Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-sigs] [FEMDC] [Edge] [tripleo] On the use of terms "Edge" and "Far Edge"

;Far Edge" Fyi – could this help? https://www.linuxfoundation.org/blog/2018/06/edge-computing-just-got-its-rosetta-stone/ https://imasons.org/ starting to host workshops about this as well https://imasons.org/events/2018-im-edge-congress/ From: Csatari, Gergely (Nokia - HU/Budapest)

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-sigs] [FEMDC] [Edge] [tripleo] On the use of terms "Edge" and "Far Edge"

Hi, I’m adding the ECG mailing list to the discussion. I think the root of the problem is that there is no single definition of „the edge” (except for [1]), but it changes from group to group or use case to use case. What I recognise as the

[openstack-dev] [edge][glance][ptg]: Image handling wiki updated

Hi, I've updated the Image handling in edge environment wiki [1] based on the notes [2] from the Denver ptg discussions. Please check and comment. Thanks,

[openstack-dev] [edge][keystone][ptg]: Keystone edge architectures wiki updated

Hi, I've updated the Keystone edge architectures wiki [1] based on the notes [2] we generated in the Denver workshop. Please check and comment. Thanks, Gerg0 [1]:

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic][edge] Notes from the PTG

Hi Jim, Thanks for sharing your notes. One note about the jumping automomus control plane requirement. This requirement was already identified during the Dublin PTG workshop [1]. This is needed for two reasons

Re: [openstack-dev] [os-upstream-institute] Team lunch at the PTG next week - ACTION NEEDED

Hi, I’m in. Br, Gerg0 From: Miguel Lavalle Sent: Saturday, September 8, 2018 10:30 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [os-upstream-institute] Team lunch at the PTG next week - ACTION NEEDED Hi Ildikó, Wednesday lunch is fine

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO]Addressing Edge/Multi-site/Multi-cloud deployment use cases (new squad)

List Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO]Addressing Edge/Multi-site/Multi-cloud deployment use cases (new squad) On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 2:40 AM Csatari, Gergely (Nokia - HU/Budapest) wrote: > > Hi, > > There was a two days workshop on edge requirements back in Dublin. The notes

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO]Addressing Edge/Multi-site/Multi-cloud deployment use cases (new squad)

Hi, There was a two days workshop on edge requirements back in Dublin. The notes are stored here: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/OpenStack_Edge_Discussions_Dublin_PTG I think there are some areas there what can be interesting for the squad. Edge Computing Group plans to have a day long

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo][Edge][FEMDC] Edge clouds and controlplane updates

Hi, Some comments inline. From: Alan Bishop Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2018 7:09 PM On Tue, Aug 14, 2018 at 9:20 AM Bogdan Dobrelya mailto:bdobr...@redhat.com>> wrote: On 8/13/18 9:47 PM, Giulio Fidente wrote: > Hello, > > I'd like to get some feedback regarding the remaining > work for the

[openstack-dev] [edge][glance][nova][starlngx]: Edge sessions on the PTG

Hi, We will have a whole day discussion on edge on the Tuesday of the PTG [1] where we plan [2] to have discussions on image handling, Nova, Keystone and StarlingX. If you are interested in any of these please add your name to the name lists. Also if you have some ideas to discuss during the

Re: [openstack-dev] [edge][glance]: Image handling in edge environment

Hi, The meeting will take place on 2018.08.01 18-19h CET. Here I attach the invitation. Br, Gerg0 From: Csatari, Gergely (Nokia - HU/Budapest) Sent: Friday, July 20, 2018 1:32 PM To: 'edge-computing' ; 'OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)' Cc: 'jokke' Subject: RE

Re: [openstack-dev] [edge][glance]: Image handling in edge environment

: Csatari, Gergely (Nokia - HU/Budapest) Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2018 10:02 AM To: 'edge-computing' ; OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: [edge][glance]: Image handling in edge environment Hi, We had a great Forum session about image handling in edge environment

[openstack-dev] [edge][glance]: Image handling in edge environment

Hi, We had a great Forum session about image handling in edge environment in Vancouver [1]. As one outcome of the session I've created a wiki with the mentioned architecture options

Re: [openstack-dev] [Edge-computing] [edge][glance][mixmatch]: Wiki of the possible architectures for image synchronisation

Hi, Going inline. From: Waines, Greg [mailto:greg.wai...@windriver.com] Sent: Friday, June 29, 2018 4:25 AM In-lined comments / questions below, Greg. From: "Csatari, Gergely (Nokia - HU/Budapest)" mailto:gergely.csat...@nokia.com>> Date: Thursday, June 28, 2018 at 3:35 AM

Re: [openstack-dev] [Edge-computing] [edge][glance][mixmatch]: Wiki of the possible architectures for image synchronisation

ling_in_edge_environment#Several_Glances_with_an_independent_syncronisation_service.2C_synch_using_the_backend [4]: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Image_handling_in_edge_environment#One_Glance_and_multiple_Glance_API_servers From: Csatari, Gergely (Nokia - HU/Budapest) Sent: Monday, June 11, 2018

Re: [openstack-dev] [Edge-computing] [edge][glance][mixmatch]: Wiki of the possible architectures for image synchronisation

, 2018 1:46 PM To: Csatari, Gergely (Nokia - HU/Budapest) ; OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) ; edge-comput...@lists.openstack.org Subject: Re: [Edge-computing] [edge][glance][mixmatch]: Wiki of the possible architectures for image synchronisation Responses in-lined below

Re: [openstack-dev] [Edge-computing] [edge][glance][mixmatch]: Wiki of the possible architectures for image synchronisation

Hi, Going inline. -Original Message- From: Erno Kuvaja [mailto:ekuv...@redhat.com] Sent: Friday, June 8, 2018 3:18 PM Hi, Answering inline. Best, Erno "jokke" Kuvaja On Thu, Jun 7, 2018 at 11:49 AM, Csatari, Gergely (Nokia - HU/Budapest) wrote: > Hi, > > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [Edge-computing] [edge][glance][mixmatch]: Wiki of the possible architectures for image synchronisation

for the pull model once you have the push model in place? Here is the updated wiki: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Image_handling_in_edge_environment Thanks, Gerg0 From: "Csatari, Gergely (Nokia - HU/Budapest)" mailto:gergely.csat...@nokia.com>> Date: Thursday, June 7,

Re: [openstack-dev] [edge][glance][mixmatch]: Wiki of the possible architectures for image synchronisation

rom: Csatari, Gergely (Nokia - HU/Budapest) Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2018 8:59 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) ; edge-comput...@lists.openstack.org Subject: [edge][glance]: Wiki of the possible architectures for image synchronisation Hi, Here I send the w

[openstack-dev] [edge][glance]: Wiki of the possible architectures for image synchronisation

Hi, Here I send the wiki page [1] where I summarize what I understood from the Forum session about image synchronisation in edge environment [2], [3]. Please check and correct/comment. Thanks, Gerg0 [1]:

Re: [openstack-dev] [edge][keystone][forum]: Keystone edge brainstorming etherpad

brainstorming etherpad On 05/10/2018 06:30 AM, Csatari, Gergely (Nokia - HU/Budapest) wrote: Hi, I've added some initial text to the Etherpad [1<https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/YVR-edge-keystone-brainstorming>] of the Possible edge architectures for Keystone Forum session [2

[openstack-dev] [edge][keystone][forum]: Keystone edge brainstorming etherpad

Hi, I've added some initial text to the Etherpad [1] of the Possible edge architectures for Keystone Forum session

Re: [openstack-dev] Vancouver Forum - Post your selected topics now

Hi, There are two lists of etherpads for forum brainstorming in https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Forum/Vancouver2018 and there is http://forumtopics.openstack.org/ . Is my understanding correct, that ultimatelly all ideas should go to http://forumtopics.openstack.org/ ? Thanks, Gerg0

[openstack-dev] [etsinfv][gap-03][blazar]: Network resources to be reserved

Hi, During the Forum session about the ETSI NFV Gaps I received a request to clarify what network resources should be reserved. According to the feedback from the IFA group the most important network resources to be reserved are bandwith and public IP addresses. Any comments are welcome, also

Re: [openstack-dev] [First Contact] [SIG] Presence at the PTG

Hi, I’m also interested. Br, Gerg0 From: Kendall Nelson [mailto:kennelso...@gmail.com] Sent: Saturday, December 16, 2017 12:27 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [First Contact] [SIG] Presence at

Re: [openstack-dev] [etsinfv][gap-04][blazar]: Clarification on the scope of the capacity query

[mailto:jaypi...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, December 11, 2017 4:41 PM To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [etsinfv][gap-04][blazar]: Clarification on the scope of the capacity query On 12/11/2017 07:24 AM, Csatari, Gergely (Nokia - HU/Budapest) wrote: > Hi Masah

Re: [openstack-dev] [etsinfv][gap-04][blazar]: Clarification on the scope of the capacity query

On 2017/12/06 22:10, Csatari, Gergely (Nokia - HU/Budapest) wrote: > Hi, > > During the Forum session about the ETSI NFV Gaps I received a request > to clarify the scope of the capacity query mentioned in [GAP-04] with ETSI > NFV. > > The advice is that it should be possibl

Re: [openstack-dev] [etsinfv][neutron][gap-09]: No state for subnets

please elaborate more about the subnet state? FYI - https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Neutron/APIv2-specification#Subnet Thanks Gary From: "Csatari, Gergely (Nokia - HU/Budapest)" <gergely.csat...@nokia.com<mailto:gergely.csat...@nokia.com>> Reply-To: OpenStack List <op

[openstack-dev] [etsinfv][neutron][gap-09]: No state for subnets

Hi, During the discussions in NFV#20 about the subnet state we argeed, that we should remove the state from the specification of subnets in IFA005 and IFA006. This invalidates [GAP-09] in [1]. Br, Gerg0 [1]: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/ptg-denver-etsi-nfv-tst003-gaps-explained

[openstack-dev] [etsinfv][gap-04][blazar]: Clarification on the scope of the capacity query

Hi, During the Forum session about the ETSI NFV Gaps I received a request to clarify the scope of the capacity query mentioned in [GAP-04] with ETSI NFV. The advice is that it should be possible to get the capacity of an OpenStack tenant, an user and a resource provider. This is because the

Re: [openstack-dev] Garbage patches for simple typo fixes

Hi, Isn't it possible to ignore these patches in stackalytics? If the motivation is to look better there, this would solve the problem. Br, Gerg0 -Original Message- From: Jeremy Stanley [mailto:fu...@yuggoth.org] Sent: Friday, September 22, 2017 4:20 PM To: OpenStack Development

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][nova][neutron][qa][panko][blazar]: OpenStack meets ETSI NFV workshop on 12.09.2017

/OpenStack_Joint_meeting_TST_v2.pdf Br, Gerg0 From: Csatari, Gergely (Nokia - HU/Budapest) Sent: Tuesday, September 5, 2017 9:05 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> Cc: Pierre Lynch_Internet <ply...@ixiacom.com>; Ildiko

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][nova][neutron][qa][panko][blazar]: OpenStack meets ETSI NFV workshop on 12.09.2017

rt, and get a list of requirements from ETSI NFV delegates, they want to see in the catalog of VNF packages. Best regards, Mikhail Fedosin On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 6:04 PM, Csatari, Gergely (Nokia - HU/Budapest) <gergely.csat...@nokia.com<mailto:gergely.csat...@nokia.com>> wrote: Hi,

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][nova][neutron][qa][panko][blazar]: OpenStack meets ETSI NFV workshop on 12.09.2017

t talk about IFA007 during the workshop? Best regards, Mikhail Fedosin On Fri, Sep 1, 2017 at 5:30 PM, Csatari, Gergely (Nokia - HU/Budapest) <gergely.csat...@nokia.com<mailto:gergely.csat...@nokia.com>> wrote: Hi, Thanks for the proposal. The aim of this workshop is to accelerate

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][nova][neutron][qa][panko][blazar]: OpenStack meets ETSI NFV workshop on 12.09.2017

-denver-etsi-nfv-tst003-gaps-explained Br, Gerg0 -Original Message- From: Csatari, Gergely (Nokia - HU/Budapest) Sent: Monday, August 28, 2017 4:07 PM To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Subject: RE: [openstack-dev] [all][nova][neutron][qa][panko][blazar]: OpenStack meets ETSI NFV

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][nova][neutron][qa][panko][blazar]: OpenStack meets ETSI NFV workshop on 12.09.2017

t 5:06 PM, Csatari, Gergely (Nokia - HU/Budapest) <gergely.csat...@nokia.com<mailto:gergely.csat...@nokia.com>> wrote: Hi, Thanks for the clarification. Our understanding was that with Panko it is possible to subscribe to the state of the different resource of the cloud as it

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][nova][neutron][qa][panko][blazar]: OpenStack meets ETSI NFV workshop on 12.09.2017

Hi, Thanks for the clarification. Our understanding was that with Panko it is possible to subscribe to the state of the different resource of the cloud as it is descibed in [1]. This is why we mapped the Virtualised [Compute|Network|Storage] Resources Capacity Management Interfaces to

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][nova][neutron][qa][panko][blazar]: OpenStack meets ETSI NFV workshop on 12.09.2017

Hi, Going inline. -Original Message- From: Ghanshyam Mann [mailto:ghanshyamm...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, August 28, 2017 1:03 PM On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 10:58 PM, Csatari, Gergely (Nokia - HU/Budapest) <gergely.csat...@nokia.com> wrote: > Hi, > > > > During the

Re: [openstack-dev] [os-upstream-institute][all] Get together at the PTG

Szia, Jovok. Nekem szerdatol jo. Udv, Gerg0 -Original Message- From: Ildiko Vancsa [mailto:ildiko.van...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, August 25, 2017 4:37 PM To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org; openstack-d...@lists.openstack.org; user-committee

[openstack-dev] [all][nova][neutron][qa][panko][blazar]: OpenStack meets ETSI NFV workshop on 12.09.2017

Hi, During the week of the PTG ETSI NFV will have its plenary meeting in Denver. To benefit from this coincidence there will be a small workshop between ETSI NFV delegates and OpenStack contributors in the PTG hotel. The workshop intends to provide a forum to identify and discuss the common

[openstack-dev] [all] Secrets of edit-constraints

Hi, I have an interesting situation with the parametrization of edit-constraints in tools/tox_install.sh. This happens at the moment in neutron-lib, but as amotoki pointed out in [1] the same should happen in any projects (and actually was happening with me in Vitrage and Mistral). Here is

Re: [openstack-dev] [mistral][core] Proposing Andras Kovi to the Mistral core team

Hi, +1 (from an other Nokia guy, who knows Andras personally and agrees, that he is a good guy ☺) Br, Gerg0 From: Dougal Matthews [mailto:dou...@redhat.com] Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2017 9:54 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Upstream Training Team meeting at PTG - Are you coming?

Hi, We are waiting in Savannah 1 as there is a meeting still ongoing in Savannah 3. Br, Gerg0 Sent from Nine From: Ildiko Vancsa Sent: Feb 21, 2017 9:05 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage

Re: [openstack-dev] Time to retire nova-docker?

Hi, Zun provides a lifecycle management interface for the containers started in the COE deployed with Magnum. In other words a COE is still needed for Zun. For more information look the Zun wiki. Internally, to separate the started containers into different sandboxes Zun uses a fork of

[openstack-dev] [osc]: Support for allowed-address-pairs in osc?

Hi, Is there any way to configure allowed-address-pairs in osc? Thanks, Gerg0 __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Let's clean up APi reference

Hi, https://review.openstack.org/#/c/327112/ targets the parameter verification for servers-actions.inc. Br, Gerg0 -Original Message- From: Sean Dague [mailto:s...@dague.net] Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2016 2:33 PM To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Subject: Re: [openstack-dev]