of openstack-infra that we could potentially
.
Thanks,
Adrian
On Oct 30, 2013, at 6:03 PM, Adrian Otto adrian.o...@rackspace.com wrote:
Team,
Those of us interested in participating in a series of API deep-dive design
discussions, are encouraged to provide date/time scheduling feedback at the
link shown on our Breakout Meetings wiki
Jay,
It is November 19 and 20. Looks like because it was sent as a calendar invite
that the notes were scrubbed. Here is the text:
Workshop sessions
Nov 19 Tuesday 9:30 am - 5 pm
Nov 20 Wednesday 9:30 am - 3:00 pm (we break early on Wednesday if some of us
want to catch an evening return
Team,
Our StackForge code repo is open, so you may begin submitting code for review.
For those new to the process, I made a will page with links to the repo and
information about how to contribute:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Solum/Contributing
Regards,
Adrian
Hi,
The Solum team has agreed[1] to use openstack-dev, and has closed its
project-specific mailing list. We look forward to discussing ongoing design and
development efforts here. We are also transitioning to an openstack meeting
channel for subsequent public meetings.
Regards,
Adrian Otto
the OpenStack brand. Can you help adjust this for us?
Thanks,
Adrian
On Oct 30, 2013, at 3:32 PM, Stefano Maffulli stef...@openstack.org
wrote:
On 10/30/2013 12:08 PM, Adrian Otto wrote:
The Solum team has agreed[1] to use openstack-dev, and has closed its
project-specific mailing list
Clayton,
Thanks for adding the diagram illustrating the flow. I expect that respond to
client may not be a synchronous flow, rather that if creation of a repo takes
a while that the API may return a 202 Accepted, and the client can poll a
status attribute to determine completion and learn the
Team,
Those of us interested in participating in a series of API deep-dive design
discussions, are encouraged to provide date/time scheduling feedback at the
link shown on our Breakout Meetings wiki page:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Solum/BreakoutMeetings
We look forward to your input to
at
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Solum/FeatureBlueprints/GitIntegration#Flow_Boundaries
I'm having a little trouble mapping that into your design.
I'm wondering if you can expand on how that hangs together?
Thanks!
Rob
On 31 October 2013 14:01, Adrian Otto adrian.o...@rackspace.com wrote
Noorul,
Yes, it uses WordPress. The community website will be used primarily as a rally
point for attracting new contributors. It will have a blog feature which is
currently being configured so the project contributors can publish related
content there. We expect to use this site to attract
Thomas and Russell,
On Oct 24, 2013, at 8:03 AM, Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com wrote:
On 10/24/2013 08:51 AM, Thomas Spatzier wrote:
Hi Adrian,
really intersting! I wonder what the relation to all the software
orchestration in Heat discussions is that have been going on for a while
this exciting new addition to the OpenStack
ecosystem.
Project Wiki
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Solum
Lauchpad Project
https://launchpad.net/solum
IRC
Public IRC meetings are held on Tuesdays 1600 UTC
irc://irc.freenode.net:6667/solum
Thanks,
Adrian Otto
I have a different point of view. First I will offer some assertions:
A-1) We need to keep it simple.
A-1.1) Systems that are hard to comprehend are hard to debug, and
that's bad.
A-1.2) Complex systems tend to be much more brittle than simple ones.
A-2) Scale-up operations need
Clint,
On Jul 23, 2013, at 10:03 AM, Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com
wrote:
Excerpts from Steve Baker's message of 2013-07-22 21:43:05 -0700:
On 07/23/2013 10:46 AM, Angus Salkeld wrote:
On 22/07/13 16:52 +0200, Bartosz Górski wrote:
Hi folks,
I would like to start a discussion about the
- perhaps volumes and other things
Mappings is one of the high level concepts in CFN that I think can be
completely eliminated with auto-discovery.
Respectfully,
Adrian Otto
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http
Angus,
I'm glad you are asking good questions. I have additional input for you to
consider below.
On Jun 18, 2013, at 6:09 PM, Angus Salkeld asalk...@redhat.com wrote:
On 18/06/13 23:32 +, Adrian Otto wrote:
Yes. I think having a POST method in the API makes perfect sense. Assuming
we
301 - 366 of 366 matches
Mail list logo
