Re: [openstack-dev] Mixed service version CI testing

make sense? Would this be valuable at all? Or should the opposite > be tested where we upgrade nova to N and leave all of the dependent services > at N-1? > > Really looking for operator community feedback here. I'd def like to see something like this. Thanks, Curtis. >

Re: [openstack-dev] [trove][all][tc] A proposal to rearchitect Trove

at least complete tooling for > deployers to build these); while the project can’t distribute operating > systems and database software, the current deployment model merely impedes > adoption > > - Clusters spanning OpenStack deployments are a real thing that must be > supported >

Re: [openstack-dev] [Keystone] Cockroachdb for Keystone Multi-master

three clouds, but more than that maybe this starts to make sense. Also running Galera has gotten easier but still not that easy. I had thought that the OpenStack community was deprecating Postgres support though, so that could make things a bit harder here (I might be wrong about this). Thanks, Curti

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][networking-l2gw] openstack vtep setup missing docs

On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 8:53 AM, Saverio Proto <saverio.pr...@switch.ch> wrote: > Hello Armando, > > I managed to implement the L2GW setup purely in software, without an > hardware appliance. Nice! That is very interesting. I will take a look at the work you've done here. Than

[openstack-dev] [tricircle] Example EVPN question/use-case

it at very high speeds. Interesting use case, real world. Thanks, Curtis. [1]: http://etherealmind.com/help-wanted-stitching-a-federated-sdn-on-openstack-with-evpn/ __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] Large Contributing OpenStack Operators working group?

I was also recently on a 8 hour conference call with a telecom; they love their conference calls. ;) Thanks, Curtis. > > 2) According to the wiki page, only companies that are "Multi-Cloud > Operator[s] and/or Network Service Provider[s]" are welcome in this team. > Why

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Confusion around the complexity

, ala Digital Ocean (and now somewhat mimicked by AWS with uh, LightSail I think). I've always thought it would perhaps be a nice project in OpenStack to do a simple VPS style interface. Thanks, Curtis. > One of the obvious ones is nova and glance, and the API and usage there > feels prett

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][massively distributed][architecture]Coordination between actions/WGs

On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 2:15 PM, Joshua Harlow <harlo...@fastmail.com> wrote: > Curtis wrote: >> >> On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 1:27 PM, gordon chung<g...@live.ca> wrote: >>> >>> just to clarify, what 'innovation' do you believe is required to enable &

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][massively distributed][architecture]Coordination between actions/WGs

evel, not some other unknown but smaller IoTs...uh thing, does that make more sense from a OpenStack + vCPE context? Or do some think that is out of scope for OpenStack's mission as well? Thanks, Curtis. > > * actually you'll get 100 answers and the rest will say: "i don't know." > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] [gnocchi] profiling and benchmarking 2.1.x

ur slides. Looking forward to what test results you get when you start turning some knobs. Thanks, Curtis. > > cheers, > > -- > gord > ___ > OpenStack-operators mailing list > openstack-operat...@lists.openstack.org > http:

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] OpenVSwitch support

On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 8:13 AM, Truman, Travis <travis_tru...@cable.comcast.com> wrote: > Curtis, > > Please take a look at https://review.openstack.org/#/c/298765/ as its > probably a good place to start digging into OVS. > Perfect, thanks, am looking into it now. :) Than

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] OpenVSwitch support

OK thanks everyone. I will put on my learnening hat and start digging into this. Thanks, Curtis. On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 10:07 AM, Truman, Travis <travis_tru...@cable.comcast.com> wrote: > Michael Gugino and I were going to work on OVS and I believe we both got > sidetracked. I¹ll

[openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] OpenVSwitch support

by the community to add OpenVSwitch support, and potentially other OPNFV related features, I have time to contribute to work on them (as best I can, at any rate). Let me know what you think, Curtis. [1]: https://www.opnfv.org/ [2]: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/osa-neutron-dvr

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] Mid Cycle Sprint

FYI it looks like Ansible Fest London is Feb 18th. On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 1:29 PM, Amy Marrich wrote: > I'd be game to join in if it's in San Antonio. While I'd love to go to > London I don't think I'd make. > > Like Major I'd like to see some doc work. > > Amy

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] [openstack-ansible] Mid Cycle Sprint

On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 5:45 AM, Jesse Pretorius wrote: > Hi everyone, > > At the Mitaka design summit in Tokyo we had some corridor discussions about > doing a mid-cycle meetup for the purpose of continuing some design > discussions and doing some specific sprint work.