[openstack-dev] [nova] Nova API sub-team meeting

Hi, We have weekly Nova API meeting today. The meeting is being held Wednesday UTC1300 and irc channel is #openstack-meeting-4. The proposed agenda and meeting details are here: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/NovaAPI Please feel free to add items to the agenda. Thanks

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] os-capabilities library created

2016-08-16 7:31 GMT+08:00 Jay Pipes <jaypi...@gmail.com>: > On 08/15/2016 03:57 AM, Alex Xu wrote: > >> 2016-08-15 12:56 GMT+08:00 Yingxin Cheng <yingxinch...@gmail.com >> <mailto:yingxinch...@gmail.com>>: >> >> >> Hi, >> >>

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] os-capabilities library created

2016-08-15 12:56 GMT+08:00 Yingxin Cheng : > Hi, > > I'm concerned with the dependencies between "os-capabilities" library and > all the other OpenStack services such as Nova, Placement, Ironic, etc. > > Rather than embedding the universal "os-capabilities" in Nova,

[openstack-dev] [nova] The deprecation of proxy API related CLI

Hi, guys, We have agreement on how to deprecate the CLI for the proxy APIs which were deprecated in 2.36 when mid-cycle. But I still feels that we have something isn't very clear. So I just want to summary the situation at here, and to be clear the final goal. Here are the patches

[openstack-dev] [nova] Nova API sub-team meeting

Hi, We have weekly Nova API meeting today. The meeting is being held Wednesday UTC1300 and irc channel is #openstack-meeting-4. The proposed agenda and meeting details are here: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/NovaAPI Please feel free to add items to the agenda. Thanks

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] [scheduler] Use ResourceProviderTags instead of ResourceClass?

ink the way is "Use ResourceProviderTags instead of ResourceClass", not "Use ResourceClass instead of ResourceClass" 2016-08-05 21:16 GMT+08:00 Chris Dent <cdent...@anticdent.org>: > On Tue, 2 Aug 2016, Alex Xu wrote: > > Chris have a thought about

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Some thoughts on API microversions

2016-08-05 0:43 GMT+08:00 Andrew Laski : > > > On Thu, Aug 4, 2016, at 11:40 AM, John Garbutt wrote: > > On 4 August 2016 at 16:28, Edward Leafe wrote: > > > On Aug 4, 2016, at 8:18 AM, Andrew Laski wrote: > > > > > >> This gets to the point

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Some thoughts on API microversions

Agree with Andrew about Microversions may overused. I thought similar thing before. The Microversions should be the version control of API 'core' protocol. So I can say the protocol of send an action to server is: 'POST /servers/{uuid}/action'. We won't bump microversion for any new action or

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Does this api modification need Microversion?

2016-08-03 22:03 GMT+08:00 Matt Riedemann : > On 8/2/2016 1:11 AM, han.ro...@zte.com.cn wrote: > >> patchset url: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/334747/ >> >> >> >> Allow "revert_resize" to recover error instance after resize/migrate. >> >> When resize/migrate

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] [scheduler] Use ResourceProviderTags instead of ResourceClass?

2016-08-03 2:12 GMT+08:00 Jay Pipes <jaypi...@gmail.com>: > On 08/02/2016 08:19 AM, Alex Xu wrote: > >> Chris have a thought about using ResourceClass to describe Capabilities >> with an infinite inventory. In the beginning we brain storming the idea >> of Tags, Tan

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] os-virtual-interfaces isn't deprecated in 2.36

2016-08-03 14:40 GMT+08:00 Alex Xu <sou...@gmail.com>: > > > 2016-08-02 22:09 GMT+08:00 Matt Riedemann <mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>: > >> On 8/2/2016 2:41 AM, Alex Xu wrote: >> >>> A little strange we have two API endpoints, one is >>> '/serve

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] os-virtual-interfaces isn't deprecated in 2.36

2016-08-02 22:09 GMT+08:00 Matt Riedemann <mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>: > On 8/2/2016 2:41 AM, Alex Xu wrote: > >> A little strange we have two API endpoints, one is >> '/servers/{uuid}/os-interfaces', another one is >> '/servers/{uuid}/os-virtual-interfaces'. &g

[openstack-dev] [nova] Nova API sub-team meeting

Hi, We have weekly Nova API meeting tomorrow. The meeting is being held Wednesday UTC1300 and irc channel is #openstack-meeting-4. The proposed agenda and meeting details are here: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/NovaAPI Please feel free to add items to the agenda. Thanks

[openstack-dev] [nova] [scheduler] Use ResourceProviderTags instead of ResourceClass?

Chris have a thought about using ResourceClass to describe Capabilities with an infinite inventory. In the beginning we brain storming the idea of Tags, Tan Lin have same thought, but we say no very quickly, due to the ResourceClass is really about Quantitative stuff. But Chris give very good

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] os-virtual-interfaces isn't deprecated in 2.36

2016-08-02 4:13 GMT+08:00 Matt Riedemann : > On 8/1/2016 1:39 PM, Ken'ichi Ohmichi wrote: > >> 2016-07-29 10:32 GMT-07:00 Sean Dague : >> >>> On 07/28/2016 05:38 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: >>> On 7/28/2016 3:55 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: >

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] [RFC] ResourceProviderTags - Manage Capabilities with ResourceProvider

Nova-spec is submitted: https://review.openstack.org/345138, welcome review and comments! 2016-07-11 19:08 GMT+08:00 Alex Xu <sou...@gmail.com>: > This propose is about using ResourceProviderTags as a solution to manage > Capabilities (Qualitative) in ResourceProvider. > The Resou

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] [RFC] ResourceProviderTags - Manage Capabilities with ResourceProvider

2016-07-28 22:31 GMT+08:00 Jay Pipes <jaypi...@gmail.com>: > On 07/20/2016 11:25 PM, Alex Xu wrote: > >> One more for end users: Capabilities Discovery API, it should be 'GET >> /resource_providers/tags'. Or a proxy API from nova to the placement >> API? >>

[openstack-dev] [nova] Nova API sub-team meeting

Hi, We have weekly Nova API meeting today. The meeting is being held Wednesday UTC1300 and irc channel is #openstack-meeting-4. The proposed agenda and meeting details are here: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/NovaAPI Please feel free to add items to the agenda. Thanks

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] [RFC] ResourceProviderTags - Manage Capabilities with ResourceProvider

; Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] [RFC] ResourceProviderTags - Manage > > Capabilities with ResourceProvider > > > > On 07/13/2016 01:37 PM, Ed Leafe wrote: > > > On Jul 11, 2016, at 6:08 AM, Alex Xu <sou...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > &g

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] [RFC] ResourceProviderTags - Manage Capabilities with ResourceProvider

2016-07-20 11:08 GMT-07:00 Jay Pipes <jaypi...@gmail.com>: > On 07/18/2016 01:45 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: > >> On 7/15/2016 8:06 PM, Alex Xu wrote: >> >>> >>> Actually I still think aggregates isn't good for Manage Caps, just as I >>> sai

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] [RFC] ResourceProviderTags - Manage Capabilities with ResourceProvider

2016-07-18 13:45 GMT-07:00 Matt Riedemann <mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>: > On 7/15/2016 8:06 PM, Alex Xu wrote: > >> >> Actually I still think aggregates isn't good for Manage Caps, just as I >> said in previous reply about Aggregates. One of reason is just same w

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] [RFC] ResourceProviderTags - Manage Capabilities with ResourceProvider

2016-07-14 10:38 GMT+08:00 Cheng, Yingxin : > > On 7/14/16, 05:42, "Ed Leafe" wrote: > On Jul 12, 2016, at 2:43 AM, Cheng, Yingxin > wrote: > > 4. Capabilities are managed/grouped/abstracted by namespaces, and > scheduler

[openstack-dev] [nova] Nova API sub-team meeting

Hi, We have weekly Nova API meeting today. The meeting is being held Wednesday UTC1300 and irc channel is #openstack-meeting-4. The proposed agenda and meeting details are here: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/NovaAPI Please feel free to add items to the agenda. Thanks

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] [RFC] ResourceProviderTags - Manage Capabilities with ResourceProvider

to write script to manage the Capabilities. Thinking the aggregate, the script will be very hard due to manage the mapping between aggregates and hosts. The script will be very easy with tags, due to tags just a set of string. 2016-07-11 19:08 GMT+08:00 Alex Xu <sou...@gmail.com>: > Thi

[openstack-dev] [Nova] [RFC] ResourceProviderTags - Manage Capabilities with ResourceProvider

This propose is about using ResourceProviderTags as a solution to manage Capabilities (Qualitative) in ResourceProvider. The ResourceProviderTags is to describe the capabilities which are defined by OpenStack Service (Compute Service, Storage Service, Network Service etc.) and by users. The

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Questions about instance actions' update and finish

2016-07-02 2:32 GMT+08:00 Sean Dague : > On 06/30/2016 08:31 AM, Andrew Laski wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, Jun 29, 2016, at 11:11 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: > >> On 6/29/2016 10:10 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: > >>> On 6/29/2016 6:40 AM, Andrew Laski wrote: > > > >

[openstack-dev] [nova] Nova API sub-team meeting

Hi, We have weekly Nova API meeting today. The meeting is being held Wednesday UTC1300 and irc channel is #openstack-meeting-4. The proposed agenda and meeting details are here: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/NovaAPI Please feel free to add items to the agenda. Thanks

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Do we require the 'next' link for paging, always?

they should depend on the DB implementation. Should we keep the old version API unspecified sort order? 2016-06-28 3:07 GMT+08:00 Matt Riedemann <mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>: > There are at least two changes up that add paging support to the API, one > for hypervisors and one for keypa

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Placement API WSGI code -- let's just use flask

2016-06-22 22:52 GMT+08:00 Chris Dent : > On Tue, 21 Jun 2016, Sean Dague wrote: > > I honestly don't think raw WSGI is a bad choice here. People are going >> to be pretty familiar with it in related projects at this level. >> > > Yeah, WSGI itself is a framework, one that

[openstack-dev] [nova] Nova API sub-team meeting

Hi, We have weekly Nova API meeting today. The meeting is being held Wednesday UTC1300 and irc channel is #openstack-meeting-4. The proposed agenda and meeting details are here: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/NovaAPI Please feel free to add items to the agenda. Thanks

[openstack-dev] [nova] Nova API sub-team meeting

Hi, We have weekly Nova API meeting tomorrow. The meeting is being held Wednesday UTC1300 and irc channel is #openstack-meeting-4. The proposed agenda and meeting details are here: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/NovaAPI Please feel free to add items to the agenda. Thanks

[openstack-dev] [nova] Nova API sub-team meeting

Hi, We have weekly Nova API meeting today. The meeting is being held Wednesday UTC1300 and irc channel is #openstack-meeting-4. The proposed agenda and meeting details are here: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/NovaAPI Please feel free to add items to the agenda. Thanks

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] API changes on limit / marker / sort in Newton

2016-05-20 20:05 GMT+08:00 Sean Dague : > There are a number of changes up for spec reviews that add parameters to > LIST interfaces in Newton: > > * keypairs-pagination (MERGED) - > >

[openstack-dev] [nova] Nova API sub-team meeting

Hi, We have weekly Nova API meeting today. The meeting is being held Wednesday UTC1300 and irc channel is #openstack-meeting-4. The proposed agenda and meeting details are here: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/NovaAPI Please feel free to add items to the agenda. Thanks

[openstack-dev] [nova] Nova API sub-team meeting

Hi, We have weekly Nova API meeting today. The meeting is being held Wednesday UTC1300 and irc channel is #openstack-meeting-4. The proposed agenda and meeting details are here: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/NovaAPI Please feel free to add items to the agenda. Thanks

[openstack-dev] [nova] Nova API sub-team meeting

Hi, We have weekly Nova API meeting today. The meeting is being held Wednesday UTC1300 and irc channel is #openstack-meeting-4. The proposed agenda and meeting details are here: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/NovaAPI Please feel free to add items to the agenda. Thanks

[openstack-dev] [nova] Nova API sub-team meeting

Hi, We have weekly Nova API meeting today. The meeting is being held Wednesday UTC1300 and irc channel is #openstack-meeting-4. The proposed agenda and meeting details are here: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/NovaAPI Please feel free to add items to the agenda. Thanks

[openstack-dev] [nova] Nova API sub-team meeting

Hi, We have weekly Nova API meeting today. The meeting is being held Wednesday UTC1300 and irc channel is #openstack-meeting-4. The proposed agenda and meeting details are here: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/NovaAPI Please feel free to add items to the agenda. Thanks

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Proposing Andrey Kurilin for python-novaclient core

+1, thanks Andrey for helping on Microversions implementation a lot in python-novaclient! 2016-04-14 1:53 GMT+08:00 Matt Riedemann : > I'd like to propose that we make Andrey Kurilin core on python-novaclient. > > He's been doing a lot of the maintenance the last

[openstack-dev] [nova] Nova API sub-team meeting

Hi, We have weekly Nova API meeting tomorrow. The meeting is being held Wednesday UTC1300 and irc channel is #openstack-meeting-4. The proposed agenda and meeting details are here: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/NovaAPI Please feel free to add items to the agenda. Thanks

[openstack-dev] [nova] Nova API sub-team meeting

Hi, We have weekly Nova API meeting tomorrow. The meeting is being held Wednesday UTC1300 and irc channel is #openstack-meeting-4. The proposed agenda and meeting details are here: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/NovaAPI Please feel free to add items to the agenda. Thanks

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] API priorities in Newton

2016-03-31 19:21 GMT+08:00 Sean Dague <s...@dague.net>: > On 03/31/2016 04:55 AM, Alex Xu wrote: > > > > > > 2016-03-31 5:36 GMT+08:00 Matt Riedemann <mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com > > > As discussed in IRC today, first steps (I think) are removing th

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] API priorities in Newton

2016-03-31 5:36 GMT+08:00 Matt Riedemann : > > > On 3/30/2016 2:26 PM, Sean Dague wrote: > >> During the Nova API meeting we had some conversations about priorities, >> but this feels like the thing where a mailing list conversation is more >> inclusive to get

[openstack-dev] [nova] Nova API sub-team meeting

Hi, We have weekly Nova API meeting tomorrow. The meeting is being held Wednesday UTC1300 and irc channel is #openstack-meeting-4. The proposed agenda and meeting details are here: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/NovaAPI Please feel free to add items to the agenda. Thanks

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] bug 1550250: delete_on_termination" flag: how to proceed?

2016-03-29 16:28 GMT+08:00 Nikola Đipanov : > On 03/29/2016 09:14 AM, Markus Zoeller wrote: > > The discussion around Bug 1550250 [1] doesn't show a clear path on how > > to proceed. In short, it's about if we want to keep the flag > > "delete_on_termination" for volumes

[openstack-dev] [nova] Nova API sub-team meeting

Hi, We have weekly Nova API meeting tomorrow. The meeting is being held Wednesday UTC1300 and irc channel is #openstack-meeting-4. The proposed agenda and meeting details are here: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/NovaAPI Please feel free to add items to the agenda. Thanks

[openstack-dev] [nova] Nova API sub-team meeting

Hi, We have weekly Nova API meeting today with new meeting time and new irc channel. The meeting is being held Wednesday UTC1300 and irc channel #openstack-meeting-4. The proposed agenda and meeting details are here: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/NovaAPI Please feel free to add

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] The vote for new Nova API sub-team meeting time

2016-03-12 6:14 GMT+08:00 Tony Breeds <t...@bakeyournoodle.com>: > On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 07:16:41PM +0800, Alex Xu wrote: > > Hi, folks, > > > > From the result of vote, all the peoples are available on Wednesday at > > 1300UTC. If no more questions, I thin

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Nova PTL for Newton

Thanks for all your leadership, John! Really really appreciated all the help from you! 2016-03-12 3:22 GMT+08:00 John Garbutt : > Hi, > > It has been greatly rewarding serving you all as Nova PTL over the > Liberty and Mitaka cycles. I thank you all for the support, >

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] The vote for new Nova API sub-team meeting time

Hi, folks, >From the result of vote, all the peoples are available on Wednesday at 1300UTC. If no more questions, I think we can start with new time from next week. And we will switch to #openstack-meeting-4 channel. Thanks Alex 2016-03-09 15:56 GMT+08:00 Alex Xu <sou...@gmail.com&g

[openstack-dev] [nova] The vote for new Nova API sub-team meeting time

Hi, Looks like it's time to think about adjust nova api meeting now. I found really hard find a time which good for everyone. But let me give a try. I find out those time slots: 1400UTC: this is the time which closes to most people can join the meeting. But it's still very late or early for some

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] How to fix the wrong usage of 'format' jsonschema keyword in server create API

2016-03-07 21:10 GMT+08:00 Jay Pipes <jaypi...@gmail.com>: > On 03/07/2016 08:05 AM, Alex Xu wrote: > >> 2016-03-07 19:23 GMT+08:00 Sean Dague <s...@dague.net >> <mailto:s...@dague.net>>: >> >> On 03/07/2016 01:18 AM, Alex Xu wrote: >&

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] How to fix the wrong usage of 'format' jsonschema keyword in server create API

2016-03-07 19:23 GMT+08:00 Sean Dague <s...@dague.net>: > On 03/07/2016 01:18 AM, Alex Xu wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Due to this regression bug https://launchpad.net/bugs/1552888, found we > > are using 'formart' jsonschema keyword in wrong way. The 'format' is

[openstack-dev] [nova] How to fix the wrong usage of 'format' jsonschema keyword in server create API

Hi, Due to this regression bug https://launchpad.net/bugs/1552888, found we are using 'formart' jsonschema keyword in wrong way. The 'format' is not only for string instance, but all the types. So checking the server create API, we have problem at

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Non-Admin user can show deleted instances using changes-since parameter when calling list API

2016-03-03 2:11 GMT+08:00 Matt Riedemann : > > > On 3/2/2016 3:02 AM, Zhenyu Zheng wrote: > >> Hi, Nova, >> >> While I'm working on add "changes-since" parameter support for >> python-novaclient "list" CLI. >> >> I realized that non-admin can list all deleted instances

[openstack-dev] [nova] Nova API sub-team meeting

We have weekly Nova API meeting today. The meeting is being held Tuesday UTC1200. The proposed agenda and meeting details are here: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/NovaAPI Please feel free to add items to the agenda. Thanks

[openstack-dev] [nova] Nova API sub-team meeting

We have weekly Nova API meeting tomorrow. The meeting is being held Tuesday UTC1200. The proposed agenda and meeting details are here: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/NovaAPI Please feel free to add items to the agenda. Thanks

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Should we signal backwards incompatible changes in microversions?

2016-02-16 19:53 GMT+08:00 Sean Dague : > On 02/12/2016 03:55 PM, Andrew Laski wrote: > > Starting a new thread to continue a thought that came up in > > > http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2016-February/086457.html > . > > The Nova API microversion framework

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][API] Does nova API allow the server_id parem as DB index?

I think I miss one problem. I didn't found anywhere user can get the DB index from nova API. So even the 'show' action have the ability to show with DB index, but actually nobody can use that, due to there isn't a way to query the DB index for a server, except the user query the DB directly. For

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Should we signal backwards incompatible changes in microversions?

2016-02-16 9:47 GMT+08:00 GHANSHYAM MANN <ghanshyamm...@gmail.com>: > Regards > Ghanshyam Mann > > > On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 12:07 PM, Alex Xu <sou...@gmail.com> wrote: > > If we support 2.x.y, when we bump 'x' is a problem. We didn't order the > API > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][API] Does nova API allow the server_id parem as DB index?

I don't think our API supports get servers by DB index is good idea. So I prefer we remove it in the future with microversions. But for now, yes, it is here. 2016-02-16 8:03 GMT+08:00 少合冯 : > I guess others may ask the same questions. > > I read the nova API doc: > such as

[openstack-dev] [nova] Nova API sub-team meeting

We have weekly Nova API meeting tomorrow. The meeting is being held Tuesday UTC1200. The proposed agenda and meeting details are here: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/NovaAPI Please feel free to add items to the agenda. Thanks

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Update on live migration priority

2016-02-13 0:21 GMT+08:00 Murray, Paul (HP Cloud) : > This time with a tag in case anyone is filtering… > > > > *From:* Murray, Paul (HP Cloud) > *Sent:* 12 February 2016 16:16 > *To:* openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org > *Subject:* [openstack-dev] Update on live migration

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][neutron] How would nova microversion get-me-a-network in the API?

2016-02-13 19:05 GMT+08:00 Andrew Laski : > > > On Fri, Feb 12, 2016, at 03:51 PM, Ed Leafe wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > Hash: SHA512 > > > > On 02/12/2016 02:41 PM, Andrew Laski wrote: > > > > >> I think if the point of the experience for this API is to be

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][neutron] How would nova microversion get-me-a-network in the API?

May I ask can we put those thing in to the CLI? I guess there should have similar discussion and I missed. As we didn't want to provide more neutron API proxy, this works sounds like adding more proxy. And API is more simple and more flexible, this make the API have more complex behaviour. Just

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Should we signal backwards incompatible changes in microversions?

If we support 2.x.y, when we bump 'x' is a problem. We didn't order the API changes for now, the version of API change is just based on the order of patch merge. For support 2.x.y, we need bump 'y' first for back-compatible changes I guess. As I remember, we said before, the new feature is the

[openstack-dev] [nova] Nova API sub-team meeting

We have weekly Nova API meeting tomorrow. The meeting is being held Tuesday UTC1200. The proposed agenda and meeting details are here: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/NovaAPI Please feel free to add items to the agenda. Thanks

[openstack-dev] [nova] Cancel Nova API sub-team meeting today

Hi, As most of peoples are in the mid-cycle meetup. So we will cancel the nova api meeting today. Thanks __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe:

[openstack-dev] [nova] Nova API sub-team meeting

We have weekly Nova API meeting tomorrow. The meeting is being held Tuesday UTC1200. The proposed agenda and meeting details are here: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/NovaAPI Please feel free to add items to the agenda. Thanks

[openstack-dev] [nova] Nova API sub-team meeting

Sorry for sending this mail late. We have weekly Nova API meeting today. The meeting is being held Tuesday UTC1200. The proposed agenda and meeting details are here: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/NovaAPI Please feel free to add items to the agenda. Thanks

[openstack-dev] [nova] Nova API sub-team meeting

Hi, Welcome back everyone and happy new year! We have weekly Nova API meeting this week. The meeting is being held Tuesday UTC1200. The proposed agenda and meeting details are here: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/NovaAPI Please feel free to add items to the agenda. Thanks

[openstack-dev] [nova] No Nova API sub-team meeting in next weeks

Hi, Most of api sub-team members aren't there. So we will cancel nova api meetings in next two weeks: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/NovaAPI Hope everyone happy and enjoy the holidays! Thanks Alex __ OpenStack

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Microversions support for extensions without Controller

Hi, Alexandre, we discussed this on api meeting http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/nova_api/2015/nova_api.2015-12-15-12.00.log.html Finally people agreement on merge os-user-data into servers. I will submit a patch up for this merge. Thanks Alex 2015-12-14 21:24 GMT+08:00 Alex Xu <

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Microversions support for extensions without Controller

Hi, Alexandre, Yes, I think we need pass the version into `server_update` extension point. My irc nick is alex_xu, let me know if you have any trouble with this. Thanks Alex 2015-12-13 2:34 GMT+08:00 Alexandre Levine : > Hi all, > > os-user-data extension implements

[openstack-dev] [nova] Nova API sub-team meeting

Hi, We have weekly Nova API meeting this week. The meeting is being held Tuesday UTC1200. The proposed agenda and meeting details are here: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/NovaAPI Please feel free to add items to the agenda. Thanks

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][docs][api] Propose Virtual Nova API Doc Sprint on Dec 8 and 9

Anita, thanks for the reminder, so cool we have such wiki, just add my one. 2015-12-07 21:49 GMT+08:00 Anita Kuno <ante...@anteaya.info>: > On 12/04/2015 09:48 AM, Alex Xu wrote: > > Just reminder the event which close the time, the virtual doc sprint is > > right next wee

[openstack-dev] [nova] Nova API sub-team meeting

Hi, We have weekly Nova API meeting this week. The meeting is being held Tuesday UTC1200. The proposed agenda and meeting details are here: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/NovaAPI Please feel free to add items to the agenda. Thanks

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] no user/project validation in "nova quota-show"?

2015-12-08 8:38 GMT+08:00 Kevin L. Mitchell : > On Mon, 2015-12-07 at 18:21 -0600, Chris Friesen wrote: > > Can someone explain why nova doesn't seem to be doing any validation in > the > > "nova quota-show" command? (At least in kilo/stable.) > > > > If I run: > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] [python-novaclient] microversions support

2015-12-05 1:23 GMT+08:00 Kevin L. Mitchell : > On Fri, 2015-12-04 at 18:58 +0200, Andrey Kurilin wrote: > > This week I added 5 patches to enable 2.7-2.11 microversions in > > novaclient[1][2][3][4][5]. I'm not bragging. Just want to ask everyone > > who are working

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] jsonschema for scheduler hints

2015-12-04 16:48 GMT+08:00 Sylvain Bauza <sba...@redhat.com>: > > > Le 04/12/2015 04:21, Alex Xu a écrit : > > > > 2015-12-02 23:12 GMT+08:00 Sylvain Bauza <sba...@redhat.com>: > >> >> >> Le 02/12/2015 15:23, Sean Dague a écrit : >>

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][docs][api] Propose Virtual Nova API Doc Sprint on Dec 8 and 9

Just reminder the event which close the time, the virtual doc sprint is right next week. Welcome to join us! 2015-11-11 20:51 GMT+08:00 Alex Xu <sou...@gmail.com>: > Hi, > > At nova api subteam weekly meeting, we decided hold 2 days virtual doc > sprint to help the Nova API doc

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] jsonschema for scheduler hints

2015-12-02 23:12 GMT+08:00 Sylvain Bauza : > > > Le 02/12/2015 15:23, Sean Dague a écrit : > >> We have previously agreed that scheduler hints in Nova are an open ended >> thing. It's expected for sites to have additional scheduler filters >> which expose new hints. The way we

[openstack-dev] [nova] Nova API sub-team meeting

Hi, We have weekly Nova API meeting this week. The meeting is being held Tuesday UTC1200. The proposed agenda and meeting details are here: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/NovaAPI Please feel free to add items to the agenda. Thanks

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] How were we going to remove soft delete again?

2015-11-30 19:42 GMT+08:00 Sean Dague : > On 11/24/2015 11:36 AM, Matt Riedemann wrote: > > I know in Vancouver we talked about no more soft delete and in Mitaka > > lxsli decoupled the nova models from the SoftDeleteMixin [1]. > > > > From what I remember, the idea is to not add

[openstack-dev] [nova] Nova API sub-team meeting

Hi, We have weekly Nova API meeting this week. The meeting is being held Tuesday UTC1200. The proposed agenda and meeting details are here: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/NovaAPI Please feel free to add items to the agenda. Thanks

[openstack-dev] [nova] Nova API sub-team meeting

Hi, We have weekly Nova API meeting this week. The meeting is being held Tuesday UTC1200. The proposed agenda and meeting details are here: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/NovaAPI Please feel free to add items to the agenda. Thanks Alex

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Proposal to add Alex Xu to nova-core

2015-11-13 17:36 GMT+08:00 John Garbutt <j...@johngarbutt.com>: > On 6 November 2015 at 15:32, John Garbutt <j...@johngarbutt.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I propose we add Alex Xu[1] to nova-core. > > > > Over the last few cycles he has consisten

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][docs][api] Propose Virtual Nova API Doc Sprint on Dec 8 and 9

Sorry, add [docs] and [api] tags to the title! 2015-11-11 20:51 GMT+08:00 Alex Xu <sou...@gmail.com>: > Hi, > > At nova api subteam weekly meeting, we decided hold 2 days virtual doc > sprint to help the Nova API document. The initial proposed date is Dec 8 > and 9(Le

[openstack-dev] [nova] Propose Virtual Nova API Doc Sprint on Dec 8 and 9

Hi, At nova api subteam weekly meeting, we decided hold 2 days virtual doc sprint to help the Nova API document. The initial proposed date is Dec 8 and 9(Let me know if the date is conflict with other thing). The sprint is running on local time for folks. Peoples can work on the patch and also

[openstack-dev] [nova] Welcome to contribute on improvement the nova API documentation

Hi, At Tokyo summit, we decided the API documentation is hight priority and focus on Mitaka release. We really need better API documentation to help user to use our API easily. Those API doc works are also good for new contributors, it is good chance to get familiar with nova. So if you are

[openstack-dev] [nova] Nova API sub-team meeting

Hi, We have weekly Nova API meeting this week. The meeting is being held Tuesday UTC1200. In other timezones the meeting is at: EST 08:00 (Tue) Japan 21:00 (Tue) China 20:00 (Tue) United Kingdom 13:00 (Tue) The proposed agenda and meeting details are here:

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Nova API sub-team meeting

2015-11-09 21:49 GMT+08:00 Ed Leafe <e...@leafe.com>: > On Nov 9, 2015, at 7:11 AM, Alex Xu <sou...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > We have weekly Nova API meeting this week. The meeting is being held > Tuesday UTC1200. > > > > In other timezones the meeti

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] [doc] How to support Microversions and Actions in Swagger Spec

2015-11-06 22:22 GMT+08:00 Anne Gentle <annegen...@justwriteclick.com>: > > > On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 9:31 PM, Alex Xu <sou...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi, folks >> >> Nova API sub-team is working on the swagger generation. And there is PoC >> https:/

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] [doc] How to support Microversions and Actions in Swagger Spec

2015-11-06 20:46 GMT+08:00 John Garbutt <j...@johngarbutt.com>: > On 6 November 2015 at 03:31, Alex Xu <sou...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi, folks > > > > Nova API sub-team is working on the swagger generation. And there is PoC > > https://review.openstack.org

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][policy] Exposing hypervisor details to users

2015-11-06 20:59 GMT+08:00 Sean Dague : > On 11/06/2015 07:28 AM, John Garbutt wrote: > > On 6 November 2015 at 12:09, Sean Dague wrote: > >> On 11/06/2015 04:49 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > >>> On Fri, Nov 06, 2015 at 05:08:59PM +1100, Tony Breeds wrote: >

[openstack-dev] [nova] Nova API sub-team meeting

Hi, We have weekly Nova API meeting this week. The meeting is being held Tuesday UTC1200. In other timezones the meeting is at: EST 08:00 (Tue) Japan 21:00 (Tue) China 20:00 (Tue) United Kingdom 13:00 (Tue) The proposed agenda and meeting details are here:

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] python-novaclient 2.32.0 not working with rackspace

Looks like we use API_MAX_VERSION and DEFAULT_OS_COMPUTE_API_VERSION with wrong way. This isn't broken with rackspace only, this broken novaclient runing with nova legacy v2 api(legacy v2 api's behavior is no version exposed). API_MAX_VERSION is the max version of client supported, currently it

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] python-novaclient 2.32.0 not working with rackspace

I just work out a patch quickly for fixing this, https://review.openstack.org/237850 2015-10-21 10:08 GMT+08:00 Alex Xu <sou...@gmail.com>: > Looks like we use API_MAX_VERSION and DEFAULT_OS_COMPUTE_API_VERSION with > wrong way. This isn't broken with rackspace only, this broke

[openstack-dev] [nova] Nova API sub-team meeting

Hi, We have weekly Nova API meeting this week. The meeting is being held Tuesday UTC1200. In other timezones the meeting is at: EST 08:00 (Tue) Japan 21:00 (Tue) China 20:00 (Tue) United Kingdom 13:00 (Tue) The proposed agenda and meeting details are here:

[openstack-dev] [nova] Nova API sub-team meeting

Hi, We have weekly Nova API meeting this week. The meeting is being held Tuesday UTC1200. In other timezones the meeting is at: EST 08:00 (Tue) Japan 21:00 (Tue) China 20:00 (Tue) United Kingdom 13:00 (Tue) The proposed agenda and meeting details are here:

<    1   2   3   4   >