[openstack-dev] [heat] Network name as a Server properties

2015-03-30 Thread BORTMAN, Limor (Limor)
Hi,
I noticed the we can't use network name under OS::Neutron::Port (only 
network_id) as a valid neutron property, and I was wondering why?

I expected it to be like image under OS::Nova::Server: 
 The property name should be network, and it should accept both id and name

Thanks 
Stotland Limor


__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


Re: [openstack-dev] [Global Requirements] Adding apscheduler to global requirements

2015-06-03 Thread BORTMAN, Limor (Limor)
From: Renat Akhmerov rakhme...@mirantis.com
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Global Requirements] Adding apscheduler to global 
requirements
Date: 3 Jun 2015 16:48:08 GMT+6
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) 
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org

Thanks Doug, got it.

Limor, can you please explain why exactly do you need this library?
This is the only live library I found that enable creating scheduled job in 
seconds granularity.
I am planning on using : BackgroundScheduler 
(apscheduler.schedulers.background).
Doug, Does Oslo have this ability?

Renat Akhmerov
@ Mirantis Inc.



On 02 Jun 2015, at 18:45, Doug Hellmann d...@doughellmann.com wrote:

Excerpts from Renat Akhmerov's message of 2015-06-02 18:26:40 +0600:

Any comments from TC on that? What is the typical procedure of accepting new 
libs into global requirements?

There is a requirements management team, and usually we would want
a patch to the list in openstack/requirements, with some description
of the need for the package, especially which projects are going
to use it and why no existing package with similar functionality
is suitable. There are more details about the evaluation criteria
in http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/requirements/tree/README.rst

Doug



Thanks

Renat Akhmerov
@ Mirantis Inc.


On 02 Jun 2015, at 18:11, BORTMAN, Limor (Limor) 
limor.bort...@alcatel-lucent.com wrote:

Hi all,
As part as a BP in mistral (Add seconds granularity in cron-trigger execute[1])
I would like to add apscheduler (Advanced Python Scheduler[2]) to the openstack 
Global Requirements.

Any objections?

[1] 
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/mistral/+spec/cron-trigger-seconds-granularity
[2] https://apscheduler.readthedocs.org/en/latest/


Thanks Stotland Limor 

__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev



__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


Re: [openstack-dev] [mistral] Proposing Lingxian Kong as a core reviewer

2015-06-22 Thread BORTMAN, Limor (Limor)
+1

From: W Chan [mailto:m4d.co...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2015 12:07 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: [openstack-dev] [mistral] Proposing Lingxian Kong as a core reviewer

+1

Lingxian, keep up with the good work. :D
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


Re: [openstack-dev] [Mistral] Proposal for the Resume Feature

2015-06-15 Thread BORTMAN, Limor (Limor)
+1,
I just have one question. Do we want to able resume for WF  in error state?
I mean isn't real resume it should be more of a rerun, don't you think?
So in an error state we will create new executor and just re run it
Thanks Limor



-Original Message-
From: Lingxian Kong [mailto:anlin.k...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2015 5:47 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Mistral] Proposal for the Resume Feature

Thanks Winson for the write-up, very detailed infomation. (the format was good)

I'm totally in favor of your idea, actually, I really think you proposal is 
complementary to my proposal in 
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/vancouver-2015-design-summit-mistral,
please see 'Workflow rollback/recovery' section.

What I wanna do is configure some 'checkpoints' throughout the workflow, and if 
some task failed, we could rollback the execution to some checkpoint, and 
resume the whole workflow after we have fixed some problem, seems like the 
execution has never been failed before.

It's just a initial idea, I'm waiting for our discussion to see if it really 
makes sense to users, to get feedback, then we can talk about the 
implementation and cooperation.

On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 7:51 AM, W Chan m4d.co...@gmail.com wrote:
 Resending to see if this fixes the formatting for outlines below.


 I want to continue the discussion on the workflow resume feature.


 Resuming from our last conversation @
 http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2015-March/060265.h
 tml. I don't think we should limit how users resume. There may be 
 different possible scenarios. User can fix the environment or 
 condition that led to the failure of the current task and the user 
 wants to just re-run the failed task.  Or user can actually fix the 
 environment/condition which include fixing what the task was doing, 
 then just want to continue the next set of task(s).


 The following is a list of proposed changes.


 1. A new CLI operation to resume WF (i.e. mistral workflow-resume).

 A. If no additional info is provided, assume this WF is manually 
 paused and there are no task/action execution errors. The WF state is 
 updated to RUNNING. Update using the put method @ 
 ExecutionsController. The put method checks that there's no task/action 
 execution errors.

 B. If WF is in an error state

 i. To resume from failed task, the workflow-resume command 
 requires the WF execution ID, task name, and/or task input.

 ii. To resume from failed with-items task

 a. Re-run the entire task (re-run all items) requires WF
 execution ID, task name and/or task input.

 b. Re-run a single item requires WF execution ID, task 
 name, with-items index, and/or task input for the item.

 c. Re-run selected items requires WF execution ID, task 
 name, with-items indices, and/or task input for each items.

 - To resume from the next task(s), the workflow-resume 
 command requires the WF execution ID, failed task name, output for the 
 failed task, and a flag to skip the failed task.


 2. Make ERROR - RUNNING as valid state transition @ 
 is_valid_transition function.


 3. Add a comments field to Execution model. Add a note that indicates 
 the execution is launched by workflow-resume. Auto-populated in this case.


 4. Resume from failed task.

 A. Re-run task with the same task inputs  POST new action 
 execution for the task execution @ ActionExecutionsController

 B. Re-run task with different task inputs  POST new action 
 execution for the task execution, allowed for different input @ 
 ActionExecutionsController


 5. Resume from next task(s).

 A. Inject a noop task execution or noop action execution 
 (undecided yet) for the failed task with appropriate output.  The spec 
 is an adhoc spec that copies conditions from the failed task. This 
 provides some audit functionality and should trigger the next set of 
 task executions (in case of branching and such).



 __
  OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
 Unsubscribe: 
 openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
 http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev




--
Regards!
---
Lingxian Kong

__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


Re: [openstack-dev] [Global Requirements] Adding apscheduler to global requirements

2015-06-11 Thread BORTMAN, Limor (Limor)
Hi all
can anybody please take a look on my PR[1]?

[1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/189564/

Thanks Limor

-Original Message-
From: BORTMAN, Limor (Limor) [mailto:limor.bort...@alcatel-lucent.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, June 03, 2015 2:28 PM
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Global Requirements] Adding apscheduler to global 
requirements

From: Renat Akhmerov rakhme...@mirantis.com
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Global Requirements] Adding apscheduler to global 
requirements
Date: 3 Jun 2015 16:48:08 GMT+6
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) 
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org

Thanks Doug, got it.

Limor, can you please explain why exactly do you need this library?
This is the only live library I found that enable creating scheduled job in 
seconds granularity.
I am planning on using : BackgroundScheduler 
(apscheduler.schedulers.background).
Doug, Does Oslo have this ability?

Renat Akhmerov
@ Mirantis Inc.



On 02 Jun 2015, at 18:45, Doug Hellmann d...@doughellmann.com wrote:

Excerpts from Renat Akhmerov's message of 2015-06-02 18:26:40 +0600:

Any comments from TC on that? What is the typical procedure of accepting new 
libs into global requirements?

There is a requirements management team, and usually we would want a patch to 
the list in openstack/requirements, with some description of the need for the 
package, especially which projects are going to use it and why no existing 
package with similar functionality is suitable. There are more details about 
the evaluation criteria in 
http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/requirements/tree/README.rst

Doug



Thanks

Renat Akhmerov
@ Mirantis Inc.


On 02 Jun 2015, at 18:11, BORTMAN, Limor (Limor) 
limor.bort...@alcatel-lucent.com wrote:

Hi all,
As part as a BP in mistral (Add seconds granularity in cron-trigger execute[1]) 
I would like to add apscheduler (Advanced Python Scheduler[2]) to the openstack 
Global Requirements.

Any objections?

[1] 
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/mistral/+spec/cron-trigger-seconds-granularity
[2] https://apscheduler.readthedocs.org/en/latest/


Thanks Stotland Limor 

__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev



__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


[openstack-dev] [Global Requirements] Adding apscheduler to global requirements

2015-06-02 Thread BORTMAN, Limor (Limor)
Hi all,
As part as a BP in mistral (Add seconds granularity in cron-trigger execute[1])
I would like to add apscheduler (Advanced Python Scheduler[2]) to the openstack 
Global Requirements.

Any objections?

[1] 
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/mistral/+spec/cron-trigger-seconds-granularity
[2] https://apscheduler.readthedocs.org/en/latest/
 

Thanks Stotland Limor 

__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


[openstack-dev] puppet-mistral

2015-08-06 Thread BORTMAN, Limor (Limor)
Hi all,
I am trying to push mistral puppet but so far no one from the puppet team take 
a look. 
can anyone please take a look ?

Thanks 
Limor Stotland
ALCATEL-LUCENT
SENIOR SOFTWARE ENGINEER
CLOUDBAND BUSINESS UNIT
16 Atir Yeda St. Kfar-Saba 44643, ISRAEL
T:  +972 (0) 9 793 3166
M: +972 (0) 54 585 3736
limor.bort...@alcatel-lucent.com


__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


[openstack-dev] [puppet]puppet-mistral

2015-08-06 Thread BORTMAN, Limor (Limor)
Hi all,
I am trying to push mistral puppet but so far no one from the puppet team take 
a look. 
can anyone please take a look ?

Thanks 
Limor Stotland
ALCATEL-LUCENT
SENIOR SOFTWARE ENGINEER
CLOUDBAND BUSINESS UNIT
16 Atir Yeda St. Kfar-Saba 44643, ISRAEL
T:  +972 (0) 9 793 3166
M: +972 (0) 54 585 3736
limor.bort...@alcatel-lucent.com

__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


[openstack-dev] [puppet]puppet-mistral

2015-08-12 Thread BORTMAN, Limor (Limor)
Hi all,
I have some changes at the end of last week and so far i got no comment on it. 
can anyone please take a look? 
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/208457/10

Thanks 
Thanks 
Limor Stotland
ALCATEL-LUCENT
SENIOR SOFTWARE ENGINEER
CLOUDBAND BUSINESS UNIT
16 Atir Yeda St. Kfar-Saba 44643, ISRAEL
T:  +972 (0) 9 793 3166
M: +972 (0) 54 585 3736
limor.bort...@alcatel-lucent.com

__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


[openstack-dev] [opesntack-puppet] mistral puppet

2015-07-15 Thread BORTMAN, Limor (Limor)
Hi all,
I have puppet for mistral and i would like to contribute it.
Any objection/comments?

Thanks 
Limor Stotland
ALCATEL-LUCENT
SENIOR SOFTWARE ENGINEER
CLOUDBAND BUSINESS UNIT
16 Atir Yeda St. Kfar-Saba 44643, ISRAEL
T:  +972 (0) 9 793 3166
M: +972 (0) 54 585 3736
limor.bort...@alcatel-lucent.com


__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


[openstack-dev] [openstack-puppet] mistral puppet

2015-07-15 Thread BORTMAN, Limor (Limor)
Hi all,
I have puppet for mistral and i would like to contribute it.
Any objection/comments?

Thanks 
Limor Stotland
ALCATEL-LUCENT
SENIOR SOFTWARE ENGINEER
CLOUDBAND BUSINESS UNIT
16 Atir Yeda St. Kfar-Saba 44643, ISRAEL
T:  +972 (0) 9 793 3166
M: +972 (0) 54 585 3736
limor.bort...@alcatel-lucent.com


__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev